Talk:Mutiny of the Matoika/GA1

GA Review

So Mutiny is just a common name for the event, which technically wasn't a mutiny? The lead might need some clarification/expansion on what exactly happened (unless the limit of what happened is they commented angrily to the AOC).
- Added a little bit about not being a real mutiny to the lead. Does that read all right? — Bellhalla (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the Background section image should go in the top right corner instead.
- Moved. Since it's now a lead image, I set it to 300 pixels. — Bellhalla (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"The ship chosen, Princess Matoika..." - the way this is written would imply that you've already said something about another ship being chosen.... you haven't. Basically context is needed.
- The previous paragraph mentions the ship USAT Northern Pacific being declared unseaworthy by the U.S. Army. Does this need more context than that? — Bellhalla (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nah, it's OK now. —Giggy 23:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the stuff in the References sections should be in (relatively) small print (I haven't seen any article do that in that context).
- This was a spinoff article from USS Princess Matoika (ID-2290) which had a *long* list of references; I had chosen the smaller size for that article just to save space. I agree that here, the list of references isn't that long and doesn't really need the smaller size. — Bellhalla (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"the sprinters and hurdlers were provided only a 70-yard (64 m) cork track on which to practice" - should probably note that they run 100m at least in their races.
- good suggestion — Bellhalla (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
""everything possible to improve conditions"" - this quote needs a reference.
- added — Bellhalla (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And that's the lot - interesting read, so thanks for that! Please leave me a note when done with this. —Giggy 10:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Water tank photo

There is no linked photo. It’s either a broken link or mis-direction. ProulxMike (talk) 17:25, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]