User talk:Wk3v78k23tnsa
Welcome!
|
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvin Gaye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Removal of information that is "redundant" to infoboxes
[edit]Hi, Wk. I notice you have made a number of edits recently where you removed text from articles because the same information is also listed in an infobox. I believe you have misunderstood how infoboxes work in relation to article content. Infoboxes summarize key points, but it is expected that the same information would also be in the text of the article. You may want to take a look at WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE for more about this. I encourage you to reverse these recent changes. --RL0919 (talk) 23:43, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hello RL0919. Thank you for reaching out to me. I do agree and perhaps I should have used a modified reason for reverting. Based on other film articles for short films (using the Laurel and Hardy filmography as a guide), the mention of the Stooges names in the opening paragraph is redundant since it already states that this is a film starring the Three Stooges. Their names then appear in the text of the page, usually in the plot. The pages have been like this for quite a few years and the addition of the Stooges' names adds nothing to the page that is not already there. In short, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Your thoughts. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 23:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- OK, that is a more complex situation than just redundancy with an infobox. I don't think it is an exact parallel to Laurel and Hardy, since the lineup for the Stooges did vary. If the actors' full names appear in the body of the article (for example, if there is a Cast section, or actor names are mentioned parenthetically after character names in the Plot section), then it's arguable whether the detail of the lineup needs to be in the lead -- it becomes a lead vs. body question rather than infobox vs. article text. But actor names don't appear anywhere else except the infobox, then it should be put in the text somewhere. Also, it looks like some of the reverts took out other details, such as the year of release, which does belong in the lead of film articles. So at the least I think the changes should be made a bit more carefully. --RL0919 (talk) 00:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I agree with User:RL0919. The year of release certainly belongs in the lead; it is now missing from Slippery Silks and some others I checked. It is good for the lead to specify which Stooge lineup is featured. Film articles from the Laurel and Hardy filmography may not be the best guide to follow, as the articles are of variable quality. It would be better to follow the model of A Cure for Pokeritis, How Brown Saw the Baseball Game, Alien vs. Predator (film), and other film Featured Articles (listed here). Ewulp (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, not a problem. Nothing that cannot be fixed. I will go through these articles today and readd the info in a less klunky fashion. Thanks all. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 15:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me; thanks for your openness to feedback. --RL0919 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Of course. Frankly, I take the rotating Stooge line-up for granted, thinking any casual viewer knows there were several "third" stooges; hence the reason not to mention it from the get go." I started rewriting yesterday. Will try to wrap up by Monday.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me; thanks for your openness to feedback. --RL0919 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ok, not a problem. Nothing that cannot be fixed. I will go through these articles today and readd the info in a less klunky fashion. Thanks all. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 15:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) I agree with User:RL0919. The year of release certainly belongs in the lead; it is now missing from Slippery Silks and some others I checked. It is good for the lead to specify which Stooge lineup is featured. Film articles from the Laurel and Hardy filmography may not be the best guide to follow, as the articles are of variable quality. It would be better to follow the model of A Cure for Pokeritis, How Brown Saw the Baseball Game, Alien vs. Predator (film), and other film Featured Articles (listed here). Ewulp (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- OK, that is a more complex situation than just redundancy with an infobox. I don't think it is an exact parallel to Laurel and Hardy, since the lineup for the Stooges did vary. If the actors' full names appear in the body of the article (for example, if there is a Cast section, or actor names are mentioned parenthetically after character names in the Plot section), then it's arguable whether the detail of the lineup needs to be in the lead -- it becomes a lead vs. body question rather than infobox vs. article text. But actor names don't appear anywhere else except the infobox, then it should be put in the text somewhere. Also, it looks like some of the reverts took out other details, such as the year of release, which does belong in the lead of film articles. So at the least I think the changes should be made a bit more carefully. --RL0919 (talk) 00:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rock Spectacle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Week. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Please read WP:NFCC, which governs our policy concerning copyrighted images which are allowed under "Fair Use". Images should be around 300px in width (if landscape) or 300px in height (if portrait) to comply with these policies. Please do not upload full size copies of copyrighted images. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:UK Single - I Want To Hold Your Hand This Boy.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:UK Single - I Want To Hold Your Hand This Boy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
File:BJ sgaw elunow.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BJ sgaw elunow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 07:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Karen Valentine. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Not certain why I am getting this. Basic information on Karen Valentine is available at [[1]].Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
BLP discretionary sanctions alert
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
[edit]Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Karen Valentine. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please do not copy content from the IMDb to Wikipedia. This is user-generated content, and the IMDb should never be cited in a BLP. I recommend you read WP:RS and WP:BLP before you make any further edits to BLPs. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Fine. This will be the source of the most basic, readily available information on the subject. http://www.vipfaq.com/Karen%20Valentine.html, https://www.allmovie.com/artist/p72636 or https://www.famousbirthdays.com/people/karen-valentine.html. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Harrysemelsdisorder.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Harrysemelsdisorder.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Required information has been added.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Cb-pub-still.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cb-pub-still.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Duke concert prog 80.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Duke concert prog 80.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Our Gang Cousin Wilbur 1939.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang Cousin Wilbur 1939.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Duke concert prog 80.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Duke concert prog 80.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Files listed for discussion
[edit]Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 July 17 if you are interested in preserving their usage.
- File:BeatlesXmas63.jpg
- File:BeatlesXmas64.jpg
- File:BeatlesXmas65.jpg
- File:BeatlesXmas66.jpg
- File:BeatlesXmas67.jpg
- File:BeatlesXmas68.jpg
- File:BeatlesXmas69.jpg
Thank you. JG66 (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
File:BeatlesXmas63.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BeatlesXmas63.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Copyright removal on 'Fraidy Cat
[edit]Hi, it appears the plot for 'Fraidy Cat has been copied directly from sources where reuse was not clear, and without attribution, so I have removed it on copyvio grounds. SportingFlyer T·C 22:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Hook a Crook
[edit]Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ThatWasThenUKcover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ThatWasThenUKcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bewitched episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernard Fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IFeelFine UK.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IFeelFine UK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Addams Family episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Caruso (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:3stooges-have-rocket-will-travel-colpix.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:3stooges-have-rocket-will-travel-colpix.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Abacab Gen program 81.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Abacab Gen program 81.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:3stooges-have-rocket-will-travel45.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:3stooges-have-rocket-will-travel45.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Our Gang 1923 BoysToBoard.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang 1923 BoysToBoard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Orphaned non-free image File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Telling Whoppers Title Card
[edit]You continue to insist that the opening title card you've shared on the Telling Whoppers page is the original, and ask for "proof" when it's been removed.
As mentioned by another editor, the card in question was Photoshoped using a photograph of Joe Cobb taken a good 2-3 years after Telling Whoppers was produced. You can find it easily with a Google search, which is likely what the editor of the card did. In fact, many of the title cards for the silent films circulating the web right now are fan made. Well-made, yes. But nevertheless non-originals.
Furthermore, none of the Our Gang title cards from that period (pre-1936 - aside from 1932's Free Wheeling) used photographs of the kids. Some of the earliest ones used illustrations of the cast, but by the time of Telling Whoppers, Hal Roach Studio title cards typically used a more generic look.
So where is the original title card for Telling Whoppers? It's lost, like so many of the others. Comedy3 (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for clarifying. Either way, there is no harm retaining it since a recreated title card is better than leaving the spot blank.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
- I was able to unearth an ad for the film that appeared in The Film Daily to replace the recreated title card. Hope this resolves this issue. Thank you kindly.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- For the record, Boys Will Be Joys featured four moving head shots of the boys during the opening titles, which is why I thought the recreated title card for Telling Whoppers was an original.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 20:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- I was able to unearth an ad for the film that appeared in The Film Daily to replace the recreated title card. Hope this resolves this issue. Thank you kindly.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- Title card has been replaced with original ad featured in The Film Daily. Deletion of Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg is fine. Thank you kindly.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Title cards
[edit]Changes to indobox images should have consensus first. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for alerting me. Was unaware. Is that rule listed on Wiki somewhere?Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Chipmunks See Doctor Dolittle
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Chipmunks See Doctor Dolittle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[{{{value1}}}]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
The page File:AddamsFamily TCcolourized.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Colourized Munsters.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Colourized Munsters.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AddamsFamily TC colourized.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AddamsFamily TC colourized.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Munsters Season2 TC colourized.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Munsters Season2 TC colourized.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HarleneWood Dizzydoctors.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:HarleneWood Dizzydoctors.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Boynamed2014.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Boynamed2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DaffyDuckDinosaur-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:DaffyDuckDinosaur-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Awfulorphan TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Awfulorphan TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve North Beach (album)
[edit]Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa,
Thank you for creating North Beach (album).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Could use a couple more sources to strengthen notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello. Yes, I am aware that this article is in need of additional sources, which I am actively looking for. I guess I should mark the article as a "stub" for now.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 14:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FirstKissCB-betterquality.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:FirstKissCB-betterquality.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Some problems with your edits
[edit]Thanks for adding some material here but I have to revert for several reasons. First, you cited an invalid source with Discogs.com. Secondly, you've changed the track listing to use {{track listing}} but why? Finally, you've included the small
HTML tag when there is no fine print in the article. Can you please explain why you made these three changes? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- To add: I'm also confused as to why you added songwriters using the
Note
field. Why did you do this? Also, why did you include the back cover of the album? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)- Sorry for not highlighting reasons behind the changes. 1. I was unaware that discogs is an invalid source, particularly since the proof is indisputable based on photo uploads of original album releases. 2. The track listing required additional details and was incorrectly formatted as it pertained 1988, 2006 and 2014 re-releases. It appears those tracks were thrown in without regard to format. 3. The new format is consistent with other articles pertaining to this artist. See Jazz Impressions of A Boy Named Charlie Brown, The Eclectic Vince Guaraldi and Oaxaca (album). In general, most classic albums should be represented by their original release, with notes added pertaining to remasters, re-releases and such. 4. The rear cover was added for historical purposes because it is part of the original release and is not included in any re-releases. Please advise why these are issues. It appears this is nitpicking and splitting hairs when sources are added. Are these "problems" or are these just questions as to why? For an article that is as high profile as this one, it needed a considerable amount of formatting.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wk3v78k23tnsa, 1.) Yes, this is an issue: Discogs is an invalid source. If your source is the liner notes to an album, then cite those instead of a scan of them on a third-party site that accepts user submissions. Why would that be better than using the actual source itself? 2.) Yes, this is an issue: there are several valid ways of styling a track listing and existing styles should be retained. Additionally, randomly inserting things that have semantic meaning like
small
because... you like to? is bad form and in some measure hostile to the intelligibility of the page. 3.) Yes, this is an issue: by your own reasoning, these articles should have track listings as plain lists per MOS:VAR. 4.) Yes, this is an issue: as I noted in the deletion nomination, this violates WP:NFCC#8. It is not "splitting hairs" for me to revert you for adding invalid sources (and seeming to have no understanding of WP:RS), inserting nonsense semantic content, and including non-free media without a valid rationale. I'm happy to have your help collaborating on this but the fact that you don't understand the importance of these issues is concerning. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)- Thank you for taking the time to explain. Using
small
was not done because I "like to" (please cease the MOS:YOU). I had seen this format style at some point in the past and used it moving forward. That's all. I will use proper format moving forward. WP:AAGF. In all my years of using Wiki, I have never had issues with source citing until now so the accusation of "seeming to have no understanding of WP:RS" is grossly insulting. Thank you kindly.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 22:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)- Wk3v78k23tnsa, It was not clear to me why you used that tag, so thank you for explaining. I was assuming good faith that you were trying to improve the encyclopedia and sure enough, many of the changes you made were improvements, so I tried to temper my criticism with appreciation: I respect anyone who gives free labor to this project. Since WP:RS is a pretty key extension of WP:OR, I take it pretty seriously. It so happens that I recently looked at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources and learned quite a bit myself, so I would encourage you to take a peek there to see some sources considered acceptable and not acceptable by that project. All of us have things to learn (myself included) and all of us have things to give (yourself included), so I appreciate you working with me to make this reference work better. Thanks again and pardon me if my tone was too hostile. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Again, do not insert {{track listing}} per MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Just so I am clear. Formats contained in articles like Halcyon Days (Ellie Goulding album)#Track listing and Man of the Woods#Track listing are NOT correct, but your unique version is. Got it. I did not realize you were a Wiki legend with his own self-serving Wiki autobiography. Cheers Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wk3v78k23tnsa, How is that what you got from me saying, "There are multiple ways to do the same thing"? I never wrote that one style is right and one is wrong: what I wrote was that since there are multiple styles, the existing style for that page should be retained. What is with your grossly negative and rude attitude? I could just as easily say, "Your unique version is right. Got it." but I don't write things like that because I'm trying to treat you like an adult with respect. Shame on you for this post. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. Per MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLEGUIDE, please stop changing the type of track listing you find in articles. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. There is a clear template that is to be used. Template:Track listing. It is reiterated in the very source you cited - [[2]]. I am uncertain why you are choosing to ignore this as you have made no clear argument nor are any templates cited in your change lot. It clearly says there are several ways to do this, v. one over the other. This is clearly a personal preference of yourse that requires further discussion.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wk3v78k23tnsa, It is not "to be used" it can be used. Don't go to articles that already have an established style and change them. I've explained this to you several times and pointed you to guidelines that say the same. Why do you insist on changing stylistic things to how you like them? Have you looked at MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wk3v78k23tnsa, Why do you keep on reverting to add this template when you know you're not supposed to? See WP:BRD: you need to post to talk to explain why an existing style should be changed. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. There is a clear template that is to be used. Template:Track listing. It is reiterated in the very source you cited - [[2]]. I am uncertain why you are choosing to ignore this as you have made no clear argument nor are any templates cited in your change lot. It clearly says there are several ways to do this, v. one over the other. This is clearly a personal preference of yourse that requires further discussion.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. Per MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLEGUIDE, please stop changing the type of track listing you find in articles. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wk3v78k23tnsa, How is that what you got from me saying, "There are multiple ways to do the same thing"? I never wrote that one style is right and one is wrong: what I wrote was that since there are multiple styles, the existing style for that page should be retained. What is with your grossly negative and rude attitude? I could just as easily say, "Your unique version is right. Got it." but I don't write things like that because I'm trying to treat you like an adult with respect. Shame on you for this post. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Just so I am clear. Formats contained in articles like Halcyon Days (Ellie Goulding album)#Track listing and Man of the Woods#Track listing are NOT correct, but your unique version is. Got it. I did not realize you were a Wiki legend with his own self-serving Wiki autobiography. Cheers Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
- Again, do not insert {{track listing}} per MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Wk3v78k23tnsa, It was not clear to me why you used that tag, so thank you for explaining. I was assuming good faith that you were trying to improve the encyclopedia and sure enough, many of the changes you made were improvements, so I tried to temper my criticism with appreciation: I respect anyone who gives free labor to this project. Since WP:RS is a pretty key extension of WP:OR, I take it pretty seriously. It so happens that I recently looked at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources and learned quite a bit myself, so I would encourage you to take a peek there to see some sources considered acceptable and not acceptable by that project. All of us have things to learn (myself included) and all of us have things to give (yourself included), so I appreciate you working with me to make this reference work better. Thanks again and pardon me if my tone was too hostile. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to explain. Using
- Wk3v78k23tnsa, 1.) Yes, this is an issue: Discogs is an invalid source. If your source is the liner notes to an album, then cite those instead of a scan of them on a third-party site that accepts user submissions. Why would that be better than using the actual source itself? 2.) Yes, this is an issue: there are several valid ways of styling a track listing and existing styles should be retained. Additionally, randomly inserting things that have semantic meaning like
- Sorry for not highlighting reasons behind the changes. 1. I was unaware that discogs is an invalid source, particularly since the proof is indisputable based on photo uploads of original album releases. 2. The track listing required additional details and was incorrectly formatted as it pertained 1988, 2006 and 2014 re-releases. It appears those tracks were thrown in without regard to format. 3. The new format is consistent with other articles pertaining to this artist. See Jazz Impressions of A Boy Named Charlie Brown, The Eclectic Vince Guaraldi and Oaxaca (album). In general, most classic albums should be represented by their original release, with notes added pertaining to remasters, re-releases and such. 4. The rear cover was added for historical purposes because it is part of the original release and is not included in any re-releases. Please advise why these are issues. It appears this is nitpicking and splitting hairs when sources are added. Are these "problems" or are these just questions as to why? For an article that is as high profile as this one, it needed a considerable amount of formatting.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- The Guaraldi articles were all over the map, which is why I chose the new format that allowed occasional notes (something I know is to be used sparingly per Template:Track listing. Your reverts are deleting track lengths, a big no-no. Some albums are a terrible mishmash with error made by lazy record companies lacking quality control; this requires extra formatting to make sense of them. The Template:Track listing makes extra contingencies for these gaffes by record companies. I admit I made a error originally using
<small>
. My apologies, as I recall seeing that in an article years back. I have ceased using<small>
. For know, can we please use Template:Track listing for the Guaraldi entries? It helps in dividing up unique takes. I am always up for compromise. Your thoughts. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 18:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)- No, we cannot. Please revert yourself per MOS:VAR. You have shown no comprehension of this page. Have you read it? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯. I am following all the work that Wk3v78k23tnsa has done for the Guaraldi entries. That being said, I have reviewed the MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE, the latter which gives quite a few track listing options. For someone like Vince Guaraldi, whose recorded output is a mess, I think Wk3v78k23tnsa is correct to use the formatting option that is specified in more detail Template:Track listing (which I see is a link from WP:ALBUMSTYLE). Wk3v78k23tnsa is also correct to have the "Notes" option available. That being said, I advise Wk3v78k23tnsa to not get into an edit war. As I have posted elsewhere, this is why I never wanted to create a username for Wiki in the first place, since it fosters a generally hostile environment and dominated by a few select editors (no offense meant to Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯, but it is true). Either way, thank you both for maintaining these Vince Guaraldi entries. His representation on Wiki was sorely missing and you are both doing a great job! OldandGood2876 (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- OldandGood2876, I'm not offended and I agree that there are a lot of petty wars of attrition on Wikipedia. Thanks for the work you've done here in spite of the fact that it's sometimes pretty thankless. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- You bet, Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯. It is a labor of love and a half. Thank you for keeping things on the up and up as well. Wk3v78k23tnsa - thanx for picking up the slack. I have been dealing with the effects of Coronavirus disease 2019 so it sidelined me for some time. You are both doing great work and I thank you both for it!OldandGood2876 (talk) 16:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- OldandGood2876, I'm not offended and I agree that there are a lot of petty wars of attrition on Wikipedia. Thanks for the work you've done here in spite of the fact that it's sometimes pretty thankless. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯. I am following all the work that Wk3v78k23tnsa has done for the Guaraldi entries. That being said, I have reviewed the MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE, the latter which gives quite a few track listing options. For someone like Vince Guaraldi, whose recorded output is a mess, I think Wk3v78k23tnsa is correct to use the formatting option that is specified in more detail Template:Track listing (which I see is a link from WP:ALBUMSTYLE). Wk3v78k23tnsa is also correct to have the "Notes" option available. That being said, I advise Wk3v78k23tnsa to not get into an edit war. As I have posted elsewhere, this is why I never wanted to create a username for Wiki in the first place, since it fosters a generally hostile environment and dominated by a few select editors (no offense meant to Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯, but it is true). Either way, thank you both for maintaining these Vince Guaraldi entries. His representation on Wiki was sorely missing and you are both doing a great job! OldandGood2876 (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- No, we cannot. Please revert yourself per MOS:VAR. You have shown no comprehension of this page. Have you read it? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ Speaking of using
small
HTML tag, you might want to take a look at this article: Music Box (The Monkees album). Caught this earlier today. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)- Wk3v78k23tnsa, 198 instances! ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- I know, right? I thought I was bad. ☺ Hope all is well. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Wk3v78k23tnsa, 198 instances! ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
File:CBXmasSoundtrack65rear.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CBXmasSoundtrack65rear.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Boycover1989.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boycover1989.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CBXmasSoundtrack65rear.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:CBXmasSoundtrack65rear.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
North Beach
[edit]I saw that you created this article. Please see the article, make necessary changes, click on my name for help, and read the Wikipedia documentation before creating another article. Thank you.
Vmavanti (talk) 13:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- This appears to have been corrected by OldandGood2876. I am no longer using the
small
HTML tag and forget why I even started using that in the first place. I must have seen it incorrectly used in the past and thought it was a good idea. No worries. I got called out for it already by another user and learned my lesson. Cheers.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 22:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TweetSOS TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:TweetSOS TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bobtvseries.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bobtvseries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Title card was accidentally removed from article by poor editing. It has since been restored.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ItsMagicCB TVGuidead.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ItsMagicCB TVGuidead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
did you forget to sign in?
[edit]I see a number of edits made to Vince Guaraldi topics that were made by an anon. Did you forget to sign-in? Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- No. Why? I will check them out. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 15:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- A number of anon edits were made to the topic you had previously been working on. It seemed unusual. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- I have a hunch who might be doing those edits. I suspect I have communicated with the person on social media before (using a handle rather than a real name) and the person prefers to make edits anonymously instead of establish a Wiki account. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 22:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- A number of anon edits were made to the topic you had previously been working on. It seemed unusual. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Vince Guaraldi articles
[edit]I have posted this elsewhere but I want to thank you for all the work you put into the Vince Guaraldi entries!OldandGood2876 (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. It has been rewarding. I am a stickler for researching before creating articles. Glad to see someone appreciate the efforts. Be well, and take care of your health. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Arbitrary?
[edit]Rather than comment on my "careless work", you could avoid the public personal attack by focussing on the content instead of the contributor. Secondly, it was not arbitrary. You commented on my talk page asking for a reason, and I supply with every edit summary. If you can't find the edit summaries, I can show you how to. If you don't like the reason, a discussion on the talk page of the article is appropriate. In short, I've shown patience with your poor behaviour and I am treating you with respect. I expect you to do the same. Failure to do so will be on your own head. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Defensive, we are? It was a careless edit to not capitalize a title section. Plus, the discussion you had with newbie User:OldandGood2876 a short while back clearly revolved around the removal of redlinks, which I agree was a valid point. Except there are none now. Articles will eventually be created for the singles that need them. Other singles link to cover versions that have existing articles, negating the issue of redlinks. The reasoning you are citing for reverting is arbitrary and capricious. I will gladly treat any Wiki user with respect when it is deserved but this should have been discussed on the talk page first before reverting again. Considering how small the amount of singles there actually are, this seems like more arbitrary than most reverts. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AndreaElson-headshot.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AndreaElson-headshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:AndreaElson-headshot.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AndreaElson-headshot.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BenjiGregory-headshot.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BenjiGregory-headshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:BenjiGregory-headshot.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BenjiGregory-headshot.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Dudley01pubphoto.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Dudley01pubphoto.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Uploading colorized versions of BW photos.
[edit]Hi Wk3v78k23tnsa. I've noticed that you've been recently uploading colorized versions of files such as File:46 RuthGodfreyWhite headshot.jpg and File:Joe Besser.jpg. The are some potential problems with doing such a thing that are currently being discussed at WT:NFCC#Colorized photos/screenshots. You welcome to comment there if you like, but it might be a good idea to slow down a bit until this can be sorted out. Nobody is accusing you of bad-faith or intentionally doing anything wrong; it's just that there may be copyright issues related to the colorized versions your uploading that might be a problem per WP:IUP and WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi. I appreciate you reaching out to me. I had tried research this before uploading but could find anything. Thank you for sharing WP:IUP, WP:NFCC and WT:NFCC#Colorized photos/screenshots. I'll stop for now. Do not want to invest time in uploading only to have it deleted. Many thanks. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- It's been suggested that the updated colorized versions you uploaded be reverted back to the previous black and white versions. If you agree with this suggestion, then you can help out by going back and doing the reverting yourself. If you disagree with this, then you probbaly should explain why in the WT:NFCC discussion so others can respond. If you do nothing, the files will likely be reverted by someone else and fairly soon before the older balack and white versions are deleted per WP:F5. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ItsMagicCB TVGuidead.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ItsMagicCB TVGuidead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
The file File:ABNCB70Columbia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in A Boy Named Charlie Brown#A Boy Named Charlie Brown: Selections from the Film Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above also applies to File:Abncb-soundtrack-cd-cover.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
File:A Charlie Brown Christmas (Rmst).jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A Charlie Brown Christmas (Rmst).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:SharynMoffett IOU.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SharynMoffett IOU.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 00:39, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:PhilRoman-headshot.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:PhilRoman-headshot.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 00:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SharynMoffett IOU.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SharynMoffett IOU.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SharynMoffett IOU.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SharynMoffett IOU.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AfternoonVGWQuartet COVER.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:AfternoonVGWQuartet COVER.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Greatesthits89CDcoverGuaradi.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Greatesthits89CDcoverGuaradi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Greatesthitslp80VinceG.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Greatesthitslp80VinceG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PeanutsportraitsCD.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:PeanutsportraitsCD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:VerybestVG-Cover.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:VerybestVG-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BeachBoys Tomboy PS 78.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BeachBoys Tomboy PS 78.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BeachBoys Tomboy PS 78.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BeachBoys Tomboy PS 78.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:YankeeDoodleDuck TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:YankeeDoodleDuck TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Orphaned non-free image File:HareGrowsManhattan-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:HareGrowsManhattan-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HareRemover-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:HareRemover-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:OdorableKitty-BRTC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:OdorableKitty-BRTC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SlickHare TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SlickHare TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve Once Again (Peter Tork and James Lee Stanley album)
[edit]Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa,
Thank you for creating Once Again (Peter Tork and James Lee Stanley album).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
additional reliable references are needed for this article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 23:22, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Live/Backstage at the Coffee Gallery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficient references for notability. Article does not meet requirements for WP:Music, which specifies independent, reliable secondary sources. Note that monkeeslivealmanac.com is a primary source and not a reference.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 00:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please help me understand: where do you see monkeeslivealmanac.com listed as a source? AllMusic is currently listed as a source. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Wk3v78k23tnsa monkeeslivealmanac.com is listed as a reference on two of the other Peter Tork Albums.For Pete’s sake: is a *very good* reference. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Got it. It is hard to find decent references outside of AllMusic for solo Monkee activity. I will keep trying.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 20:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
[edit]Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Will do.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jazz4Peanuts cD.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Jazz4Peanuts cD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HarkABird2020.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:HarkABird2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Genesis thentherewere3 tour.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Genesis thentherewere3 tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Goldimouse3CatsTC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Goldimouse3CatsTC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Crozer-Keystone-logo-300dpi.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Crozer-Keystone-logo-300dpi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Jazz4Peanuts cD.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Jazz4Peanuts cD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Afd
[edit]Hello. I have nominated an article you created for deletion alongside other articles at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animalympics (soundtrack). Please join the discussion, thanks. 👨x🐱 (talk) 16:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:40yrsCBXmasCD.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:40yrsCBXmasCD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:40yrsCBXmasCD.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:40yrsCBXmasCD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of 40 Years: A Charlie Brown Christmas for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/40 Years: A Charlie Brown Christmas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Onel5969 TT me 00:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CornyConcerto TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:CornyConcerto TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FallingHare-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:FallingHare-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Franz Liszt
[edit]https://ew.com/tv/best-classic-looney-tunes-cartoons-streaming-hbo-max/ If you search for "Franz Liszt" and just read down from there, he gets coverage, and so do his creations. If any get nominated for deletion, finding additional reviews shouldn't be a problem. Dream Focus 01:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Very helpful. Thank you kindly. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 03:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Orphaned non-free image File:DaffyDuckDinosaur-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:DaffyDuckDinosaur-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DaffyDuckDinosaur-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:DaffyDuckDinosaur-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SlappilyMarriedTC.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SlappilyMarriedTC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
"Chew-Chew Baby" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Chew-Chew Baby and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 9#Chew-Chew Baby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradoctor (talk • contribs) 18:26, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
The file File:BB Bluebird.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Image insufficiently supported by critical commentary. A-side track of the specific release already conveyed in text and understood by readers. Portion not proven contextually significant to the whole song.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CheeseChasers TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:CheeseChasers TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BearforPunishment TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BearforPunishment TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GoingGoingGosh TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:GoingGoingGosh TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:GreatPumpkinCBBuenaVista.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:GreatPumpkinCBBuenaVista.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GreatPumpkinCBBuenaVista.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:GreatPumpkinCBBuenaVista.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Track listings
[edit]Please see WP:ALBUMSTYLE: there are multiple ways to style a track listing and they should not be changed without prior consensus. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Understood. Please advise what page(s) this is in reference to. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 21:41, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please stop doing this. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- You wrote above that you would stop doing this. Why are you doing it again? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please stop doing this. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IDMercury2.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IDMercury2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve Night (George Winston album)
[edit]Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa,
Thank you for creating Night (George Winston album).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
could use a reception section
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IDMercury2.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:IDMercury2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Marking edits as minor
[edit]Hello. Please do not mark anything bigger than fixing a typo as a minor edit per Help:Minor edit. You have marked significant contributions like this edit as minor when they definitely are not. Thanks. Ss112 10:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WackikiWabbit43-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:WackikiWabbit43-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laurel and Hardy (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hal Smith.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JerryQuiteContrary-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:JerryQuiteContrary-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ConcordLogo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ConcordLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ReadySetZoom TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ReadySetZoom TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:StopLookHastenTC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:StopLookHastenTC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ZippingAlong-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ZippingAlong-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GuidedMuscle TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:GuidedMuscle TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ThereTheyGoGoGo-TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ThereTheyGoGoGo-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ScrambledAchesTC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ScrambledAchesTC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa. Thank you for your work on A Charlie Brown Thanksgiving: Original Soundtrack Recording. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the timely article
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Lightburst (talk) 15:30, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BonnieBonnell NERT.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:BonnieBonnell NERT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —holly {chat} 01:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:OG Seeing the World TC.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:OG Seeing the World TC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Looney Tunes Golden Collection: Volume 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ralph James.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to join New pages patrol
[edit]Hello Wk3v78k23tnsa!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CROWINGPAINStc.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:CROWINGPAINStc.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Twice Two, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brats.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Plot summaries
[edit]It is all right to change wording that is inaccurate, or overlong, but some of your changes (e.g. "subterrestrial" for "underground", "generate funds" for "raise money", "populace of" for "all of') are not justifiable on either of those bases and appear to be merely flaunting vocabulary. Please keep in mind that articles exist to be read, and not only by you. 2601:642:4600:D3B0:28F1:6B97:451F:274E (talk) 15:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Point well taken. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ALF-tc-remaster.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ALF-tc-remaster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A Ducking They Did Go, you may be blocked from editing. To put it in plain English: what the fuck was that? Bbb23, you had to read similarly indigestible prose when you looked at the I Dream of Jeannie edits--I feel for you. Drmies (talk) 02:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Drmies: I read "indigestible prose" all the time, no doubt more frequently than the digestible kind. I find if you keep hydrated, you avoid the worst of it. :p BTW, the edits you're highlighting happened in early March. The user hasn't edited since my partial block. Here's to good food and good prose! --Bbb23 (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just imagine how it feels to have this done to your article after you've worked long and hard on wording... Chafe66 (talk) 22:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Although commendable, it is apparent that insufficient investment was allocated to the composition of these narratives. The discernible shortcomings in punctuation, sentence structure, and excessive verbosity render them of a substandard quality, particularly in accordance with the succinct guidelines upheld by Wikipedia. Specifically, see MOS:TVPLOT, MOS:PLOTLENGTH and MOS:FILMPLOT. Also WP:TV, WP:MOSTVm MOS:ENGVAR, MOS:CONTRACTIONS. Thank you kindly. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 01:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Pity there are so few in the U.S. that can read with a high level of intelligence. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 01:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please get a consensus for your version on the article's talk page. I made an edit on behalf of a user that had a false positive on an edit filter. If you resume edit-warring on this, you will be blocked for a longer duration. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, we can read your prose, we just can't digest it. Now, please stop editing while logged-out--and that also goes for the IPs you use to make these little edits to short article descriptions. Drmies (talk) 20:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Bbb23, this one was particularly foolish--do you remember when people were writing those funny summaries of "I like Big Butts"? Note the insult, above, about intelligence. CU does not confirm them with User talk:24.206.78.50 but I have technical reasons to believe that they are the same, besides insults like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmies (talk • contribs)
- Hey, Drmies, good thing (sort of) that I have this user on my watchlist because you forgot to sign, so the ping didn't work. That IP looks like a proxy to me, no? I guess I'm trying to understand why Wk3v78k23tnsa's (why do we allow usernames like this?) block hasn't been changed to sitewide and indefinitely. As for your comment about butts, nope, I don't remember, sorry.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Good evening Drmies. None of the highlighted [edits are attributed to my authorship. Engaging in deceitful practices, such as sock puppetry, is not a pursuit I would undertake. Rather, it seems plausible that they stem from an unidentified Warner Bros. enthusiast within the Wikipedia community, devoid of a registered username. Noteworthy is the discernible proclivity towards employing immature invectives and terse expressions, which may be attributed to the aforementioned source. Also, your preemptive expression of contrition regarding the intentional mistreatment of Wikipedia contributors striving to elevate the standard of discourse through WP:GF edits is duly acknowledged. Thank you kindly.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 00:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- My absence of a block on Wikipedia is supported by several factors. Firstly, I refrain from participating in any form of vandalism. Secondly, all of my edits are made in WP:GOODFAITH and adhere strictly to the guidelines outlined in the Wikipedia Manual of Style WP:MOS. Thirdly, I have ceased involvement in edit conflicts and have instead opted to file an incident report. I am content with the outcome of this report, wherein both parties involved were equitably penalized. Lastly, my extensive and esteemed edit history underscores my commitment to WP:EDITORINTEGRITY within the Wikipedia community. Thank you kindly. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 01:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- You forgot your modesty.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- So, quick question. First of all, this text is 100% AI-generated, according to GPTZero. That's not a thing we do here. Second, ""hideous, verbose prose" only to individuals exhibiting deficiencies in fundamental reading comprehension abilities"--is that individual me? Or is it User talk:71.191.145.35? Or is it User:Railfanner33 and, by extension, User:Ohnoitsjamie? All of us? Bbb23, GPTZero also suggests that the user's comments here are AI-generated--in case you were wondering where that prose came from. Drmies (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Per Wikipedia, GPTZero is also notorious for its alarming amount of false positives. Since that was the first point of alleged verification, I believe you answered the question you posed in the fourth sentence above. Your galloping paranoia is both humorous and quite disconcerting. I have no issue whatsoever with any other Wiki users cited in this exchange. Your tone is juvenile, belligerent and acutely boorish. Remember that we cannot all strive to be Steven Pruitt. Feel free to run this paragraph through the GPTZero filtration mechanism.
- To User talk:Ohnoitsjamie's point: as an admitted WP:GNOME, I will make an effort to achieve consensus in the pursuit of enhancing coherence, brevity and clarity within plot narrative structures that veer into somewhat "hideous, verbose prose" territory (I will tone down the academic verbiage). Please note that I will only aim for consensus to avoid mitigate instances of misinterpretation by WP:SYSOP as WP:VANDAL. We certainly do not want to run the risk of being the subject of discussions within editorials of similar nature: Wikipedia’s volunteer editors are fleeing online abuse. Cheers, mates. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 14:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Your tone is juvenile, belligerent and acutely boorish.
I believe that answers your question, Drmies, as to the target of the user's attack. @Wk3v78k23tnsa, you're very close to an indefinite block as WP:NOTHERE, among other problems, so I strongly urge you to keep your pompous, pretentious prose - whether AI-generated or your own - to yourself, particularly in articles but also in discussions (all editors must discuss issues in a collaborative, constructive fashion).--Bbb23 (talk) 14:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)- just fyi, Wk3v78k23tnsa is at it again...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Broom-Stick_Bunny&diff=prev&oldid=1222564579 Chafe66 (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- GPTZero is not "notorious for its alarming amount of false positives." (I assume you mean frequency of false positives.) First, the WP article you cite (GPTZero) only says that the false positives have "been the source of criticism," and elsewhere quotes another source which claims a 20% false positive rate. However, in this peer-reviewed article (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10519776/), the FP rate is only 10%. Not bad! So in essence their claim of AI generated content by "you" has a probability of being wrong of around 10-20%. That makes the AI attribution worth mentioning. After looking at your edits, I earlier wondered the same thing... Chafe66 (talk) 08:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- So, quick question. First of all, this text is 100% AI-generated, according to GPTZero. That's not a thing we do here. Second, ""hideous, verbose prose" only to individuals exhibiting deficiencies in fundamental reading comprehension abilities"--is that individual me? Or is it User talk:71.191.145.35? Or is it User:Railfanner33 and, by extension, User:Ohnoitsjamie? All of us? Bbb23, GPTZero also suggests that the user's comments here are AI-generated--in case you were wondering where that prose came from. Drmies (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- You forgot your modesty.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, Drmies, good thing (sort of) that I have this user on my watchlist because you forgot to sign, so the ping didn't work. That IP looks like a proxy to me, no? I guess I'm trying to understand why Wk3v78k23tnsa's (why do we allow usernames like this?) block hasn't been changed to sitewide and indefinitely. As for your comment about butts, nope, I don't remember, sorry.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Bbb23, this one was particularly foolish--do you remember when people were writing those funny summaries of "I like Big Butts"? Note the insult, above, about intelligence. CU does not confirm them with User talk:24.206.78.50 but I have technical reasons to believe that they are the same, besides insults like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmies (talk • contribs)
Orphaned non-free image File:HerecomesGrump TC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:HerecomesGrump TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LetssingWithPopeye34.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:LetssingWithPopeye34.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:HoneymoneyTC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:HoneymoneyTC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Vince headshot64.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Vince headshot64.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SnowBusinessTC.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SnowBusinessTC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 9 October 2024 (UTC)