User talk:Wisehearted

Speedy deletion of Gaucho theory

A tag has been placed on Gaucho theory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Seegoon (talk) 23:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gaucho theory

A tag has been placed on Gaucho theory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jon Ace ^T ^C 00:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Deletion: Gaucho Theory

I've nominated your article Gaucho Theory for deletion. Sorry - I'm a redditor too, but it doesn't fit WP:N. The nom is here. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 03:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Guacho theory

This is the only reason that article existed at all. Wikipedia does not allow articles on non-notable internet memes. (ie. anything less well-known than rickrolling) Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 03:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I read the talk page and all I saw was a bunch of chatter from some guys on that reddit forum. Having a page about a new meme is not, imo. a good idea as it clearly and indisputably fails every notability guideline in the book. If it becomes notable in the future, that is fine and we can make an article about it, but as of now we have no way of knowing what will happen to it. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 03:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah it was kind of a trigger-fingered delete on my part, which is part of the reason I restored it. (another more experienced admin recommended I let the AfD run it's course; I've only been an admin for like 5 weeks) Also, I didn't realize the 'hangon' had just been added because my script that displays a clock on the top right of Wikipedia articles uses my computer's time, not wikipedia's time, and my clock was about 2 minutes faster than WPs. Also, it is standard procedure to delete the talk page of articles when deleting the main article. (otherwise we'd have literally hundreds of thousands of mostly useless talk pages floating around; see this page to get an idea of how many pages are being deleted right now) So now the article is back and the AfD will run it's course. Sorry about the trouble. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 04:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]