User talk:Carigval.97

Proposed deletion of Paola Grandón

The article Paola Grandón has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article no longer has enough relevance or noteworthiness to receive an article. It's sources are weak, and it is lacking in information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cbauman1212 (talk) 19:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hola compatriota

Esperando se encuentre bien, primero que todo espero que le esté llendo increíble en sus estudios en la PUCV. En segundo lugar, revisé su artículo de Nicolás Ibáñez y me dí cuenta que tiene bastantes faltas gramaticales. Si quiere aceptar mi recomendación, instale la herramienta Grammarly como extensión de navegador, cuando escribo en inglés me sirve de gran manera y le avisa de todas las faltas que uno comete. Deseándole lo mejor, saluda, Felipe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fcarvajalbrown (talk • contribs) 17:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, Carigval.97. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mauro Olivi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't change articles of former players to say "<player> was" unless they are no longer alive. Robby.is.on (talk) 21:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Three more things:

Please don't change "1.70 m" to "{{Height|m=1.70}}", the template is deprecated.
Please don't add counts like "(1)" for honours. It goes against WP:FOOTY consensus. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Football/Players#Honours_and_achievements.
Please don't add "|2" to the {{reflist}} template like you did here. That's also deprecated.

Robby.is.on (talk) 21:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sergio Vargas (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercontinental Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Hi there - please ensure that you include reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. Giant Snowman 12:59, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Julio Moreyra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Godoy Cruz and Nueva Chicago

Gustavo Tejería (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cerrito

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Diego Ferreira (footballer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CA Fenix

Fernando Brandán (footballer, born 1980) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Central Córdoba

Héctor Arrigo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Central Córdoba

Matías García (footballer, born 1980) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Central Córdoba

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alan Arario, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Plate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi and thank you for your articles. I just wanted to remind you to cite sources when adding information, especially when it regards living people. These basic biographical data can usually be found on the official government's site, but it's best to cite them. – Thjarkur (talk) 21:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Universidad de Chile Center for Byzantine and Neohellenic Studies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Universidad de Chile Center for Byzantine and Neohellenic Studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universidad de Chile Center for Byzantine and Neohellenic Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 11:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Héctor Herrera Cajas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miguel Enríquez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Eduardo Cavieres

Hello, Carigval.97,

Thank you for creating Eduardo Cavieres.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 07:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Héctor Suazo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Héctor Suazo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Carigval.97

Thank you for creating Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso History Institute.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I wonder why this University Institute is not listed on List of universities in Chile

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 08:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Academics of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

A tag has been placed on Category:Academics of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Delete it, please. I couldn't move the article to «Category:Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso scholars» --Carigval.97

12:50 29 dic 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Carigval.97

Thank you for creating Claudio Elórtegui Gómez.

User:Joseywales1961, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Can you please add a note to the talk page stating if this page was translated from the Spanish Wikipedia

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 18:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Javier Iturriaga del Campo

Please provide a reference showing that he held a commission as a general, and the draft will be accepted. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2001 Cuarta División de Chile moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2001 Cuarta División de Chile, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cuarta División de Chile seasons

A tag has been placed on Category:Cuarta División de Chile seasons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miguel Jiménez (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matías Rodríguez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bryan Danesi

added a link pointing to Calama

Mario Desbordes

added a link pointing to Renovación Nacional

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Héctor Suazo has been accepted

Héctor Suazo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 08:39, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Javier Iturriaga del Campo

Hello, Carigval.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Javier Iturriaga del Campo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2001 Cuarta División de Chile

Hello, Carigval.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2001 Cuarta División de Chile, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jorge Sharp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Castro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Javier Serafini

The article Javier Serafini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG as well as WP:NFOOTY since the Chilean second division is not fully-pro.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Javier Serafini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javier Serafini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Serafini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JTtheOG (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2001 Cuarta División de Chile

Hello, Carigval.97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2001 Cuarta División de Chile".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. No problem, @Liz:. 13:48, 2 August (UTC)

Logos on infoboxes

Hello there. Please do not reinsert logos into infobox offices, as you have been repeatedly doing in all of your articles. I removed some but I've seen you've created more articles with the same issue. Please do not keep on doing it and please proceed to remove them. Kuatrero (talk) 20:46, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, @Kuatrero:. 16:48, 8 August 2021 (UTC; Concón, Chile)

Same thing brought up by @Kuatrero:. More new articles today with the logos. Por favor ya no los agregues. JTtheOG (talk) 00:40, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ahora definitivamente no lo haré. By the other hand, I don't know if would be necessary continue speaking english with you, @JTtheOG:. If you want I'll continue writing in English. 21:47, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lol pues probablemente deberíamos de hablar inglés en el Wikipedia inglés. Nomás quería conectar con mi hermano Latino. One last thing: use four consecutive tildes (~) at the end of your message to sign your name in discussions. Good job on your articles and good luck in the future. JTtheOG (talk) 02:09, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jajaja. Ok po, compadre. Ni un drama. Ha sido grato poder intercambiar palabras en nuestra (o al menos mí) lengua nativa. Lo importante es que son los artículos los que deben estar escritos en inglés independiente de lo que conversemos en la discusión. Well, now returning to speak in english: take it easy with logos. I won't put them. For example, I retired the Constitutional Convention logo in the draft article of Teresa Marinovic. To all this, I have considerably improved that draft (I don't created that article). I think that article shouldn't being still a draft, but if it has to improve it more: I've no problem. Carigval.97 (talk) 23:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stéphanie Alenda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CIDOB.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carol Bown

The article Carol Bown has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raúl Celis Montt

The article Raúl Celis Montt has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 20:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Members of the Constitutional Convention

Hello. Please do not call members of the Chilean Constitutional Convention, in their infoboxes, as "Constituent Conventional of the Republic of Chile", since it is gramatically wrong and it is accepted to call them "member of the Constitutional Convention". Also, the constituency (district) should be put in their own field, and not in the name of the office. I. E. "For 16th District" -> "|constituency = 16th District". Please correct them. I have done a couple but you have kept on making these errors despite that. Kind regards. --Bedivere (talk) 20:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as told above: please do not add logos of parties to infoboxes. Additionally, please do not overcrowd articles with references. There's no need to do that. I have found several articles with factual errors, you should have a clear look at references and improve them instead of just adding them without any meaningful content (prose, to be clear). --Bedivere (talk) 20:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not ignore talk page messages. You have created two new articles which incur in the same errors pointed above: "Constituent Conventional" et al. Please correct them. Your contributions are much appreciated, but I will have to report you if you do not concur. --Bedivere (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, take it easy. --Carigval; 20:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso History Institute scholars

A tag has been placed on Category:Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso History Institute scholars indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of El Líbero

The article El Líbero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable online newspaper

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bedivere (talk) 17:18, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of El Líbero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Líbero, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Líbero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Javier Iturriaga del Campo has been accepted

Javier Iturriaga del Campo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alejandro Sánchez (footballer, born 1986), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Córdoba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaiso

A tag has been placed on Category:Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaiso indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Constituent conventional"

Te lo escribo en español para que sea más fácil. No existe la expresión "constituent conventional" en inglés, es errónea, y por favor deja de usarla como lo has hecho en el artículo de Teresa Marinovic. Por favor usa la forma "member of the Constitutional Convention", que es correcto y de uso aceptado. --Bedivere (talk) 23:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, arreglado. Asimismo, he ido retirando paulatinamente los logos de ministerios o partidos políticos en otros artículos creados.

Greetings; 23:34, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Carigval.97 (talk) 02:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, olvidaba. Han habido otros artículos de convencionales donde he retirado esas frases erróneas. Sin embargo, y como ya dije, lo haré en forma paulatina. Ya no tengo el mismo tiempo que dispuse para crear el resto de artículos. Por ende, tomará tiempo. Si me pudieras ayudar en que fuera más rápida la corrección, yo encantado. Carigval.97 (talk) 02:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:University of Valparaíso lawyers

A tag has been placed on Category:University of Valparaíso lawyers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:56, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:University of Valparaíso scholars

A tag has been placed on Category:University of Valparaíso scholars indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:57, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vanessa Kaiser for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vanessa Kaiser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Kaiser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bedivere (talk) 15:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style

Hola, me fijé que has estado creando varios artículos recientemente, lo cual encuentro super bueno y agradezco, pero quería recordarte de WP:NOSOCIAL, MOS:DECORATION y MOS:OL. Normas que no has aplicado en tus nuevos artículos y que debieses tener en consideración. Gracias, AtomsRavelAz talk 19:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no hay problema. Carigval; 16:13 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karen Roco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constitución.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nivia Palma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nivia Palma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nivia Palma has been accepted

Nivia Palma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Movimiento Autonomista politicians

A tag has been placed on Category:Movimiento Autonomista politicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:54, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paulina Saball

Carigval.9, thanks for creating Paulina Saball. Are you planning to add references to this article, in particular, the two main body paragraphs? Wikipedia requires all assertions of fact to be verifiable, with citations to reliable sources; in addition, biographies of living persons have stricter sourcing requirements. Please return to this article, and add citations backing up the content you have added. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations to reliable sources are required

Hi again, Carigval.9. Thank you for your many contributions to Wikipedia. I was looking through some of the articles you've created, and there is a problem with insufficient citations in almost all of them. In particular, the following articles lack sufficient citations to reliable sources: Claudia Barattini, Carlos Furche, Máximo Pacheco Matte, Jaime Burrows, Ministry of National Assets (Chile), Ministry for the Environment (Chile), Pablo Badenier, Marcelo Díaz (Chilean politician), and many more.

You've been around for almost two years now, so you're no longer a newbie, and you should be aware of Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. If you haven't read the policies about this lately, please re-read them now, starting with: WP:Verifiability, WP:Reliable sources, and WP:Biographies of living persons.

In particular, per WP:Verifiability: Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed. (emphasis added). In many of your articles, this means that 50–90% of the content could be removed, because it is unsourced; in some cases of completely unreferenced articles, all the content you added could be removed.

What I would recommend to you, is to now stop creating new articles, and go back through the list of articles you have created and make sure that they are fully referenced by inclusion of citations to the content as needed; *especially* in the case of biographies of living persons. As a somewhat new editor, you get a certain amount of slack about this, but not forever. If you continue to create new articles, or expand existing ones without adding citations, it's possible that your editing privileges could be suspended. So, you don't want to go there. Please fix up your existing articles first, then you can resume creating articles as before.

(If you are having trouble reading long policies written in technical English, note that Spanish Wikipedia has similar articles here: es:WP:Verificabilidad, es:WP:Fuentes fiables, and es:WP:Biografías de personas vivas, but important note: these are not translations of the English policies, they are analogous, but different policies created by, and for, the members of Spanish Wikipedia, so you cannot rely on their content when editing English Wikipedia. You could, if you want, read the Spanish ones first, to get a general idea of what some of these basic principles are about, and an introduction to some of the jargon used, but note that while editing English Wikipedia, you must follow all policies and guidelines of English Wikipedia, which may be quite different than the ones at es-wiki; so make sure you read and follow WP:Verifiability, WP:Reliable sources, and WP:Biographies of living persons.)

If you have any questions, feel free to {{reply}} below (use {{Reply|Mathglot}}), or contact me at my Talk page any time. (En preferencia en ingles, p.f.; pero se puede escribir en esp. si haya algo que quieres decir que no sabes exprimir en ing.) Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Deputy of the Republic"

Hola Carlos. Por favor, cuando crees artículos sobre diputados, escribe "Member of the Chamber of Deputies of Chile" en vez de lo señalado en el título, ya que así se refiere a los diputados en inglés. Saludos. --Bedivere (talk) 22:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Salutes, CV.

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reynaldo Lacámara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linares.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Américo Acuña moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Américo Acuña, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 18:45, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Américo Acuña (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Américo Acuña may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Carigval.97! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 04:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Carigval.97, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- TNT (talk • she/they) 06:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Enrique Krauss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imperial.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Osorno

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Osorno indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jorge Bermúdez Soto

added a link pointing to ENAP

Mauricio Daza

added a link pointing to Penta

Ricardo Bravo Oliva

added a link pointing to Rodrigo González

Álvaro Salas

added a link pointing to TV+

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Américo Acuña has been accepted

Américo Acuña, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eduardo Simián

Hi. Thanks for your work on expanding Eduardo Simián's article! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pamela Hodar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pamela Hodar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:41, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eduardo Vio Grossi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eduardo Vio Grossi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Tromben moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carlos Tromben, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sebastián Valenzuela Agüero moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sebastián Valenzuela Agüero, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:48, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Le-Bert moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Luis Le-Bert, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fabio Vio moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fabio Vio, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Carlos Tromben has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carlos Tromben. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Tromben (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too much of the content is unreferenced — where is this information coming from? Eg. what source supports his DOB or education? Please see WP:BLP for how to reference articles on living people. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carlos Tromben and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Carlos Tromben, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Marcelo Schilling. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Arjayay (talk). 18:19 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Tromben has been accepted

Carlos Tromben, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 18:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fabio Vio has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fabio Vio. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 19:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fabio Vio has been accepted

Fabio Vio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamela Hodar (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Most Comfortable Chair was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pamela Hodar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pamela Hodar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— The Most Comfortable Chair 20:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eduardo Vio Grossi

Hello, Carigval.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eduardo Vio Grossi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sebastián Valenzuela Agüero

Hello, Carigval.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sebastián Valenzuela Agüero, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Luis Le-Bert

Hello, Carigval.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luis Le-Bert, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sebastián Valenzuela Agüero

Hello, Carigval.97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sebastián Valenzuela Agüero".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Supporters by football clubs in Chile has been nominated for deletion

Category:Supporters by football clubs in Chile has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pamela Hodar

Hello, Carigval.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pamela Hodar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Andrés Bello National University scholars

A tag has been placed on Category:Andrés Bello National University scholars indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:University for the Arts, Sciences, and Communication alumni

A tag has been placed on Category:University for the Arts, Sciences, and Communication alumni indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OVERLINKING

Hi, thanks for your work. Please avoid linking common terms (and dates, centuries, years, etc) Tony (talk) 03:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pamela Hodar

Hello, Carigval.97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pamela Hodar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Carigval.97. Thank you for your work on Jorge Soria. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! One more sources should be added on the article, is it possible for you to add that?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 20:31, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of María José Cumplido for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article María José Cumplido is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María José Cumplido until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 04:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eduardo Vio Grossi

Hello, Carigval.97. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eduardo Vio Grossi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tomás Vodanovic moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tomás Vodanovic, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tomás Vodanovic

Hello, Carigval.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tomás Vodanovic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gabriel Alemparte for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Alemparte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Alemparte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bedivere (talk) 04:03, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Gabriel Alemparte, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 20:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence User talk:Guariflor. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Carigval.97 reported by User:Bedivere (Result: ). Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CAN

Good evening, I have been observing that you are inviting several users to vote in favor within a deletion request. That is clear cavassing and can be reported for it. Give up on those intentions and focus on defending the article, without invoking more users in your campaign. It will be the only warning. Taichi (talk) 23:50, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Taichi: I already warned the user (see above). I don't see any canvassing since my warning.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I won't do any canvassing. It's a compromise.-- Carigval.97 (talk) 01:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Compromise? What does that mean? --Bbb23 (talk) 01:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, commitment. I got confused with my language (Spanish). Carigval.97 (talk) 01:41, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, my commitment: I won't do more canvassing. Carigval.97 (talk) 01:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Javier Serafini

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Javier Serafini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javier Serafini. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Carigval.97. Thank you for your work on Carlos Bianchi Chelech. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consejeros y otros artículos

Hola. Veo que has creado varios artículos en los que dices erróneamente que los biografiados tienen un "BA". Sin embargo, en Chile no hay bachelor's degree, sino licenciaturas, que debes poner como Lic.. Saludos. Bedivere (talk) 04:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Carigval.97 (talk) 15:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Félix Galleguillos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Carigval.97. Thank you for your work on Carolina Arredondo. Chaotic Enby, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Passed NPOL, good job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 19:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Felipe Bulnes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlos Maldonado and Harald Beyer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Carigval.97. Thank you for your work on List of Members of the Constitutional Council (Chile, 2023). MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

the representatives for the biobio region don't match with one of the refs

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Carigval.97!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Rodolfo Carter

Hello Carigval.97, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rodolfo Carter, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodolfo Carter.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:34, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Commons (political party) politicians

A tag has been placed on Category:Commons (political party) politicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:59, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso Students Federation

The article Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso Students Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources, only a dead external link. No indication of meeting WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:46, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]