User talk:Wmroradio

November 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WMRO (AM), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. In addition, your user name indicates a conflict of interest in editing this article. Please do not delete sections of text and formatting without cause or explanation. Dravecky (talk) 18:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to WMRO (AM). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg ^⊕^⊗ 18:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to WMRO (AM). J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. GraemeL ^(talk) 18:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Pending retraction of the legal threat you left here: [1] I have blocked this account. If you wish to make a full retraction of that threat, this account may be unblocked. Please use the {{unblock}} template below to print your retraction. Note to other admins. If this user makes a full retraction, please feel free to unblock without contacting me. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP editing

Based on this user's editing pattern and claims of ownership to the radio station in question, I strong suspect that this person previously edited anonymously from 68.52.66.53. All of the edits from that IP address, like all of those from this user, were to delete sections of the WMRO (AM) article without apparent cause or explanation. - Dravecky (talk) 19:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which does beg the question, are we sure our information is right? Wmroradio still can edit this page, it would be most helpful if he or she could identify the problem with the section that s/he keeps removing, or better still, pointing to a source that contradicts it. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 20:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is pretty scrupulously referenced. The references do support the information in the article, and as far as I can tell neither this account nor the IP addresses before it who he obviously used, have even once raised any specific objections to the information; rather it seems he's just interested in blanking the whole article. If, in fact, he is the person he claimes to be, then this appears more of a "I own the station so I should control all of the information about it" case rather than any one specific sentance that may be inaccurate... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 20:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]