User talk:Kazens
Speedy deletion of Angel Sword
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Angel Sword, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LGF1992UK (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
Looks like I missed the deadline to contest the speedy deletion. However:
- I used Hanwei_(sword_producer) as a template to create this article.
- I understand that just because this article has not been deleted does not mean that it's good, but I thought it at least an indicator.
- I am in no way affiliated with Angel Sword, but noticed several other swordsmiths listed on Wikipedia, while doing research to purchase a sword.
- Help me to do better next time by giving me a little more detail about how to write an article about a company without getting flagged as spam.
- I saw this as more along the "simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion." qualifier to Wikipedia:CSD#G11