User talk:Giggy/Archive/July 2008

Video Game Project bot

I think I accidentally stopped your bot, as I was excited to respond to your offer. My apologies JohnnyMrNinja 09:40, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem - it wasn't running at the time so no harm done. giggy _(:O) 09:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I'll copy the discussion from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games for reference. JohnnyMrNinja 09:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

---

Just thought I'd hash it out here before going to bot requests, but what would people think of a bot that did the following:

• Added articles within certain categories like Category:2001 video games to without infoboxes Category:Articles needing a VG infobox or somesuch
• Added a {{vgproj}} to the talkpage of any article that was in a video game-related category, or had a vg infobox/stub template/etc.

Does this sound useful/feasible? JohnnyMrNinja 16:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

• If you're going to parse through on infoboxes, then you should also have the bot reformat the wikicode (won't affect the screen) as to have clean formatting for each parameter (line up equal signs). --MASEM 16:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

And perhaps make it so it changes all variations of {{vgproj}} and the infobox to a standard, consistent name? --.:Alex:. 16:45, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

{{WikiProject Video games}} please, I get annoyed that people keep changing the actual template link to one of the redirects. And I do hope that you don't reformat the infoboxen with wasteful space characters, I'd re-edit those right out of every article I touch. The code is not difficult to read. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 18:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree with Masem about the space characters. It doesn't really "cost" anything to have spaces, so I'm not sure what is being wasted, along the lines that WP is not paper and a few dozen bytes won't change the feasible article size, which is measured in thousand-byte units. The improvement in readability is well worth any perceived cost in wastefulness. If the fields become long enough, e.g. multiple release dates, multiple platforms, ref tags with URLs, etc. it makes a huge difference. The thing about the banner template is that I don't think anyone really enjoys typing out the whole name, which is why the redirects are more common. Although it is strange if they are going out of their way to change the template name as that is just extra work for no reason. However, I'd recommend that the canonical name be changed (shortened) so that people manually adding the banner will be more likely to use that instead of a redirect. Ham Pastrami (talk) 01:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

I agree with using space characters to line up the equal signs. Just because someone who has been on Wikipedia since 2007 has no problem with reading the code doesn't mean newcomers can't have problems. Editing articles should be as (new-)user-friendly as possible. Kariteh (talk) 09:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

---

Giggy, I think the first and most helpful task would be to add {{vgproj}} to the talk page (creating them if necessary) of any article within any vg-specific categories (similar to what you seem to be doing for WP:Australia). I've never really used the Infobox very much, so I'm not sure about how the formatting could be fixed. Thoughts? JohnnyMrNinja 09:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

The infobox thing I can't do with AWB (at least, I personally can't, but if someone was good enough with tech to do it with AWB I imagine they'd know a better language anyway). I can, though, do WikiProject tagging based on categories... I've gone through several of the VG cats before (distinct from these ;-)), but if you want to post (in userspace) any lists of categories to go through I'm happy to do so. Cheers, giggy _(:O) 09:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I've started User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgcats, which is just (most of) the top-level vg sub-cats. It'll probably be a couple of days until I can work more on it, but any interested party is more than welcome to add to it. JohnnyMrNinja 10:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Groovy, I'll start running them and mark them as they're parsed through. giggy _(:O) 10:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I've requested a change to the template itself here, that would allow us to create a single category with all VG categories included. I think that would make things a lot easier for regular maintenance. JohnnyMrNinja 10:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, don't they all fall under Category:Video games? giggy _(:O) 10:22, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes as subcats, but when things are properly sorted, subcats have their own subcats, and a category could belong to several other categories. There's no real hierarchy, so they pretty much go all over the place. One category that had every single VG category's talk page in it would be much more useful for maintenance . The template would have to be manually added to each one, but once that's done everything else gets easier. JohnnyMrNinja 10:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Good point and good idea. giggy _(:O) 10:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

What about finding articles with "video game", "computer game", or "arcade game" in the title? I don't know how to go about that, but there are probably articles out there that aren't in any appropriate vg category. JohnnyMrNinja 10:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

(<--) [1] is a good starting point, though I imagine there are much more efficient bot ways of doing it. WP:BOTREQ is the best place to ask (ie. it's over my head). giggy _(:O) 10:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Instructions have been requested. It is now well past bedtime, so I will take my leave. Thanks for your assistance! JohnnyMrNinja 11:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome! I'll keep running tonight and in the coming days... giggy _(:O) 11:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Would you be able to use something like this for tagging? JohnnyMrNinja 05:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

If you could get all the results of that list onto a page (with wikilinks) I could. giggy _(:O) 05:26, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Yay! User:Giggabot/Regex. giggy _(:O) 05:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

How on earth did you do that? JohnnyMrNinja 05:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Ask bjweeks :) giggy _(:O) 05:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Does this make sense to you? I'm clueless. JohnnyMrNinja 06:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

He used a script written in python (language), I believe. I don't know any more than that... giggy _(:O) 06:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

lol Yes, I got that far as well. I am well aware of Python, just as I am well aware of Farsi, and I know about as much. I was hoping there was some easy way, but there doesn't appear to be. JohnnyMrNinja 06:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

So I viewed the source in Firefox, copied it to Star Office, did some "find & replace"ing, and this is the result. It lists everything twice (which I couldn't see an easy way to fix). Is that a problem? JohnnyMrNinja 06:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Damn, that's awesome! I'm outta here soon now, but I'll try and run through that tomorrow (and listing twice isn't a problem - AWB can filter duplicates). giggy _(:O) 06:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

OK, now running this one (1943 pages). The others I shall get to! :) giggy _(:O) 01:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

OK, here's User:JohnnyMrNinja/Arcade game - Nintendo (arcade game & Nintendo). Later! JohnnyMrNinja 07:02, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

I decided to go crazy - User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgproj‎, User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgproj1‎, User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgproj2‎, User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgproj3, User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgproj4‎ - these should be every article that uses the {{vgproj}} or {{cvgproj}} redirects (at the time I did it). If you do these next, the rest should pretty be a lot simpler. JohnnyMrNinja 08:30, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Are these lists possibly too big? I can make them smaller. JohnnyMrNinja 05:17, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Nah, they're OK - was busy yesterday, but I'll try to run one today/now. giggy _(:O) 08:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

No pressure! I had just been a little worried, as I had to cut them down before Wikipedia would even take them in the first place. JohnnyMrNinja 02:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh dear that's a lot of edits. Do you want me to save the list pages for any reason once you've gone through them? JohnnyMrNinja 07:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

If you don't mind I'd rather keep them (at least, the one I ran today) as the bot's edit summaries point to them. giggy _(:O) 07:53, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Don't mind at all. BTW, this is wholly-automated, right? I would hate to think that you had to have an active part in so very many edits. JohnnyMrNinja 07:57, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Yep, being approved as an AWB bot gives you an autosave option. giggy _(:O) 08:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

(Yawn, tired, will not be running one tonight, but I'll try to get another page done over the weekend.) giggy _(:O) 08:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Busy with other stuff/unstable internet connection. Slowly getting there. —Giggy 08:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

It's been like 6 or 7000 edits so far? It is a huge undertaking, but that is awesome by any standards. Thanks again for doing this in the first place. JohnnyMrNinja 09:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I think it's doubled my bot's edit count. :-) —Giggy 09:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

WWE SmackDown (video game series) GAN

Hey Giggy; if you don't mind, could you give a second opinion on my review? The main problem is that the prose is quite shoddy throughout, although the article also has multiple issues relating to the level of detail given and lack of information in sources. I was quite close to failing it, although I'm not too confident with this. On the one hand, these problems could be remedied within the seven-day waiting period although, on the other hand, a GA could be written from scratch within this period. I tried to copyedit it, but there were too many issues for me to fix individually as the reviewer without me doing too much. Cheers. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 15:28, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

I've put it on hold, per User: GaryColemanFan. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 15:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Giggy, I've copyedited the article to help pull it through. Do you think I've done too much work on the actual article? Where is the line drawn? Cheers. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 19:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey Ashnard. As a general rule of thumb, if you consider yourself too close to the prose to be able to objectively judge it, you'll need to get someone else in. That's pretty subjective - I find that I'm usually more lax with this than other reviewers. Anyway, the review you did looks great, and I have no issues with your pass. —Giggy 08:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Giggy. It just got to the point where there was like 20 times where I could have said "no need for the comma", so it was easier to do it my self. Cheers. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 09:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Heh, I get that a lot. Someone once made a list of comma issues on a GA review, and it filled up an entire edit window! —Giggy 09:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Computer generated imagery review request

A rouge editor - I am suitably impressed. It's very early days, but would you please swing past and tell me if I'm on the right track - the Topics show where I'm planning to go. This is part of a broader effort to get more quality illustrators and 3D graphics artists interested and involved as per meta:Philip_Greenspun_illustration_project, but taking a different route. Dhatfield (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. :-) I've left some comments on its talk page. —Giggy 08:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Question about an image

Hey, I seem to recall seeing somewhere that you were an Admin over at Commons, so I thought I'd run this by you (if not, feel free to ignore it)...

I uploaded a picture (sorry, not sure how to link back and forth between different wikis properly) that I took over at Commons, for use on an article here. Would you mind taking a look at it, and letting me know if it's missing anything, or possibly has incorrect licensing, or anything? As I said, *I* took the picture, and I uploaded it, for use in the article Kirkwood (Amtrak station). (First image I've ever uploaded, so I wanted to check.) Anyway, thanks in advance for your help! umrguy42 23:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Yeah, I'm an admin over there (I left a note on your talk page if you need anything). The upload looks fine - I made some minor changes (diff) and it needs categories (info) but there are no major problems. Cheers —Giggy 08:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

SarekOfVulcan RFA

Thank you for !voting on my RfA. If you supported, I'll make sure your confidence is not misplaced; if you opposed, I'll take your criticism into account and try to adjust my behavior accordingly.

See you around the wiki!--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 01:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh... well, I opposed, but best of luck, and I'll call you up if anything happens. :-) —Giggy 08:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Ref. User:Giggabot/Regex

This appears to me to be the result of a search for all pages with "computer game" in the title, presumably with the intention of (eventually!) moving them all to "video game" so as to be consistent.

If so, there's one which you can now delete; Spellbound (Beyond computer game), as I've just now done the move for this page (your bot's Regex page was the last of the pages I was to edit to remove the redirect, but I've left it unedited). -- Korax1214 (talk) 08:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Korax. The intention wasn't renaming, but tagging for WikiProject Video games (like it did here). Thus, (as far as I can tell) there's nothing that needs to done on anyone's part - everything seems to be OK. Let me know if there are any issues I've missed. —Giggy 08:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Van Morrison

The editors working on this article (including myself) are going to nominate it for GA status. Would you be interested in copyediting it? I think it's well written but a pair of outside eyes would definitely help. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 03:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

No promises that it'll help much (I suck at copyediting) but I'll try to take a look. —Giggy 08:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah, my mistake. I saw your name on WP:PRV and assumed that you were interested in copyediting Arts articles. I realize now that the first section lists copyediting volunteers and subsequent sections list peer review volunteers. Would you rather I asked someone else to do the copyediting? --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 14:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Keeper76 is usually the first person I go to - he's really great at general copyediting. Others on that list are probably good too. I will try to take a look at some stage, though. :-) —Giggy 07:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Newsletter

Geez, I was going to do it earlier today, but I forgot. I'll have it ready in 24 hours. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Done! WesleyDodds (talk) 03:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Geez, talk about inefficiency. :-) Will be on its way soon. —Giggy 07:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

For you

I hereby award you a colorful fish!!, apparently Barnstars are "so last week" so here is the best alternative IMHO. Thank you for making my wiki experience that little bit nicer by nuking my "move" tab, Thank you. — Realist2 16:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

For you. :-) — Realist² (Who's Bad?) 16:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

He

Thank you

Thank you for the kindness you have shown to me in the worst time of my life. People like you make me see that we at Wikipedia re more than just simple anonymous contributers. When need be, we are a family. I will never forget your generosity of spirit. Jeffpw (talk) 16:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Email

Pinged right back. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 16:40, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

No Such Thing as Vampires

The article has gone under significant improvement since the last time you saw it. Please go here Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/No Such Thing as Vampires to leave more comments. Thanks. Corn.u.co.pia ♥ Disc.us.sion 17:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your !vote at my RFA

Thanks!

Thank you, Giggy, for your support !vote at my RFA. I will be doing my best to make sure that your confidence has not been misplaced. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 18:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Good luck - use them well. —Giggy 07:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

GAR for The Marrow of a Bone

Hey there! Just wondering if you could throw in any commentary on the GA review for The Marrow of a Bone article. Thanks for your initial advice too! It's helped a lot, and I hope my work has at least made some progression. --Jacob ^Talk 22:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, sure, sorry if I've taken my time a bit there... —Giggy 07:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

PR experiment

Dear Giggy, I'm writing in hopes of enlisting your aid in a four-month experiment at Peer Review (PR). The success of the experiment will depend on finding at least 10 editors willing to review at least one article a week through the end of October 2008. The experiment will employ a streamlined review process designed to insure that every nominator who seeks a review gets one and that reviewers do not waste time doing long reviews for nominators who do not respond to an initial short review.

The way it works is this: (1) Choose any article at Peer Review that lacks a review. Wikipedia:Peer reviews by date, especially the backlog list, is still a good place to find such articles. (2) Provide a short partial review based on your initial observations and wait to see if the nominator responds. Examples of short reviews can be found at Wikipedia:Peer review/Foreign relations of India/archive1 and Wikipedia:Peer review/Ed Stelmach/archive1. (3) If the nominator does not respond, the review is done. (4) If the nominator responds, continue the review as you see fit.

The experiment will require no noticeable administration. However, if you plan to participate, it would be helpful if you posted a brief note to Wikipedia talk:Peer review to that effect.

At the end of October, we can see how the experiment turned out and whether this process or some modification of it could sustain Peer Review permanently with minimal backlogs. If you can help, that would be great. If not, that's perfectly OK. We are all tremendously busy with a lot of different projects.

I have chosen to write to you in part because you've done peer reviews from the backlog during the past four months. Please forgive the form-letter nature of this note, which is more efficient than a personal note. With respect and thanks for your hard work on many projects, Finetooth (talk) 04:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

I try and do one as often as possible; I'll try and do one weekly. Thanks for taking the time out to work on this! —Giggy 07:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Brawl FAC

I'm going around and messaging any user who had discussed on the Smash Bros. taskforce (or in your case, just helping with all VG articles, including those within the Smash Bros. scope) and alerting them about Brawl's second attempt at the FAC. Any comments are appreciated, especially constructive criticism. I don't want the FAC to drag out so long that SandyGeorgia will be forced to close it before things could be properly fixed. So if you have time, please leave a comment. Thanks very much in advance! --haha169 (talk) 04:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Alternative music newsletter

The Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 15 - June 2008

"I've gotten into communication states with cats where I know I heard their voices in my head and we'd sit around and have conversations with each other. Like me and one cat there, one cat there and one cat there and I would sit there for like three hours talking to them before I realized 'I can't believe I've been talking to cats for three hours.'" - John Frusciante Project news "Under the Bridge" and Year Zero (album) reached featured article status in the past month! Well done to NSR77 and Drewcifer3000. List of Nine Inch Nails tours and the discographies of The Strokes, Faith No More, Pearl Jam, Echo & the Bunnymen and Death Cab for Cutie reached featured list status during the past month. Well done to Drewcifer3000, Indopug, Balthazar, -5-, JD554, and Teemu08. Wilco was featured on the Main Page on June 8. We collaborated on "Under the Bridge", Siouxsie & the Banshees, I Should Coco, Stone Temple Pilots, and MTV Unplugged in New York during the past month. During the month of June, Double Nickels on the Dime, Jeff Buckley, and "In Bloom" were promoted to good article status. This month's "Recommended Alternative Album" is Art Brut - Bang Bang Rock & Roll (2005).

New members Fvasconcellos and Alternative_Idiot joined the alternative music fold during June. Editors User:WesleyDodds

You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA Nomination

You have done such great work here with all of your featured content and good articles (as well as on the Commons) and because it has been nearly a year sense your first RfA I was wondering if you were ready to give it another go? Thanks and All the Best (I will create the nom page as soon as you tell me that your ready to stand for a RfA), --Mifter (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Wasn't there a recently controversial RFA about a month ago? Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Actually there was just an RFA quite recently that was so marred with drama that Giggy was forced to withdraw. That was while Giggy was Dihydrogen monoxide. I don't think Giggy will be running for quite some time. I'm an Editorofthewiki^{[citation needed]} 22:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid this looks to me like another of these "nominate X things for y" challenges that I had hoped the deletion of the Awards Centre might have put a stop to. Seems like nothing has changed. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 22:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Malleus Fatuorum, I am sorry if this appears to be a "nominate X things for y" nom to you, but I assure you that I am asking him if he wants to run for another RfA because I have seen some of his work on the Commons and here and I think that he could be trusted with the Sysop tools, not because he has written a lot of featured content. I apologize if it looks different but I am just doing this because I believe that he is trustworthy and could make good use of the tools as he has on the Commons. All the Best :),--Mifter (talk) 02:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

What does this proposal for nomination have to do with the awards center? How is that an apt analogy? Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 02:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, AGF plz? The Award Centre never had challenges involving adminship anyway. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 06:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

...other than the fact that 90% of participants would have serious challenges in getting >30% in an RfA any time soon. Daniel (talk) 09:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Then again, so would I! —Giggy 09:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure you had >30% :) Not to mention your RfA was one of the most farcical displays of community decision making I have seen since I started, so the result doesn't exactly reflect what it should have been. Daniel (talk) 09:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Heh. Regardless of motivations, I'm firmly not interested. :-) —Giggy 07:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

The only way that link in the box would become a blue link is if someone wrote a book called "Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Giggy 2". Er, not that anyone should do that. Nousernamesleft (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Tempting! —Giggy 08:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyedit/suggestions by tonight, OK? :) Daniel (talk) 06:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Yesthxbai. —Giggy 08:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Twilight Princess PR

I fixed your requests on the lead, could you take a further look (if you aren't busy, of course)? igordebraga ≠ 16:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure! Looks like the feedback given by others there should help you through FAC. —Giggy 08:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

MJ pictures/Commons

Hi Giggy, I left a message for you at your commons account regarding help I need with pictures for the Michael Jackson article here at wikipedia. Feel free to reply to the message here or over there. Cheers and I hope you enjoyed your fish.:-) — Realist² (Who's Bad?) 17:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Replied on Commons. —Giggy 08:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Co-nom

Sure, why not? Just keep it to a paragraph (3-5 sentences). Let's not go overboard. :) Yechiel (Shalom) Editor review 13:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

But going overboard is my thing. ;-) Working on it now. —Giggy 13:09, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Paul London GA Review

I responded to your concerns at the GA Review, here--SRX^--LatinoHeat 18:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

And I got the ones SRX missed. Leave me a message if there are other concerns you have. Oh, and I just wanted to thank you for doing the review. It's much appreciated! ;) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 20:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem - thanks for writing articles! —Giggy 08:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, man. I wasn't home much yesterday, and when I saw the review, it was already done. If there are any more problems, let me know. Cheers! -- iMatthew _T.C. 11:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Re to the concern about the ref at the GA review. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 15:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

WP: VG A-class

I want to activate a formal process for WP: VG's assessment department for rating A-classes. Similar to GAN, but it requires two volunteers to assess the article. They could be used like GAN, placed underneath requests on the assessment page:

• On hold: This article is currently awaiting improvements before pass/fail.
• Second opinion: This reviewer has passed this article, but requires second editor's assessment to promote this article to A-class.
• Review — This article is currently being reviewed (additional comments are welcome).
• Promoted This article has been promoted by User: Example and User: Example2.

An example could be like this:

1. Article - currently GA class, wish for A-class. --nom's sig
   1. Second opinion: This reviewer has passed this article, but requires second editor's assessment to promote this article to A-class. --assessor's sig
   2. On hold: This article is currently awaiting improvements before pass/fail. --2assessor's sig

We can make templates out of these, similar to {{GAReview}}. --haha169 (talk) 22:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey there. Nothing glaringly bad about the idea, but I'm probably not a good person to ask. 1) I'm pretty busy with GAN as is. 2) I think A-class is a waste of time. If you go ahead with it I won't stand in the way, obviously, so good luck! —Giggy 08:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. I've contacted a few other editors as well, but you were on the list as one of the more active WP:VG members, so I left a note for you as well! But if you can't help, its perfectly fine. I'll check on the others' responses, then. Good luck on your GAN! --haha169 (talk) 16:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

My "Not a barnstar of good humour"

Thanks! I thought my comment was quite funny, actually. :) In fact, I reckon it was almost as funny as this and this. :D Acalamari 15:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

*groans* - it's just so ironic! —Giggy 00:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Halo GA

Took care of most of the stuff, I left a comment about Salvatori you can see what you think. Thanks! Blackngold29 17:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

The Quarrymen

Done. --andreasegde (talk) 19:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

ping!

email (ooh, I feel like such a cabalist) – ırıdescent 19:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

It feels good to get pinged. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 20:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Cabalish reply ping. —Giggy 00:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 27	30 June 2008	About the Signpost

Private arbitration case criticized, vacated	Other ArbCom announcements reviewed in wake of controversy
Statistical model identifies potential RfA candidates	WikiWorld: "Mike Birbiglia and the Perils of Sleepwalking"
News and notes: Board votes released, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Sources in biology and medicine	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:DejaVuSample.ogg

Hi giggy. Do you know how to reduce the fidelity of this audio sample? Seems the reviewer is very strict on this matter that it made him "oppose" because of another issue regarding music video image. Regards, --Efe (talk) 13:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

I can't promise to do a good (or even moderate) job of it but I'll try and do something within 48 hours. —Giggy 08:23, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. The article was actually not promoted, FYI. --Efe (talk) 10:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)

Thanks for your participation in the discussion. I have responded to your concerns. Please reconsider your points.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for removing your opposition. Is there anything I can do to get your support.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Some more minor copyediting should do it - the prose wasn't quite there yet if I recall. I'll look again. —Giggy 06:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Tea & Sympathy‎

Giggy, I stand by comments last night, but re-reading the article again earlier I think with a bit of thought and reorganisation the article could be re-nomed in the near future. I'm happy now that it's comprehensive, and happy with the music section you added. And I think it meets 1-a. As I said, in areas its seems confused and threads often seem randomly merged in paras. A bit of chopping and changing, slicing and dicing, tlc and elbow greece,razzel and dazzel and your there. I've watchlisted the page and would be glad to help at any stage. Ceoil ^sláinte 20:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for your help with it. I wasn't sure if I'd have time to work on everything that it needed and didn't want to push a not-quite-ready article through FAC and waste everyone's time, so I'll just take it slow and get it done soon! Cheers - thanks for your help. —Giggy 06:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Happy Independence Day!

As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway!  :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 21:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

FPOC

Don't miss my comment above. Also, as a director at WP:FPOC, have you looked at Portal:Chicago during its candidacy?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I've been pretty inactive around FPOC lately but I just glanced and yours looks good, so I'll probably pass it at some stage today. —Giggy 06:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Radio (LL Cool J album)

The article underwent a copyedit. Can you take another look please? ---Dan56 July 5, 2008 13:35 (UTC)

Sure! —Giggy 06:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Hey Gig. I would ask this on email if I thought it was too sensitive, but seeing as how I don't have email, and I still wanna ask you something, I'll go ahead and ask you here. If you want this deleted, tell me, I'll do it with my superpowers without thinking twice and without looking back. Why are you opposing so often at RFA? I've seen you mostly in the oppose section, rarely in the neutral, and almost never in support. Are you acting bitter because of your most recent "activity" at hellweek?. I'm not about to challenge your views, but it seems to me, as a former coach of yours, and as a friend of yours (I presume), that you've gone very hardlined in regards to others good faith requests for the extra buttons. Am I in left field? (that's an American idiom meaning: Am I going crazy). What gives? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 02:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Is it because of my hellweek? I like to think not. Of the (4) current RfAs up I've supported 2 and opposed 1. But in a more long-term sense, I dunno. I could turn around ask why you're supporting so many people who I don't think will make good admins - that's probably the crux of it. Maybe I don't think they will because I'm grumpy, or stressed with the project, or whatever, but the fact of the matter is I'm opposing for the same reasons anyone should oppose - net (positive/negative). Does that make any sense? —Giggy 02:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and shouldn't you be on break? ;-) —Giggy 02:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

That's a good response, and honestly, I wasn't trying to call you out or anything. You are of course welcome to contribute to RFA anyway you'd like, it just seems to me that some of your opposes have been rather nit-picky lately (dear God, don't ask me for diffs, it's just a feeling). I almost always support, I freely admit it, because Wikipedia needs more admins, and Wikipedians need to stop being so dickish to themselves, read this for what I look for. Again, I didn't mean to call you out, just simply that I've seen you in the oppose section more often than I'm used to seeing. Do what you will though mate. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 02:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

See that's the thing (one of the things). I dunno if Wikipedia needs more admins anymore. (From my outsider's perspective) Vandalism isn't on the rise, and most of the bland (AIV/CSD/XfD) issues are relatively under control. We need better admins to deal with the shitstorms that aren't going away (ref. Any of the current ArbCom cases). If that means inadvertent higher standards, than shrug, I'll try to ease up a bit. —Giggy 02:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I've long wanted to write the essay WP:We need less admins. I agree with you. From my perspective a lot of the problems are too many admins rather than too few. I often see people say things like "Oh noes, 2,450,000 articles and only 1600 admins!" But this is an irrelevant ratio. The number of admin tasks does not grow with each article--in fact, from what I can see, no admin tasks are significantly backlogged (however, a great deal of article tasks are). The purpose of Wikipedia is to create a free encyclopedia. Yet whenever I venture to WT:RFA I come away with the impression that a lot of users think the purpose of Wikipedia is to make everyone an admin. --JayHenry (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

A better ratio is the number of admins to active users. In the WMF election, just over 9000 English Wikipedians qualified for voting; about 1200 of them were admins - roughly 13% of active users. I have a pile of articles on my watchlist that I first put there because they were regularly vandalised; they rarely pop up at all anymore, so I can say quite honestly that from my perspective vandalism is well down. And it should be WP:We need fewer admins. (I'm a great one to talk, having just got the bit less than two months ago!) Risker (talk) 15:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... I'd put it at WP:We need better admins as that's the crux of my argument. It's just that "better" narrows down the number of people we promote, thus we have less. But promoting less people just because we're cynical old bastards isn't the point - the point is that now we have plenty of people to delete "Paul is fat" articles we can afford to pick and choose who's going to resolve John and Bob's dispute over the reliable sourcing relating to Paul's fatness. I agree with Mailor Diablo here. —Giggy 15:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I'd agree. I rarely nominate people who I think would use the tools as an extension of exclusive anti-vandal work. Sure, its an important part of the work expected of an administrator, but they have to be flexible enough to take the strain of other demands given to them (example: explaining to editors why they protected a page which was being edit-warred on). I saw only recently an admin who couldn't even do this! Rudget (logs) 15:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Heh, yeah, you never know who they'll promote next! Imagine if they promoted that 300-supports guy, he'd have been a disaster! ;-) —Giggy 15:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, who was that guy? Hmm... Rudget (logs) 15:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Totally unrelated to the above discussion, but I think JayHenry would make a good admin. Discuss. ;-) —Giggy 15:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

<--too many colons...JayHenry's not an admin? (I mean that seriously). Also, thank you for your thoughts on this, and sorry for draggin' it onto your talkpage. Again, I have no diffs to support my gut feeling. You and I disagreed on a few candidates prior to DHMO#3. I agree with you (and Mailer D) that we need better admins. Just recently, I posted somewhere (dont' remember where) that 50% of admins need to be recalled. I might of been (British) pissed when I wrote it though, so weight that accordingly. To me though, good/bad admins has nothing really to do with RFA, or at least, not until RFA is reformed to vette out the best candidates instead of the milquetoast candidates. Anyone can keep their mouth shut for 3-6 months if they have a goal in mind. And then, KABLAMMO!!! within weeks. The good candidates are the ones that don't wear kid gloves, but instead are the ones willing to wrestle in the mud barehanded. But they get opposed by those they wrestled. And the cycle continues. I'm guilty personally of being an "admin candidate", after only 5 months of ridiculously mild editing, and passing easily because no one could find "any contentiousness". I don't have a solution though Gig, just problems. You should nom JayHenry. Excellent candidate from what I've seen of his contribs (limited). Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the nice words Keeper, but it's actually not a role that interests me. I think Archtransit is a red herring in these discussions. He spent six months making genuinely good contributions. It's not that he was milquetoast. In fact, he took arguably the most important passenger airplane to FA, did genuinely good work on it, and even got in a tiff with Sandy to preserve the formatting the way he wanted it. His DYKs were genuinely good too. He wasn't milquetoast. I don't think any possible system stops an Archtransit. --JayHenry (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah, point taken, JH. I agree that Arch made some very good article contrbs, (which helped him make his RFa an unopposed RFa (note: I didn't participate in it at all)). The fact that you can type "it's actually not a role that interests me" proves to me that you are an ideal candidate. I'm not a big fan of editors that only editor towards the "goal" of adminship. I only nominate/encourage those that seem to be here for the right reason, namely building and protecting the encyclopedia. Take a look through those I've nominated successfully to see what I mean. Whatever you end up doing, I'm convinced because of this convo that you would be an asset to en-wik if you were able to do the things that I'm able to do as an admin. To each his own though, not everyone is meant for adminship or desires it, or for that matter, would benefit from the "title"... Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Question relating to Silverchair discography

Since you seem to be the resident Australian-music expert round these parts, I thought I'd direct your attention to a problem that's recently been discovered (uncovered?) and get your opinion on it. It's been brought to my attention that Australian-charts.com is in the habit of deleting old chart-data. I took a look at Silverchair discography (since it was the only Australian-band FL discog I could think of), and checked out the Australian chart positions. Turns out that alot of the positions that were referenced on the discog page back when it was nominated are no longer available on australian-charts.com. This is very troubling, and I have the feeling it will affect alot of discogs and might stem beyond just Australian charts. I'm still trying to get a grasp on things, and would appreciate your input on the situation. Drewcifer (talk) 21:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Oooooo crap. (btw fixed link in your comment) Doesn't look good - seems not all the data there is backed up. I vaguely recall reading somewhere that the site only started collecting data from a certain date, but I have no idea the specifics or if it's even related to this site. Hmm... I'll look for a backup... keep me posted. —Giggy 06:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks alot for the adminship support. I dunno I've ready for that step just yet (and by ready I mean if I really want to bother), but if I ever do get around to giving it a shot, I'll be sure to let you and Wizardman know. As for the austrlian-charts fiasco, FYI, the german charts site does the same thing. But the good news is it looks like both sites have only deleted old album info, not singles info. I'll keep you posted. Drewcifer (talk) 23:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks mate. —Giggy 01:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I just became aware of your RfA as DhM

I'd just like to let you know that if you were to run again, I'd support you, and I would have challenge at least half of the opposers at your last RfA as completely without merit. Keep up the great encyclopedia-building, and perhaps at some point the RfA process will reform enough that a farce like what happened to you will not happen again. S. Dean Jameson 17:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

If the RfA process truely reforms, I'll request adminship again. That's how unlikely it is. But thanks for the kind words. —Giggy 01:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Román Baldorioty de Castro

I have worked with this article's GAN, updates or further commentary are welcome, cheers. - Caribbean~H.Q. 23:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey CHQ, I'll take another look. Cheers —Giggy 01:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

:(

I know it's a bit ironic in light of Keeper's thread above, but sorry about that one; I feel like my job description on WP at the moment is shooting down your candidates at RFA. It's nothing personal WRT you (or her, for that matter). – ırıdescent 23:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I suspect Keeper will be asking why you oppose so much soon... ;-) No word about that other issue you emailed over, unfortuneately. *shrugs* —Giggy 01:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Help

I see you do a bit of work on GA reviews. I was wondering whether you could help with Talk:Triarii. My reviewer and I are having a bit of a dispute, and I'd be grateful if you could take a look and provide a third opinion.--Serviam (talk) 23:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem, I'll take a read through and try to comment ASAP. —Giggy 01:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot :-)--Serviam (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Phoenix nom regional english issue

• Giggy, that phrase "he made a stuff up" (I gather an Aussie term?)... never heard it and on a quick reading it might read like "He made stuff up". suggest changing it to "made a mistake" or "an error in judgment" –xenocidic (talk) 02:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi Giggy. He made a stuff up in this RfA is awkward to an American English speaker. Suggest a rephrase of that part of your nom. Regards, Darkspots (talk) 02:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

"Fucked up" would suffice if you're looking for American English.--Koji†Dude ^(C) 03:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

We all fuck up sometimes--kudos to Giggy for trying to get this one sorted out. Darkspots (talk) 03:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

• You fellas really stuffed this one up, I already brought this to his attention! ;> –xenocidic (talk) 03:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, "new section" doesn't recognize edit conflicts. I write slow, what can I say. Darkspots (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

You just mentioned it, Darkspots made a whole NEW SECTION. Your comment got pwned.--Koji†Dude ^(C) 03:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about? Clearly my comment is the first one in this section! *whistles innocently* –xenocidic (talk) 03:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Now that was just pointy. :-/ --Koji†Dude ^(C) 03:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Xenocidic, the day you come up with a mouthful like "Phoenix nom regional english issue" as a section title on a user talk page...... Darkspots (talk) 03:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

zOMG drama! Sorry guys. "Stuff up" probably is an Aussie saying, but as Koji points, you could do worse than translate it to "fuck up". I changed it to "mistake" instead as somewhat more polite. ;-) —Giggy 07:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Hate to bother you

But would you be free to help with some needed copyediting on the Alleyway article by any chance?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 06:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing, mate. Gotta get that through its next FAC! —Giggy 07:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Red Phoinex

In the nomination for RFA for Red Phoinex, he has given you permission to re-do the RFA and nominate him. Are you going to nom. him tonite? America69 (talk) 02:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep, already done - needless to say I had been thinking about this prior :-) —Giggy 02:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, really? Wow, wish I had known that before taking Jean's nom. Oh well, guess that's in the past now. I still appreciate all you've done to help my RFA along. Red Phoenix ^{flame of life...protector of all...} 05:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Not thinking about it enough to tell you! Just, ya know, dwelling. And I type fast. ;-) —Giggy 07:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, absolutely you get two thumbs up from me for your actions on that RfA, Giggy. You acted quickly and decisively to minimize the undeserved harm to Red Phoenix's run for adminship. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 13:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

How am i harming anyone? I like him. JeanLatore (talk) 02:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Because you treated the nomination like you were doing a stand up routine. –xenocidic (talk) 02:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Replied at Irid and do you have time to do me a favour

Hi gig, I replied at Irids talk page regarding that picture policy thing. If you have time would you be interested in copy editing the Michael Jackson article? Its a mammoth job I appreciate but it is close to FA standard. It has been accused of sounding a little linear, timeline like. I was hoping you could spice it up a little? Since you have so many FA's and I have zero to my name you can probably help me out. I'm not sure my English is strong enough to drag such a complex subject through the FA battle field. On top of that the article is actually a very interesting read, there is never a dull moment in the life of Mr. Jackson after all. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 07:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

It would take me ages as I'm not a great copyeditor and don't have the best attention span, but yeah, I'll try. —Giggy 07:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, it is a big article, if you cant manage it all just try the career section. The bottom parts about finances, appearance, legacy erc are not so bad I think. cheers. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 08:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

You'll probably choke on your breakfast at my suggesting it, but you might want to ask Malleus. Whatever your opinion of him might be, he's a superb copy-editor. – ırıdescent 13:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Damn straight - much better than me! —Giggy 02:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Bloc Party

Firstly, thanks for your great copyediting here ;) But my question is: what do we do with the 404s? Their website was taken down the other day - presumably for a revamp - and most of the sources are now broken. Thoughts? weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 16:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Actually, they put the site back up, so it was just a case of relinking. Sorry to bother you. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 06:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

No worries. Generally I give it about a week and if it doesn't come back up, try http://web.archive.org —Giggy 06:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008 Newsletter

The July 2008 GAN Newsletter is ready for consumption. Enjoy! If you could use your little bot tool thing to send this to all of the participants, that would be excellent! Thanks! Dr. Cash (talk) 03:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep, I'll get right to it. —Giggy 06:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

FAC template

I finally found it! I couldn't figure out what stalled GimmeBot, and why the FAC category still included Talk:Tea & Sympathy. When you original added the fac template to the page, you did this, instead of adding {{fac}}, so it fooled the bot. How did you do that? Now I've removed it, and the articlehistory seems fine. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The {{fac}} template was substituted, but should not have. Ruslik (talk) 19:03, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, why on earth did I substitute? Sorry about that. —Giggy 06:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU, Status, and you!

As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible system) - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 23:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The traditional rfa thank you message

		Thank you for the support!
		Giggy/Archive, it is my honor to report that thanks in part to your support my third request for adminship passed (80/18/2). I appreciate the trust you and the WP community have in me, and I will endeovour to put my newly acquired mop and bucket to work for the community as a whole. Yours sincerly and respectfuly, TomStar81 (Talk) 02:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Great to see! Good luck —Giggy 06:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

UAA question...

Do you mind if I ask why you don't think the username User:Cheesefartlol is not offensive or disruptive? - Adolphus79 (talk) 10:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Noo... if you're reporting, you need to explain how it violates policy. "Clear violation of username policy" doesn't do that, since I find nothing offensive in the words "cheese", "fart", or "lol". —Giggy 10:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I personally don't either, but I thought it might offend some... eh... if you don't think it's offensive, no worries... - Adolphus79 (talk) 10:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Video Game Project bot

New section, the other one got archived - Just a note, Giggabot listed User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgproj in the summary of the most recent edits, and I think you meant User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgproj1. I don't know if it makes much of a difference, but I thought you might want to know. JohnnyMrNinja 20:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Note to self; be more careful. (Aww, our massive thread got archived :-(!!) —Giggy 06:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

If you haven't already seen it, there was a bot-tagging fiasco Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval#TinucherianBot, User talk:Tinucherian#WP:Food and Drink Tagging, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink#Poorly thought out tagging. My favorite article that got tagged for WP:FOOD was, I think, Guinea pig, but there are sooo many. JohnnyMrNinja 13:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I like to think I'm much more careful. ;-) (And yeah I saw it.) —Giggy 13:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Could the bot possibly be altered to not add the template to redirects, or to take it off redirects it comes across? JohnnyMrNinja 06:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Good point. Trying to think how I could do this with AWB. Not particulary sure if we're still going by the same lists. I think I'm gonna just go by the categories (User:JohnnyMrNinja/vgcats) next time I run (probs tomorrow). —Giggy 07:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

{{WP MMOG}} and {{WP MMO‎}} have been added to the redirect list. Also, does the bot check for more than one instance of the template on a page (perhaps the normal template and one from a redirected WP banner)? If not, that might be a useful thing to add. Sorry to keep piling it on :) JohnnyMrNinja 05:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

These are all of their pages User:JohnnyMrNinja/mmo. I'm getting better at making those. JohnnyMrNinja 05:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool, I'll add those templates to the checklist. user:Kingbotk/P, which I use, automatically checks for double uses, I believe. How are you (quickly) making these lists? —Giggy 06:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

What links here [2], showing only transclusions. Copy-and-paste into Star Office, find & replace "Talk:" with "[[", replace " (transclusion) (links)" with "]]". Not all that high-tech, but it works. JohnnyMrNinja 06:25, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Damn, good stuff. —Giggy 06:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Also, if anyone is ever interested, you can see "What links here" up to 500, but if you change the text in browser bar, you can bring it up to 5000. Then you can click "Next 5000". It made those previous lists much easier. JohnnyMrNinja 06:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Um... I didn't realize that the bot was going through all the subcategories as well. That's probably not a good idea, as Category:Lists of Star Wars characters, and Category:Lists of James Bond characters. As we have now gotten to template to properly sort Categories out automatically, I can generate a list of every single cat and sub-cat, and you can tag that list. Ideally, if the bot could go through all of the subcats of Category:Video games and Category:WikiProject Video games, and just tag the Categories themselves, I could then go through Category:Category-Class video game articles and un-tag the undesirable categories. I could then generate a list from that. Is that doable? Sorry that this keeps getting more complicated. JohnnyMrNinja 03:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (July 2008)

• Newsletter delivered by xenobot 03:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm being replaced ;-) —Giggy 06:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
    • lulz^. i replied (abruptly ;>) to your query at my talk. –xenocidic (talk) 12:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

My RFA criteria

Hello again. You stated here that you wanted to see changes I made to my admin criteria. Over a two week period, I thought carefully about what, exactly, I look for in an RFA candidate and then over another couple of weeks retooled my criteria page to become a better indication of that. I may make another couple of slight changes later on, but it's pretty much how I want it. You'll find that it still has some numbers sprinkled here and there, but since I'm left-brained, I had to leave some of them. Useight (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Heh. I don't think I have a brain on either side. ;-) Anyway it looks good. —Giggy 03:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: AtyndallBot

Just letting you know that the trail has concluded on AtyndallBot and your opinion in approving or rejecting the bot would be appreciated.  Atyndall93 | talk  03:39, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I've pinged some other BAG folks to look at it since I trialled it. —Giggy 03:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Poison GA

I managed to address the bits you brought up, and nail them all. Btw, I never thanked you for the copyedit and subsequent FA support for Alleyway, so many thanks Giggy.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 06:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

No worries :-) —Giggy 06:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

9.0: Live GA review

Took care of most issues, commented on others. Thanks! Blackngold29 07:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I took care of the rest. REZTER ^TALK ø 11:56, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Sound file

Hey, would you mind uploading a song file to Wikipedia like you did with "Under the Bridge"? I know I could just download Audacity but I have no clue how to use it. I'll email it to you. Thanks, man. NSR77 ^T_C 22:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

It's "Disintegration" by The Cure for the album Disintegration. Everytime I try to use Audacity the sound files are static. Is that because it's an MP4? NSR77 ^T_C 15:57, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Probably; I only use MP3 so I wouldn't know. I'll get yours uploaded asap. —Giggy 03:37, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again. NSR77 ^T_C 00:13, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Aimee Teegarden

Don't revert my edits on Aimee's page for the simple fact I know Aimee in real life since I am in Demolay don't delete what you think is not true.-- Zolo6 Talk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.180.23.240 (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

At Wikipedia, we work based on verifiable reliable sources. If you know the article's subject in real life you're welcome to suggest they add something to their website, for instance, stating what you wish to add to the article - that could work as a source (see this, though). Unfortuneately we do not accept your original research. Cheers, —Giggy 08:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you help me please??

Hi. Would you be able to help me? I was recently accused to be a sockpuppet, I responded to the charge appropriately (stating clearly that I am a separate person and not connected to any other members etc.) and defended myself against a list of specific charges against me. I have not seen any response to my statement as of yet. I am disturbed to see that I was added to a list for checking-user data eventhough I do not believe the evidence at hand validated such an action. No matter, I have also reviewed the results that have been returned on the check user report of myself and a few other people, and I was the only individual who did not yield evidence of being a 'sock'. Still, the reply of an administrator is listed which states that I am "most likely" the sockpuppet in spite of the results (or lack-of results to support any of the claims). I have still (!!!) had my contributions deleted or reverted by a bunch of other people asserting they were done by a sockpuppet. I restored my contributions and commented appropriately in the summaries but my edits have been repeatedly reverted. I am asking your help because from what I see you are the only person who has responded in a somewhat positive direction to the situation ( one of your contributions was to assert that others should assume my edits were of good-faith). Anyway I would be grateful if you might be able to look over my situation and help if you can, or if you can provide me with any assistance in my talk page etc. Thank You--JConoco (talk) 20:14, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi. My best advice to you is to state your case plainly and simply on the suspected sock puppets page and the request for checkuser page. I dunno why you've come here - if you could point to where I said that it'd help - but I did leave a note for the guy who's been reverting some of your edits at User talk:BlueAzure#User:James Conoco. Anyway, good luck. —Giggy 08:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the lengthy message i posted earlier, just was lookin for some assistance. I have actually found a wiki board member who will help me out. Thank you--JConoco (talk) 08:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)--JConoco (talk) 08:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Advice required

[3] Regards Giano (talk) 21:58, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Commented there. —Giggy 08:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

GA nomination categories

Hi. I just nominated Laie Hawaii Temple for GA, but I placed it under the nom. category of religion, mysticism and mythology. Should I move it to art and architecture instead? Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 11:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I would say so - it's first and foremost a building; that's my line of thinking, anyway. —Giggy 11:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I'll move it now. Viriditas (talk)

Sockpuppet

I don't know why James Conoco hasn't been blocked as a sockpuppet of a banned user, but my best guess is that it's due to the backlog situation at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Jvolkblum (13th). The sockpuppet status was confirmed at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jvolkblum back on 3 July. --Orlady (talk) 14:14, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

*nods* As I said, I don't really care either way, the advice given by me is fairly generic, I guess. Your explanation (backlog) makes a fair bit of sense, unfortunately. We need more and better admins in those areas. —Giggy 14:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

He's blocked now. --Orlady (talk) 22:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I wonder if Rudget is watching this page. :-) —Giggy 01:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

At this time of year, people in the northern hemisphere are liable to be distracted by real life. ;-) --Orlady (talk) 04:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep, good point. I replied to you on Commons, by the way. —Giggy 04:14, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Blue Dragon#Reception

The header says it all. Can you help me with the reception section plze! I give you a barnstar for it... King Rock (Gears of War) 14:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sure, I'll do what I can on it. —Giggy 14:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For helping me work on the pesky reception section of Blue Dragon. King Rock (Gears of War) 14:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

A comment or two?

Hi, Giggy. I always find your comments helpful, and as you can see here I need some feedback from someone. I really want to start working on that article, and if you could leave a comment on this, I'd be most appreciative. Thank you. The Prince (talk) 15:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Took me a while but I finally commented there. :-) —Giggy 15:47, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Thx

For closing my momentary lapse in judgment, here. I made the nom, saw SJ reply about refs, replied that "I don't see any refs", and then went to bed. Glad wikipedia still keeps articles that admins nominate incorrectly for deletion :-) I apologized to SJ as well, just wanted to say thanks for closing it "gently" on me :-) Keeper | 76 | what's in a name? 15:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

No worries mate :-) —Giggy 16:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Trump International Hotel and Tower (Chicago)

You earlier mentioned that you felt the prose needed some work. Another editor has made 100 edits on the article in the last 48 hours to copyedit it. Your reconsideration of your support would be appreciated.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

You've got my support - you've earnt it! —Giggy 16:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:Good article reassessment/Meher Baba/1

Could you revisit this article that you nominated. I think it has much improved and the issues you raised have been addressed. Geometry guy 20:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure. Thanks for keeping an eye on it - I think I got scared off when the page size started increasing exponetially. —Giggy 01:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

My RFA Thanks

Thank you for your support at my RFA, which closed as successful. And I'd also like to add my support to your comment that it really is nice to see our coach back at RFAs. I would also like to add further that it is really nice to see that you are still about here at WP. After your RFA, I wouldn't have been at all surprised to see you leave - the fact that you have stayed really does show your worth, and I wish you every success when you run for admin next time. StephenBuxton (talk) 21:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Just to say that if Giggy ever decided to walk across those red hot coals again (but not for a while yet I hope), then I too would be very unlikely to be appearing in the Oppose column. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 23:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

But what if I still use IRC? ;-) (Seriously, what's the point? I can do without the stress, and the reward is minimal if any.) —Giggy 01:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:

Yes it was.Electrical Experiment 01:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, you're approved. Ask around if you need help, and join #wikipedia-en-accounts on freenode for a live feed of requests. Abuse of the tool will have your access revoked, so take it easy. :-) —Giggy 01:45, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

I signed in but it say Admin needed. Electrical Experiment 01:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, there are currently no requests up other than those that have been deferred to admins. Take a look at Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators for help. —Giggy 01:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

So why under my user rights does account creator not show up?Electrical Experiment 02:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

That's separate from this tool; you need to show a need for it (it lets you create more than 6 accounts per day, I think), and then request it at WP:AN. —Giggy 02:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

ok i just want to make sure not having that right would not let me create a user under this tool. Electrical Experiment 02:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

curious,

how long does it usually take for new tasks to be approved at BRFA? am I supposed to put {{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} once the trials over, or? –xenocidic (talk) 03:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

First question: Depends how lazy BAG members are feeling. :-) Also depends on how quick the trial gets done.

Second question: Wait 24h and if nothing's happened, put that up. —Giggy 03:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

the lulz. yea it's been about 48 hours since the initial trial. so I guess I'll throw that up. –xenocidic (talk) 03:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

thanks. i'll try not to make any "stuff ups" =] –xenocidic (talk) 03:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

;-) —Giggy 03:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 28	7 July 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency
Wikimedia releases 2008-2009 Annual Plan	Defamation case against Wikimedia dismissed
WikiWorld: "Charles Lane"	News and notes: Adminbots, abuse filter, ArbCom, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, June
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:33, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Janet Jackson's Rhythm Nation 1814

I believe I addressed all of your concerns. I expanded the critical reception section to include the new review, but other than that I haven't come across any other reviews. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 13:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Awesome, will look again. —Giggy 02:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Over the Rainbow (Connie Talbot album)/GA1

I just took another look; I don't think he's finished. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 18:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

*nods* OK —Giggy 02:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: GA newsletter

Sorry about missing that. I guess this July 4th holiday is really messing me up this month. Oops. Anyway, with AWB, I'm usually able to pull up 'what links on page' for the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/participants, and then just remove the user pages so that AWB only posts to the talk pages. That should work fine. Dr. Cash (talk) 18:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Bleh, that doesn't work for me at the moment. I might need to upgrade (or downgrade), I don't know. I'll ask around and try to get it delivered at some stage. —Giggy 02:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Video game template redirects

Is there really a need to edit each talk page and change the redirect? I'm in the camp that says that redirects are cheap, it doesn't harm anything. hbdragon88 (talk) 00:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh dear - I thought those were just the occassional one. Looking now I realise how many times that happened. Anyway, the most recent batch shouldn't have been doing just that - I'll be more careful on the next one too. Sorry about that. —Giggy 02:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:VG talkpage

The talkpage froze up and I cant enter it. Do you know whats goin on? King Rock (Gears of War) 04:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

It's probably too long, still. I've given the archive system a bit of a nudge (now 5 days), maybe this'll help (in the long run). —Giggy 04:37, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool. King Rock (Gears of War) 04:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

FA album help

Hey, I'm working on my first album article that I hope I will get to FA, Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses). Since you've got a great deal of experience in album FAs, if you've got time, feel free to help out with it at the Peer Review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses)/archive1. I also plan to draw inspiration from Diorama (album) :) Gary King (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... my favourite album article (that I wrote) is Internationalist... Californication is one of the best articles out there, full stop, if you want something better to base off. ;-) (Will comment as I get time.) —Giggy 05:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Alright, I will also take a look at those, however I usually like to look at more recently promoted articles as they are usually updated to newer standards. In addition, I just noticed that you were the one that passed the article for GA three weeks ago :) Gary King (talk) 05:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I just noticed that too! You might want to (also) ask someone who hasn't seen it before. —Giggy 05:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Explanation

Upon re-reading, I see that WP:SNOW is only for unanimous actions. As soon as somebody objects to such an action, it should be undone. Therefore, I have restored the RFA of Shalon Yechiel. Sorry for any inconvenience. For the future, if you have concerns about my actions, please leave me a note. You'll find that I am quite easy to deal with. Jehochman ^Talk 05:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

No worries :-) —Giggy 05:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for rolling you back. That was just plain stupid. I should have noted the objection and restored the RFA immediately. Jehochman ^Talk 05:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured portals

They aren't receiving much attention as of late, do you have any ideas of what we could do? Rudget (logs) 16:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I could get more active for a start... ;-) (Commented on your talk too.) —Giggy 08:40, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

You got any ideas on how to change the main page to attract more attention to Portals. Right now it's on the top of the page but everyone just skips it and heads straight towards "Today's featured article" and "In the news" OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 04:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

The Main Page redesign thingo currently taking place should help. We need to try and get one that gives portals more prominence. —Giggy 04:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Only Featured portals, though. I've seen some of the non-featured ones, and, yikes. Gary King (talk) 04:13, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, though that can create issues of balance - not that many people would want to see Portal:Music of Australia compared to, say, Portal:Mathematics. Oh, crap, that's featured. Erm... Portal:Arts. Wow, that one really does suck. So yeah - a prominent link to featured portals, but I don't think we should just have those on the Main Page. —Giggy 04:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

How about a rotation of featured portals? Only it won't be updated per day. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

That's not a bad idea. —Giggy 22:17, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

List of voice actors in the Grand Theft Auto series

Hey Giggy - if you get a minute, would you mind going back to this FLC and offering a support/oppose? Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 06:45, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure - done. —Giggy 08:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Midtown Madness

Hey Giggy. I've just spent a while looking for sales data for this game, as it's the only thing that's stopping me from supporting. The only thing I found wasthis. It's a stupid question, but is there any way to get that sort of info on this game? Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 08:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much for taking a look; if you couldn't find anything and neither could I (I spent quite a while looking) then chances are it's not there in a reliable source. I don't know how to read the data on that list - did you see any actual sales data on it? If so searching for "Midtown Madness + (NUMBER OF SALES)" might find something in a reliable source, though it's unlikely I'd say. Google Groups is unreliable, I think.

That said, thanks heaps for all your work on this one! Let me know next time you're up for PR/FAC. —Giggy 08:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

That's really unfortunate because everything's there besides that and it's well written. I just personally have a policy not to support articles without sales info. Nevermind, it should do fine at FAC anyway looking at the quality. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 09:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I understand that personal policy - not one I hold but certainly a justifiable one. Again, thanks so much for your help on the article. —Giggy 09:59, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Review of suggested text at Talk:Linda_Darling-Hammond

Hey Giggy, I was hoping you could take a look at the revised, suggested text at Talk:Linda_Darling-Hammond, and give any suggestions you might have. As the topic has been one of (albeit slight) controversy, I'd like to get at least one other opinion on the proposed text before insertion. JDoorjam JDiscourse 18:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I will comment there. —Giggy 23:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

You did not support me directly, but I felt lots of sympathy and support from you. I did not enjoy watching that, but it was a wonderful experience: I feel so much more... oh well, words are at a loss. Thank you for your participation, and happy editing, Leonard^(Bloom) 19:14, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome, same to you. Good luck in the future, and don't worry too much about this; adminship isn't a big deal. (Really!) —Giggy 23:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

I think I'm well on my way to my second, too, if I can find some damned free images. So far I've found one good one from sometime in 1949, which just misses the January 1, 1949, cutoff for Canadian photographs to enter the public domain. Dammit. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 23:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

That one will enter PD next year, then? —Giggy 23:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Bot question

Would I need a new BRFA to have my bot do category work (depopulating) or could that be considered under the scope of task 2 (which was also find-replace work)? –xeno (talk) 00:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank you

		Thank you!
		Giggy/Archive, it is with deep awareness of the responsibility conferred by your trust that I am honored to report that in part to your support, my request for adminship passed (87/14/6). I deeply value the trust you and the Wikipedia community have in me, and I will embark on a new segment of my Wikipedia career by putting my new tools to work to benefit the entire community. My best to you, Happyme22 (talk) 03:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Mario Party 4 GA

Responded to all of the issues. Thanks, Giggy. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 17:53, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure, will take another look. —Giggy 09:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

MIT GA/R

I have made some substantial revisions to the MIT article in connection with its reassessment. I would encourage you to go and review the changes since your June 7 nomination. Madcoverboy (talk) 22:35, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure, will take another look. —Giggy 09:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 90 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral. All the best, Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 20:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Image Question

Per Iridescent, looping you in on this discussion. Can you weigh in? Thanks so much. TravellingCari 21:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Took me a while but I answered there. —Giggy 09:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! TravellingCari 14:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Lions (album) FAC

Hey, Giggy. Can I get you to take a look at Lions (album) again? Going for FA, but no one seems interested in reviewing it. —Zeagler (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sure, I noted that FAC but was hoping others would take a look too; I'll comment within 24 hours. —Giggy 23:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Yay

Thanks! I'm really happy to - we've also gone forward with our Featured Topic plans; they series is currently a candidate at WP:FTC. :) --haha169 (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I supported it there. —Giggy 23:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Commons

I know you're a commons admin - so is it just me or is there a problem there? All the commons images are showing up in text form instead of the image. --haha169 (talk) 18:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

nvm - it was fixed. I got kinda scared there, everything looks odd without images...--haha169 (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Erm... not sure what the problem is, but Commons occassionally gets buggy. I take it it fixed itself? —Giggy 23:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Long overdue

		The VG Barnstar
		The headline says it all. Generally for helping me out with the GAN mentoring, Melee FAC, and a load of other things at the video games project. This is for being an awesome Wikipedian!!! Ashnard Talk Contribs 19:38, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Aww, gee, thanks :-) —Giggy 23:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

You're nominating this guy? O.o

Please see my comment at User talk:Cla68#Admin. :) Yechiel (Shalom) 15:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

What can I say - I <3 drama! ;-) —Giggy 23:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow... a Cla RfA? I may have to break my streak in restraining myself from voting in RfA. Nousernamesleft (talk) 23:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I should try one of them RfA-diets at some stage. Might lower my drama-weight. —Giggy 04:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Flood

I replied on the FAC page. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 23:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC) ...and again. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 00:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Supported. —Giggy 04:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Ocean Rain review

I've made some comments regarding your review. Cheers --JD554 (talk) 13:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

User talk

Yeah, the image above Discuss Nicely got accidentally deleted. It was a famous Rembrandt painting (so obviously in the public domain!) but it didn't have the year specified and got deleted. Been debating whether or not to put up a different image. I keep thinking I'll redesign my user space at some point, but haven't had much time lately and I sorta like my trusty tabs. --JayHenry (talk) 08:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Shall I mention that one of your tabs is a redlink too? ;-) —Giggy 08:58, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

I keep that page deleted so people can't see the plans for the terrible Chimp-Human hybrid that I'm researching how to create! --JayHenry (talk) 09:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

It... all makes sense now? —Giggy 09:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, the image reappeared by the way ;-) —Giggy 05:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

FA thanks

	Thanks again for your comments - Forksville Covered Bridge made featured article today! Take care, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:06, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Congrats, you deserved it! —Giggy 05:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 20 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Addicted Romantic, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 10:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Huzzah, thanks! —Giggy 10:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Pictures

I replied at my page and left a further question at the Jackson FA review. — Realist² (Speak) 13:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Giggy, I have no further concerns at this point, and would be willing to mark my comments as resolved. But if you wanted to continue working with Realist on adding more critical commentary to the article, I'd be happy to wait until you're satisfied. I'm pretty sure I understand what you're asking for but I think this is Realist's first FAC, so he could probably use a bit more explanation, so that he knows exactly what to do on his future FACs. --JayHenry (talk) 15:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

It isn't my first FAC but it is certainly the first one that has a legitimate chance of success :-) Unfortunately I have great suspicions that some people will not support because of the subject matter and will instead remain silent (If they have no good reason to oppose). — Realist² (Speak) 16:02, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Jay: In terms of NFCC the article passes easily, so yeah, your comments are resolved and your work is done. :-)

Realist, I'll reply on the FAC. —Giggy 05:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I think I have doing the audio samples correctly know if you would like to take a peak, cheers. Also, what do you think of the article? :-) — Realist² (Speak) 16:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Looking much better, and looking great. I'm keeping an eye on the FAC and hopefully will be able to support some time soon. —Giggy 00:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, Wesley is giving it a bit of a trim now to add his seal of approval hopefully. — Realist² (Speak) 03:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Good Article Reviewer's Medal of Merit
		For your continued effort to exam, critique and promote articles according to the Good Article Criteria, I award you the Good Articles Medal of Merit. Thankyou for all of your hard work. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 12:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Aww, jee, thanks mate :-) —Giggy 00:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Concern

I addressed it. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 22:16, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I've indented my vote without prejudice. —Giggy 00:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Yup, regardless of the vote, it was an important point. Ler does a very good job at AOR. I personally had to re read it twice. Simple is better for me, NVS. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 01:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Howard Government is new ACOTF

Hi. You voted for Howard Government as an Australian collaboration. It has been selected, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks Matilda ^talk 01:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

hyphens and dashes

Thanks for your kind words, Giggy. Tony (talk) 11:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Conan FAC

Hi Giggy, I have answered your queries at Conan's FAC. Would you take a look and strike your questions if they are sufficiently addressed? Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 22:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I had assumed they were taken as resolved since I didn't say anything else. I'll leave a note to that affect. —Giggy 00:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Midtown Madness FA review

I suck for putting you off so long, but I have left a full review of the article on the FA page. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 07:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, you anything but suck - the timing was pretty good actually. Thanks heaps! —Giggy 08:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

That ping

Just out of curiosity, has anything formulated regarding the content of that email ping you sent me not too long ago? Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 09:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Nothing recently, no. One of the guys involved is on wikibreak which is slowing things up; I'd like to have it all ready to go within a month at most. —Giggy 10:00, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, just keep me apprised of the situation, mate. BTW, how do I get those GA icons to appears next to articles I've helped on my userpage? Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 10:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

You can copy paste my code from User:Giggy/Articles (at the top of the edit screen). If you like I'll code it in for you wherever you want it. —Giggy 10:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I see what you've done there, but I'm more interested in just having the small logo appears next to the few good articles I've help with, sort of like what I've done with Rush and the featured star. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 10:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I just remembered there's a template for that - here you go :-) —Giggy 10:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Ah, yes that's what I wanted. Thank you DMHO. Hopefully in the next few months, I'll do some more article work. Graduate School keeps me tied up, so my edits are gnomish and clearing back logs as a non-admin. I'm thinking of getting Phospholipase C to GA status, as well as Neil Peart to FA. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 10:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

DHMO... that brings back memories. :-) I still have Peart watchlisted though I'm a pretty crappy collaborator - I generally only pick up steam if someone else is doing something (prone to edit conflicting!) —Giggy 10:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Glad that I could be nostalgic for you : ) I recall our brief conversation about your helping me with Neil Peart. I still think that's doable. I suppose the biggest goal would more reliable references, and an expansion of certain sections. If you need me to get the ball rolling, I will. We can take it to the talk page if you'd like in the next day or so so start collaborating. If you have any advice for initiation, I'm all ears. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 10:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Whatever you feel is lacking is the first priority - ironing out the content is a pain in the butt when not all the content is there, so definitley get that done first. It seems pretty full at the moment, so if it's just adding sources, then you can get started by doing that. —Giggy 10:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Howard Government is new ACOTF

Hi. You voted for Howard Government for Australian Collaboration of the fortnight. It was selected on Sunday, so please help to improve it if you can. Thanks for your support. --Scott Davis ^Talk 13:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Lions (album) FAC

Hey, Giggy. Can you take another look at Lions (album) to see if I've addressed your concerns satisfactorily? I'd appreciate it. —Zeagler (talk) 14:25, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sure, will look again. —Giggy 00:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I've addressed your follow-up. Fingers crossed for a 'support'. ;) —Zeagler (talk) 00:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Show Your Hand article assessment

Thanks for taking a look at the article. I'm trying to address some of the issues you raised but aren't sure what you meant by "Refs should be placed on top of some punctuation such as a comma or period". Could you clarify please? Cheers Cavie78 (talk) 14:53, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

• He probably meant 'after' punctuation. References should come after punctuation. For example:

• "Blah blah I love cows and grass is green." is OK
• "Blah blah I love cows and grass is green." isn't

• Not sure why, really, but that's how things seem to be done. Best not to question it really. Naerii 15:01, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, what she said. —Giggy 00:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I've done a bit of work on the article to address your concerns, could you have another look please? Thanks Cavie78 (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Yep, I've replied there. —Giggy 23:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image in Frank Zappa article

Hi. Thanks for your input at the FAC nominations page for this article. You write that "Image:Zappa 16011977 01 300.jpg has no proof of GFDL permission." I am not an expert on this, but I can see that it was uploaded on commons under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license (and the author who I think put the picture in the article himself, forgot to credit himself - I have done that). Are images under such a license not allowed in FAs? Please drop me a note at your convenience. Regards, --HJensen, talk 14:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello; the problem with the image is that the source provided (http://www.helgeoveras.com/zappa.shtml) does not indicate that it is a GFDL image. We generally requst permission through the OTRS system in this case, though it's possible to assume good faith and let it go. Are you willing to contact the supposed copyright owner asking if it's a GFDL image? —Giggy 23:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I have contacted him directly and awaits an answer. Regards, --HJensen, talk 23:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. I'll try to take a look at the FAC prose some time soon. —Giggy 23:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello.

Hi. I've just submitted a list for the Number-one Latin albums of 1999 (U.S.), and in the peer review they asked to search for help for copyedit the lead section. Would you help me with that?, I took your name from the list, that's why I am asking you for help.

Thank you so much, Jaespinoza (talk) 19:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I'll try and do some work on that in the next 24 hours. —Giggy 23:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Help request

Here. User_talk:Blnguyen#Madonna_tour_sections You'll probably know more about the right formats. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Madonna tour sections

Could you please contact Alkclark (talk) who has been changing the Madonna tour sections and express your opinion. I would like the pages to be returned to the correct format, but I will not do so until this matter is settled. Thanks for your help. Please let me know when I can change them as I do not want to be accused of edit warring. JWAD (talk)

I'd rather not; you can contact him and point him to my opinion if you wish. (by the way, please sign with ~~~~ <-- that's 4 of them.) —Giggy 10:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Disasterpieces

I have made adjustments per your comments and left you some replies on your comments, check it out. REZTER ^TALK ø 12:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I have replied again. REZTER ^TALK ø 12:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I would like your input on this article again... it's still on hold and if the reviews are the only problem (and they need to be removed then please do so). REZTER ^TALK ø 02:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you help?

I want to try to get a pet project of mine, Robert F. Kennedy assassination up to FA, but have no idea where to begin with what to do to get it ready. As a prolific FA guy, can you help? Fritzpoll (talk) 23:19, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, of course! It looks pretty good at the moment. I think with some copyediting and minor MoS paying-of-attention, it could easily pass FAC. I'll try and leave some useful comments on the talk page asap; in the meantime if you can't copyedit it anymore because you're too close to its text, Keeper is a good person to ask. —Giggy 23:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Giggy - looking forward to the comments! Fritzpoll (talk) 23:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Keeper's a lazy sack, and he just tries to pass off any hard work onto his talk page stalkers, and they scurry whenever hard work is requested =) –xeno (talk) 23:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Are you volunteering to copyedit, Xeno? :-) —Giggy 23:41, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Responded to most of your comments by fixing them, but I've annotated your list, since there are some questions and things I may have misunderstood. Thanks very much for your comments though, they have defintiely improved the article Fritzpoll (talk) 13:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Questions about GA review

Hi Giggy, I saw that you recently gave my GA-nominated article Matthew West a GA review, and thanks a lot, I really appreciate it! I do have questions about a couple of the points you raised on the GA1 sub-page, and I've left comments there – specifically, the issues with italicization in ref publishers, and wikilinking dates. I appreciate your time, thanks! Jamie^☆S93 02:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for pinging me, I'll take another look there. —Giggy 06:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again for taking the time to review the article and pass it – and soon I'll see what I can do to help with reviewing a GAN or two. :-) Cheers, Jamie^☆S93 02:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Pondering

I've been thinking for a while we should collaborate on something, but I don't know what. Here's a list of bands I like; let me know if you think of anything. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I really liked Slient Alarm but what I've heard from the album after that has not been as engaging, yet still interesting (I don't like "I Still Remember" all that much, but there's something about the song that nags at the back of my head). I have done some work on American Idiot; really, all it needs is the reception filled out and the chart refs sorted and it could be ready for a GA nom. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

If yout want; it's up to you. I also have enough material to make a pretty good article out of the title track (this is why it's a good thing to check out features in guitar magazines). On another note I've been thinking of working on a U2 article for a bit, but haven't settled on any. Two I've been really thinking about are "With or Without You" and Achtung Baby. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you take care of setting up the newsletter with a new bot? Tasks outside of article editing confuse me. WesleyDodds (talk) 00:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I've about exhausted the reference material available about the recording. There's mroe to add about the music, but nothing too essential. Right now I think the most important aspect to tackle is sales figures and chart positions. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:54, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/SlimVirgin-Lar

A request for arbitration which you commented on has been opened, and is located here. Any evidence you wish to provide should be emailed directly to any sitting Arbitrator for circulation among the rest of the committee. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 14:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Image question for BLP

Hey Gig. There's a conversation on my talk page that has to do with the new article Al Madrigal, which was written by Ecoleetage. I'm in email contact with the subject himself, and I'd like to get a picture of him up (provided by Al himself). What will I need as far as copyright goes? Will a written statement from him over email suffice, and if so, what does that statement need to include? Thanks for any help - Tan ǀ 39 18:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

An email to OTRS (from him) explicitly stating he releases the image under [license of your choice] and that the image is his to license. Add a link to the OTRS ticket on the image page. Gigg- Oops, I mean Naerii 19:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

What Naerii said. Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission is useful; basically he needs to email you/OTRS with "I release <image name> under <license (preferably GFDL/CC-BY[-SA])>, and my name is Al Madrigal" (sent from an email address associated with him, eg. one listed on his website. —Giggy 23:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Newsletter note

Ok. Thanks for trying, though. It would've been nice not to have to press a button after each individual page,... If you still want to help contribute articles for the newsletter, or other content, please do. Cheers! Dr. Cash (talk) 03:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Death Cab for Cutie

Hey, you passed Death Cab for Cutie as GA back in May, so I'm wondering if you can review my comments at the talk and give the article a quick look and give your thoughts or at least let me know if I'm being totally artarded? Loving the userpage image, btw. Naerii 01:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I think (to some extent at least) the userpage image is pretty relevant to what's happened on that article! —Giggy 05:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

I also think Starlight (song) is a bit crap for a GA; in my efforts to expand Black Holes & Revelations I've come across a wealth of material that I'm sure could be used for it. I don't really know what you're meant to do when you find GAs that aren't all that good - I'm guessing just drop a talk page comment and hope someone fixes it? I'd do it myself but I can only commit to fixing up so many articles :( Naerii 03:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, well, that can be delisted. It shows I wrote it a year ago, hehehe. I'll try to make it suck less at some stage - I loved BH&R and will do what I can on that too. —Giggy 03:20, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to do a collaboration on Muse, specifically BH&R, and even more specifically, one of my favorite songs of all time, Supermassive Black Hole (song). Anyone? Gary King (talk) 03:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

A supermassive collaboration? ;-) I must try and do something on Death Cab, but yeah, I'm in! —Giggy 03:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Wow, that fell flat on its face didn't it?! :p I think I'd like to focus primarily on the album since we might not all like the song and the band's article is too ambitious for now. Gary King (talk) 03:26, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, now you want to collaborate? :P Totally up for it. I've got most sections expanded and filled in a bit. I think we just need to get the critical reception section expanded and the whole thing polished & preened. Also, there's no cites for the sales figures at the bottom, which is a shame as they're quite detailed. Naerii 03:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

← We could also wait until you are done and then do the album's singles? Gary King (talk) 03:29, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I had a good edit summary! —Giggy 03:30, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure, or that :) Starlight, Supermassive & Knights should be easy to expand, considering how insanely popular they are. There are a lot of comments on those individual tracks in the album reviews, too. Naerii 03:32, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay, someone ping me on my talk page when you're all ready then. Gary King (talk) 03:36, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Pinged. BH&R is up for GAN, so I'm happy to get started on the song article(s) of your choice whilst I wait for it to be reviewed. Starlight might be a good start as it just needs some expansion and filling out. Or we can go with Supermassive, I'm good with whatever :) Naerii 09:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Here's the play count of the album's singles from my iTunes: "Supermassive Black Hole" (431), "Starlight" (48), "Knights of Cydonia" (54), "Invincible" (0), "Map of the Problematique" (0). So now you have an idea of which one I like more :) Gary King (talk) 17:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Supermassive it is! The article is direly lacking in sources at the moment. I'll do some research and post a list to the talkpage there in a bit. Naerii 21:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay I will watch the article now and we can move the discussion to there. Gary King (talk) 21:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Me too. —Giggy 23:17, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay - I had work to do (the get-paid-for kind of work). I've begun editing there now. naerii 19:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:California

To avoid any conflict of interest, could you close/promote the above candidacy? Much appreciated. Rudget 12:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

May not have much time now, I'll do it first thing tomorrow. Cheers —Giggy 12:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Rudget 12:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Yay. :) Qst (talk) 12:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

 Done. —Giggy 22:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

removing date auto-formatting

Yep, it's the script you can now install using vastly simplified instructions on my talk page. Tony (talk) 13:21, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Excellent, thanks. —Giggy 22:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Mutiny of the Matoika

Thanks for taking the time to review Mutiny of the Matoika for GA status. I believe I have addressed the comments you made in your review. Pleas let me know if you have any other questions or comments about the article. Many thanks. — Bellhalla (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I shall take another look. —Giggy 22:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

RFK followup

Responded to most of your comments by fixing them, but I've annotated your list, since there are some questions and things I may have misunderstood. Thanks very much for your comments though, they have defintiely improved the article Fritzpoll (talk) 13:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for the ping (I noticed it but forgot to reply... and I see Mall has done some more work which is good). I'll reply there; it's pretty close to FAC I think. —Giggy 22:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Might take a look

Hello. Just wondering if you would mind taking a look at a collaborative effort I'm trying to start. Any feedback or ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! DxNate 22:30, 24 Jul 2008 User-Talk-Contribs

That sounds like a good idea! Not exactly my kind of thing, but good luck with it - something much needed. —Giggy 22:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

L. Patrick Gray GAN

Hi, I saw that you welcomed the user Graybooks, who was the original user to nominate L. Patrick Gray for GA. For whatever reason, that user does not seem to be too active on the page these days, but I have been, and have gone through a round of edits as suggested by Gary King. Gary failed the page for a minor issue that I have now fixed, but now does not seem to be interested in giving it another look since I've renominated it. Since you seem to be pretty active in the reviewing process for both GANs and FACs, would you mind taking a quick look at this article now that I've renominated it? I would welcome any of your comments. Thanks. (Morethan3words (talk) 03:54, 25 July 2008 (UTC))

Hi, since you renominated it, someone will get to it soon - I'll try to, but I can't promise I'll get it (or that it'll be done straight away). I think Gary did the right thing as it's usually good practice to get a new, different, reviewer. —Giggy 04:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Midtown Madness sales

Hey, I spent a while digging through articles I found on Access World News about Midtown Madness, and I could not find anything about sales. I'm rather convinced the information simply was not published. --Laser brain (talk) 06:26, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Yup, that's what I had suspected. Thanks for confirming, I guess. —Giggy 12:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Yertle the Turtle and Other Stories GAN

Hey Giggy,

Thanks for your review—the article kinda got lost after JimDunning left it. I'm just dropping you a line to let you know that I've fixed up the article some more, following your tips, and it's ready for a second glance whenever you're ready. Thanks! Mr. Absurd (talk) 06:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I've replied on its talk page. —Giggy 12:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Good Evening Giggy

How are you? I'd like to ask you something, but first I want to see if it's ok to post at your talk page. Beam 04:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure, go for it. —Giggy 04:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm a pretty good copy editor, I write advertisements that appear in newspapers as a second job, I was wondering if a copy editor is needed at either GAC or FAC? I'd love to help. Beam 04:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Good copyeditors are needed especially at FAC. Basically, if you can copyedit an article that's up for FAC, leave a note saying as such on its FAC discusion, and if it meets criteria, you can support too. SandyGeorgia "runs" FAC so you can talk to her for an introduction if you like. —Giggy 04:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, great! I'm trying to round out my contributions to WP. I think you've noticed my recent activity at AN and ANi. I think I'm actually helping there, and will continue to help in the future. I figure that my copyediting skill can be of use to WP, and I'm glad to hear that there is such an area where it potentially will! Beam 05:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I contacted her, we'll see anything happens as a result. Beam 21:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Can you check...?

I'm not good on image copyrights - was looking for the "iconic" RFK image, and found a copy here [4] - licensing infor is at the bottom of the page. Would you mind checking if it's suitable for uploading, since I've never dabbled in images, ever. Fritzpoll (talk) 20:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

• The license is cc-by-nd (no derivatives) and Wikipedia requires that derivatives be allowed (to be truly free). You could possibly use it under fair use,though. sorry for answering so many qs on your talk page giggy - utter boredom :( naerii 20:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • I'll have to see if a free copy is available elsewhere first. Thanks for the help, Naerii Fritzpoll (talk) 20:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
    • Ok, fair use it is. Never written the rationale before...will run and look it up Fritzpoll (talk) 21:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
      • Per Naerii. This rationale is excellent and there are no problems. Good luck at the FAC! —Giggy 06:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
        • Yeah, Vickser was very helpful. Thanks for all your help, Giggy. My hopes aren't especially high, but all feedback is good feedback from processes like this. Fritzpoll (talk) 09:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright

Hey, I was looking for an image on flickr for List of submissions for the 73rd Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film and found this. I'm a bit clueless on how I would go uploading and attributing this (do I simply pick the license and attribute the photo, or is there something else?), and as you're a Commons administrator and 'crat, I was wondering if you could help =) sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 23:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Never mind. That's the wrong awards ceremony, so not applicable :p sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 02:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh, well, that's embarassing...! Anyway in the case of that image it wouldn't be free, per this. See commons:COM:FLICKR for more information. —Giggy 06:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Lovin' the new image on your userpage

Anthøny has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Best regards, Anthøny 23:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

My only regret is that I didn't make it :-) —Giggy 06:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Midtown Madness FA review

I responded with honesty, please don't hurt me! --AeronPrometheus (talk) 08:49, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much! :-) —Giggy 08:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

As you're online

Do you think you could help me out at Commons [5]? naerii 11:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Replied back to you Naerii at Commons. --Kanonkas :  Talk  13:58, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I also replied to Naerii's reply there. —Giggy 00:02, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Need help with a particularly disruptive editor

Hi giggy, I can't be always monitoring on THIS GUY as it might come to a point where he would say that I am stalking or biting him (He claims to be newbie but yet acts like he knows everything here even though I join wikipedia later than him). Seriously, I would appreciate your help if you could bring this guy back in line as he has a tendency of using weasel words in quite a number of article's talk pages and provoke the ire of us, even when we tell him as nicely as possible not to (read his talk page). Thanks! (PS: whatever happened to your old nick?) --Dave1185 (talk) 19:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

• Sorry to trouble you, didn't know that you're not an Admin here even though you are on commons. Anyway, that user has now been blocked by Toddst1 after making a degrading racist remark in my talk page. Cheers! --Dave1185 (talk) 20:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

• Not a problem. Let me know if you ever need help with anything. —Giggy 00:02, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, Giggy!

I am grateful for your confidence: My RfA passed by a count of 64/3/3, so I am now an administrator! Of course, I plan to conduct my adminship in service of the community, so I believe the community has a right to revoke that privilege at any time. Thus, I will be open for recall under reasonable circumstances. If you have any advice, complaints, or concerns for me, please let me know. Thanks again! Okiefromokla questions? 21:28, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		In recognition of your fantistic article-work, I, Acalamari, award Giggy this barnstar. Ever since I encountered you, I have admired your excellent work, which has improved many pages and produced countless Good Articles. Keep it up...we're calling on Giggy! Acalamari 01:45, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Aww, geez.... :-) :-) —Giggy 01:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Plagarism?

Giggy do you see a similarity between [[6]] and [[7]] and would you consider it plagarism from wikipedia? User:KoziKaz 26 July 2008

I'm not Bearian. Try User talk:Bearian. —Giggy 02:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry Bout that fixed it. User:KoziKaz 26 July 2008

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 29	14 July 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency
WikiWorld: "Goregrind"	Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 30	21 July 2008	About the Signpost

WikiWorld: "Cartoon physics"	News and notes: New Board Chair, compromised accounts
Dispatches: History of the featured article process	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

unarchiving

You couldn't possibly have taken it to the other editors talk page? Only for the spirit of ending the matter. Synergy 09:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Umm... no. I'm entitled to continue a discussion where it's taking place without having someone try to arbitrarily end it midway through. If you dislike a discussion, you can 1) try to change the direction it's going in or alter the consensus, or 2) ignore it and wait for the archive bots. There is no logical reason to archive an ongoing discussion except when there are issues of copyright, libel, or privacy (and in such cases it should be collapsed, not just slapped with templates). Please don't. —Giggy 09:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

All of that was very much unneeded. Synergy 09:30, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

??? —Giggy 09:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm well aware of the alternatives. The conversation drew a large audience and nothing will come from it. I agreed with the crat at the bottom of the discussion, and I closed it to reflect it. No harm though. Synergy 09:36, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/L'Aquatique

I assume your neutral is no longer applicable because you opposed? I bring it up because Tangobot is flagging you as a duplicate voter. Thought you should know. :) Anyway, I'm off. Enigma ^message 09:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

RE Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/L'Aquatique, you first were neutral, then seem to have switched to oppose, but did not nullify your neutral stmt. It's getting picked up as a double vote. Please rectify. Thank you. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Ive taken care of it (if giggy wants to change it, he can do so when hes back online) for now. He can't obviously remain in the neutral section if he went to oppose, so I unindented the neutral. Synergy 11:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing. I'm opposed; I think this would have been obvious. —Giggy 03:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the commons talk, and the sandspit move. I try to remember to upload straight to commons now, not so good at moving the older uploads. If you haven't seen the fac tern comment yet, I've asked him to clarify in the summary, although its clear from the user page links that the user and website really are the same person. jimfbleak (talk) 12:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. I was leaning towards that assumption too, but wherever possible it's good to get confirmation. —Giggy 03:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, wich was successful with 73 support, 6 oppose, and 5 neutral. I'll try to be as clear as I can in my communication and to clear some of the admin backlog on images. If there is anything I can help you with, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page! Cheers, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 14:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Well done, and good luck. —Giggy 03:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:GO archiving broken

Please follow along at User_talk:Gimmetrow#WP:GO; I have long been the only person archiving that page, GimmeBot finally took it over (after a year-long search and much frustration from Raul), and now a wiki programming error has broken it. I'm considering no longer updating the page. If you don't mind, please keep responses at User talk:Gimmetrow, so we can keep the whole thing in one place. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Commented there. —Giggy 03:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

My RFA

Thanks for participating in my RFA. I will do my best to do what is right. If you see me do something incorrect, please tell me.

Cheers! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 21:02, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Well done, and good luck. —Giggy 03:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Small favour requested

Hi Giggy, I see that you've picked up the date delinker discussed on Tony1's page. I'm not going to pretend for a minute that I have the funniest notion how to work a monobook.js script (seriously, I am an old-fashioned, do-it-by-hand kind of person); however, I've just finished copy editing The Principal and the Pauper and there are a lot of dates in that one, particularly in citations. Any chance I could persuade you to run the script through that article and delink the dates? Thanks. Risker (talk) 04:16, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Ran the script; didn't pick up everything (those damn citation template accessdate thingos, for instance) but hopefully it helped. —Giggy 07:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Re : Responding to an old comment...

No problem! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 07:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I have clue ?

Can't think of any reason why not...and thank you for the fine compliments. I've thought about it occasionally, but been distracted by the form 27B/6ness. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

You like Terry Gilliam? Heck, the clue level keeps rising! I'll get to writing it. —Giggy 11:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Twelve Monkeys, Brazil and lots of python....simply wonderful. The man even has a rock !. Thanks for starting the papertrail off - Peripitus (Talk)

Worst comes to worst.... Kurt opposes. —Giggy 13:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Gee... Kurt opposes... stop the presses! ---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 14:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Random Commons image is shocked at the very thought! —Giggy 14:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

FA

I see that you review Featured Article Candidates; can you pre FAC review SummerSlam (2003). Previous wrestling article FACs failed because of unreliable sources and jargon. SummerSlam has no jargon and is written with a reception as well as with reliable sources. Thank You.--S_RX 15:10, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'll try to comment on the PR at some stage. —Giggy 23:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I responded to your first comments.--S_RX 17:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I would appreciate if you would check the article again, as I "majorly" (yea I know not a real word) improved it since the last time you reviewed it. Thank you.--S_RX 17:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Your comments at the RFK assassination FAC

Appreciate these - but looking at the article, I just can't see where to mention Bobby (2006 film) without giving it its own heading. That, and the fact that it is not intended to be a historically accurate account makes it problematic. Short of a one-off mention in the lead, which would not, in my opinion, be a good place for it to go, I can't see how to fit it in. ANy thoughts? Fritzpoll (talk) 17:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

A short mention in the lead ("... the events lead to a tribute film, Bobby]]...") would probably be OK. —Giggy 23:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

4X FAC

Thanks a lot for your comments at the 4X FAC discussion. I know I'm probably just being antsy / pushy, but any further feedback would be appreciated, let alone a !vote of support. Check in when you find a moment. Thanks! Randomran (talk) 18:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for pinging me again. I need to read through the rest; I'll try and do that today. —Giggy 23:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the thorough review of the prose. The more people copy-editing the better. Let me know if I've addressed all the issues, when you have a chance. Randomran (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Help mentor me through GA process?

Giggy, your name came up at User_talk:Keeper76#I_need_a_GA_mentor.2C_or_a_volunteer_PR.27er as an excellent person to seek out as a GA mentor. Would you be willing to help me through taking an existing article to GA? Details at the link to Keeper's talkpage. Thanks! Jclemens (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Giggy is an excellent choice. Go with the website, the Dobson article has a subtle but clear POV problem that will be very difficult to eradicate sufficiently for GA. BLPs are generally more difficult for someone new to the process. Good luck, Jclemens! Risker (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Heh. I was just about to say, I can't think of a "worse first" GA attempt then a controversial religious figure, a la Dobson. Whatever you think about him, the public (inthe US at least) has very polarized views of him and his convictions/stances, and his article history shows it. One of the criteria for a GA, if I'm not mistaken, is a "stable" article. Is J Dobson stable? Dunno. Keeper ǀ 76 22:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm very much of the same view. Avoid that Dobson article (or any other BLP) like the plague if you're trying for a first GA. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 22:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I know the POV stuff would be an issue, but I'm not one to shirk from a challenge. If you look at the history of James Dobson, I've done a good bit of work on it already. Ideally, I think it would be cool to get it to FA and put it on the front page when he dies. Actually, absent occasional vandalism, the article is remarkably stable for how controversial he is. But yeah--probably not a good first article, hence my willingness to work on something that a mentor specifies. Jclemens (talk) 22:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Featured articles are scheduled ahead of time, so don't let that influence you. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 22:54, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Whoever said I'm useful lied! :-) I've watchlisted the article and will happily help out where possible; there is still a section tagged for expansion that probably needs work before any thoughts of GA. —Giggy 23:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

You callin' me a liar??? I personally said you were useful! I plan on sending anyone here that, on WP:AN/K, asks me about either images or GA/FA, mostly because of how completely useless I am myself. :-). Hope you don't mind me indirectly spamming your talk, water. :-) Keeper ǀ 76 23:59, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

So, given that James Dobson is a contentious BLP, can you help me by taking a look at Whedonesque.com and providing suggestions on that talk page, too? Jclemens (talk) 02:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Keeper: Sure thing! I'd be happy to take advantage of your uselessness ;-)

Jclemens: I'm happy to take on a big scary BLP if you are, but I'd be happy to add some comments on the website article too. In fact, I'll do that now. —Giggy 03:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

RFA thank-you

Thank-you for your support of me at my recent RFA, which was successful. I have appreciated everyone's comments and encouragement there. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 03:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Help writing an image request

Hi Giggy, Over at WP:AN/K, anytime anyone has a photo question they're always advised to come here and ask you. So I decided to cut out the middle man and come here first. I've been working on the article Henry Conway and figured it could use a photo. I wasn't able to find anything close to freely licensed on Flickr, so I figured I should try writing up a request to his PR agent, who I was able to find online.[8] I've never requested a photo from an agent before, so I was wondering you could maybe take a quick look over my letter and see if it looks appropriate or if there's any way I can improve it. My current draft is available at User:Vickser/Sandbox, and you should feel free to edit it there or just comment here with how you think it should be changed. (I can also paste a copy here if you don't want to schlepp over there.) No worries if you're too busy and can't help out. I appreciate you at least considering the request. Thanks! Vickser (talk) 05:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I must tell the ANK folk to sort out their image problems themselves. :-) (Kidding!)

For the record; no freebies on Flickr.

You know what's ironic? I've never requested a photo from a subject before, either. (Well, actually, I emailed Powderfinger's fanmail email once (as it was the only one I could find) but never heard back from them.) Anyway, comments on your request... it currently misses the most important point, which (if you don't mind) I'll emphasise here. The email you get from them, and thus the email you forward to OTRS, must contain the phrase "I, copyright owner, license the attached image under <free license>". Without this, it's useless. Basically, the best thing to do in the email is put the words in their mouth - it makes everyone's life easier.

If you haven't already seen it, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission is great. User:R. Baley/Acquire a free image is also a good guide, while User:Videmus Omnia/Requesting free content is the cream of the crop, IMO. There's plenty of useful stuff out there, but of course if you need any more help, you're welcome to ask here and I'll do what I can. Cheers. —Giggy 09:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh! I'd read over the R. Baley and requesting copyright permission pages, but I hadn't run into the Videmus Omnia essay and it's absolutely perfect. Thank you so much for sharing that. I'd been having issues adapting the examples from Baley and WP:ERP to work for a letter to an agent. And good catch on noting that I should include that their email back must include the exact wording needed for OTRS. I'd avoided it because I didn't want to force them into a particular license, but reading over the Videmus examples it seems better to do it that way. I think I'll probably try for a CC-SA license since I think their license page is a bit more professional looking than the GDFL one. (I love GDFL and all, but the gnu's a bit goofy looking.)

Thank you very much for your help, Giggy! Vickser (talk) 10:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome! —Giggy 11:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

RfB Thank You spam

Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Free World, meet Rockin'

I don't know if it's ever been established that singles chart positions need to be included in an album article. I'm not opposed to you taking them out of American Idiot, since most every single off that album charted highly all over the known world, and documenting all the chart position on the album page would be a bit of a mess. WesleyDodds (talk) 10:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Start thinking about suggestions for the "Recommend alternative album" for next month! WesleyDodds (talk) 04:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Yup

I think you hit the nail on the head here. MastCell ^Talk 20:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

It sucks that no-one else is listening. —Giggy 23:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Nah, don't sell yourself short - 2 arbs have changed their opinions to "decline", apparently on the basis of statements like yours. MastCell ^Talk 18:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Well there ya' go. Good things happen while I sleep. —Giggy 01:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Bot boo-boo

The Giggabot has made a couple of weird errors: for example, it placed the VideoGames Wikiproject banner on Talk:List of characters in Casino Royale (1967). I believe it did something similar to another talk page related to either the 1967 or 2006 films, too. Weird. I'm afraid I mislaid the first example as I dismissed it as a one-off bot boo-boo but then it happened again today with a similar page so I thought I'd flag it for you. Cheers. 23skidoo (talk) 22:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, that would be because it was in Category:Lists of James Bond characters. I'll keep an eye on that. I haven't run it in a while though. —Giggy 23:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Email

Got your ping, visited the link, read through it, seems ok. Is there anything that you require from me? Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 04:33, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

I have no freaking clue at the moment. I think we'll know a bit more on 11 August. —Giggy 08:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, that makes two of us : ) Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 08:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey, me again

Sorry to bug ya Giggy, but I could use a copyedit for Poison (Final Fight). I wasn't going to dive more into the article until after I'd gotten Alleyway to FA, but with User:TTN poking at it looks like I need to bump it up the schedule a bit...

Anyway as always, thanks for your time.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey again... I GA reviewed that, I think, but I'll happily do what else I can on it. —Giggy

The prose is pretty good (doing what I can to help it). —Giggy 13:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Peer Review Request

Hey Giggy, I currently have the article The Great American Bash (2005) up for Peer review. I come to you in hopes of you reviewing the article, as I'm aiming to get this article prepared for Featured Article status. I would really appreciate if you would take some time and review this article to the best of your abilities. Cheers, -- iMatthew _T.C. 23:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey Matthew, I'll try and get some comments on there within 24 hours, if I can. —Giggy 01:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks man! -- iMatthew _T.C. 01:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Question

Hey Giggy; thanks for the GA review. You removed an IGN ref saying that it didn't contain the pertaining information in the review. That info is there, only that it's on the second page of the review. That left me wondering—are review sources usually split my the different pages of the review, or is the first page usually always used as the source for anything in the whole revie? Thanks, Giggy. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 09:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Heh. Interesting question, consider I screwed up in this case (please revert!). Generally I just point to the first page. Another option is to have a seperate references section and then cite it as "Author, year, page #", or something like that. Either way is fine. I just wasn't thinking and didn't notice the multiple pages. —Giggy 10:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I was starting to panic that I'd have to go through all my old GAs and then segregate the reviews off by page. Cheers, Giggy. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 10:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)