User talk:Karsan Chanda

https://www.jatland.com/home/Meena

Use this for more references. Dont reply on this ip.

M add they are war living people in first para. don't reply.

Meenas, Hindoos of low caste. DELETE this pic. as Meena is a very high caste n indigenous tribe. they have st status because they are indigenous people of country. it has nothing to do with high low. राष्ट्र के प्राचीनतम समुदाय - आदिवासी अतार्थ आदिकाल से किसी प्रदेश/देश में निवास करने वाले समुदाय : मूलवासी। देश के कभी मूल मालिक रहे आदिवासियों का अपना एक स्वर्णिम इतिहास रहा है। आर्यो के आगमन से पूर्व आदिवासी राजाओं का अनेक प्रदेशो में शासन रहा, पर वर्तमान में मूल मालिको के वंशजों का आज प्रशासन में काफी कम प्रतिनिधित्व रह गया है। आदिवासी कोई वनवासी नहीं है। वनवासी और आदिवासी में बोहोत फर्क है। वनवासी तो कोई भी हो सकता है जो जंगल में जाकर बस गया चाहे अंग्रेज़ ही हो।

आदिवासी-मूलवासी तो देश में कहीं भी मिल सकते है शहर गांव पहाड़ वन हिमालय रेगिस्थान आदि। जो किसी राज्य विशेष में आदि समय से रह रहे हो। First citizens of that country to settle. Aboriginal People. Tribes are having st status because they are indigenous people of country. It has nothing to do with the forest. आदिवासी उनकी भाषा-संस्कृति, परंपरा और स्वायत्तता को बरकरार रखने तथा जमीन, जंगल, पहाड़, जलस्रोत और खनिज संपदा पर अपना मालिकाना हक हासिल करने के लिए सदियों से संघर्षत है।

माननीय शिवराज सिंह चौहान जी द्वारा जनजाति गौरव दिवस कि शुरुवात की गई है। आदिवासियों के लिए आदिवासी दिवस उसी दिन सार्थक होगा, जिस दिन संविधान में अनुसूचित जनजाति की जगह आदिवासी शब्द का प्रयोग होगा अनुसूचित क्षेत्रों में आदिवासी स्व-शासन व्यवस्था कायम की जायेगी, आदिवासियों को प्राकृतिक संसाधनों पर मालिकाना हक दिया जायेगा और जनसंख्या अनुपात में उनका प्रतिनिधित्व बढ़ाया जाएगा टीएसपी के साथ।

जब सुप्रीम कोर्ट साफ कह चुकी है कि राष्ट्र के असली उतराधिकारी आठ फीसदी आदिवासी ही हैं, तो फिर आरक्षण/प्रतिनिधित्व अधिकारों पर सवाल उठाने वाले षड़यंत्रकारी मनुवादी भ्रष्ट पूंजीवादी तत्वों को खुद की गिरवान में झांकना चाहिये। इतिहासिक रूप से इस बात को एक उदाहरण के जरिये समझ सकते हैं कि-कोई आपके पास आपके मकान में किराये से रहने के लिए आता है और आप उसे मकान किराया पर दे देते है, लेकिन वो आपके मकान पर कब्जा कर लेता है, आप मकान खाली कराने को प्रयास करते हैं तो किरायेदार मकान मालिक को उसके ही मकान के 10 कमरों में से एक कमरा रहने को दे देता है। मकान मालिक इतना प्रताड़ित आतंकित किया जाता है कि सब कुछ भूलकर उस एक कमरे में जीवन बिताने को मजबूर हो जाता है, लेकिन मकान पर जबरन काबिज आपराधिक प्रवृत्ति के लोग, मकान के मालिक को उस एक कमरे में से भी बेदखल करके बाहर निकालने के षड़यंत्र लगातार रचते रहते हैं। क्या यह न्याय है? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40D4:8:2CA1:7054:7BFF:FEA9:6FFE (talk) 03:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of "आलन सिंह"

आलन सिंह, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is in a foreign language and exists on another Wikimedia project.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

मैं, इस लेख को प्रकाशित करना चाहता हूँ। कृपया मुझे समझाने की कोशिश करें। अगर इस पृष्ठ या लेख से विकिपीडिया को समस्या है, तो मैं, इसे हटाने के लिये तैयार हूँ। Karsan Chanda (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of आलन सिंह

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on आलन सिंह requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

अगर इस पृष्ठ से विकिपीडिया को कोई समस्या है, तो मैं, इसे हटाने के लिये तैयार हूँ। Karsan Chanda (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda,

This is the English Wikipedia and so all articles have to be written in English, for English speakers. Perhaps it would be better if you contributed to the Wikipedia in your first language. If you have questions, please visit the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I write this article in English? Karsan Chanda (talk) 05:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz:

can i talk to you? Karsan Chanda (talk) 06:40, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see pings. If you want to talk to me, come to my talk page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alan Singh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 06:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How Karsan Chanda (talk) 06:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

can i talk to you? Karsan Chanda (talk) 06:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of आलन सिंह.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, आलन सिंह., was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 06:52, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what you're trying to do by creating this article? You seem to be confused in how and why your article was moved in draftspace. If so, please continue to work on it in Draft:Alan Singh as it is not ready yet to be an actual Wikipedia article. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 06:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Twotwofourtysix:

Famous historian and author Colonel Jams Todd has mentioned the story of Meena King Old Singh in his book Anals OF Amber. In which Khohagang was told to the state and the capital of Aamer. That's why we have written King Oil Singh's article. Because more and more important information about it can come out.

Karsan Chanda (talk) 08:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Draft:AlanSingh" Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:AlanSingh Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chhuttan Lal Meena

Hello, Karsan Chanda

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Clog Wolf, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Chhuttan Lal Meena, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Clog Wolf}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Clog Wolf _Howl 06:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear @Clog Wolf: thank you very much. Now you can make changes. If there is a problem, send a message to make changes immediately. Karsan Chanda (talk) 10:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chhuttan Lal Meena moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chhuttan Lal Meena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft review:Chhuttan Lal Meena Karsan Chanda (talk) 14:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Java Hurricane 08:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal Karsan Chanda (talk) 08:18, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Karsan Chanda (talk) 08:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 12:17, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jiggyziz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Karsan Chanda have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jiggyziz ^{🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me.} 08:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:Alan Singh

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Alan Singh a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Alan Singh. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 12:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Twotwofourtysix:

The information of Alan Singh is included in the history of various sources available on Wikipedia such as Amber Nagar, Amber Fort, Kachhwaha Dynasty and Meena Tribe. Therefore, a page should be made by taking information from all those sources. Writers and news channels will be able to write about this king properly. Because of lack of information they present it in different ways. Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to submit the draft into an article in mainspace, you should click the "submit the draft for review" button in the draft, instead of just copying the draft and pasting into a brand new article, like you did. Thanks. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 13:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashawari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashawari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jiggyziz ^{🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me.} 09:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashawari

I want to write an article on wikipedia on Ashawari Mata, the family deity of Chanda dynasty of Meena tribe. Karsan Chanda (talk) 11:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ashawari Karsan Chanda (talk) 11:12, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. You may believe that someone is a hero, or that something is "unfair and shameful", but a Wikipedia article should not express that opinion, or any other opinion. JBW (talk) 11:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alan Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karsan Chanda! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nitesh003 was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nitesh003 (TALK) 03:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at WP:Teahouse, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 05:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meena clans of Rajasthan

The Meena tribe of Rajasthan ruled the whole of Rajasthan. Rulers of the tribes of Meena tribe like: - Alan Singh Meena on Jaipur and Bunda Meena on Bundi etc. Still, why our attention is not focused on the tribes of Meenas like:- Chanda, Sera, and Narla etc. I am slowly bringing to the fore the history of all the tribes of the Meena tribe of Rajasthan. So that they can also be discussed in Wikipedia. The Meenas founded Amer city and Bundi city etc. Karsan Chanda (talk) 02:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Karsan Chanda. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 19:15, 13 October 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkl talk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Thanks for contributing to the article Chanda dynasty. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 12:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Heeda Meena

The article Heeda Meena has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Needs copy-editing/clarification to be legible, particularly to indicate notability under WP:NBASIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 04:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chanda dynasty

Dear @RegentsPark: Ji, Is the article for Chanda dynasty ^[1] correct. Karsan Chanda (talk) 07:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. travfoodie.com is not a reliable source. --RegentsPark (comment) 12:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark: ^[2] Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @RegentsPark: Ji, Is the article for Chanda dynasty correct. Karsan Chanda (talk) 15:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. Not sure if it is reliable but all it says is "Chanda clan". A clan is not a dynasty. This could be a reference for Draft:Alan Singh though.--RegentsPark (comment) 15:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @RegentsPark: Ji, So please include it in the page of Alan Singh Chanda. Karsan Chanda (talk) 15:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Amer Fort History & Fact Must Know about Architecture, Tickets and Timing". Retrieved 2021-10-20.
^ "द फ़ॅन्टास्टिक ५ फोर्ट्स: [Rajasthan Is Home to Some Beautiful Forts, Here Are Some Must-See Heritage Structures]". डीएनए : डेली न्यूज़ एण्ड ऍनालिसिस. 2014-01-28. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2021-10-20 – via हाई बीम. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)

Dear @Muninnbot:, @LazyManiik: and @RegentsPark: Ji, Is Draft:Alan Singh page fit for Wikipedia now? Because his ten references have been completed. Using all these references, help me complete Alan Singh page. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 12:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alan Singh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alan Singh. Thanks! ---✨Lazy Maniik✨ 12:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LazyManiik: ^[1] ok. --Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LazyManiik: ^[2] ok. --Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@LazyManiik: ^[3]^[4]^[5] ok. --Karsan Chanda (talk) 14:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @David notMD: Ji, Is Alan Singh page fit for Wikipedia now? Because his ten references have been completed. Using all these references, help me complete Alan Singh page. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about the topic, nor any interest in working on the article. Most of the references you added were removed as not being reliable by Wikipedia standards. Others are about the fort, but barely mention Alan Singh. David notMD (talk) 14:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Unionpedia". {{cite web}}: Text "access" ignored (help)
^ "dnaindia".
^ "pinterest".
^ "swantour".
^ "historyfiles".

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lazy Maniik was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alan Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

---✨Lazy Maniik✨ 12:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Alan Singh, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alan Singh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alan Singh. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 03:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chhuttan Lal Meena has been accepted

Chhuttan Lal Meena, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 01:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moved Reference Desk query

I moved the query that you posted at Wikipedia talk:Reference desk to the place it belongs, Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities. (The place for questions is one of the Reference Desks themselves rather than the talk page.) Deor (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, When and how was the Kachwaha dynasty established?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Laxman Meena

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Laxman Meena requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram: Ji, Help me.^[1] -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:17, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark: Ji, Help me.^[2] -- Karsan Chanda (talk)•

@Hoary: Ji, Any article I write gets deleted immediately. That's why I want help from all of you. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 04:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Teahouse#Laxman_Meena. -- Hoary (talk) 06:51, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Rashtriya Janata Party

RJP is a political regional party.^[1]^[2] -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected your unterminated reference. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

Addition of travel blogs as citations

You are continuously adding unreliable sources like blogs for history pages related to History of Amber and Jaipur. Most of these sources are removed, please see WP:RS to understand what kind of sources are considered good to be added on wikipedia. Thanks. Sajaypal007 (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sajaypal007: Ji, See this page and tell if all its sources are correct?^[1]^[2] -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

December 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dhundhar. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Sajaypal007 (talk) 04:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sajaypal007: Ji, Check it out and help us.^[1] -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 02:35, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Draft:Alan Singh".

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Karsan Chanda

Thank you for creating Shiwar.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I'd suggest that you look for the village in https://censusindia.gov.in/pca/Searchdata.aspx and add the demographic data from there.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:23, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Ji, Ok. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 05:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding CPI to election articles

Hi, I've noticed that you've added CPI as the third party to the infoboxes of the Rajasthan election articles. This would be all right if they were the party which got the third-highest number of seats, but this isn't true for most of these elections. The general consensus in Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics is that it is ok to have the top three parties. If you want to add the CPI total, then please make sure to add all the parties that have won more seats than them too, and make sure they are in descending order of the seats won. Thanks. I also suggest that you join Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics. You seem to be interested in the articles that come under their scope. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Ji, I have not added CPI as a third party but as a Left party. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 02:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but it seems odd to have a party which has just one seat in the infobox while a party with more seats isn't there. Please fix this. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Ji, Also pay attention to the local elections of Rajasthan. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, beyond my interest. If you are able to find good sources for them, then you can create the articles yourself. If you start a draft article and ping me, i might be able to help you get it ready for article space. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Ji, Thanks. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Can you change my page Chanda dynast to Chanda. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 07:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chanda already exists (as a redirect). At best the name can be "Chanda (dynasty)", but i'd suggest that you leave it as it is now. Also, you can move (i.e. rename) pages yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving a page#How to move a page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Please verify the sources given by me in this article. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 06:21, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hansraj Meena moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hansraj Meena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 06:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

No changes since previous decline, except for the addition of a source that only mentions Alan Singh in passing. The draft has to be rewritten: the topic is Alan Singh, but the draft focuses entirely on Amber Fort, on a book by James Tod, and on an attack. Again, please take a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography to get an idea of how to structure a biography.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alan Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 20:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Map

Map ke bare mein kya aap samje hay? Itcouldbepossible^Talk 07:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amagarh Fort moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Amagarh Fort, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kavyansh.Singh: This article of Draft:Amagarh Fort is completely ready. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is still just a single sentence long. I feel there should be more that just mentioning where it is located. And you may submit the draft for review by clicking the blue box saying: "Submit the draft for review!". – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amagarh Fort (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

There is a combination of WP:CITEKILL – having nine sources for the single fact that the fort exists and is located in Jaipur district is very much over the top – and an almost complete lack of content in the draft. In addition to the citekill, several of the sources are not primarily about the fort. The references also lack some of the minimum information that's necessary for a proper citation; there is no info about publication dates, publishers, or authors.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amagarh Fort and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Amagarh Fort, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 10:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khogong moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khogong, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. The sources that are inappropriate in Draft:Alan Singh are equally inappropriate here, for the same reason. You have also added multiple copies of the same source, despite having had those specific sources explained at Draft talk:Alan Singh. There is not enough information to give the reader any idea of the context. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 15:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Amagarh Fort, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muninnbot: Ji, See this page and tell if all its sources are correct? -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Khogong, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remove content

"On the day of Deepawali, the Kachhwaha dynasty Dulharay attacked all the Chanda dynasty and killed them while worshiping unarmed through deceit. Even today, Chanda Rajvanshi remember their ancestors on the Martyr Day of Deepawali.[9][10][11][12]" has nothing to do with Alan Singh and should therefore be removed from the draft. David notMD (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alan Singh -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 11:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Ji, [9] आलन सिंह, [10] Ratan Singh or Alan Singh Chanda, [11] आलन सिंह, [12] Aalan Singh. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 12:04, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Ji, The sentence is not correct, or the source is not correct. do let me know. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 12:08, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know about the history. Did the massacre occur while Singh was alive? If not, the content and references for the massacre have no connection to him. David notMD (talk) 13:39, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Ji, Singh was killed in this massacre. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:44, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD: Ji, Now tell me whether these sources are habitable or not. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not my area of knowledge. David notMD (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hansraj Meena (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hansraj Meena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hansraj Meena, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 03:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tapur Dam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tapur Dam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 09:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Jarayampesha Act, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Alan Singh, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Why have I been sent this message?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khogong (February 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Maybe a notable topic, but who can tell? The draft creator has been advised about WP:REFBOMB more than once, and here is specific advice about this draft, which has apparently been ignored. Instead of removing the multiple copies of the same source and the useless sources, even more of the same has been added. Rejecting, since this is now a time sink.

bonadea contributions talk 18:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amagarh Fort (February 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The draft creator is wasting other editors' time. Instead of addressing the reasons the draft was declined (too many poor sources, almost no content in the draft), four other poor sources were thrown into the refdump but no new content was added and all the previous sources are still there.

bonadea contributions talk 18:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charan Singh Meena moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charan Singh Meena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Less Unless (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meena people

Category:Meena people Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:24, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meena

Category:Meena Karsan Chanda (talk) 10:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charan Singh Meena (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Non notable police officer

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charan Singh Meena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charan Singh Meena, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:45, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Who is the builder of Amer Fort?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: Ji. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Karsan Chanda: What does that even mean? And why did you ping me? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: If it is a computer, then how does one discuss. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 02:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't. There no reason to be discussing with a computer. I'm not seeing your confusion. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 02:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bunda Meena moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bunda Meena, is not suitable as written to remain published. You cannot keep ignoring advice and information about neutral point of view and refbombing. Please do not move this back to mainspace yourself, instrad, when you have revised it thoroughly, submit it for review.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

James Tod is still not a reliable source, and a catalogue record from a university library is also not a source. The title of the draft is Alan Singh, but the draft contains no info about him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alan Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 22:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khogong (March 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Do not resubmit this. See the last reviewer's comment.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bunda Meena (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft still has the exact same sources as when it was declined a few days ago. None of them meets WP:RS for a biography of a historical figure, and most of them say essentially the same thing. All other problems mentioned in previous AfC decline and comments are also still there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bunda Meena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bunda Meena, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Someone, who keeps information about old coins., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ip

Delete the meena mina controversy article. As meena mina matsya mena meenanda all are synonymous of one tribe only. Dont reply to this ip. 2405:205:108F:9F18:669A:15C9:F31F:3632 (talk) 03:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meena-Mina controversy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meena-Mina controversy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 20:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chanda

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chanda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can any one my friend help me by improving this article?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Edit summary

When you edit WP-articles, please use them. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meena-Mina controversy (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Multiple issues:

no attempt to explain what the "controversy" is about
written from some undefined point of view
none of the citations includes even a minimum of info about the source, and about half of them don't show the actual title
no changes to the draftified text, only a couple of added sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meena-Mina controversy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Meena-Mina controversy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is Meena Aryan or Dravidian?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two cites of the same PTI piece, and two primary sources (of which one is effectively dead), is not enough to establish notability. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bunda Meena (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the issues brought up before have been addressed. The only change since the most recent decline is the addition of yet another source that does not verify the content and is not a useful source for a biography of a historical figure. If this is resubmitted yet again without actually fixing the problems with irrelevant content, non-neutral language, and refbombing with non-RS sources with incorrect titles, it will probably be rejected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bunda Meena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bunda Meena, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meena Tribe Marriage Act moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meena Tribe Marriage Act, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Sources that do not verify the content, and sources that are not appropriate for other reasons, should not be added.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 10:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of Scheduled Tribes in Gujarat

added links pointing to Chaudhari and Kukna

List of Scheduled Tribes in Rajasthan

added a link pointing to Kukna

Meena

added a link pointing to German

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Scheduled Tribes in Gujarat

added links pointing to Chaudhari and Kukna

List of Scheduled Tribes in Rajasthan

added a link pointing to Kukna

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Make Bhil people's page with the name Bhil., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Talk to improve the page., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Karsan Chanda! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Are both Meena tribe and Matsya tribe same?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tapur Dam

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tapur Dam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hansraj Meena

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hansraj Meena, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amagarh Fort

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amagarh Fort, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

M

But scholars disagree on them being a Proto Dravidian tribe.

delete this line. Don't reply. 2409:4052:4E0C:63DA:880C:1FF:FEC7:2800 (talk) 11:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scholars claim them to be an Indo-Aryan tribe. delete this.

M are in real Proto Dravidian people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4052:4E0C:63DA:880C:1FF:FEC7:2800 (talk) 12:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[7/16, 17:53] M: इतिहास का अध्ययन करें तो *अग्निकुंड की चारों शाखाएं परमार, प्रतिहार, चालुक्य और चौहान गुर्जर थीं।* विदेशी आक्रांताओं से लड़ने और आर्यावर्त की रक्षा के लिए राजवंशों ने अग्नि के समक्ष शपथ ली थी। उन्होंने कहा कि वर्तमान में यशराज बैनर द्वारा बनाई जा रही फिल्म गुर्जरों को अपमानित करती है, क्योंकि हिंदू सम्राट पृथ्वीराज चौहान को राजपूत जाति से जोड़कर प्रसारित किया जा रहा है। उन्होंने कहा कि विदेशी साहित्यकारों ने सभी अग्निवंशियों को गुर्जर माना हैं। विदेशी लेखक जयानक ने अपनी पुस्तक *पृथ्वीराज विजय महाकाव्यम में स्पष्ट लिखा है कि पृथ्वीराज गुर्जर थे। इनके अलावा बारहवीं ही शताब्दी की लिखी पुस्तकों में भी उन्हें गुजर्र सिद्ध किया गया है। उन्होंने कहा कि यदि पृथ्वीराज चौहान को फिल्म में गुजर्र योद्धा एवं कुशल शासक नहीं बताया गया, तो गुर्जर समाज फिल्म का राष्ट्रीय स्तर पर विरोध की रणनीति तय करेगा।* इस दौरान महासभा के जिलाध्यक्ष रवि चौहान, प्रदेश उपाध्यक्ष अवनीश चौहान, जिला पंचायत सदस्य अनुज चौहान, जीवा, अमित, राजेश प्रधान, शिवकुमार, अंकुर आदि भी मौजूद थे।

https://www.amarujala.com/uttar-pradesh/shamli/81547401704-shamli-news [7/16, 17:53] M:

According to a number of scholars, the Agnikula class were originally Gurjaras in which the Chauhans were a prominent clan of Gurjaras (or Gurjars)^[1]^[2]^[3]

[7/16, 17:53] M: The old medieval name of Rajasthan was "Gurjaratra" (which meant "the country ruled or protected by the Gurjars or Gujjars", till late Mughal era.

[7/16, 17:53] M: One more fact, Gujarat : The Gujarat State took it’s name from the Gurjars, the land of the Gurjars, who ruled the area during medieval times.

DONT REPLY.

The civilized class used to address him as Bhil.?? him?

Meenas are most civilized race itself.

okay they are sub group of Bheels. This is ok.

Dnt reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:1481:A157:5CAA:82FF:FE1E:7E0 (talk) 03:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Sir Jervoise Athelstane Baines (1912). Ethnography: castes and tribes, Volume 2,Part 5. K.J. Trübner. p. 31. sun and fire worshiping huna or Gurjara was converted into the blue blood of rajputana, and became the forefathers of the Sisodia, Chahaun, Parmar, Parihar or calukya,..
^ Hoernle, A. F. Rudolf (October 1904). "Some Problems of Ancient Indian History". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. XXIII. Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland: 651. Retrieved 2011-12-16. By that marriage Haarsha had contracted an alliance with the dominant race of the Gurjaras, of whom the Chohans were a prominent clan.
^ Sharma, Dasharatha (1975). Early Chauhān dynasties: a study of Chauhān political history, Chauhān political institutions, and life in the Chauhān dominions, from 800 to 1316 A.D. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 280. ISBN 978-0-8426-0618-9. According to a number of scholars, the Agnikula class were originally Gurjaras.

Rajasthan Adivasi Meena Seva Sangh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rajasthan Adivasi Meena Seva Sangh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:50, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charan Singh Meena

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charan Singh Meena, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources is useful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alan Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Chanda. bonadea contributions talk 09:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mhair moved to draftspace

This article needs to be longer than a six word sentence. Please expand it prior to resubmitting for namespace.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mhair (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make sure that the references actually verify the information where they are placed, and please include at least a minimum of bibliographical info. Don't link to search strings in books, but always provide a page number (much more important than a Google Books link, which is optional) Raj era sources are not used in articles about ethnic or social groups.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mhair (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeverTry4Me was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The content is too short for such an article. Further, infobox conflicts with context, and the sources section is not enclyopedic. Read WP:REFB

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 06:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mhair (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khogong (August 5)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Greenman was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: User is wasting reviewer's time, making no attempt to address previous concerns.

Greenman (talk) 11:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tapur Dam

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tapur Dam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 10:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amagarh Fort

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amagarh Fort".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:33, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mhair (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The points made in the first decline notice have not been addressed. It is slightly absurd to make claims about current population or customs when the sources are 100-150 years old.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roads in Sawai Madhopur district moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Roads in Sawai Madhopur district, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 01:54, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to State Highway 122 (Rajasthan) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sumanuil. 03:48, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bunda Meena

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bunda Meena, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Meena Tribe Marriage Act

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meena Tribe Marriage Act, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Meena-Mina controversy

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meena-Mina controversy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, roadfan!

Welcome Karsan Chanda!

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Connecting

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you would like to chat with other editors, you can join the Wikimedia Community Discord server. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions.

Happy editing! Signed, Rs chen 7754 02:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Meena Empire

The article Meena Empire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unverifiable, there are no useful sources about a Meena Empire (the source given uses Mina, but doesn't call it an empire anyway)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rajasthan Adivasi Meena Seva Sangh

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajasthan Adivasi Meena Seva Sangh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chanda dynasty moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chanda dynasty, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 19:28, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chanda dynasty (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chanda dynasty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 17:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rajasthan Adivasi Meena Seva Sangh

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rajasthan Adivasi Meena Seva Sangh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mhair

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mhair, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Alan Singh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alan Singh. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 18:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Dhundhar. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RSN

Please read the box at the top of WP:RSN before posting questions there where it tells you how to pose questions about sources. It is unhelpful to simply post "Is X article/book/source reliable?" Reliable for what? What you need to do instead is to cite the article at which the source is being used, the specific statement in that article that the source is being used to support, and the specific text in the source that supports the statement in the article. Banks Irk (talk) 23:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mhair (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wikieditor019 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mhair and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikieditor019 (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mhair has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mhair. Thanks! Wikieditor019 (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Public Works Department of Rajasthan moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Public Works Department of Rajasthan, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Roads in Sawai Madhopur district

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roads in Sawai Madhopur district, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

M

immediately remove pic in minas hindoo of low caste. Meena is. a tribe not a caste. kindly remove it immediately 2409:40D4:A:DD38:1C20:A8FF:FE21:5798 (talk) 12:28, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

don't reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40D4:A:DD38:1C20:A8FF:FE21:5798 (talk) 12:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

immediately remove pic in minas hindoo of low caste. Meena is. a tribe not a caste. kindly remove it immediately — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40D4:1006:43A:F0CB:A7FF:FEAC:F87C (talk) 03:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Natwara moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Natwara, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natwara has been accepted

Natwara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Karsan Chanda. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 12:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Bhil

Hello,

what are the major religious groups among the Bhil? Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 20:24, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Religion of The Bhils-a Sociological Analysis -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 01:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarcelles: There is an attempt to take them towards Hindutva by researching on the basis of changes after Sanskritization in each tribal communities. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 04:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bhairavlal Kala Badal

The article Bhairavlal Kala Badal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khogong (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khogong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Karsan Chanda. Thank you for your work on Bhairavlal Kala Badal. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

in the infobox please merge consequtive terms if they were from the same constituency

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Thanks for drawing attention but how it will happen please try to tell. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 10:51, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've done this: [1]. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Thanks. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your sourcing questions at WP:RSN

In the past 9 months, you've started a dozen new discussions at WP:RSN.[2] There is no problem with that whatsoever, as I see that you are frequently working on new articles where new article review may ask questions about sourcing. RSN is the place to ask those questions. But, after a dozen questions over 9 months, you should by now be familiar with the box at the top of the RSN page which asks that any request include:

Source. The book or web page being used as the source. For a book, include the author, title, publisher, page number, etc. For an online source, please include links.

Article. The Wikipedia article(s) in which the source is being used.

Content. The exact statement(s) in the article that the source supports. Please supply a diff, or put the content inside block quotes.

It is not helpful to the editors who frequent RSN to simply ask "Is X reliable?" We need context to answer, and should not have to do our own research to discover why you are asking the questions. Please try to be more complete when you post these questions. Thank you. Banks Irk (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rawat Saraswat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rawat Saraswat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawat Saraswat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paradoctor (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-protected edit request on this page

Hello - I notice you've placed an extended-protected edit request on this page, although your user page isn't protected. Is there something I might be able to help you with? Tollens (talk) 03:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IP. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where, specifically? On this page? Tollens (talk) 03:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: See -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. ~~Yeah, semi-protection would appear to perhaps be appropriate here.~~ I see you've put in a request for page protection of your userpage - this might not be what you're looking for as there doesn't appear to be any disruption there. Were you instead looking for this talk page protected? Tollens (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~You can feel free to delete those comments if you'd like as they appear, by the way. I could remove the ones that are here now for you, if you'd like?~~ Tollens (talk) 03:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The comments appear to be expressing concern with some image at Meena, however, but don't make it clear which here or at the article's talk page. Are you aware of the particular objection they're raising? Tollens (talk) 04:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: Yes, I know he is objecting to this photo. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 04:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see an actual discussion anywhere - have you engaged with them on the topic of the image's inclusion at any point? Tollens (talk) 05:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: No. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 05:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion would seem to me to be a logical first step, then. Tollens (talk) 05:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tollens: He is not ready to discuss. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 06:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Roads in Sawai Madhopur district

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roads in Sawai Madhopur district".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alan Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NP83 (talk) 19:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not ping me

Your questions to me at RSN are unrelated to RSN. Please do not ping me with questions about issues at AFD. Your article will be deleted or not based on whether it is notable or not. I am not interested in weighing in on that question. Also, I have reminded you about the instructions at RSN, as have other editors. After 3 years of editing, over 1K edits and dozens of questions at RSN, you should not be posturing as a new, inexperienced editor. Review WP:Competence is required. My patience is running thin. Banks Irk (talk) 21:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not cite sources you haven't seen!

At the Alan Singh AFD, you cited some sources and then later, when quotes were requested, said that you didn't have access to them. I also had found earlier that you had added claims to the Alan Singh article that were not supported by the sources you cited.

This is not ok! You should cite sources only if you they are reliable and you have verified that they support the claim they are being cited for. Citing sources that you cannot see satisfies neither of those requirements. And if you continue to do so you are liable to be blocked or topic-banned from wikipedia. Abecedare (talk) 16:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Abecedare: There is nothing like that, I can see only a small part of it. I thought there is an expert on Wikipedia who can explain clearly by looking at it, that's why I said so, but you took it in the wrong sense. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 23:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karsan, in case you missed my question on the AFD, I'll re-post it here: can you tell me the page number where the quote you added to the Alan Singh article and the AFD appear in Kooiman's book? I ask because the quote raises several red-flags for me. Abecedare (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Karsan Chanda I'd also like to see it. Doug Weller talk 11:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have requested an admin to review your editing and source misrepresentation. If you wish, you can add your comment at Bishonen's talkpage. Abecedare (talk) 01:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Abecedare (talk) 16:05, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Abecedare: Which page are you talking about? -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Khoh

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Khoh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Response to posts on my page

Karsan Chanda, I see two problems with your editing:

Firstly, you seem to have jumped in the deep end of Wikipedia, by creating articles. The warnings on your page, and especially your very recent edit here (showing both that you don't understand the problem, and that you use a wrong edit summary of "fixed typo") demonstrate that you are still far from ready to do this. I strongly advise you to take smaller steps, and to learn Wikipedia's principles by improving existing articles. Your creation of Alan Sing, all the comments about your resubmission of it without improvements here, and your input in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Singh all show that you're not ready, and that many experienced users have spent time advising you, without much effect.

Secondly, your use of sources is subpar. This recent warning from Abecedare and your responses to it are especially concerning.

You have replied to Abecedare on my own page that there is no need to worry about you, because when a new editor comes, he makes mistakes because he does not know the legal claims of Wikipedia, you have tried to see almost all my mistakes, thank you very much for that, but your opinion about me Is wrong because I try to correct back the mistakes made by me too so you don't have to worry you can trust me without worrying. I can't agree. My review shows in the first place that you are not that new; you have been here for 2 years 3 months and made 3,139 edits. As for correcting back your mistakes, unfortunately it looks like you don't always understand these mistakes even when they are pointed out and explained. Could this be a language issue? If Hindi is your native language, I urge you to contribute to the Hindi Wikipedia. Meanwhile, I'm afraid I have felt obliged to topic ban you from the topics of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. See below. If you still wish to contribute to the English Wikipedia, you can practice your editing skills in other areas before returning to the very sensitive India-Pakistan-Afghanistan topics. Also, you are free to edit the other English sister projects. Finally, please understand what a topic ban is: it means that while the ban is in effect, you are not allowed to make any edits to any pages related to either India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan on the English Wikipedia. If you do so, you will be sanctioned. Bishonen | tålk 09:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions related to either India, Pakistan or Afghanistan

You have been sanctioned for persistent difficulties in creating articles and in using sources, despite advice from many experienced users.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at #Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 09:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bishonen: Would you mind telling me which is the page for which my account is blocked. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked at all, Karsan Chanda. There is an important difference between blocks and bans: blocks prevent you, in a technical way, from editing a particular page or all pages, or whatever you have been blocked from. Bans don't prevent anything, they merely forbid you from certain actions, and it's then your own responsibility to not do the forbidden actions. Your ban states that you are not allowed to make any edits to any pages related to either India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan. If you make such edits anyway, you may be blocked, as a sanction for violating the ban. All right? Looking at your recent edits for examples, you are from now on not allowed to edit Khoh, Alan Singh, Draft:Chanda dynasty and so on. These are just a few examples. You're not allowed to edit their talkpages either, or to engage in any discussions related to India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan, for instance on user talkpages. If you want to make an edit but you're uncertain if it's allowed, please ask first. You can ask me or another admin. I hope this is clear. Please ask again if you still don't understand. Bishonen | tålk 14:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Please don't violate your topic ban

Hi, Karsan Chanda. You may appeal your ban, or ask me for clarification of your ban, but you may not otherwise post anything connected with India, which you have been topic banned from. What you posted here is nothing to do with appealing or asking about your ban; it's just something about India, and about sources. (I don't understand why you call it a "reply" either; it doesn't seem to reply to anything anybody has said above,) Doing it on my page doesn't help; you don't get to do it anywhere on Wikipedia. Please don't do it again, or you will be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 16:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, Bishonen. I have learned English so will you help me? -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 07:11, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no. You are now indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. See your userpage. Bishonen | tålk 09:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Meena-Mina controversy

Hello, Karsan Chanda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Meena-Mina controversy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Karsan Chanda

Buddy can you provide your Email ID, so we can connect. I want to have a discussion with you. TheRealAnalysis (talk) 05:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chanda dynasty (May 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Toddst1 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chanda dynasty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toddst1 (talk) 22:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Laxminarayan Jharwal

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Laxminarayan Jharwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Public Works Department of Rajasthan

Hello, Karsan Chanda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Public Works Department of Rajasthan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for assistance regarding my account

Hi, Doug Weller. Can you help me? -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 08:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How? Doug Weller talk 08:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller. I was banned because I don't know English but now I have learned English. Therefore, I would like your help in removing the block and ban of my account. -- Karsan Chanda (talk) 08:20, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have two problems. One I failed to notify you about for which I apologise but if you look at your user page I noted it there. Also see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Karsan Chanda/Archive. The notice I've added below tells you how to appeal. Unless you are successful there's now way of appealing your topic ban by User:Bishonen/ Doug Weller talk 09:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

REMOVE BLOCK 2409:40D4:1006:6FA9:74AD:A3FF:FEA9:41F5 (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 09:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meena clans has been nominated for merging

Category:Meena clans has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meena people has been nominated for deletion

Category:Meena people has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Doug Weller talk 17:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Amer Fort History & Fact Must Know about Architecture, Tickets and Timing". Retrieved 2021-10-20.

[DNA-2] "द फ़ॅन्टास्टिक ५ फोर्ट्स: [Rajasthan Is Home to Some Beautiful Forts, Here Are Some Must-See Heritage Structures]". डीएनए : डेली न्यूज़ एण्ड ऍनालिसिस. 2014-01-28. Archived from the original on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2021-10-20 – via हाई बीम. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)

[3] "Unionpedia". {{cite web}}: Text "access" ignored (help)

[4] "dnaindia".

[5] "pinterest".

[6] "swantour".

[7] "historyfiles".

[8] "The government agreed, yes! Cases of assault on government employees increased wildly".

[9] "Laxman Meena".

[10] "Rajasthan: Voting today, all eyes on important seats".

[11] "Assembly election great coverage: Here caste is the factor of victory".

[12] "Great Monuments of India".

[13] The Fantastic 5 Forts: Rajasthan Is Home to Some Beautiful Forts, Here Are Some Must-See Heritage Structures.

[14] "Draft:Alan Singh".

[15] Sir Jervoise Athelstane Baines (1912). Ethnography: castes and tribes, Volume 2,Part 5. K.J. Trübner. p. 31. sun and fire worshiping huna or Gurjara was converted into the blue blood of rajputana, and became the forefathers of the Sisodia, Chahaun, Parmar, Parihar or calukya,..

[Royal_Asiatic_Society_of_Great_Britain_and_Ireland_1834_651-16] Hoernle, A. F. Rudolf (October 1904). "Some Problems of Ancient Indian History". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. XXIII. Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland: 651. Retrieved 2011-12-16. By that marriage Haarsha had contracted an alliance with the dominant race of the Gurjaras, of whom the Chohans were a prominent clan.

[Dasharatha_Sharma_1975_280-17] Sharma, Dasharatha (1975). Early Chauhān dynasties: a study of Chauhān political history, Chauhān political institutions, and life in the Chauhān dominions, from 800 to 1316 A.D. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 280. ISBN 978-0-8426-0618-9. According to a number of scholars, the Agnikula class were originally Gurjaras.

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]

[1]

[1]

[2]

[3]

Speedy deletion nomination of "आलन सिंह"

Speedy deletion nomination of आलन सिंह

@Liz:

Alan Singh moved to draftspace

Speedy deletion nomination of आलन सिंह.

Proposed deletion of Chhuttan Lal Meena

Chhuttan Lal Meena moved to draftspace

Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal moved to draftspace

September 2021

About Draft:Alan Singh

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashawari

Ashawari

Neutral point of view

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (October 1)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal (October 2)

October 2021

Category:Meena clans of Rajasthan

Talkback: you've got messages!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal (October 15)

October 2021

Proposed deletion of Heeda Meena

Chanda dynasty

AfC notification: Draft:Alan Singh has a new comment

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (October 21)

Your thread has been archived

AfC notification: Draft:Alan Singh has a new comment

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chhuttan Lal Meena has been accepted

Moved Reference Desk query

Your thread has been archived

Speedy deletion nomination of Laxman Meena

Rashtriya Janata Party

Addition of travel blogs as citations

December 2021

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Adding CPI to election articles

Hansraj Meena moved to draftspace

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (January 20)

Map

Amagarh Fort moved to draftspace

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amagarh Fort (January 27)

Khogong moved to draftspace

Your thread has been archived

Your thread has been archived

Remove content

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hansraj Meena (February 6)

Tapur Dam moved to draftspace

Your thread has been archived

Your thread has been archived

Your thread has been archived

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khogong (February 11)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amagarh Fort (February 11)

Charan Singh Meena moved to draftspace

Category:Meena people

Category:Meena

Categories

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charan Singh Meena (February 24)

Your thread has been archived

Bunda Meena moved to draftspace

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Singh (March 4)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khogong (March 5)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bunda Meena (March 9)

Your thread has been archived

ip

Meena-Mina controversy moved to draftspace

Concern regarding Draft:Chanda

Your thread has been archived

Concern regarding Draft:Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal

Help:Edit summary

Your submission at Articles for creation: Meena-Mina controversy (April 2)

Your thread has been archived

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshmi Narayan Jharwal (April 5)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bunda Meena (May 3)

Meena Tribe Marriage Act moved to draftspace

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Your thread has been archived

Your thread has been archived

Your thread has been archived

Concern regarding Draft:Tapur Dam

Concern regarding Draft:Hansraj Meena