User talk:Teflon Peter Christ/Archive 2012

Archives

2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022

Concerning Nostalgia, Ultra

I had some free time and I wanted to work on the Nostalgia, Ultra article, perhaps to promote it go GA status. Mostly out of boredom and because I really love Frank's music. But I can't really do anything with the article because of all the Nostalgia, Lite information.

I propose that since the EP has been indefinitely delayed, the article should be only about the original mixtape, and it should mention the planned EP in the article itself. I don't know though... you're the main contributor on the article. Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:10, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth to you, the article is now a GA, and you have a majority of the credit for that. Bruce Campbell (talk) 00:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of What Were You Hoping For?

The article What Were You Hoping For? you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:What Were You Hoping For? for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? ♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 16:29, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Music Barnstar
		For you work on music articles, I hereby award you this barnstar! :)♫GoP♫_T ^C _N 16:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Dan56 for helping to promote What Were You Hoping For? to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 01:29, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your pages are back

Hello Dan56, your pages are moved back. If you don't want this to happen again, please file a indefinite move-protection request to WP:RFPP. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 05:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Endtroducing DJshadow.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Endtroducing DJshadow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coltrane, Adderley, Davis and Evans.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coltrane, Adderley, Davis and Evans.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:00, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Goodies (album). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please note that the edit you are reverting is not WP:Vandalism. Toddst1 (talk) 20:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days (multiple instances of edit warring ) for edit warring, as you did at Goodies (album). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 23:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teflon Peter Christ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block seems unwarranted. I made a talk page post for the IP user (who was not blocked) to make his case for his controversial change, which he was aware of and did not, continuing to make the controversial change. I even asked several other editors to comment there, getting one response. Then, after Toddst1 warns both of us of our edit war, I try to explain this to him. Afterwards, some genre warrior makes an unexplained genre change (as were all of this user's edits to other articles) to the Goodies article. So I ask Toddst1 whether I can revert this vandalism (his talk page), but he doesnt give me a clear answer. I would have backed off he said no, even though this was a different user I was reverting, and it didnt seem to be within a 24 hour period. But three days? Seriously? The IP didnt even get blocked. Hell, I was the one who reported him to WP:AVI to begin with. BUT, I do realize that the overriding of the IPs edits, back and forth, the past week was warring, and the block would have been justified. But I was not blocked after that, but after reverting the genre change. So I would not have been blocked had I left it alone? Dan56 (talk) 06:15, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were edit warring on the article, over a period of about three weeks. Wikipedia's policy on edit warring is, essentially "don't edit war", not "don't edit war unless you are right". Toddst1 gave a perfectly clear answer, which is that he/she can't give you permission to continue the edit war. I don't understand why you think that is unclear, nor why you seem to imagine that an editor can give permission to another editor to continue edit warring. I can only echo the following comment that Toddst1 made: "It sounds like you don't know what an edit war is", which, considering your past history, is astonishing. Considering your past history of numerous blocks for edit warring over a period of just under four years, I find a three day block surprisingly minimal, and I certainly see no case at all for reducing it. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For your information, a few words about two things you mentioned in your unblock request, but which were irrelevant to that request. Whether the IP editor should have been blocked has no bearing on your block: have you ever read WP:NOTTHEM? I see no reason to see your last edit to the article ("reverting the genre change") as relevant one way or the other, but if you are interested in knowing whether that influenced the decision then you will have to ask the blocking admin after the block has expired. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I read the lead of WP:Edit war, and it says it's when editors dispute over content. My reverting of the genre warrior's change is seperate from the content with the other editor, where I opened a forum for consensus at the article's talk page and he refused to follow. WP:Edit war also says "There are certain exemptions to 3RR, such as reverting vandalism", and I thought one of numerous genre warrior edits are vandalism. Had the dude that blocked me not been so stiff and just replied "yes" or "no", I would not have made the last revert, and I would not have been blocked. I tried to take it to the talk page, and it wasnt that blatant reverting the IP. He would show up like once every four or five days, before it turned into warring and I tried to take it to the talk page. Dan56 (talk) 21:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And was is it with this attitude that I have a serious history with edit warring. It comes up like once a year when some amatuer make some dubious edits or vandalism, and I admittingly go a little overboard, but I've done ridiculously far more good than bad. I reported the IP after he was unwilling to even look at the talk page/consensus idea, and I'm the one that's blocked for reverting an unconstructive edit seperate from the content in the edit war, made by a different editor. When I said it wasnt clear what Tod said, I meant about his response "I can't give you permission." I thought he was either telling me I shouldnt or it wasnt up to him, like he isnt someone with that kind of authority. Doesnt any of this seem reasonable? Dan56 (talk) 21:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

Hi Dan, You are correct the article was written by me. But no one has said anything in it is incorrect and those sites are copyright compliant. In any case another editor has added a lyric link Bstark247 —Preceding undated comment added 23:48, 7 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Dan56 for helping to promote Wasting Light to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 09:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KopJ/BrokenWall3

Thanks for opening the sockpuppet case, and the report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. I have blocked the sockpuppet account. If the same user comes back under yet another name, feel welcome to let me know on my talk page if you like. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is so weird about: "The Marshall Mathers LP received highly positive reviews from critics?

It did... I mean, if an album has a Metascore of 79/100, and needs 81/100 to be "acclaimed, isn't that near-critical acclaim or highly positive reviews...wow, seriously? --Khanassassin 13:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doo-wops and holigans

Please dont make doo-wops and holigans platinum times 4 in new zealand It is platinum times 5 now if you dont beleve me go to this website http://nztop40.co.nz/chart/albums Thanks BrunoMars123456789 (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Comment on my proposed changes?

Wasn't me... just a user that recognizes the effort people do for GAs. (though in Wasting Light's case, he must have only looked at the editcount, as you have 96 edits but I'm the one who expanded, nominated, and did the GA requests) Did a short comment on 21, as I also can't understand as well why that editor disregards your additions - it's not bloating, misleading or anything. May the Force be with you, hope that one will be solved. (and if you're available, I'd also like to hear what you could comment on an article I'm working on) igordebraga ≠ 19:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sincere apologies

Hey, I acted unnecessarily harsh towards you. I'm really, really sorry. It was uncalled for. I love your changes to the article.... (just not the intro, please! I'll source the vintage authenticity soon.) But I love your changes, and I hope you can forgive me. Orane (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: February 2012

Yeah, fuck you too prick! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.236.236 (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Singles on Article Relapse

You say that it is not within the guidelines to include singles from a Refill on the Relapse page. Could you link me to where these guidelines are, I can't find them.Green-Halcyon (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Kids

Hey, I declined the speedy on this article because it doesn't meet speedy deletion criteria. Feel free to nominate the article via WP:PROD or at WP:AfD if you want, though, maybe some people with speak with their penis and excrete out of their mouth. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback (Ks0stm)

Hello, Teflon Peter Christ. You have new messages at Ks0stm's talk page.
Message added 05:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Ball (box set)

If you wanted to reverse the pagemove, no need for prod. Speedy deletion criterion G6 gets the job done faster. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adele 21

It's actually me (Journalist). Please revert yourself and reinstate my addition to the article. The info "(arranged by famed British musician Rosie Danvers)" is contained in both inline citations to the sentence (it's incorrectly written as "Rosy" in the M magazine article). And next time, it's ok to check sources before you blindly revert me and issue warnings. Orane (talk) 03:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Prescription Medication

It mentions in the NME link that he was dependent on Valium and Vicodin as well as Ambien, the first two not necessarily being sleeping pills, but still prescription medication — Preceding unsigned comment added by Green-Halcyon (talk • contribs) 09:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Shakira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Hip Hop Award
		I, IrishLad1916 (talk), award the Hip Hop Award to Dan56 for the amount of work you put into articles concerning Eminem, and want to let you know I appreciate it. Here this Barnstar is for you! IrishLad1916 (talk) 21:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hi

i just wonder why you delete my add about bruno mars article

i give you how much his album sold with a real score ::: http://www.musicharts.net/index.php?cat=yechart&year=2011&chid=0}} so why you delete it ???????????????

please answer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sola2012 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since 5.7 million copies worldwide is almost 6 million copies, there are no lies in what I wrote on the Speak Now page. Stop deleting my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlieeG (talk • contribs) 20:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan56. Please do not bite new users who are only trying to help. An edit summary saying "doh!, Bad, bad, bad, duhhhhhhh" is not very helpful. Please explain the reason for reverting.--Charles (talk) 13:39, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Hey Dan, how's it going? I noticed several other users have commented in regards to that image situation, and that the issue seems to have died down. I'll definately keep an eye out on it though, and if it brews back up, I'll try to help by contacting the user, and/or engaging in the discussion on the album talk page. --Blastmaster11 (talk) 18:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. When you recently edited The Blueprint 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memory Lane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

You left a vandalism template on a very new editor's page for this edit of theirs. It may or may not be correct, but it's clearly not vandalism. This could be a productive new editor; please try and help him/her adjust to our ways here, rather than slapping on more unhelpful templates. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 22:31, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My edit in Speak Now's Wikipedia page is NOT false. The album has sold over 5.5 million copies worldwide and that was made official months ago. It's not vandalism, those are facts. I have included like 3 references backing that up, so stop deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.127.250.78 (talk) 03:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MDNA

Well, after second thought, I think you were right. There will be many more notable reviews, and most Madonna's album articles used only major publications, like Hard Candy. Bluesatellite (talk) 03:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It looks much better now :) Bluesatellite (talk) 04:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your amazing effort on the critical reception of MDNA. Keep up good work. Bluesatellite (talk) 03:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Born_This_Way#Born_This_Way_sales

Could you be kind enough to voice your point-of-view on this? It is appreciated. I'd like to start a discussion instead of engaging in edit-warring and WP:POINT. Thanks. —WP:PENGUIN · ^{[ TALK ]} 22:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Ray Ray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:G.O.O.D. Morning, G.O.O.D. Night.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:G.O.O.D. Morning, G.O.O.D. Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for the info regarding the Wikipedia style manual. I was using the AP Stylebook regarding punctuation and quotations. I stand corrected and will follow your advice. TopDog5450 (talk) 21:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Take Care, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Condé Nast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doo Wops

Could you change the certification table on One Direction Up All Night (One Direction album)#Certifications to the table on DOO WOPS because now the reader doesn't know whether its based on sales or shipments AdabowtheSecond (talk) 15:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kanye

Yea I prefer that one you added. Would you object to it being cropped though? Hot Stop 05:52, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See File:Kanye West SWU Music & Arts Festival 2011 (crop).jpg Hot Stop 06:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I added it. Hot Stop 06:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stone Rollin.jpg

Hello, what do you mean with "extra colors" with my version of File:Stone Rollin.jpg? Klow (talk) 12:24, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So by "extra" you mean added by someone to the original? Your version is just paler than the original cover to me, that's all. Klow (talk) 20:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, neither your version nor mine match the one found at Saadiq's official website, so what?... Klow (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I may still have some at the store I work at. I'll trust you for now, but I'll compare when I can! ;) Klow (talk)

Otis Blue: Otis Redding Sings Soul

Hello! I'll be reviewing Otis Blue: Otis Redding Sings Soul during the next 7 days. As you are a notable contributor to the article, i'd like you to be in touch with what nedds to be donde on the article and stay during the review process.

Thanks --Hahc21 (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Black Sales

I have no idea how to post links but I'm telling you they do say at the Mobo's that it sold over 17 million albums. Unfortunatly I can't post link to it but I was hoping you could as you know how to post links clearly. Just type in Amy winehouse mobo awards tribute. They are talking about back to black as Frank did not sell 7 million albums worldwide which it would have to in order for B2B to have only sold over ten thanks.--Mossty (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

yeah okay no need to get offensive I wasn't asking you to go fishing for links for me. I wasn't sure how to post links and you were putting information that is incorrect and were pretty adamant about putting that incorrect information on the page, so I thought if you were so adamant about putting this information that is so incorrect you might want to put the correct information on the article. my mistake.--Mossty (talk) 22:45, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes mine's an award ceremony, mine's bigger--Mossty (talk) 22:49, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChmFWuRIjRI&feature=player_detailpage — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mossty (talk • contribs) 22:59, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean I can't be serious that was what they said at a major awards ceremony. Who are we to say its all bollocks --Mossty (talk) 23:05, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its actually something that was said at a major awards ceremony. I very much doubt that the presenter just said it off the bat it would have been whoever wrote that speech. Second the forbes magazine could just be making an estimate that it sold over 10 million albums worldwide, its been said in a number of magazine's since 2008 that back to Black had sold over ten million albums worldwide I will look and provide you with another source to that. So that clearly proves that Forbes magazine is wrong as it was published in 2011. Are you seriously telling me that Back to Black would not have sold at least one million in the four years since all over the world especially in the fuss around her death. Third even if they were beefing Amy up it would be quite a big deal to go from over ten million to seventeen million (pretty random number to pick out of the air) plus it is known that Frank did not sell even close to over 7 million albums worldwide which it would have too in order for Back to Black to have only sold over ten million albums worldwide. Face facts Back to Black has clearly sold more than 10 million and this tribute which clearly a lot of thought was put into (they got Dionne to sing picked one of Amy's lesser known songs) gives us a rough estimate of what it is.--Mossty (talk) 23:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not conjecture the facts back it up also if there is something that contradicts what has been written on this page like that source does surely you can't ignore it. It was said at one of the most respected prestigious awards ceremonies it can't just be dismissed as something a rabid Amy Winehouse fan said on the streets. Just because you trust forbes more how is that not conjecture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mossty (talk • contribs) 23:52, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello. You have a new message at GoingBatty's talk page. GoingBatty (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Hi Dan56! Do you have a more reliable source than KRS-ONE? Please listen to "Honest Expression" by Binary Star, they explain it clearly at the end of the song. Arcandam (talk) 20:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you've reverted perfectly good edits by other people as well. Why? Arcandam (talk) 20:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PFRR

Dan I thought we went over this... The albums second half is Eurodance and is cited my an unlimited amount of sources. But since you were so adement about not including it we decided on electronic dance. So why do you keep switching it back to just "dance"?--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 22:39, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because if half the album is Eurodance, it should be included in the infobox, I'm not here for misleading people... Simply changing the genre to dance does not reflect the true genre of the album--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 22:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thats WP:NOR and thats not allowed, you can say what you want, but the sources disagree--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 01:03, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Go back to our discussion on the article page, I provided plenty of sources for you, but you said that it wasnt fair, than you did the exact same thing with the "pop" genre.--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 01:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, I just remembered that I had sourced them into the infobox, so you should be able to find it in the "view history" section. I'm going to start to expand the article and make the composition section, and I just don't want it to be weird when half of the songs say "eurodance", "europop", "eurodisco" in the composition section, and then they see "hip hop, pop, dance" in the info box. Thats why I wanted to add in electronic dance, since all those fall under that, it would give a bit more a fair representation, know what I mean?--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 01:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then you musnt of checked the right ones... Since you know on wikipedia, if it is sourced that an album is 50% of a genre, it can be added in. Look at the sources and youll see "shifts into the eurodance half" "then for the second half Minaj relies on Gaga esque Europop"--(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: GAN

Sure. I can look at it in a day or two. Though I am curious about why you asked me to review the article. GamerPro64 01:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA notice

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Loud (Rihanna album) in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. --(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 10:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
· · ·

Sure. Thanks for reviewing it again. ;) — Tomica (talk) 19:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Teflon Peter Christ. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 16:31, 21 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RE:Speakerboxxx article

Which ever I figured cause of WP:SLASH it should be moved. Swifty*^talk 00:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! I was agreeing with you. Swifty*^talk 00:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way could you give your opinion on this? Swifty*^talk 00:57, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrate (Jordin Sparks & Whitney Houston song)

Hi there, would you please help reach consensus by weighing in your opinion here. Thanks! Oz ^talk 21:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sons of Soul

Hi there! I have reviewed Sons of Soul which you nominated for GA. I could only find a few things that could be improved. Overall, a great article. You should be proud of it! Cheers, Basilisk4u (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of LiveLoveA$AP

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. For comments, please click here. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have now been addressed, so I passed the article. Continue to keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 17:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mixtapes/Compilations

I'm actually well aware that mixtapes aren't really compilations. Especially these days with up and coming rappers and R&B singers' careers in limbo, they release mixtapes to stay relavant. However, in Template:Infobox album, the green color, (which is used for compilation albums) is also used for mixtapes in default, with greatest hits albums, box set albums and remix albums as well. Generally all of them categorized as compilations: "Category:(Year) compilation albums". These days, the main album category (Category:(Year) albums) is only used for studio albums now. Perhaps a discussion should be started about this Mixtapes/Compilations issue, what do you think? QuasyBoy (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Koavf (talk · contribs) is the best person to talk to about that. He is the one that creates most of those sub categories anyway. QuasyBoy (talk) 16:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hey, could you work on the critical reception section for the Fortune article please? :) Oz ^talk 11:24, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Oz ^talk 21:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Veasey2 Pink Friday Roman Reloaded

The chartnews is just as reliable as SOHH! Sooo whatever and secondly I verified it through BILLBOARD! LINK: http://www.billboard.com/news/adele-gotye-lead-mid-year-soundscan-charts-1007491562.story?utm_source=most_recent#/news/adele-gotye-lead-mid-year-soundscan-charts-1007491562.story?page=2 . So you can STOP changing the information I put! What are you lurking on the PF:RR page to make sure her sales stay low!? Thanks for nothing #PEACE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veasey2 (talk • contribs) 04:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrate (Jordin Sparks & Whitney Houston song)

Hi there, would you please help reach consensus by weighing in your opinion here. Thanks! Oz ^talk 21:03, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sons of Soul

Hi there! I have reviewed Sons of Soul which you nominated for GA. I could only find a few things that could be improved. Overall, a great article. You should be proud of it! Cheers, Basilisk4u (talk) 20:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of LiveLoveA$AP

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. For comments, please click here. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have now been addressed, so I passed the article. Continue to keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 17:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mixtapes/Compilations

I'm actually well aware that mixtapes aren't really compilations. Especially these days with up and coming rappers and R&B singers' careers in limbo, they release mixtapes to stay relavant. However, in Template:Infobox album, the green color, (which is used for compilation albums) is also used for mixtapes in default, with greatest hits albums, box set albums and remix albums as well. Generally all of them categorized as compilations: "Category:(Year) compilation albums". These days, the main album category (Category:(Year) albums) is only used for studio albums now. Perhaps a discussion should be started about this Mixtapes/Compilations issue, what do you think? QuasyBoy (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Koavf (talk · contribs) is the best person to talk to about that. He is the one that creates most of those sub categories anyway. QuasyBoy (talk) 16:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Hey, could you work on the critical reception section for the Fortune article please? :) Oz ^talk 11:24, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Oz ^talk 21:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outkast albums

Hi! I could not help but notice the amazing work you did on Sir Lucious Left Foot: The Son of Chico Dusty and countless other albums. I was wondering, would you be willing to collaborate with me on Outkast's albums? My goal is to get several of them to GA status. Thank you! Basilisk4u (talk) 20:36, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've got 4 articles I'm working on primarily now, with some upcoming albums articles to work on as well. But whatever little I can do, or discuss, about those Outkast album articles, I'll be happy to do. Dan56 (talk) 21:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I started Southernplayalist... article, and will continue adding prose from more book sources. Dan56 (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imsuchafan (talk) 04:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC) Good Evening Dan, I am not doing any disruptive editing. The editing I am making is based on facts that can be proven by simply going to the liner notes in the album credits. The Inkredibles duo have broken up and it is unfair for either of them to continue to use the name excluding the other hence why the edits were made.[reply]

Re:Audio samples

The ~~policy~~ guideline you cite explicitly points to 64kbps as a suitable quality. Having just under 100 isn't the worst crime in the world, but as the article has been nominated at GAC, everything really needs to be done properly. J Milburn (talk) 20:36, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If something is "usually" done, it's up to you to justify why your samples should not be treated in that way, not up for me to argue that they should. You ask me whether "30 more kilo-whatevers [creates] a potential copyright issue"- I don't know, I'm not a lawyer. I assume it's a somewhat arbitrary line-in-the-sand; from what I know about music production, it seems a fair one, as the lowest rate worth listening to; as I'm sure you know, the non-free content criteria require minimal extent of use- not just "a bit lower than it was before". We need as low as we can go without compromising the usefulness of the content. So- what is it that those 30 extra whatevers are adding to the article, and why are they needed in this case when they would not be normally? J Milburn (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks; I appreciate how it can look like uploading non-free content is an excercise in hoop-jumping. J Milburn (talk) 20:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re: Channel Orange

I think the rule of thumb is generally that if an album's title is stylized, there should be a note in the lead mentioning that, and that the rest of the article uses the most simple version, ie. Channel Orange. But I'm not really an expert on that, though I think channel ORANGE would look awkward. Also, I've just been screwing around with some of his older song articles, if you need any help with the Channel Orange article, I'd offer my assistance. Bruce Campbell (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article. I've added some info from it to the article, thank you. Also, amazing work on your sandbox! Bruce Campbell (talk) 06:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Otis Blue

hello,

I wonder if you could add any content to Otis Blue? It is currently too small despite its importance. I ask you because you contributed to many albums, and you may have independent sources. Regards.--GoP _T ^C _N 17:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your album project

Hey Dan, sorry for eavesdropping but the article you're writing for the album is awesome! Just wanted to let you know, because it's coming up in my google searches lol. Nice writing! – ツ Teammm ^{(talk · email)} 02:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For you edits to life is good. Obtund^Talk 03:19, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kind of ironic, considering. Dan56 (talk) 03:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for 8701

An article that you have been involved in editing, 8701, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rayman⁹⁵ ^(talk) 23:18, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I made the changes to "Tha Carter IV"

I sent you a message because of the change I made on "Tha Carter IV". I deleted the sentece "In a interview with XXL, Lil Wayne hinted that this album may be his last." This obviously makes his ao sense due to the fact that Lil Wayne is currently in production witg Beinh his new album "I Am Not A Human Being Part 2". Please respond soon, thank you for taking your time to read this message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleventhblock (talk • contribs) 16:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Teflon Peter Christ. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page.
Message added 13:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Aaron • ^{You Da One} 13:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Ocean

I'm trying to understand what is wrong with the addition that was made to the artictry section? Had it been removed for some reason? It seems reasonably written and sourced. Insomesia (talk) 14:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are placing incorrect and misleading information

There is no vandalism at all; Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded only sold 578,000 copies not one million, the information you keep reverting is incorrect and misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.115.168.7 (talk) 17:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In response that you posted today; if it did sell 557,000 why do you keep writing it sold one million copies on the commercial performance section of the Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded page. Furthermore, that information is also invalid, a link via HipHopDX confirmed it has sold a total of 578,000 copies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.115.168.7 (talk) 16:33, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sons of Soul

Hmm, interesting, just saw the article. Damn, talk about nicely done! I'll see into it, thanks. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 14:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, I don't know how to add my name to the nomination... I've been on this site for a long time and haven't done something like this. HELP lol BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 14:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thought I had to use a template or something (don't know why I thought that) lol BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 21:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Marvin Gaye article

But hey, while we're on that Sons of Soul trip, I think I need your help concerning the Marvin Gaye page. Apparently I need in-line citations and the like to make the Marvin page a "good/featured article". I wonder if you could help me with that. Probably start a WikiProject: Marvin Gaye thing or something. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 15:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Hi Dan, it's just been pointed out to me that you've broken 3RR on Channel Orange. Please try to avoid doing so, even if your reverts are improvements to the page. Consider asking for semiprotection at WP:RFPP if you have a lot of unconstructive IPs hitting the article. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift article

Hi, on the Taylor Swift main article there is a reference saying Taylor Swift has died on june 18th, there is a little statement and the date of death, i cannot take this off so PLEASE can you remove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KamLehial13 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik

The article Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik for comments about the article. Well done! Kürbis (✔) 08:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rated R

Actually Rated R is a R&B-pop orientated album not Pop-R&B album, it's even stated on the page Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 16:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sources citing sentence in the article did not verify "R&B-pop" or vice versa; only two verified any of those genres. Default to alphabetical order then, pop, then R&B. Dan56 (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's Contemporary R&B then pop Tulisa Marshall '♥ ^{Click On Me} 13:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Contemporary" is only to disambiguate from rhythm and blues, like "music" in "pop music". It's always referred to as "R&B". Dan56 (talk) 15:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eleventhblock: new message

Dan56,

Nas.Com is a collaborative album with Common and this has been confirmed on Nas' biography article. However if you prove me wrong, please remove Nas.Com on The Dreamer, The Believer. Eleventhblock (talk) 19:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay

Then I will try to find reliable sources to prove that Nas.Com is real. And if I do, where do I post the reliable source? Eleventhblock (talk) 19:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New message:Eleventhblock

What websites can I rely on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleventhblock (talk • contribs) 19:55, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New message:smithclark15

Hello, I am the one who made those recent edits to the article "4 (Beyonce Knowles album)". I belong to an internet forum called atrl.net Many Beyonce fans commune there. The point is, "End of Time" was never released as a single in the United States, and only in the United Kingdom. Many people in her fanbase were expecting a US release, but it never materialized. I can give you my word that this happened. It should be pretty obvious considering that there have never been any American radio updates for that song.

Most, importantly, I feel that article should only highlight songs that were released as single in the US and worldwide. Songs released as singles only in certain countries should not be highlighted. "I Care" was an Italian single. "I Was Here" was an Australian single. Those are not highlighted. "End of Time" is only a UK single and therefore should not be highlighted. "Run The World (Girls)", "Best Thing I Never Had", "Countdown" and "Love On Top" are all US/worldwide singles and should be left there. Thank you! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithclark15 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:smithclark15

I apologize. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithclark15 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re: WHAT THE F@CK?!?!?!!

Actually you're the one who needs to learn how to read. As mentioned in that hatnote discussion YOU started, another editor noted "The music naming guidelines are overly brief, but yes, they don't include the qualification with an article: "When necessary, disambiguation should be done using "(band)", "(album)", or "(song)". Unless multiple albums [or songs, one assumes] of the same name exist (such as Down to Earth), they do not need to be disambiguated". There is more than one song called Window Seat, thus SOMETHING is needed and since a simple hatnote is the personification of evil to you, this is the only other solution. --TheTruthiness (talk) 15:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There ALWAYS are, eh? 1 Again, you need to work on your reading/comprehension skills. 1) It's not out of date, the fact that Down to Earth (song) is a dabpage is proving the point (note it includes 3 songs without their own article), and WP:NCM doesn't include the qualification with an article. --TheTruthiness (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rhythm Killers

You're acting as if what I am doing is a bad thing and that a "C" is a bad assessment. I assess purely on content, not additional criteria which is required to be checked to receive even a B-Class rating. Based on the criteria for albums listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Assessment#Quality scale, the article obviously deserves a "C"-class rating right now and, for a brand new article, that is excellent. Most articles begin as "stubs", some get off to a good "start" with some decent info. I'm not blindly assessing anything; I looked at and read the article. It is very well done and I wish you the best in having it reach "GA" status. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kanye West Runaway

Hey Dan56

Why I changed it from 2011 to 2010, was simply due to common sense. The song was released on the 4th of October, 2010. So of course it can't be recorded in april/march of 2011.

Best Regards Hjemloes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjemloes (talk • contribs) 19:12, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. When you recently edited Election Special, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bleeding heart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk back - August 2012 (2)

What? "Get Up" and "I Get It In" were not singles of the album - you can check on the track list. "Ok, You're Right" is a promotional single, so there is no reason for be on "Singles from Before I Self Destruct" Reply me on my talk page. Thank you -SrGangsta —Preceding undated comment added 21:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Input please?

Taylor Swift discography#Can we get a consensus please? ^_^ Swifty*^talk 23:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Album Editing

Thanks Dan. I understand what you're saying about Write Me Back. Should I edit it once more with a citation linking to the website? Will that suffice? (Ebejarred (talk) 04:54, 27 August 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Dan56,

Yes I changed the Keep Reachin' Up article. I can look for a reference. It must be the Obama Re-election Spotify Playlist thing :http://consequenceofsound.net/2012/02/obama-releases-spotify-playlist/

Osmo.DanieleOsmo.Daniele (talk) 18:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GAR

Straight Outta Compton, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 18:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Presley article

Thanks for the heads up on this. I have commented on the Presley talk page. Rikstar⁴⁰⁹ 10:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Hey noticed you undid my edit concerning Dr Dre as Executive Producer of Recovery. I just want you to know I checked the CD case I have and on the back of it says Executive Producer Dr Dre. I re edited it back. Executive Producers seem to come first in the producer list in Eminem album articles.

Thanks, belakfan3 Belakfan3 (talk) 23:57, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Congregation (album)

The article Congregation (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Congregation (album) for comments about the article. Well done! Kürbis (✔) 18:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk on Gorillaz

You are invited on a talk page here --124.184.245.127 (talk) 01:12, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GFID

Listen you, I wrote 80% of the GFID article. I'm HELPING by cleaning & maintaining it. You're the one who's making disruptive edits, because HOLD ME BACK IS CLEARLY a single, released July 2nd (I would know, its the day before my bday). I'm also maintaining the critical response section. The album got great reviews, but the article is only focusing on the bad parts. Leave me alone because I am the reason that the GFID is so bountiful & well-written. RickyRozay (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And as far as the "fan's side of view" thing you put, I disagree. I wrote that article 1000% bias-free, everything there is FACT and sourced. You're abusing power if you ask me. RickyRozay (talk) 12:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wooooow I don't know what your problem is but you really got it out for me huh? ROSS HIMSELF tweeted that the album went Gold, and I sourced that. And I don't know why your so against putting the Artistdirect review, I had it there for the longest time and yo punk ass came and took it off. Wanna explain why? RickyRozay (talk) 02:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I responded on the talk page. RickyRozay (talk) 22:21, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rhythm Killers

The article Rhythm Killers you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rhythm Killers for comments about the article. Well done! Kürbis (✔) 10:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ray Ray

The article Ray Ray you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ray Ray for comments about the article. Well done! Kürbis (✔) 20:54, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Charts

Thanks. Personally I don't see a problem with that, but MOS:CHARTS states that "references should be individual and specific to each chart that is being used." Snap Snap 01:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Girl on Fire (Alicia Keys song)

Hi Dan56, I reverted your recent move of Girl on Fire (Alicia Keys song). The move is not uncontroversial, so please get consensus for the title change on the talk page. There's already a move discussion open on the talk page, although it's about a different issue. Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 21:17, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: "Daughters"

Sorry for the long delay in replying. While I'd be happy to help you improve "Daughters", I'm not sure exactly how my input would be superior to yours at any point: besides, it looks very good already. Your skill with prose is far superior to mine, as evidenced in your expansion of so many album articles, and you also seem to own a copy of Life Is Good, rendering my owning of one irrelevant here. I will, however, put some comments about a few of the references on the talk page, if you'd be interested to read them. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 16:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Born This Way

Who cares if there is one additional picture purely for making the text more readable? Then start deleting pictures from all around Wikipedia. Look at this, so many irrelevant pictures: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_This_Way_Ball. Delete all, but the ones in the Synopsis section! Or look at that one, so many pictures to delete: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_Dream_(Katy_Perry_album). There are so many articles to deal with, deleting pictures is really the BEST way to improve an article, because seriously, who likes looking at pictures? Have a good time. --Sricsi (talk) 22:58, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Life Is Good (Nas album)

The article Life Is Good (Nas album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Life Is Good (Nas album) for comments about the article. Well done! Kürbis (✔) 17:31, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

God Forgives

Hey I only just got around to the discussion you asked me to give my two cents about. Uh, that went off the rails pretty quickly, didn't it? Suffice to say, I agree with you about the article's current state. Given RickyRozay instantly jumped to personal attacks, I'd say contact an admin to help guide the discussion.. WesleyDodds (talk) 12:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ¡Uno!

Sorry I didn't explain my intentions. Anyways, the reason I did that was is because drum/guitar techs, managment and coordinators don't have anything to do with the making of the album, so they shouldn't be listed. And I forgot that Billie Joe did the front cover photo, so I re-added that. And I was also trying to clean the personnel up a bit, because Billie Joe shouldn't be listed as composer in the personnel section, and I thought just listing all the performers and then the technical personnel would be easier and would stop this whole Jason being an official member or not. I was actually trying to improve things. --BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 10:42, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I didn't actually revert you, I just re-added something you removed. And yes, that edit was constructive. It's relavent to the article to mention what days it was released it what countries. And I don't really appreciate the tone of your last message on my talk page. I gave a stupid edit summary as to what I was doing (which you told me to do), so what's your problem? BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 12:13, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, can I at least add that it was released the next day in the US? BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I actually wasn't going to add it to the infobox, I was going to add it to the lead, but now I'll add it to to the release section. BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 12:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's already there, nevermind. BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 12:24, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it wasn't based on personal preference, it was based on what other users have said to me in the past and what other articles use. I never said you didn't know what you were doing, don't put words in my mouth. BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 12:51, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lupe Fiasco's Food & Liquor II: The Great American Rap Album Pt. 1

hey i dont know much about editing wiki and stuff but i was trying to add Soulculture , Djbooth and AllHipHop's ratings to the Critical reception part but it kept saying these sources are not reliable even though Metacrit always uses these sources to calculate metascore 91.99.150.78 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Audio Sample Rationales

Any chance this is of use - http://toolserver.org/~magnus/catscan_rewrite.php?categories=Non-free+images+for+NFUR+review&ns%5B6%5D=1&templates_any=has-NFUR ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:16, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

We have a long standing consensus to abide by the wider Wikipedia consensus to turn lists into prose - see Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Moving infobox reviews into article space. I checked that the contemporary reviews (which is what the Reception section is about) were all in the Reception section, and so removed those from the infobox, and moved that box, which now contains all legacy reviews into the Legacy section. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:12, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At some point someone will hopefully check that the important legacy reviews are turned into prose and so the remains of the infobox can then be removed completely. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings template

By infobox, you mean the ratings template, right? If that's the case, then while it's not mandatory, it's a supplement, and quality articles usually have illustrations in them; wouldnt the template serve as one? How about using the "subtitle" field and distinguishing the scores in one section, release and reception, from a template in the "contemporary appeal" section? Dan56 (talk) 21:15, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The aim is to summarise the reviews in prose. Read through Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Moving infobox reviews into article space. This is a long standing consensus. We first moved the ratings from the infobox into a standalone ratings box as part of the process, knowing that it would take a while to convert the links into prose. We didn't want to lose the information by doing away with the links entirely, so the ratings box was intended as a stop gap measure. What I did in Thriller, was ensure that the contemporary reviews were all summarised, and then moved the box into the Legacy section as the remaining links are all to legacy reviews - that is, those reviews which were not contemporary with the release, but are summarising the album's legacy - its importance as seen in retrospect. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:22, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE FAC

Hey I saw your message to Jivesh about a FAC you nominated. I wouldn't mind leaving comments if you won't mind returning the favor? Best, Jona ^{talk to me} 23:37, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commented. Thanks. Dan56 (talk) 23:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

The Way I See It article looks great! Would you like to comment at the FLC page of Jessica Mauboy discography? — Oz (talk) 22:12, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Socks on Christina Aguilera articles

If you see IPs in the range 91.154.*.* editing on Cristina Aguilera articles, feel free to revert them and let me know. It's Mathiassandell evading his block.—Kww(talk) 19:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tre

Works for me. We just needed to have something I there that makes since. All the like I said I remember hearing that Tre will be a mix of everything and why I still dont think Billie said all of that he said someone to that degree so Ill try to find one but tell them having it in the header is fine with me BlackDragon 00:18, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

K thanks for the link I added it instead and have expanding the section on Tre! BlackDragon 04:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help

You seem like a Wiki expert. I am here to request if you can nominate, We Are the Dury as deletion as it has no source and is hardly worth being a article. --124.184.9.193 (talk) 11:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I apologize for the tone I took and the language I used in my response to you the other day. I will not attempt to excuse my behavior, but merely say that I was dealing with another situation at the same time that I was typing my response to you, and I allowed my frustration to show. As I say, it is no excuse. The topic of genres in regard to Tom Waits has come up so many times before, usually when someone changes them without discussion, and it has grown tedious. What I would like to do is have a centralized discussion somewhere, rather than discussing it on each album's talk page, which seems needlessly repetitive. I hope we can work something out. Cheers. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 19:47, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Teflon Peter Christ. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 11:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Than what can I do

Where will I put the The Re-Up release date? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleventhblock (talk • contribs) 20:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thank u so much! cookie for you!

--mikomango mwa! 02:35, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

You are so right! Thanks for pointing out that I neglected to categorize the kind of edit I made. I will be careful in the future! Mayanalda (talk) 02:10, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ayo, are you gonna nominate this for GA or are you waiting? Bruce Campbell (talk) 00:02, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Leona Lewis proposal

Hello, I have proposed the created of Wikiproject Leona Lewis at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Leona Lewis. Please would you cast a vote or raise any questions in a discussion. Thanks. AARON• ^TALK 14:01, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks. Dan56 (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

	The Music Reviewer Barnstar
	I am so happy to say that "Missing My Baby" is a featured article. Thank you so much for giving a review on a then-stale FAC. All the best and warm wishes, Jona ^{talk to me} 18:50, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done

This user helped promote Otis Blue: Otis Redding Sings Soul to good article status.

Well done! SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 09:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Way I See It

Hello, thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia. I declined your nomination for deletion of The Way I See It as it does not meet WP:R2 ("redirect from the main/article space to any namespace except the Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help: and Portal: namespaces or the main/article space itself, or from the Book: namespace to any other namespace.") Please re-nominate the article for speedy deletion following the criteria for redirects found here. Please note that I made this edit in WP:AGF. Again, thank you for all your contributions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Instant Vintage article

Thank you for your help on the Instant Vintage page, your experience is greatly appreciated. Two classmates and I are attempting to work on this article as part of a first year English Composition course assignment to better align it with the Featured Article criteria and have no experience as Wikipedia editors. Any guidance or assistance you feel inclined to offer on the work we have done thus far or what our next step should be would be more than welcomed...please help! Namaste — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melissaeffie (talk • contribs) 16:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unapologetic

Hey Dan, how are you? I see you added come stuff on Unapologetic, I think we should protect it from IP's as I can see it's constantly edited, bad grammar sentences and non-formatted references are there too. Cheers! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 00:04, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You did good submitting the article there. Well, I am not sure If there will be enough information for creating a separate article for the tour, so I suppose cutting some from Unapologetic regarding the 777 Tour. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 00:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded: The Re-Up

It IS a single from the re-release and so I don't understand why that change is SO wrong! Sorry, anyway, always common regards Eleventhblock (talk) 22:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

srry Eleventhblock (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Seeing as you voraciously edit music articles, I wanted your opinion on something. For critical reviews of music singles, is it necessary that only an article, with heading as "review of song XXX" is acceptable? Because I have seen many single articles which are GA/FA, take the review from articles which might be interviews, or production info of the artist/song/album. I had always thought that the reputation and reliability of the publisher is taken into consideration right? —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 10:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trilogy (The Weeknd album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Remastering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda relevant to you; I had to un-nominate The-Dream album trilogy. GA reviews these days take such an absurdly long time and I'm to busy... I dunno, they would have passed tho. Bruce Campbell (talk) 03:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unapologetic

Hey what's up? I was wondering, why did you removed the Billboard review from the article's Critical reception? With all the respect, I think you prefer the mixed/negative reviews. Maybe I have the wrong impression though. Cheers! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 11:31, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hate how the reviewers give mixed reviews only because of "Nobody's Business" :@, they only mention that one. Idiots. Thanks for the explanation though. But, why can't we have Billboard in the text? — Tomíca^(T2ME) 12:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, yeah, I also expect other reviews which will be more positive. And OMG how can Metacritic include reviews like musicOMH. I can't really understand that -_-'. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 13:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Good Kid, M.A.A.D City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Compton

Miguel (singer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to BET

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kanye and tense

I have posted here for comment. I am pretty sure I'm right, but I'm just a writer, not an English professor. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 04:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Ocean

So let me get this straight, Frank Ocean's albums and songs are considered to be both R&B and neo soul on there respective Wikipedia articles, but you seem to insist that he can only be defined as R&B?--Ropo153 (talk) 19:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble

Can you please comment here. iTunes is rearing its big ugly head again. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 16:07, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I understand

Not sure I understand how labeling an album by an alternative rock band "alternative rock" is being biased ... Sbrianhicks (talk) 00:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFC about iTunes as a source for release histories

Hi, I would appreciate it if you could please take some time to comment at Talk:Trouble_(Leona_Lewis_song)#How_is_iTunes_messed_up. Thanks — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:24, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I smell a sock with User:Malcolmo? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 12:52, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Yes it was just played on 106 & Park im not lying Koala15 (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Koala15[reply]

We need a help to reach a consensus

Hello

We've been confused with an issue regarding the origins of alternative rock with another user and currently we are not able to reach a proper concensus. Our debate continues on our talk pages [1] [2] and unfortunately we're yet to carry on this debate on the talk page of alternative rock. I thought that you could help us on this topic, as you're an experienced contributor to Wikipedia.

Thank you, Myxomatosis75 (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lotus Billboard review

Isn't kinda hypocritical when Taylor Swift's album Red has Billboard's positive review included in the wiki page (and other wiki pages of studio albums too). Also, since the ratings template is only for ratings, we should remove the review of New York Times right? "mixed" is not a review either.Chronisgr (talk) 14:09, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation :-)

PS that editor reverted your edit again Chronisgr (talk) 23:55, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Column divider

I'm not sure, but I reckon Internet Explorer might be the one to blame; I used to have similar problems when I used it (now I use Firefox). I added {{Div col}} because the colums would remain equally divided in case changes were made to the personnel section. Should I switch back to the previous divider? Snap Snap 04:34, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Hi Dan56! You've helped me learn more about Wikipedia! Teamwork makes the dream work! You're appreciated! Kayp22 (talk) 04:01, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

I declined your block request [3], Just because there is not a reference does not make it vandalism. If the info added is clearly wrong, and you know it is wrong because you checked, then it is vandalism. Per WP:PROVEIT you can challenge and remove anything the believe is not true, with the burden of proof resting on the person who want to include the material. Some moderation should be used in the exercise of this rule. If you go around removing the "sky is blue" statements just because they don't have references... If you have any questions please leave a note on my talk page. Jeepday (talk) 23:38, 15 December 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Teflon Peter Christ. You have new messages at Jeepday's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Climax (Usher song)

I don't want to be rude and quick fail the article, but it does not meet the GA criteria at all. I think big additional work is needed before submitting it at GAN. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 22:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The song was a lead single by Usher a lot of other information can be also found for it to be complete. Also The quotes are too long, the release and promotion is too short as is the commercial reception, and the references need additional work.— Tomíca^(T2ME) 22:48, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The point is, you have to make the article look good, then nominated it. I can take it now and quickly fail it, right? And about the release history, try amazon and itunes, it can look a lot better. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 22:55, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Billboard "Top"

Understood. Snap Snap 01:07, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Xmas & Happy New Year

	Merry Christmas
	May this lovely Christmas season bring you delights in all possible forms. May you receive love in abundance and joy that lasts throughout this season. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year wishes to you and your loved ones! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 23:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tinashe Edits

This has been discussed on the talk page for Tinashe, but a verified Twitter account is a reliable source. Other than that, there are only Instagram and Facebook posts, both of which are confirmed official from the verified Twitter page. Regardless, it states "as its only attribution is to self-published sources" which is incorrect. If you check the sources, a good majority of them are not written by Tinashe, but from verifiable sources such as MuuMuse.com, MTV Buzzworthy, LoveBScott.com, Tommy2.net, All Access Music, Elle Girl and VIBE. I don't think that the tag is necessary at all, seeing as none of those are self-published sources. Stunners (talk) 17:46, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Teflon Peter Christ. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
Message added 04:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:...listiccadillacmuzik

Guess something was wrong with my PC, it literally just played for one second and stopped, haha! No offense. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 11:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Late Registration

This user helped promote Late Registration to good article status.

Well done. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 11:32, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"I Care 4 U" single release

In regards to this change, both this ref and this one suggest that it was in fact released as a single, with a song called "Don't Worry" as its B-side. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 14:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I knew Discogs was not the most reliable source, but it was the only other example of a possible release I could find. It just seems an unusually high chart position for an album cut. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 14:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as the Discogs reference comes with a picture of the CD itself, I'd presumed that this was more practical evidence suggesting that it had been released as a single. It would help if we knew someone with a copy. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 14:54, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Coexist (album)

The article Coexist (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 5 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Coexist (album) for things which need to be addressed. Tomcat (7) 22:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Coexist (album)

The article Coexist (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Coexist (album) for comments about the article. Well done! Tomcat (7) 10:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sgt. Pepper's...

Hello, Teflon Peter Christ. You have new messages at Richerman's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ip

IPs always change, since I'm using wireles,, the IPs change constantly. Otherwise I'll have to make an account.

2601:A:4100:5A:2882:BFE1:1FED:C2E4 (talk) 01:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]