User talk:RickyRozay

Talk to me!

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to Teflon Don (album), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:00, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

what was unconstructive & how come I dont get a welcome to wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RickyRozay (talk • contribs) 01:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe a Tweet is a reliable source for that claim, then I can't help you. Dan56 (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Convertible Burke

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Convertible Burke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO A&E⇑ 05:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to David Stern ‎ . Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 00:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Indianapolis Colts season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page QB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

God Forgives, I Don't (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Detox

Self Made Vol. 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Birdman

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rick Ross, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 21:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from God Forgives, I Don't. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 01:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to God Forgives, I Don't, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 02:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at God Forgives, I Don't. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:05, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.

If you need help editing,

Check out the tutorial.
Wanting to create an article? Use the article wizard.
See the manual.

Cheers,
Riley Huntley _talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 01:29, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

Unfortunately I don't really know enough about the article subject to determine what information is fake and what is legit, which I'd need to do to determine whether page protecting would be appropriate (or if it's just one or two people that need to be blocked). You should go to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection and make a request there; someone that monitors that page should be able to make a determination more easily than I. —Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

God Forgives I Don't

I'm sorry, but your complaint is completely unjustified. This source agrees with the production credits that I added: you probably know more about the album than I do, but I assure you I was acting in good faith here. I certainly wouldn't have added them if I was certain they were fake. Thank you. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 13:40, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GFID listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect GFID. Since you had some involvement with the GFID redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Jawadreventon (talk) 15:44, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to God Forgives, I Don't, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at God Forgives, I Don't, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at God Forgives, I Don't. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:02, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now that youve decided to communicate (rather dismissively ) I opened a post at Talk:God_Forgives,_I_Don't#POV_changes to get othe editors' two cents and clear up this dispute. Dan56 (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's a 10 review limit for the ratings template (Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_guide#Critical_reception) Self-published sources such as Instagram (which RapRader.com cites) are not reliable. The album doesnt show up at the RIAA's online database search. Dan56 (talk) 01:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to User:Dan56. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I explained with the preceding comment here and with an edit summary, which you do not use nor take heed to, as well as the article's talk page, which you ignored. Dan56 (talk) 02:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop making unconstructive edits to this article. I responded to your comment about this edit (check summary, too), yet you continue to disregard WP guidelines. The original release date and label are for the infobox, per Template:Infobox album#Released and #label. Would have been courteous to give an edit summary. Continuing to go against these guidelines could result in loss of editing privileges. Dan56 (talk) 23:25, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you didnt create its release history section, then you should of at least noticed it. The album was first released on the 30th by Mercury Records. Dan56 (talk) 23:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:GFIDPromoPoster1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GFIDPromoPoster1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:3KingsRozay.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:3KingsRozay.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to God Forgives, I Don't. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did here at God Forgives, I Don't, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 03:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop engaging in fancruft. Removing "generally" (cited in the article) and adding "charted well..." (unsupported) as you did here to God Forgives, I Don't is an attempt to water down language, along with editing solely on one topic. Dan56 (talk) 05:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Rick Ross, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 05:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did here on User talk:Dan56. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dan56 (talk) 03:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S., I'm not an admin. Dan56 (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

This post will not help.

Ariconte (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Could you explain a little bit what exactly he did? Nobody can do anything about it if nobody knows what happened.

Austinuity (talk) 17:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GOAT (duo)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GOAT (duo) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Bfigura ^(talk) 02:40, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to God Forgives, I Don't because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! STATic message me! 03:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mastermind (Rick Ross album). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. STATic message me! 19:38, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm TYelliot. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Portugal, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 22:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Calvin999. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to So Help Me God (album) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — ₳aron 20:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MMGPressConference.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MMGPressConference.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Ross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fashionista. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RickyRozay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:Jennica. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RickyRozay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]