User talk:HM2021

Welcome!

Hello, HM2021, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gleeanon409 (talk) 20:35, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ariana Grande as Glinda in Wicked.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ariana Grande as Glinda in Wicked.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --SnowPanda88 (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, HM2021. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Hamilton (2021 film), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 16:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Puccini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Puccini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Puccini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~SS49~ {talk} 04:48, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parade (musical)

Major productions should First be described in detail in the Productions section. If there was a West End production in 2011, please add a paragraph about it there, citing WP:Reliable sources for each fact stated, including the dates of opening and closing, number of performances, the name of the theatre, director, choreographer, notable designers, notable stars, any Olivier awards, what the reviewers said about the production, etc. After this, it can be added to the casting table and IB. Note that the Vault Theatre is NOT a West End theatre, and that production does NOT belong in the cast table. Thanks.-- Ssilvers (talk) 05:26, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Thomas and the Magic Railroad, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 01:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dear Evan Hansen (film) (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See the guidelines on future films. It does not appear that the film is notable to support a stand-alone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dear Evan Hansen (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dear Evan Hansen (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HM2021! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Evan Hansen

I've put a request for the current redirect for the page to be deleted so that the draft can be moved there. Rusted AutoParts 02:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leylakthefilm2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leylakthefilm2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunset Boulevard

Hey! Where did you see the cinematographer was announced for Sunset Boulevard [1]? I'm not seeing any articles confirming this. BOVINEBOY2008 17:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found out on my own, but because there are no articles, I changed it back.

Okay, good deal! BOVINEBOY2008 17:26, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of D'ILLUSION: The Houdini Musical

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on D'ILLUSION: The Houdini Musical requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 23:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JulianRDecker.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:JulianRDecker.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Matthew Puccini 2019.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Matthew Puccini 2019.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Andrew Barth Feldman 2018.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Andrew Barth Feldman 2018.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2017-PROM-KING-2010-Christopher-Schaap 2017.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:2017-PROM-KING-2010-Christopher-Schaap 2017.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:09, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michael Williams film director 2020.png

A tag has been placed on File:Michael Williams film director 2020.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MaxHechtman2019.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MaxHechtman2019.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying images from the Internet

You cannot upload images you find on the internet unless they have been made available under a free license acceptable to Wikipedia. Most images you find on the Internet are copyrighted. Continued upload of such images is a copyright violation and will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Whpq (talk) 18:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then is there anyone who can re-upload them by getting permission right now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HM2021 (talk • contribs)

You can request the copyright holders to grant permission. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. -- Whpq (talk) 20:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Woman in the Window (2020 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 20:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stories of Strength and Hope 2018 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stories of Strength and Hope 2018 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Real Steel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stories of Strength and Hope: Preventing Youth Suicide

The article Stories of Strength and Hope: Preventing Youth Suicide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable documentary. Winner of minor award, all citations are either about the award or the director. Nothing at all about the film, and zero reviews found in a WP:BEFORE. Redirect was removed by creator.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Wolf of Snow Hollow, you may be blocked from editing. BOVINEBOY2008 09:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stories of Strength and Hope 2018 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stories of Strength and Hope 2018 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bálint Varga

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bálint Varga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. /k8 19:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of D'illusion: The Houdini Musical

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on D'illusion: The Houdini Musical requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. /k8 19:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D'illusion: The Houdini Musical for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D'illusion: The Houdini Musical is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D'illusion: The Houdini Musical until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolma8 (talk) 21:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bálint Varga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bálint Varga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bálint Varga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolma8 (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Julian R. Decker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julian R. Decker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian R. Decker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolma8 (talk) 08:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThePromNetflixPoster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThePromNetflixPoster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Three Thousand Years of Longing. BOVINEBOY2008 19:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You MUST cite your sources when adding information that is not clear, i.e. credits for unreleased films. Even if it is accurate, we must do so due to WP:V. BOVINEBOY2008 01:16, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Puccini

Thanks for creating Matthew Puccini article. Can you please expand it to make sure it meets WP:GNG and WP:DIRECTOR? Thanks Kolma8 (talk) 18:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article expanded with info from the sources already cited in it that were not featured in the article along with new updates about his work.— Preceding unsigned comment added by HM2021 (talk • contribs)

Orphaned non-free image File:D'ILLUSION audiobook cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:D'ILLUSION audiobook cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hi HM2021! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Monty Python and the Holy Grail that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. It appears nearly all your edits are marked "Minor". There is an option, "Mark all edits as minor", which you may have turned on accidentally. If that's the case, I recommend you turn it off. Cheers! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 20:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prodigal Son (TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 19:01, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beth Malone, you may be blocked from editing. -Shift674-🌀^contribs 13:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HM2021! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 11:30, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Mess He Made 2017.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Mess He Made 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of New Line Cinema films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Access date

Hey! I noticed that you have been adding and updating Rotten Tomatoes scores[2] which is great. Make sure that when you do that, that you also add the access-date in the citation to match the date you accessed the source. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 12:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of My Nightmare Landlord

The article My Nightmare Landlord has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 20:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Manning (actor)

Hi. Your edit to Mike Manning (actor) was reverted, because the source you cited for the premiere of Manning's film, Slapface, makes no mention of that film or Manning. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 16:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your edit to Mike Manning (actor) was reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. As you may know by now, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you wish to restore that material, please do so only if you can accompany it with the required citations. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:00, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Mike Manning (actor). Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diana (2021 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana (2021 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana (2021 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 07:49, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Max Hechtman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Hechtman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Hechtman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 13:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One and the Same (film)

The article One and the Same (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, no reliable reviews found in a WP:BEFORE, nor was anything else found to help this pass WP:NFILM. All current citations are articles about its actors, distribution deals, and trailer...all run-of-the-mill promotional pieces.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Nightmare Landlord for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Nightmare Landlord is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Nightmare Landlord until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kolma8 (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On Draft:All Those Small Things. — Diannaa (talk) 15:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DelKab Elementary.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DelKab Elementary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights while copying and pasting

I removed a copy and paste plot description of Slapface from [[3]]. This is not the first time you have done this. Please read WP:COPYPASTE and WP:PLAGIARISM. Kolma8 (talk) 06:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edits_by_HM2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Black Kite (talk) 10:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:One and the Same 2021 film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:One and the Same 2021 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits...NOT

HM2021, I noticed that you mark ALL of your edits as minor, please read here WP:ME about what is considered a minor edit. Most of your edits are not minor. Specifically: What not to mark as minor changes:

Adding or removing content in an article
Adding or removing visible tags or other templates in an article
Adding or removing references / citations, external links, or categories in an article
Adding comments to a talk page or other discussion

It is very important to follow the community guidance on your contribution to WP. Thank you Kolma8 (talk) 11:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Blazing World 2021 poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Blazing World 2021 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leylak (film) (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leylak (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leylak (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:West-side-story-2021-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:West-side-story-2021-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Small comment

Please make it your best effort to properly cite sources by having a template, such as <ref>{{cite web|url=|title=|date=|first=|last=|website=|access-date=}}</ref>, to simply copy-and-paste, instead of just linking to a source per WP:CITINGSOURCES. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:My Nightmare Landlord poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:My Nightmare Landlord poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: All Those Small Things has been accepted

All Those Small Things, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced editing

Stating "Film's Editor confirmed" as your edit summary is not actually sourcing your edits. You must provide citation for something that is not common knowledge. IMDb cannot be used as a source. BOVINEBOY2008 11:21, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Babylon (2022 film). BOVINEBOY2008 19:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rebel Hearts Documentary Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rebel Hearts Documentary Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fear (upcoming film)

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fear (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CODA 2021 Sundance poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CODA 2021 Sundance poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Many Saints of Newark 2021 Teaser poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Many Saints of Newark 2021 Teaser poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fun Home (film)

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fun Home (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dear Evan Hansen (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and edits summaries

You are probably going to ignore this like most other notices I've put on your talk page. Please make sure you are providing sources for content that is not verifiable, such as (budget figures). Also, please provide a summary of your edits in the edit summary box. This is basic editing etiquette that you should know by now. BOVINEBOY2008 15:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Some Dude From North Carolina. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Distant (2022 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 01:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Days of Our Lives characters (2020s)

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Days of Our Lives characters (2020s), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:John and the hole xlg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John and the hole xlg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Tokyo Vice (TV series), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources.
Note: The content you added was not supported by the attached ref and the edit summary was not at all constructive. - wolf 12:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Prisoners of the Ghostland Teaser poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prisoners of the Ghostland Teaser poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:John and the hole xlg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John and the hole xlg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited You Will Be Found, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-bullying.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ignacyo Matynia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ignacyo Matynia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignacyo Matynia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 22:54, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:West-side-story-2021-teaser-poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:West-side-story-2021-teaser-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". You have already been told how to use minor edits properly by several other editors, and you are still continuing to mark all of your edits as minor even though they are not. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dear Evan Hansen (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You are even adding this unsupported content while marking all your edits as "minor", which is not appropriate. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please also review WP:CRYSTAL. Future events should be stated as being scheduled or expected, or if really certain to occur, then "set to be", because we cannot know the future. It is best to avoid the word "will". -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As editors keep reminding you, please do not add or change content, as you did at West Side Story (2021 film), without citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also, when you do add sources, please add the full citation, including the author, title, date or publication, and publisher/work or website, in addition to the url. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Headway (upcoming film)

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Headway (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney Chip 'n Dale film logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disney Chip 'n Dale film logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. clpo13_(talk) 05:31, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dear-evan-hansen film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dear-evan-hansen film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Spider-Man: No Way Home, you may be blocked from editing. WuTang94 (talk) 04:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Spider-Man No Way Home

What the Movie studios are saying is because of Spider-Man No Way Home, they don't believe movies they release in Monoscopic 2D will make any money. Nightmare Alley + The King's Man + Matrix Resurrections all release in Flat 2D Only, while Spider-Man N Way Home has made almost $900 million from 3D Screenings. This trend has been happening all year in 2021 starting Godzilla VS. Kong which made $500 million ($450 million from 3D Screenings), and continued with Black Widow and Jungle Cruise and Free Guy and Shang-Chi and Venom 2 and No Time To Die and Dune and Eternals, which all made 80% to 90% of their Global Box Office from 3D Screenings per movie. Even Domestic Box Office never saw less then 70% of screenings for a 3D movie coming from 3D Screenings. StarHakimi (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cats (2019 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Shoestringnomad (talk) 05:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at West Side Story (2021 film), you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned numerous times about adding uncited material. When you add information, you must cite it, even if every newspaper has what you're including on the frontcover. Shoestringnomad (talk) 05:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Reverie (Ben Platt album)

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reverie (Ben Platt album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Violet SXSW 2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Violet SXSW 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Guys and Dolls (upcoming film)

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guys and Dolls (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of American films of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walt Disney Studios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bare links

Why are you adding WP:BARELINKS to film articles when citing Rotten Tomatoes? Here's one example from last week. Please use the following template in your future edits: <ref>{{cite Rotten Tomatoes|type=|id=|title=|access-date=}}</ref> Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HM2021: Please take your time when citing sources in general. There is no rush. Example one and example two. Please use the following template: <ref>{{cite web|url=|title=|date=|first=|last=|website=|access-date=}}</ref> Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:25, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding correct information when creating infoboxes

Hello HM2021, I wanted to reach out to you regarding your recent edits to lists of accolades received by films. I've found two pages that you recently created and are largely responsible for – List of accolades received by West Side Story (2021 film) and List of accolades received by Belfast (film) – that both featured infoboxes that were largely incorrect. For instance, in the Belfast awards list, I had to update the infobox to read 32 wins/124 nominations (which is what the table shows) from 37 wins/217 nominations (which was wildly incorrect). Moreover, the infobox incorrectly included several organizations that were not included in the table, while simultaneously failing to mention organizations that were in the table.

Please note that while editors assume good faith in your work, edits like these can be considered disruptive. We appreciate your enthusiasm for editing, but if other people have to clean up your edits, that can quickly become frustrating. If you are looking for any advice, feel free to ask me here or at my talk page – we want to help you become a better editor and improve the project! RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:On the Count of Three Sundance 2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:On the Count of Three Sundance 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Award tables

Two things:

STOP copy-and-pasting lead sections when splitting articles.
SORT accolades tables by award, not date (see example).

Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Reverie (Ben Platt album)

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reverie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Your edit to Ariana DeBose has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Shoestringnomad (talk) 23:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New Boy 2007 Oscars.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New Boy 2007 Oscars.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dear Evan Hansen (soundtrack)

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dear Evan Hansen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Some Dude From North Carolina. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Samaritan (2022 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You also added unsourced claims to Till (film), Bad Trip (film), Cyrano (film), and Three Thousand Years of Longing. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at All the Old Knives, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 04:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WestSideStoryJets2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WestSideStoryJets2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BenProdufootOscars2022.png

A tag has been placed on File:BenProdufootOscars2022.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Rhain ☔ 01:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:On the Count of Three Sundance 2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:On the Count of Three Sundance 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1917 (2019 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Logan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit (fifth notice)

Hi HM2021! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 18:49, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Music Man and refs

Hi. Thanks for following up on your Music Man edits. Please remember to add citations when you add new facts to Wikipedia articles. All citations should include, at a minimum, the author's name, title of the article, publisher name or name of work (newspaper, magazine, etc.) and the date of publication, to the extent that the information is available. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Three Thousand Years of Longing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney Live Action Pinocchio logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disney Live Action Pinocchio logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kathleen Kennedy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:She Said 2022 film logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:She Said 2022 film logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barbarian (2022 film) (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:TOOSOON, I would recommend waiting for more information to come out closer towards release.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barbarian (2022 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Barbarian (2022 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SlySabre (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everything Everywhere All at Once, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniels.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:45, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sonic the Hedgehog (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:49, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fun Home (film)

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fun Home".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nope Soundtrack.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nope Soundtrack.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Matthew - (talk) 12:57, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CyranoSoundtrack.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CyranoSoundtrack.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of accolades received by Licorice Pizza

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of accolades received by Licorice Pizza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FabelmansSpielberglogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FabelmansSpielberglogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of accolades received by Licorice Pizza

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of accolades received by Licorice Pizza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Little Mermaid live-action remake logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Little Mermaid live-action remake logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Headway (upcoming film)

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Headway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Almost Famous, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Max Hechtman

Template:Max Hechtman has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DoubleCross (‡) 18:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hi HM2021! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at The Woman King that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Indagate (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HM2021! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. I see that you have received multiple notices about this in the past. TompaDompa (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Parade2023Broadway.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Parade2023Broadway.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disneylogo2022.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disneylogo2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Fabelmans, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Talk:The Fabelmans#Article issues to discuss further. There's no need to go back and forth in the article. Join the discussion. --GoneIn60 (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Your update to Prestige picture constitutes original research and so was reverted. Original research includes use of published sources in a way to advance a position that none of the sources explicitly say. Nowhere in the NPR article does it say that the nominated films’ losses are a direct result of low box office, release date, or their perception as Oscar bait, nor does it say that prestige fare was brought to an end simply because of EEAAO’s win. Spectrallights (talk) 14:39, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at The Little Mermaid (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. Mike Allen 00:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Gabriel LaBelle. — Archer1234 (t·c) 02:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at The Fabelmans. Sundayclose (talk) 03:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate use of "minor edit"

This is not a minor edit. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Inappropriately marking an edit as minor is deceptive and rude to other editors. Read Help:Minor edit for more information. Sundayclose (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MGM Leo the Lion logo 2021.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MGM Leo the Lion logo 2021.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fabelmans ILM Before and After.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fabelmans ILM Before and After.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 20:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Little Mermaid (2023 film) into Draft:The Little Mermaid (2023 film soundtrack). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:11, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Little Mermaid (2023 film) and other type edits

Please do not WP:SYNTH together reviews (that's not even sourced), like you did here. Please start following Wikipedia guidelines. Cleaning up after you for months has been a job in its self (these marketing sections you like to mass add, etc) and you never communicate either. Mike Allen 14:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Little Mermaid (2023 soundtrack) has been accepted

The Little Mermaid (2023 soundtrack), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 20:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Little Mermaid Soundtrack 2023.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Little Mermaid Soundtrack 2023.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --jonas (talk) 02:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Crater (film). What's On Disney is a FAN SITE BLOG and not allowed to be used anywhere in a Wikipedia article. We Got This Covered is also not allowed per WP:WEGOTTHISCOVERED. Mike Allen 02:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Pete Maverick a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Pete "Maverick" Mitchell. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ~Cheers, Ten Ton Parasol 18:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sammy Fabelman has been accepted

Sammy Fabelman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:50, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:1917 Schofield Run scene.webm listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1917 Schofield Run scene.webm, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. :3 F4U (they /it) 23:02, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:EyesofTammyFayeSoundtrack.jpeg

The file File:EyesofTammyFayeSoundtrack.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in The Eyes of Tammy Faye (2021 film)#Music. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Evan Hansen has been accepted

Evan Hansen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Before adding an awards banner to a film’s page, please be sure to verify that you are adding the template to the correct film. You added Hurricane Streets to Sundance Film Festival Audience Award: U.S. Documentary when it did not win that award. The correct film is Paul Monette: The Brink of Summer's End, which I have since fixed. Spectrallights (talk) 23:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fabelmans Theme by John Williams.mp3

Thank you for uploading File:Fabelmans Theme by John Williams.mp3. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 18:06, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:American International Pictures 2020.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American International Pictures 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: This Wish (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not quite enough independent, significant coverage listed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:This Wish and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I'm Just Ken.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I'm Just Ken.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitzi Fabelman (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This should remain a redirect as there is no significant coverage of the character to employ a stand-alone entry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mitzi Fabelman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Percy jackson and the olympians disney.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Percy jackson and the olympians disney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walt Disney Pictures Logo as of 2022.ogv listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walt Disney Pictures Logo as of 2022.ogv, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 00:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disneylogo2022.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disneylogo2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using bare URLs as references

Thanks for your contributions to Percy Jackson and the Olympians (TV series). In this edit seen here, you added bare URLs as references. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources if you are unsure on how to properly make citations. Thanks and 𝓜𝒆𝗿𝗿𝛄 𝓒𝒉𝗿𝖏𝙨𝙩𝒎𝝰𝙨 - Isaidnoway (talk) 15:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding original research on Little Women (2019 film)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Little Women (2019 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 15:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disneylogo2022.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disneylogo2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:LIIFE logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:LIIFE logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disneylogo2022.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disneylogo2022.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect citation on several articles about films which recently entered the public domain

I saw that the citation on Lights of New York (1928 film) for the film's public domain status referred to a page from 2019 talking about works from 1924, which did not mention the film the Wikipedia article is for. I replaced the citation with one that mentions the film, but I saw that you put the same citation on several articles about works that entered the public domain this year. Could you look into it an correct the mistake, if it is indeed a mistake? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.186.95.57 (talk) 17:34, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will correct some of them. HM2021 (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Oppenheimer (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Globe for Best Supporting Actor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nightmare before christmas 30th anniversary.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nightmare before christmas 30th anniversary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello! I'm 98Tigerius. Your recent edit(s) to the page Saltburn (film) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 98 𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 05:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Semi-autobiographical films

A tag has been placed on Category:Semi-autobiographical films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-autobiographical films

On the page you created, you defined the category as "film titles, for films that purport to tell the life story of an individual, but alters the events and changes the names of people and places to make the story more fictional." However, many of the films that would fit this description appear to have been placed by you in the category Autobiographical stories. For example, the introduction section of Almost Famous literally says "The film is semi-autobiographical." It would be autobiographical if the main character had the same name as the director, which he does not. There are multiple films in the Autobiographical category you erroneously listed as such.

Also, can you please properly format your references? You consistently use WP:BAREREFs, such as on The Holdovers and elsewhere, despite multiple requests from other editors to use the complete formatting. See WP:CITEWEB on how to do so. Spectrallights (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will send those that are semi-autobiographical films to the category page. Will remember to fill in references. HM2021 (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oscars 96 Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oscars 96 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial into Draft:E.T. (character). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFI Top 10 navbox

Thank you for putting that together (by the way, you may want to place it on the American Film Institute page), a very informative and easily comprehended navbox. Now, some editors may want to get rid of it, like they did the Sound and Sight poll navbox in a "vote" by three editors (in a deletion which should really be formally review-challenged, even months after the fact). Hopefully it won't be challenged or removed, but at least be aware of that Sound and Sight poll that seems closely related in relevancy. Thanks again, nice work! Randy Kryn (talk) 04:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wicked soundtrack

There seems to be a alot on the web about the release of the soundtrack(s) for Wicked coming out as two separate volumes (part one and part two). The information is also giving the list of the track sequences for each of the albums. This means that the list of the new songs not featured in the original stage soundtrack can be identified and listed in a new Soundtrack section for the production and development section of the article. Any thoughts? HenryRoan (talk) 02:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say yes. All the music of both parts was produced all at the same time but the soundtracks of both parts will be released separately. HM2021 (talk) 03:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the original playlist for the stage production: [4]. Here is the playlist for Volume 2 (though something better than the IMDB version might be needed) here: [5]. Here is the playlist from Volume 1 for the film version here: [6]. It looks like "Defying Gravity" does make it into Part One. I am still trying to learn about doing tables on Wikipedia and do not know how to implement it in that way in a new Soundtrack section; maybe you can help? HenryRoan (talk) 04:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your previous edit is being discussed on the Wicked Talk page. HenryRoan (talk) 00:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wicked Part 1 Poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wicked Part 1 Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: E.T. (character) has been accepted

E.T. (character), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page

I am working on a new page see Draft:List of removals from Disney+ abd wondering of you want to help P+T

Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 11:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:This Is the Thanks I Get?!

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:This Is the Thanks I Get?!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elliott Taylor (character) has been accepted

Elliott Taylor (character), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 07:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Adam Carter Rehmeier

Template:Adam Carter Rehmeier has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hugh Jackman as Valjean in Les Miserables 2012.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hugh Jackman as Valjean in Les Miserables 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, HM2021. Thank you for your work on Kiss of the Spider Woman (upcoming film). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:This Is the Thanks I Get?!

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "This Is the Thanks I Get?!".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitzi Fabelman (May 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TheTechie was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 00:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Beach Boys (film) (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Beach Boys (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2010 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everything Must Go.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ponyboy Curtis has been accepted

Ponyboy Curtis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waqar💬 13:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shucked (film)

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shucked (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shucked (film)

Hello, HM2021. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shucked".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will request to undelete it once it enters pre-production. Thanks! HM2021 (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Max Hechtman

I have received Draft:Max Hechtman. I am ready to accept it, but should alert you to my concern. Two previous biographies of Hechtman have been deleted. Your draft is an improvement on the deleted versions, but I think that it will probably be nominated for deletion again. I think that if it is nominated, it should be kept, but AFD can be unpredictable. I can accept the draft at this time, or I can decline it if you are planning to make more improvements to it. Please let me know how we should proceed. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw and was not expecting someone else to submit it to you. I am split on whether it should be accepted or not. On one hand, accepting it would be great as Hechtman, based on the sources, had his films play in festivals across the country and through that has achieved notability, and he was even notable in his own hometown when he was a teenager (his Bar Mitzvah project and being crowned Homecoming King in high school). On the other hand, I fear AFD could delete it again too, based on what they think defines "notability" and they could falsely think Hechtman has never achieved it. I do plan on making more improvements to the article whether this article submission is accepted or declined as more sources and info on Hechtman and anything related to him become found and if Hechtman himself appears in the news again in the days and months to come. His story is very interesting and definitely unique when it comes to the life of an emerging filmmaker (comes from Long Island, the only well-known alumni of FIT's Film and Media Program which started in 2014) and it does deserve to be told as long as Wikipedia allows it. If accepted, hopefully everything will be fine. If it gets nominated for deletion again by AFD, I'll request that it be dratified so it can still be worked on and hopefully it can be marked as a promising draft. HM2021 (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you plan to make improvements to the biography, then I will decline it so that you can improve it. I was aware that you did not submit it, and that it had been submitted by a user who has been blocked for disruptive editing, so I wanted to give you the choice. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:17, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just made the necessary small improvements by adding to his sources of inspiration and any additional material that I didn't get the chance to add yet before Jumpy submitted the article. I just resubmitted the article and it is ready for approval. HM2021 (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you ready for it to be nominated for deletion if I accept it? If so, I will accept it, but I am not saying that it will not be nominated for deletion. It almost certainly will be nominated for deletion. Are you ready to defend it (civilly)? Robert McClenon (talk) 06:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am ready. HM2021 (talk) 13:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Hechtman has been accepted

Max Hechtman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rotten Tomatoes "HOT" score

Please stop adding Rotten Tomatoes HOT audience score. This "new feature" doesn't change anything about WP:FILMAUDIENCE. If you disagree, gain consensus on WT:FILM, before doing mass edits to add this. Mike Allen 13:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gavin Michael Booth has been accepted

Gavin Michael Booth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 20:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"All my life, it's like I'm always just about to fall off the edge of the world's tallest building. I stopped falling the second I saw you." listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect All my life, it's like I'm always just about to fall off the edge of the world's tallest building. I stopped falling the second I saw you. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19 § All my life, it's like I'm always just about to fall off the edge of the world's tallest building. I stopped falling the second I saw you. until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mitzi Fabelman

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mitzi Fabelman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:This Wish

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:This Wish, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"When the horizon's at the bottom, it's interesting. When the horizon's at the top, it's interesting. When the horizon's in the middle, it's boring as shit!" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect When the horizon's at the bottom, it's interesting. When the horizon's at the top, it's interesting. When the horizon's in the middle, it's boring as shit! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 15 § When the horizon's at the bottom, it's interesting. When the horizon's at the top, it's interesting. When the horizon's in the middle, it's boring as shit! until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Blue Angels (film)

Hello, HM2021. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Blue Angels (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]