User talk:SkoreKeep

Welcome!

Trying to reach very respected editor named ShoreKeep: I had participated in Wikipedia editing years ago only to be frustrated by the excessive rules and mysterious editors who deleted content that was properly cited on Wikipedia. Facts about military equipment that were cited on documentary television programs and from military officers mysteriously was removed by anonymous editors I traced back to the U.S. Navy at Coronado. There were other examples. I began to suspect that many topics of national interest were controlled by government interests and used for disinformation purposes. The discussion of Fukushima would be such a topic. I do not know if you are a disinformation specialist for sure, but in any case my information on Fukushima comes from National Geographic and other sources. I find the freak underground as you call it to be more reputable on some topics than Wikipedia. Are you going to throw the "tinfoil hat" label at me as well? That is a popular tactic used to attempt to discredit those with information not in line with the status quo. National Geographic ranked Fukushima as the biggest and worst nuclear accident in history, eclipsing Chernobyl. I have the article reference if you want. At this point, 6 years later, the total emission of dangerous radioactive isotopes exceeds Chernobyl by far, and it is still burning. I do not think you would disagree with that. I do not have time to commit to research on Wikipedia, only to have it mysteriously deleted months later. I find Wikipedia to be useful on many topics for light information, but not authoritative for anything. Sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.240.172.212 (talk) 02:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, SkoreKeep, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Tuvas 14:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Of Course:-)

I can see your new to Wikipedia, but any bit of useful information is, well, useful. Feel free to post as much as you can get about the Vikings probes. If your not as good writing such documents, feel free then to add what you can, post in talk pages, etc, and people will help format your text to be somewhat better. Welcome to Wikipedia! Tuvas 14:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Carbon dioxide

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Carbon dioxide, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 16:22, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm Subash.chandran007. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Operation Sunbeam, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -Subash Chandran ⁰⁰⁷ ׀ sign! 00:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SkoreKeep. You have new messages at WP:MCQ.
Message added 10:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ww2censor (talk) 10:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another reply and moved your post back up to the original discussion to keep it all together, so anyone reading has a complete view. There was no need to start a new discussion section; just continue to same one. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 12:44, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC SkoreKeep/sandbox was accepted

SkoreKeep/sandbox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear test tables

Hi!
I noticed your recently created articles on Soviet nuclear tests and went through them and fixed a few consistent typos (e.g. "Semiplatinsk" => "Semipalatinsk"). While doing so, I noticed that the table you're using could be improved a bit:

Put the table notes into a "note" group. This keeps them footnotes but distinguishes them from actual references.
Skip the "in Curies, with metric prefixes" bit in the venting notes. Units are given in the table, and it's always better to just add a conversion to SI.
"(and yes, they are all metric units)" feels a bit too informal for an encyclopedia. Something like "(all metric units)" should suffice.

I went ahead and implemented these changes in 1966 Soviet Nuclear Tests.
Cheers. Kolbasz (talk) 15:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Kolbasz. I've implemented your suggestions (and also corrected Semipalatinsk's misspell), and they should show up in the pages that haven't yet been done - I did 1967, -8, and -9 this afternoon. Regards, SkoreKeep (talk) 22:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		To SkoreKeep, for ensuring the quality of the article "Plutonium". Axl ¤ [Talk] 15:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join MILHIST

Hello, SkoreKeep, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, read the news, or find an open task. We hope you will join us! Anotherclown (talk) 04:27, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 05:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Sandstone

Nice additions to the article. If you could let me know where it is sourced from, that would be even better.

Also, I am still looking for reviewers for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Armed Forces Special Weapons Project/archive1.

Regards Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Atomic testing

Image	Name	Description
File:Barnstar-rutherfordatom.png	The Atomic Barnstar	The Atomic Barnstar is hereby presented to SkoreKeep for demonstrating a longterm commitment to accuracy and depth of coverage in the area of nuclear testing. Excellent work! Binksternet (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Fishbowl

I noticed that you've added the Line Islands to Johnston Island as being involved in the Operation Fishbowl nuclear tests. I don't understand the rationale for adding the Line Islands. All of the launches were done from Johnston Island. There were ships and aircraft involved from many areas across the Pacific, but I don't remember ever reading of any unusually significant involvement from the Line Islands.

On a related matter, the "location" of nuclear tests in the new tables causes consistent confusion about rocket launched tests when the launch points are stated in words, followed immediately by the coordinates of the detonation, without further explanation. This was a significant problem in the Soviet K Project article, and it is still a bit of a problem in the Operation Fishbowl article. It would leave the impression that Johnston Island moved around a few hundred miles during 1962.

I believe that there were 25 Soviet nuclear tests launched by rocket, and I can think of 11 United States nuclear tests launched by rocket (and one by balloon). In all of these cases, the location is going to be different, sometimes substantially, between the launch and detonation points. X5dna (talk) 11:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmmm. Somewhere I got the impression that Johnston Island was one of the Line Islands. Certainly have to fix that.

Fixed it. See Operation Dominic.

Yeah, I've been contemplating what to do about the rocket thing. The example that came first to mind was Swordfish, which was launched and exploded in open waters, 1200 miles apart. For the moment all I can say is that the lat/lon tags are always the explosions. I guess I've got to rethink how exactly the "wordy" descriptions happen, and what to do to make them work consistently, at least among rocket launches. I really need to highlight both the locations. Give me a few days to think on it, and I'll get back to the talk page for it.

Thanks for stirring up the bees here; I needed that!! SkoreKeep (talk) 11:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed that. See Soviet Project K nuclear tests. SkoreKeep (talk) 05:46, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Using capitals on Wikipedia

Hi, and thanks for your work. Could you please read WP:MOSCAP and correct your use of capitals? Thanks a lot. --John (talk) 22:20, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed the "Explosions" thing this morning and changed my template. I noted your other changes to the Soviet K project, and am making those changes as well. The next updates I'll be doing are the Soviet series, starting with 1949-51, so check that one out later today and back me up on it, if you will. Crossroads is a special deal, what with the featured article designation, so you're having done that is good. I won't be able to get back around to all the US pages again for a week or so (I just finished sweeping them this morning), but they'll get updated for this in due course. Thanks for the help. SkoreKeep (talk) 23:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

.

Speedy deletion nomination of Nuclear testing: India, Pakistan and North Korea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Nuclear testing: India, Pakistan and North Korea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. PamD 00:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Had I known how to go about it, I'd have deleted it myself. It is just a meaningless title now, and the talk page can go with it - nothing there of any use. SkoreKeep (talk) 01:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear testing

Deleted. Had I known that you wanted it to be deleted, I would have deleted it yesterday. Nyttend (talk) 12:58, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nuclear testing: proposed article moves

Hello SkoreKeep. I've opened a regular move discussion at Talk:Soviet Union's nuclear testing series. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EASTEREGG.

Hi there,

Don't worry: The EasterEgg concept is pretty easy to get the hang of. Basically, a link to "X" should be called "X". If it's called "Y", when the user gets to that tab, they may ask "Where did this article 'Y' come from? I don't remember clicking a link to 'Y'". And of course, they didn't; they clicked a link to "X".

The purpose of piped links is generally to alter syntax to match the surrounding sentence structure; they're not for giving a link a different name from the attached article.

InternetMeme (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

Hello SkoreKeep. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Subcritical nuclear tests".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Subcritical nuclear tests}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precession of perihelion

Thank you for your interest in editing articles related to planets. Please consider removing the perihelion precession information from planet infoboxes. All six orbital elements have complicated variations in time, and there is no obvious reason for singling out the argument of pericenter. In addition, the variations are very small and are applicable only at the current epoch, so the numbers as currently listed are somewhat distracting and misleading. If you feel that the numbers must be listed somewhere, consider adding a table to the apsidal precession article. Thank you. JeanLucMargot (talk) 16:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As you request. SkoreKeep (talk) 17:08, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Completed. SkoreKeep (talk) 17:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hansen reference

SkoreKeep - I've added a comment at Talk:Operation Hardtack I noting that I can't follow up the given Chuck Hansen reference. I see you initially added it in this edit [1]. Is it correct? Thank-you - Crosbie 19:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll go look it up. SkoreKeep (talk) 01:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Location of Nuclear Tests Tables in Articles

SkoreKeep - In the Operation Fishbowl and Soviet Project K nuclear tests articles, I moved the nuclear tests tables to a point after the text since, in those two articles, the tables are more of a summary of the article contents. Also, these two articles just have an improved visual appearance when the tables are moved to a point later in the article. X5dna (talk) 18:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's cool, I have no problems with that. SkoreKeep (talk) 19:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maintained template up for deletion

Hello, this is just a quick note to make you aware of the current deletion discussion for the {{Maintained}} talk page template which you have used on some article's talk pages. Cheers! Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 19:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maintained template changes

Hello. I've been going through the entire Category:Maintained articles listing to remove and/or clean up old {{Maintained}} templates. In doing so I saw your postings which had additional info on them. Of the several hundred I'd looked at, yours were the only ones with this info. So I assumed the data was non parameter stuff and I removed it. With apologies, I confess that your postings were correct. Still, I do not think the additional material is helpful. A reader/editor would have had to know that the template allowed for such added info. So, with this in mind, I've removed the instructions from the template documentation that allowed such data. I hope you will understand and accept my apologies. If you have ideas on how to improve the template, please post them. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 04:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Project Shoal missing from Operation Niblick

It appears that Project Shoal is missing Operation Niblick. Lil devil (talk) 23:15, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, you are correct. Fixed, and thank you. SkoreKeep (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hunt for the Antikythera Mechanism

Hi. You offered to create a companion article to the Antikythera mechanism, in which you would include all the sections that you deleted on 7 August 2014. ‎Among the sections you removed, I believe the sections "Similar devices in ancient literature" and "Documentaries, exhibitions and popular culture" should be restored to the original article. Americanplus (talk) 05:54, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. Unfortunately, other things caught up to me and I have been unable to do that. You certainly are more than welcome to build one up; I still have the text I deleted, but its also available through the archiving system. If you need help, let me know. SkoreKeep (talk) 20:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SkoreKeep. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Thank you for your correction of my phrase!

Hello! I'm a man who I appears to be a strange acts at Fukushima disaster cleanup. Thank you for your correction of my phrases in the most recent edition! The sentence that you corrected conjures a concrete images of the situation that the water was injected into the reactors, which then accumulated in the basement, more than my sentence. I accept your phrases gratefully. --I.hidekazu (talk) 12:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nader vs Cohen Debate on Plutonium Toxicity

Hi, SkoreKeep:

   You reverted my edit on plutinium toxicity. My edit was justified and I explained in the talk page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Plutonium#Cohen.27s_vs_Nader

   I am going to revert the page back unless you find mistake in my evidences. Bottom line, Cohen's calculation was way off.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverbach (talk • contribs) 00:24, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't argue the accuracy of your edit, but neither do I acknowledge it. I do not find an error in your analysis, but I've twice said I don't have the expertise to say it is either valid or flawed. It is incumbent on you to supply an authoritative reference for it. Until you do, it is only your word that the argument applies and does not have its own flaws. If you are an authority, then you need to cite a reference in your own work which anyone can look up. Bottom line, wikipedia will not be your soapbox. See WP:NOR for guidance. You've made the edits twice now; please counter my reasons for reverting rather than reiterating your changes. SkoreKeep (talk) 11:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SkoreKeep. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for British nuclear testing in the United States

On 18 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article British nuclear testing in the United States, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/British nuclear testing in the United States. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, ), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 05:53, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SkoreKeep. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards

Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for French Nuclear test events from 1992 to 1994

I might be missing it - but could you help me find this data? Thanks I love your research - terribly useful to place these events on the general history timeline. Marie Well — Preceding unsigned comment added by Googlewell (talk • contribs) 00:14, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marie, the French did not test any bombs between 7/15/1991 (Lycurgue) and 9/5/1995 (Téthys). That was the beginning of their last series, while others had stopped testing because of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Nothing to look at there. Thanks for the kind words. SkoreKeep (talk) 17:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog Banzai

In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Vela Flash: Forty Years Ago

National Security Archive's recent publication, Briefing Book #686, Published on Sep 22, 2019 and titled The Vela Flash: Forty Years Ago will be of interest to you. The briefing book includes recent document declassification. "CIA Saw Probability of a Nuclear Test as 90% Plus," "Additional Evidence Casts Doubts on White House Science Advisers’ Dismissal of Possibility of a Nuclear Test"

link: https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2019-09-22/vela-flash-forty-years-ago

I leave comment to you as an interested party on the mystery of the flash; apparently solved. I am currently topic banned from discussing weapons or editing weapons subjects (long story). Since there is now apparently only a 10% probability of the incident not being weapon test related, I feel that should not edit or comment on the subject further than this message. I hope this information helps our efforts to improve Wikipedia articles. Thank you, Johnvr4 (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, Johnvr4. I'll review all the evidence and the article in a bit I'm tied up with several other priorities at the moment, so it may be a couple of months before I can get to it, and I'll let you know what I think about it. Again, thanks. SkoreKeep (talk) 06:47, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phil Mason, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Base (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Radiation

What are the differences between the radiation article text and the diagram File:Alfa beta gamma radiation penetration.svg? Hyacinth (talk) 00:24, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually, the promise of a further discussion in the caption of the diagram is empty; I could find no further discussion in the article.

Note that the caption says "typical" a lot. What it means is "typical for nuclear decay", because these particles also arrive on the planet from cosmic radiation sources, whatever they are (there's no total agreement), and these pack a lot more energy than those released by decay and are therefore far more penetrating. The second thing to mention is that the alpha and beta particles can be substantially stopped as indicated but the gamma rays work on a different principle and are not completely stopped by any shield; their penetration is spoken of as halved (see [half-value layer]) by given thicknesses of shielding. Engineers react to that by overkill - they reduce the intensity of the gamma rays to a thousandth of their original strength and consider that sufficient. That takes ten "half-thicknesses" of the shielding material; a little over a mile of dry air, for example, or 2 meters of water, or .45 meter for concrete. Note the assumption of the average energy of the radiation.

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

1990 Soviet nuclear tests Left behind (aborted)

You say 30GK of explosives but New scientist and partially declassified US gov say 400Kg:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14619810-300-blast-wakes-ghosts-of-nuclear-past/

https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB200/19950630.pdf

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re Effects of nuclear explosions and P waves

I undid you revert and your somewhat misplaced "somewhat" on the earthquake section of this article, I also reworded it a bit, I added a new ref, I added further detail (unreferenced completely i.e. referenced a bit, needs one more), expanded to include all explosions not just underground testing... any comments??? Do not revert, also I would like you to try to justify your removal of P wave's for us both, thank you. The Original Filfi (talk) 10:25, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I get how a bomb explosion will only create a P wave, but as soon as it hits a discontinuity there will be sheer waves generated. You also cannot avoid the surface waves particularly in such a shallow event. Except for the missing sheer waves in the primary event, there is no difference between a bomb-caused shock and an earthquake. Or at least that is my understanding. Perhaps you know something I don't about the government's studies on bomb-caused shocks. My knowledge is straight sesimic science, somewhat dated. I appreciate youur expansion. SkoreKeep (talk) 12:52, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good reply, I think we are done here apart from a quick FYI, the difference is in the duration of the p wave production and detection, where an EQ even an apparent very small "jolt" may last at least ~50ms with peaks and troughs, an explosion occurs and ends in ~10ms in one large peak and no troughs.

As an aside was "youur expansion" a very dry joke?, maybe "youur expanssssion" more appropriate? lol, cheersThe Original Filfi (talk) 03:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]