User talk:Thingg/archive 6

Holidaybreak plc article

Hi there, I notice you removed my tag for speedy deletion due to advertising on this article. Having read the link you provided, I agree I was mistaken in placing it there. Mainly, the problem is I think only a section of the article is advertising, ie, the description of brands that plc owns. The article itself is uncited, partial nonsense but not bad enough to merit deletion.

I didn't want to delete or massively edit that whole section (Brands and Product Portfolio) without someone more experienced getting involved for fear of starting an edit war ... it has most likely been written by someone with some connection to the firm(s).

Not sure what the appropriate course of action is? write a proposed alternative in the discussion page for comment and then move it on after a few days?

Sorry to be a newbie pain, I've only really done small edits previously and that article clearly needs a major rewrite, which is probably going to antagonise the original authors!

Thank you!

Thank you, Thingg, for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Cheers! Maxis ftw (talk) 04:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: revert

no problem. actually it's kind of poetic justice I suppose; you've been owning me to all the big reverts so far... Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 04:12, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thingg. Why did you revert to previous version of "All in the Family" text and thus delete my addition: *In the 1973 Episode "Henry's Farewell", Gloria predicts that the United States will elect a black man as President before it ever elects a female President. Please explain why this needed to be deleted. 99.170.12.120 (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama - Biracial/Black

4 November 2008 (diff) (hist) . . Public image of Barack Obama‎; 05:42 . . (+1) . . Thingg (Talk | contribs) (*null edit* if it were to be included, it wouldn't be in this article as it has absolutely nothing to do with his political positions)

The article is not about his political positions. It is the about Barack Obama's public image and specifically his Origins and Identity on Race and Culture. Is it offensive to call him Biracial, is that something to be ashamed of?

Xcaceres

Xcaceres (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Can you semi protect my user and user talk page for a bit. I seem to be under attack. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 06:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xelix

when I tried to delete the article on User:Xelix I was told that my change was unproductive and vandalism, however it appears to me that the article could constitute libel, and lacks any sort of verifiability in contradiction of wikipedia's policies. I would like to ask that you therefore remove the article, and keep these principles of wikipedia in mind when evaluating similar situations in the future. If the accusations presented in the article are justified the original author may repost the article with evidence as to the authenticity of the information. I also question it's relevance to an encyclopedia such as this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.124.81.169 (talk) 06:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OLE for process control - removal of external links

I noticed you removed the external links listed below from the OPC page. These external links provide good information about OPC. Far better than provided by the OPC foundation.

Access OPC server from any OS via Open Source Java library http://www.opcconnect.com/ - Unofficial OPC Resource Center

Free test OPC Server + OPC Client from MatrikonOPC Free tools for OPC development from ICONICS Free, simple and easy OPC DA Client LightOPC - free OPC server developers toolkit FatRat Library - free OPC server developers toolkit

OpenOPC - Open Source OPC client development in Python

Khrasmussen (talk) 06:50, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kodimunai

Dear Thingg ... i have not heard from you on the "kodimunai" article item no.81 in talk page. Please help... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mail4loys (talk • contribs) 10:37, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:There_she_is!!#Don.27t_revert_please and undo your unjustified revert. Can't do it myself as I got enough needless warnings for a constructive contribution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1Thracian86 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

I thought you deserve this for your hard work on vandalism, you always beat me! Ha ha! Andy (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andy (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

You are very welcome. Andy (talk) 19:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello

you just threatened to block me because of vandalism. i think made a mistake by putting my message on the user's user page didn't I?if i did, im sorry. User:Megastrike14 -Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.44.28 (talk) 19:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down!

I'm trying to ease my way back into RC patrol and some speedy person keeps beating me to the punch. Keep up the good work.

Oh, your talk page would probably thank you for archiving it. --GraemeL ^(talk) 19:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted without nomination...

You say that you nominate the page for deletion... but then just delete. I was not intending for my page on OrangeCup to read like an ad... How would you suggest the page reads... all I put on the page was links to people who have talked about it, what flavors they offer and programs they promote and competitor info... How should it read? How is Starbucks any different? Please explain... --FroYoNut (talk) 20:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

He did have an awesome mustache

[[1]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.125.139.137 (talk) 00:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping vandalism information up-to-date

Can you keep "This user page has been vandalized..." (at the bottom left corner of my userpage) up-to-date? -- IRP ☎ 00:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thingg. You have new messages at User talk:IRP#Re: vandalism update.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{newmessages}} template.

Barack Obama prot

Was it unprotected? Last action was by Raul restoring full protection. Everyme 00:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good thing you were so quick. But speaking of protection, would you mind semiprotecting Al Franken? There have been ~4 vandalism edits now, the direction is very clear. Just for the next 12 hours. Everyme 01:08, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, one less thing to worry about. Will try keep an eye on it nevertheless -- in between making coffee and switching between CBS/CNN/etc. :) Everyme 01:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. Fairly accurate as of right now. But give me another hour or so and I'll be more like Fry approaching his 100th cup. Everyme 01:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of Barack Obama

Hey, I saw your comment in the protection log for Barack Obama... it was supposed to be protected, I think when Raul placed the last protection he forgot that America is not on GMT and polling places are still going to be open for up to five hours! Thanks for your dilligence. ~ L'Aquatique! [^talk/_stats] 01:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, sorry!

I accidently reverted your revert. I'm so sorry! Maxis ftw (talk) 03:38, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Moore

I reverted because the souring does not support the edit(s) made. Thank you. Dynablaster (talk) 03:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's basically vandalising the page at this point, and he's going to be banned for 3R soon (and ignoring talk page quotes). Feel free to undo his revision while I find someone to ban him.JJJ999 (talk) 03:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly explain your reasoning for re-adding improperly sourced material. Thankyou. Dynablaster (talk) 04:54, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because you have been active since I posed a question, I will ask you again: Why did undo my edit? Dynablaster (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If it is your intention not to respond, then kindly refrain from tagging my talk page in future. Thankyou. Dynablaster (talk) 14:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hasty

Excuse me? Grsz ¹¹ ^→Review! 04:09, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean this?

Hey Thingg. Just wondering if you meant to make this edit to that page? ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 10:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :P. I thought it was a bit odd when it randomly appeared :P. Or if it was meant to be going to me or something. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:01, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

I'm narrowing the sub cat!!! 58.176.0.132 (talk) 15:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You ought to be ashamed of yourself

You ought to be ashamed of yourself [2]209.20.66.205 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 15:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Bush / Obama

Sorry for my mystake. :( Alegreen (talk) 16:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes.

Thanks for your support in my RFA and all of the help you have given me!!
• If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy •
·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 21:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

II_MusLiM_HyBRiD_II

Hi, do you own a bot named II_MusLiM_HyBRiD_II? It automatically reverted a change I made, but I can't even leave it a message to explain why I changed it back. 69.121.221.174 (talk) 01:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this note and figured I could help out. II_MusLiM_HyBRiD_II is a user, not a bot. Wikipedia policy requires bots user names to make it clear it's a bot. If you go to his talk page, you'll see a red box that says "if you can't leave a message here, then post here." I recommend trying that. :) Cheers, happy editing! ~Pip 2 andahalf 04:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 69.121.221.174 (talk) 15:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Backgammon history

Can you please explain why you reverted my amendments to backgammon.

Tables is only sensibly phrased as similar to backgammon because there are so many more people who know of backgammon than they do of any other tables form. That is why I believe that it is stronger to say that Tables is a game of which Backgammon is the best-known example.

There is no 'proof' that Senet is a backgammon type so it is safer and actually better to say as I did 'there may be similarities'.

The same with the Burnt City reference - the board and pieces are clearly not actually backgammon-style so the proper statement is again 'there may be similarities'.

I would not have changed the wording without reason. I find a simple reversion to be unhelpful especially with no notation in the talk section of the reason. Can you tell me why the less precise wording is better.

I have noted that much the same sort of simplification occurs in other game articles as regards historic background. I find that H.J.R.Murray is usefully academic in much of his research as he avoids such statements as 'Senet is this or that' in favour of 'It is uncertain but Senet may .....'. Salisbury-99 (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All in the Family: revert

Hi Thingg. Why did you revert to previous version of "All in the Family" text and thus delete my addition: *In the 1973 Episode "Henry's Farewell", Gloria predicts that the United States will elect a black man as President before it ever elects a female President. Please explain why this needed to be deleted. 99.170.12.120 (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Okay, I cant wait!! Lol ^^ II MusLiM HyBRiD II ^{Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja} 22:35, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but, I might go on a long wikibreak or either go onto semi-retirement or a perm. retirement soon. Sorry Thingg. I didnt want this to happen, i didnt know if this happening was even possible... Cheers. G ! B B i 3 ^{I4m 733t0rz} 00:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really..School is kinda taking advantage of my time now, since i just started high school. So yeah. Idk atm, i might retire perm. or take a long break. Sorry. G ! B B i 3 ^{I4m 733t0rz} 22:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well bad news, but im retiring now. I put semi, but now its for good. So yeah, later. All the best thingg. M.H.^{ITrue Romace iS Dead} 00:40, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help in solving a difference of opinion

Hi, congats on becoming admin, I and one of my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of bias on a controversial topic Operation Blue Star, the summary of dispute can be found at [3], please let us know your views so that we can solve the dispute amicably. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 01:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Righteous Harmony Society

Hi Thingg --

Sorry if I merged the Righteous Harmony Society too quickly, though I did give a brief explanation. Still, I'm not clear why you undid it, and would be glad to learn from you. I integrated the material into the Boxer Rebellion article, where it seems to be more useful than a stub on its own.

All the best ch (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 12

Hey, just so I feel generous about having an account on Wikipedia for ~~almost~~ three years, would you like to leave {{First Edit Day}} on my talk page on the given date in the title? I could have also left this over on JD's (you know who I'm taking about...) talk page, but I've been leaving him so much messages I need to be somewhere else! :-P SchfiftyThree ^(talk!) 23:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

...for reverting vandalism to my talk page. Cheers, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 20:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Video in a BLP?

There's been a lot of scuffling over at Thomas Muthee, though I think things are fairly calm now. One question remains for me, though. Where is the Wikipolicy that discourages direct linking to a (verified) video of the article's subject as a citation? Consensus there was that we don't have much in the way of transcript, and he's so contentious that I'm not going to argue it, but I'm curious for the future's sake. Regards. FangedFaerie (Talk | Edits) 11:13, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, none of them are self-published. There are a few online available via the churches he visited, and there are some DVDs made by a friend of his. I'm not sure how I feel about this issue. In a formal paper, for example, a viable, reliable source is allowed to be in video format, provided the citation is right. I realize the special problems we run into online, however, with YouTube and whatnot. Hmm... Thanks for trying to answer, but it leaves me with more questions than answers. It certainly gets hot and heavy on BLPs. Ah well. Regards. FangedFaerie (Talk | Edits) 00:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Can you please delete Ouvement populaire ivoirien du Grand Ouest? Regards --Againme (talk) 18:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done (although you might have been able to just move it to a different title if it was just a typo). Frank | talk 18:51, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!!! In this case, it was to big of a typo to move it: Ouvement instead of Mouvement :)

--Againme (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what "too big" would mean; you could have moved the page to Mouvement populaire ivoirien du Grand Ouest. No big deal, but it would not have required admin intervention. Frank | talk 19:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you reverted my changed on the page on EML Kalev (M414)

I changed the word minelayer by minesweeper what you reverted. Kalev is a minesweeper as it is intended to sweep mines however it was also capable to lay mines. "minesweeper" is also the word that is used in communication by the meremuuseum ("In the harbour you can also visit the minesweeper Kalev ...". This matches also the former name Binnenminensuchboot (inshore minesweeping boat) as what it served in the German navy before. If you agree to these arguments I ask you to repace the word minelayer by minesweeper again. /regards

Traditional Chinese Medicine edit

Dear Admin,

This morning (11/14 around 11:30 am PST) I added several paragraphs to the "Traditional Chinese Medicine" wiki page. I am currently studying ancient Chinese history and culture and was struck by some of the detail left out of the "branches" category on the page. I have no personal vested interest in promoting either TCM or CCM, but I felt that given the visibility of TCM on the wiki page and elsewhere online that this would be a good forum to add descriptions of this other branch of Chinese medicine. The only criteria for deletion I can possibly imagine qualified my addition for deletion was the inclusion of two college names. I furthermore am willing to delete these college names for fear that they read like an endorsement. However, my intention was simply to provide a bit of voice for a very real science and underdog in the field of Chinese medicine. If you deleted the post for other reasons, please explain your reason so that I can edit the passage appropriately. I wrote several paragraphs, all of which is of an educational intent.

Thank you, Tim

Ken Keeler

Hi; can't figure out why you re-deleted my reworded restoration of "Theory of Underpants" material in article "Ken Keeler" after its original deletion by Scorpion0422. My comment in the Revision line gave what I think is a reasonable justification for its inclusion. I'm no expert on Wikipedia terminology, but it appears from the "HG" link in your Revision History entry that my work was considered vandalism. Explanation would be much appreciated. 76.94.45.139 (talk) 23:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

208.75.45.130 (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 208.75.45.130 (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delvelop a page for 300 things peanuts form into? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.178.109.149 (talk) 23:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the plural of useerbox is userboxes - NOT userboxen. What are you, a German Nazi? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwc4jwc4 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like my user page? LOL! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwc4jwc4 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Rollback

Hi, i have been reverting changes for a while and am finding it hard to keep having to refresh the pages for recent changes.

A friend who also Patrols recent changes segestes using Huggle, in which i have since downloaded it. According to huggle i do not have the rollback permission, and yet i have been using rollback on pages.

help?

Many Thanks, Kira

Kirachinmoku (talk) 18:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WMRO (AM)

Please "REMOVE" all content on WMRO (AM) Gallatin, Tennessee. The facts listed are all WRONG! If it is not removed in a timley manor, I will seek my legal counsel to file a civil suit against this site.

Thank You, Scott Bailey WMRO Radio, Gallatin, TN —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmroradio (talk • contribs) 18:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User notified about Wikipedia policy on legal threats and notice posted to WP:AN/I. --GraemeL ^(talk) 19:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at this...

Recognize something that doesn't belong there? -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 20:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repeal of Lightning Force.

I was trying to write an article of a San Luis Obispo group that has helped the community greatly through the years. This group has mentored kids not only in the community, but also in places as far away as Africa. I was only merely trying to start the article so I could receive my ten edits so later I could add pictures. However, you came and deleted it immediately. Please stop deleting my articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ma.cueto (talk • contribs) 03:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

American Hunters and Shooters Association

Thingg, Special:Contributions/LBZoeller looks concerning to me. Another editor at the subj artcile has "outed" Zoeller as an AHSA employee in an edit summary, and Zoeller certainly appears to be a single-purpose account. It looks like a low-level edit war is ongoing over the portrayal of AHSA as a gun control group, and Zoeller may be a polite POV pusher, trying suppress RS information that appears distasteful to current AHSA management. Just a heads up on what I've observed, since it looks like you've interacted with him before. Jclemens (talk) 21:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, and just to make sure no one starts talking about harassment (not accusing you of accusing harassment, Jclemens, just want make sure passersby know what's going on), LBZoeller outed himself. I'm not sure who their consultant is. --tc2011 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! I'd not seen that edit. That's a part of the puzzle I didn't have. Jclemens (talk) 22:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd forgotten about that too. I wonder if he really is who he says he is... Either way, I warned him about making large, controversial edits without gaining proper consensus first, and I have the page on my watchlist. Hopefully he'll start to follow the rules now. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 22:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CoughPHP deletion

i was working on an article for a web application framework called coughPHP. you deleted it, citing blatant advertising.

i am not part of the development team of coughphp, nor do i stand to make any sort of meaningful gains or notoriety if this (free, open source) framework becomes more popular than it is, i've simply done projects with it in the past and prefer it to other web frameworks. i merely wish to add it to the existing documentation/catalog wikipedia keeps of these types of frameworks.

if there's going to be an article about coughPHP on wikipedia in the future, what prerequisites have to be in place? how can the entry be more encyclopedic (and less advertising-seeming)? what sort of references would help back up its validity?

also, how are these pages allowed to stay under your criteria?:

thanks so much! Erikswedberg (talk) 02:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gaucho Theory Deletion

You deleted Gaucho Theory. This was quite upsetting, mainly because I followed the guidelines and put a hangon tag in the page, and then was in the middle of typing a reason in the Talk Page. Yet, before I could even save my reasoning, you deleted the page, thus leaving the hard work of writing out a justification meaningless. Why do we have a hangon tag if you don't respect it? Furthermore, you cited vandalism as your reasoning, and there was none according to Wikipedia guidelines. You need to at least provide a valid reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisehearted (talk • contribs) 03:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In your rebuttal to my statement, you didn't link to a Wikipedia guideline or offer any official reason for your deletion of this article. You also did my other concern, what is the point of adding the hangon tag so that one can offer a rebuttal on the talk page, if you are going to go through and delete the article without even reading the talk page or allowing time for comments.

Wisehearted (talk) 03:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there was no vandalism, it was a well researched article... about something that had only existed for a few hours and was probably not noteworthy . It was not "blatant and obvious misinformation" or "page-move vandalism." [[4]]. The page deserves a full deletion process. --Phiren (talk) 04:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your reply is fair enough, but why couldn't you offer such an opinion on the Talk page before deleting the article? Is there no room for discussion on things on the actual talk page? It doesn't make sense that I need to come to your Talk page to discuss such a thing, thus taking away the opportunity from other interested parties to comment. Furthermore, you still haven't offered why you deleted it as "Vandalism" as this doesn't meet the Wikipedia definition of Vandalism. Also, why can you not leave the talk page if you see potential value in an article somewhere down the road, is it a rule that you need to delete the talk page at the same time as the main page. Surely, you must see how when you take a unilateral action like you did without communication or taking into consideration public comment, and fail to cite a valid reason, it looks more like censorship than like a genuine effort to keep non-valuable content off of Wikipedia.

Wisehearted (talk) 04:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing it back to full deletion process. I'm glad we could hash this out.

Wisehearted (talk) 04:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Album deletion

Heya, not that I really think it was that great of an article, but you deleted Born Into this with an invalid reason. We actually do have an article about the musician. I was about to decline the speedy, but you deleted before I could. --El on ka 03:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd say restore/stub it. You also might want to undelete the Gaucho article. It didn't look like clear vandalism, and there was already an AfD going on it, so I'd let that run its course. --El on ka 03:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, good point. Well, if you'd like to leave it deleted, that's your call, though you might want to formally "close" the AfD. If anyone really disagrees with it (and I have no strong preference), they can always take it to DRV. --El on ka 03:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I only noticed it because I was curious about one of the few entries left under the A7 category on my admin "to do" list. I figured somebody must have been working hard to keep the CSD category clear, to have that few entries left! Was that you? --El on ka 04:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, then good work! And yes, they're like potato chips, it's hard to stop at just one. ;) And, once you get on a roll, it gets really hard to step away from it, especially because it fills up again so fast. There's that addictive nature of trying to keep the category "clean". :) --El on ka 04:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect deletion

Please re-create the page Hermosillo Stamping & Assembly. You deleted it without giving me a chance to improve the page and take care of any concerns people may have. I protested but I didn't see anyone give a reason as to why it was deleted other than two people didn't like it. Pages on similar subjects are common. See List of GM factories for a giant list, many of which are more sparse than the page I created and fully intended to improve.--Analogue Kid (talk) 04:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect deletion of Exari

Please recreate Exari. This article was still being built, this was flagged and I had asked to be given more time to address any concerns raised, of which there were none. I don't feel that 6 hours in the middle of the night is enough time to improve an article which I had stated would be improved. My aim was to provide a place for the various open source projects which Exari have been involved in, which is informative to Document Automation specialists.

--Iamthenewno2 (talk) 06:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I'm with Iamthenewno2 on this one, I don't think Exari was a good speedy candidate. It was pretty well fleshed out, it had sources,[5] the editor that was working on it had a long history of good contribs, and there was even an "expansion" tag on it. Personally, I would have declined as "Declining speedy, though if there is disagreement, try prod or AfD instead." So I'd recommend undeleting, or if you disagree strongly, userfying. --El on ka 16:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Passion Pit (band)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Passion Pit (band). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 09:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect deletion of Stopka, Desktop search tool

Please re-create the page Stopka, Desktop search tool and return it into list of List_of_search_engines Desktop search engines. Before page creation I ask here Talk:List_of_search_engines#StopKa to add information. I protested cause my information is truth and your deletion hide this from others. You did not start discusion to check my info. No one told here that my info is a lie. Please return my info back --Vyemialyanchyk (talk) 09:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look at this one, and support Thingg's deletion. The page wasn't so much an article, as an advertisement. See WP:CORP. --El on ka 16:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. your point is clear, but I should start from some point and get the article better. I try to read A7 deletion reason attentive and I saw this: A7 applies only to articles about web content or articles on people and organizations themselves, not articles on their books, albums, software and so on. This is article about software - so deletion according this rule is a wrong deletion. I propose you restore my article without adding it into the list of List_of_search_engines Desktop search engines till I make the arcticle better. --Vyemialyanchyk (talk) 17:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section

Hello! I don't understand why you deleted my page. I wasn't even able to finish the translation. I think this is a very important piece of information for iPod users who look for a way to retrieve their music. It has external links and internal references. --Malulux (talk) 15:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section

I notice you have deleted the page I started on The eLearning Guild for "blatant copyright infringement." I guess you didn't read my note on the Talk page. I am The eLearning Guild's editor. We own the copyright to the text I had on the page. I would have appreciated the opportunity to make this clear to you.

WmBrandon (talk) 15:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Night of Corruption

Hello, I'm the creator of the page "Night of Corruption". I'm one of the members and I am here to inquire about you deleting the page. I know you are an admin and you thought that the page held no importance, but I felt that it was a decent way to boost my bands publicity. Everything I said on wikipedia was absolutely true about the band, so I feel it was somewhat necessary to help me and the guys out with it.

I ask if I may please re-create the page or if you can boot the page back onto the site and keep it on there to help the band out. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks for your time. Bye.

Thaxonyn (talk) 12:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second Amendment

Thank you for fixing this page. I was offended by what I had seen and I feel that I need to dedicate my time to using paper books until wikipedia can be monitored more closely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.191.28.212 (talk) 04:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC nr 3 bates method article scientific research.

Sorry to bother you, but the quality of an article is under threat. If you have time can you take a look at RFC nr 3 in the talkpage of the bates method article. See : [[6]] . It is about mention objective results presented by ophthalmology about the Woods results. These results represent perfectly why the Batesmethod / NVI is controversial. It presents negative, positive and neutral results. The scientific reference which confirms the BM / NVI is controversial : [[7]]. These Woods results have been presented for a while but aren now removed !!! Please comment if you agree or do not agree by providing your arguments on which it is based. See also the listed arguments at this moment. Appreciate your objective comment. regards, Seeyou (talk) 11:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Thanks for the rollback privileges! SheepNotGoats (Talk) 15:52, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

returning the favour

		The Half Barnstar
		[8] - Well I can't say you don't deserve the other half - you get the bonus points for image deletion though--Jac16888 (talk) 02:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: James Hunter (disambig)

Thanks for the note, Thingg :) I apologise for going through all that. I didn't realise that there was already a disambig page for this dude, so I marked a hangon cause someone was gonna CSD it. Guess it'll teach me to read stuff next time! :D Thanks anyhow, and I appreciate the contact. Thor Malmjursson (talk) 03:36, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion template on US Post Office-Mount Vernon

You are correct that User:Treyert hasn't been banned (or even blocked) from editing yet, but this user has been confirmed to be a sockpuppet of banned user User:Jvolkblum. The user who made additional edits to the article, User:Blusterybrew, is also confirmed to be a sockpuppet of the same banned user. See Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Jvolkblum. --Orlady (talk) 03:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Next time I use that template, I guess I had better remember to identify the banned user in my edit summary. --Orlady (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Arrows1974.jpg

Hi, I noticed that you speedy deleted the above image that was listed on WP:PUI. I think you were incorrect in deleting this as a blatant copyright violation. I think it is quite likely that the image falls within {{PD-Pre1978}} (and even if it didn't, I would hardly consider this image blatant). Would you please undelete the image? Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly Commnt reply

I love friendly comments! Lol, thanks. Gabr-el 05:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section

I noticed you were involved in deleting several articles because they were created by a sockpuppet. I am wondering why you would remove the base articles that all referenced historic sites that are awaiting article creation. Yes, the stated reason is that removal was due to creation by a creation by a banned user, however neither the articles nor the content would be cause for any administrative concern if not for the 'stirring of the pot' by specified editor(s). Im speaking as the voice a larger group who are all of similar mind. Sincerely - H. Prinn (Scarlet Support Network) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoGarmani (talk • contribs) 06:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. I understand and agree with your explanation and rationale. I also think that it sometimes proves necessary to 'ignore the rules' in order to uphold the fundamental principles of the site, and to bring resolution to issues that are unusual or out of the ordinary.

Anyway, thanks again for responding to my query! —Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoGarmani (talk • contribs) 19:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TweetyCoaster Little Lady Baby DDoS Shield

Hi. I tagged this with Twinkle just as you deleted it, and so I've inadvertently recreated it. Could you delete it again? By the way, it's not a copyvio (see article 4 of the Google Terms of Service). It may well be non-notable. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks. I closed the AfD that I opened. You're well within your rights to speedy it, since it's non-notable. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:28, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrés Duque

Collapsed. Click to expand »

Please re-create the page for the gay Latino activist Andrés Duque which you deleted today with the following comment: (A7 (bio): No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion)

While I understand that my article was short and only had two references, I disagree with your assessment. I have assembled seven additional online sources discussing his contributions as the founder and director of Mano a Mano, not to mention his important role in a number of additional LGBT organizations.

Here are my additional sources:

(1) San Pedro, Emilio (BBC News, Americas). " Gay Latinos 'minority twice over'" (April 29, 2008). http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7364658.stm

Article features Andrés Duque as spokesperson and expert on gay Latino issues.

(2) GLAAD (Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) Latino Media Kit, "Media Contacts for Latina/o LGBT Community" http://www.glaad.org/poc/latina/latin_kit/contacts.php

Describes Andrés Duque as follows:

Director Mano a Mano (212) 584-9306 aduque@latinoaids.org Area of expertise: Political asylum, media and activism

Born in Colombia, South America, Andrés Duque is the director of Mano a Mano, a network of Latino LGBT organizations and activists, and a board member of the Empire State Pride Agenda, the preeminent lesbian and gay civil rights organization in New York State. He also sits on the board of the Guillermo Vasquez Independent Democratic Club of Queens (GVIDCQ) and the People of Color Political Action Club, and is a founding member of the Audre Lorde Project and the Colombian Lesbian and Gay Association (COLEGA). He is recognized throughout the United States and Latin America for his activism in the Latino LGBT community, and was named one of Out Magazine's top 100 activists in 2002.

(3) Joe Crea, "Many voices, one language: New York’s Latino groups bring advocacy to several nationalities." New York Blade Online (September 10, 2004), http://www.nyblade.com/2004/9-10/locallife/main/index.cfm

Discusses the importance of Mano a Mano as follows:

"Affiliated with the group is Mano a Mano, a network of organizations and activists based in New York that work to increase the well-being, visibility and political power of the Latino gay community.

Spearheaded by Latino activist Andres Duque, Mano a Mano’s director, the group addresses many of the issues that affect New York’s many gay Hispanics, such as AIDS prevention, as well as general health care, housing, immigration, language access, same-sex violence, homophobia, coming out, visibility and cultural awareness. Mano a Mano also supports the development of Latino organizations in New York through technical and developmental means."

(4) Citron, Jamie. "LGBT Latino/a and African American Leaders Endorse Barack Obama" Jamie Citron's Blog, My.BarackObama, Apr 14th, 2008 http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jcitron/gGBpD5

Includes Andrés Duque in list of prominent LGBT Latino/a leaders who endorsed Obama, and feature Duque's comments stating the following:

"I am supporting Barack Obama because he has steadfastly refused to play politics as usual during his campaign,” said Andrés Duque, New York LGBT activist. “Time and time again, Senator Obama has refused to play wedge politics on topics such as equal rights, race, immigration or any number of issues that others have employed to divide and conquer potential voters. Instead, he has reminded those who will listen that we are all Americans and deserving of a President that will serve all and not just a few. As a Latino gay man born in Colombia, now a United States citizen, it will be my honor to call Senator Obama my president."

(5) Van Bramer, Jimmy. "A Different Vision of Activism: A Millennium March On Washington Perspective." LGNY (April 25, 2000), Reprinted on Queers for Economic Justice Website http://qej.tripod.com/qej2/id22.html

Quote Andrés Duque's opinion on the Queers for Economic Justice Network:

"Andres Duque, coordinator of Mano A Mano, a network of Latino LGBT organizations and individuals, has participated in Network meetings and attended ESPA lobby day. According to Duque, being able to speak on the Work-Study bill was a welcome event.

"Personally, these issues are ones that I really feel comfortable advocating for because they particularly affect the Latino community," he said.

For Duque the impact welfare reform has had upon immigrants, both documented and undocumented, has him concerned. "A lot of people who are in need do not have access to benefits. Many people are simply trying to get the benefits they used to have," Duque argued. "Now they are forced to wait time and time again on long times trying to prove time and time again who they are. The City is trying to push people off.""

(6) Southern Poverty Law Center, Intelligence Report (Spring 2002) "The Forgotten: Edgar Garzon, 35, Queens, N.Y." (Page 3) http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=247

Quotes Andrés Duque regarding murder of Edgar Garzón.

(7) Duggan, Dennis. "Gay Dems' New Voice." Newsday, July 30, 2002 http://www.newsday.com/mynews/ny-nydugg302803831jul30.story Archived at: LGBT PEOPLE OF COLOR MEDIA CLIPPINGS - August 6, 2002, http://groups.yahoo.com/group/latinolatinalgbtyouth/message/357

Quotes Duque discussing the Lesbian and Gay Democratic Club of Jackson Heights and the Guillermo Vazquez Independent Democratic Club of Queens:

" I asked Andres Duque, who is a member of both clubs, if a McCoy-Hatfield feud was in the making.

"I hope there isn't going to be any fighting between them," said Duque, who has been the spokesman for the family of Edgar Garzon, the 35-year-old set designer who was beaten to death as he walked home from a gay bar in Queens in August. Garzon's murder remains unsolved.

Duque said the new club will reach out to a more diverse part of the lesbian and gay community. "I think the other club tried to do that but they just didn't have the connections," he said."

Thanks.--Mgdelarosa (talk) 09:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to ask for two favors: (1) could I have access to what I wrote on Andrés Duque so that I can continue to work on it? I forgot to copy, and I wrote it directly here (on Wikipedia). Could you post it in my talk space? Or email it to me? Or recreate so I can copy it? (2) You mention that I only have one reliable source, which one was it? I am working on getting more reliable sources to satisfy Wikipedia's notability rules. Thanks.--Mgdelarosa (talk) 20:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The text was not in the sandbox as you indicated. Please send to martingdelarosa at gmail dot com or put on my talk page if this is possible. Or if not tell me at what time I should look for it in the sandbox before it disappears. Thanks.--Mgdelarosa (talk) 07:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arrows1974.jpg

Just to let you know I have emailed the photographer. I highly doubt he uploaded the image or allowed someone else to upload it and release it to PD. Also doubtful is the {{PD-Pre1978}} claim as well. I noted this at the PUI discussion as well. Thanks. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stoya

You deleted Stoya earlier today for failing A7. It's back up. Can you tell me if the new one (which survived a Speedy) is any different in terms of being legible? Thanks.--CyberGhostface (talk) 04:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're going to have to explain why you deleted this article when it was properly referenced with reliable sources and the subject satisfies WP:PORNBIO with her award and nominations. I am going to ask for a deletion review. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you already reversed yourself so never mind. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BOD

Hello, noticed you deleted the Bitches of Death in here, and were wondering why?

Thank you!

What am I doing wrong?

You deleted my tomato turtle page...why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedimaster3410 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my article?

I dont see what is wrong with it. Please tell me what is wrong with it on my talk page and what I can do to fix it. Thanks. My article is Tomato turtle

--Jedimaster3410 (talk) 01:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)jedimaster3410[reply]

here you go

http://www.tatepublishing.com/bookstore/book.php?w=978-1-60696-371-5 http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Tomato-Turtle/Thomas-Strock/e/9781606963715 http://www.target.com/dp/1606963716/sr=1-1/qid=1227576779/ref=sr_1_1/185-7019680-3674366?ie=UTF8&index=target&rh=k%3Atomato%20turtle&page=1

now is my page legit? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedimaster3410 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--Jedimaster3410 (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)jedimaster3410[reply]

Im getting a tad bit ticked off

I read through the links and they said that having a product name or company as an article's title is not against wikipedia rules. Can you let me put up my article now. I also have proof that what im saying is real:

http://www.tatepublishing.com/bookstore/book.php?w=978-1-60696-371-5

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Tomato-Turtle/Thomas-Strock/e/9781606963715

http://www.target.com/dp/1606963716/sr=1-1/qid=1227576779/ref=sr_1_1/185-7019680-3674366?ie=UTF8&index=target&rh=k%3Atomato%20turtle&page=1

please reply on my talk and tell me what is so wrong directly PLEASE NOT THROUGH LINKS! I read the link and if we are going by them, I should be able to have that article up and running. Thanks for your help.

Jedimaster3410 (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)jedimaster3410[reply]

RfA thanks

		The RfA Barnstar
		Thingg, I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent Request for Adminship, which passed with 112 supports, 4 opposes and 5 neutrals. A special mention goes out to Stwalkerster and Pedro for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of ANI and AN to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the non-free content criteria and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply ask at my talk page and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :) The Helpful One 22:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste {{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}} and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

Assistance

Hello, The article you restored for me at User:Jhina5422/MIS LTD has been reworked abit could you look it over and give me advice on what should be added removed, redone so that it meets Wikipedia guidelines ect. - Jhina5422 (talk) 23:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Coming Home Network

Thingg,

I have been discussing this page with another administrated, it was tagged hangon and you delete without notice.

Tell me what is not note worthy about the Coming Home Network. The fact that since is conception almost 2000 men and women who are ordained have at great personal cost (both financial and personal) have converted the Catholic Church through the fellowship and support it offers? Moreover, thousands of laymen have found the same through its members?

Or that is covers the internet with nearly 20,000 hits just through it name, most of which through secondary sources. It is reviewed weekly on TV and radio. That its founder and president and the Network are directly and indirectly sited through other Wiki articles. There is a problem here, in your use of notability. Thanks --R Rodgers 01:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by CHNI (talk • contribs)

Can you elaborate on why my article Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation cannot meet wikipedia guide lines, I am having trouble finding any other sources and it is a college assignment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tandon1 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They don't get much speedier than that

You honored my speedy-delete db-r2 request for A History of Acting: On the face of it faster than I could notify the author. I'm not complaining, but I've never seen anything so fast. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:55, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Trouble

Hello, I am wondering why my article Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation will not meet wikipedia's requirementgs to stay online. I cannot find any other sources and I have to have this posted for a college assignment in sociology. thanks Tandon1 (talk) 02:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I may barge in: According to the deletion log, the first time it was posted it was speedy-deleted because there was no indication that this group met wikipedia's notability requirements. The second time, it was deleted as a copyright violation - copyright violations are illegal and your professor would likely flunk your project outright. The third time it was deleted as "blatant advertising." You need to ask yourself "does this subject matter meet Wikipedia's notability requirements." If it does not, find another topic. If your professor insists you get an article on this topic into Wikipedia, then step 1 is to get the organization noticed by the press enough that it becomes notable, not an easy task. If your professor will let you do another article instead, you might consider joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery and creating badly-needed articles. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: heh oops (Arcade console)

No problem, wikipedia editing is a group effort, keep making the edits you see fit! I wouldn't have even added it to the caption, but for the fact that there's no reason to use that photo except for it being an early one. PyroGamer (talk) 03:33, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this is stupid

look im the author of a PUBLISHED BOOK, distriuted by THE LARGEST DISTRIBUTER IN THE WORLD. I think I deserve to have a wikipedia article. If you read any of the links I gave you youll see that it proves what im saying is true. Is Amazon, or Barnes and Noble, or Target not a reliable 3rd party. Listen, im not trying to be rude at all (sorry if I it is coming out like that) but If you want to write that article...that is all fine and dandy with me. BTW please no links explain everything in your own words if you dont mind.

Jedimaster3410 (talk) 03:44, 26 November 2008 (UTC)jedimaster3410[reply]

Image:Arrows1974.jpg

It is fine to CSD Image:Arrows1974.jpg now. I heard back from the photographer. He says, in part, "I do not contribute to Wikipedia and didn't upload any image of Arrows. There is no doubt that this image is my copyright as the original author and this is something I am quite clear about having taken legal advice from leading music business lawyers in the past." I will change the tag if i need to, or you can just take care of it. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I see that you deleted the entry for Wheeltug Plc, the company that is developing the WheelTug for the Boeing 737NG that will begin being deployed on Delta Air Lines fleet of Boeing 737NGs beginning 2010.

As this company will be drastically changing the ground operation for airports around the world, how is it that this does not meet the guidelines?

Sincerely, and Curioiusly,

Aaron Bianco (Chovesh) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chovesh (talk • contribs) 13:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, and question.

Thank you for restoring to the Wheeltug page to my section where I can work on it.

I'm actually glad you view it as 'very nearly' failing the notabiltiy rules. :-)

I tried to keep the article neutral and not promotional; however at present, most of the links are press releases by various companies - except for the very recent article by editor Frank Markus of Motor Trend magazine. [9]

These releases were all tied to what the company is doing, and that is where I get back to the 'notability' issue.

WheelTug Plc. is introducing a technology that will radically change the way airports operate, eliminating tugs used to back the planes out of the gate, significantly reduce fuel consumption, and save weight by not requiring planes carry the fuel that they would normally need for taxi, etc,. The technology will save cumulatively $60K per month per plane (and will be leased for half that savings) and in order to keep the article from being promotional I did not include this 'monetary' fact even though net revenue is expected to exceed $200M/eyar.

The notability and visibilty of Wheeltug and Wheeltug Plc is expected to grow considerably in the next two years, with revenues (again, not mentioned in the article) expected to exceed $200M/year by 2012. This sort of revenue explosion in such a short period of time, is going to be very newsworthy, but may still not be enough to gain note in an industry which has been hit hard economicaly and has struggled for a very long time.

Futhermore, Delta Air Lines will, shortly before the delivery of the first units from WheelTug Plc, soon start including it in its own promotional campaign and empahsize not only the 'green' credibility it gains by being the only (and first) carrier to turn thier engines off for all ground operations, but also that they can get you out of the gate quicker as they no longer need to wait for a tug to push the plane backwards.

In particular, for military aircraft, by not having their engine on (in location like afghanistan) they won't be sucking in junk and causing FOD (Foreign Object Damage).

(quote) "However, I think that in this case, there might be enough material out there to put together a decent article on the company. "

It is expected that over the next 2-6 months that there will be several announcements by the company regarding several deals in the industry, and since this company will be changing the way an entire industry operates, I'm sure you will see why I see it's notability, even though its notability is not yet apparent to the majority of readers.

I would greatly appreciate your help or comments that would help me write a better entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chovesh (talk • contribs) 18:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know I'm not Thingg, but if I saw an article on this subject, no matter how well-written, that did not show that the subject itself was currently notable or had been notable in the past, I'd send it to Articles for deletion where it would probably go down to defeat. Future products can be currently notable, if they are mentioned enough in independent press. Your best bet is to draft the article on your own computer or, if notability will be achieved in the next month or two, as a subpage of your user page. Add references from independent, reliable sources as they appear in the press, then move the draft article to the main space after the subject matter becomes clearly notable. Wikipedia is supposed to be like a coincident or lagging indicator of notability, not a leading one. The fact that this product is run by a small, thinly-traded public company rather than an established, widely-traded one, plus the current economic crisis, increases the risk that this product, even if it is an otherwise-viable one, will not enjoy wide enough success to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. Time will tell. Also, read Wikipedia's conflicts of interest guide, why care should be taken when writing about the future, as well as the rest of what Wikipedia is not. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parrish & Heimbecker Ltd.

You deleted Parrish & Heimbecker Ltd. as a csd-a7. I had included a reference from the Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan which seemed like a good reference, and the company's size is an indicator of some notability. I wasn't the one who created the article, but when I saw that another editor had tagged the article as an advertisement, I tried to improve it. Please consider restoring the article. -- Eastmain (talk) 19:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Rothbort

Hi Thingg,

I just saw that you deleted my article on Samuel Rothbort. This has caused much anxiety to me since:

1) I am a senior citizen who can use a computer-however it is still a daunting task.

2) I wrote the biographical information which is used on the website samuelrothbort.com I would be happy to rephrase it if necessary, or I could have the site administrator contact you as well, or you could just delete the paragraph in question and reinstate the rest of the article which I don't have a copy of.

3) It is almost Thanksgiving and this has really put a damper on my holiday in New York.

Could you please put the information back up since I don't think I can do it again?

Happy Thanksgiving from Samandrose (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No notice/ discussion

I have a few problems with you deleting Michael Crowe, other than that I disagree with why you deleted it.

1. No Discussion: You never opened a discussion on this, and I hardly see that this article is good for Speedy Deletion.

2.No Notice: You never informed me of the deletion, which is kind of insulting.

3. I'd like to open the discussion here, because I know that if we start edit warring, you might lose Adminship.

Wikipedia:Peer review/Over the Edge (1999)/archive2

Hi Thingg, can you review the images on the Over the Edge (1999) article, and leave any comments on the peer review page above? Thank you.--Tru_co 22:24, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

your an admin right? this is kind of minor, but could you found out who placed BUTT! in the molasses page? I cook a whole lot, even though I'm a guy, and for some reason, it seems to stick out like a sore thumb. MidKnightHunter (talk) 17:03, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanksgiving

		Happy Thanksgiving!
		Happy Thanksgiving Thingg! May God bless you and your family on this day! Scapler (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what kind of site IS notable?

so what exacly IS a notable site. if I threw together a webpage is that notable? this is really dumb. what makes all the other childrens book "notable" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jedimaster3410 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jclemens RfA

		JClemens' RfA Thanks
		Thank you for participating in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 77 supporting and 2 opposing. Regardless of your position, I thank you for the time you took to examine my record and formulate your response. Jclemens (talk) 02:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert war assistance

Hi Thingg, I am hoping you can be of assistance. I am having an issue at the List of child prodigies article. Essentially I'm in a revert war with a handful of new accounts that appear to have a personal relationship with some subjects that I have removed from the list. I've thoroughly explained my reasoning and invited discussion, to no avail. This particular article is somewhat sensitive, because many edits reflect a biased personal view of the subject, including Proud Parents, narcissistic self-promotions, and the like. If you don't mind, could you take a look at the bottom of the talk page for the article, under "Current revert war" and "Maximiliano Arellano", and weigh in on the matter? Thanks. Freqsh0 (talk) 11:01, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS - That thanksgiving template appears to have broken your talk page :) Freqsh0 (talk) 11:10, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Thank you for cleaning up a mistake on my template for me! Scapler (talk) 23:07, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G11:Blatant Advertising - "Angel Sword"

Hello, You deleted a page I created titled "Angel Sword" as G11:Blatant Advertising.

I am in no way affiliated with Angel Sword. I was researching purchasing a sword and was comparing some Companies. Most promenently: Albion, Windlass, and Angel. There was no Wikipedia page for Angel Sword, so I created one, using "Hanwei_(sword_producer)" as a template.

Everything I listed on the page was factual, and important information that someone would want to know if researching Angel Sword as a swordsmith. How in fact should I make this page so it is not seen as advertising? Kazens (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The page in question was properly deleted under G11. It was nothing but advertising for a commercial producer of swords. Please read WP:CORP for information on what constitutes notability for a company; notability is one of the primary criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. Frank | talk 18:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Admin

Hi Thingg,

I would like to recreate the page that you have deleted[Independent Data Services (IDS)]. I am new to Wikipedia and all the jargons confuses me. Therefore I'd like to ask your opninions. While I rewrote the content of my page to suit the encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia of the below entry - it was deleted. I am not advertising the company nor its product but perhaps the way that it was written may allude to that in the first place. I want to provide a simple background idea about IDS. We have not that many links about the company and as such could only provide the some links related to IDS. Will the below information suffice and not considered as "Blatant Advertising"?

With best regards, Idsdatanet (talk) 03:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsed. Click to expand »

Products

IDS' products are tackled into 3 main categories:

Exploration and Production
Supply Chain Management; and
Data Visualisation and Knowledge Management.

IDS DataNet2 is built on a 'Rich Internet Application' platform using Web 2.0-compliant technologies and WITSML feeds to capture and deliver data via the web.

Notes

[http://www.oilvoice.com/post/Company_News_Release/IDS_DataNet_joins_forces_with_Global_Energy_Services/afa3940872.aspx IDS DataNet joins forces with Global Energy Services
IDS Fulfills Reporting Needs for SPD for New Chablis Prospect
[http://www.rushmorereviews.co.uk/email/Issue8.htm Rushmore Reviews: enabling Operators to 'Benchmark with the Best'
Rushmore Reviews
EIKOS System

External Links

IDS DataNet (Main Website)
Energistics - WITSML Energy Industry Standards

Categories : Exploration and Production software companies | Daily Morning Drilling Report software | Companies established in 1995 | Companies based in Asia, UK and Canada.

Thanks

Thank you for protecting my user page. At this time, I am leaving my talk page unprotected. However, if vandalism increases, I will ask for semi-protection there. Sincerely, Willking1979 (talk) 03:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of 3D Solar

I believe that "3D Solar receieved the 2005 Information Society Technologies Prize from the European Council for Applied Science, Technology and Engineering" is an indication of importance. I had previously prod'd it on the grounds of notability, but dismissed the idea of a speedy. Would you mind if I restored it and took it to AfD instead? Marasmusine (talk) 10:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No probs, cheers. Marasmusine (talk) 15:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lightning over Oradea Romania.JPG

Hi, I would like to ask you a favor. Could you please restore this file? I would like to see the original version of the picture and see if there is anything I can improve (I reedited an edited version of this deleted file and of what I understand the original might have helped me better). The deletion log says the reson was "missing file" but that seems unlikely to me as this pic has been nominated for FP status in the past. Diego_pmc ^Talk 21:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Xbox 360

It seems like I send you this message all the time, but can you replace old logo in the portal logo with the new one on the project page. Thanks, BW21.--Black Watch 21 02:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great. BW21.--Black Watch 21 22:54, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Veterans History Project

I'm a public affairs representative for the Library of Congress Veterans History Project. I recently posted basic information about this public domain/public participation program after observing that Wikipedia contains no reference to it. I note the reason for removal is "blatant advertising"; please advise how the page can be restored. Thanks and regards. Jsouva (talk) 16:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Jessica Souva[reply]

convert mp3

is it possible to put an mp3 format sound on wiki and have another user download it? if you need more info on this, talk to scalper. he's mah other friend besides you and toaster.MidKnightHunter (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have already responded to him, telling him this is not possible because it would violate various copyright laws, but you can too if you would like. Scapler (talk) 15:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring an Article

How can I make the article on Lakesha Woods acceptable for Wikipedia? Could you please elaborate in detail so that I may have your feedback for future reference on other articles that I may write and submit to Wikipedia. Also Lakesha Woods has been featured in mainstream media and press i.e, Newspapers and television as well as radio, and a host of internet media outlets as well. Do I need to included some of those references to prove her notability?

Thank you, Writerorjournalist2 (talk) 15:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Userpage

Thingg, your opinion is appreciated

Hello Thingg, and first of all, thank you for your time. I am seeking input regarding my userpage. My userpage, and the header for the rest of my pages, reflects my personality, that is to say they are incredibly quirky. While this appeals to me, I would greatly appreciate the opinions of other editors I have interacted with on the site. So, as an editor I have come to respect, I kindly beseech you to place any comments, ideas, or opinions you may have on the subject of my userpage or page navigation header bar on the corresponding talk page. Thank you friend, and cheers! Scapler (talk) 17:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section

I am questioning your speedy deletion of my article, MorningStar Education, under the CIO terms. There are numerous similar articles on Wikipedia concerning private entities and businesses: Morninstar Communications, Score Learning Centers, etc., etc, that are neutral in tone and have links to the corporate websites. Why are these articles not considered advertisements, but mine is?

```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marc morgenstern (talk • contribs) 00:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted FAR

Thingg, can you give me some background on Wikipedia:Featured article review/Crab Nebula? It's still listed at WP:FAR (and at the article talk page), as a redlink, so this is a strange situation, and whomever asked for it to be deleted left the job half done. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, it would probably be better to restore it so that I can move it to a "withdrawn" archive, if that was what occurred. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help (and the kind words), Thingg (these half-baked withdrawals and noms always take me about half an hour to deal with :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mo-Do

Hello Thingg,

I noticed you recently deleted the article on Mo-Do per CSD A7. I don't think the criterion is met, however, since the article stated that one of his single topped the charts in several countries. Could you please undelete it? Thanks, Korg (talk) 00:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and thanks for the restoration. Could you please also restore the article's talk page? Korg (talk) 17:38, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the vandalism reverion on my talk page. Much appreciated! :) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Good job at reverting vandalism. Keep it up :D Master&Expert (Talk) 01:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) Master&Expert (Talk) 01:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I was about to correct my mistaken revert but I see you got to it. Thanks!¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 02:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Hello, I see that you are the one that keeps changing my comments about The Hunger. Let me just say that I am only stating the truth. I just don't understand why you have to keep deleting my comments. They are not vulgar, obstructive, or in any way false. They are just simple observations that I believe will help anyone who plans on watching The Hunger enjoy it more. I would very much like to know why you keep deleting my comments. Tuvalu11 (talk) 03:18, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for the revert. Dloh cierekim 03:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dayton Article

Hi --

I was wondering why you undid my changes to the dayton, ohio page -- concerning chocolate covered potato chips. I have att'd 2 reference articles.

As to their importance in dayton culture -- they fill the local stores during the holiday seasons. I am a born-and-raised daytonian and they are consumed much more than, say, egg nog. Way more relevant than the pizza companies listed in the article.

dana (Danamv (talk) 03:41, 10 December 2008 (UTC)danamv)[reply]

Esther Price: http://www.estherprice.com/products.asp?dept=14

Wagner's: http://ohiomag.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=586CA122EB394032BD4AA3B686FF03D9&nm=Ohio+Magazine&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=0D549927D9364573812B50822D4B2BD4&tier=4&id=3BF0923BB472414595C29D4C3EDCBCCD

Natalie Zea

You should not have reverted my update on Natalie Zea, the information is accurate and verifiable. I provided two sources. 86.43.216.73 (talk) 04:14, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd weigh in on the vandalism tag you put on User talk:86.43.216.73. It doesn't look like the user was deliberately vandalizing the page -- rather, I think this user might be unfamiliar with policy. I know it's tempting to put vandal tags on edits like this, but sometimes a more personalized message can help prevent further damage to the article. No big deal. Graymornings_(talk) 04:26, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

for your viewing pleasure: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Natalie_Zea#allegations_about_her_cat 86.43.216.73 (talk) 04:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Power Rangers

Hello Thingg, I just wanted to drop by to remind you that the use of the undo button opposed to rollback would have probably been a better course of action to take here. As WP:ROLLBACK states: "The 'rollback' links provided by Wikipedia's interface provide a standard edit summary of the form "Reverted edits by X to last version by Y". These should be used only to revert edits that are clearly unproductive, such as vandalism; to revert content in your own user space; or to revert edits by banned users. Reversion for other reasons should be accompanied by an explanatory edit summary, and must therefore be done by a different method." - but you already knew that. Even though we often think of this as applying only to user with the Rollback userright, it does apply to administrators. Cheers! Tiptoety ^talk 04:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diuscussion

How can I discuss with you? You are reversing my contributions on no bases. [Jorge Ianis] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorge Ianis (talk • contribs) 04:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution on heliocentrism

Administrator Thingg: The sentence I added is to clarify, what the chapter on Middle East does nor say. My addition is polite and respectfull, if you want to keep the Wikipedia being useful it must not become a way of nationalistic, Islamic in this case, propaganda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorge Ianis (talk • contribs) 04:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the Barnstar! --McSly (talk) 04:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of Furtherfield article

hi thingg, some time ago you deleted the Furtherfield article; i'm not quite sure why, but in discussion with other people we have reworked the article and included more references (print and online) and links which we hope will satisfy you that it is indeed a worthy entry. you can see the rewritten page here: User:Frock/Furtherfield

i've been looking at the deletion review information & it says to try & resolve the issue with the admin who deleted it before submitting it for a review. so i'm asking you now to please have a look at the new article & if you think it's ok now then could you please advise me how i should go about reposting it - do i just recreate the page or is there some other procedure when an article has previously been deleted? (i have tried to look at the info provided but the processes seem very convoluted and confusing to a relative newbie like myself).

thanks for your time & consideration. Frock (talk) 21:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of info about The California Honeydrops

hi thingg, i am wondering why the page was deleted? the california honeydrops are a relevant band not alone in the context of african-american musical history. with their recent tours and release they have gained media interest based on their special focus on the origins of blues, soul, r&b. especially interesting is their choice of instruments which again is paying respect to the history of music. please let me know what i should change to be able to submit info about this band to wikipedia. thanks, willow Cahoney1 (talk) 22:12, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The New York Women's Agenda

Dear Ms. Thingg

You labeled my article as "blatant advertising." The New York Women's Agenda is an umbrella organization of women's groups who provide services to all types of women in the New York area. We are not for profit. We don't sell anything. We do not promote any political point of view. We merely provide a forum for women to get together.

Obviously I did not write it correctly. Can you suggest a way I could write it so it would pass muster?

Thank you. Psantry Psantry (talk) 18:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Furtherfield

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Furtherfield. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Frock (talk) 04:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time of year

·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Burr

Hi - I noticed you deleted the article on Craig Burr several weeks ago. I was not involved with the original authoring or editing of the page but have been working on related articles and wanted to see if you could restore the original text in my user space for improvement as he is the founder of two notable venture capital firms over the last four decades. Thanks |► ϋrbanяenewaℓ • TALK ◄| 22:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks |► ϋrbanяenewaℓ • TALK ◄| 16:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Charles Wildbank wiki page deletion

Thingg,

I was sorry to find my work deleted. At first when I viewed my Austrian art associate Gottfried Helnwein's wiki (he is my contemporary and I know him personally), it was how I got the idea to do one for Charles Wildbank. I know his personal staff created his page.

Do you recommend that I just build mine up on user:wildbank page and then have some professional use it as reference to create my art page like Gottfried Helnwein's? Could you also tell me why his is not deleted? It would help me understand.

Thank you, 24.45.18.243 (talk) 02:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Charles Wildbank[reply]

24.45.18.243 (talk) 02:48, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Charles Wildbank —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildbank (talk • contribs) 16:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

revised page

Hi- I totallty revised my page (Harbec Plastics)and am hoping it can be reconsidered.

--Kateetak (talk) 17:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)kateetak[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kateetak (talk • contribs) 17:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section

Hello, sorry about my so called vandalisum i was only trying to get rid of the summary of the story because it ruined the book for me,my class we where excited to read this and one of the students looked it up on this page may you please fix my edit? ( if you could that would be Very Nice)

ps No offence i just want the summarys taken out and or edited

            -Determined person Mr.Herold  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadsorrow (talk • contribs) 03:47, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation 2 & number of bits

I noticed you reverted my edit on PlayStation 2. I may have missed something along the way (and that's fine) and just wanted to make sure I understand completely. The CPU in the PS2 is a 64 bit PS2 (that has, what I've seen, generally been accepted in the article, and what it currently says). However, the console itself is part of the 128 bit generation? IOW, the generation and the CPU are different in terms of "number of bits." Just wanted to make sure I understood what you are saying with the edit summary. Thank you. --TreyGeek (talk) 04:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm with you on the confusion of how to classify the PS2. I'll admit I haven't done extensive research on where it really fits. (I've got other projects higher on my priority list.) I just scanned through the contents of the PS2 talk page and didn't see any discussion on the topic (only on the CPU). I'm going to leave it alone for now (low on my priority list). Perhaps one day I'll find time to research it and figure out what is best. Thanks for the reply. --TreyGeek (talk) 05:42, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mistress Fortune

Is there a reason my edits were reverted for Mistress Fortune? I had added in ISBN numbers and chapter titles, and referenced where they came from, so I'm not sure why it was undone... I had also added a link to the Vomic, which is an official Shueisha link... Kelakagandy (talk) 04:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for restoring the page. Kelakagandy (talk) 04:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep that in mind from now on. Thanks. :D Kelakagandy (talk) 05:44, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted me

All my info was true and revelant why did you delete me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwitzel (talk • contribs) 05:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section

Hey. This is Cferra from the TGWTG wiki. Why did you remove the link to it? Here's a link to the place: http://thatguywiththeglasses.wikia.com/wiki/ThatGuyWithTheGlasses_Wiki —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.95.146 (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Murten

This lake in Switzerland is called Lake Morat on Swiss maps. Three quarters of its shores speak French. "Lac de Morat" is the official name in Switzerland. In English Language writers and journalist have always used the name Lake Morat and not at all the German one. Only the city has a bilingual appelation : Murten/Morat. The word Murten is not English and not at all convenient for the lake.

Heh

You can just take a break, ya know User:Juliancolton/Faces –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 20:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section

why did you delete my addition to the PETA page it is legit and i even cited the source —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.160.161.156 (talk) 21:13, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jamie Zaninovich deletion

Any chance you could also see to File:2301159.jpg from the same article. I can't seem to do anything about it due to the file name, but it's now an orphan and I'd guess the license is false. [ cycle~ ] (talk), 21:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I am very disappointed you have deleted page Joshua Hinge. Please revert changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorsha (talk • contribs) 21:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Depicitions

Hi. The depictions were added to the articles by a user with an agenda. No other depiction of any of the personalities other than Ali and Husayn have been made in history and none are anywhere to be found in books or on the Internet, other than those added. As such, it would be very inappropriate for Wikipedia to host hideous drawings of individuals whose visual representation has been avoided throughout history. Khkuhk (talk) 21:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperbaric medicine

Hi Thingg, I thought I'd just drop you a quick note to request that when you revert edits, as you did here, it would be helpful to other editors such as myself, if you gave a reason. The standard Huggle message "m (Reverted edits by 165.228.190.54 to last version by Mckeeman (HG))" is unsuitable for anything other than uncontroversial vandalism (especially as it is marked as minor!), and I'm sure you can see from the article history that the new IP editor was merely having problems working out how to add their content and cite it. Thanks --RexxS (talk) 22:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frances Clarke Sayers Biography

Hello,

I created the entry on Frances Clarke Sayers and I was wondering why you reverted my addtions and corrections that I made on Dec 16, 2008?

I would greatly appreciate if you could undo your reverts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ea4537 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a school project that I've been keeping an eye on. I'm going to revert your reversion, more info later. Katr67 (talk) 00:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your block

Of User:216.170.202.20 was apparently removed by User:71.252.157.221. I reverted this but i just wanted to inform you of what happened since i saw your name on the template. cheers--EmperorofBlackPeopleEverywhere (talk) 23:09, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canada Merit Scholarship Foundation

What was the issue with my last edits? I am new here and trying to improve. Switchintoglide (talk) 02:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

posting an article

i am trying to post an article about a company my uncle founded. can you help guide me on how to do so without it being considered advertisement? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SalibaCo (talk • contribs) 17:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please read my words

i wanna be a admin and i wanna help them being safe till they calm dowm and also will you plz remove the hand sign and put on smiley face for me!plz!i begging you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benzygs94 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

rdunn 10:37, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

page protection, user block for the VFR articles needed again

Another wikigod page-protected this article, but the user is back (under another IP). Can you help out?

Articles: Honda VFR400, Honda VFR750R, Honda VF and VFR, Honda VFR800
The new IP - with the same behavior as the old IP that you blocked.

Thanks, tedder (talk) 19:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour?

Are you sure you want to click this link? It contains alot. About Meh. Stopping bye, rarely, now and then. So hows life? And i regret leaving you, rather go back to having you adopt me. >_> 72.89.195.110 (talk) 01:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted my article fair enough but I'm really notable, honest

Article: Matthew Yee-King Ok - I read all the stuff about speedy deletions, nobodies and notability. I've made some edits to my article e.g. added link to discogs and re-wrote the first para to place my work better in a notable context (links to 4 other people I've played in bands with, all of whom have wikipedia pages). Any chance of an undelete now? Google me dude - ImTheMaN sorry just wanted to annoy you with some camelBackStyle cos you called me a nobody. ha ha ha ha Peace, Yeeking

Kristen Wiig

If you're going to reverse my edit, why not reverse the rest of the article? It contains the same types of comments as her other characters, i.e. what's unique about that character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.38.246 (talk) 01:42, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In recognition of being that time of the year...

Ecoleetage (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Amir Bagheri

Did the page for chess grandmaster Amir Bagheri (which you speedily deleted)[10] say anything significant? The guy is probably notable, but if the page had nothing useful to say then I might as well just create it from scratch :) Peter Ballard (talk) 00:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, sounds like you deleted a different person of the same name. Peter Ballard (talk) 00:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy decline

"userspace content that is not defamatory or libelous is, for the most part, not speediable"

Even if it's a blatant ad for his own company (Young Hollywood, which was deleted more than once)? User:Rjw2007 sounds an awful lot like R. J. Williams, whose Young Hollywood website seems to have been spammed onto wikipedia by WP:SPAs like Jmlaing, JennieC2005, and Fsgsydney. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 00:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem?

What is your problem with the Francesco Barbaro page. Teh source is a link that you can read for yourself-it is perfectly fine. stop messing with the page. go vandalize something else dude! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.26.30.239 (talk) 00:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man, what is your beef with this page. You are not following any rules. The source is good, it is there for you and everyone else to read, the info is coming from the link. Go open it and read it. Stop vandalizing this page!63.26.30.239 (talk) 00:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Abbott Family

How are my edits to The Abbott Family article unconstructive? I was taking out the false and non-encyclopedic information. The way it reads now it says Katherine Chancellor married Dina Mergeron and they are the parents of John "Jack" Abbott Jr. (which isn't the correct title of that characters page). There are further inaccuracies you've reverted it back to such as John Abbott having an affair with Diane and fathering his own grandson and others. I also changed the order so the family tree came first and took out the living arrangements at Abbott Manor because they aren't at all encyclopedic and are outdated. So what was it you found unconstructive?Rocksey (talk) 00:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the cleanup. :) Merry Christmas! (Or happy alternate seasonal holiday! Or just, you know, have a really great week! :D) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:51, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for putting my comment about Clarice the Reindeer's paternity in proper format. Merry Christmas.98.110.162.252 (talk) 02:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how do i read your responses to my questions? there are other errors on herreras page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.214.53 (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corey Schell deletion

The original editor of Corey Schell (it's an autobio) is not pleased with the deletion and responded in my page because I had left him an autobio notice. Then, after you speedy deleted the article as A7, I deleted the original redirect with improper casing as G8. The OP came to me thinking I had deleted the original article. Please read about his at User_talk:Alexf#Yes_I_know and reconsider restoring to his user space for him to rework, if you choose to do so. For the record, I agree with the A7 speedy but would have no issues in userfying it for him to rework. The COI issue bothers me more than the notability at this point but if he can assert enough notability, it may be OK. Thanks. -- Alexf^(talk) 03:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Bagheri

Hi. You shouldn't remove links that existed long before a speedy A7-deleted page was created. Amir Bagheri was correctly redlinked on FIDE World Chess Championship 1999 and FIDE World Chess Championship 2000. Probably this world chess championship contender will get a good (or at least acceptable) page at some point. Oops, it's already happened. 24.177.121.141 (talk) 07:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hey I was wondering if you could restore the Corey Schell I have been working really hard on it and I have over 4 hours of time into it and it was actually looking really good I just have a few questions I was asking on how to fix it ect. Thank you for your timeCjschll (talk) 14:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS

Thanks for moving that for me... Now how do I add notibility to it.. I having some issues with how to do my ref side of it... ughhhCjschll (talk) 14:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you by chance go look at my page and tell me whats wrong and how to fix my references.. Thats the only thing that I cant figure out. I even tried going to that help thing or whatever and it still didnt make senceCjschll (talk) 17:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also I was wondering how to put the picture up on the right hand side that you see on other searches.Cjschll (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I got them two references on there now that are from news articals. Thats a start isnt it?Cjschll (talk) 14:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so I got them three ref tags in there yet they are not working um I think I did it right I used the format you told me to yet it like directs be back to my wikipedia page. Not sure if I needed to add them to the bottom on the reference side. Could you go look at tell me whats up with it. ThanksCjschll (talk) 15:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so I have the references KINDA fixed, I have 3 up top and 4 down low but I cant seem to tie them together. Could you fix that by chance or tell me how??? They are all in order also from 1-3 and there is an extra one down low.. Cjschll (talk) 16:14, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so I worked on it and I think its fixed and ready to go.. Could you tell me if this would pass or not and if it wouldnt what I need to do yet.. Thanks... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjschll (talk • contribs) 19:47, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of 'Ceàrr

Hello Thingg. Most of the article 'Ceàrr was edited by me, so deletion was no good idea, as Ceàrr is only a copy of the text but not the history. Would you please delete Ceàrr and restore/move 'Ceàrr to Ceàrr ? Thanks. --Ilion2 (talk) 17:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 'Ceàrr should be deleted now. It was a typo, the author is informed, so it is IMHO totally useless. --Ilion2 (talk) 06:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As there was neither a reply to this nor a result I asked successfull for speedy deletion. --Ilion2 (talk) 17:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

I spend quite a bit of time in newpages and AfD. I've also noticed that the backlog becomes quite overwhelming for the admins. Can you look over my history and tell me if you think it's a waste of time for me to try an RfA? Thanks! --Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 21:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

M.H.^{ITrue Romace iS Dead} is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This card promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has has made your day a much better. Best Wishes and Happy Editing.

15:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Holidays!

MerryChristmas!

--Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 16:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMPORTANT QUESTION:

I have seen imdb cited on numerous pages in the reference section and they have been intact for quite some time---yet another user is telling me that imdb is not accurate and cannot be used as reference and reverted my changes----Can you please tell me the correct wiki guideline for this--thank you. movieman2008 Movieman2008 (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can IMDB be used as a reference?

I have seen imdb cited on numerous pages in the reference section and they have been intact for quite some time---yet another user is telling me that imdb is not accurate and cannot be used as reference and reverted my changes----Can you please tell me the correct wiki guideline for this--thank you. movieman2008 Movieman2008 (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barbaro hoaxer

Thanks for your help on dealing with the hoaxer. If you have questions about this ongoing problem, please see User:Barneca/watch/societyfinalclubs. Edward321 (talk) 00:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Barbaro hoaxer. How can editors who are adding validly sourced material that can be checked by anyone be hoaxing. That is rediculous. You also can not block a good faith editor, that is corruption and abuse of power- there is no basis for it?4.143.236.17 (talk) 01:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:MysteryViper

Is it possible you could protect this page as the indef blocked editor is copying your talk page and mine and replacing his page with it see here thanks. BigDunc^Talk 14:15, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help

I never heard back from you regarding the imdb question I posted several days ago. I really would like you help. I'm relatively new to wiki but my experience has not been very good the last few days. i feel I have alot to add to the community but based on interaction with a user I'm not sure I can be apart of it. I know you are an admin so I really would like your help--as I dont my question is now beyond imdb i dont think what has occurred here is fair. I don't care if you fix the situation but I think its important you are at least aware of it as it really is not fair. Please let me know how I can discuss this issue with you. Thanks for you time.(Movieman2008 (talk) 02:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Regarding your response to the above user, could you please let me know how I'm being "unreasonable"? What part of my "reaction" do you find objectionable? If I'm going about things the wrong way, I'd appreciate a heads up. I am trying not to be bite-y with him. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 02:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BARNSTAR!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar awarded to Thingg

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For lightning-quick reversion and expulsion of (my first) userpage vandalism that I didn't even know happened until it was done and reverted! Sallicio ^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 03:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment about amendments

Backgammon history

Can you please explain why you reverted my amendments to backgammon. I have not yet seen any response from you.

Tables is only sensibly phrased as similar to backgammon because there are so many more people who know of backgammon than they do of any other tables form. That is why I believe that it is stronger to say that Tables is a game of which Backgammon is the best-known example.

There is no 'proof' that Senet is a backgammon type so it is safer and actually better to say as I did 'there may be similarities'.

The same with the Burnt City reference - the board and pieces are clearly not actually backgammon-style so the proper statement is again 'there may be similarities'.

I would not have changed the wording without reason. I find a simple reversion to be unhelpful especially with no notation in the talk section of the reason. Can you tell me why the less precise wording is better.

I have noted that much the same sort of simplification occurs in other game articles as regards historic background. I find that H.J.R.Murray is usefully academic in much of his research as he avoids such statements as 'Senet is this or that' in favour of 'It is uncertain but Senet may .....'. Salisbury-99 (talk) 11:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I accept that you are very busy correcting other pages but I would appreciate a response as I believe my corrections are better for the less knowledgeable reader - JKing86.146.22.113 (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MGM Category Listing

I am wondering if you knew how to remove this item (listed as Blofeld_of_SPECTRE/American_film) from the list. It redirects to the user's personal userspace and not to the actual film. If you have no idea how to, could you please inform someone else in the matter. Thanks in advance and Cheers!!--EmperorofBlackPeopleEverywhere (talk) 22:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done The Bald One ^{White cat} 23:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Widen Enterprises, Inc.

That page needs to be deleted. -- IRP ☎ 23:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Removal of section of Republika Srpska

Dear Thingg,

I saw your comment that my editing of Article: Republika Srpska - Section: Criticism of the Republika Srpska right to exist was labeled as vandalism. I would like to kindly point out that whoever wrote that section has done nothing else but spread vicious propaganda, with mind you tons of spelling errors. As you may have noticed the section only references a single source related to ICJ in which ironically the ruling was exactly opposite of what the section insinuates. Second paragraph is particularly offensive reference free, and furthermore a map which was uploaded, has no bibliographic information indicating where it was pulled from. Perhaps just like the rest of the lies, it was self created by the author.

I have been a user of Wikipedia for a long time, and I have great respect for its services. However I had to edit/remove an offensive and even more importantly undocumented lie. Moderators and administrators exist to help and assist with vandalism so I thank you for doing your job, but I would really appreciate it if you give it a second look.

p.s. For now I'll mark the section as disputed.

My sincere regards, onyxig —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onyxig (talk • contribs) 23:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. Will do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onyxig (talk • contribs) 17:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

21st century reverting

Is there a reason for reverting my edit for the 21st century? I'm talking about adding authoritarism on the Issues and concerns section. It was sourced, even though most of the section isn't. It was sourced by The Guardian... I don't get it. Plus it's enough to take a look at all the demonstrations around the world to see that it is a real concern. Why not improve it, but simply delete it? Why does it classify as vandalism? I'm starting to have really big concerns about Wikipedia because of this.

P.S. After you reverted it so fast, I saw that the page was the same, and I thought that there was some error, so I just added the thing again, but then Shirulashem deleted it again, so it's not up there anymore. You have it your way, and if this is what Wikipedia is like, then I have better things to do. 89.123.4.134 (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

section

Hello Thingg,

I am having issues with putting "disputed" in the Republika Srpska article. In fact I posted my complaints for the article section on the talk page, but I keep getting warnings from I dont even know who: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Onyxig So a million dollar question, when one wants to label propaganda as disputed its called censorship and vandalism? Can you please help me straighten out this nonsense. All I wanted to do is mark it as disputed, and leave it for potential removal through consensus as you recommended.

my regards Onyxig (talk) 18:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Marcellusb

Hi Thingg, I see that you reverted this user for one season of a show I know nothing about...could you look at his contribs and see if his edits to the other seasons of the same show are legit?
Cheers,⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 02:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the several promo items on the exchanges' pages and for warning that user. (I reverted one of two myself before you beat me to the rest.) --RayBirks (talk) 02:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations on beating me to the ultimate revert by seconds on Alexandra Burke. It must be nice having Huggle! Glad to see you again as a sysop Thingg. I knew you'd make it one day! Happy new year :-) John Sloan (view / chat) 02:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking about installing Huggle for a while now. But to be honest, i'm a little affaid of how powerful it actually is :D - As you saw, I sometimes get my reverts wrong! I'll probably give it a go sometime in 2009, when I feel a bit more confident as a wikipedian. Hope to see you around the 'pedia again sometime soon! For now, happy editing! :-) John Sloan (view / chat) 02:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanksgiving and request

Thanks for the reverting of 99.135.162.128's edits to my talk page. By the way, I don't want to sound like a grass or something, but 99.135.162.128 has been reverting the ZP Theart article several times. ZP is the vocalist for the band DragonForce but he has achieved no notability alone, which means he's not notable enough to have his own article at Wiki, and that's why his page is a redirect. 99.135.162.128 has been warned several times for his revertings, but he always blanks his talk page, and I believe that's the reason he hasn't been blocked yet. Couldn't you block him to stop this revert war? Other suggestions are welcome, as well. Thank you, Victor Lopes (talk) 02:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the problem is that the final warning has already been placed in his talk page for three times, I think..but no problem, I'll go for WP:AIV next time 99.135.162.128 appears. Yeah, to be an admin seems quite a hard job...I don't know if I would deal patiently and kindly with vandals, new users and "why did you delete my page?" guys =P Thank you, Victor Lopes (talk) 02:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I can handle it. I'm always happy to do something new at Wikipedia, anyway. And since he tried to warn me as a vandal twice, things have got a little...personal. Oh, and your short message in his talk page sounded really threatening. I mean, I like it when people go straight to the subject, skipping things like "hello..." Victor Lopes (talk) 02:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dewd

Why did you erase Invictus Venatus? Me and my friend were going to work on it and its very hard to work on it when its the second time that you've deleted it. We will give it purpose, but we need time to work on it we just started today.

~Lord Suibuku —Preceding unsigned comment added by Suibuku (talk • contribs) 02:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Disputed

Click to expand »

Thanks for taking the time to look at it.

> I think his problem is that you aren't being entirely clear on what you think is inaccurate. All you've basically done is say that it is propaganda and you haven't given a good reason to remove it. The sentence you complained about on the talk page is, from what I see, merely repeating what a judge ruled. And the rest of the section is simply reporting that some people don't think the republic should exist and tells why they don't think it should (and the article doesn't give undue weight to this view, it just mentions it briefly).

I apologize for not being too clear, so I will write a point form bellow of whats wrong with it:

- Image uploaded -> No citation of where it is obtained, and where the facts are for construction of it. - ...because of their opinion that the initial creation of a separate entity for the Serbs of Bosnia was based on harsh ethnic cleansing policies and genocide -> I am familiar with these accusations, from the second war party, just like I'm familiar with the accusations pointing in other directions. However I dont see that the reference says that anywhere. - Many politicians in the Bosniak-Croat Federation criticize the existence of Republika Srpska because of their opinion that the initial creation of a separate entity for the Serbs of Bosnia was based on harsh ethnic cleansing policies and genocide -> This sentence is indeed a part of the SF article, and I have failed to see it. It is written by another opinionist with no references to back it up, soemthing similar to good old BBC/CNN type of coverage and objectiveness.

> Again, I don't really care whether the section is in the article or not, but I fail to see any good reason to remove it. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

- With these clarifications hopefully something will change. However the point is that this 2-3 sentence section is not doing anything constructive to that small country/entity, and its interesting that although wars have existed for 1000s of years, I dont see any "criticism" sections on any other country in wikipedia (that I have so far visited), and yet there's plenty to be said...

Thanks for the help, and I hope soemthing changes, but whatever the last step is, I won't bother anymore.

Onyxig (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Disputed - Formatted - sorry for last post

Thanks for taking the time to look at it.

> I think his problem is that you aren't being entirely clear on what you think is inaccurate. All you've basically done is say that it is propaganda and you haven't given a good reason to remove it. The sentence you complained about on the talk page is, from what I see, merely repeating what a judge ruled. And the rest of the section is simply reporting that some people don't think the republic should exist and tells why they don't think it should (and the article doesn't give undue weight to this view, it just mentions it briefly).

I apologize for not being too clear, so I will write a point form bellow of whats wrong with it:

- Image uploaded -> No citation of where it is obtained, and where the facts are for construction of it.
- ...because of their opinion that the initial creation of a separate entity for the Serbs of Bosnia was based on harsh ethnic cleansing policies and genocide -> I am familiar with these accusations, from the second war party, just like I'm familiar with the accusations pointing in other directions. However I dont see that the reference says that anywhere.
- Despite the evidence of widespread killings, rape and torture elsewhere during the Bosnian war, especially in detention centers, the judges ruled that the criteria for genocide were met only in Srebrenica. -> This sentence is indeed a part of the SF article, and I have failed to see it. It is written by another opinionist with no references to back it up, something similar to good old BBC/CNN type of coverage and objectiveness.

> Again, I don't really care whether the section is in the article or not, but I fail to see any good reason to remove it. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

- With these clarifications hopefully something will change. However the point is that this 2-3 sentence section is not doing anything constructive to that small country/entity, and its interesting that although wars have existed for 1000s of years, I dont see any "criticism" sections on any other country in wikipedia (that I have so far visited), and yet there's plenty to be said...

Thanks for the help, and I hope soemthing changes, but whatever the last step is, I won't bother anymore

Onyxig (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent deletion

Please be sure to check the history carefully before deleting a page, even if the author blanks it. You deleted Jeremy Wolf, and said "Speedy deleted, blanked or requested by creator" for the deletion reason. Actually, you should have deleted it and said "G10: Attack page" for the deletion reason. -- IRP ☎ 17:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The stated deletion reason was completely appropriate. Tan | 39 17:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Polanski Rape

Please view the talk page for Roman Polanski before making edits to the page.

Wikipedia pages are not designed to chart every single event or occupation a person has ever had. They are however supposed to chronicle those things for wish a person is most known . Roman Polanski is well known for being a rapist. There is even a movie about this. There are many other famous people who are also very well know not just for there careers but also for events in their personal lives. One is OJ Simpson. He is very well known for his crimes and this is listed in the very first sentence of his page as well. Would you change that? Will this be changed 30 years from now when people have decided to forget about how much they talk about it now? Polanski is no deferent in that his crime is something he is well known for having done. This is an important and pivitol aspect of his character that still has an influence on his life and the lives of others. I am sure that at some point in his life he held a job other than those listed in the first sentence of his page, or even anywhere on his page, but those things are not as important or relevant to him and how he is known. Being a rapist however, is very relevant to how he is known, and as such should be included in those things for which he is most recognized. I suggest that if you feel this moment is not relevant to the fact that he does not return to the states, was also relevant to the fact that he did not even accept his academy award, and that if he does return to the states he will be arrested then perhaps you do not understand the impact that such an event has on a life. Rape is an event that never leaves a person. They will live with that event for the rest of their lives. It becomes an integral part of who they are and everything they do, regardless of being the rapist or the person being raped. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.108.47 (talk) 19:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greeting

Wish You a very happy new year.Thanks for your feedback which I appreciate.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy 2009

Happy New Year from SchfiftyThree! Have a great day, Thingg/archive 6! SchfiftyThree ^(talk!) 21:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]