Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by Gog the Mild via FACBot (talk) 19 November 2024 [1].
- Nominator(s): Fathoms Below (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
This article is about a virtual reality game released as part of the Five Nights at Freddy's franchise. Last year after I helped promote the original game to FA status, I've been curious on whether another FA could be made with this franchise. This game probably has the best chance overall. In summary, Help Wanted adapts the first five games in the series in an anthology format, while also including some new minigames. So let's see what we can do here. Fathoms Below (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Vacant0
[edit]Will review. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Add translated titles for Ref 1, 3, 6, 8, 26
- Change Ref 22 website to UploadVR
- Done second point, @Vacant0, is there a specific policy requiring the translation of the source titles? Just curious, because I'm not sure if that would be required. My previous FACs used a few non-English sources and I wasn't asked to translate the titles. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not aware of one, but I might be wrong. I know that there's a policy about foreign quotations, but not foreign titles. I was told to add translated titles at a GA review some time ago, so I've been doing it since then. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 18:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- I checked around at some pertinent policies and guidelines (WP:NOENG, and WP:FOOTQUOTE) and it seems like translating the titles into English is not required, though quotes not in English should be translated to English. I might ask around and see if translating the titles to English is preferable or if they should be kept as-is. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine then. I do not see it is an issue that should bar the article from becoming FA. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- I checked around at some pertinent policies and guidelines (WP:NOENG, and WP:FOOTQUOTE) and it seems like translating the titles into English is not required, though quotes not in English should be translated to English. I might ask around and see if translating the titles to English is preferable or if they should be kept as-is. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
The prose is relatively short so I'll go through and read, and leave any recommendations if I spot any. If the article does not receive a source check, you can ping me and I'll do that too. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- "
Help Wanted is a virtual reality survival horror game
" – It's up to you, but I'd change Help Wanted to Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted.
- Done
- Optionally wikilink virtual reality (it's already wikilinked in the lede, so why not do it in the body too?)
- Done
- Add (VR) as the abbreviation of virtual reality in the same first sentence.
- Done
- Jump scare is wikilinked twice. Remove the second wikilink.
- Done
- Possibly explain the warped graphics element.
- The reviewer says "distorted visuals" and there isn't much that I could find that went into detail on the graphics.
- Who published the game?
- Scott Cawthon via his company ScottGames. I'll add that to the infobox
I'll look at the lede and reception tomorrow.- There's not too much information about the sequel, so per WP:VGLAYOUT it can stay where it is right now under the Reception section.
- Lede: The downloadable content called Curse of Dreadbear.
- reworded
- Reception:
- I personally feel like the wording could be slightly improved.
- A lot of the sources weren't in English and it was hard to summarize their thoughts. This section was the one that I thought might need some extra eyes
- I'll have a deeper look in the next few days and leave some comments that could improve the section. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the sources weren't in English and it was hard to summarize their thoughts. This section was the one that I thought might need some extra eyes
- "UploadVR called it a worthy adaptation or the franchise's games" I assume this is a typo.
- Done
- IGN Italy should be italicised.
- Done
- "the power of the jumpscares"?
- Should I change it to "effectiveness"?
- Yes, that sounds better. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Should I change it to "effectiveness"?
- "
Some reviewers called the jumpscares effective, but said that they would become repetitive over time
" – remove said
- "
- Done
- Optionally move "The game was nominated for the Coney Island Dreamland Award for Best AR/VR Game at the New York Game Awards in 2020." to the first paragraph.
- Done
- Do we have reception for the sequel?
- Metacritic lists only one review for the sequel from UploadVR. Should I include it?
- Sure, why not. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- I couldn't find a great way to integrate the review to be honest. Is there a way you think I should add it somehow. Say something like "UploadVR called the game ___ and ___?" Just curious, I just want to make sure that I'm doing this right.
- Sure, why not. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Metacritic lists only one review for the sequel from UploadVR. Should I include it?
Vacant09, a few replies above. Fathoms Below (talk) 22:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
I'll go paragraph by paragraph.
- The first paragraph does not have any issues.
- Second paragraph:
- What do you mean by an "accessible" entry?
- Easy to get into, especially for people unfamiliar to the franchise
- "Destructoid felt that it would appease longtime fans and people unfamiliar with the series,[2] and The Games Machine said that it would appeal to players who were not fans of horror media through its simple mechanics" → "
Destructoid saw that longtime fans and those unfamiliar with the series would be appeased with the game, while The Games Machine wrote that players previously not fans of the horror genre would be appeased because of its simple mechanics
"
- "Destructoid felt that it would appease longtime fans and people unfamiliar with the series,[2] and The Games Machine said that it would appeal to players who were not fans of horror media through its simple mechanics" → "
- Reworded a little to be more in line with the source. Does this work?
- "worthy adaptation"?
- Decided to add a quote from the article instead. Does this look better?
- "IGN Italy said that it was" – change to present tense
- Done
- Third paragraph:
- "UploadVR said the atmosphere was intriguing and increased the power of the jumpscares, writing that the virtual reality made the game feel immersive" → "
UploadVR said the game's atmosphere was intriguing and increased the power of jumpscares, and that virtual reality made the game feel immersive
"
- "UploadVR said the atmosphere was intriguing and increased the power of the jumpscares, writing that the virtual reality made the game feel immersive" → "
- Reworded. Does this work?
- effective, in what sense?
- Effective at scaring the player
- Fourth paragraph:
- I doubt that "the" is needed before "different minigames".
- Reworded
- "The Games Machine called the levels diverse"?
- This was a tricky one, but I reworded it. Does the new version make sense? I think I got it more in line with what the reviewer was saying.
- Yes, it sounds better. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- This was a tricky one, but I reworded it. Does the new version make sense? I think I got it more in line with what the reviewer was saying.
Support Thanks for addressing my comments. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 20:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Support from NegativeMP1
[edit]I've done work on every other game in the Five Nights at Freddy's series and conducted several source searches for this article before this FAC at the request of the nom (hell, we nearly co-nom'd), while also reading through it countless times. So knowing the subject matter and what all is out there, I firmly believe that this article clearly meets the FA criteria (though I did choose to wait for Vacant to finish his review before I supported), and I hope that this passes. λ NegativeMP1 07:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Source review
[edit]For clarification, I am looking at this copy of the article for my source review. My comments are below:
- Nintendo Life should be linked in Citation 4. Even though it is a redirect, it would be helpful for readers. I'd also encourage you to link IGN Italia in Citation 6 rather than separating the website out by only linking IGN as the redirect would be more beneficial to readers.
- Done
- Is there a reason why Citation 18 uses GamesRadar rather than GamesRadar+?
- Changed as suggested
- Destructoid is not linked in Citation 21 even though it seems that the website/publisher is linked in every citation, such as Metacritic being linked in both Citations 24 and 25. Destructoid should be linked in Citation 21 to keep everything consistent with the formatting.
- Done
- Titles for non-English citations need a translation. I am seeing this with Citations 1, 3, 6, 8, and 26, but all of the citations should be double-checked to make sure that this is fully addressed.
- Translated all the titles I think
- Apologies for not being clearer with this one. The original title should be included alongside a translation. You would use the |trans-title= parameter in the citation for that. Just to be clear, the citation should have the original non-English title alongside the English translation (i.e. it should not be a replacement of one for the other). Aoba47 (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Translated all the titles I think
- It may be helpful to link European Spanish in the relevant citations. It may just be me, but I have never heard of this phrasing before, and while I obviously get it from context, it may be helpful for readers to have some avenue to look into it further.
- Done
- You can disregard this one as I do not think such linking works with how the template is set up. Aoba47 (talk) 23:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Done
- Shouldn't the "Sequel" subsection briefly cover the reviews/critical consensus for the sequel?
- There sadly isn't a critical consensus on the sequel (no review scores for OpenCritic or Metacritic) so although numerous websites report on the existence of the sequel, I sadly wasn't able to summarize a critical consensus
- That makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. Aoba47 (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- There sadly isn't a critical consensus on the sequel (no review scores for OpenCritic or Metacritic) so although numerous websites report on the existence of the sequel, I sadly wasn't able to summarize a critical consensus
- This is not required for a FAC/FA, but I would strongly encourage you to archive your web citations to avoid any potential headaches in the future. It seems like most of the citations are archived, but I am bringing this up as Citation 34 is not.
- Will do that real quick
- Citation 3 shows for me a publication date of March 14, 2021 rather than March 15, 2021. I know that sometimes depending on where the person accesses a site, the publication date can vary by a day or so. Could you double-check this one for me?
- That looks right, fixed
- The "Reception" box in the "Reception" section should list IGN Italia to be more specific and clarify that this review and score were not done by the main IGN website. This should also be clarified in the prose as well (and it should be consistently IGN Italia with IGN Italy removed).
- Done
- For the final paragraph of the "Reception" section, I would match the Kotaku and Nintendo Life citations to the appropriate sentences rather than lumping them together at the end. Nintendo Life should also be linked on the first instance in the prose.
- Done
- All of the citations are reliable and high-quality and in my opinion, they are appropriate for a potential FA on a video game. I used WP:VG/RS to double-check things and I did not notice any issues.
- I did a brief spot-check to make sure the information is supported in the citations. Citation 2 is being used to support a part on "Night Terrors", but I do not see that phrase in the article. I do see a discussion on a similar mechanic known as "Dark Rooms". Is that what is being referenced?
- Yeah I think that was a mistake on my part, I must have confused Dark Rooms with another minigame in Help Wanted with similar mechanics called Night Terrors. Fixed.
- Citation 14 is being used to support a part on the delay in the game's release, but I do not see that discussed in the actual source. I see that citation talks about the April 2019 release, but I do not see any mention of a delay unless I am missing it.
- Missed that too. I rephrased it to say that it was planned for release in April, but was initially launched in May. Should I look for another source to confirm the delay if possible?
- The current wording should be fine. It is pretty clear that some sort of delay took place as the announced release date did not end up happening. You could look for another source to add the "delay" wording back in the article, but I do not think it is really necessary. Aoba47 (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Missed that too. I rephrased it to say that it was planned for release in April, but was initially launched in May. Should I look for another source to confirm the delay if possible?
I hope that this review is helpful and best of luck with the FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 20:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Aoba47, thanks for the review. A few replies above. Fathoms Below (talk) 22:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for addressing everything. I have left a few comments above. Aoba47 (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Aoba47 follow-up to the above. Added the translated title parameters. Again, thanks for the review! Fathoms Below (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for addressing everything. This passes my source review. I have a quick side question, but does anything from this game tie into the next one (i.e. Five Nights at Freddy's: Security Breach)? Again, this question is more so for me as I am curious and does not affect my review at all. Aoba47 (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not much ties into the next game. Although the plot of all the games and books is loosely connected, the most Help Wanted ties into Security Breach (without getting into excessive detail) is the teaser at the end with the Christmas tree farm and building that is under construction. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- That makes sense. Thank you for the response. Aoba47 (talk) 20:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Not much ties into the next game. Although the plot of all the games and books is loosely connected, the most Help Wanted ties into Security Breach (without getting into excessive detail) is the teaser at the end with the Christmas tree farm and building that is under construction. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for addressing everything. This passes my source review. I have a quick side question, but does anything from this game tie into the next one (i.e. Five Nights at Freddy's: Security Breach)? Again, this question is more so for me as I am curious and does not affect my review at all. Aoba47 (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Aoba47 follow-up to the above. Added the translated title parameters. Again, thanks for the review! Fathoms Below (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for addressing everything. I have left a few comments above. Aoba47 (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Aoba47, thanks for the review. A few replies above. Fathoms Below (talk) 22:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Image review
- Suggest adding alt text. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have added some alt text @Nikkimaria. Anything else needed? Thanks, Fathoms Below (talk) 12:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's it for the image review. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Support from Joe
[edit]Forthcoming JOEBRO64 00:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- TheJoebro64 are you still planning on reviewing this article? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 17:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- yeah, have some notes. Should post them later tonight. JOEBRO64 19:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- ... a sequel, Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted 2, was released on December 14, 2023. → Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted 2, was released on December 14, 2023. My general advice is that you don't need to tell the reader something called [Title] 2 is a sequel to [Title]. Readers aren't stupid! I think you can bin "a sequel".
- Done
- I think you need to provide sources for the last two paragraphs of the plot section, as I think things like talking about the differences between endings and a change that was made post-launch are the kind of things that go beyond a "straightforward summary" as outlined in WP:VG/PLOT.
- I can't find any reliable sources for the endings (the best I could find was a brief mention for the endings of the non-notable Help Wanted 2) I think VGPLOT is saying that sources should be required for any conclusions that must be determined through interpretation, and while I would have liked having some sources for the events of each ending, I don't think there is much that I can do in this case. There are some plot sections in video game FAs that have multiple endings but use only the game as a primary source. However, I can remove the change that was made post-launch with the Christmas tree farm.
- Based on how it's written, I'm not really sure if the stuff about the promo artwork using fan art on accident is necessary. I think it'd be different if it was something within the game itself and/or it impacted the game's long-term reception in the press, but this kind of marketing slip-up isn't really unheard of. If there's more context that could be integrated from the book in question I think that'd be good.
- I couldn't find much else in the book, and I could remove that bit if you would like. I just wanted to be comprehensive and it showed up in an academic book, so I thought it wouldn't hurt to include.
- I would try to condense the third paragraph of development and release, as it falls into WP:PROSELINE territory as currently written. Here's something you could do:
- Current: A Nintendo Switch port was released on May 21, 2020. A port for Oculus Quest was released on July 16, 2020, followed by versions for Android and iOS on October 26. An Xbox One port was released on October 29, 2020.
- Revised: Ports for other consoles and headsets followed throughout 2020, including for Nintendo Switch on May 21, Oculus Quest on July 16, Android and iOS on October 26, and Xbox One on October 29.
- Done, good catch
- In the sequel section, if the game managed to be released on its initially announced release date, then there's no need to state when the date was announced.
- Current: On May 24, 2023, during a PlayStation Showcase, Steel Wool Studios announced Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted 2, with a planned launch in late 2023. A PlayStation Blog post by Steel Wool Studios on November 20, 2023, announced a release for PlayStation VR2 on December 14, 2023, and disclosed many of the minigames. The game was launched on that date for Oculus Quest and PlayStation VR2.
- Revised: On May 24, 2023, during a PlayStation Showcase, Steel Wool Studios announced Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted 2. It was released on December 14, 2023, for Oculus Quest and PlayStation VR2.
- Will fix soon
- Also, I think you should fill us in on some details regarding the sequel. What's new?
- I think I could include a bit on the endings that I found earlier, I will do an extra check to make sure I didn't miss anything important.
- Reference spotchecks forthcoming.
- Aoba47 did a few earlier, but you can check again if you would like.
JOEBRO64 03:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Joe for your comments! A few replies above. I'll finish the last couple shortly and then work on Donkey Kong. Sorry for the delay, I just returned to admin work and it's been eating up my time that I would otherwise spend on content. Fathoms Below (talk) 16:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- No worries. I'm taking another look at the moment and I'll let you know what I think. JOEBRO64 16:52, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- For the sequel section, I added some information that I found in a review, but there wasn't much else that I could include. The source I found for the endings was full of cruft, and I decided to not include it. Is there anything else you would change Joe? No worries if you end up replying late, I know you're probably busy with school and all. Fathoms Below (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Fathoms Below: I would say remove the Christmas tree farm thing in plot and then we should be good to go. JOEBRO64 15:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done, thanks. Fathoms Below (talk) 15:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Fathoms Below: I would say remove the Christmas tree farm thing in plot and then we should be good to go. JOEBRO64 15:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Joe for your comments! A few replies above. I'll finish the last couple shortly and then work on Donkey Kong. Sorry for the delay, I just returned to admin work and it's been eating up my time that I would otherwise spend on content. Fathoms Below (talk) 16:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
750h
[edit]- lead
- that unlock collectable objects ==> "that unlock collectible objects" ("collectible" is preferred in American English)
- Done
- studio's adaptation, and decided remove the comma
- Done
- as first released on May 28, 2019 for Windows through Oculus Rift add a comma after "2019" per MOS:COMMA
- Done
- gameplay
- to obtain collectable objects ==> "to obtain collectible objects"
- Done
- plot
- In an attempt to improve their image, Fazbear Entertainment ==> "In an attempt to improve its image, Fazbear Entertainment". In American English "its" is more standard for singular entities like a company.
- Done
- urban legends, before cutting remove the comma
- Done
- Following the release of the non-VR versions of the game, a door in a final ==> "Following the release of the non-VR versions of the game, a door at the final"
- Done
- development and release
- be replaced afterwards ==> "be replaced afterward"
- Done
- released on October 23, 2020 and additional add a comma after "2020"
- Done
- reception
- Wool Studios on November 20, 2023 announced the game's release for PlayStation VR2 on December 14, 2023 and disclosed add a comma after both of the dates.
- Done
That's all I got @Fathoms Below:. Nice work on the article. 750h+ 08:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks again 750h+, I believe that I have addressed your comments. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Happy to support. 750h+ 00:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks again 750h+, I believe that I have addressed your comments. Fathoms Below (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Support from Crisco
[edit]- Would be nice for the lede to have how many games were adapted (average reader isn't going to know how many there were in the series at that point). Seems to be missing in the body too
- The sources say that the anthology includes the games from FNAF 1 to Sister Location, which is five games in total, though the source does not specify that it is five games in total. I clarified this in the lead. Does my wording work?
- the player controls a user for the "Freddy Fazbear Virtual Experience", - A user for the, or of the?
- Changed to "of the"
- Meant as a warning for players, they are covertly recorded by one of the playtesters, who exposes a lawsuit involving a past employee of Fazbear Entertainment, Jeremy, that put the game's completion in jeopardy. - Meant to warn players in our reality, or the player character?
- Meant to warn the player character
- Any sources saying why there was a delay?
- None that I could find, just that there was one
- Any Metacritic/other aggregator data for PC and Oculus Rift?
- I checked, there is no aggregated review score for PC and Rift
- Is Help Wanted 2 worth redlinking?
- Help Wanted 2 links to the Sequel subsection, so it wouldn't be a redlink. Would you like me to wikilink it?
- No, that would be a self-referential redirect, and I think WP:SELFREDIRECT would in this instance be against linking it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Help Wanted 2 links to the Sequel subsection, so it wouldn't be a redlink. Would you like me to wikilink it?
That's it from me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Fathoms Below? FrB.TG (talk) 09:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Crisco 1492 I think I addressed all of your comments. Fathoms Below (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. This looks good, and I'm happy to support. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Crisco 1492 I think I addressed all of your comments. Fathoms Below (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Query
[edit]@FAC coordinators: anything else needed here? Sorry that this nomination took a while Fathoms Below (talk) 15:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- As this is your first FAC article, it will need a spot check for source to text fidelity. I shall request one and hopefully someone will be along within a few days. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Gog the Mild I have 4 FAs, and Aoba47 did a spot check. I renamed from The Night Watch. You voted on my RfA earlier this year haha! Fathoms Below (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- I thought I remembered seeing prior FACs when I decided not to give you the standard first-timers' greeting. But I don't see you on Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations. Ah, name change. I remember reviewing Shovel Knight Showdown, a nice piece of work. Ok. All done, including my final read through. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.