User talk:BSpaTruthSquad

This is BSpaTruthSquad's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the (D3FB) Huddle (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs external news sources showing notability for the podcast. Do not cite its own website or podcasts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BSpaTruthSquad! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the (D3FB) Huddle (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zppix were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 19:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 20:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the (D3FB) Huddle (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zppix were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit prior to fixing the issues mentioned in the decline reason. The provided references do not satisfy WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 20:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the (D3FB) Huddle (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Continued resubmission without any meaningful change is disruptive. Do not resubmit again until you can provide independent reliable sources and have adequately disclosed your status as either a paid editor or one with a COI.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 20:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to warn you only once about this after your earlier behavior: do not resubmit drafts rapidly and with no meaningful changes. It's disruptive. Praxidicae (talk) 20:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My earlier behavior was informing you that improper application of the rules could lead to lawsuits against the entity, which is accurate. I also informed your chat group that Dailygazette.com is a daily newspaper, D3football.com is a third-party news website, that WPI, RPI, Union, and USMMA are all colleges and institutions producing their own news articles on their websites in the United States, etc. to be told that they're not third-party organizations that verify the information presented in the article. You have a clear bias against this article after discussion in the IRC chat. After I fixed the issues cited, you are still rejecting it. As such, I would like you to put me in touch with an administrator. Thank you. BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BSpaTruthSquad To be clear, are you stating that if your draft is not accepted for whatever reason, there will be possible legal action? Praxidicae (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BSpaTruthSquad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I stated to editors who are stating that United States colleges and universities, a local newspaper article, and other verifiable references are not third-party sources in the case of the article Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle that improper application rules can lead to legal action. This is an accurate and true statement, and states my rights and the rights of any of the sources cited since the statements made by those editors are libelous. In addition, I have been told to lie in the article by stating I have a personal relationship to the article (I do not) or that I'm paid for editing (I am not). I stated this multiple times, and the insistence that I lie for this purpose is improper. The sources that were cited in the article, especially after the final edit of it, are all proper and exceed many articles approved on Wikipedia. When I asked the editor their country of residence (since that might explain some of the confusion), they took exception to the question when in reality, it might explain a lot of why they weren't understanding the verifiability and veracity of the sources. I am an attorney, and a statement of legal rights is not a threat to sue, but a reminder to everyone that rules must be applied fairly and equally in the United States for an entity to exist in the United States. Bias is now being shown and I requested to speak with an administrator before being blocked. This is improper, and I request both unblocking and final approval of the article in its current state. I would also ask that the last two reviewers be scrutinized for their approach related to this article, as it was grossly improper. Thank you.

Decline reason:

It is not possible for me to grant "final approval of the article in its current state"; this is not something within the power of an administrator. Your repeated submission of that article was indeed disruptive; you are meant to meaningfully address the feedback prior to resubmitting, which you failed to do. Furthermore, your actions were clearly meant to have a chilling effect, in contradiction to WP:NLT. As you have not yet withdrawn your legal threat, there's nothing more to be done here. Yamla (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BSpaTruthSquad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I read through WP:NLT, and it states specifically, "A discussion as to whether material is libelous is not a legal threat. Wikipedia's policy on defamation is to delete libelous material as soon as it is identified. If you believe that you are the subject of a libelous statement on Wikipedia, please contact the information team at info-en-q@wikipedia.org." Before I had an opportunity to do so, I was banned from the live chat and stated that fact above. As such, NO LEGAL THREAT HAS BEEN MADE. This was an overreaction by reviewers and I stated as such here. In addition, the same reviewers that blocked me when I explained my references were UNITED STATES COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, A LOCAL NEWSPAPER, ESPN, AND D3FOOTBALL.COM -- a fully independent Division 3 football source nationally -- were still reviewing the article when it was clear they had some sort of improper bias. I asked to be put in touch with an admin, and they refused as they blocked me in live chat. This isn't appropriate. Again, I request unblocking and scrutiny for their actions, as their actions are a detriment to the Wikipedia community. BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You made a clear legal threat. Legal threats are not just statements of intent to seek legal action, but discussing legal action in a way meant to have a chilling effect on other editors. That's what you did, and until you withdraw the threat, there is nothing more to be done here. We cannot stop you from exercising any legal rights you have in your country, but you cannot edit Wikipedia with a threat outstanding, nor can you if you have a legal action underway. You can pursue your grievances in the courts of your country or on Wikipedia, but not both. I am declining your request, further appeals will have to be made as described below. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS

UTRS appeal #37524 has been declined.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. You need to address your own edits, not condemn other editors. The veiled legal threat, if not clearly withdrawn on your next request, will result in you being banned from UTRS. While you are within your rights to seek legal recourse, you may not edit Wikipedia while doing so. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle

Hello, BSpaTruthSquad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle

Hello, BSpaTruthSquad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "In the (D3FB) Huddle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 05:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]