User talk:Hawkeye7/Archive 2017
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Hawkeye7. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives: |
2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 |
RfA candidate | S | O | N | S % | Status | Ending (UTC) | Time left | Dups? | Report |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worm That Turned | 179 | 1 | 2 | 99 | Open | 09:47, 18 November 2024 | 5 days, 18 hours | no | report |
Military history WikiProject |
---|
Articles for review |
See the full list of open tasks |
Military historian of the Year
The Silver Wiki | ||
For "[your] ongoing efforts to improve our coverage of the Manhattan Project and nearly everything associated with it (not to mention [your] efforts as a project coordinator and continued support in the form of MILHIST bot, and help improving other articles through our review processes etc)" I have the pleasure of presenting you with this Silver Wiki. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject, TomStar81 (Talk) 09:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC) |
- Completing the Aussie trifecta with Rupert and PM -- great work, Hawkeye. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- Congratulations, Hawkeye. Well deserved. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- Seconded. Well deserved mate and happy new year! Irondome (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year Hawkeye7!
Have a prosperous, productive and wonderful New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Hawkeye7!
Hawkeye7,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 08:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
2016 Year in Review Awards
The Epic Barnstar | ||
For your contributions to history related articles in 2016, I hereby present you with this Epic Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC) |
The World War Barnstar | ||
For your contributions to articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Douglas MacArthur's escape from the Philippines, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which are related to World War II, I hereby present you with this World War Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC) |
The Nuclear Barnstar | ||
For your contributions to articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which are related to nuclear warfare, I hereby present you with this Nuclear Warfare Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC) |
The Featured Article Medal | ||
For your outstanding contributions to the Featured Articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Douglas MacArthur's escape from the Philippines, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which obtained Featured Article status in 2016, I hereby present you with this Featured Article Medal. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC) |
Request for comment/review
Hi Hawkeye7. Just letting you know I have a trifecta of M2M articles up for review: Shades of Purple is nominated for GA, M2M (band) is nominated for peer review (I intend to nominate it for GA once the peer review is closed), and The Big Room is nominated for DYK. I thought you might be interested in at least having a look at the improvements to the articles, if not commenting/reviewing one. I would be most happy to review one of your active nominations in return if you like. Have a nice day. :) Freikorp (talk) 07:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
TFA
Thank you for the Clinton Engineer Works, "the Manhattan Project's largest facility"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jean Tatlock
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jean Tatlock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 凰兰时罗 -- 凰兰时罗 (talk) 04:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Quarterly Milhist Reviewing Award: Oct to Dec 16
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 3 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period October to December 2016. Your ongoing efforts to support Wikipedia's quality content processes are greatly appreciated. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for S-50 (Manhattan Project)
On 9 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article S-50 (Manhattan Project), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Manhattan Project's liquid thermal diffusion plant was the only production-scale plant of its kind ever built? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/S-50 (Manhattan Project). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, S-50 (Manhattan Project)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 00:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now use datasets on Commons. You can see an example that is using this source. [1]
- There is a new opt-in beta feature of a wikitext mode for the visual editor. You can try it out.
- When you update a page with translations on wikis with the Translate extension the existing translations will be marked as outdated instead of removed. [2]
- The new version of MediaWiki was released to all wikis last week (calendar).
- MoodBar has been removed from the Wikimedia wikis. [3]
- The
live
option for the Tipsy notice tool has been removed. Gadgets and user scripts which use it need to be updated. [4]
Problems
- Editors who use Firefox 50 might get logged out or fail to save their edits. This is because of a browser bug. Until this is fixed you can enter
about:config
in the address bar and setnetwork.cookie.maxPerHost
to 5000. Firefox 50 is the current version of the Firefox. [5]
Changes this week
- There is no new version of MediaWiki this week because of the Wikimedia Developer Summit.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)
The article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:S-50 (Manhattan Project) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)
The article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:S-50 (Manhattan Project) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Salt Wells Pilot Plant
On 11 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salt Wells Pilot Plant, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on two occasions, aircraft carrying explosives from the Salt Wells Pilot Plant were struck by lightning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salt Wells Pilot Plant. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Salt Wells Pilot Plant), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 00:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- In this diff you added a sentence:
- Lauritsen pushed for a decision, and in April it was decided to use the meting and casting method.
- Was that supposed to be "melting and casting"? Shenme (talk) 01:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Yes. Thanks for that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jean Tatlock
The article Jean Tatlock you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jean Tatlock for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 凰兰时罗 -- 凰兰时罗 (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Hawkeye7, may I trouble you for a favor? I noticed that you are very experienced with GA nominations both on reviewing and being reviewed sides. Could you possible review my recent review of Jean Tatlock nomination? I'd like to know how my efforts conform to the "standards", and what were strong and weak points. If you feel you'll be more candid in private communication, please shoot me a short email. Thanks, 凰兰时罗 (talk) 18:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think you did a good job. I had no argument with your suggestions, but in some cases I was unsure about what you wanted. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Did it become clear eventually, or you are still having black spots on some of my suggestions? 凰兰时罗 (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- First of all I would like to say that the article is better for our interaction, which is all-important. Secondly, resolving problems like giving the wrong impression, or implementing NPOV invariably require another pair of eyes, which is why I put the article up for review. Such problems are hard to spot because I know what I meant when I wrote it. On the other hand, I sometimes employ the full force of the English language to address issues without noting them explicitly or to skate over controversial points by being ambiguous. Your suggestion to add the suicide note was most welcome, but I suspect is what you were referring to by "already moved beyond GA criteria". Jean Tatlock is as good as I could get it but I don't think it will ever proceed any further. I often submit articles which have been written as featured articles (although they may be unlikely to get there due to the restrictions at FAC) and reviewers often get carried away and start reviewing as it it were a FAC. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for a more detailed explanation. I completely agree with your approach, i.e. with the benefits of a second opinion. Here is what I meant by "already moved beyond GA criteria". I believe that a reviewer should not try to impose her/his style beyond GA criteria. So, when I see an issue, I'm often tempted to fix it in a particular way that is congruent with my style. However, I remind myself that my approach is no panacea, and the article's editor(s) can do the fixing in a way they are most comfortable with. In essence, by writing this phrase I was stopping myself from being too prescriptive. BTW I would apply this same logic to FA criteria. I think that there are infinitely many ways to write a featured article which will (a) satisfy all the criteria (b) will be enjoyed by the readers (c) will make the editor(s) and wiki-community proud. So, from my standpoint, a good GA/FA reviewer knows how to separate what objectively needs to be done from what he/she would do to achieve that. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- First of all I would like to say that the article is better for our interaction, which is all-important. Secondly, resolving problems like giving the wrong impression, or implementing NPOV invariably require another pair of eyes, which is why I put the article up for review. Such problems are hard to spot because I know what I meant when I wrote it. On the other hand, I sometimes employ the full force of the English language to address issues without noting them explicitly or to skate over controversial points by being ambiguous. Your suggestion to add the suicide note was most welcome, but I suspect is what you were referring to by "already moved beyond GA criteria". Jean Tatlock is as good as I could get it but I don't think it will ever proceed any further. I often submit articles which have been written as featured articles (although they may be unlikely to get there due to the restrictions at FAC) and reviewers often get carried away and start reviewing as it it were a FAC. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Did it become clear eventually, or you are still having black spots on some of my suggestions? 凰兰时罗 (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think you did a good job. I had no argument with your suggestions, but in some cases I was unsure about what you wanted. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Template:Round8
The current template is somewhat screwed up. One of the lines contains a break, which ruins the aesthetics of the bracket. See here. It's specifically on that third semi finalist entry spot. Any thoughts? - J man708 (talk) 03:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- It works fine for me but I have a 3rdplace=yes card. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- I've adjusted your article (yes, I know) Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm so confused at what caused that! - J man708 (talk) 04:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
- I've adjusted your article (yes, I know) Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Hawkeye7, I sent you an email. Go Phightins! 04:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Page mover
Would you like the page mover user right? I noticed your comment at ORCP that you'd prefer not to fiddle with redirects when moving pages, and that user right helps in many of those situations. You obviously qualify. ~ Rob13Talk 22:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- Yes! I feel embarassed. I wasn't aware of this. I remember voting for it, but hadn't noticed that it had been created. It would have come in handy this morning. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for SS Broompark (1939)
On 14 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Broompark (1939), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in June 1940 the SS Broompark brought French scientists, heavy water, and diamonds to Britain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Broompark (1939). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Broompark (1939)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 00:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Bug report
Thx for the bot, it's very helpful. See WT:TFA#Recently featured again (not the part about Jan 4, the rest of it). I initially thought this wouldn't be an issue because it would be infrequent and I could fix it by hand ... and I can, but it's happening more often than I remembered that part of a title is italicized and part isn't, and I keep forgetting to do it. If this is going to be a pain, don't worry about it. - Dank (push to talk) 13:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
S-50
Thanks for the note about S-50 (Manhattan Project). Nice work! --Orlady (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Were back and a full review is needed. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Clive Ward
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Clive Ward you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now upload WebP files to Commons. [6]
Problems
- video2commons was down for two weeks. This was because of a problem with Commons video transcoders. It is now back up. [7]
Changes this week
- There is a new magic word called
{{PAGELANGUAGE}}
. It returns the language of the page you are at. This can be used on wikis with more than one language to make it easier for translators. [8] - When an admin blocks a user or deletes or protects a page they give a reason why. They can now get suggestions when they write. The suggestions will be based on the messages in the dropdown menu. [9]
- You will be able to use
<chem>
to write chemical formulas. Before you could use<ce>
.<ce>
should be replaced by<chem>
. [10] - You now can add exceptions for categories which shouldn't be shown on Special:UncategorizedCategories. The list is at MediaWiki:Uncategorized-categories-exceptionlist. [11]
- The "Columns" and "Rows" settings will be removed from the Editing tab in Preferences. If you wish to keep what the "Rows" setting did you can add this code to your personal CSS:
#wpTextbox1 { height: 50em; }
You can change the number50
to make it look like you want to. [12] - Sometimes edits in MediaWiki by mistake are shown coming from private IP addresses such as 127.0.0.1. Edits and other contributions logged to these IP addresses will be blocked and shown the reason from MediaWiki:Softblockrangesreason. This should not affect most users. Bots and other tools running on Wikimedia Labs, including Tool Labs will receive a "blocked" error if they try to edit without being logged in. [13]
- When you edit with the visual editor categories will be on the top of the page options menu. [14]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 January. It will be on all wikis from 19 January (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on January 17 at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
Your Rio Photo
Just wanted to drop a quick note, great photo of you from Rio but if you attend a future major games event please don't post a photo that includes your accreditation/credentials. SportsMedGuy (talk) 19:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Mary Jackson
Hi! I saw your edit to Mary Jackson (engineer), and was just curious what your change accomplished. The edit summary says "rm annoying error messages," but I wasn't seeing errors on the previous version. I looked at the documentation of {{citation}} and still have no idea what ref=none
does. GorillaWarfare (talk) 07:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- The error messages I got looked like warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFCzarneckiJackson1958. By default the {{citation}} template creates an anchor equivalent to that created by
ref=harv
when you are using {{cite journal}} or {{cite book}}. But with themref=none
(ie do not create an anchor) is the default. The anchors are normally used with references; the {{harvnb}} and {{sfn}} templates create nice links to them. So that when you click on the link in an inline reference, it takes you down to the book in the references section and highlights the book. You don't need them in a list of publications, because there are no inline references to them. (Note that I didn't add one to the journal citation, because it didn't need it.) Theref=none
form is in the documentation of {{citation}}: see Template:Citation#Anchored citations. - As to why I can see the error message and you can't, the reason is that I seem to have a Javascript that runs a JQuery to spot these errors called User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js It's been in User:Hawkeye7/common.js since 13 November 2011; I guess I had forgotten all about it. It normally warns me that a reference is wrong. I should have marked the change as "minor", since it is invisible to the readers. My apologies for that.
- Great job on the article! Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- (Belated) thanks for the explanation! I'll have to look into that script... Thanks for the DYK review also! GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for John Challens
On 21 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Challens, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the British scientist John Challens received the American Medal of Freedom for his work on the V-1 flying bomb and the V-2 rocket? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Challens. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Challens), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 00:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can see a list of the templates on a page you edit with the visual editor. [15]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 January. It will be on all wikis from 26 January (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Herb Chen
Hey H., Noting your interest in physics biographies, I wonder if you might have a quick look at some point at the article I have been working on the past month: Herbert H. Chen. There are still some missing pieces (I have an inquiry in on Chen's dissertation title), but mostly I am sometimes foggy on some of the technicalities of Wikipedia articles. The Chen article is a little challenging - I knew him and by all accounts he was a brilliant and accomplished physicist; but he was struck down by leukemia at age 45 - hence did not become as notable as he might have. Cheers and thanks for all of your hard work on articles! Bdushaw (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- The main thing is that everything needs to be referenced. I have added his doctoral thesis. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Jean Tatlock
Hello! Your submission of Jean Tatlock at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew D. (talk) 18:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Clive Ward
The article John Clive Ward you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Clive Ward for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 02:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hawkeye7. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Editor's index to Wikipedia
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Champion3682 (talk) 06:05, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
Changes this week
- ElectronPdfService will be enabled by default on Meta and German Wikipedia. This is a new way to get articles as PDF files you can download. It will come to more wikis later. [17]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from January 31. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from February 1. It will be on all wikis from February 2 (calendar).
Future changes
- The Community Tech team will develop more tools to handle harassment of Wikimedia editors. The goal is to give the communities better tools to find, report and evaluate harassment. They will also work on more effective blocking tools. [18][19]
- The Wikimedia technical community is doing a Developer Wishlist survey. Developers can propose ideas before 31 January 23:59 UTC. This is soon.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Feynman
My only remaining question is about that photo with the Swedish PD tag, but it's not a show stopper so I'll ask it here. Given the response by the other person who said it can go to Commons, do you now agree or disagree with him? ie, should it go to Commons or not? HalfGig talk 20:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- The image is definitely in the PD. Copyright expired in Sweden, therefore also in the US. But I went through this with James Chadwick. In that case, another (but slightly different) photograph of Chadwick was taken at the same session, but it was published in the UK, and therefore was not in the PD. We had a debate on Commons and the image was kept. Then one of their cowboy admins just deleted it anyway. So the rule is: don't move images to Commons if don't have to. If we do have to, we can substitute the OTRS image (the one in the Physics section) that everyone else uses, but I'd rather not.
- It's two other images that are problematic; the one of the CalTech bookstore and the Feynman Lectures on Physics. They are on Commons, so all we can do is remove them from the article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm no super image license expert, but I'd lean to keeping those two in the article. HalfGig talk 21:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for James N. Post III
On 1 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James N. Post III, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Major General James N. Post III flew over 4,000 hours in the F-16 Falcon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James N. Post III. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, James N. Post III), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I read an article on the web that said this is the most viewed article on wiki, or at least most viewed bio. It's also a Top level article at WP:Plants. I was wondering what you think it'd take to get it to FA. Or as an alternative, who you'd think would be good to take a quick look at it. And congrats on getting Feynman to FA! HalfGig talk 15:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Request
This past July you reviewed and promoted the article on SPARS to a GA. Its talk page indicates this, but the article page does not. Might you consider fixing this apparent ommssion? Thank you. Pendright (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- A Bot is supposed to do that but did not for some reason. I've done it manually. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
CSS styling in templates
Hello everyone, and sincere apologies if you're getting this message more than once. Just a heads-up that there is currently work on an extension in order to enable CSS styling in templates. Please check the document on mediawiki.org to discuss best storage methods and what we need to avoid with implementation. Thanks, m:User:Melamrawy (WMF), 09:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- The block log sometimes showed blocks as being much longer than they were. This has now been fixed. [20]
Changes this week
- Wikimedia pages will now be better at showing pictures when you share them on social media. The descriptions will be different too. You can see an example of before and after. [21]
- There are some changes to the OOjs UI. Some old functions will not work anymore or not work as they used to. This could be a breaking change. [22]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 February. It will be on all wikis from 9 February (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 7 February at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Tidy will be replaced later this year. Instead, the HTML 5 parsing algorithm will be used to clean up bad HTML in wikitext. This will cause problems on a number of wikis. They need to be fixed first. You can see if your wiki still has something to fix here for one of the HTML problems. This list does not cover all problems. You can read about more problems. [23][24]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of High Explosive Research
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article High Explosive Research you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of High Explosive Research
The article High Explosive Research you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:High Explosive Research for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for David Hawkins (philosopher)
On 9 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Hawkins (philosopher), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an interactive exhibit about the life and work of David Hawkins was called "Cultivate the Scientist in Every Child"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Hawkins (philosopher). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, David Hawkins (philosopher)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for John Clive Ward
On 13 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Clive Ward, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Clive Ward has been called "the father of the British H-bomb"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Clive Ward. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Clive Ward), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- EventStreams is a new way to show activity on Wikimedia wikis. For now it works with the recent changes feed. It will do more things later. It will replace RCStream. Tools that use RCStream should move to EventStreams before 7 July. [25]
Problems
- The Firefox add-on Firefogg can cause problems with the Upload Wizard. This will not be fixed, because Firefox will not support Firefogg in the future. The Upload Wizard will no longer work with Firefogg. [26]
- Tool Labs and Wikimedia Labs databases will be under maintenance on 15 February. This will start at 17:00 (UTC) and last for about six hours. Some tools could have problems during or after this. [27]
Changes this week
- The TwoColConflict extension is a new way to solve edit conflicts. It makes it easier to copy and paste the relevant text to the text field. It will come to Meta and German Wikipedia this week. It is already available on MediaWiki.org. It will come to more wikis later. [28]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 February. It will be on all wikis from 16 February (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 14 February at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Page Previews will be turned on for logged-out users on the Catalan, Greek, Russian, and Italian Wikipedias in the middle of February. Page Previews shows readers a short part of a linked article when they rest their mouse pointer on the link. This is to help them understand what it is about without leaving the article they are reading. Page Previews used to be called Hovercards. It will come to more wikis later this spring. [29]
- The Developer Wishlist is a list where developers prioritize tools they need. The voting closes at 14 February 23:59 (UTC). This process is only for developers.
Review
- You can read the 2016 product summary from the Wikimedia Foundation Product group to see what they did with things they said they would work on in the annual plan.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations!
The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds | ||
For your work in promoting Project Y, Dayton Project, and Ames Project, I am pleased to present you with the A-class Medal with Diamonds. For the Coordinators of the Military history Project. Parsecboy (talk) 01:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC) |
DYK for Jean Tatlock
On 16 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jean Tatlock, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jean Tatlock had a romantic relationship with Robert Oppenheimer, introducing him to poetry and politics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jean Tatlock. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jean Tatlock), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for High Explosive Research
On 16 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article High Explosive Research, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that whilst carrying out High Explosive Research, British scientists developed atomic weapons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/High Explosive Research. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, High Explosive Research), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Million award for Featured Article Richard Feynman
The Million Award | ||
For your contributions to bring Richard Feynman (estimated annual readership: 1,160,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC) |
Can you help me at FAC?
King Kalākaua's world tour has stalled after two supports and a couple of pretty hefty reviews. Can you add anything to the review? Either way, thanks. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The edit summary box is now a little bit bigger. This is to make it follow the Wikimedia design guide. [30]
Changes this week
- Page Previews will be updated on 23 February. This fixes many bugs. Page Previews can be turned on as the Beta Feature called Hovercards. [31]
- There has been a problem where the CSS of gadgets has been loading twice. The Gadgets extension has two new options:
type
andpeers
. Thetype
option solves this problem. You can usepeers
to create gadgets with more than one style module. Read more about type and peers. [32] - OAuth will handle blocked users in a more consistent way. [33]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 February. It will be on all wikis from 23 February (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 21 February at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Niels Bohr
Hi, the additional citation that I added in the article Niels Bohr about the invitation by Lord Cherwell was reversed by you. The reason given was that it's already covered by existing link. Can you please let me know that existing link, because I could not find it? Thanks for your information.--老陳 (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- The sentence was sourced to Thirsk (2006), p. 374. You are claiming that you checked that book and it did not cover the sentence? I don't have a copy on hand, so I'll have to take your word for it. I did check Powers, and the claim is supported on p. 237. Looking back through the change history, I have restored the original source, which is Jones (1985). p. 280. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply! Those 2 books do not have Google previews and Amazon look-insides. The source that I added has Google preview. It would do reader a service if that source can be included also.--老陳 (talk) 06:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Operation Hurricane
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Hurricane you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Operation Hurricane
The article Operation Hurricane you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Operation Hurricane for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Operation Hurricane
The article Operation Hurricane you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Hurricane for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Operation Hurricane
Hello! Your submission of Operation Hurricane at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Rob13Talk 05:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
GA on Hurricane
Congrats, Hawkeye. Well done. SkoreKeep (talk) 18:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Oh, and I suppose that column sort on Hurricane was somewhat superfluous. Thanks for that, too. SkoreKeep (talk) 23:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- On 22 February the wikipedia.org portal did not work for an hour. This was because of a problem with a JavaScript file. [34]
Changes this week
- You will be able to use
<chem>
to write chemical formulas in the visual editor. Previously this only worked in the wikitext editor. [35] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 March. It will be on all wikis from 2 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 28 February at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You can soon upload 3D files to Commons. The file formats are AMF and STL. The plan is for this to work later this week but it could be later. [36]
- The name "Wikipedia" will be more obvious at the top of the page when you read Wikipedia in the mobile view. This is because many readers don't realize they are on Wikipedia. [37][38]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
Closure of Lead FAC!
G'day Hawkeye7, I think my ping to you, here, may not have registered. Thank you. Sandbh (talk) 01:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Now that's Lead FAC is over, problems raised remain?
Hi, Hawkeye. I would want to clarify a few points regarding your comments on the FAC page so we can make sure we'll get it there the second time.
First, you have listed a number of paragraphs we needed to "find citations for." Most of those paragraphs had some---that noted---citations at that point. I assumed there could be particular claims that were sort of asking for a source to refer to, and I checked around a half of them (maybe more) and couldn't find it. I assumed then I wouldn't act unless you explain me what must be done. I suggested it then---and I am suggesting it now---that you list the claims needing citations or add {{cn}} tags. May I ask you to do so?
Then, to quote the subsequent WT:FAC talk, "I also wanted to see locations for the books, publishers for the web sites and - although I'm willing to yield on this point - ISSNs for the journals." I genuinely don't understand a few points here. First, locations? They could be helpful when there are multiple publishers sharing the same name and there's some bibliographical tradition to include them. On the opposite side, we have the amount of work needed to put those in and my personal feeling that this is superfluous information. This, surely enough, would matter nothing if I had to put them in---there was a requirement or something---but to my knowledge, there isn't. And unless there is (please tell me if this is the case), this is a "what I like and what I don't" thing that you surely could agree are not things to influence the process of a FAC. (You did not reply to my original response, and I assumed this review this one of those partial reviews that were not aimed at supporting but only raising some prerequisite points. I was unpleasantly surprised that you in fact were watching the progress but stayed away from replying and then this "unresolved" issue came up at the WT:FAC talk as if it was something we had to do but didn't.) So please clarify why this is a requirement to comply with (aside from "a reviewer wanted it," as I see nothing more at the moment).
Then, publishers for the web sites. I see you're probably referring to this comment: "FN 64, 164 publisher?" If that is the case, then I satisfied your call for no. 164. This leaves one. I specified that according to Template:Cite web, I should not have provided a publisher for no. 64 (though I have reviewed my stance on this one since, so we must be good on this now. Are we?).
And then, the ISSNs. Again, why is this a requirement aside from personal preferences? As for me, I am reluctant to spend time on this one unless I have to---I don't see the point: hardly anyone wouldn't be satisfied with a DOI and, in general, I don't want that to be TMI. One such code helps uniquely define an article.--R8R (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter at all that the paragraphs have some references. Nobody cares about that. Everything has to be cited. Every last thing. This is a sine qua non. And the refusal to do so is an immediate failure at FAC or GAC. We didn't proceed with the next step of verifying the claims cited against the sources.
- You're sort of missing the point. I have nothing to reply to this with but with what I've already written. Let me repeat myself, "I assumed there could be particular claims that were sort of asking for a source to refer to, and I checked around a half of them (maybe more) and couldn't find it. I assumed then I wouldn't act unless you explain me what must be done. I suggested it then---and I am suggesting it now---that you list the claims needing citations or add {{cn}} tags." Just saying generic "everything" does not help in a particular case.
- Added. But I provided a like of paragraphs with unreferenced claims. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Here's a quote from WP:FAC: "Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed [bold in the source]". That is what I am asking for. What claims do we need references for?--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you. That was what I was looking for.--R8R (talk) 13:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- You're sort of missing the point. I have nothing to reply to this with but with what I've already written. Let me repeat myself, "I assumed there could be particular claims that were sort of asking for a source to refer to, and I checked around a half of them (maybe more) and couldn't find it. I assumed then I wouldn't act unless you explain me what must be done. I suggested it then---and I am suggesting it now---that you list the claims needing citations or add {{cn}} tags." Just saying generic "everything" does not help in a particular case.
- The claim that according to Template:Cite web you don't have to provide a publisher for web sites is utterly wrong. It isn't what it says at all! All web site citations require a publisher. As with the above, it either gets fixed, or the article will not pass FAC.
- I was referring to this particular quote: "Do not use the publisher parameter for the name of a work (e.g. a book, encyclopedia, newspaper, magazine, journal, website)." Nevertheless, I did specify what you wanted here was done. Why are you still threatening with not passing FAC?--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm only reviewing. It's up to the delegate to pass it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- I was referring to this particular quote: "Do not use the publisher parameter for the name of a work (e.g. a book, encyclopedia, newspaper, magazine, journal, website)." Nevertheless, I did specify what you wanted here was done. Why are you still threatening with not passing FAC?--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- It is traditional to provide locations for books. It is the normal citation style. The reason is that when the book is looked up manually, the location is required. Nowadays, the ISBN can be used to look up a book, so it is redundant. It is still the style to provide it anyway.
- I don't see how "the style" is anything more than a personal liking. There is no particular style we have to follow here in Wikipedia as far as I know.--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but to look up a book you need either location-publisher-year or isbn. But not all books have isbns. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see how "the style" is anything more than a personal liking. There is no particular style we have to follow here in Wikipedia as far as I know.--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
- DOIs aren't much use really, but the ISSN is just a preference, like alt text, so I was willing to waive it. It is required by other language Wikipedias and is used when we translate the article.
- Okay, noted. Won't act now but will have in mind in future.--R8R (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
It is good we've framed the amount of work to be done clearly. Thank you.--R8R (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
March 2017 WikiCup newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:
- Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
- Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
- 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
- Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.
The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.
So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
Fair Use in Australia campaign update
- I'm writing you this followup message, as you took the time to vote in support of a Wikipedia banner campaign for the introduction of Fair Use in Australia.
- After much planning and coordination with the WMF, Australian Digital Alliance, and Electronic Frontiers Australia, as of Monday the banner-campaign is active on English Wikipedia to a portion of logged-out readers in Australia (technical details). The banners direct people to this page on Meta: FairCopyrightOz. That page, alongside lots of information, further directs people towards the campaign website faircopyright.org.au where Australians are invited to write to their local MP to express support of Fair Use. If you are interested in supporting this campaign, please, send a letter yourself using the template letter provided at that link.
- Furthermore, and with the support of the ADA & EFA, we have received fantastic media coverage - with article "Fair Use: Wikipedia targets Australians in bid to change the law" appearing on page 2 of the Sydney Morning Herald and page 10 of the Melbourne Age on Monday's edition. It was for a time the 3rd most read article the Fairfax website, and Fair Use was "trending" on Twitter in Australia. We are running the account @FairCopyrightOz on twitter, and we are tracking other press-mentions on the talkpage on Meta.
- Today, day 2, we published a detailed post about the campaign on the Wikimedia Blog, ran an "Ask Me Anything" Q&A session on the Australia page in Reddit, and [by happy coincidence of timing] the article History of fair use proposals in Australia appeared on the en.wp mainpage as a Did You Know. [The creation of that "history of..." article was a specific request arising from in the community consultation in which you voted].
- And, most importantly, in a little more than a day nearly 800 letters to MPs have been sent encouraging them to support the Productivity Commission's recommendation to adopt Fair Use in Australia. I urge you - please add your own message.
- Sincerely, Wittylama 16:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Leon W. Johnson
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leon W. Johnson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
John Glenn article
John Glenn's article has passed GA; do you think it is ready for an A-class review, or does it need significant changes beforehand? Kees08 (talk) 21:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now search on English, French, Hebrew and Greek wikis and find words even if you forget the diacritics. It also works if you use diacritics in your search but the wiki doesn't. [39]
- When you use the mobile view and click on a link to an article in another language you will see that article in the mobile view. Previously it changed to the desktop view. [40]
Problems
- Some watchlist gadgets didn't work for a period of time last week. This has now been fixed. [41]
- Admins who click on "mass delete" on a user's Special:Contributions will be taken directly to a list pages created by that user. It has worked like this before, but not lately. [42]
Changes this week
- The way you switch between wikitext and the visual editors in the desktop view has changed. It is now a drop-down menu. This is the same as in the mobile view. [43]
- The "flag the edit in the abuse log" checkbox will be removed from the abuse filter interface. This is because the edits are always flagged in the abuse log. [44]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 March. It will be on all wikis from 9 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 7 March at 20:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Clarification
- The 2017/09 issue of Tech News mentioned 3D file formats you can soon upload to Commons. The AMF format will be available later.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Project E you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Years of birth and death of N. Bohr's wife/widow
You undid (Niels Bohr 769071112) an edit by me where I added years for the wife/widow. What style would be more appropriate for this information? An individual who is not notable enough to have her own article? Should it be in the infobox at the beginning of the article? /JeppeSN (talk) 13:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
S-1 Executive Committee and the Manhattan project
There was no confusion with the Manhattan District. Mark Oliphant flew to the USA in August 1941. The US project was called The S-1 Executive Committee. This mission caused the S-1 Committee to take seriously the concept of a practical atomic bomb in December 1941. James Marshall chose 240 Broadway in Manhattan in June 1942 to be close to one of the main contractors. The names 'Manhattan District' or 'Manhattan Project' did not exist until then. Ref Pulitzer Prize Winning The Making of the Atomic Bomb by Richard Rhodes. It is impossible that a project that did not yet exist could be expanded. This logic is irrefutable. Please restore my edit. JMcC (talk) 09:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC).
- That's right. The Manhattan Project was codenamed S-1. The Army formed the Manhattan District in August 1942, named, as you note, after where it was located (as did all the engineer districts). The project continued to be codenamed S-1, but gradually the name "Manhattan Project" came to be applied to it, but even in 1945 you can still see documents referring to "S-1". The Manhattan Project came to an end on 31 December 1946, and its functions were assumed by the Atomic Energy Commission and the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project. The Manhattan District continued until 15 August 1947, when it was inactivated. The director of the Manhattan Project was Leslie Groves; the commander of the Manhattan District was Kenneth Nichols. The article is very carefully written to not confuse the Manhattan Project with the Manhattan District. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:51, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Project E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Streak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
FAC William Pūnohu White
Hello, I don't know if you came across Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William Pūnohu White/archive1. It was closed today because of no traffic and only 1 review after a month. The quality of the article is FAC material in my opinion. I did not ask anybody (except two users) in the initial run to review it since I was trusting that it will receive reviews. Now I am asking a couple of people here and there to see if there is enough interest to renominate it again as recommended by the closing admin. I will only go ahead and renominate it once I find a few people who wants to give it a review. Please let me know if you are interested. Thanks either way.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:37, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- I know what it's like. Australia women's national wheelchair basketball team at the 2012 Summer Paralympics was closed for lack of reviews twice. I'll give it a review next time it comes up, although it's outside my area of expertise. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. Here is the second nomination Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William Pūnohu White/archive2. Look at it when you can. Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have a fiat from the co-ordinator? You usually cannot re-nominate for two weeks after closure. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the closing admin Sarastro1 said "I've no problem if you want to renominate at once" on their talk page.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Do you have a fiat from the co-ordinator? You usually cannot re-nominate for two weeks after closure. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:33, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. Here is the second nomination Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William Pūnohu White/archive2. Look at it when you can. Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
The article Project E you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Project E for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Leon W. Johnson
The article Leon W. Johnson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leon W. Johnson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
FACbot
Out of mild curiosity, is there any reason why the bot did not today run on the recently promoted/archived FAC pages? I only ask because I usually get pinged when it runs, and I just realised that I wasn't pinged! Sarastro1 (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- I get pinged when the Bot has a problem. The 11 March 2017 run did not complete. It may have encountered one of those database down events. I ran a debugging run today. This is a run where I set a flag and it chatters to me as it performs its work. No problem was encountered, and it promoted several articles. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
- You will be able to show references from
<references />
tags in more than one column on your wiki. This is the list of footnotes for the sources in the article. How many columns you see will depend on how big your screen is. On some wikis, some templates already do this. Templates that use<references />
tags will need to be updated, and then later the change can happen for all reference lists. [45][46] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 March. It will be on all wikis from 16 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 14 March at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Some old web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis in the future. If you have an old web browser on your computer you can upgrade to a newer version. [47]
- CSS in templates will be stored in a separate page in the future. [48][49]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Operation Hurricane
On 14 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Operation Hurricane, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in Operation Hurricane, an atomic bomb was exploded in the hull of HMS Plym? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Hurricane. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Operation Hurricane), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Project E
On 16 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project E, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the United States gave nuclear weapons to Britain as part of Project E? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project E. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Project E), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- President Truman's relief of General Douglas MacArthur
- added a link pointing to Charles Ross
- Robert Lyste Thornton
- added a link pointing to Berkeley
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
FACBot
Hi Hawkeye. FACBot added a second maindate parameter for Rosetta Stone when the article ran on TFA a second time today. This broke the article history template. Would it be possible for the bot to avoid adding a maindate parameter when the template already has one, or has a maindate2 parameter? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. I don't think the possibility occurred to me. I'll let the FACBot know what to do. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Half Barnstar | ||
Great work on the Truman/MacArthur piece. I realize my prose could be rather severe, but I think its' in much better shape largely thanks to you. Tip o' the hat--216.12.10.118 (talk) 21:08, 18 March 2017 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The
Save page
button now saysPublish page
orPublish changes
on the Wikimedia wikis except for Wikipedias and Wikinewses. This change will come to Wikipedias later. The point is to make it more clear that the edit will change the page immediately.Publish page
is when you save a new page andPublish changes
when you edit an existing page. [50] - DMOZ no longer works. Templates that use DMOZ can be redirected to archive.org or another mirror. DMOZ has been removed from the RelatedSites extension on Wikivoyage. [51]
- You can see monthly page views when you click on
Page information
in the sidebar. Developers can also get monthly page views through the API. [52] - The Linter extension is now on smaller Wikimedia wikis. It helps editors find some wikitext errors so they can be fixed. It will come to other Wikimedia wikis later. The extension will be able to find more errors later. [53]
- The MediaWiki-Vagrant portable development environment has been updated to use Debian Jessie. This means local development and testing will be more like on the majority of Wikimedia production servers. [54]
Problems
- On 15 March some interwiki links to other languages were not correctly sorted. This has been fixed. If you still see pages where the interwiki links are not sorted as they should be, they should be fixed automatically with time or you can edit the page and save it without changing anything. If this doesn't work, please report it. [55]
Changes this week
- When you edit with the visual editor, you will be able to switch the direction you write in from right-to-left to left-to-right as you are editing. This is especially important for editors who edit in languages that write from right to left. You can do this with a tool in the editing menu. You can also use the keyboard shortcut
Ctrl
+Shift
+X
on PCs orCmd
+Shift
+X
on Macs. [56] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 21 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 22 March. It will be on all wikis from 23 March (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 21 March at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Hawkeye7. I added the refs that you requested. Would you kindly revisit the DYK nom? Happy editing! -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert F. Travis
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert F. Travis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert F. Travis
The article Robert F. Travis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert F. Travis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash
Hello! Your submission of 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Robert Lyste Thornton
On 24 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert Lyste Thornton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Robert Lyste Thornton returned to Berkeley in 1942 to assist with the development of the calutron? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Lyste Thornton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert Lyste Thornton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Hurricane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AWST. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Another FACbot query
Just noticed in passing that this was never closed by FACbot. Not sure if it was something that I did, or just a glitch, but I thought I'd mention it as the article was renominated so there are technically two nominations open at once which might cause a meltdown somewhere. Sarastro1 (talk) 15:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- The nomination was closed and then reopened on the same day, before the FACBot could deal with it. I have closed it by hand. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
John Glenn A-class
@Hawkeye7: Hey there. Would you have time to give me guidance or perhaps even conominate the John Glenn article with me? There are some answers that seem basic that I do not know (like should NASA's website be cited as website=NASA, and therefore italicized). Let me know, I would appreciate it if you did. Thanks either way! Kees08 (talk) 21:06, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Alright. I'll have to do a pass through it and adjust the references. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- That would be great. If you just let me know which path is the right path forward to take, I can take a stab at fixing the refs more too. Kees08 (talk) 04:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- I've done one pass through it. I'll do another tomorrow. In answer to your question: NASA is a publisher, not a website. The main problem, though, is inconsistency, with "publisher", "website", "work" and a couple of other being used for the same thing. Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- That would be great. If you just let me know which path is the right path forward to take, I can take a stab at fixing the refs more too. Kees08 (talk) 04:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- When you edit with the visual editor, you can see a visual diff as well as a wikitext diff when you review your changes. [57]
Problems
- Special:AllPages was disabled for two days due to some performance issues. It is back, but the filter for redirects is gone as the cause of the performance problem. It still needs to be fixed. [58][59]
Changes this week
- New filters for Recent changes will be released on Portuguese and Polish Wikipedias and MediaWikiwiki on March 28. Other wikis will get it progressively. The new filters include filtering, highlighting and, on certain wikis, user intent prediction.
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from March 28. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from March 29. It will be on all wikis from March 30 (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
14:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton
On 28 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton used liquid methane experimentally to power a bus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alfred Charles Glyn Egerton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
St Vincent-class battleship ACR
I've responded to your comments at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/St Vincent-class battleship a while ago, but I suspect that you've forgotten about them.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash
On 2 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 19 people, including Brigadier General Robert F. Travis, were killed when a Boeing B29 crashed with a Mark 4 nuclear bomb on board? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1950 Fairfield-Suisun Boeing B-29 crash), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Robert F. Travis
On 2 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Robert F. Travis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 19 people, including Brigadier General Robert F. Travis, were killed when a Boeing B29 crashed with a Mark 4 nuclear bomb on board? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Robert F. Travis), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Manhattan
G'day mate. I'm watching Manhattan (TV series) and thought of you. don't know if you've seen it? All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I watched it. Almost of the characters are fictional (with odd takes on Niels Bohr, Robert Oppenheimer, Jean Tatlock and Kitty Oppenheimer), but the sets and costumes are very authentic, and the issues are quite real. In their misfit status the team in the series does resemble Seth Neddermeyer's implosion group, but it even more closely resembles Edward Teller's Super group. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:42, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- I'm quite enjoying it. It's entertaining but doesn't need so much attention that I can't dip in and out. I've been cross-referencing details with your articles! They do a good job of showing the strains of living under that sort of secrecy and the toll it took on family life. They also seem to be having a lot of sex (well, what else is there to do in the desert in the middle of a war!) and I'm not sure if that's a vital plot point or just a Game of Thrones-style cutaway to keep the viewer interested! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Edward Elliott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lord Kitchener, Athletics and Battle of Amiens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The
Save page
button now saysPublish page
orPublish changes
on most Wikipedias. The point is to make it more clear that the edit will change the page immediately.Publish page
is when you save a new page andPublish changes
when you edit an existing page. [60] - The tracking category Category:Pages with template loops is now added when a template loop is found. A template loop is for example when a template tries to use a second template that uses the first template. [61]
- English Wikipedia now has cookie blocks. It will come to more wikis in the future. This is an extension to the autoblock system so when a user is blocked, the next time they visit the wiki a cookie will be set. This means that even if the user switches accounts and to a new IP address the cookie will block them again. [62]
Problems
- Wikidata descriptions, aliases and labels that used some characters could not be saved. This has now been fixed. [63]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 4 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 5 April. It will be on all wikis from 6 April (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 4 April at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the next office hour with the Wikidata team. The meeting will be on 5 April at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- New filters for Recent changes will come to Wikidata and Persian, Dutch, Russian, Turkish, Czech and Hebrew Wikipedia on 11 April. The new filters include filtering, highlighting and user intent prediction. User intent prediction means the filter tries to help editors determine if the edit was made in good faith or not. Other wikis will get it later. [64]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
WIR-YOS
[65]? Diff please to previous warning, as I've no idea what you're talking about. According to this, we've never even intersected on an article talk page and the only diff of yours on my talk page is unrelated. The article is listed at WP:WIRYOS, in the list of improved/created articles. I added the template created to add to those articles. In this case it appears to have been added because an image was restored and added to the article as part of the event. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- The article was created in June 2003, and I improved it to GA status in June 2015. I complained to Rosiestep about the attribution of articles that I have worked on in Esino Lario in 2016. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps you mistook my username for Rosie's (re: warning), or assume that we talked about your [presumably offline] conversation in Esino Lario? Regardless, the template says "This article was created or improved as part of...", similar to all the other WiR tags, education program assignments, edit-a-thons like Art+Feminism, etc. The bar is low to add such banners, and I don't think anybody reads them as necessarily meaning "the lion's share of work done to this article was done via this event" (and, of course, the vast majority of non-Wikipedians never see it).
- If you would like there to be a higher bar to add it, or perhaps template parameters which allow whoever adds it to specify the sort of work done (e.g. "One or more images were added to this article as part of..."), that's a very sensible discussion to have, and I'd probably support some version of it. "Credit" on Wikipedia is obviously fraught and all kinds of sensitive (as an aside, I keep meaning to write an essay born of frustration with people creating articles when a draft with the same name of similar quality already exists), but I don't think it makes sense to use it on the talk page of every article edited as part of an event ... unless a major contributor to the page thinks it takes away from their own contribution. Granted, it's probably a gray area, since I don't know that there's ever been any linkable form of consensus that these should be added everywhere. Thoughts? (to be clear, I'm not so much arguing this particular article -- and don't intend to restore it there -- as much as general principle). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
- Each project is free to tag whatever articles it chooses as part of its project, so go ahead if you want to. And yes, it has been taken as meaning "the lion's share of work done to this article was done via this event" in the mainstream media. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations!
The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds | ||
For your work on Alan Shepard, High Explosive Research, and S-50 (Manhattan Project), promoted between February and April 2017. For the coordinators, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:15, 4 April 2017 (UTC) |
Milhistbot
G'day Hawkeye, I think Milhistbot didn't pick up that Kragujevac massacre was a joint nom at ACR. It seems to have credited 23 editor but not me. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Finschhafen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Finschhafen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 10:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Gellibrand
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Gellibrand you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Gellibrand
The article John Gellibrand you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Gellibrand for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Jan to Mar 17 Milhist article reviewing
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of five Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period January to March 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Great work!
In memory of Pompey | |
As an appreciation of your work on this article, I found and uploaded this image of Pompey! Kerry (talk) 08:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of John Gellibrand
The article John Gellibrand you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Gellibrand for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Edward Elliott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heliopolis, British Expeditionary Force and Battle of Amiens. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harold Edward Elliott
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harold Edward Elliott you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Tidy is going to be replaced with an HTML5 parsing algorithm. Bad HTML in wikitext would cause problems on a number of wikis. There is now a ParserMigration extension on all wikis that you can use to help clean this up. You can read more about how you can use it. [66]
Changes this week
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis from this week. If you have an old web browser on your computer you can upgrade to a newer version. [67]
- New filters for Recent changes will come to Wikidata and Persian, Russian, Turkish and French Wikipedia on 11 April. The schedule has been changed to fix the user intent prediction filters for some wikis. User intent prediction means the filter tries to make it easier for editors to determine if the edit was made in good faith or not. Other wikis will get it later. [68]
- The list of special characters in the wikitext editor and the visual editor will now have a group of Canadian Aboriginal characters. [69]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 April. It will be on all wikis from 13 April (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 11 April at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for 20 to 30 minutes on 19 April and 3 May. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. You can read more about this.
- RevisionSlider will change how you move between revisions. This will be available on the test wiki from 11 April. It will come to other wikis later if users like the change. You can test it and give feedback.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Finschhafen
The article Battle of Finschhafen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Finschhafen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 03:01, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harold Edward Elliott
The article Harold Edward Elliott you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Harold Edward Elliott for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harold Edward Elliott
The article Harold Edward Elliott you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harold Edward Elliott for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Battle of Madang
G'day Hawkeye7, as we look to wrap up the Huon Peninsula articles, is there anything that you would like to add about that campaign to the Battle of Madang? AustralianRupert (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- I don't have my books at the moment, so I can't do anything myself until I return in May. The Madang article is a little incoherernt in parts "which had been secured by US and Australian forces in January – February 1944 by troops assigned to the Huon Peninsula campaign". Furthermore:
- The main problem here is that the key point - that Madang was secured by forces moving along the coast in boats of the 532nd EBSR is obscured
- The Japanese were not withdrawing from Saidor, but from the Finschhafen area past Saidor
- Where were the Japanese withdrawing to? From memory, it was the Sepik
- The article should state when Madang was occupied, as this was far from obvious too
Regards Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- G'day, Hawkeye, thanks for these points. I have tried to adjust the article to deal with these points now. Thank you for your time. Regards, 08:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
- G'day again, Hawkeye, as I am now on Christmas leave, I am looking to do a bit more content work. I was thinking of putting this one up for GA. Would you mind taking a look to see if there is anything else you feel should be covered? Thanks for your time. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 02:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of John Gellibrand
Hello! Your submission of John Gellibrand at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HaEr48 (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can add
?safemode=1
to the end of the URL on Wikimedia wikis to disable your personal CSS and JavaScript. Example:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature?safemode=1
. This means you can test if a problem is because of your user scripts or gadgets without uninstalling them. [70] - You can now see a list of all autoblocks on Special:AutoblockList. [71]
- The Wikiversity and Wikinews logos are now shown directly from the configuration and not from
[[File:Wiki.png]]
. If you want to change logo or have an anniversary logo, see how to request a configuration change. This is how it already works for other projects. They can request logo changes the same way. [72]
Problems
- Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for 20 to 30 minutes on 19 April. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. You can read more about this. This will also happen on 3 May.
Changes this week
- There is no new Mediawiki version this week. This is because of the data centre test.
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 18 April at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- stats.wikimedia.org will be replaced. You can see the new prototype. You can leave feedback on this change.
- Page Previews will be turned on for logged-out users on a large number of wikis in May. It could be postponed and happen later. Page Previews shows readers a short part of a linked article when they rest their mouse pointer on the link. This is to help them understand what it is about without leaving the article they are reading. Page Previews used to be called Hovercards. Users who have tested the feature can give feedback. [73]
- From next week, user scripts using very old deprecated wikibits functions will show errors. These functions have not worked since 2013. You should fix or disable broken scripts. You can see examples of how to upgrade scripts. [74][75]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
X-10 Graphite Reactor
I was at a bit of a loss where to put this in the FA list; I went for history, but if you want it moving somewhere else, let me know. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | ||
For your excellent review of INS Vikrant (R11) at A-class review, which is now a featured article. Thanks for helping me towards my first FA. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- New filters for recent changes are now available as a beta feature on most wikis. You can turn it on in your preferences. Remaining wikis will have the new filters on 9 May. [76]
- When administrators, bureaucrats and stewards make a user a member of a user group they can now set an expiry date. A user group is for example "administrators" or "bots". This means that they can give someone user rights for a limited time. This is similar to how blocks and page protections can be limited in time. Special:UserRights will have new options for this. You can read more about user groups. [77]
Problems
- Since the data centre test last week the content translation tool has been disabled. This is because of a database problem. It will be back as soon as the problem has been solved. [78]
Changes this week
- The GuidedTour extension will be enabled on all wikis. This is a tool to explain to new users how to edit. [79]
- Wiktionary will handle interlanguage links in a new way. The Cognate extension will automatically link pages with the same title between Wiktionaries. For this to work all old interlanguage links have to be removed. You can read more about this. [80]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 April. It will be on all wikis from 27 April (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 25 April at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK for John Gellibrand
On 26 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Gellibrand, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite topping his class at Sandhurst, John Gellibrand found the prospects for promotion in the British Army so bleak that he resigned his commission and moved to Tasmania to grow apples? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Gellibrand. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Gellibrand), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Harold Edward Elliott
Hello! Your submission of Harold Edward Elliott at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 21:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
And another FACbot query
For some reason, the bot never ran on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Philippine Competition Commission/archive1, which was archived a few days ago. Thanks, Sarastro1 (talk) 21:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- I'm away at the moment, so it will take a few days. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward J. Drea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
May 2017 WikiCup newsletter
The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:
- Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
- 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
- Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
- Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.
Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.
So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The content translation tool works again. It was turned off because of a database problem. [81]
- Scripts using very old deprecated wikibits functions show errors. These functions have not worked since 2013. You should fix or disable broken scripts. You can see examples of how to upgrade scripts. This is the same thing as Tech News wrote about in issue 2017/16. You need to add
mw.loader.using( 'mediawiki.util' )
block for your scripts also, or addmediawiki.util
dependency in gadget ResourceLoader section in MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition. [82][83]
Problems
- Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for 20 to 30 minutes on 3 May. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. You can read more about this.
Changes this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week. This is because of the data centre test.
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 2 May at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- All Wikimedia wikis will have cookie blocks from May 8. This is an extension to the autoblock system so when a user is blocked, the next time they visit the wiki a cookie will be set. This means that even if the user switches accounts and to a new IP address the cookie will block them again. [84]
- The
Publish changes
,Show preview
andShow changes
buttons will look slightly different. This is to fit with the OOUI look. Users can test scripts, gadgets and so on to see if they work with the new interface by adding&ooui=1
to the URL. [85]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Archived FAC
Hi -- just doing some stats analysis on April FACs, and I found this, which doesn't seem to have been processed. Looks like the FAC is not linked on the article talk page -- is that why? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- The problem is that it was removed from the FAC category with this edit. I restored it to the category, and the Bot has processed it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- This is also unprocessed, though the FAC is linked on the talk page. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 02:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- I will investigate. I can't tell what is going on without checking the logs, and I can't do that until I return home. (I may get the Bot to put them in the drop box in future so I can read them remotely.) The Bot sends me error reports with logs when it has a problem, but it has not detected one. I will have to get back to you in a few days. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Now that I can see the log, the Bot says: "WARNING: FAC closed but Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Philippine Competition Commission/archive1 has NOT been moved to the archive page". This is true; I have made this change, and it was processed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- OK; if I see more untranscludede archives I'll look for those issues before checking with you. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:53, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Now that I can see the log, the Bot says: "WARNING: FAC closed but Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Philippine Competition Commission/archive1 has NOT been moved to the archive page". This is true; I have made this change, and it was processed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- I will investigate. I can't tell what is going on without checking the logs, and I can't do that until I return home. (I may get the Bot to put them in the drop box in future so I can read them remotely.) The Bot sends me error reports with logs when it has a problem, but it has not detected one. I will have to get back to you in a few days. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Bismuth phosphate process
On 3 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bismuth phosphate process, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the bismuth phosphate process was used by the Manhattan Project to extract plutonium for use in atomic bombs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bismuth phosphate process. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bismuth phosphate process), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Harold Edward Elliott
On 4 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harold Edward Elliott, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brigadier General Pompey Elliott convinced his men that his horse could spot men who were unshaven or incorrectly dressed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Harold Edward Elliott. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Harold Edward Elliott), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 05:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Barnstar
The World War Barnstar | ||
Harold Edward Elliott. Three cheers! Nicely done! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Some users have a problem with the watchlist. Some changes in categories make the watchlist a blank page. The developers are working on this. Until this is fixed you can try some things that have helped other editors if you have this problem. You can turn on
Hide categorization of pages
in your watchlist preferences. You can turn offExpand watchlist to show all changes, not just the most recent
in your watchlist preferences. You can remove problematic categories from Special:EditWatchlist/raw. [86] - There was a problem with the visual editor for several days. You could not save edits that triggered a CAPTCHA. This would for example be when a new user added external links in references. This was fixed on 2 May. [87]
Changes this week
- When you edit you can switch between the visual editor and the wikitext editor. This works if the wiki you edit has the visual editor. The menu will now say
Visual editing
andSource editing
instead ofSwitch to visual editing
andSwitch to code editing
. This is because it was confusing when the menu said you could switch to the editor you were already using. [88] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 9 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 10 May. It will be on all wikis from 11 May (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 9 May at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You will be able to get a notification when a page you created is connected to a Wikidata item. This will come to Wikivoyage on 9 May. If there are no problems it will come to most Wikipedias on 30 May. It will come to other projects and English, French and German Wikipedia later in the summer. It will be opt-in for existing users and opt-out for new users. [89][90]
- Markup that looks like code for language variants might need to be fixed. If
-{
is used in transclusions or web addresses it has to be escaped appropriately. You can use-<nowiki/>{
for transclusions and%2D{
in web addresses. A transclusion could for example be when you use-{
in a template:{{1x| sad :-{ face }}
. This is because of some code fixes to the preprocessor and affects all wikis. [91][92]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Edit summary
Can you please explain this edit summary: [93]. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now use ISBNs to automatically generate citations in the visual editor. This works on wikis that have enabled Citoid. [94]
- The Two Column Edit Conflict View is available as a beta feature on all wikis. It is a new interface for the edit conflict resolution page. [95]
Problems
- The
mediawiki.util
library does not load automatically any more. Your Special:MyPage/common.js may use it. If you have technical problems that started a couple of weeks ago you can try addingmw.loader.using( 'mediawiki.util' ).done(function(){
as the first line in the file and});
as a last one. Tech News wrote about this in the 2017/18 issue. [96]
Changes this week
- The RevisionSlider extension will be a default feature on all wikis. RevisionSlider is an easier way to move between changes in the page history. It has been a default feature on German, Arabic and Hebrew Wikipedia and a beta feature on all wikis. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences. [97]
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Future changes
- Administrators will soon be able to search through deleted pages. [98][99]
- Markup that looks like code for language variants might need to be fixed. Tech News wrote about this last week. If
-{
is used in transclusions or web addresses it has to be escaped appropriately. You can use-<nowiki/>{
for transclusions and%2D{
in web addresses. This is because of some code fixes to the preprocessor and affects all wikis. You can now see the full list of wikis with this problem and help fix them to avoid that things break later this month. You might find false positives. You can read more about what to fix. [100][101]
Older unreported changes
- Your Meta user page is shown on all wikis where you don't have a local user page. You can now add the magic word
__NOGLOBAL__
to your Meta user page to stop this. [102][103]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Landing at Saidor
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Landing at Saidor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Landing at Saidor
The article Landing at Saidor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Landing at Saidor for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 May. It will be on all wikis from 25 May (calendar).
- There will be a
<div>
tag around HTML from the MediaWiki wikitext parser. Gadgets with code that does not follow recommendations could have problems with this. You can report new problems you think are related to this. [104]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for your follow up question on my RFA. It made me look at the situation in a different light and think about aspects of it I missed the first time. There might still be layers there that I'm missing.~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 12:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- You still have my support vote. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
FAC bot
Have you considered expanding the capability of FAC bot to include GAN? From what has been discussed on the talk page, the current GA bot is not really maintained and the owner does not want to, and your bot already interfaces with GAs already. Just a thought. Cheers. Kees08 (Talk) 01:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- It wasn't contemplated, because there was already a Bot that does GA work. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Last week’s MediaWiki version was rolled back from some wikis because of a problem. This means planned changes did not happen. [105]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 30 May at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You will be able to control who can notify you on the Wikimedia wikis. You will have a user blacklist. When you add a user to the blacklist you will not get a notification when they mention you. You can test this on Beta Wikipedia. You can read more and give feedback on Meta. [106]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Op-Ed?
I was looking through the World War I timeline page for inspiration for this month's Bugle op-ed piece and found the Battle of Messines (1917) and the introduction of the Gotha G.IV to be interesting enough for an op-ed; however, the more I read about the Battle of Messines the more I encountered Australian units. I recall that earlier you had written a particularly fine piece concerning the Australians on the Somme, so I thought I would drop you a line and see if you wanted to take this month's op-ed and discuss the Australians at the Battle of Messines. If not, then I will take up the Gotha G. IV and run with it for our June op-ed. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:05, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. I'll write one on Messines for you. Hawkeye7 (talk) 12:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Don't forget that there are still two book reviews at User:Hawkeye7/Book Reviews. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) Oops I'd missed them - posted, and thanks again. It's good to see the papers from the Kokoda conference published - I attended it, and the standard was very high. Nick-D (talk) 02:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Okay, you can find the Op-Ed at User:Hawkeye7/Sandbox5. Suggest moving it to the required location without redirect. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Hawkeye, many thanks for the op-ed and book reviews. In the latter, on the Kokoda book, was wondering if it might be worth clarifying just how "The consensus of historians has swung behind Generals Douglas MacArthur and Thomas Blamey" -- I have to admit some ignorance on this point and our readers might be in the same boat... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Don't forget that there are still two book reviews at User:Hawkeye7/Book Reviews. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of British hydrogen bomb programme
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article British hydrogen bomb programme you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can see new files on Special:NewFiles. You can now pick which dates you want to see files from. [107]
- When you read Wikipedia on a mobile device the first paragraph now comes before the infobox. [108]
- You can now remove navigation elements from your results when you search. This could for example be part of an infobox that is only there to help you find the previous or next article. [109]
- New users on Wikivoyages and Wikipedias (except French, English and German) now get a notification when a page they created is connected to Wikidata. Other wikis will get it 13 June. [110]
Problems
- The MediaWiki version from two weeks ago was rolled back. It was fixed late last week. Changes that were planned to go out last week did not happen. [111]
Changes this week
- Wikimedia wikis can show fewer links to articles in other languages. This is to make it easier to find the languages likely to be useful to the reader or editor. Everyone can still click to see the full list. Logged-in users who use the compact language links will see languages they have in their Babel box on their user page in the first, shorter list. You can turn the compact language list off or on in your preferences. [112]
- You can choose what dates to look at when you look at a user's contributions. [113]
- When you click on your watchlist in the mobile view you get a list of all pages in the watchlist instead of the latest changes to them. Logged-in users with at least ten edits will now get the latest changes instead. [114]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 June. It will be on all wikis from 8 June (calendar).
- String comparisons in Scribunto modules are now always done case-insensitively by byte order. Before they were sometimes in a case-sensitive US-English collation order. This could break some modules. [115]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 6 June at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The 2006 wikitext editor will be removed the week of 27 June. This is the old toolbar with small square blue buttons. You can see a picture of it. 0.03% of active Wikimedia editors use this old tool. They will not see a toolbar at all. [116][117]
- Wikimedia wikis use OCG to create PDFs. The OCG code has a lot of problems and will stop working. It has to be replaced. An alternative is Electron. You can tell the developers what you need the PDF service to be able to do. Electron already works on German Wikipedia. It will be on English Wikipedia later this week so you can test it there too. [118]
- The Architecture Committee will change and get a new name. You can read and comment on the draft that describes the new committee.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of British hydrogen bomb programme
The article British hydrogen bomb programme you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:British hydrogen bomb programme for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:21, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
- From the editors: Signpost status: On reserve power, help wanted!
- News and notes: Global Elections
- Arbitration report: Cases closed in the Pacific and with Magioladitis
- Featured content: Three months in the land of the featured
- In the media: Did Wikipedia just assume Garfield's gender?
- Recent research: Wikipedia bot wars capture the imagination of the popular press
- Technology report: Tech news catch-up
- Traffic report: Film on Top: Sampling the weekly top 10
Thank you for your copyediting help at The Plot to Hack America !
Thank you for your copyediting help at The Plot to Hack America ! Sagecandor (talk) 23:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Strategy
As you were at the Melbourne meetup - and have probably fed back into the system in more than one way or other regarding the strategy - is there anything you would like to add in any way to the Australian conversation in reletion to the Cycle 2 stage - either on wiki or off? I do think your contribution is important due to your profile amongst the milhist community, and the foot in either community would be an interesting perspective - I am trying up my report in the next day or so - so I am not asking for an essay - any words in relation to what Katherine was talking about - or anything that you think is important relative to strategy, I would be interested to hear about - thanks JarrahTree 01:38, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Some wikis have the larger and brighter OOjs UI edit page buttons. When you write an edit summary there you can now see how many bytes you have left before the summary is too long. [119]
- When you search on Wikipedia you can now find pages on other Wikimedia projects that could be relevant. You see them next to the search results. [120]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 13 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 14 June. It will be on all wikis from 15 June (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 13 June at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You will soon be able to get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account. You can test this on the test wiki. This will only work if they fail to log in to your account. [121]
- Wikimedia wikis use OCG to create PDFs. The OCG code has a lot of problems and will stop working. It has to be replaced. An alternative is Electron. You can tell the developers what you need the PDF service to be able to do. Electron now works on all Wikimedia projects. [122]
- Administrators can soon search for deleted page titles and find results that are similar to what they searched for. Today the search only finds pages that are exactly the same as what you search for. This is to make it easier to find pages when you don't know the exact title. Administrators on Arabic, Catalan, English, Persian, German, Italian, Polish, and Russian Wikipedia and on mediawiki.org can test this by adding
&fuzzy=1
to the end of the web address when looking at Special:Undelete. [123][124]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi Hawkeye, how's it going? Isidor Isaac Rabi has been scheduled for the above date as Today's Featured Article. I'd appreciate it if you could check the article one more time to make sure it's up-to-date. You can edit the text that will appear on the Main Page if you like; I'll be trimming it to around 1100 characters. Thanks! - Dank (push to talk) 00:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
- I've trimmed it down to the usual character count. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Leslie H. Martin
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leslie H. Martin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Leslie H. Martin
The article Leslie H. Martin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Leslie H. Martin for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Leslie H. Martin
The article Leslie H. Martin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leslie H. Martin for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
Changes this week
irc.wikimedia.org
has to be rebooted. This will probably happen on 21 June. It may be postponed. Some tools use this to get the recent changes feed. They will not work when it is down. [126]-
Special:PageData
will be an entry point for machine-readable page data. [127] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 20 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 21 June. It will be on all wikis from 22 June (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 20 June at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- CSS in templates will be stored in a separate page in the future. You can now see how the TemplateStyles extension works on Beta Labs.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK for British hydrogen bomb programme
On 20 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article British hydrogen bomb programme, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first tests of the British hydrogen bomb programme were hailed as a triumph but in fact were failures? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, British hydrogen bomb programme), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle (talk)) 05:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
- News and notes: Departments reorganized at Wikimedia Foundation, and a month without new RfAs (so far)
- In the media: Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
- Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take
- Featured content: Will there ever be a break? The slew of featured content continues
- Traffic report: Wonder Woman beats Batman, The Mummy, Darth Vader and the Earth
- Technology report: Improved search, and WMF data scientist tells all
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The <inputbox> has a new
searchfilter
parameter. You can add values likesearchfilter=insource:foo
. It will add that to the user's search query. [128]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 27 June. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 28 June. It will be on all wikis from 29 June (calendar).
- Users will be able to choose whether they want to see Wikidata changes in enhanced watchlist/recent changes. Previously, this was disabled for everyone. [129]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 27 June at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the next WMF Language team office hour, an open session to talk about Wikimedia Language projects. The meeting will be on 27 June at 13:00 UTC. [130]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Alfred Starbird
On 27 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alfred Starbird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alfred Starbird directed the Operation Dominic nuclear tests which "significantly enhanced the security of the nation and the free world"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alfred Starbird. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alfred Starbird), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Main Page Barnstar | ||
Fantastic work at Alfred Starbird! One of the best non-GA articles I've seen on DYK in a long time. You should consider nominating this some day! Happy editing, ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 02:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC) |
WikiCup 2017 July newsletter
The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.
Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.
As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There was a problem with maps on Wikimedia wikis that used <mapframe> when you clicked on the link to another map service. Open Street Map or Google Maps are examples of other map services. If you had marked a place on the map the marker would not be in the same place on the other map service. It was in the middle of the map. This has now been fixed. [131]
Changes this week
- Very old and inactive unpublished translations in the Content Translation database will be removed. This is because of technical maintenance. If you have not worked on a translation after 1 January 2016 you will lose it after 6 July. If you want to keep the unfinished translation you need to open it before 6 July with the Content Translation tool. You can continue working on it later. Translations that were started or have been worked on after 1 January 2016 will not be affected.
- There is no new Mediawiki version this week.
- EventStreams is a new way to show activity on Wikimedia wikis. It works with the recent changes feed. It will do more things later. It will replace RCStream. Tools that use RCStream should move to EventStreams before 7 July. Tech News wrote about this in the 2017/07 issue. [132]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Precious five years!
Five years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Has it been that long? Gosh. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yes ;) - Thank you for Project Y for TFA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- ... and for Isidor Isaac Rabi on his birthday! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- ... today for Chicago Pile-1 of which you said: "I find it fascinating that you can pile rocks in a heap, and strange and wonderful things happen. Based on the science of neutrons, whose existence was demonstrated just ten years before, and which cannot be seen, only inferred."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- Have a Merry Christmas Gerda. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:06, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Apr to Jun 17 Milhist article reviewing
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 9 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period Apr to Jun 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
DYK for Landing on Long Island
On 10 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Landing on Long Island, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there was an amphibious invasion of Long Island in 1943? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Landing on Long Island. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Landing on Long Island), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 12:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There are sometimes links to pages about the same thing on other Wikimedia projects. A Wikipedia article about Berlin can link to the Wikivoyage guide or Wiktionary entry about Berlin. You can now see when that page has a badge. A badge could be the star that shows that an article is a featured article. [133]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 11 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 12 July. It will be on all wikis from 13 July (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 11 July at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Mobile users will be able to edit Wikipedia without JavaScript. This will make it possible to edit the wikis from older mobile phones. This will probably happen on 18 July for most wikis. [134]
- We will not use Tidy on Wikimedia wikis in the future. It will be replaced by June 2018. It could be earlier. Editors will need to fix pages that could break. You can read the simplified instructions for editors.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Richard H. Carmichael
On 11 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richard H. Carmichael, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Richard H. Carmichael was shot down on 20 August 1944 while leading the 462d Bombardment Group in the bombing of Yawata, the first daylight air raid on Japan since the Tokyo Raid in 1942? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richard H. Carmichael. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Richard H. Carmichael), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 July 2017
- News and notes: French chapter woes, new affiliates and more WMF team changes
- Featured content: Spectacular animals, Pine Trees screens, and more
- In the media: Concern about access and fairness, Foundation expenditures, and relationship to real-world politics and commerce
- Recent research: The chilling effect of surveillance on Wikipedia readers
- Gallery: A mix of patterns
- Humour: The Infobox Game
- Traffic report: Film, television and Internet phenomena reign with some room left over for America's birthday
- Technology report: New features in development; more breaking changes for scripts
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 3 wrap-up
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- "Wikimedia Labs" is now called "Cloud VPS". "Wikimedia Tool Labs" is now called "Wikimedia Toolforge". This is to help clarify the purpose of these services. [135]
Problems
- On some pages, the Table of Contents is not being shown. It will normally appear if you edit the page again. Investigation is currently ongoing. [136]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 18 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 19 July. It will be on all wikis from 20 July (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 18 July at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topic this week is: Migrate to HTML5 section ids. [137] The meeting will be on 19 July at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Page Previews, currently a Beta Feature, will be enabled for logged-out users for all remaining Wikipedias (with the exception of English and German) the week of 24 July. An A/B test will be run on English Wikipedia to collect data before approaching the community for further discussion. [138]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations!
The Military history A-Class Medal with Diamonds | ||
I hearby award you an A-class Medal with Diamonds, for your work on Tube Alloys, Project E, and Ernest Titterton, promoted between May and July 2017. For the coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC) |
not sure
whether you take it any particular way - close to a doppelganger there [139] JarrahTree 10:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- CSS in templates will be stored in a separate page in the future. This will make it easier to make templates look good on mobile devices. This now works on mediawiki.org and Wikitech. It will come to more wikis later. [140][141][142]
-
.mw-ui-constructive
modifier class is deprecated and has been removed. [143]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 25 July. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 26 July. It will be on all wikis from 27 July (calendar).
- It will be possible to restrict who can send you notifications on a wiki. This new feature will accessible in your preferences, in the Notifications tab, on Wednesday, July 26. Please see the documentation. [144]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 25 July at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the Wikimedia Foundation July 2017 Metrics & Activities Meeting. The meeting is about how Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement are perceived and understood by the world. The meeting will be on 27 July at 19:00 (UTC). See the agenda and how to join.
Future changes
- New Filters for Edit Review, at the moment available as a Beta feature, will be released by default for the Recent Changes in September.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign
On 25 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign relied on aircraft (example pictured) and "Fuzzy Wuzzy Angels"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Charles Moses
On 25 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles Moses, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charles Moses escaped from Singapore with Major General Gordon Bennett, led a cavalry regiment at the Battle of Buna-Gona, and crossed the Rhine with the British commandos? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles Moses. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Charles Moses), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Martin F. Scanlon
On 26 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martin F. Scanlon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martin F. Scanlon was one of the Early Birds of Aviation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martin F. Scanlon. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Martin F. Scanlon), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Quote at end of Oppenheimer article
This may seem like a bizarrely late comment, but I was just looking at the J. Robert Oppenheimer article, and I wanted to thank you for adding the Bhagavad Gita quote at the very end of the article on 27 February 2011. The quote provides the perfect conclusion to the article and helps give it the literary distinction which Wikipedia articles are often accused of lacking. Gildir (talk) 03:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Never too late. Thank you! Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Some pages show the error
Lua error in mw.wikibase.entity.lua at line 34: The entity data must be a table obtained via mw.wikibase.getEntityObject
. This problem happens on pages with a Lua module that uses Wikidata. The developers are working on fixing the problem. You can fix a page by opening it for editing and then saving without changing anything. [145] - Wikidata and German Wikipedia could not be edited for an hour on 28 July. You can read why and how we could avoid it in the future in the incident report.
Changes later this week
- Some wikis already have the larger and brighter OOjs UI edit page buttons. All remaining wikis except Commons will have these from 1 August. [146]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 1 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 2 August. It will be on all wikis from 3 August (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 1 August at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The default font in the edit window will soon change for some users. Instead of using the browser default it will be monospace. Users can change this in their preferences. This should only change this for some users on Macs and iOS devices. [147]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 August 2017
- Recent research: Wikipedia can increase local tourism by +9%; predicting article quality with deep learning; recent behavior predicts quality
- WikiProject report: Comic relief
- In the media: Wikipedia used to judge death penalty, arms smuggling, Indonesian governance, and HOTTEST celebrity
- Traffic report: Swedish countess tops the list
- Featured content: Everywhere in the lead
- Technology report: Introducing TechCom
- Humour: WWASOHs and ETCSSs
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now see which Wikipedia language versions are read in a specific country. This tool is called Wikipedia Views Visualized. [148]
- The Architecture Committee is now the Wikimedia Technical Committee. You can read the charter. [149]
Problems
- You can get an email when a page on your watchlist was edited. You can choose not to get emails for minor edits. There is a bug that means that you then don't get an email when someone does a normal edit after a minor edit. The developers are working on fixing this. Until it has been fixed you can activate "Email me also for minor edits of pages and files" at the bottom of "User profile" in your preferences if you want to. [150]
- The thanks button sometimes didn't work for mobile users. This was because of a new bug and has now been fixed. [151]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 8 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 9 August. It will be on all wikis from 10 August (calendar).
Future changes
- Editors and readers who still use Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP will not be able to use Wikipedia. Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP can't connect securely to the wikis. When we allow them to do so it means that we get less security for everyone else. If you use Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP you can install Firefox 52 ESR instead. Around 0.1% of the traffic to the Wikimedia wikis comes from Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP. [152]
- Links to sections on Wikipedia don't work well in languages that don't use the Latin script. The URL in the address bar in your browser shows Latin characters like
.D0.A1.D1.81.D1.8B.D0.BB.D0.BA.D0.B8
instead of the section heading in the wiki's language. Links to sections in non-Latin scripts will be in the script of that wiki in the future. This will happen in the next few months. [153][154] - Wiki pages printed by the web browser "Print" function will have an updated style. This new style will be similar to the when you download a page as PDF. It will be better at showing tables, infoboxes and headings. [155][156]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Milhistbot
G'day Hawkeye. Ian Rose passed Talk:Bill McCann at ACR earlier today, but Milhistbot doesn't seem to have run as yet. He also passed a couple of others at the same time, and Milhistbot doesn't seem to have run for them either. Am I being impatient or is there a glitch? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure. I may have been holding it up with some work I was doing here. It has run okay. I will keep an eye on it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Bureaucrats can now set users as confirmed. Previously only stewards could do this on most wikis. Nothing will change for wikis that have previously decided to let administrators set users as confirmed. [157]
Problems
- The symbols in the language list that show that an article is good or featured in that language doesn't work. Links to the Commons category in the sidebar doesn't work either. The developers are working on fixing it. [158][159]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 15 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 16 August. It will be on all wikis from 17 August (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Base development information
G'day, Hawkeye, hope you are well. Recently, I've done a some work on a couple of articles: Battle of Cape Gloucester and Land Battle of Vella Lavella. I wonder if you have any more information on base development (or any other aspect), that you might be keen on adding to either article? Thank you for your time. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 03:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I can add a section to each article. Give me a few days. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- I have added sections on base development to both articles. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hawkeye. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- G'day, again, I've expanded a couple more that could do with the Hawkeye touch if you are keen: Battle of the Green Islands and Battle of the Treasury Islands. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- I have added a couple of paragraphs on base development to each article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- G'day, Hawkeye, as part of my own island hopping campaign, I've finished working on the Landings at Cape Torokina article for the timebeing. If you get a chance, would you mind taking a look and adding the base development information as per before? I will move on to the battles of the perimeter shortly, with a view to finally rounding out the Bougainville campaign articles but it will probably take me until the end of the year at the my present rate of effort. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- G'day again, Hawk, sorry to bother you with this one again, but I wasn't sure if you've seen this or not. Would you be keen to add something to the Landings at Cape Torokina article? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry. I missed it. I will have a look. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- G'day again, Hawk, sorry to bother you with this one again, but I wasn't sure if you've seen this or not. Would you be keen to add something to the Landings at Cape Torokina article? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- G'day, Hawkeye, as part of my own island hopping campaign, I've finished working on the Landings at Cape Torokina article for the timebeing. If you get a chance, would you mind taking a look and adding the base development information as per before? I will move on to the battles of the perimeter shortly, with a view to finally rounding out the Bougainville campaign articles but it will probably take me until the end of the year at the my present rate of effort. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- I have added a couple of paragraphs on base development to each article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- G'day, again, I've expanded a couple more that could do with the Hawkeye touch if you are keen: Battle of the Green Islands and Battle of the Treasury Islands. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:51, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, Hawkeye. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:07, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- I have added sections on base development to both articles. Hawkeye7 (talk) 08:24, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
- Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Shepards Grove
Happy to assist and recreate as a skeleton any pages that have to be deleted for copyvio purposes in the future. Deletion and recreation is much easier than rev-del'ing up to hundreds of revisions. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- I've just deleted Hahn Air Base for the same reason. I'll wait a day and recreate a skeleton article. Buckshot06 (talk) 01:18, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- I think that is a good way to do it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now test the new Timeless skin on the test wiki and mediawiki.org. You can turn it on in your preferences. You can report bugs in Phabricator. It will come to more wikis soon. [160][161]
- Your watchlist can now have the option to unwatch pages. You have to turn this on in your preferences. [162]
- If a table has several columns you can often choose which column you want to use to sort the table. This has not worked for some columns for readers who have used Firefox or Safari. This has now been fixed. [163]
- The RelatedArticles extension has shown related pages on Wikivoyages. You will now see the related pages at the end of the article together with an image. Previously the links were in the sidebar. Wikis that want this extension can request it on Phabricator.
Changes later this week
- Videos will now be played in the WebM format in all browsers. Previously some browsers used Ogg Theora (.ogv). If you use Safari, Internet Explorer or Edge you may see slower playback speed at high resolutions. Instead we will get better quality and smaller file size. You can still upload video as Ogg files. They are automatically converted to WebM. This doesn't affect Ogg audio files. [164]
- The default font in the edit window will change for some users this week. Instead of using the browser default, it will be monospace. Users can change this in their preferences. This should only change this for some users on Macs and iOS devices. [165]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 22 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 23 August. It will be on all wikis from 24 August (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 23 August at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 22 August at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Project Emily
Hello! Your submission of Project Emily at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dl2000 (talk) 00:35, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Project Emily
Hi Hawkeye7, 3 poss tweaks
- ) "Implicit in Wilson's to develop..." - missing word?
- "decision" Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- ) "Its first Thor missile arrived at RAF Lakenheath on a Douglas C-124 Globemaster II transport aircraft on 19 September, and was delivered to RAF Feltwell on 19 September." - same day?
- The first date should be 29 August. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- ) "McNamara's decision Skybolt..." - something missing?
- "to cancel". Adfded. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Best regards, JennyOz (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you. Much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 14:08, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
DYK for John William Alexander O'Brien
On 24 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John William Alexander O'Brien, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John O'Brien presided over the military court that tried and acquitted Japanese Admiral Soemu Toyoda? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John William Alexander O'Brien. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John William Alexander O'Brien), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League
On 26 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Sydney Metro Blues (pictured) are the 2017 Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League champions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Women's National Wheelchair Basketball League), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Mervyn Brogan
On 27 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mervyn Brogan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mervyn Brogan was the first Australian Chief of the General Staff to have a university degree? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mervyn Brogan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mervyn Brogan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Operation Grapple
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Grapple you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:00, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Syntax highlighting is now a beta feature on Wikimedia wikis with text written from left to right. It will come to right-to-left wikis later. This beta feature is based on CodeMirror. [166][167]
- You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device or IP address that have logged in to your account before you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can turn this off or choose to get an email notification in your preferences. You can also turn on to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address. [168]
Problems
- Some pages show the error
Lua error in mw.wikibase.entity.lua at line 34: The entity data must be a table obtained via mw.wikibase.getEntityObject
. This problem happens on pages with a Lua module that use Wikidata. This has now been fixed and no new pages will get this problem. You still need to fix pages that were broken before and still show the error message. You can see how on this page. [169]
Changes later this week
- You can block users from sending you notifications. [170]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 29 August. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 30 August. It will be on all wikis from 31 August (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 29 August at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the next meeting with the Technical Committee. The topic this week is Migrate to HTML5 section ids. The meeting will be on 30 August at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- In the future you will have global preferences. This means you could set something in your preferences to work in the same way on all wikis. You will not be forced to use global preferences. The developers are now asking if editors need exceptions. This is where you want to use global settings on almost all wikis, but have some wikis where you want it to work in a different way. If you want this you need to tell the developers now. You can do so on the talk page. [171]
- New filters for edit review is a beta feature to improve recent changes pages. It will work on watchlists from 5 September. [172]
- The jQuery library will be upgraded to version 3 in September 2017. Wikis can ask on Phabricator to get it early, so they can help find and solve problems now.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:09, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Operation Grapple
The article Operation Grapple you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Operation Grapple for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Operation Grapple
The article Operation Grapple you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Grapple for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
I broke FACBot's featured content announcements
I changed Template:Announcements/New featured content to a tableless layout. Since I didn't touch the *
lists, I didn't think I'd mess up FACBot. So this diff is my fault, sorry. I've added newlines after each list, like it was before — diff. I hope that fixes it. If not, I'll revert my changes. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 05:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- I thought it would be okay too. But I'm kind of lazy, which is why I use Bots. Your proposed fix should be okay. The Bot looks for the "Articles (15, most recent first)" line. It obtains the number to keep from that line. It adds the new entry, and then counts the lines from there. So ones beyond 15 are omitted. (This allows you to change the number of entries.) It assumes it has reached the end of the section when it reaches a blank line or the "Topics (15, most recent first)" line. I have just now told it to respond to your
</div>
card as well. So you shouldn't need the blank lines. Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)- Looking good now — diff. Thanks! Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 00:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Hawkeye, this FA article is currently proposed to be included in On This Day on main page tomorrow, 2 Sept. In the last section, Aftermath, it has "Edwards and his deputy Jim Cairns led large anti-war protests." It looks to me like edits done 19 June 2011 made it read as if referring to the previously mentioned "Peter Edwards, a military historian at the Australian War Memorial". Can you please have a look at/reword it? JennyOz (talk) 06:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- It was referring to him. Originally it said "In 1970, Labor leader [[Gough Whitlam]] posed with the [[Vietcong]] flag,<ref>Edwards (1997), p. 290.</ref> and his deputy [[Jim Cairns]] led large anti-war protests." The first clause is untrue, misrepresenting the source, and then poor edits trying to correct this mistake mixed up the footnote with the text. I remember Jim Cairns. When I was at Monash Uni in the 1990s he used to show up on Fridays and sell books. But he was not Peter Edwards' deputy. I can only imagine the look on Peter Edward's face if he read this! Anyway, I have corrected it, and made some minor changes. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for so promptly fixing the nonsensical bit and for the extra changes. JennyOz (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
WikiCup 2017 September newsletter
Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
- We are asking Tech News readers five questions to make the newsletter better. You can answer the questions here. We are grateful for every reply we get.
Recent changes
- The RevisionSlider user interface has changed. You can now select revisions by clicking on the bars. You can move the blue knob past the yellow one and the yellow one will move along, and the other way around. [173][174]
Problems
- Some users have problems loading very large watchlists. It is working better than earlier but the problem has not been solved. The developers are working on fixing it. Until it has been fixed you can turn on "Expand watchlist to show all changes, not just the most recent" in your preferences and see if it helps. [175]
Changes later this week
- New filters for edit review is a beta feature to improve recent changes pages. It will work on watchlists from 5 September. [176]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 5 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 6 September. It will be on all wikis from 7 September (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 5 September at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can see a presentation about and discuss the new Technical Committee on 5 September at 17:30 (UTC). There will be a presentation on YouTube and a discussion in
#wikimedia-office
on Freenode. You can use the web chat. [177]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 September 2017
- From the editors: What happened at Wikimania?
- News and notes: Basselpedia; WMF Board of Trustees appointments
- Featured content: Warfighters and their tools or trees and butterflies
- Traffic report: A fortnight of conflicts
- Special report: Biomedical content, and some thoughts on its future
- Recent research: Discussion summarization; Twitter bots tracking government edits; extracting trivia from Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject YouTube
- Technology report: Latest tech news
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 4 wrap-up
- Humour: Bots
DYK for Wilfrid Oulton
On 8 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilfrid Oulton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wilfrid Oulton was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for sinking three U-boats in one month? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wilfrid Oulton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wilfrid Oulton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 00:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Four Award
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Project Y. epicgenius (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC) |
Four Award #2
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on High Explosive Research. epicgenius (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Bugle article
In the Battle of Pilckem Ridge, General Sir Hubert Gough attempts to break through the German defensive positions, and then push forward. The planned advance is still a limited one, the final objective about 5,000 yards (4,600 m) distant.
No, no a thousand times no! The green line was the objective, 3,500 yds distant at most. An extra (red) line was added to mark the limit of possible exploitations by fresh troops, where German resistance had collapsed or ground was undefended. The red line was not the objective. Troops who advanced beyond the range of their divisional artillery according to this scheme, were to be protected by medium and heavy artillery instead. It was a break-in not a breakthrough attempt. See the Pilckem article for the details. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 10:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Hmm, I can't comment on the distance question but I will have to take responsibility for changing Hawkeye's original "break into" to "break through", simply because the original sounded like a burglary attempt to my ignorant ears...! I've since reverted the wording to "break into". Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- That term seems to have as many definitions as people who use it, which causes endless confusion. There's no doubt that the plan was for several bite and hold attacks but the truth of the matter is buried by decades of derivative garbage following Lloyd George et al. See History of the Great War 1917 Part II, not that I'm bitter mind. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 12:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right. Corrected the article. The use of the medium artillery (the 60-pounders and 6-inch howitzers) was a Gough touch. During the advance to the Hindenburg Line it had been found that they could displace as fast as the field artillery. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:51, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oh that's a good point, I'll work it into the article. Regards and thanks. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- That term seems to have as many definitions as people who use it, which causes endless confusion. There's no doubt that the plan was for several bite and hold attacks but the truth of the matter is buried by decades of derivative garbage following Lloyd George et al. See History of the Great War 1917 Part II, not that I'm bitter mind. ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 12:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Frederick Brundrett
Hello! Your submission of Frederick Brundrett at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Vensatry (talk) 12:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can get a notification when a page you created is connected to a Wikidata item. You can choose to get these notifications in your preferences. Some wikis already had this option. It is now available on all wikis. [178]
- The Newsletter extension is now on mediawiki.org. The newsletter extension is for newsletters where you can subscribe by getting a notification when a new issue has been published. It will come to more wikis later. [179]
- The Linter extension helps you find technical errors in articles. There is now a new high-priority category:
tidy-whitespace-bug
. This usually affects templates with horizontal lists. You can read more about using Linter and the Tidy whitespace bug. [180]
Problems
- Tech News 2017/36 reported about new filters for edit review coming to watchlists. This was planned to happen last week. It will happen next week instead. [181]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 September. It will be on all wikis from 14 September (calendar).
- OOjs UI will be updated. This could affect some icons. You can read more about the changes.
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 13 September at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 12 September at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You can't use OCG to create PDFs after 1 October. This is because of technical problems. You can use Electron instead. Most PDFs are already created with Electron. Electron will get missing features before 1 October. You can create books but they will not have all planned features until November or December. You can read more on mediawiki.org.
- New filters for edit review are available now on recent changes as a beta feature. Some of those filters and other features will be deployed as default features in the coming weeks. Users will be able to opt out in their preferences. [182]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:15, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Non-diffusing subcats
Re: Category:American women mathematicians please read the language of WP:GHETTO and {{non-diffusing}}, particularly [emphasis added] "It includes mathematicians that can also be found in the parent category, or in diffusing subcategories of the parent." Someone in Category:American women mathematicians must also be in either Category:American mathematicians (the parent) or another subcategory of Category:American mathematicians (i.e. in the case of Nancy Farley Wood, Category:20th-century American mathematicians and Category:Mathematicians from Illinois and Category:Mathematicians from Missouri.) Since Category:American mathematicians is otherwise diffused by century and state (in addition to sub-field of study, such as Category:American geodesists), it is not necessary for the parent category to house any articles and can instead be fully diffused using at least two schemes. Please ping me if you respond here. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Koavf: We've been through this before. Category:American mathematicians is a marked as a non-diffusing category of Category:American mathematicians. All the articles in it must also be in the parent category. Any attempt to move them into an ghetto will be regarded as misogyny, and I will have to report you to ANI. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:00, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Did you read anything I wrote above? First off, Category:American mathematicians is not marked as non-diffusing of itself. Secondly, if you look at Category:American women mathematicians and also look at WP:GHETTO, you will see that biographies can be in a different scheme to diffuse the parent. Which this one is. Do you understand the language of the template itself? Why is it you think that Category:American mathematicians cannot be fully diffused by century, state, or some other scheme aside from gender? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:13, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Alternately, let me put it this way: If you were to post to WP:ANI, what would you write? If you tell me your thought process, I may be able to address your concerns. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- This seems to defeat the whole point of marking the category as non-diffusing. We came under severe criticism for this sort of categorisation, which was portrayed in the mainstream media as proof that Wikipedia is misogynist, threatening my ability to contribute. Categorisation by state seems arbitrary and reduces the value of the categorisation. Confronts anyone looking at the category with precisely the view we wanted to avoid. Most states have only one person in them. Physicists are not categorised this way. Looking at Richard Hamming, I note that he is not categorised this way. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- They only have one because I am making it now. They will be more full soon. I think the criticism was that women were somehow segregated away and men were seen as normative in the parent category. (I don't agree with the assessment but still, that was the problem.) Subcategorizing by field/genre, century, or state provides a way to keep the parent category empty in the first place, which is precisely what will resolve the complaint. Some categories (e.g. Category:American mimes) are too small to need any diffusion but if there is a diffusion by men/women, there can be one by some other scheme as well. Again, I'm sorry if you misunderstood but please look at the actual text of the tag: subdividing by another scheme is entirely consistent with a category being non-diffusing and is exactly what WP:GHETTO calls for. Finally, as an aside, a category like "Category:Mathematicians from Ohio" also serves to diffuse up a larger hierarchy like Category:Scientists from Ohio → Category:Academics from Ohio → Category:People from Ohio. We don't need it so granular as Category:Geometers from Ohio but having it as broad as Category:People from Ohio would make for unnavigable categories. So a triple intersection of nationality, occupation, and location is very useful for subdividing all three of those parent schemes. Does that make sense? Are we on the same page? If there's something I'm missing, please let me know. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- We're on the same page. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Carry on then. Sigh. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks man. Cooler heads prevailed. Onwards and upwards. Etc. I'm glad that we could discuss it. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Carry on then. Sigh. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- We're on the same page. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- They only have one because I am making it now. They will be more full soon. I think the criticism was that women were somehow segregated away and men were seen as normative in the parent category. (I don't agree with the assessment but still, that was the problem.) Subcategorizing by field/genre, century, or state provides a way to keep the parent category empty in the first place, which is precisely what will resolve the complaint. Some categories (e.g. Category:American mimes) are too small to need any diffusion but if there is a diffusion by men/women, there can be one by some other scheme as well. Again, I'm sorry if you misunderstood but please look at the actual text of the tag: subdividing by another scheme is entirely consistent with a category being non-diffusing and is exactly what WP:GHETTO calls for. Finally, as an aside, a category like "Category:Mathematicians from Ohio" also serves to diffuse up a larger hierarchy like Category:Scientists from Ohio → Category:Academics from Ohio → Category:People from Ohio. We don't need it so granular as Category:Geometers from Ohio but having it as broad as Category:People from Ohio would make for unnavigable categories. So a triple intersection of nationality, occupation, and location is very useful for subdividing all three of those parent schemes. Does that make sense? Are we on the same page? If there's something I'm missing, please let me know. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- This seems to defeat the whole point of marking the category as non-diffusing. We came under severe criticism for this sort of categorisation, which was portrayed in the mainstream media as proof that Wikipedia is misogynist, threatening my ability to contribute. Categorisation by state seems arbitrary and reduces the value of the categorisation. Confronts anyone looking at the category with precisely the view we wanted to avoid. Most states have only one person in them. Physicists are not categorised this way. Looking at Richard Hamming, I note that he is not categorised this way. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Whiteghost.ink (talk) 03:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Naval Air Station Albany
I've just deleted this page, which was the former Turner Air Force Base, as a likely copyvio (Bwmoll3), unfortunate as it is. Happy to recreate a skeleton on request. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Upcoming book on Operation Grapple
Hi, Have you seen that the ANU Press will release a book on Operation Grapple later this year? (probably quite soon as they've started promoting it). The details are here. I think that the ANU press puts PDFs of all their books on the internet for free. Cheers, Nick-D (talk) 10:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- No, I hadn't seen it. Thanks for that! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- The book is now available here, Cheers Nick-D (talk) 09:45, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
The Italian nationalist impostor
I can't remember if you were involved but a while back, several of us went through a lot of Western Desert Campaign articles removing his interpolations. There was a list of articles to check and I wonder if Second Italo-Ethiopian War was one? The Analysis section looks a bit dodgy, could he have had a hand in it?
- PS if it was Oz Rupert or someone else apols. Keith-264 (talk) 12:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Project Emily
On 16 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Project Emily, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British crews launched Thor intermediate-range ballistic missiles (example pictured) from Vandenberg Air Force Base as part of Project Emily? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Project Emily. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Project Emily), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now see contributions from an IP range at Special:Contributions. Before you could only see contributions from single IP addresses. Some older contributions from IP ranges could be missing at first because it will take some time to add them. [183][184]
- Flow has been re-scoped to become Structured Discussions and the development has restarted. Phabricator projects and repositories have been renamed. [185]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 19 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 20 September. It will be on all wikis from 21 September (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 19 September at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 20 September at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- We are replacing Tidy on Wikimedia wikis. Editors need to fix pages that could break. You can read the simplified instructions for editors. Some wikis have already switched. If your wiki would like to switch to the new format now, you can file a task.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lorna Arnold
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lorna Arnold you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jackyd101 -- Jackyd101 (talk) 23:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Revolutionary War listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Revolutionary War. Since you had some involvement with the Revolutionary War redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Appah Rao (talk) 05:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lorna Arnold
The article Lorna Arnold you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lorna Arnold for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jackyd101 -- Jackyd101 (talk) 10:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Freedom of Navigation operations
I'm looking for a couple of wise Milhist heads to provide a little outside expertise at Talk:USS John S. McCain (DDG-56)#Comparable articles. Would you please mind taking a look and putting your point of view? Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
GA reassess
Rommel myth, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. LargelyRecyclable (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Frederick Brundrett
On 24 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frederick Brundrett, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Frederick Brundrett, the UK's Chief Scientific Adviser to the Ministry of Defence, was one of Britain's oldest first-class field hockey players? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frederick Brundrett. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Frederick Brundrett), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 September 2017
- News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL
- Humour: Chickenz
- Recent research: Wikipedia articles vs. concepts; Wikipedia usage in Europe
- Technology report: Flow restarted; Wikidata connection notifications
- Gallery: Chicken mania
- Traffic report: Fights and frights
- Featured content: Flying high
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Wikitext syntax highlighting is a beta feature on Wikimedia wikis with text written from left to right. This beta feature is based on CodeMirror. You can now search through the entire article with
CTRL
+F
orcmd
+F
when you edit. Before it just searched through a part of the article. The developers are also fixing a couple of other bugs. [186][187] - Administrators on wikis that use Structured Discussions as a beta feature or by default can now create and move Structured Discussions boards. Structured Discussions was previously called Flow. [188]
Changes later this week
- You now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device or IP address that have logged in to your account before you will be notified after five failed attempts. For security reasons you will soon get an email by default when someone tries to log in to your account and when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address. This can be turned off in your preferences. [189]
- Users with extremely old browsers (for example Netscape 2–4, released from 1995–1997) which do not support Unicode will no longer be able to edit. They should try to install a new browser. [190]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 September. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 27 September. It will be on all wikis from 28 September. (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 27 September at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The Wikimedia Foundation Readers department has proposed changing the mobile website. You can read more on mediawiki.org. This would be a big change.
- You can't use OCG to create PDFs after 1 October. This is because of technical problems. You can still create PDFs. Tech News 2017/37 said the function to create PDFs from books would still work. It is now clear it will not work for the next few months. The developers are working on fixing this. You can read more on mediawiki.org.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:59, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement
On 26 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan described the 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement as the "great prize"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 01:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks very much for the review, and surrounding discussions! Take care, — fortunavelut luna 18:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now use preload features in the visual editor. This means you can create links to create new pages and some text will already be in the edit window when someone clicks on it. [191]
Changes later this week
- If you have turned on "Automatically enable most beta features" you will now get the 2017 wikitext editor. Before this you had to turn it on manually even though it is a beta feature. [192]
- Special:Block and Special:Unblock will get the OOUI look. [193]
- The jQuery library will be upgraded to version 3 on all Wiktionary wikis from 2 October. It will be on all non-Wikipedia wikis from 4 October. It will be on all wikis from 5 October. [194]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 3 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 4 October. It will be on all wikis from 5 October (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 3 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 4 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- A new feature called Reading Lists are coming to the Wikipedia mobile apps. First it will be in the Android version. Reading Lists are a private user preference where you can see lists of articles on multiple devices. You can give feedback on this feature. [195]
- The search function has used fallback languages for language analysis. This means a language could be analysed with the grammar of a completely unrelated language to find related words. This will be removed from most wikis the week starting with 9 October. You can read more and give feedback.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Jul to Sep 2017 Milhist article reviewing
The WikiChevrons | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 19 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period Jul to Sep 2017. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC) |
DYK for Lorna Arnold
On 5 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lorna Arnold, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as UK secretary in the Economic Directorate of the Allied Control Council in post-war Berlin, Lorna Arnold slept with a revolver under her pillow? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lorna Arnold. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lorna Arnold), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 03:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Submissions for The 10,000 Challenge (Canada)
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its first anniversary. We'd love to have more featured content submitted, such as your article Montreal Laboratory, or any other well-sourced Canada-related articles you have created or expanded since November 2016.
You can use this link to submit articles to the challenge. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 22:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
A-Class medal with Diamonds
The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds | ||
On behalf of the coordinators of the Military History WikiProject, I hereby award you the A-Class medal with Diamonds for your work on Operation Hurricane, Philip Baxter, and Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign. Congratulations! Biblio (talk) 15:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The number of active users listed by
{{NUMBEROFACTIVEUSERS}}
and on Special:Statistics will now only include Wikidata edits as activity on Wikidata and not on other wikis too. [196] - Previously you could create wiki links starting with two colons. Now you need to use one colon. [[::File:X.jpg]] now has to be [[:File:X.jpg]]. There is now a new Linter category. You can see a list on Special:Linterrors/multi-colon-escape. The Linter extension helps you find technical errors in articles. You can read more about using Linter. [197]
Problems
- You will not be able to edit or upload files to Commons for around 30 minutes on 11 October. This will start at 06:00 UTC. This is because of work to let Commons show 3D models. [198]
Changes later this week
- The font in the edit window is monospace by default. Today you can change preferences to another font family or use "the browser default" instead of monospace. Switching to the browser default has only changed the font on Macs. The option to use browser default will be removed this week. [199]
- If you want to print a page or make a PDF of a page you can do so in the side menu. The way the pages look when you do this will change. You can read more on mediawiki.org.
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 10 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 11 October. It will be on all wikis from 12 October (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 10 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 11 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Project Emily
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Project Emily you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Project Emily
The article Project Emily you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Project Emily for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:41, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Project Emily
The article Project Emily you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Project Emily for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
DYK for John D. Hoffman
On 15 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John D. Hoffman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John D. Hoffman was the only member of the Manhattan District to be awarded the Soldier's Medal, the United States Army's highest award for heroism in a non-combat situation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John D. Hoffman. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John D. Hoffman), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex ShihTalk 01:02, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes
Hi Hawkeye, thank you for reviewing all of these articles! I don't think I have ever had so many GA reviews on the go at once before. I was wondering if you wanted to sort out this 'first sentence' issue here rather than me try and discuss it in multiple places at once. Like I said before, that opening line is included as a quick introduction separately from the article overview per WP:TVLEAD, as is also done on the main series and season articles for the show. It is pretty basic information that can be confirmed by checking Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. and/or watching the episode, and it has never been challenged before, so it never seemed worth trying to work into the body of every single episode article. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Since they were all pretty similar, I thought it best to review them all at once. The lead is fine. All we are down to is a reference for the series and episode number. I realise that this is pretty basic information. But the whole Plot section is based on the assumption that the reader hasn't watched the episode. Furthermore, I'm not sure where the episode number is in the credits. But as long as we can find this fact somewhere it is okay. I have looked through the Production sections, and I concluded that enough information is there. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- The episode number should be sourced in the development section where the title is first noted, and many references in the articles will note the series so adjustments could be made there if you felt that was necessary. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- I have passed all six. I had some trouble with the GA page. Suggest that in future that all episodes be disambiguated with "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D" whether they need it or not. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks again! I think there would be some blow-back from other editors if I started over-disambiguating articles. All of the articles for the series are collected in Template:Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes anyway, and at List of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. episodes. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:08, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- I have passed all six. I had some trouble with the GA page. Suggest that in future that all episodes be disambiguated with "Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D" whether they need it or not. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- The episode number should be sourced in the development section where the title is first noted, and many references in the articles will note the series so adjustments could be made there if you felt that was necessary. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:59, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar | ||
Thanks for taking the effort to review the Agents of Shield episodes in such a short period of time. I had been trying to find the time to do so myself for weeks. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2017 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- When you edit a template with the visual editor it follows the template's
format
configuration on how to save it. You can now change the format in more powerful ways if your wiki wants it. [200][201] - The TwoColConflict extension is a new way to solve edit conflicts. It makes it easier to copy and paste the relevant text to the text field. It has been a beta feature for the last five months. You can now try out the new interface on a page where you will actually get simulated edit conflicts. You can give feedback to the developers.
Problems
- There is a problem with recent changes pages and your watchlist that show a large number of pages. Until it is fixed, Wikidata edits will not be shown on recent changes or in your watchlist on Commons or Russian Wikipedia. If necessary, Wikidata edits will be removed from all wikis. [202]
- Notifications are not working for some actions. For example some users don't get a notification when they are mentioned. The developers are working on fixing this. [203]
- Users on some wikis could not change their preferences. This has now been fixed. [204]
Changes later this week
- Editors and readers who still use Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP will not be able to use Wikipedia from 17 October. Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP can't connect securely to the wikis. When we allow them to do so it means that we get less security for everyone else. If you use Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP you can install Firefox 52 ESR instead. Around 0.1% of the traffic to the Wikimedia wikis comes from Internet Explorer 8 on Windows XP. [205]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 October. It will be on all wikis from 19 October (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 17 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 18 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2017
- News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!
- Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables
- Humour: Guys named Ralph
- In the media: Facebook and poetry
- Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK
- Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment
Hey! Looking for some help with this. I want a short paragraph on the Lancashire Fusiliers in WWI for background in the war memorial article, but I can't find anything reliable. Essentially I want a distilled version of Lancashire Fusiliers#First World War or something similar, but with less shitty sourcing (ie, not hobby websites). Can you suggest anything? Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- Nvm, I think I've found what I wanted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- That's good. There was a book on their activities in the Great War, which is available online. Anecdotally I have been told that the Lancashire Fusiliers being nearly wiped out on 25 April 1915 was a traumatic experience for the local community. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can use
ccnorm_contains_any
when you create an abuse filter. This can be used to look for multiple words or phrases within a string. It will find words where some characters have been replaced. You can read more in the documentation. [206]
Changes later this week
- When you search in some languages the search function could use specific other languages if the first language didn't work. This is called a fallback language. This didn't work properly and created bad searches. The search index is being fixed to work better. [207]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 24 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 25 October. It will be on all wikis from 26 October (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 24 October at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 25 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- There is a Structured Commons community focus group for Commons and Wikidata contributors who want to give input on structured data on Wikimedia Commons. You can sign up to join it. [208]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Salt Wells Pilot Plant
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salt Wells Pilot Plant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now block users from emailing you through the Wikimedia wikis. [209]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 31 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 1 November. It will be on all wikis from 2 November (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 31 October at 18:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 1 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
00:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Halloween cheer!
Hello Hawkeye7:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– LinguistunEinsuno 21:08, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results
The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:
- First Place - Adityavagarwal (submissions)
- Second Place - Vanamonde (submissions)
- Third Place - Cas Liber (submissions)
In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
- Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
- Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
- Featured List – Bloom6132 (submissions) and 1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
- Featured Pictures – SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
- Featured Topic – MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
- Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
- Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
- In The News – MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
- Good Article Review – Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.
Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.
Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.
We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Statement_by_Dank
Hi Hawkeye, it's been too long since we've chatted. I've decided I want to say something there, but first, I'm in search of clue. One way to get clue is to talk with people who disagree with me (particularly if they're making a statement at WP:RFAR, because people often truncate their statements drastically, and actually know a lot more than they're saying). You arrived at the opposite conclusion to mine. I don't think it's fair to say that Arbcom shouldn't take the case because they're not the best venue and they can't solve the whole problem, because there are parts of the problem that they and only they can solve. Arbcom is much more likely not to fix something that they could actually fix than the other way around; there is little chance that they will go all bull-in-a-china-shop. They may go the other direction, and do something minimal and limited to just the two principal parties. But even a minimal ruling can be one important step along the way, as people grapple with this very extensive and tough problem.
So, I'm leaving this note for both you and GoldenRing, for two reasons: 1. you guys are the only two who disagree with me (although we do have a few noncommital statements from others), so you're the ones in the best position to explain to me why I'm wrong, and 2. Arbcom is hesitating, and I can understand that ... they're not masochists. But I think it would be good to apply peer pressure to get them to step up and do the right thing, the necessary thing, and a unanimous case request would be a suitable form of peer pressure. IMO, Arbcom is a kind of single point of failure for Wikipedia ... if they turn away from disputes that can legitimately be framed as policy violations and that can't be solved elsewhere, then the whole dispute-resolution system fails. - Dank (push to talk) 19:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, my position is much closer to that of HJ Mitchell, but he can say that because he's an admin. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the strike, I appreciate it. Keeping my fingers crossed. - Dank (push to talk) 23:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi Hawkeye7 . I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
FAC reviewing barnstar
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
FAC can't function without people like you contributing reviews. Thank you for the one FAC image review, two source reviews, and six prose reviews you did during October. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC) |
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You will no longer see the patrol log on Special:Log unless you specifically select it. [210]
Changes later this week
- The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey begins on 6 November. You can post proposals from 19:00 UTC and until November 19.
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 7 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 8 November. It will be on all wikis from 9 November (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 8 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- URLs that link to sections on Wikimedia wikis with non-Latin scripts have looked like this:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия#.D0.98.D1.81.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.8F
instead ofhttps://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия#История
. This will soon be fixed. Old links will still work. [211][212]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Something with MilHistBot?
Hi Hawkeye, looks like the bot is overwriting Nick's and my updates to the Bugle issue on Template:WPMILHIST Announcements -- see the edits on 7 October for examples... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- The MilBot doesn't update that. I checked the log, and your update occurred while it was running. It took about a half an hour to collect all the information on the announcements page. It took a copy of the page at the start of the run and modified it, then updated the page. No edit conflict was reported. Hence, your edit was lost. There are two ways we can go:
- I can modify the run to assemble the information first, then get the page and update it, which will reduce the window down to a minute or less.
- I can modify the run to update the Bugle issue for you, based on what Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News says is the latest edition
- Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Richard F. Gordon Jr.
On 9 November 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Richard F. Gordon Jr., which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
DYK for 2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships
On 11 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Rollers won the 2017 Asia-Oceania Wheelchair Basketball Championships, while the Gliders came in second? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2017 IWBF Asia-Oceania Championships), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Your opinion about WW II
I added another reference about desertions in Italy in September 1943.I already edited Cassibile armistice to improve it.Thanks again.Kingofwoods (talk) 11:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Possible need for Milhistbot tweak
G'day Hawkeye, I see that you will shortly receive your last Diamonds. When that happens, Milhistbot will need to know that your next award with be an A-Class Cross. Is the bot set up for that as yet? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the MilHistBot is set up for this; but my next award will only be my 34th, so it should still be the A-Class medal with Diamonds. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Great. I meant the next one. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The diff you see when you compare two different versions of a page has changed on MediaWiki.org and the test wiki. This is to make it easier to find a text change in a moved paragraph. It will hopefully soon come to more wikis. You can report bugs in Phabricator. [213]
- A new user group on Commons will be able to upload MP3 files. The plan is to have this user group from 17 November. [214]
- Wikis using Flagged Revisions will get the New filters for Edit Review by default on the recent changes pages. It will be possible to opt-out in user preferences. [215]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 14 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 15 November. It will be on all wikis from 16 November (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 15 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Support for uploading and viewing 3D models is coming soon to Wikimedia Commons. The feature will support the .STL file format. You can see an example on the test wiki. [216]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Another bot question
The bot does not seem to have run on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Carol (film)/archive1. I'm not sure why, thought some indecision over who the nominator was might have something to do with it. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- The problem was [this edit]. The Bot couldn't work out the name of the nomination page. I have given it an extra hint to allow it to deal with cases like this. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Annabelle Lindsay
On 17 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Annabelle Lindsay, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after being injured, Annabelle Lindsay relinquished a scholarship to play college basketball in the United States but has since been awarded another to play wheelchair basketball? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Annabelle Lindsay. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Annabelle Lindsay), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
WikiCup 2018
So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 13:40, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Salt Wells Pilot Plant
The article Salt Wells Pilot Plant you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salt Wells Pilot Plant for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
This sentence — "The loss of the helicopters forced the 3rd Commando Brigade to advance across East Falkland on floor." — strikes me as very odd. I would have corrected the phrase "on floor", but perhaps its a British dialect that I don't understand as an American reader. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- A typo. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- If you use the Chrome web browser on Android you can see a download icon on the mobile website. You can download a formatted PDF. It will work in other mobile browsers in the future. [217]
- The abuse filter now has a function called
get_matches
. You can use it to store matches from regular expressions – one of each capturing group. You can read more in Phabricator.
Problems
- Last week's MediaWiki version didn't come to all Wikipedias because of a database crash. It will be on all wikis on 20 November. [218][219][220]
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 21 November at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 22 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Language converter syntax will no longer work inside external links. Wikitext like
http://-{zh-cn:foo.com; zh-hk:bar.com; zh-tw:baz.com}-
must be replaced. You will have to write-{zh-cn: http://foo.com ; zh-hk: http://bar.com ; zh-tw:http://baz.com }-
instead. This only affects languages with Language Converter enabled. Examples of such languages are Chinese and Serbian. This will happen next week. [221][222]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Gillian Rolton
On 21 November 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gillian Rolton, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT♦C 01:38, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewing
Hello, Hawkeye7.
I noticed you've done some constructive editing recently. |
New page reviewer granted
Hello Hawkeye7. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
- URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
- Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
- Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
- Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- As a personal note, I was very happy to see this request come through. Thank you for volunteering, even if it is only to help out in doses. Your content work is really remarkable :) TonyBallioni (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- As additional note, per your comments on the request page; while there are hundreds of users with the New page reviewer user right, almost all of the reviews are done by a very small number of reviewers, and the majority of users with the flag are not active. Any help that you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks very much. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 22:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
FL count
Hi, Hawkeye. I saw your edit here where you moved the total featured list count up by 3 and can't tell where you got the number from. The list you added had been present in another place (and under a different name), but I don't know how the figure would change otherwise. Where did you come up with the total? I looked through the most recent FL additions to see if one of us had forgotten to change the count, but it looks like we updated it properly, unless I'm missing something. Giants2008 (Talk) 16:30, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- I counted them. My problem is that Petscan indicates that there are only 3,224 featured lists. I removed several from the category yesterday that had been marked as featured lists but were not. (The creator had used another article as a template and copied the {{featured list}} template.) So the numbers don't add up. There could be duplicates, or (more likely) some lists that have been de-listed but are still there. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- That's odd. I'll alert the FL community on FLC talk and hopefully somebody there will be able to resolve the problem. Thanks for your diligence. Giants2008 (Talk) 16:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 November 2017
- News and notes: Cons, cons, cons
- Arbitration report: Administrator desysoped; How to deal with crosswiki issues; Mister Wiki case likely
- Technology report: Searching and surveying
- Interview: A featured article centurion
- WikiProject report: Recommendations for WikiProjects
- In the media: Open knowledge platform as a media institution
- Traffic report: Strange and inappropriate
- Featured content: We will remember them
- Recent research: Who wrote this? New dataset on the provenance of Wikipedia text
Band of Brothers
Probably fifteen more AfDs.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 01:18, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Polaris Sales Agreement
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Polaris Sales Agreement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sp33dyphil -- Sp33dyphil (talk) 01:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Polaris Sales Agreement
On 27 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polaris Sales Agreement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the United States supplied ballistic missiles (example pictured) to Great Britain under the Polaris Sales Agreement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Polaris Sales Agreement. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Polaris Sales Agreement), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
MacArthur’s Knighthood
Thanks for the link to the earlier discussion, however I think as it’s now written the article is inaccurate, as it suggests that the Order of the Bath is an Australian honor, which it simply isn’t. Perhaps it would make more sense to just include the fact that it was given on the advice of the Australian Government over the British Government’s objection? JCO312 (talk) 03:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- It was an Australian honour. The official position is:
The Imperial system of honours and awards was applied across many countries in the Commonwealth of Nations but the system was administered independently in each country. Awards within the system were bestowed by the governments of each of those countries. Australians who received Imperial campaign medals for service in the Australian armed forces received these awards from a grateful Australian Government and people.[223]
- Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
I actually still don’t think that answers the question. Campaign medals are different from orders of chivalry. Thus, while a Victoria Cross would be appropriately interpreted as an Australian honor if awarded under the circumstances you’re describing, the Order of the Bath is simply a British order. Put it another way, there is no such thing as the “Australian Order of the Bath.” JCO312 (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC) JCO312 (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- The text of the article is crystal clear: the Australian government had him appointed an honorary Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath. @Anthony Staunton: Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Australia was a full participant in the Imperial honours system so the recommendation and issue of campaign medals are no different from orders of chivalry. If the 'Victoria Cross would be appropriately interpreted as an Australian honor' then there should be no dispute about a lessor award. 83 Australian general officers receive the KCB or the CB, Macarthur received an honorary GCB and three other American officers received honorary CBs in the Second World War. They were all Australian honours. Anthony Staunton (talk) 09:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now test the new advanced search function beta feature on mediawiki.org. It makes it easier to use some of the special search functions that most editors don't know exist. It will come to German and Arabic Wikipedia this week. It will come to more wikis later. [224]
- You can now upload large files with the Internet Archive upload tool. Previously you could not upload files larger than 100 MB. [225]
- You can now use the Timeless skin on all wikis. You can choose skins in Special:Preferences#Appearance. [226]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 28 November. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 29 November. It will be on all wikis from 30 November (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 28 November at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 29 November at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean by "un-reviewed it again". I didn't review it, I wrote it. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
P.S. I have the autopatrolled user right. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know either. I know you wrote it. It wasn't on the New page patrol list; I went out there from a link you added to Paul Tibbetts. I mustr have donew something accidentally. My apologies for any inconvenience caused.
- PS: Submit the article to DYK. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gen 75 Committee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gen 75 Committee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gen 75 Committee
The article Gen 75 Committee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gen 75 Committee for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Gen 75 Committee
The article Gen 75 Committee you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gen 75 Committee for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:02, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement
The article 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 15:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
FYI
recreation 1 | ˌrɛkrɪˈeɪʃ(ə)n | noun [mass noun] activity done for enjoyment when one is not working: she rides for recreation | [as modifier] : sport and recreation facilities | [count noun] : his recreations included golf and rugby. ORIGIN late Middle English (also in the sense ‘mental or spiritual consolation’): via Old French from Latin recreatio(n-), from recreare ‘create again, renew’.
recreation 2 | ˌriːkrɪˈeɪʃ(ə)n | noun [mass noun] the action or process of creating something again: the periodic destruction and recreation of the universe. • [count noun] a re-enactment or simulation of something: they enjoyed television's recreations of more confident times.
- - Oxford American Sictionary
- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- "Re-creation" is mandated by the Commonwealth Style Guide. (6.119) My (British) Oxford did not have the two under the same entry, and Debrett's had them as different. So thanks for that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement
The article 1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1958 US–UK Mutual Defence Agreement for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Hawkeye7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- It is now possible to upload MP3 files to Commons. Only users with MP3 file upload rights can upload MP3 files. [227]
- You can now use live updates for recent changes if you use the new filters. This feature updates the filtered recent changes every three seconds when you activate it. [228]
- There is an experimental onion service for Wikimedia projects. [229]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 5 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 6 December. It will be on all wikis from 7 December (calendar).
- Very old versions of the Opera Web browser are no longer supported. This means that technical development will not be tested to make sure it works with those Opera versions. Use Opera 15 or above or another browser if you have problems. [230]
- Almost 170 wikis with no high-priority errors in Linter categories will switch to use the Remex parsing library. This is to replace Tidy. A few larger wikis such as German and Italian Wikipedia will also make this switch. It will happen on 5 December. Other wikis will be recommended to switch soon when they have fixed the errors that must be fixed. Tidy will be removed in the middle of 2018. [231][232]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 5 December at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 6 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey will decide what the Community Tech team will work on next year. You can vote for wishes on the survey page until 10 December. You can see what has happened to last year's wishes on the 2016 results page.
- The Community Liaisons team at the Wikimedia Foundation is looking for active tech ambassadors. This is to make sure the Wikimedia communities get all the information they need about new features and can be involved in the technical development. [233]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Polaris Sales Agreement
The article Polaris Sales Agreement you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Polaris Sales Agreement for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sp33dyphil -- Sp33dyphil (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Landing on Long Island
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Landing on Long Island you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 03:01, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for you help on Vietnam Veterans for Factual History
I appreciate the help. If you think the page is worth saving, please comment on the Afd page. Txantimedia (talk) 03:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Donn Eisele flight experience
@JustinTime55:I am having issues finding a source for Donn Eisele's flight experience. Do either of you have a book source or better Google fu than I have? Kees08 (Talk) 03:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- I checked his book, and another I have here, but I cannot find a source for the first two sentences. Thewy were inserted by an IP in 2016. They are probably correct, but I cannot find a source and suggest that they be removed. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt help. I have removed the sentences. When I work towards taking these articles to GA/FA, I plan on gathering as many books as I can for sources, which should fill any holes I am make by removing unsourced content. Thanks again! Kees08 (Talk) 07:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Mario Alberto Avilés
Hello Hawkeye7,
After creating the last 30+ new Catholic Bishops' pages, clearly I don't see what the problem is. I use the same template to create them and use two distinct references to corroborate the fact. The only thing missing from this one is the date of consecration(installation). It hasn't been announced yet since he was only appointed yesterday morning by the Pope. Roberto221 (talk) 10:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- My thinking was that he isn't a bishop, and won't become one until next year. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to join Women in Red
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.25% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Landing on Long Island
The article Landing on Long Island you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Landing on Long Island for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 23:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Review request
Thank you for your quick message Hawkeye7. I'd just like to ask you for a favour – could you please have a look at the short article Sukhoi Su-37, which is up for A-class review atm? The review page hasn't seen any activity for two weeks. Thank you, --Sp33dyphil (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Query re: pending ACCs
G'day Hawkeye, just wondered if I should create a new section on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Awards for ACCs, or whether you see them going under the existing Nominations for the A-Class Medal section with new wording? Given the different qualification requirements, it might be clearer to separate them, but I don't want to create work for you in tweaking Milhistbot. Let me know? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:35, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- I'd need to alter the way the Bot processes them. Since I'm going away, this would have to wait until January. OTOH, it is unlikely that this will be needed before then. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- I agree there is no rush, you need another five before it kicks in, but I thought I'd create the section now while I think of it. Is that OK? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:06, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
A-Class Medal with Diamonds
The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds | ||
On behalf of the Wikiproject Military history coordinators, I hereby award you the A-Class Medal with Diamonds for your outstanding work on developing for Operation Grapple, British hydrogen bomb programme, and Project Emily to meet the A-Class criteria. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC) |
2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Suggestion
Hi, I suspect that you need new ideas for articles about as much as you need a hole in the head, but there's scope for a really interesting article on the logistics for the 1999 INTERFET deployment. As you may have seen, over recent years a number of historians and military officers have published fairly detailed works arguing that INTERFET was actually a near run thing due to the state of the ADF's logistics capabilities (though they're over-egging things a bit IMO given that the operation was highly successful) and it does seem to have lead to some important improvements. Nick-D (talk) 23:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- There was a hopelessly misguided effort to increase the Army's teeth-to-tail ratio. I do have the material to write this, but I'm away at the moment, and do not have access to my books. I will do it in the New Year. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:33, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Only if you see fit! I'd be happy to help. Nick-D (talk) 07:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Milhistbot not running?
G'day Hawkeye, sorry to disturb you on holidays, but I think there might be a glitch with Milhistbot not running. Rupert passed Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Waterloo Bay massacre a day or so ago, but the bot hasn't done its thing as yet. Is it running less often with you away or something? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- The Bot stopped running. I have processed it with a special run. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:32, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- URLs that link to sections on Wikimedia wikis with non-Latin scripts have looked like this:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия#.D0.98.D1.81.D1.82.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.8F
instead ofhttps://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Википедия#История
. This has now been fixed on all wikis. Old links will still work. [234] - A new tag marks edits where a redirect was created or removed. This still works when the editor writes something else in the edit summary. You can see the tags for example in the recent changes feed, article history, user contributions or on your watchlist. [235]
- If you use Chrome on Android, you can now use the print to PDF button to create a PDF of an article. [236]
- Filter by number of edits or filter by time range have been grouped on a same menu on the recent changes page if you use the new filters. The "View new changes since $1" link is now more prominent. [237]
- Some of the web fonts that were provided by the Universal Language Selector extension are being removed. This is to reduce the load time on pages. The web fonts were added many years ago to help users read text in scripts which did not have fonts or had broken fonts. This is not the case any more. You can check the status page for a list of all web fonts and whether they are currently being used and especially for special requirements. [238]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 December. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 December. It will be on all wikis from 14 December (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 12 December at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 13 December at 16:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- You can discuss new or improved blocking tools with the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team. They will work on building better blocking tools. Leave comments on the talk page.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
- Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
- If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
- A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
- Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
- ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
- The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Your reversions
Hi Hawkeye,
I am attempting to categorize the notable members of the Century Association. There have been about 11,000 total. 1,700 already have been identified and categorized. This is a large endeavor that will help people to identify members and their professions, affiliations, etc. through cross-category searching, and will also help me to develop the Century's articles. If you doubt any person was a member, perhaps search their name here: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/006068741, at the yearbook for any date they were a member (especially, usually, the year of their death). As an example: Vannevar Bush (appears in every book from 1939 to 1962). That should give you some verification. Some of these yearbooks are not fully public online, and yet that text search should pretty much confirm. However, the publicly-accessible Century Association Archives Foundation has these books as well; you could verify there in-person as well (WP:OFFLINE). I could go there myself and take photos of book pages as well, if you wish. Is that okay for you? ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 03:32, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- Citations for Bush, Compton, Conant, and Pegram ca be found on pages 369, 372, 372, and 397, respectively.[1] How would you prefer to implement? ɱ (talk) · vbm · coi) 03:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ Commager, Henry Steele; Pringle, Henry F.; Burlingame, Roger (1947). The Century, 1847-1946. New York, New York: The Century Association. Retrieved December 12, 2017 – via Century Association Archives Foundation.
Further discussion takes place here: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_December_12#Category:Century_Association_members. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)- Never mind, I had overlooked that you already participated in that discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
S-50 (Manhattan Project) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the S-50 (Manhattan Project) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for January 22, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 22, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
WWII
FYI Talk pages discussions at World War Two have re-opened. You contributed relatively recently, so please chime in. -Chumchum7 (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Gen 75 Committee
On 18 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gen 75 Committee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ernest Bevin told the Gen 75 Committee that Britain should acquire atomic bombs "whatever it costs... We've got to have the bloody Union Jack flying on top of it"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gen 75 Committee. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gen 75 Committee), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
- Gallery: Wiki loving
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Tech News
- Because of the holidays the next issue of Tech News will be sent out on 8 January 2018.
Problems
- When you import a page from another wiki the usernames of the users who edited the article on the wiki you imported it from are shown in the article history. This should link to the users on the original wiki. A script to fix this caused problems for Wikidata and German Wikipedia. It also created a large number of SUL accounts on wikis where editors had never edited. [239]
- Some bot owners got email about their bots logging in from a new computer. If this is from one or a couple of wikis, you can turn these messages off in your preferences on those wikis until the problem has been solved. If not, you can report more about the problem in Phabricator.
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week. There will be no new MediaWiki version next week either.
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the Editing team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 19 December at 19:30 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Files on Commons will have structured metadata in the future. The developers are now looking for examples of different kinds of metadata to make sure they are aware of them when they build prototypes for structured data on Commons. You can read more and help by giving examples of interesting media files.
- The Structured Commons team are making sure Commons work with structured data. If you regularly contribute to Commons and Wikidata you can answer a survey that helps the team prioritise the tools that are important for the Commons and Wikidata communities. The survey ends on 22 December. You can read more on Commons. You can also help the team decide on better names for "captions" and "descriptions". This ends on 3 January 2018.
- The 2017 Community Wishlist Survey has now ended. You can see the results. They decide what the Community Tech team will work on next year.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rudolf Peierls
The article Rudolf Peierls you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rudolf Peierls for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of MAUD Committee
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MAUD Committee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Frisch–Peierls memorandum
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frisch–Peierls memorandum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:21, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Bot query
Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Golden jackal/archive1 wasn't closed by the bot, but not sure why. Sarastro (talk) 18:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- The Bot is looking for a {{FACClosed}} card on the review page, and cannot find one. I can't find one either. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, my mistake! For some reason, I never saved the page when I added the closed template. I'll either blame my computer or seasonal exhaustion. Whichever is less embarrassing. Sarastro (talk) 20:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Landings at Cape Torokina
G'day Hawkeye, I hope you are well. I am thinking about putting the Landings at Cape Torokina article up for GAN and was wondering if you would like to be a co-nominator. Depending on how the nom goes, I would also look to potentially put it up for A-class review in early 2018, as well. Please let me know what you think. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. No problem with that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:55, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Cheers, Hawkeye. The review page will eventually be here: Talk:Landings at Cape Torokina/GA1. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:12, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign
The article Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Template:WPMILHIST Announcements
G'day Hawkeye, just checking if Milhistbot is maintaining this template at present. I've manually removed some passed and failed GANs, but it doesn't seem to be adding new GANs either since about 9 December. I'm happy to add them manually while you're away if necessary. Let me know? Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:24, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like the announcements run needs to be run manually as well. I will ensure that it runs daily from now on. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign
The article Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Allied logistics in the Kokoda Track campaign for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
User group for Military Historians
Greetings,
"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you
The WikiProject Barnstar | ||
For your content contributions and ongoing tech support to the project in the form of Milhistbot I am pleased to personally award you with this barnstar and add you to my 2017 New Years Honours List. Thank you for your contributions to WikiProject Military History. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC) |
Hawkeye7, any chance you can return to your review of this Christmas hook and check the new ALT hooks? We're running out of time to get this onto the main page. Many thanks for anything you can do; I realize you're on vacation, but was hoping you'd be editing again soon based on your recent contributions. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- And to you and yours! I never knew you were from the North until now. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
Holiday barnstar | |
You deserve a holiday barnstar, but this barn flake was as close as I could come. And best holiday wishes to you. Thank you for making Wikipedia a better place. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC) |
Buzz Aldrin citations
Hey Hawkeye. I am close to getting Buzz Aldrin to a B-class article (nowhere near a GA though IMO), but I am having issues finding the awards he won during his military career. Do you have a good source for this? Kees08 (Talk) 06:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- His citations here. Then there's his own list. But it falls short... I have an awful feeling that the medal bar is based on File:Buzz Aldrin black and white dress uniform photo portrait.jpg. (There is a full list of these here). Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Your work on the astronauts has been very impressive. It would be nice to have at least the 1959, 1962 and 1963 ones all up to GA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, I had noticed those two sites but I was not sure if the first was reliable and if I could use the second because its a primary source. I suppose they are better than nothing, I will try to find a book source for the rest. I couldn't find anymore citations for his awards.
- Thanks! I have been working really hard on them, trying to get the first five or so classes to B. I do plan on getting them to GA, but life is pretty busy right now so I have not had time to sit down and work on them. I should start having time in a couple of weeks. Kees08 (Talk) 19:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Your work on the astronauts has been very impressive. It would be nice to have at least the 1959, 1962 and 1963 ones all up to GA. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Frisch–Peierls memorandum
The article Frisch–Peierls memorandum you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frisch–Peierls memorandum for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and All That
Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and best wishes in all things! Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 11:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Quebec Agreement
On 26 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Quebec Agreement, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that under terms of the Quebec Agreement, the United States had to seek British agreement to use nuclear weapons against Japan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Quebec Agreement. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Quebec Agreement), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 00:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nassau Agreement
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nassau Agreement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nassau Agreement
The article Nassau Agreement you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Nassau Agreement for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Nassau Agreement
The article Nassau Agreement you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nassau Agreement for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Rudolf Peierls
On 28 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rudolf Peierls, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rudolf Peierls was awarded the Medal of Freedom, but was later refused entry to the United States because he was suspected of being a spy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rudolf Peierls. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rudolf Peierls), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
DYK for British logistics in the Falklands War
On 29 December 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article British logistics in the Falklands War, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British logistics in the Falklands War depended on ships that were STUFT? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British logistics in the Falklands War. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, British logistics in the Falklands War), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
New Years new page backlog drive
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
- The total number of reviews completed for the month.
- The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)