User talk:Sola2012

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Sola2012! Thank you for your contributions. I am Charlesdrakew and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Charles (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Hi. You have to be registered for a few days and have made ten edits on other pages before you can edit semi-protected pages. It is a defence against vandalism by new users until they prove reliable.--Charles (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Groban's future plans

I reverted your recent edit at Josh Groban because the material involved a prediction from the future. Please see Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We can't put into the biographies all the plans and promises made by a person on some talk show. It is just not worth an entry into the biography, until the album actually comes out. Otherwise, you could enter a theoretical statement by Groban that he is planning to read David Copperfield this weekend, in honor of the 200th anniversary of Dickens' birth! You can see how ridiculous this could become. --Skol fir (talk) 04:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Illuminations (Josh Groban album). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. A forum is not a reliable source - see WP:RS Bob Re-born (talk) 06:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

hi sola$$$$$$$$ (talk) 15:33, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	hello sola$$$$$$$$ (talk) 20:39, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My only comment here is -- "The Original Barnstar -- This barnstar, the first on Wikipedia, is given to recognize particularly fine contributions to Wikipedia, to let people know that their hard work is seen and appreciated." Apparently, you, Sola2012, think very highly of yourself (this Barnstar was self-appointed!). Be careful of arrogance. Humility would be better. --Skol fir (talk) 18:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Doo-Wops & Hooligans. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This site is not a reliable source. Dan56 (talk) 22:00, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Doo-Wops & Hooligans have been reverted again. Please do not add http://www.musicharts.net/ as a source, or content cited with it. It is not reliable. It's content is not based on any sales tracking system like Nielsen SoundScan (Billboard (magazine)) If you still insist, ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Dan56 (talk) 19:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sola2012

Hello, Sola2012. You have new messages at Pusillanimous's talk page.
Message added 16:08, 6 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Sola2012. You have new messages at Pusillanimous's talk page.
Message added 23:31, 6 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Another reminder - March 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you.

It's simple enough to understand and helps us clearly recognise when and who commented. Thanks. --Chip123456 (talk) 19:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi. if you want to chat and want some help just contact me.ASS(as in donkey) (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message alert

Hello, Sola2012. You have new messages at Skol fir's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Skol fir (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. When you recently edited Back to Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sola2012. You have new messages at Paul MacDermott's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Paul MacDermott (talk) 18:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published sources

Please refrain from using self-published sources such as blogs and forums, as you did at Katy Perry discography and Talk That Talk. Your edits have been reverted.

Anyone can create a personal web page and claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published media, such as personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources. If the information in question is really worth reporting, someone reliable will probably have done so. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Demi by Demi Lovato may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{album

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Jennifer Lopez Como una Mujer album booklet and cd case.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jennifer Lopez Como una Mujer album booklet and cd case.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Lungs

Calculating worldwide sales based on certifications goes against WP:OR. You have to find a reliable source that explicitly states that the album has sold 5 million copies. Snap Snap 00:11, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Como Ama una Mujer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Duran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edits

Hello, firstly, I am sorry to revert your sales updates which spanned several articles and I appreciated the fact you updated with a source a lot. However, to me, the figures provided from that source are a little off. I especially think so when I realised the source was published in December 2011 (when many of those albums were no where near those figures). Anyhow, I started a discussion over here for some opinions, and you're obviously welcome to give yours! —JennKR | ☎ 20:30, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rihanna discography

I reverted your edit to the sales total as the source you provided it unreliable. Adabow (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sola2012. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sola2012. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]