Jump to content

User talk:AngusWOOF/Archive 20

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15←Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22→Archive 25

Draft:PRIBET GROUP OF COMPANIES

The above mentioned draft was rejected by you for sources not being reliable. Please kindly check the following Link sources for me if they can help get my article published. Could you kindly work with me to get my draft published.

1.http://jornalnopintcha.gw/2020/06/15/pribet-group-promete-criar-cinco-mil-novos-postos-de-emprego-no-pais/

2. http://capgb.com/representante-de-carpower-podemos-fornecer-energia-electrica-para-toda-a-guine-bissau/

3. Reporter Africa - 1st Edition 20 Apr. 2020 | season 11 forward video to the 15:24 https://www.rtp.pt/play/p6580/e467990/reporter-africa-1-edicao

Please let me know so that I can make changes and re-submit. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manpolito (talk • contribs) 03:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Manpolito, are these mainstream newspapers in the country? Capgb.com doesn't look like a major news article but a blog. Rádio e Televisão de Portugal (RTP) looks promising. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Please read WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:RSP for sources that would help. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 04:29, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 : AngusWOOF, Thanks for the feedback. 1.http://jornalnopintcha.gw/2020/06/15/pribet-group-promete-criar-cinco-mil-novos-postos-de-emprego-no-pais/  and 2. http://capgb.com/representante-de-carpower-podemos-fornecer-energia-electrica-para-toda-a-guine-bissau/    are mainstream newspapers in the Country (Guinea Bissau).   3.  https://thechronicle.com.gh/ghanaian-managing-power-supply-in-guinea-bissau/ is also a mainstream newspapers in Ghana.  I also came across this source also https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/Travelling-abroad-does-not-guarantee-success-Youth-advised-1006492
  Please I need your advise. Thank You. Manpolito (talk) 05:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Manpolito, please read WP:NCORP and clear out any unsupported/unsourced statements. Some of section headers such as Branches, Staff Strength, and corporate sounding website sections should be removed. Staff strength statements such as the turnover rates are unsupported. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF,please thanks very much for your help so far. I had made the changes you advised, kindly check for me if I can resumit it now for publishing. Will be waiting on your feedback. Thanks for your support. Manpolito (talk) 06:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Manpolito, please disclose whether you are connected to this organization in any manner. There are statements in the draft that are still unsupported and seem to be written by someone in their PR department. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF, please am not related or connected to the organization.Just came across this organization in the news and from the story of how the whole organization got started by a young man from my country(Ghana) in another country in Africa (Guinea Bissau) after his search of greener pasture in Europe failed, got me interested in finding more about it; as it is a source of encouragement for up coming youth of my continent. Thus why am trying to put his work out there for my first publish. Thanks Manpolito (talk) 02:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF, please am waiting on your feedback. Thanks [

[User:Manpolito|Manpolito]] (talk) 00:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Manpolito, it still has some statements that are unsupported and read like opinions on the company. Stuff like "As a result, the company is always up to date on International Building Technology and Business Strategies." or "The group annually invests in staff capacity development" Can you remove those or neutralize them, or cite them to references? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:54, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Manpolito, after fixing it, if you'd like others to take a look you can resubmit it. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF,please thanks very much for your help so far. I will do as advised. Manpolito (talk) 00:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF,please I had done as you said and had re-submitted it. Kindly check it for me please. Thanks Manpolito (talk) 01:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF,please I had done as you said and had re-submitted it.Please it had been a long time, Kindly check it for me please. Thanks Manpolito (talk) 03:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Manpolito, any of the AFC reviewers can check it over. it doesn't have to be me. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF,OKAY THANKS. Please it had been a long time,so how can I get them to check for me please advice me. Kindly help me out please. THANKS. Manpolito (talk) 23:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Justin Picard

Hi there. I don't mean to impose, but would you be willing to have a look at this draft? A review's been pending for 2 months and the backlog hasn't shown any signs of being reduced significantly in that time. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 06:13, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Davykamanzi, any of the AFC reviewers can check it over. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Question

Is hanja in Korean REALLY as official as kanji is to the Japanese language if we’re talking about Chinese characters/hànzí?

72.68.2.144 (talk) 08:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Well, kanji is used as an actual part of language for the Japanese language, and I read a lot of K-pop lyrics in Korean with the characters and none of them are hanja, only Hangul. So wouldn't I be curious about that? Also, on Google Translate, they only use official Korean characters, and so hanja are not official Korean characters or even real Korean characters; only Hangul are Korean characters. Do you understand now?
--72.68.2.144 (talk) 17:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
72.68.2.144, why is this an issue? Go read MOS:KOREA on the Hangul and Hanja section. That's the format Wikipedia is using. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bagh Bandi Khela

Draft:Bagh Bandi Khela resubmitted --Shashanka Chandra Das 02:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bagh Bandi Khela resubmitted--Shashanka Chandra Das 03:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Shashanka Chandra Das, please see the comments in the draft article. It needs a lot of fixes before resubmitting. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:34, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Divya Agarwal

Sir if you remember I had created the draft for this article and you had helped me with the editing. This article was protected to prevent vandalism but someone has removed it and unnecessary edits were made(though they have been reverted back) . If you could look into why the protection was removed, it will be a great help. Thank you Minishaliper (talk) 14:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Minishaliper, the protection was removed because it had expired. If the vandalism happens again we can raise it up on WP:RFPP again. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok....thank you for your help Minishaliper (talk) 16:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Sir I have been told that the article Divya Agarwal is not properly sourced so I have made a few changes. Kindly preview if anymore changes are needed.Also please check the talk page of article for more details. Thank you Minishaliper (talk) 14:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Minishaliper, my version is properly sourced. It's the IP's version that contains a number of bad sources per WP:RSP. Please do not edit it off of that IP's version. Discuss at the talk page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok...maybe that's why others were telling that it isn't properly sourced. I was considering it your version. Thank you Minishaliper (talk) 14:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Give your opinion

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:West_Block_Blues#Merge_Request. One similiar article without any GNG is also under discussion for merging. So you can tell your opinion there also. Thankyou Shahoodu (talk) 18:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Shahoodu, it looks like there's consensus to merge. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello :)

I'm new to this and was wondering if you could give me some pointers please, this is the page i tried to publish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Petal_Card#Petal_Card_%28Credit_Card%29

I looked at sources again and they seem to be ok to me, could you please point me to the right direction, how to improve this to get published?

Any help is appreciated.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louisalexandre2 (talk • contribs) 07:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Louisalexandre2, Crunchbase is not a reliable source per WP:RSP. And the Fintech Extra is questionable as well. Please find other external news sources that go in depth on the company. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 10:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the draft maharashtra students welfare association

Hello Sir/ Madam Again I Submitted the draft please check I am not getting why my draft is being rejected and again. More reliable sources are added this time and also category is also changed as per your comment. I am new to WP please help me with the draft so that it can be published to main space Thank you sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publicspeaker2020 (talk • contribs) 16:38, 28 October 2020‎ (UTC)

Publicspeaker2020, you need to reference sources that cover the organization in detail. See WP:ORGCRIT. You need at least 2 detailed news sources independent of the subject. Having the organization mentioned in a news article in a single line from the speaker is routine news coverage and does not help establish notability. Also if you are connected to the organization in any way (member, friend of a friend, etc.) you need to disclose that as it is a conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Publicspeaker2020, the draft needs more historical background. if the organization was established mainly for Pune University you should discuss that. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publicspeaker2020 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello Sir/Madam As we discussed earlier I had created a detail draft with more accurate sources containing the subject and also added the historical background of the subject as discussed before please have a look Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publicspeaker2020 (talk • contribs) 05:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Publicspeaker2020, the history section needs to be sourced. You haven't added any news articles that focus on the organization itself.
Also please read WP:COI and disclose if you are connected to the organization in any way. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)


Hello Sir/Madam I had added new reference to the draft which justify the subject in a proper manner as you suggested also I don't have any connection with this organization in any way. I just found one genuine subject to wright so I am working on this draft. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publicspeaker2020 (talk • contribs) 06:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello Sir/Madam I had added new reference to the draft which justify the subject in a proper manner as you suggested also I don't have any connection with this organization in any way. I just found one genuine subject to wright so I am working on this draft. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Publicspeaker2020 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Streetsound

hey there

so i've been working away at my article so a while now - just wondering if you could keep me some feedback since you first reviewed it? i've paired it back a lot and added many more citations.. Its been awaiting 2nd review for a while - but i thought maybe you could flag anything that still looked weak. thanks! Chris Torella (talk) 17:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Confetti (Little Mix album)

I have a question, when is the Confetti page going to be available for everyone?? It has enough information and I think that still having a draft page of it is no longer necessary. Thank you. Mikezarco (talk) 18:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Mikezarco, when it's got sourced album reviews and charting, then it should be ready. I've been trying to tell people that for over a month now. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

ok, fine :) Mikezarco (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Removing redirect and making levidrome its own page.

Hi AngusWOOF.

I noticed you reverted the changes to the Levidrome page, and redirected the page to Palindromes.

A levidrome is similar to a palindrome, but different.

It is derived from a palindrome, but has a different criteria...ie. a word with a different definition when the spelling is reversed. As such, it is a different topic, with a different history than palindromes. It would make sense to give it its own page because all the history and references are unique to a levidrome, not palindrome.

There is even a website, [1] which hilites both levidromes and palindromes, and shows the differences between the two.

Thanks. For you consideration.

Al — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.200.7.34 (talk • contribs) 20:12, 3 November 2020‎ (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://www.levidromelist.com

Al, there is already a detailed section about reverse palindromes in the palindrome section. It doesn't need to be spun out. The term "levidrome" is no more notable than any of the other example terms proposed. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Request on 10:02:46, 1 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Fidan160



Fidan160 (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Good Day! Many thanks for reviewing my page and leaving your feedback.

I would opt for editing the existing page, was thinking about it. But would it be possible to change the title of the page too?

As I've mentioned in my request, the current title of the article mirrors the title of the official document adopted by the Chinese government <https://www.bayarea.gov.hk/en/outline/plan.html>. But the overwhelming body of international analysis on this region uses the term "Greater Bay Area" (please see all my external links for the article). Thanks a lot and kind regards! Fidan160 (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Fidan160, you can propose moving it at WP:RFD. I just want to make sure it has consensus. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 12:14, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I am still very inept when it comes to technical details of work with Wikipedia. I've nominated my redirect page for discussion, hope it worked. If not, would be very grateful for your help! Fidan160 (talk) 08:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Fidan160, please read WP:COI and declare as that article and the Huangpu District you are working as an employee of those. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi! All personal information is on my user page. Main reasons to edit the article:

- The heading of the current article mirrors the name of the official Chinese document, whereas the body of international analysis (see list of external links of Greater Bay Article in my sandbox) uses term "Greater Bay Area".

- most figures are outdated and information is incomplete

- most of the external links do not work properly.

Thanks for your feedback! Fidan160 (talk) 09:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Fidan160, I know the Chinese use that term in their press, but there are other Bay Areas that use Greater Bay Area term, so it would have to be argued whether it is primary topic or not. That's what needs discussion in an RFD. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Sure, I thought I have nominated it for discussion in RFD. How should I proceed now? Thanks!Fidan160 (talk) 07:35, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:WRBD

Please discuss with me and User:FloridaArmy on the draft talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi

Hi , I was wondering what is that I can do to improve my articl help would be much appreciated thank you Graciano major (talk) 23:11, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

You need to show that it meets WP:MUSICBIO. Just because you have worked with notable people doesn't give you independent notability. Also the tone is strongly promotional and is in the process of being deleted. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

DR Gaming Technology: Article Draft

Morning and thanks for re-reviewing my draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:DR_Gaming_Technology

The information I supplied was very much in line with the 'opening information' of similar companies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Game_Technology, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Games, and as such, I based my style of writing and content on these articles. Is the challenge I now face writing in a less formal style, as well as the references I used as initially commented on by Blablubbs? Or are the references now adequate, and I need only review the copy style? I'd appreciate your comments. Thanks MagicDunc (talk) 07:43, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

(summoned by the mention) MagicDunc, I forgot to ask you after reviewing your draft, so I'll do it here: Do you have any connection to DR Gaming Technology? Best, Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 12:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Blablubbs I do, and I know I need to share that, but I am not sure how or where to reflect it. Can you direct me please? I'd also appreciate your comments iro the actual content as referred to by AngusWOOF MagicDunc (talk) 13:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

MagicDunc, You can read our policy on paid contribution disclosure at WP:PAID; please do not edit further until you have complied with it. I will leave the substantive comments to AngusWoof for now because I'm busy with something else, but I might be able to chip in later. PS: I have also taken the liberty to fix your message formatting for better readability; to ping people, please use the {{reply to}} or {{User link}} templates instead of copying their signatures (in the case of mine, the copying led to your entire subsequent message being rendered in superscript). Thanks and best, Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 13:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
MagicDunc, it needs external news articles that show independent notability. The articles should not be referenced to press releases or website. The TM symbol and similar verbiage needs to be removed as that is a major flag for blatant advertising WP:IBA. Please read WP:NCORP and check that your sources meet those. At this point there are just a few statements and it doesn't show how the company is any more notable than the business down the street or how it is significant in the industry. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

We Need to Do Something Draft

Hello! You recently declined my draft for the article We Need to Do Something (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:We_Need_to_Do_Something) on the basis that there weren't enough sources and with the claim that there was no information the movie had even filmed. As a newly announced movie, by its very nature, the sources would be limited, but the two cited-- The Hollywood Reporter and Bloody Disgusting are both major entertainment sites with solid credibility on the announcement and documentation of new, recently completed films; and, additionally, the Bloody Disgusting article actively discusses the making of the film. I feel that this was an oversight in the review process and would encourage you to re-review the sources cited and read the sources themselves for verifiability. Thank you for your consideration!Captbloodrock (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Captbloodrock, do the sources show that filming has commenced / completed? See WP:NFF AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Captbloodrock, can you write in a production section that describes the filming locations and that principal photography has completed? You can reference Bloody Disgusting and The Hollywood Reporter. I think that would help show that it passes NFF. The production section can also go into better detail on the casting of the actors and the director/screenplayer's thoughts. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:13, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Done! Captbloodrock (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Captbloodrock, I resubmitted it under your name and approved. Thanks for getting those sources and writeups in there. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Confetti Draft

Hey Angus. It’s Doggy54321. Re this edit, can you give an example or two of stuff that should be in the reception tab? I’m a little confused as to what you mean? Please ping me when you respond. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 18:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

D🐶ggy54321, anything written by critics for the purpose of reviewing the album's tracks can go in reception. For example: "the perfect balance between melodic pop sugar rush and sonic invention" is more of an opinion than a fact/analysis. If that was described from a critic, it goes in reception. If it's from the producer/songwriter/member then it can stay in composition. Those phrases should be supported by the writers, for example: Alexis Petridis of The Guardian called the song "the perfect balance between melodic pop sugar rush and sonic invention". Also if you have reviewers of the entire album, those should go in Reception now that the album is released. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Ok thanks! I’ll make these changes now. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 21:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
It looks like it's in mainspace now. Congrats! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Can you read again the draft AHEAD?--Wir sind das volk 2021 (talk) 18:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Wir sind das volk 2021, regarding Draft:Ahead (munition) this needs more notability independent from the manufacturer. Otherwise it should redirect to the manufacturer or the primary product it is used in. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The article is perfect and is in other languages. Enter it in wikipedia immediately please. --Wir sind das volk 2021 (talk) 21:08, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Wir sind das volk 2021, it's not perfect. You need to reference the other sections not just the acronym. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

It´s perfect now?--Wir sind das volk 2021 (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Wir sind das volk 2021, no, you need to explain how it is notable separate from the company that makes it. You need to present news articles that focus on the munition itself and reviews its details, and they have to come from a secondary source independent of the subject. See WP:GNG AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

IF YOU ARE A GOOD DOG, YOU MUST TO HELP ME WITH THE DRAFT IS PERFECT.--Wir sind das volk 2021 (talk) 22:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Wir sind das volk 2021, fix it up yourself. See WP:GNG on what kinds of references would help show that the munition is indepdendently notable from the company, otherwise it's just going to redirect to the company as a product. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your work at AfC

I appreciate your work reviewing new articles at AfC, and I confess I'm not clear on the etiquette as an experienced editor of whether to re-submit an article after I've added sources or to just move it to main space myself? At any rate, please take another look at Draft:Johnston County Career and Technical Leadership Academy when it comes up in your queue. Thanks! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 04:40, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Grand'mere Eugene, if you believe it now meets WP:ORG and have no COI association with it, then you can accept it yourself as a veteran editor using the WP:AFCH tool. I prefer to use AFCH so it leaves a trail that it was approved by an AFC reviewer instead of directly moved by the editor of interest. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:24, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Grand'mere Eugene, it looks like you went ahead and moved it directly to mainspace. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, yes, I'm still waiting for permission to use AFCH, but there is a slight backlog. Meanwhille, I had uploaded the school's logo, but forgot the requirement that the logo had to be used in article space, not draft, so the logo was running into the deadline to be deleted. To save the logo upload, I just moved the article to main space. Not elegant, but it worked. I promise to use the AFCH softwre next time. Thanks for again for your help. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Request on 00:08:24, 6 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Tefmann


Tefmann (talk) 00:08, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

LukeAFK submission

You said it was declined because the direct source to his followings on YouTube and Socialblade were not adequate. Where else would I get more accurate results than the sources themselves? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tefmann (talk • contribs) 00:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Tefmann, try mainstream newspapers. Compare with Joseph Garrett, Jazza (YouTuber), DanTDM. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Sarah Smarsh again

She's published another book and there've been a few more posts about her. I revived the draft and brushed it up a bit, improving some of the existing cites.

Opinion on whether it's worth resubmitting?

Work was worth doing anyway, she's eventually going to edge into notable status and it's easier to update this in real-time as I notice things happening. Tim Bray (talk) 16:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Tim Bray, you could resubmit it. With a second book out that has national press, that would help her notability separate from the first book. The statement about running for senate isn't that clear though. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Agreed on the senate thing. Took it out. Will resubmit. Thanks! Tim Bray (talk) 05:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Tim Bray, looks like the article is live now. Congrats! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Very educational experience for me, thanks to all who helped. Tim Bray (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Lolli (company)

Hi AngusWOOF! You edited this page a while back https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lolli_(company) and I was wondering if you could help me out. The company has been covered by many different mainstream sources (WSJ, CNN, NSNBC, etc) and I added some more sourcing. However, I can't publish the page for some reason. Would you know how to publish/are these source switches better in your opinion? I kept the page brief despite having lots more coverage available because I read it's better to add piece pages together slowly. Thanks for the help WaltJsmith (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

WaltJsmith, I can resubmit it to AFC and see if others are willing to look at your sources. Do you have three external ones of them that detail the company in depth that you can list on the talk page, per WP:THREE? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF I added three sources that were solid as well as some video coverage on network tv (wasn't sure if this is counted as a source so I added it after). Again, thanks for your help. And hopefully, it goes through AFC finally! WaltJsmith (talk) 20:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


AngusWOOF Just wanted to check-in; I made the edits you suggested. Do I now just wait for the review process to take place? I can edit it and add more if needed. Thanks! WaltJsmith (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Vaibhav Edke Draft

Hello Sie / Madam Sir I had submitted the notable references with article draft although the draft is deleted what's and issue and also I don't have any connection with the person I found a new person who should be notable as he have sufficient references. Please tell me what else you need in the draft so that I can resubmit it again Shoud I add more refrences to the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshayzade2020 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Sir Please Check New Refrences added as per your suggestion

Akshayzade2020, see WP:BASIC. You need three external news articles that cover his life and career specifically. Also the organization he is involved with needs to meet notability. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Sir Please Check New Refrences added as per your suggestion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshayzade2020 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Akshayzade2020, I suggest you put in your thoughts and references on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maharashtra Students Welfare Association to show whether that organization is notable. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft: The Goblin Club

Hi Angus, Thanks for taking the time to look at my Draft page (Draft:The Goblin Club).

You originally rejected it for not having enough external news sources, I have now added 5 new sources and some extra details, let me know if this seems okay.

Have a good day! :)

Thank you!

Gobbo123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobbo123 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Gobbo123, can you find references outside of the Oxford area? How is it separately notable from other student clubs? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi AngusWOOF, thanks for the feedback, I added in 2 more sources, including one from The Financial Times. I hope this is okay!Gobbo123 21:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi again AngusWOOF, I've made a few further edits and removed unreliable sources, let me know if this is good enough? Thanks,Gobbo123

Request on 01:37:44, 11 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Seektofind1


DRAFT Commander Fr. Joseph N. Moody Would like assistance to write a biography, that is common for most famous celebrities and historic figures on Wiki. Joe Moody died 26 years ago so this was not intended to be an obituary or memorial. Fr. Joe Moody had a great impact on religion, punished material,(even credited on wiki)in broadcast and military history. The intent is to create a biography of a truly historic figure. Can you assist how this can be written without the intention as a memorial? Thanks!

Seektofind1 (talk) 01:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Seektofind1, you need to find more external news articles that cover the person's career and life. Also try to write the article without referring to the person with honorifics and flowery language. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Can you review Draft:CyberLab

Can you take a look at my Draft:CyberLab, I have revised and added reliable sources that follow wiki requirements. 2601:803:7F:9680:8089:44C8:9873:A8F2 (talk) 17:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

2601:803:7F:9680:8089:44C8:9873:A8F2, it still lacks external news sources. 2 of the references are press releases (businesswire, prnewswire) so they are primary sources. Same with the CSC newsletters. You need external coverage. More importantly, you need to show how this organization is notable independent of IUPUI otherwise it might as well be a section in the IUPUI article. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I added additional sources to the page, can you let me know what you think of those? Can you give me any pointers to have this page approved? I understand the notability aspect, and am trying to provide the information to show that? Do you have any suggestion on what I could add to show that the CyberLab is notably independent? I really appreciate you help. XxCNxxCL (talk) 19:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Timothy Westbrook II draft

What do I have to fix about it cause you said it read like an advertisement. DeficientFaith (talk) 00:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

DeficientFaith, you need to rewrite it so it doesn't sound like he is selling his services and skills. More importantly, you need more external news sources that cover his career. Coverage in local and national newspapers or magazines. If he has charted on Billboard, this should be noted as well. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Marco Mendess

Hi Angus, thanks for your work on my article. It's the first time I've ever tried to contribute here, so it's really important for me to learn what's wrong.I just try to put smaller but specific artists on Wikipedia (those about whom there are not tons of information everywhere), but who have done important and interesting things in their time. Can you please specify exactly what is completely wrong and what should I replace to make the article public? I understand from the rules I have read for articles about artists that they must: 1) have released two albums under the major or independent record company. In this case there are 3 albums. The first published under the most important historical record company of the Czech Republic (Supraphone - Popron) and two others for the independent record company, maybe the most important in the glam rock sector ( Perris Records ). 2) there have been two books written about this artist, one released under the Feltrinelli publishing house in Italy - I think among the largest publishing Italian house. 3) how can I prove the rotation of songs on the radio? Through profiles on the radio web? Or the appearances on TV - through the videos recorded by the broadcast on YT? 4) how can I prove articles in newspapers and magazines that were only in the "analog" version? My final question is: do you think it is possible to make this draft public ( and than similar articles ) and do you think it makes sense, or I'm just wasting my time ... Thanks and greets from Serbia! Darkoglam (talk) 11:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


Darkoglam, ok I will try to feed back some ideas:
  • You can refer to newspapers and magazines. They don't have to be online although if they have an online presence, it's easier to look up the article as a reference, especially if the musician was active during the Internet era, which he is. Bravewords.com should be okay to use as it refers to Brave Words & Bloody Knuckles.
  • Regarding charting, I wanted to see if there was charting by the band in notable music charts WP:CHARTS such as IFPI, Billboard, Fimi, Ultratop, etc.
  • Is Supraphone Popron the same as Supraphon?
  • Please remove the embedded links from the article, for example, Night Club 666
  • Do not reference discogs.com or goodreads.com. See WP:RSP for a list of acceptable sources.
  • You can link to Feltrinelli (publisher) if that's the same publisher
  • Appearances on television can be cited by {{cite AV media}} or {{cite episode}} but if they have newspaper coverage of their appearance on television or radio, that would be more helpful.
  • You can put some of your comments on specifically how the artist meets WP:NMUSIC on the talk page and other AFC reviewers can take a look and give you more feedback. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)


Hi Angus, really thanks for your help and for your patience. I hope I begin to orient myself a little here. I tried to make some changes you suggested. What do you think now? Still a disaster? Darkoglam (talk) 18:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Question regarding your review of the submitted article "Behavioral Public Administration"

Dear AngusWoof

Thank you for taking the time to review my submitted article "Behavioral Public Administration". In regards to the comment, you left ("This is mostly extensions from the Administrative Behavior book and article."), I hope you don't mind me making a point of disagreement in order to ask you a few follow-up questions:

In my view, Behavioral Public Administration (BPA) is an academic subfield, rather than an extension of the points and arguments made by Herbert Simon in the book you refer to (Administrative Behavior). This view is based on the fact that BPA has a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to covering and relaying research solely performed within this field of study (Journal of Behavioral Public Administration). I realize that the field is influenced by, and draws on, the points and arguments put forward by (among others) Herbert Simon, but I would argue that the same can be said of related fields of study such as Public Administration, which relies on thoughts and arguments put forwards by Paul H. Appleby and Woodrow Wilson (among others), or Behavioral Economics which was highly influenced by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman (among others). My point here is, that while early influences are widely influential (pardon the pun) in shaping an academic field of study, they are not synonymous with the field of study.

So, my questions are as follows: 1) Do you disagree with the abovementioned point of distinction between Herbert Simon's book "Administrative Behavior" and the field of BPA? 2) If you agree that they indeed are two different phenomena, and thus deserve separate Wikipedia articles, what advice could you give me on how to make that distinction more evident throughout the article?

Again, thank you for taking the time to review my article, and hopefully answer the questions above.

Best regards, Mikkel Meinert MikkelMeinert (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikkelMeinert (talk • contribs) 15:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Mikkel Meinert, you'll have to explain how it was established as as subfield, what year and by what organizations / people, and how AB is also just a subset of the field. If it's mainly from AB as a starting point, then it should be merged with AB. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the swift response. That makes sense, I will do so. Thanks again. MikkelMeinert (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikkelMeinert (talk • contribs) 16:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear AngusWOOF Would you mind taking a look at the draft again with the latest edits, and consider it for creation again? Any feedback would be very much appreciated. MikkelMeinert (talk) 04:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Diego Masi (Artist)

Hello, AngusWOOF. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Diego Masi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Liz, thanks, this was a courtesy page move of a draft, so I'm okay with deletion and if the original editor wants it back with a refund. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Userfied Draft:Besieged Leningrad

AngusWOOF, I've userfied Draft:Besieged Leningrad to User:Taaaaaaaaangro/Besieged Leningrad per your request at the RMT. Thank you! ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Pokemon Home notability

I am curious why you think Pokemon Home is not notable. There is plenty of evidence that it is. See also:

There needs not be a discussion on a split, since it's clearly independently notable and passes WP:GNG. Your response?ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

ZXCVBNM, okay, I will resubmit it and let then CSD G6 go through. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
@AngusWOOF: Thank you, I will approve it once the current page is removed.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Request on 02:52:50, 19 November 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by PXAO


Hello! I believe this page is reasonable to be given its own Wikipedia page because it represents a business partially owned by Danny Green but otherwise independent of him in that they perform interviews and host events without Green! I agree it may make sense to add some information about it in Green's Wikipedia page, however the company itself is run by a variety of people! Perhaps more information about the company itself would make it more acceptable?

Thank you!

PXAO (talk) 02:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

PXAO, it still needs to show notability outside of Green. Look at The Mary Sue; that one is Abrams' organization and is independent yet doesn't have its own article. If the perception of the organization is that it's mainly Green's podcast, it's harder to split out. The references you are using at the moment show that it's mainly his podcast. You'll need more references that focus on the program itself over who co-founded it. See also Talk is Jericho, which is a section in Chris Jericho's article. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:CyberLab Can you help me out?

Can you please give me feedback and criticism on my draft. How can I display notability? I need to find more news articles I do know that, but what else can I do? Feedback on anything else would be great. Thank you!2601:803:7F:9680:8844:1BBD:51F6:9229 (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

2601:803:7F:9680:8844:1BBD:51F6:9229, you need sources outside the university setting (no university newspapers or newsletters) that discuss the lab in detail. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

A quick question does that mean none of my sources can be newsletters from the university, all must be sources outside of the university setting? Thanks in advance.XxCNxxCL (talk) 18:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

XxCNxxCL see WP:ORGCRIT and WP:PRIMARY; they should be independent of the subject for notability establishing purposes. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Nosferatu (band)

Just an update Johnny Alucard is at it again deleting entries to suit his agenda. I would appreciate somebody stepping in as otherwise it will go round and round again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladjanicek66 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 17 November 2020‎ (UTC)

 Done restored it back to a version that doesn't have his edits. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

And so it goes on, Johnny Alucard has changed it back again. This will go on and on. Vladjanicek66 21:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

All details taken from the Official Nosferatu Website which has been up and running since the late 1990s. Tell me Vlad, how many concerts have your tribute band performed? 2 I believe. There is no room for a tribute band on this page. Better you find a new name for the band. You are attempting to trade off a name that you were associated with over a quarter of a century ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aces High 1945 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Aces High 1945, you need to put your updates in the form of edit requests on the talk page, but you have to back it up with references that are not the official website. Cite the external magazines if possible. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Good morning Angus, please would you be so kind as to email contact details and postal addresses for Wikipedia's Legal Departments in the U.K., U.S.A. and Germany to officialnosferatu@googlemail.com We will then arrange to relay these to NOSFERATU's lawyers so that they can contact Wikipedia Lawyers and arrange permanent removal of references to "The Nosferatu Tribute Band". Worth noting that these specialist music business lawyers do indeed represent Sony Music amongst other clientele and are therefore Sony Music Lawyers. Thank you for your professionalism and support. Best Regards. Aces High 1945. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aces High 1945 (talk • contribs) 10:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


The Nosferatu is not a "tribute act" and most of the back catalogue we play was written by members of The Nosferatu. The fact remains that 2/3 of the lineup of the original Nosferatu band plays in The Nosferatu makes their mention on this page relevant, just like on every other band page that has multiple versions or splinter groups for example like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sweet. It is not up to this user to whitewash the facts to suits him, Wikipedia is not a promotional tool it is a factual account. A quick check of old releases reveals our significant contributions to this band. This must be reflected. Vladjanicek66 02:00, 22 November 2020‎ (UTC)

Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle

Not sure if Wikipedia informs you, but I reviewed your comments after the initial rejection and beefed up both the citations and some of the information to show the podcast/show is broad in its reach and effect over the 12+ years of its existence. I also added a note further explaining this in the Draft's Talk page. If you have the opportunity to re-review it, it would be appreciated. Thanks for your time and consideration. BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 18:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

BSpaTruthSquad, I'm still seeing references to its own material: Facebook posts, twitter announcements. These need to be replaced by secondary sources. Also if the podcast gives its own awards, that shouldn't go under Awards & Accolades. That section should be for what other media awards the podcast. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
BSpaTruthSquad, also if you are associated with the production in any way you need to declare COI. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

No, I am not directly associated with it. I'm actually a member of a school's staff that has been positively influenced by the existence of the show, and it deserves inclusion on Wikipedia because of its pop culture contributions. In addition, it's a circular argument you're making concerning citations. A FIRST-PARTY CITATION IS THE MOST DIRECT CITATION AND AS SUCH SHOULD EXCEED VALIDITY OF THIRD-PARTY SOURCING. Those aren't Facebook self-promotion posts. Those are actual videos of the podcast housed on Facebook, as the article states. Wikipedia does not whitelist fb.watch links, so there is no other way to flag that. The Twitter links contain the same and verify the retweet by RedditCFB, for instance. I will change the name of the section you cited to be less ambiguous. However, you're suggesting a podcast that has had over 2,000,000 views and listens in its 12+ years of existence (with 274 episodes to date) is not worthy of citation or credibility here. That doesn't seem right. BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

BSpaTruthSquad, please read WP:SELFPUB, WP:GNG and WP:PRIMARY regarding primary sourcing. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
BSpaTruthSquad, please note part of the writeup of this draft is copied from Rossi's draft of the article, of which Rossi has conflict of interest. See [5] I strongly suggest those portions of the writeup be rewritten completely. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

I am aware of that. They sent me what they wrote since Wikipedia suggests having third parties submit, and that's why I submitted it and have added to it since that point -- this entry should be considered as superceding Rossif76's entry. I am not directly involved with their show. As stated, my organization has been influenced positively by the show for over 12 years, making this a no-brainer for inclusion. I appreciate the edits I see from you on there, but I have to disagree about failure to include primary references when those references are the actual shows or information being cited. BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 19:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

BSpaTruthSquad, it still shows some conflict of interest as you are acting as an agent to submit their content. It's better if you rewrote their history into the article from scratch and depend on other newspapers / websites' material to describe their organization. Otherwise, you could declare COI as an agent of their writing. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

That's foolish since I verified the information and added the citations and additional information since that point. This thing has essentially been rewritten now and edited by two sets of eyes. If I were to identify as a COI here, that would just delay the approval process even further, correct? BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi - I apparently created the issues here that BSpaTruthSquad was defending. I want to apologize for the COI issue I created in the first place. Apparently, other reviewers denied the strength of the subsequent references he added (colleges/universities, D3football.com (a major Division 3 Football news resource, whose sister site D3hoops.com has an article on here), DailyGazette.com, ESPN, and others) as verifiable third-party sources in this case. He argued with them, stated their treatment of those resources was defamatory/libelous, and got banned. In the meantime, this article should be approved after now three sets of edits (by you, by him, and by Rich — who filled in the bare references apparently). What can you do to finally make this article get approved? Thanks for your time related to this, and again, apologies for the trouble I created. Rossif76 (talk) 21:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Rossif76, if you can show significant coverage by those third-party sources such as an independent ESPN, Bleacher Report, D3football.com, who does an article about your organization, then you can cite that. I don't mean a passing mention, where they quote your organization in a line or paragraph and otherwise just move on to the other subject at hand. I also don't mean a press-release like statement where they summarize some announcement from your organization. I was telling BSpaTruthSquad not to cite your website or social media excessively. Please read WP:ORGCRIT and WP:GNG. Also, there's WP:THREE. If you can list out your three best external news sources that cover your organization, then we can focus on reviewing those for notability purposes. Hope that helps. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Then explain to me how this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiësto%27s_Club_Life — was accepted. It is a podcast with no citations outside its own citations. You’re telling a podcast that has 274 episodes, over 2,000,000 views/listens, and a lifespan of over 12 years that it basically doesn’t exist. That’s pretty tough to swallow. I’m prepared to start a petition drive to raise awareness of this because you’re basically saying schools don’t matter in their own news releases that focused on our podcast and are undervaluing Division III schools in the statement you made. That’s frankly disappointing. Rossif76 (talk) 04:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Rossif76, you're missing the point. It was that the article should not be made up of mostly your press releases and website material. It should be from secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The school articles are fine, provided that they aren't press material. I'm also saying that they should be significant coverage WP:SIGCOV, not just passing mentions where the organization is just mentioned in a single sentence. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 06:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

And again, how did Tiesto’s podcast get approved with NO citations of the sort you explained? The citations are more than passing references here. #3 is a news article detailing my 20 years of broadcasting and my continued involvement with the podcast after handing over my play-by-play duties to Santillo in 2015. That article appeared in the physical version of the newspaper. #4 is a school focusing on our interview of their student-athlete. Same with #5, #6, and #7. References #8 & #9 verify the statement about us having the Chairperson of the Playoff Selection Committee join us on the show exclusively for 12 straight years until Covid, using D3football.com articles which link to those interviews or embed the interviews without our request. #10 is a full post by D3football.com on their D3blogs.com site of a discussion about that year’s interview. #13 shows a major news story in Division 3 broken by the show, and D3football.com uses our coverage and information as the centerpiece for their article. #14 shows our live video coverage around an ESPN broadcast of a football game, with #15 being the ESPN broadcast acknowledging us in the first place. While I understand Tiesto’s name carries weight generally, that article didn’t meet WP:SIGCOV and is sitting there as approved. The draft has more than met that level — I think the issue that’s being raised here is consistency in treatment of articles because it’s clear there’s a consistency issue somewhere here. Our show links were removed from the article by BSpaTruthSquad — leaving 15 minus one iTunes link to show the show’s existence and number of episodes. I’m not blaming you, but I think you get my point if you didn’t address my original question of why Tiesto’s sits approved but ours does not based on citations alone. Rossif76 (talk) 16:45, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Rossif76, please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. It's possible that the other article is not notable and should be deleted or pushed back to draft. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Rossif76, actually Tiësto's Club Life shouldn't be pushed back to draft, since it was created back in 2007, but if you want to nominate it for deletion at WP:AFD, that's possible. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

No, I wouldn’t advocate for it since I think Tiesto is a great DJ and I actually listen to his podcast each week. But we’re scrutinizing subjects based on an ambiguous set of inconsistently applied rules concerning citations that hold value. You stated you wanted more than passing references in something like D3football.com and the schools’ news items. Those are there and now fully explained to you above. You stated you wanted the video links of the shows that were originally used gone. They are. A sentence that caught my eye was a pretty gruesome admission in WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS: “Wikipedia recognizes that it suffers from systemic bias (see WP:BIAS).” The next set of “yeah but” statements doesn’t make that statement any less gruesome. It proves exactly what BSpaTruthSquad was saying about the process during his experience — a bunch of people are making random assessments about sources they don’t know or understand to determine the value of a subject instead of looking at the subject’s longevity, body of work, and value in pop and social media culture to make their determinations. This is like you waking up in the morning to say, “I don’t feel good,” and me saying, “Sorry, I don’t believe you until you get me an assessment from five doctors even though you’re pale and sweaty.” The answer is that Tiesto belongs there for this reason — although someone needs to go and improve his citations because I’m sure there is better coverage out there somewhere for his show. And the other answer is, yes, any podcast on a subject that has the most episodes concerning a major subject with coverage on Wikipedia — NCAA Division III College Football (274 episodes does not include live shows that didn’t get added to iTunes, meaning the real total is above 280 now — and D3football.com has 278 episodes of their podcast) —- deserves approval. If you’d like to see our metrics, I’d be happy to show you them. Rossif76 (talk) 17:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Rossif76, this is why I suggested going the WP:THREE route. Present the three best sources, and let the AFC reviewers check notability based on that. And it's not five doctors, it's more like at least two that does not include the team doctor. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

And they’re there. 1) D3football.com in #8-10,13; 2) major Division III colleges and universities (that are subjects of Wikipedia articles) in #4-7, and 3) the ESPN/USMMA combined connection in #14-15. If you feel I need to go drag out every instance of D3football.com using our interviews in their own podcasts and reference them (actually USING our material with permission) or other radio shows and podcasts James and I are asked to appear on to represent the show (there are several), I can be that level of verbose — but I’m not sure how that adds to a somewhat simple article identifying the history of the show, its focus, and its value in the subject matter covered. You tell me, though. Rossif76 (talk) 17:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Rossif76, that's not three. That's 10. Just pick three. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

No, that’s three — the article you pointed to describes three “sources,” not references. I’m categorizing sources here since in this case, there’s no perfect single-reference source. D3football.com is a source. Division III schools are a collective source. And USMMA with ESPN as a ratifying source is a collective source. Not everything in life fits into compartments the way being suggested. I’m sorry The NY Times hasn’t written about us yet, but seriously, I’m ready to just go through the entire thing and place the appearances we’ve done on behalf of the show for radio shows in NY, Alabama, New England, Texas, and other locations. But then you’ll say that “isn’t a single source.” And the circular arguments would continue... Rossif76 (talk) 23:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Rossif76, I've added those source listings to the talk page and am asking AFC reviewers to consider those. The point of WP:THREE is so we don't have to review tens of sources, which would be what you would do if you start flooding the article with "appearances". Let's see how the other reviewers feel about it. Do you want the draft resubmitted (if you haven't already done so)? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:The Effect

I see that you remarked that the sentence was lifted from the blurb after I had also tagged it as having been lifted from the blurb. Well, it has been cleaned up. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Robert McClenon, thanks, I think it has some potential for notability once the reviews have been scrubbed. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes. Plays that have been performed in real theatres are usually notable. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Robert McClenon, it's ready to be accepted, pending CSD G6 redirect deletion off the mainspace. It's got some notable awards and nominations. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Markeda McKay

Yankinge2 (talk) 15:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Why you declined my submisson? im very mad at you! please accept!!! 😤 😡😡😡😡😡😡

Yankinge2, see WP:DECLINED. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Yankinge2 (talk) 23:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)YOU IDIOT!!!

Yankinge2, it looks like you blanked out the article and deleted it, so no further action on this. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 23:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Notable News Sources for draft article Karen Earle Lile

In response to AngusWOOF's declining the draft article for the article I am currently writing for Karen Earle Lile, I was in the process of adding the notable news sources that AngusWOOF requested when AngusWOOF declined the article. Please see the update, which is not complete, but which begins to show the notability that I am bringing forward. Karen Earle Lile has International and national news coverage of her works dating back almost 40 years. Often times other men have been recognized in wikipedia with their own page for works she originated, even though she was the author and art director of the work. I think that to be inclusive, Wikipedia should have an article for her if it is going to recognize the others in the works she originated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PattiWindSpirit (talk • contribs) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

PattiWindSpirit, thanks, keep the sources coming. Those are going to be helpful. Also need to rewrite it so it's more objective and not sounding like an advocacy / promotional essay. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Magycal

Hi! you have rejected my submission due to the reliability of my sources. If you check, all the references justify the content. Can you please review again or clearly explain how can I improve to obtain approval? I let you know in advance that I am not related to this subject :) thank you for your attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConstantinoM (talk • contribs) 18:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


Hi! I saw my submission got rejected due to the reliability of my sources. All sources are from important news/blogs of expertise and all justify and support the content. I have seen many articles without such a strong justification, for that reason I ask you to review again or explain me exactly how can I improve in order to get approval. I let you know already that I am not related to the subject. Thank you for your help and attention — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConstantinoM (talk • contribs) 18:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

ConstantinoM, do the blogs have Wikipedia pages? Are there newspapers that go in depth on the company but are not press releases? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi again :) Usually when it is a press release these journals let you know that it is. At least these specific ones. The blogs that I used are blogs that go deeply in subjects such as technology and innovation. I truly believe it is well supported. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConstantinoM (talk • contribs) 11:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I haven´t receive an answer. Will you reconsider or let me know how cam I improve please? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConstantinoM (talk • contribs) 16:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ConstantinoM, please read WP:NCORP and WP:THREE and identify your three best sources that show the company is notable. You can list those three on the talk page. The blogs need to be notable ones not random ones. If Fintech.pl blog is notable it should have a page either here or on pl Wikipedia. The references need to connect to the article and not just sit at the end of the article. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:33, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Ketchum Death

Hi Angus; I received your message and I was initially told to include more sources what are you saying and could you please inform me of extra details?Personisgaming (talk) 19:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Personisgaming, as it stands, there's not much to say that warrants a separate article from the main. See WP:WITHIN AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF Since it is of no use, I am going to have to ask that the article is deleted. This is my first time in which I ask that an article that I created gets deleted at my request. Personisgaming (talk) 15:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Personisgaming, you can do so by using {{db-author}}. In the meantime, you can edit Ketchum's article if you need to provide further details. That would be helpful. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Anime Play Life: Unlimited - Help

Dear AngusWOOF,

you had declined the page submit "Anime Play Life: Unlimited" with the comment: "Needs coverage and reception from major video game reliable sources.".

Now to the game website of "Anime Play Life: Unlimited" which is also linked and verified on Steam has been added an information which proves that "Florian Lauka" is the developer of the game. I also removed the "Nintendo Switch" and "Android" from the platforms tab, because the video game appears a bit later on the mentioned platforms. The remaining platforms can be found on the official steam page of "Anime Play Life: Unlimited".

Is there anything else that needs to be changed to validate the submissions and could you add the representation graphics to the site I don't have the permission?

Anime Play Life: Unlimited Representation graphic: https://www.redicionstudio.com/Anime%20Play%20Life%20Unlimited%20Poster%20Graphic.png

With kind regards and thanks for your help,

Florian Lauka --Florian Lauka (talk) 15:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Florian Lauka, it needs major reviews from external news sources like the ones listed in WP:VG/RS. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:56, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

The Brook- Casino

Hi, Angus.

May I please ask why my article was deleted? I made the suggested edits and removed any language that was deemed not objective enough.

I am also unclear why my sources were also flagged. They are credible, 3rd party news sources that are also objective.

I am NOT an employee of this establishment and I made this clear when I made my account. I am just a Seabrook resident.

Additionally, when I look at another business page--there is similar information (like features of the property as mentioned by news reports. Please see this page as an example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_(hotel_and_casino). So why is this article up and mine was deleted? This went up around May 2020.

I don't feel it was fair to delete my page because it is relevant content to be in an encyclopedia. The Brook is a historical landmark in Seabrook, NH and I dedicated a whole section to its history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janine3116 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Janine3116, you should ask GeneralNotability who requested the deletion. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
(handled on my talk page) GeneralNotability (talk) 17:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:SkyVideosYT

Hello, AngusWOOF. I Tried To Fix The Issues Listed. Can You Please Review It?

AnonUser0413 (talk) 13:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

AnonUser0413, you haven't shown it to be notable with external news sources. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Adminship Request

Please See The Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/AnonUser0413 For More Information. AnonUser0413 (talk) 13:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

AnonUser0413, I'm not an admin or on the committee that approves adminships. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Avery Atkins (American football placekicker)

AngusWOOF, thank you for reviewing Draft:Avery Atkins (American football placekicker). You rejected the submission because Mr. Atkins has not yet been drafted to a professional league. However, Division 1 NCAA football is a high level of competition - and many current college football players have articles on Wikipedia. See for instance these current LSU players: Derek Stingley Jr., JaCoby Stevens, Arik Gilbert, Ja'Marr Chase, Terrace Marshall Jr., and Myles Brennan. You will see that many of these players are linked from the roster section for the 2019 LSU Tigers football team, a section where Mr. Atkins is listed.

In addition to LSU players, there are many from other schools, such as Sam Howell. If rejecting an article about Mr. Atkins, it would only stand that there should be a mass deletion of other D1 NCAA football players. I'm sure neither you nor any other editor intend that, so I ask that you expeditiously reconsider this submission. As the starting kickoff specialist for LSU, Mr. Atkins, who has many news articles written about him, is no less worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia than his teammates. — Hanna Lauren (talk • contribs) 16:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Hanna Lauren, yes, it's a high level but athletes that are in the collegiate division are not automatically or inherently notable. Please read WP:NCOLLATH and see if Atkins qualifies under there. It will also help your case if you can find more significant coverage (not routine sports summary coverage) of the player in national media outside of the immediate area. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
WP:NCOLLATH says that "college athletes and coaches are notable if they have been the subject of non-trivial media coverage beyond merely a reporting of their statistics". Atkins more than qualifies here. As cited in the submission, he has received coverage in The Advocate, The Opelika-Auburn News, The Reveille, and The New Orleans Times-Picayune. All of these are notable publications, and both the O-A News (which is nowhere near LSU) and the Times-Picayune are major newspapers in their home areas. The list includes examples of categories of notable players, but is not meant to be all-inclusive. Atkins was a member of the 2019 National Championship LSU Tigers team and is the grandson of two historical sports figures who both have Wikipedia entries. Note also that in the 2019 season, Atkins finished number 3 nationally in touchback percentage.
Please explain how Atkins is any less noteworthy than Arik Gilbert, who, as far as I can tell, has no college awards. His article, a stub, doesn't even mention his college career - if high school honors are sufficient, Atkins has just as many as Gilbert. Similarly, Terrace Marshall Jr. appears to have no college awards or anything else that makes him more noteworthy than Atkins. The same can be said for Myles Brennan. How can these players have articles if Atkins is not eligible? Hanna Lauren (talk) 18:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hanna Lauren, you can tag notability on the other college players or ask for them to be deleted with the WP:AFD process. As I just said, you should find articles outside of the immediate area (outside LSU, New Orleans, Louisiana) that cover Atkins in detail. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hanna Lauren, please also read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I just added two 247Sports.com citations - they are national media. Here is another article from them in which head coach Ed Orgeron speaks highly of Atkins' talent (I have since added as a reference, for the 2018 fumble recovery listed in his stats table). I also added a reference to Sports Illustrated's SI.com, which describes Atkins as "simply incredible", stating that he "blew the rest of the NCAA opposition out of the water". These are in addition to the already-cited O-A News, which is based in Opelika, Alabama, 370 miles away from New Orleans. I added a second reference from them, noting that Atkins led the nation in touchback percentage in 2018. I've also updated the citation for his being named to the SEC Football Leadership Council to a TV station out of Knoxville, TN (600 miles away). I have also added a USA Today (national media) piece with an article-length section on Atkins including mentions of his grandparents (where the citation was placed). Here's an Associated Press piece that discusses Atkins and his coaches' development of his unit. Hanna Lauren (talk) 18:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Hanna Lauren, please add that to the talk page or in the comment section of the draft. Maybe another reviewer can consider that. It's just that when the preponderance of references are local and routine coverage, that doesn't really help. For the SI.com and other critical reception, be sure to cite the writer who made the comments. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Conversational advertising draft

Hello, I see that you have left a comment on my draft stating that conversational advertising & marketing should be linked to the chatbot page instead. I think this is a confusion because the two are not the same nor is conversational advertising a subset of the chatbot topic. Conversational advertising can use chatbot technology to develop adverts but it does not depend on it and there are other ways for conversational advertising to work. Moreover, conversational advertising is a method of advertising and tracking data, not just the type of advert.

Let me know what I can do to make this more explicit as I hope to have this as a page in itself as upon looking at the chatbot wikipedia page it doesnt seem to fit over there

Thanks LucyDigitalVoice (talk) 11:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

LucyDigitalVoice, you'll have to make a case for the other uses, and also how the term came about. Who coined it, and how has it been popularized? Also check with the other editors at the chatbot page on whether that can be spun off. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Here's an article where the company called Drift coined the term: https://www.leadfeeder.com/blog/conversational-marketing-drift/ AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Thrawn: Alliances

Hi! I noticed you declined my draft. Since then, I have added 5 new sources and additional content. I just resubmitted it for review. Last time you reviewed it, I didn't even have to wait an hour. Thank you for getting to my submission so fast! I hope you see as much potential in the article as I do! Dswitz10734 (talk) 15:35, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Dswitz10734, can you detail the reception section more, specifically with particular critics in magazines? Has the book been nominated for awards, or shown in the best-seller lists for sci-fi? Is there a Publishers Weekly, School Library Journal, and other reviews? Den of Geek might be okay. Check out CNET review of Thrawn:Treason [6] The general Google poll isn't really critical reception. The plot doesn't need to have reference footnotes like that, unless you're trying to quote a particular interpretation of the plot. You can also add this article from The Verge to the development section: [7] and this one from Comicbook.com [8] Okay here you go for Publishers Weekly best-sellers: [9]. Also this interview by The Verge with Zahn can help the development section. [10] AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
@AngusWOOF: Thank you for the links! I have inserted links that you have given me. Thank you for your constructive contriticism. I appreciate your advice. About the citations in the Plot section, the references there were more to establish notability. Plus, plot sections of books are always uncited. The draft is currently submitted for review. Dswitz10734 (talk) 19:54, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Dswitz10734, if you can move the citations off the plot and use those articles for the development, release, and reception sections, that would be more helpful. I agree the plot paraphrases don't need citation. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

::: Dswitz10734, I'm requesting the redirect be cleared out so the draft can be accepted. Being a NYT best-seller helped. Keep finding more book reviews. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Dswitz10734, can you find more critical book reviews? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF, I found these two, but I don't know how notable the sites are. [11] By the look of it, this one is a Star Wars blog site and [12] this one is a general si-fi review site. I'll keep looking. Dswitz10734 (talk) 21:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
I just found another one: [13], LaughingPlace.com is a Disney News site. I know you're looking for more critical sites, but we may have already gone through those. Like you mentioned, the book hit number one on NY Times bestsellers, and I found a ref on NYTimes.com [14] I'll put this into the article.

I just noticed you already put this one in there, along with another ref! Thank you.

Dswitz10734, I added some more refideas on the talk page for the draft. Please add those reviews in your reception section. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:40, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
@AngusWOOF, I wasn't able to add most of the references because my computer blocks some sites and one of the ones listed I already cited. Thank you again for all of your help. I saw the revision history and you made a lot of edits! Thank you for your help. It looks like Onel5969 is willing to consider getting rid of the redirect because the book got on the NYT bestsellers. The finished product looks good, it has 17 references and I'm going to add the book cover if the draft gets moved to mainspace. It is currently up for review and I'm proud of it. I know it wasn't all me, so I'm grateful for your help. Dswitz10734 (talk) 19:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:VK Y

I do not know how to send you a message directly, but I want to know what was your right and criteria for you to decline my VKY-Victoria Kabeya page when I have reunited ALL the documents and links necessary which refer to her as an author. She writes in both French and English so if you cant understand French and the articles which tackled her work as an author this is not my fault but your issue. I brought up links after links and now there's a problem? Your comment for such a disapproval does not make any sense as you probably judge the personality of the author for not being famous enough according to your own criteria. I wish we could follow such discussion inprivate as I don't know how to check the private button on here. I will re-apply for the page and it will work. She has released a new book about Afro Iraqis in Basra as of 2020.My wiki page name is JaneMoreau — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaneMoreau (talk • contribs) 01:23, 6 December 2020‎ (UTC)

JaneMoreau, the previous draft was mostly references to her own websites and retail stores (Amazon, goodreads, etc.). That appears to be cleaned out now with your most recent edit. As for the criteria, see WP:NAUTHOR, WP:BASIC, and WP:THREE. Where did I say in my comments that you couldn't use French sources? Don't assume stuff like that. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
JaneMoreau, also it was a decline and not a rejection, so you can fix it up and resubmit it. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok no problem. Thank you for the answer and explaination. Have a good day — Preceding unsigned comment added by JaneMoreau (talk • contribs) 20:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

fear in dogs article proposed

Hello! What do you feel would need to be added in order to make the proposed Fear in Dogs article stand on its own? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.7.11.178 (talk) 05:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

47.7.11.178, my suggestion was to start a split proposal on the Dog behavior talk page and see if others agree that the fear section can be split off to its own article. See WP:SPLIT AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:37, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you and....Help

Hi Angus, thank you for helping me navigate this. I worked on a page that was rejected for reliability of sources so I'm going to add more...but you also commented it looked like it was copy pasted...it was because I wrote it in a document and then moved it over. Is that not recommended? I will also look more closely at formatting. TIA! Dana — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.82.190.136 (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Divya Agarwal

Sir, kindly check this article 'Divya Agarwal' as few editors are suggesting that sites like 'bollywoodshadis.com' cannot be used as reference sites. The previous version that you had edited was properly sourced...so please look into it if any changes are needed. Thank you. Minishaliper (talk) 03:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Minishaliper, I've replaced the Bollywood Shaadis references with better RS ones. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:55, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Question about policies

Hello, I noticed you edited Draft:Back to the Roots (company) recently. Did you also review the draft? I was working on trimming the text and fixing the references and didn't get a response back when I asked the other editor to review the references that were added. Based on what I was able to gather from WP:ORGDEPTH, the references should meet the criteria, and I listed out some on the draft's talk page. Would you mind reviewing to see if I'm missing anything in the policies? Thank you. Sfern824 (talk) 21:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Sfern824, I'll ping them again. Thanks for making the list on the talk page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:penny O'Brien

Woof! Can you help me to find a reference for draft:penny O'Brien ? I've been struggling to find one so can ye help me out? Woof! Photos of rdr2 (talk) 20:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Photos of rdr2, have you checked the local newspapers? Also any video game websites that cover voice actors? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:35, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

I did :) but every time i put on the page it says "it's must be independent source and i can't seem to find one :( but now in draft:penny O'Brien the source i put is it good? I would be happy if you review it! :) thanks for stickin' with me! Woof! Photos of rdr2 (talk) 19:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft Sukhpal Sukh

Brother i want to know that is Wikipedia considers official website of artist as a reliable source for verification ? VirdiOnline (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

VirdiOnline, official websites can be used to verify some items as WP:SELFPUB, but they do not contribute to establishing notability, which must be done with secondary news sources independent of the subject. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello AngusWOOF,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Ericka “Miss Everything” Camata

Hi AngusWOOF!! I hope you're doing good. Could you review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ericka_%E2%80%9CMiss_Everything%E2%80%9D_Camata again? This draft was created by Jsnueva1022, and I already improved it. I added how the person became famous, what year started, and coverage on national media. Thanks, I appreciate your efforts and hard work. — ArriehM 💬 12:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

ArriehM, is Miss Everything a YouTuber or a social media personality first and foremost? The infobox should probably change to comedian or person. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thanks! ArriehM (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

I already changed infobox YouTuber to infobox person. Thank You! ArriehM (talk) 23:33, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Mario_Judah

Yo Angus you should recheck out my page as I feel it has sufficient sources now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babypoltergiest (talk • contribs) 23:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Babypoltergiest, can you find sources that aren't primary source interview Q&A's or passing mentions? Also, how specifically does the person meet WP:MUSICBIO AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:36, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Hey there

Hey there, getting into this whole Wikipedia venture. Would love feedback on the first submission I hadDraft:Jim_Cooks_Food_Good. Also, if I can help with anything at all, I'm eager to learn.

-Packman

Packman711, you need to find external news articles that discuss the company and the website, not excerpts of articles by the website. See WP:ORGCRIT. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. I incorrectly assumed that the website being credited by news/media was a sign of credibility. Will link more articles that discuss the company. Packman711 (talk) 14:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Packman711, there may be news articles that passively mention the website Wikipedia:Trivial mentions, but we need ones that review or go into the history of the website / organization in detail. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Renesas RA

Hi AngusWOOF,

I hope you are doing good.

We are intending tt post the following page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Renesas_RA However as your feedback shows, it is believed that the article wasn't written from a neutral point of view. We have basically new idea how to write this article from a more neutral point of view than we did already. In fact we add this article in a good fait approach, as most other microcontroller pages do already, you can find them on Wikipedia, e.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STM32 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NXP_LPC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I.MX https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infineon_XMC

Please let us know what is needed from your point of view. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerWes (talk • contribs) 10:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

BerWes, I would remove the trademark / copyright symbols as that looks like it was copied straight out of the brochure. You can look at the STM32 and other articles and see what level of detail to include. References can be to website and press releases but it would really be more from external news sources independent of the subject to show how notable it is. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:24, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
AngusWOOF Thanks for your feedback. I have added an additional 10 external links to the Draft page. I also reviewed and did not find any trademark symbols. Please let me know what specific ones you might be referring to.

Request on 14:52:09, 21 December 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Normhowe


Regarding "quality culture" as a neologism: 1) I certainly didn't create that term. It is mentioned prominently in Juran's 'Quality Handbook', which has been considered a bible of quality mgt for many decades. The citations in the article take you to clear declarations of the importance of the concept in publications from US-Food & Drug Admin, the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering, the Parenteral Drug Association, the American Society for Quality, and the Australian TGA. These are not small time operations. If they think a subject is notable, it's not up to me or you to argue.

2) I was originally intending to modify the 'quality management' page. On it I found a red link for 'quality culture', which was (and is) a blank page. In my naivete I thought that I'd be doing everyone a favor by filling that blank page with foundational facts about the subject. Again, somebody before me thought that 'quality culture' needs its own page.

If more information is needed to make this a stand-alone page, I can easily fill a book. But, let's get the notability and neologism questions resolved first.

Normhowe (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Normhowe, it's more a question of whether the term is widely used outside of Juran's material / book. If it's coined by Juran ten it should redirect there. As a similar example, commitment contract and anti-charity are neologisms popularized by stickK. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:43, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:The Dust Coda

Hi there, hope you're OK! Thank you for reviewing the Draft page for The Dust Coda on 21 October 2020 ([1]). There have since been further references added, including an OCC chart reference. If you catch the time, could you please review the page once more and see if it is worthy of being published? Thank you for your time. SunGarden12 (talk) 18:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

SunGarden12, that's just one track of a Various Artists album, so that wouldn't be enough to establish notability. If the song itself charted, then maybe. Any other criteria listed there that you think the band meets? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thank you very much for your feedback. I believe they fulfil notability regarding rotation - as mentioned in the article, the band have been in rotation on Planet Rock Radio's B playlist twice, including from November 2020 (PR are a major rock station in the UK with 1.2 million listeners a week [2]). Sadly the radio station doesn't publish their playlists to the public as far as I can see, but can be verified via a search at UK Radio Live [3] for example if you want to check. I have also just added a reference with regards to a recent BBC Radio 2 play ([4]) - their song is played from 9 minutes 30 seconds. I also thought they met the criteria of being the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself, as I have a few references in regard to this, such as them being named as 'Ones To Watch' on Planet Rock Radio's website in their own article, and their latest video premiere featuring on there too as a standalone article [5][6]. Thank you very much for your time! SunGarden12 (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

SunGarden12, being a regular on a single radio station might be a promotional tie-in. Charting in local playlists isn't the same as with Billboard or OCC. If there are some articles that cover the band in detail from Planet Rock, then you can consider this, but not the ones where they post links to come check out their latest video. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 04:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Dust_Coda. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ "Planet Rock - Listening Figures". media.info. Retrieved December 17, 2020.
  3. ^ "Planet Rock Playlist". UK Radio Live. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  4. ^ BBC Radio 2 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000q86c. Retrieved December 18, 2020. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  5. ^ Colothan, Scott (October 11, 2017). "Ones To Watch: The Dust Coda". Planet Rock. Retrieved October 20, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  6. ^ Colothan, Scott (November 19, 2020). "The Dust Coda premiere 'Limbo Man' video". Planet Rock. Retrieved December 9, 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

Draft: Blake Amiri Edwards aka Blizz Vito

Please re-review the draft of the article on rapper Blizz Vito that was declined for not having noteworthy and credible sources. Please note that the draft was edited and updated to include articles on the rapper, Blizz Vito. Updated sources feature articles on the rapper from popular rap industry independent and credible rap publications, including but not limited to Respect Magazine, The Source Magazine, EarMilk, Hip Hop Weekly, Genius, Hype Magazine and other renowned rap publications. He was also featured in the Source Magazine as one of the Top 20 Rising Artists and featured in the drill category on Genius.com for his music. He is one of the leading figures in Brooklyn Drill hip hop as well with two popular single collaborations with 808 Melo. Thanks in advance for your attention. Tepidyears777 (talk) 07:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

I do not know if the citations about Planet Rock were for me. However, I have written and created articles about rap music artists (Sheff G, Sleepy Hallow and 808 Melo and the Brooklyn drill Music) and included highly reliable independent sources from Complex, Pitchfork, Respect Magazine, The Source, All Hip Hop, Hip Hop Weekly, etc. Thise publications have been around for decades and reach millions of people that are interested in rap music. The present artist was featured in very well known independent rap music publications and is a Verified artist on Genius.com and Soundcloud.com which accredits popular artists through verification.

1. Terrae, Portia (2020-01-28). "Brooklyn Rapper Blizz Vito Drops Off New 'Boyz in the Hood' Inspired Record Titled 'Opp Down'". RESPECT. RESPECT Magazine. Retrieved 2020-11-30.

2. ^ Miss2Bees (2020-08-24). "The Source |Blizz Vito Releases New Visual "Fuego Freestyle" [Extended Version]". The Source. Retrieved 2020-09-13.

3. Bey, Royal (2020-08-23). "[Watch] Blizz Vito Releases New Visual "Fuego Freestyle" [Extended Version]". Hip Hop Weekly. Retrieved 2020-08-27.

4. Mitchell, Tracy (2019-12-20). "Blizz Vito Releases "Fake Friends" Visual". RESPECT. Retrieved 2020-09-18.

5. Jones, Jiggy (2020-09-10). "The Source |Saint Jhn, Polo G, Eddy Mack & More Lead Rising Artists Playlist". The Source. Retrieved 2020-09-13.

Drill music and Brooklyn drill music is not really radio friendly music. This is not rock music. This is rap music and the listening audience is available through streaming platforms such as YouTube, Spotify, SoundCloud, etc. Based on the statistics reported on those sites, the artist has millions of listeners and has streams in aggregate above 30 million streams. Tepidyears777 (talk) 19:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Tepidyears777, Complex, Pitchfork, Respect., etc. are good sources, and I would stay away from Genius.com, Soundcloud.com, and iTunes/Spotify/YouTube for now. Note that Miss2Bees and Royal Bey's articles are the same so that only counts as one source. The Rising Artists Playlist is just a passing mention so it has no significant coverage. If you can narrow it down to WP:THREE sources, then you can list those on the talk page and we can review those. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

As per your suggestion please find three sources for review. Thanks in advance.

1. Mitchell, Tracy (2019-12-20). "Blizz Vito Releases "Fake Friends" Visual". RESPECT. Retrieved 2020-08-27.

2. Terrae, Portia (2020-01-28). "Brooklyn Rapper Blizz Vito Drops Off New 'Boyz in the Hood' Inspired Record Titled 'Opp Down'". RESPECT. RESPECT Magazine. Retrieved 2020-11-30.

3. Miss2Bees (2020-08-24). "The Source |Blizz Vito Releases New Visual "Fuego Freestyle" [Extended Version]". The Source. Retrieved 2020-09-13.

Tepidyears777 (talk) 14:43, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Tepidyears777, I've scrubbed the sources. It was a huge mess with misattributed author names like Shirley Ju all over the references that don't have her. Can you rewrite the biography section so it discusses the tracks and reception in the proper order. Also, the number of views need citation, either from the YouTube / Worldstarhiphop direct link or from a magazine source. Signing himself to his own label is not a notable achievement. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:02, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Tepidyears777, I also renamed the draft to Blizz Vito which is his common stage name. If you have news articles that indicate his birth date, birth place, and real name, then cite those. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:03, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your suggestions and assistance. I will rewrite the biography section as per your suggestions and where views are stated include the links to the source Youtube, Worldstar and/or article. Thanks again. Tepidyears777 (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Tepidyears777, please note that the verbiage needs to be objective and neutral in tone. If there are phrases praising or criticizing the subject, they need to be supported / quoted by the writer, such as: (writer) of (whatever magazine) wrote that (song) was "meh at best."

Edited the biography section and career sections to be very careful and make sure to delete any language and or mentions of views or streams. Additionally, I could only get birthday information from Spotify but not news article so I am asking should that birthday be deleted. Tepidyears777 (talk)| — Preceding undated comment added 21:08, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

As per your suggestions, I re-edited the biography section to delete any information that would seem redundant in other sections. Tepidyears777 (talk) 23:12, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your edits. They are greatly appreciated. I went back and made some additional changes such as accreditation for comments to correspond with the proper citation and delete an unnecessary reference that was used with the EarMilk playlist because it did not have anything to do with the article in AllHipHop. Thank you again. Tepidyears777 (talk) 16:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Tepidyears777, if there's are news articles that show that Vito is a prime example of Brooklyn drill artists, then that may help with WP:NMUSIC criterion #7 "Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability." AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Tepidyears777, I'd keep away from The Hype Magazine, as it's somewhat promotional / PR-driven and might not be as independent. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hype Magazine AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Adsmurai

Hi Angus! I realised you declined my draft some time ago. I changed a bit its structure and some references. If you could take it a look and give me some feedback I would really appreciate it!

Draft:Zero to Three

Hi there,

Can you please let me know any sort of recommendations for references you'd like to see here to help make this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chistina.mlynski#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Zero_to_Three_%28December_22%29 more flushed out? Chistina.mlynski (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Chistina.mlynski, you need more external news sources that cover the organization. There should be coverage but not passing mentions like [15] which only has a quote about her. Hopefully there are news articles that go into more detail. See WP:NCORP. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:41, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF/Archive_20&oldid=999820342"