User talk:Cielquiparle/Archive 2

Barnstar of Excellence

	Barnstar of Excellence
	Excellent expansion of the Francis B. Murdoch article, particularly regarding his role in litigating freedom suits and as a newspaperman... and then nominating it for a DYK. –CaroleHenson (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @CaroleHenson! Great collaboration. Has been inspiring to see all the intersections and look forward to the next one. Cielquiparle (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harriet Robinson Scott

Wonderful work. The page looks so great! Be4waugh (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for following and your past research for that page. Cielquiparle (talk) 12:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Francis B. Murdoch

On 12 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Francis B. Murdoch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that lawyer Francis B. Murdoch filed one-third of all freedom suits in St. Louis from 1840 to 1847, representing Dred Scott, Harriet Robinson Scott, Lucy A. Delaney and Polly Berry, among others? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Francis B. Murdoch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Francis B. Murdoch), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Verena Conzett

I have nominated the article and included you as a creator in the nomination so you get a credit for it. Feel free to suggest other hooks.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 09:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paradise Chronicle Looks good, thank you! (Shortened slightly and added English source for ALT hook.) Just wanted to ask, is it supposed to appear under February 27 or February 20 on the DYK page? (Still figuring out how DYK works.) Cielquiparle (talk) 12:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have now proposed a second ALT hook and gone ahead and moved the nomination up on the DYK page (to February 20). Cielquiparle (talk) 16:27, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How DYK works, we can always learn more. I guess the reviewer would like to trim the article a bit. And for the long run, the autobiography published in her own publishing house is a good primary source but wikipedia specifically prefers secondary sources. See WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY. Anyway, most of what I read in her own bio, I also read in the Treichler book (A secondary source), sometimes even in more detail than I found it in the article, so if this gets an issue we need to improve a bit on the sourcing. For example the text cited by the source of the pages 171-177 from the Conzett bio could be split, made more precise and supported with a secondary Treichler source. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Paradise Chronicle, have cleaned up and cut further. Let me know if you have any other questions / thoughts. May add a few more sources which may trigger further minor edits but will try to keep it simple. Cielquiparle (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for David Nelson (abolitionist)

On 5 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Nelson (abolitionist), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the second college founded by David Nelson was known as an "abolitionist factory"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Nelson (abolitionist). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, David Nelson (abolitionist)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

Hi Cielquiparle,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 17:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tatiana Saunders

On 11 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tatiana Saunders, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tatiana Saunders is now goalkeeper for the equal pay team Lewes Football Club Women after playing for U.S., Icelandic and French teams? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tatiana Saunders. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tatiana Saunders), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 00:30, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Floating Freedom School

On 11 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Floating Freedom School, which you recently nominated. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Floating Freedom School. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Floating Freedom School), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 00:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Redirect2203111

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Redirect2203111 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. (t · c) buidhe 10:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Buidhe Apologies for the error (intended the page to have been created in User space) and thank you very much for speedily deleting! Cielquiparle (talk) 10:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no worries, that's what it's for. In future, if you accidentally create a page just copy and past {{g7}} and an admin will delete it. (t · c) buidhe 10:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, Cielquiparle, and thanks for creating several well presented biographies of women. It seems to me you would be a useful member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are chipping away at the gender gap. You can do so by registering in the box at the top of our project page. But even if you do not join, I look forward to many more articles about women. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Ipigott! What does membership entail? Is it different from contributing articles? Cielquiparle (talk) 12:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are no firm obligations although we do of course encourage members to create articles about women and their works. As you probably know, less than 20% of biographies on the English Wikipedia are about women. Each month we put together two or three priorities on which we think it would be useful to work. We find it useful to help each other along and whenever possible we provide support to those who run into problems. We have a wide variety of redlists pointing to women who may deserve biographies. You can find out more about our activities and the support we offer on the main wp:Women in Red page and on its talk page, probably the most active of any wikiproject.--Ipigott (talk) 12:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Ipigott, will check it out. Out of curiosity, is membership what triggers automated newsletter delivery to one's User Talk page? Or is that triggered in another way? Cielquiparle (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish, I can add you name to our mailing list now but I'll certainly add it if you become a member. For the time being, you can see below our priorities for March.--Ipigott (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much, @Ipigott. The whole reason I found my first WiR event in the first place was through this newsletter on someone else's Talk page. (So it did its job, amazing!) But now that I know how to find the events, I don't need the newsletter anymore, if that makes sense. That is one reason I haven't wanted to sign up as a member. It also took me a very long time to figure out that #1day1woman didn't necessarily mean you were signing up to create 1 new article a day, which I could never do. Anyway I have been nothing but impressed with what I've experienced so far through WiR. I'm just not sure I can commit to more than an event or an article here and there. Cielquiparle (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's fine but most members are far less active than you. Even if you join, if you don't want to receive the newsletter I can just leave your name off the mailing list. You can always see what we are doing under Events on our project page. If you haven't already done do, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies and some of our other essays. Just let me know if ever you run into difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red, March 2022

Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225

Online events:

New: Women's History Month Art+Activism | Feminism and Folklore | Dutch Caribbean
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman | Women in sport (Feb/Mar)

Other ways to participate:

Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Verena Conzett

On 14 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Verena Conzett, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Verena Conzett (pictured) found commercial success when she offered serial novels together with accident insurance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Verena Conzett. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Verena Conzett), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

women in collaboration

Thank you for quality articles about women making history, such as Verena Conzett, Snana, Azayamankawin, Miriam Moffitt, writing in collaboration such as expanding Maud Karpeles and Harriet Robinson Scott, for "hello draft", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2713 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Precious and many thanks @Gerda Arendt! Cielquiparle (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese Fables and Folk Stories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Book Company.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Minnesota State Capitol artwork

On 8 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Minnesota State Capitol artwork, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the golden rooftop charioteer (pictured) was removed during the restoration of the Minnesota State Capitol and its artwork? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Minnesota State Capitol artwork. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Minnesota State Capitol artwork), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating the article! Myotus (talk) 14:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chow Leung

On 17 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chow Leung, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chow Leung started a language school for children in Chicago before writing Chinese Fables and Folk Stories (illustration pictured) with Mary Hayes Davis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chow Leung. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chow Leung), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chinese Fables and Folk Stories

On 17 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chinese Fables and Folk Stories, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chow Leung started a language school for children in Chicago before writing Chinese Fables and Folk Stories (illustration pictured) with Mary Hayes Davis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chow Leung. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chinese Fables and Folk Stories), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Hayes Davis

On 17 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Hayes Davis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chow Leung started a language school for children in Chicago before writing Chinese Fables and Folk Stories (illustration pictured) with Mary Hayes Davis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chow Leung. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mary Hayes Davis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Royal Theater (St. Petersburg, Florida)

On 5 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Royal Theater (St. Petersburg, Florida), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Angela Bassett donated a dance studio at the Royal Theater in St. Petersburg? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Theater (St. Petersburg, Florida). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Royal Theater (St. Petersburg, Florida)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your rewrite of James Poovey. You seem to be acting in the spirit of "we're here to build an encyclopedia" I appreciate that. CT55555 (talk) 17:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @CT55555, also for your work on the front lines of the AfD process. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lucy Moss

On 20 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lucy Moss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at the age of 26, Lucy Moss became the youngest female director of a Broadway musical before directing a TikTok musical that raised $2 million? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lucy Moss. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lucy Moss), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Moss

Thanks for expanding the article about her! I've been obsessed with SIX lately so it was cool to see this article in the DYK section. Also, I like her last name. Anything that has anything to do with clovers or moss gets a smile from me. :) Clovermoss (talk) 21:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

She's one of a kind, no category! Great that @Clovermoss likes her story. DYK her crowning glory. For five, four, three, two, one more minute... Cielquiparle (talk) 23:12, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of female American football players‎

Personally, I think the criteria need to be tight and include only those who either already have an article, or warrant one based on available coverage. When coverage is purely of local interest trivia, e.g. high school firsts & records, homecoming queens, etc., or independent sources do not go beyond passing mentions in routine coverage, the people should not be in the list. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wjemather That was my original thinking as well. At one point, I was even on the fence if the high school section should even exist, given that so few of the players have Wikipedia pages (though as it turns out Maida's is just a stub even if having a movie made about you is notable).

After looking at what's there, I was wondering if it would be possible to have a different set of criteria just for the High school section. Without a doubt, Adults have to meet the normal standard of "notability". But for High school only, could we say:

Simply being a female player is not notable – there has to be something else establishing notability
High school firsts and records are not notable
County level firsts and records are not notable
League / conference level firsts and records are notable, if they are verifiable
State level firsts and records are notable, if they are verifiable
National / international firsts and records are notable
Certain awards are notable (mostly corresponding with above)

The other thing that has really given me pause while reviewing the page, is the fact that the list page itself has previously received media coverage, plus the fact that this page actually has historically had a lot of traffic. I think people are looking for these types of facts (see AV Club article here), there is interest in them, and we could provide them if they are verifiable and meet a certain standard of notability. Cielquiparle (talk) 12:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable but would just clarify that the source for verification should always be independent of the league/state/award/etc. and we should avoid woolly claims of firsts (e.g. "believed to be..."). The trouble with interesting facts (trivia) is they are very often not suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:27, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wjemather Yes thanks, will explicitly state the independent sources requirement in framing the criteria on the Talk page (personally I prefer multiple sources for most facts anyway). Point taken about not-a-trivia-almanac and avoiding woolly claims.

Will go back and and do another pass from the top. (Will probably add a few more notable high school players later but it would be a handful at most, no additional homecoming queens, and as USA Today notes, by 2017 female high school football players are not that uncommon anymore so it makes sense that notability is in some ways "harder" to achieve over time.) Cielquiparle (talk) 03:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed. It's much easier to justify inclusion of those without articles when multiple good sources exist. Good work. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wjemather: I just ordered The Women's Football Encyclopedia by Neal Rozendaal, so I'm all-in now. Unfortunately the most recent edition appears to be from 2016/2017 – we'll see how helpful it is once it arrives – but it seemed better than not having it at all. Whether this is technically TNT or not, it feels like taking a step back and looking from outside-in – what do the sources say, also about the bigger picture – can only lead to improvement. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good job with the penguins

I've come across West London Penguin Swimming and Water Polo Club. Very impressed with how well you have expanded the article since it was nominated for deletion. To go from one source to eighty four in a month must have taken quite a bit of work. RicDod (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @RicDod, I might have "gone off the deep end" with Penguin, but what a rich history, and thank goodness for the Wikipedia Library and Newspapers.com, etc. (Not to mention all the Olympic athlete pages, many of which are/were stubs, but for genuinely notable people.) Was also excited to have a reason to set foot in the British Library, absolutely thrilling. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also... @The wub: Please pass on to the team out that develops Visual Editor: Thank you for all the work that you do. Over the past year I have definitely noticed performance improvements and for a user like me it makes all the difference in the world. It just makes everything so much faster. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it! I passed on your message for them. And once again, fantastic work on rescuing the Penguins! the wub "?!" 16:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

I added an author credit for you at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Eiboeck. I can remove it if you don't want it. SL93 (talk) 19:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh nice, @SL93! Thanks so much. I was really surprised to find out so much about the German language press in Iowa. Plus the war over Prohibition. And then "printer's devil" as a topic sucked me in for a while (I didn't quite finish but at least that page doesn't say "citation needed" after every sentence anymore). Anyway, great find / addition to Wikipedia. It has also helped me to understand the Dakota War in Minnesota in a different way. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shared credit for DYKs is something that should happen wayn more often than it does. User:SL93 Good job! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ten Percent (TV series)

On 3 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ten Percent (TV series), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the adapted TV series Ten Percent was criticised as being too faithful to the original? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ten Percent (TV series). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ten Percent (TV series)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joseph Eiboeck

On 6 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Eiboeck, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Joseph Eiboeck called the period from July 4, 1884, to 1890 "a reign of terror for Iowa"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Eiboeck. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph Eiboeck), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Chapter

Hello Cielquiparle am just thinking, if this article does end up deleted I would consider deletion review and then merging all the content into Procter & Gamble. NemesisAT (talk) 11:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing

I saw you loaded Millie to en:wiki. You might want to look at the commons template called "PD-UK-unknown" which says that if the photographer is unknown (and "Daily Mirror" or "Smith, Jones and Brown Ltd" = unknown) and the photo is before 1952 (70 years ago) then its out of copyright. In this case Millie Hudson's photo is at a reputable location and they don't know the photographer - so quick check on google images and then use the template above. Just a tip - feel free to ignore (obvs) Victuallers (talk) 15:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hard core. Thanks Victuallers for the careful read-through, edits, and comments. (And welcome to the "Penguin Zone"!) Cielquiparle (talk) 18:52, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant Work

Women in Red's Inspirer Award

Did You Know that your article about Olympic diver Millie Hudson, who attempted to swim across the Strait of Gibraltar in 1928, inspired an article about the Hammersmith Ladies Swimming Club and it complemented the article about Belle White, the first British diver to win an Olympic medal? More than this your article has hinted that history needs to be corrected and we are. Victuallers (talk) 18:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Beveridge

Continuing from the article's talk page, it took about 30 seconds to type the name into the google books searchbox, so no big deal! the Jersey press photos are a very good find, but the portrait doesn't look much like any of the others, so much so that I did wonder if the newspaper had mis-indexed it. However, I got tired of fruitless newspaper searches and for my own satisfaction did 5 minutes of original research - which of course can't be used for Wikipedia - and from this there is no doubt, despite the coincidences, that these were two different men. I'm very happy to share it if you'd like, but as said it would be of no use for the article, although it may (or not, of course) give you a springboard from which more easily to find appropriate secondary material, so let me know if you're interested. Ingratis (talk) 07:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds intriguing, thanks Ingratis! So tantalising yet frustrating that the Jersey Evening Post donated that massive photographic archive to Jersey Heritage, yet the digitisation of their newspaper archives remains incomplete for exactly the decades we would need. Another major avenue to explore is several decades' worth of Swimming Times magazine, which would require a lot of in-person library time (plus pre-ordering volumes in advance), but having done some of that recently I'm not sure I want to do it again just yet. My interest in this really just stemmed from wanting everyone to exercise more caution before jumping to the conclusion that two individuals with the same name (and same middle initial) necessarily are the same person, as in the past I have spent weeks untangling historical biographies that got completely confused, as in Shakopee (Dakota leaders), Zhaagobe, and Sha-có-pay (within those three articles are references to six confirmed individuals called "Six", plus a possible seventh, and there were easily others). Cielquiparle (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were clearly right to be sceptical and it would been an odd combination. I've left a couple of notes at User:Ingratis/Temp page 2, mostly from the 1939 survey, which makes it clear that there were 2 different PHB's then in London. The diver was born just "Harry" but added the Peter, which was his father's name. He apparently died in 2002, but no information on where: his son's wife and child ended up in New Zealand. The policeman is certainly notable - I may put together a stub. I'm not sure whether civil registration indexes can be counted as secondary sources - lots of articles have them, but more extreme editors seem to like to delete them as OR - but the entries are available without subscription at freebmd<dot>org<dot>uk Ingratis (talk) 07:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinating. Thanks @Ingratis for the background info and leads. The Scotland Yard Big Five story sounds like a winner too. Happy editing! Cielquiparle (talk) 12:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Belle White

On 20 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Belle White, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olympic diver Millie Hudson, who attempted to swim across the Strait of Gibraltar in 1928, was a member of the Hammersmith Ladies Swimming Club along with Belle White, the first British diver to win an Olympic medal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Belle White. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Belle White), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Millie Hudson

On 20 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Millie Hudson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olympic diver Millie Hudson, who attempted to swim across the Strait of Gibraltar in 1928, was a member of the Hammersmith Ladies Swimming Club along with Belle White, the first British diver to win an Olympic medal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Belle White. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Millie Hudson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Cielquiparle. Thank you for your hard work on this article too! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the article, @Lugnuts, and for looking after it once we started expanding! She did so much, there actually is more I could still add to the article, but I'll give it a rest for today. :) Cielquiparle (talk) 07:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for West London Penguin Swimming and Water Polo Club

On 20 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article West London Penguin Swimming and Water Polo Club, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Olympic diver Millie Hudson, who attempted to swim across the Strait of Gibraltar in 1928, was a member of the Hammersmith Ladies Swimming Club along with Belle White, the first British diver to win an Olympic medal? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Belle White. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, West London Penguin Swimming and Water Polo Club), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:04, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for turning that article from a tyrannosaurus wreck into dino-mite. CT55555 (talk) 19:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh @CT55555: Thank you so much for making me laugh!!! I still can't stop laughing about page size. In a good way. And of course for all your hard work and thoughtfulness as always. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dakota War re-write

I was contacted by the Minnesota Project to go over the current article. My opinion is that it needed a complete re-write for multiple reasons. Here is the link to that sandbox. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcb133aco/New_sandbox I would appreciate your input. In my regular sandbox is an article for the Mankato Hangings you are welcome to look at also. Thank you Mcb133aco (talk)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Titus (dinosaur), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Natural History Museum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dakota page

Sorry. I have signed. As to size of edit and your revert. The Article needs a rewrite. Mcb133aco (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am liking your bulletpoint list of issues with the article, @Mcb133aco! Still working through the list, but as I go through each point, I've also been checking your proposed rewrite of the page for more information, so please know that all the effort you put into the draft has not been wasted. It is clear that you have been reading critically across multiple related Wikipedia pages, which are in need of fixing as well. We still have a long way to go to get that page to Military history B-class, but if/when we get there, you will have definitely played an important role in that. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for compliment. The article has major flaws starting with the title, which I believe came from the MHS. When it comes to the War the MHS has a corrupted history that should be issue on Wikipedia. Another opinion is that the MHS has developed a Mdewakanton centric world view of the Dacotah. That alone highlights the issue of pov in what they publish and should challenge their status as a Wikipedia reliable source. Using the noun Dakota without the adjective Eastern is an issue that comes from the laziness of the MHS. The use of the noun alone, as a descriptor, is unacceptable on multiple levels. Beyond that, the article suffers from a sanitized vocabulary and censoring of historic facts. It's grading is inflated, if a C is average. A D+ or C- would be more accurate. In the area of Military History the war has become unique in that the loser has gotten both the name of the conflict changed as well what they are called in the narrative. Those things could be issues in grading the article. I also believe the other active editor on this article is a candidate for a a COI tag.Mcb133aco (talk) 20:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 20:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, @Mcb133aco: This is an article about a war and we will never make everyone happy. There is lots of room on the Internet for many points of view, but Wikipedia has to maintain a NPOV and a few of the issues you have raised on the list will be more challenging to work through. But it's a net positive for everyone to discuss, and we need to respect multiple perspectives while working through them. (I agree with your grading by the way.) Cielquiparle (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Stair

Thank you for your work on Stanley Stair. I think it would have been deleted if not for you. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 03:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Polycarpa aurata: Thanks for your work in finding and adding the sources to begin with. What a gem of a story! I also learned from this process that it's often hard to discuss these issues in the abstract, and you don't really know what is there until you try to engage with the content and attempt to fix. Cielquiparle (talk) 20:30, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Mail reference at West London Penguin Swimming and Water Polo Club

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at West London Penguin Swimming and Water Polo Club. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:30, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Robby.is.on. I will remove it, if it hasn't been removed already. I actually wasn't relying on it as a source for anything but to note that some sources refer to the club as "London Penguins" but I'm sure we can find other instances of that. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Thanks for finding a better source. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 20:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ellaisa Marquis

On 18 July 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ellaisa Marquis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ellaisa Marquis has been called the "marquis player" of women's football in Saint Lucia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ellaisa Marquis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ellaisa Marquis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mdewakanton-Wahpekute 38 +2

This article was submitted and rejected. The stated reason was that the Dakota War article covers the topic and that there had been no discussion for a stand alone article on the subject. Do you have any thoughts on that. Mcb133aco (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)mcb133Mcb133aco (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize you were in a rush to submit. (You're running fast in a lot of directions, @Mcb133aco – I'm having trouble keeping up!) A better approach might be to work in Draft space (rather than User space), so that other editors can contribute and comment. A lot of good Military history articles start like that. My advice would be to cut the first half of the article, which does overlap a lot with the main Dakota War page, and focus on the trial and executions – or maybe the trial and the executions have separate pages. And/or, we can start with the List of the individuals who were executed first, which was my first suggestion to you, as a standalone page. Anyway, I think you need to prioritize a bit and make sure we're not introducing even more quality problems. It is July 21 now and we have ~10 more days left in August, which is when everyone starts looking up the Dakota War again and we'll see a spike in traffic. I think we should focus on checking and fixing all the Dakota War pages – the ones that need the most work are the main massacre pages (starting with Attack at the Lower Sioux Agency). For the executions, it would be good if we could have any new content published by December, so we have some time to get it right; it is a complex and difficult subject, which I think needs to be more of a collaborative effort. In the meantime, I'll keep working on the list of issues you flagged for the main Dakota War page. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:37, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rush is not a word I would use. I had a good deal of time into this article when the editor asked me to look at the War. I told them that the War would have to wait. When I had the 38+2 complete I encountered two view points. One that it was a stand alone subject while the other was that it should be rolled into the War. At that point I looked at the War and decided it would be simpler to combine the content. I do not see that as going in many directions, but that is my viewpoint. I have no knowledge of Draft space. You reverted my edit, I am thinking you should revert my bullet list too, there is more that could have been listed. Thank youMcb133aco (talk) 15:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 15:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You decided to use the bullet-list I posted to explain my edit as a to-do list for yourself. My opinion is that you are the one going in different directions. It very much seems that you act as though you "Own" the Dakota article and act as a gatekeeper.Mcb133aco (talk)mcb133Mcb133aco (talk)

@Mcb133aco: That was not my intention at all. I thought we should respect the points you raised and try to address them. I think the discussion on the article Talk page has been good so far. Let's keep editing and discussing and improving the article. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBC Studio

Hi. Just to let you now I closed this AFD, and moved the content to a new List of BBC studios page to form the set index page. I think what I have done reflects the consensus that was reached, but please let me know if you meant something else. I wanted to let you know directly as you suggested that you might work on the set index page. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 03:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the Set index page, @TigerShark and for letting me know. I'll start working on the content. (I think I actually meant for "BBC Studio" to redirect to "BBC Studios" as a misspelling-type Redirect, but I'll work on the actual content of the Set index page first and then work out next steps after that so that I'm 100% sure it's the right move, and we don't keep moving in circles... It may turn out it's fine the way it is now.) Cielquiparle (talk) 04:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Theatre Royal, Southampton

Hi there, hope your well. First and foremost, I am incredibly thankful and grateful for your edits to Theatre Royal, Southampton. The expansion and sources (which may I say are excellent finds) have massively improved the article from what it was originally at the time when nominated for deletion.

In response to your improvements made over the past two days, I have withdrawn my AFD. There was a discussion within the AFD from Mjroots that suggested that the article could be draftified, but due to the impressive expansion in such a short amount of time, I don’t think that is even no longer necessary. Perhaps I may have been a bit quick/harsh with the AFD, but up to that point there had been little edits or discussion surrounding the article, and to put it mildly, it was essentially neglected. It felt like a lost cause after I was struggling to find information about the theatre. However, the AFD did bring some good, bringing some much needed attention and improvements to a page that seemed to have fallen into the shadows.

Overall, I would like to again thank you for your finds and improvements to Theatre Royal, Southampton which was an ultimate factor in the page surviving. Great work! Fats40boy11 (talk) 10:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fats40boy11: It was a good lesson on why it’s not OK to create two-sentence stubs in mainspace without reliable sources. All the key facts in the stub were wrong. Even the picture was misleading. And you were right that it wasn’t easy to find sources. It was an appropriate AfD nomination. If no one turned up to help solve the history mystery, it would have been perfectly fine to draftify or delete. As it stood, the information was bad.

That said, thanks for withdrawing your nomination and for your comments! Agree that in the end it was a net positive. Appreciate your professionalism and considerateness and hope you are enjoying EURO 2022. (First half yesterday was a nail-biter…) Cielquiparle (talk) 12:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, you deserve the praise. I did get confused when before the nomination it said that the theatre was destroyed by a bomb in 1940 whilst the source said 1942. This isn’t mentioning that this was confused with Mayflower Theatre. As you’ve found, there were a range of misleading information beforehand, and I’m surprised it didn’t get flagged sooner. I have no doubt that the article was made in good faith, but it was in poor shape and I do find it frustrating when stubs are created and then abandoned for others to do the hard work.

In regards to EURO 2022, I am most certainly enjoying it and let’s finish the job on Sunday! Hope your enjoying it too. Fats40boy11 (talk) 13:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue Barnstar

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		I think that it’s only fitting that you receive this for your work at rescuing Theatre Royal, Southampton, and I’m sure there are many more to come. Great work! Fats40boy11 (talk) 14:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fats40boy11, hope you are ok. In case you are open to distractions at the moment and/or have connections in Southampton...I was wondering if we could get a photo of the Theatre Royal site for lower down on the page (added via Commons). Maybe a photo of the historical marker (like this one) and a photo of the "high rise" itself (since we're referencing it in the DYK hook)? What do you think? (Not a priority by any means, it was just a thought.) Cielquiparle (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cielquiparle. I think that’s a great idea. I know exactly where it is, near the Southampton Register office and Medieval Merchant's House on French Street.

I’m not sure how soon I’d be able to get this, but I will attempt to get some photos the next time I head in that area. Fats40boy11 (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just further to this, I’ve just looked at my calendar and I will be heading into that area on Saturday. If I have time, I’ll definitely attempt to get some photos. Fats40boy11 (talk) 18:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Fats40boy11 Awesome, in that case we'll definitely beat the article hitting the main page, as it's not yet in the queue...! Cielquiparle (talk) 19:12, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue Barnstar

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		I want to award you for your outstanding work at Barbara of Württemberg. Keep up your great work! Taung Tan (talk) 20:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Taung Tan, also for your edits. I still have some questions about sourcing though, which I've left on the article Talk page. Please take a look. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stanley Stair

On 3 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stanley Stair, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at 107 years old, Stanley Stair of Jamaica was at the time of his death the last surviving Caribbean veteran of World War I? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stanley Stair. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stanley Stair), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,781 views (481.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	You've really improved Helen Mary Wilkes and I sense have put a lot of effort in care into the article. I hope you put this star on your barn with pride. CT55555 (talk) 15:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CT55555: The article was in dire straits, but it helped to take a different tack with all hands on deck. Thanks for taking the helm on this one, it helps so much that you know the ropes and are willing to sail close to the wind when needed. Cielquiparle (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also award you the pun bar star. lol CT55555 (talk) 20:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations and "something else"

Hi there Cielquiparle! Looking here I see you are a great editor and I want to congratulate you for your work. Great editors are rare and in short supply! Ok, so I read what you asked me to about linkrot, and went to a page that supposedly fixes some of it. It fixed some of the bare urls' on Christy Martin vs. Deirdre Gogarty, I think . Go check it out and let me know if there is more I can do or should do! Thanks and God bless! Antonio I am really a Rock Star!! Martin (que me dices?) 08:47, 8 August, 2022 (UTC)

Hello @AntonioMartin:! Thanks for the update and for the kind words. To be honest, I am quite torn now because I will probably need to resign as your DYK reviewer if I start helping you too much. It is great that you made a start with Reflinks, but there is still a lot to do (with the URL clean up but also other points I had mentioned in the DYK review). I am still trying to think of the best way to help you get this across the finish line, but will get back to you. In the meantime, keep going with the improvements! Cielquiparle (talk) 18:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soldiers vs Warriors ~ Dakota War

You accepted another editors source for maintaining the use of soldier without verifying the word they cite: akiçita:. A simple google produces the definition in the Dakota Dictionary Online @ University of Minnesota: "warrior".^[1] That dictionary has no listing for the word "soldier". According to the 1852 Riggs Dakota Dictionary the primary meaning of the word akiçita: is "warrior". The 1890 reprint of the dictionary leaves the definition unchanged. Both editions list "soldier" as a secondary definition. Given that the war took place between publications the definition listed is the most applicable to the Dakota War narrative, not one published 100 years post-war. That other editor cites the current Sissiton Dictionary without explanation as to why the historic "primary definition" has been replaced. That raises the question of creditability of the source. The change in definitions is significant enough to raise the question of editor bias in the source. There are too many sources written by amateurs concerning the war. The revisionist effort to paint Little Crows warriors as soldiers is an example. "Soldiers" are trained in the "conventional warfare" of their period. Warriors are trained as "asymmetrical warfare" fighters or guerrillas throughout history. The Military History project does not interchange combatants of one type of warfare with the other and identify all as being the same. The Military History Project should not grade this article above a "C" while it identifies Little Crows warriors were soldiers. Using "soldiers" in place of "warriors" is an attempt to rewrite the historic narrative. The use of Soldier for Warrior reflects a revisionist rewrite utilizing inaccurate terminology. The fact that you can cite multiple sources that failed to verify correct terminology and comprehend the content illustrates a Wikipedia issue whereby poorly researched sources are given creditability by meeting the reliability standard of simply getting published. The Dakota War soldiers vs warriors is an example of this.Mcb133aco (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Historian Gary Clayton Anderson, as well as the Minnesota Historical Society, seem to use "soldier" and "warrior" interchangeably. Anderson also writes extensively about the role of the "soldiers' lodge" as a group. @Mcb133aco, if you really want to pursue this discussion further, you could post to the Talk page for one of the WikiProjects, like Military History or Indigenous People of North America. Be careful not to fall into WP:SOAPBOX. Cielquiparle (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anderson and the MHS did not write the Dakota Dictionary so why do you reference them? Neither one has a neutral pov. Do you consider them better sources than the Dictionary?156.99.40.14 (talk) 17:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)mcb133aco156.99.40.14 (talk) 17:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Mcb133aco (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 17:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you yourself said, the Dakota–English Dictionary by Stephen Return Riggs lists both "warrior" and "soldier" as possible definitions. Anyway, I understand your frustration. Why not open the discussion with a broader community on one of the WikiProject pages? These issues come up all the time. Cielquiparle (talk) 18:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ [1]

DYK for Edward Duplex

On 11 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edward Duplex, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1888, Edward P. Duplex became the first African American to be elected a mayor in California? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Duplex. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Edward Duplex), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Collingham Gardens

On 13 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Collingham Gardens, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when reggae musician Bob Marley was arrested in London for cannabis possession, he falsely told the police he lived in Collingham Gardens? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Collingham Gardens. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Collingham Gardens), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Thomas Yarborough

On 13 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Thomas Yarborough, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1948, Thomas Yarborough became the first African American to be elected as a city council member in California? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Yarborough. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Thomas Yarborough), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and

Thanks for your extensive contribution to Banaras Law Journal. Wondering if you can kindly contribute to:

Both are historical and important journals in their respective fields in India, but currently under WP:AfD. Thanks again, User4edits (talk) 21:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User4edits: Academic journals are hard. At first, I wondered why you published 2 articles to mainspace with no secondary sources, but I think I understand now that you were trying to write them according to what the essay said (which turned out to be "just an essay" and not a policy or guideline, and somewhat confusing). In the end, always safest to stick to WP:GNG. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 19:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Recovery
		During your routine contributions, you made important contributions to Banaras Law Journal which was facing deletion at that time. With your diligent and extensive research you not only substantially improved the quality of the article, but also prevented the deletion of an important article from Wikipedia. You serve as an inspiration. For this, I am proud to present to you, the Barnstar of Recovery. Please accept my compliments herewith. User4edits (talk) 19:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rina Amiri

On 19 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rina Amiri, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the US Special Envoy for Afghan women and girls, Rina Amiri, is a former refugee who told US Senator John Kerry that "the Afghan population is not the Taliban"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rina Amiri. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rina Amiri), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Graeme Saunders (sailor)

On 21 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Graeme Saunders (sailor), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Canadian brothers Graeme and Jacob Saunders learned to sail at the Chester Yacht Club, and campaigned a two-person dinghy in the 2016 Summer Olympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jacob Saunders. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Graeme Saunders (sailor)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jacob Saunders

On 21 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jacob Saunders, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Canadian brothers Graeme and Jacob Saunders learned to sail at the Chester Yacht Club, and campaigned a two-person dinghy in the 2016 Summer Olympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jacob Saunders. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jacob Saunders), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chester Yacht Club

On 21 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chester Yacht Club, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Canadian brothers Graeme and Jacob Saunders learned to sail at the Chester Yacht Club, and campaigned a two-person dinghy in the 2016 Summer Olympics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jacob Saunders. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chester Yacht Club), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Theatre Royal, Southampton

On 24 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Theatre Royal, Southampton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Theatre Royal, Southampton (pictured), which Jane Austen visited in 1807, was described in 2013 as having "morphed into a hideous high-rise"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Theatre Royal, Southampton. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Theatre Royal, Southampton), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde 00:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great job! We'd love to see your articles up on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge! Anything done since 2016 can be added.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sweet Vengeance Mine

On 27 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sweet Vengeance Mine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Sweet Vengeance Mine was owned and operated by Black miners during the California Gold Rush? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sweet Vengeance Mine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sweet Vengeance Mine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Beth Nealson

On 5 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Beth Nealson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first woman mayor in Metropolitan Toronto, Beth Nealson, ran against True Davidson in a 1966 mayoral race called the "Battle of the Belles"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beth Nealson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Beth Nealson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for Ginger Howard

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		Nice job with editing Ginger Howard. You put all the pieces together nicely. DaffodilOcean (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DaffodilOcean Thanks for your edits and Newspaper.com clippings I stumbled on because you were several steps ahead, sorry for the edit conflict, and thanks as well for your hard work earlier this summer in fixing the bio for the Ambassador! (Still not entirely comfortable with the awkward way in which Wikipedia ends up communicating with BLP subjects...) Cielquiparle (talk) 05:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was just coming here, too, to thank you for improving Ginger Howard and other articles that come to discussion at AFD. What we ultimately want here is quality articles and your attention to articles on the margin of a delete debate really enhances the project. I can imagine how much time this costs you so thank you for all of your contributions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I keep expecting to lose interest and move on to other things, but so many interesting content questions come up during deletion discussions. I'm glad some of the comments and article improvements have been useful. Thanks for all your hard work @Liz in keeping the machine running, also with the bigger picture in mind. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Danny Kaleikini

Hello! Your submission of Danny Kaleikini at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 03:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of medical schools in the Caribbean

Hello, Cielquiparle,

You did such an impressive job with Washington University of Barbados, could you glance at List of medical schools in the Caribbean and make sure the listing for this defunct university is accurate? You probably now know more about this school than anyone on Wikipedia. Thanks for any help you can provide. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Can of worms!!! The easy part was deleting WUB from that page completely (since the header says list of "current" medical schools)...but much of the information on that page is suspect, and I've now posted my first query to the Reliable sources/Noticeboard. More to follow from this, I'm sure. Cielquiparle (talk) 06:57, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleonike Damianakes

Have created two hook options for Cleonike Damianakes. Apologies if they read like clickbait, but we do want people to read the article. You are of course most welcome to create other hooks, and to continue expanding. Edwardx (talk) 21:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Edwardx: I laughed. Cielquiparle (talk) 21:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will count that as a result. Edwardx (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Danny Kaleikini

On 29 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Danny Kaleikini, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Danny Kaleikini (pictured) once worked as a singing hotel busboy in Waikiki before becoming the headline entertainer at the Kahala Hilton for 28 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Danny Kaleikini. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Danny Kaleikini), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 04:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Kahala Hotel & Resort

On 29 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Kahala Hotel & Resort, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Danny Kaleikini (pictured) once worked as a singing hotel busboy in Waikiki before becoming the headline entertainer at the Kahala Hilton for 28 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Danny Kaleikini. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Kahala Hotel & Resort), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 04:38, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleon

She gets four image-heavy pages in Salisbury's book, but no other authors or covers are mentioned. Edwardx (talk) 23:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Edwardx Thanks. Referred back to the way you originally had it, and added books from Jackets Required. Please check. Now in a race against time (!) to find better image for infobox. Will keep you posted. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cleo Damianakes

On 10 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cleo Damianakes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cleo Damianakes's 1920s book dust jacket designs "made sex respectable", but Hemingway did not like the "large misplaced breasts" on A Farewell to Arms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cleonike Damianakes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cleo Damianakes), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Good work on Cleo Damianakes Whispyhistory (talk) 16:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hear, hear! The hook led to over 10,000 views on the day. Suprisingly, Gilbert Bundy (same day hook) had 18,000. Who would have thought that suicide would out-score sex? Edwardx (talk) 13:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks both! @Whispyhistory

@Edwardx: I was going to point out that A Farewell to Arms was at ~10.7k yesterday, but Battle of Tarawa exceeded that as well at 11.7k! So when it comes to Venus and Mars, maybe War wins over Love after all. (Who writes these hooks anyway?) Congratulations on your smashing double DYK day. Cielquiparle (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message

Hi and thanks for the email. I'm doing ok by spending my time on off-wikipedia stuff. CT55555 (talk) 12:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Action Deaf Youth

On 15 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Action Deaf Youth, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after visiting Hungary in 2015, members of Action Deaf Youth headed to Stormont to demand better sign language support in Northern Ireland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Action Deaf Youth. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Action Deaf Youth), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brendan Bechtel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fortune.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Seven Days (magazine)

On 17 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Seven Days (magazine), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1979 the magazine Seven Days advised, to avoid ingesting plutonium orally, "never make an A-bomb on an empty stomach"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Seven Days (magazine). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Seven Days (magazine)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde 12:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pronunciation of ukulele

And I just saw the article talkpage. That. Is. A. Mess. 😳

Maybe you've got an idea though (Hawaiian topics use "oo-kulele"^[1], others use the more common yew-kulele), as it doesn't look like anyone proposed it there. I'd gone out and done my due diligence, but since all the sources besides blogs etc. said "yew-kulele", it seemed fairly straightforward. Apparently it wasn't. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:50, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mahalo @Mako001! It. Is. Indeed. I am now thinking of flagging it, not to the Ukulele Talk page, but to MOS:HAWAII. Cielquiparle (talk) 12:37, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely needs some sort of broader (and hopefully more conclusive) discussion. There are few things more frustrating than a "no consensus" for something that really needs it, one way or the other. I care less about what the consensus is, than I do about simply having one. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 12:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ Not intended as an accurate phonetic representation of the whole word

Women in Red

Hi there, Cielquiparle, and welcome to Women in Red. On the basis of the women's biographies you have already created and your suggestions on our talk page, you should be a useful contributor to the project. If you wish, you can add the WiR template to your user page. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 14:33, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2022

Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247

Online events:

New: Alphabet run: I and J | Women in Education | Geofocus Central & Southern Asia
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

See also:

Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Toasting fork

On 30 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Toasting fork, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that extendable marshmallow toasting forks were cited as an example of how glamping has "ruined" camping? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Toasting fork. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Toasting fork), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For work on Josie Aiello. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Brendan Bechtel

On 7 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brendan Bechtel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of Chairman and CEO Brendan Bechtel's first jobs was to install security cables for laptops at Bechtel headquarters in San Francisco when he was 14 years old? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brendan Bechtel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brendan Bechtel), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Meteor Studios

On 11 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Meteor Studios, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Meteor Studios created "realistic CG on TV budgets", but went bankrupt after completing visual effects work for Journey to the Center of the Earth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Meteor Studios. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Meteor Studios), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Swimming with dolphins

Thanks, but you don't have to do that--oddly enough that's the second such offer I've gotten today. I don't write that many anymore anyway. But your kindness and attention can benefit the project elsewhere: if you can help getting even one old DYK nomination out of the way, that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, and I hope you get lots of hits. Drmies (talk) 21:46, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Too late: I already did an initial review of yours immediately after I offered. Quite honestly, my heart sank when I saw what the topic was...but it is important and I realized I might as well be the one to review it. (Sorry...I should have left a message on your Talk page or pinged.) A difficult topic but I liked the structure and had a few suggestions and a question about the hook. Cielquiparle (talk) 02:47, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unicorns II merge

On the AFD discussion you offered assistance in the merge of the Unicorn-based short story anthologies. (Thank you for adding sources, by the way.) I've combined the two pages at Unicorns!, but that messed up some of the footnote naming/numbering. If I am being painfully honest, I admit that I'm NOT the person you want trying to fix citation errors. If you want to take a look at the merged article, I'd much appreciate it. Joyous! | Talk 17:16, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Joyous! for merging (what a great name). Citation clash appears to be fixed now. Cielquiparle (talk) 17:47, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! Joyous! | Talk 17:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Swimming with dolphins

On 18 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Swimming with dolphins, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of the first researchers to propose dolphin-assisted therapy for humans later renounced it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Swimming with dolphins. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Swimming with dolphins), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you for a good one, and the extra effort you put in to make it so! Opera and Advent choral music on my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Matthew Benham

On 22 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Matthew Benham, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that owner Matthew Benham influenced both Brentford FC in the UK and FC Midtjylland in Denmark to use mathematical modelling to recruit undervalued football players? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matthew Benham. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Matthew Benham), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!

Hi Cielquiparle, thank you so much for your effort on the Kamifusen (duo) page! The edits you made and the sources you added are very helpful! Really, really appreciate it! Sushi114Su (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear,@Sushi114Su. Thanks for going to the library and sharing what you learned and explaining so thoroughly. Made it easy to follow. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Christian Lamb

On 26 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christian Lamb, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at 102 years old, Christian Lamb is one of the last surviving officers of the Women's Royal Naval Service who served throughout World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christian Lamb. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Christian Lamb), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henry D. Sokolski

I saw your comment on at User talk:Vanamonde93's about wanting to see what conversation develops about whether this article should be the target or the source for the merge. It's been over a week since the AfD close, and no one has said anything on either talk page. I think that there won't be much discussion about it unless you start it, maybe pinging some of the major contributors to the article or others who seem knowledgeable. Joyous! | Talk 16:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Joyous! for following up and for the advice. I am working on some text and will try to post in the next 24 hours. Cielquiparle (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Elisabeth Griffith

On 3 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elisabeth Griffith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Elisabeth Griffith's sweeping 100-year history of the American equal-rights movement has been compared to listening to Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elisabeth Griffith. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elisabeth Griffith), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Cooper (New Jersey politician)

On 10 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Cooper (New Jersey politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the home of American revolutionary leader John Cooper was used by General Lord Cornwallis as his headquarters during the British occupation of Woodbury, New Jersey, in 1777? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Cooper (New Jersey politician). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Cooper (New Jersey politician)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Strawberry pie

On 15 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Strawberry pie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that strawberry pie (example pictured) is one of the "red foods" traditionally served at Juneteenth celebrations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Strawberry pie. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Strawberry pie), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Railway with a Heart of Gold

Hi - thanks for the review. Yes, the film is often played in the shop and cafe at the Railway, but I doubt there's any RS I could add to support that. John Snell does appear in the film - he was Driving No. 3 at the time of the derailment, and is sourced in Fuller, but at present John Snell doesn't have an article. John Bate, who later became the railway's chief engineer, also appears (they also serve who stand and bash things with hammers). Incredibly John Bate is still occasionally active on the railway. Neither of these characters have articles yet, though they should be notable enough, but I'll add them into the article as redlinks. Hope you enjoy the film! — Voice of Clam 10:08, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Voice of Clam: I just thought it was nice that The Times (25 February 2014) actually mentions Snell's appearance in the film as well: "He even took part in the film Railway with a Heart of Gold during the sequence where locomotive No. 3 is derailed. The Talyllyn and that incident were the inspiration for the hugely successful 1953 Ealing comedy The Titfield Thunderbolt." Cielquiparle (talk) 10:16, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

Fairies dangling on and frolicking around flowers	Seasons greetings!
Fairies dangling on and frolicking around flowers	Wishing you joyous holiday spirits, Cielquiparle! and best wishes for the New Year	Illustration of dancing fairies, 1914, taken from the poem “A Spell for a Fairy,” by Alfred Noyes

Beccaynr (talk) 03:41, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Beccaynr! All the best to you too. (Love the image on the right, reminds me of the etchings of Cleo Damianakes...) Cielquiparle (talk) 15:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

100 Women BBC 2022

This article needs established editor to be created Draft:Gehad Hamdy 196.153.62.147 (talk) 18:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a reviewer, but on first glance, it looks ok, so hopefully it will get accepted sooner rather than later. Good luck! Cielquiparle (talk) 19:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for PEI Architects

On 23 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article PEI Architects, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that I. M. Pei said that his sons' architecture firm "came of age" while designing the Bank of China head office (pictured) in Beijing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PEI Architects. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, PEI Architects), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Season's greetings

		Happy Christmas
		Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and best wishes for the New Year! Thank you for all you do. Whispyhistory (talk) 16:56, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Whispyhistory, you are such an inspiration! Wish you all the best for the holidays as well. Cielquiparle (talk) 17:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 17:31, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Bruxton. All the best to you too! Cielquiparle (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ann Howard (author)

On 27 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ann Howard (author), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that author Ann Howard interviewed more than 100 Australians about their experiences as child evacuees sent inland during World War II when a Japanese invasion seemed imminent? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ann Howard (author). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ann Howard (author)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Good work with prep 6 - it is time consuming. The quirky hook is a good one too! I wanted to ask if you would copyedit this article for me. I often miss my own mistakes. There was a DYK reviewer concern that I need to address. Bruxton (talk) 15:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruxton I've now proofread. Not sure what gaps the reviewer was referring to, but maybe he means the gap between ~1912 and 1978? And/or post-1978 to present? If you can find any more info about the history of the reservoir and/or recent developments, it would probably help. Another thing I wondered was whether "Fort Casino" needs to be higher up (mentioned in the lede and/or bolded), if someone is looking for the history of Fort Casino and this is the main page. (Yes, that quirky hook is a winner!) Cielquiparle (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help. I thought it would be an easy one to DYK. Bruxton (talk) 15:56, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruxton Maybe you could rename the page to focus on "Collapse of the..." and reframe the lede slightly to make it clearer you're only focusing on the disaster? Cielquiparle (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [1]

[2] Not intended as an accurate phonetic representation of the whole word

[1]

[1]