Jump to content

User talk:Significa liberdade/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Do you remember general director Julius Koritschoner?
Would you like to take a look at my next rough draft? Emil Kahane
My head is spinning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Emil_Kahane --Virtualiter (talk) 21:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Virtualiter -- Thank you for reaching out for help! At present, I'm having trouble sorting through the Emil Kahane draft to understand his importance. It's worth noting that you can also create drafts in the draft space or in your sandbox. There, you can work on an article without it needing to meet various Wikipedia standards. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:31, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

[3] Are you typing all this yourself? Hopefully you realize that the source code becomes uneditable with something like that. --Virtualiter (talk) 17:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Virtualiter: I did not type all that myself. I used a tool called ReFill. Can you explain how the source code became uneditable? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, take a look at this. Because of all the table formatting in the source text, you can no longer see where the story continues. 1166 Bytes is an halfe article!! --Virtualiter (talk) 10:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
@Virtualiter: It looks like the "book" cited there is a collection of essays. Do you know which essay you were citing? If so, the list of authors could be shorter. I tried searching the book for some of the information in the cited sentence but couldn't find the exact essay. Also, it may be helpful to edit using the Visual Editor -- at least sometimes -- to get around cumbersome citations. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:58, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
The article from Raymond Bardeen Ladoo[4]. Serial No. 2142 (as single essay). How could ReFill read the name? But shouldn't it be enough to just give Google Books the page number? --Virtualiter (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
@Virtualiter: Reference updated. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, I think I've run out of ideas. Would you like to take another look? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Eduard_Elbogen --Virtualiter (talk) 20:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @Significa liberdade ? --Virtualiter (talk) 18:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Virtualiter: I'll add it to my to-do list, but I can't promise I'll get to it quickly. I have a lot of work on my plate right now and am using Wikipedia mostly to relax when I have time. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @Significa liberdade
I don't want to be annoying, but I'll soon be disappearing into the archives. --Virtualiter (talk) 13:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @Virtualiter: Thanks for touching base. At this point, the article is beyond my expertise. I would recommend submitting for review to receive feedback from other editors. :) Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Recent BLPPROD of a band

BLPPRODs do not apply to bands, see this discussion. mwwv converse∫edits 17:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, @Mwwv! I had questioned whether a band would be considered a BLP in this case and got a different response elsewhere. Good to know! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Afternoon Men, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duckworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kathy Hytten

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kathy Hytten".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:11, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

Novels and WP:BOOKS

I've noticed you add WP:BOOKS banners to articles on fiction books; the scope of the project is explicitly "coverage of non-fiction books on Wikipedia." Considering that I actively remove WP:BOOKS from fiction articles, I feel like we may be running in circles. Could you stop adding them to fiction articles, or if I am inaccurate about the scope could we have a wider discussion about this? PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, @PARAKANYAA! I had just started doing this a few days ago (I believe), so I can certainly stop! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:24, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
No worries, it's just the distinction between WP BOOKS and WP NOVELS is very useful to my personal workflow and I felt us simultaneously doing the opposite thing was maybe counterproductive haha. Thank you for all your work on book articles! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:26, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, @PARAKANYAA! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
PARAKANYAA: Also... I see you've already been invited to join the New Page Patrol but haven't requested permissions. We would love it if you could come join us! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:42, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Oh yeah, I requested perms for that a long time ago, before I was appropriately qualified, I'd say, but I haven't gotten around to reapplying yet now that I am more qualified. I will likely request sometime, thank you for the reminder! PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:46, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Betty Griffin Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betty Griffin Center, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Griffin Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Laura Rendón

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Laura Rendón".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Chapman

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robert Chapman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E'en So, Lord Jesus, Quickly Come, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wheaton College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Luke Beardon

Information icon Hello, Significa liberdade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luke Beardon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Handball Euro articles

What is your problem with the 2030/32 men's and women's EHF Euro articles? They meet all requirements and in the past, these were already created after the bids were announced. I put these articles in my sandbox for future use so you will always have a problem with it. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 10:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you provide a link to the articles, ILoveSport2006? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
2032 European Women's Handball Championship, 2030 European Women's Handball Championship, 2030 European Men's Handball Championship, 2032 European Men's Handball Championship. All deleted even though they meet requirements. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
@ILoveSport2006: These pages were recreated following a deletion discussion, primarily because it's too soon to create the article: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2032 European Women's Handball Championship, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2030 European Women's Handball Championship, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2030 European Men's Handball Championship, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2032 European Men's Handball Championship. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
That is not what I'm asking. That was back in January. Back then, no official bids were confirmed but in June 2024, the official bids came out and thus, I brought the articles back. So why are they being deleted now? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Explicit, Theleekycauldron, Liz: Would you like to provide input on this since you officially deleted the articles? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Again, that's not what I am asking. Why did have they been deleted again now? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 23:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
@Significa liberdade @Explicit @Theleekycauldron @Liz Can I have a response? It's has been three days people. Why were my pages deleted when at the same stage of the bidding process in the past (back in 2021 for the 2026/2028 EHF Euro), the articles were already created and validated. So am I not allowed a response from people who probably don't even know what articles I am talking about and or remember that they deleted them? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 21:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
I s'pose they're not "substantially identical" if they've passed the bidding stage, although I don't think that addresses the reason for deletion – there's not much to say here, it's too early. I'm happy to restore it and someone can take it to AfD, I guess? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
@Theleekycauldron Can you do that please? I would really appreciate it.
People have started editing those pages probably thinking this would continue to exist.
@Significa liberdade deleted it saying that it needs to be speedily deleted because it was a article that had already been deleted prior (or something along the lines of that. But before the articles are inevitably deleted because when I contest it, my voice doesn't matter, I copy them all for future use when more info comes out so @Significa liberdade will always have a problem with them if that's his problem with the articles.
So when the official bids came out in June, I brought back the pages and I think they were 100% wrongfully deleted. I could understand the deletion a bit more in January 2024, but since then, with the official bids being known, they shouldn't have been deleted again. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 22:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
ILoveSport2006: As I note, I did not delete the articles. I nominated them for speedy deletion, and then one of the editors I named above actually deleted the articles. Articles previously deleted via discussion may be tagged for speedy deletion, but then not deleted because they are significantly different from the previous article or enough has changed. For example, there may be a deletion discussion about an actor early in their career where the community decides the person is not notable enough for Wikipedia's standards. A few years later, another editor may create a new page, and an editor like myself might see the page was deletion via discussion and tag is for speedy deletion. Then another editor with special privileges might look at the article and say, "This actor has received much more media coverage than the last discussion, so I reject the speedy deletion." In the case of the handball articles, it's up to that editor to determine if the new article has enough sources and is different enough from the previous articles to determine it is no longer too soon for the articles. Does that make sense? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
I've undeleted the two I deleted. Someone else is welcome to take them to AfD if they want to. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 07:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Osyana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osyana, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osyana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Deep (Dunmore novel)

Hi, just letting you know I reverted your redirect of this article. I honestly don't have a problem with merging the book articles with the Ingo tetralogy article, but it should be all four novels. Just taking out one leaves an annoying gap; it bothers me. -- Robina Fox (talk) 14:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Robina Fox: Can you find sources to establish notability for this article? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. I added a couple of refs. Not very substantial, but still... -- Robina Fox (talk) 15:43, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Hi, @Robina Fox: Thanks for adding those sources! However, when adding sources to an article, please make sure the sources are reliable, independent, and provide significant coverage of the subject. This is how notability is established. Another user has determined that the sources added were not adequate to establish notability. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Note

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AJohnchristo42&redlink=1

one of many indian users with lack of language/writing/formal skills, i notice around sport pages; ban would be very helpful. regards! Cenderabird (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Cenderabird: We typically don't ban user simply because they lack writing skills as they can contribute to Wikipedia in multiple ways beyond writing, such as by adding citations. Further, pages can be tagged to note there are grammatical issues, which another editor can address without necessary creating the content. If you think this editor is otherwise engaging in question able behaviour, I recommend checking out Wikipedia's article about bans. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of IV.AI for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IV.AI, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IV.AI (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

RfA nomination?

Hey there, Significa liberdade! Clovermoss and I have been working together to find users who would make great candidates at RfA and great admins – I was a little surprised to see your name on the list, because I thought you were an admin already! I've seen your name around a bunch, with only positive impressions. You have a great content record, do lots of work in admin-like spaces, and seeing the way you handled this thread on your talk only convinced me more. If you're interested in becoming an admin, let me know! We can talk more here, or you can find me on email or Discord (same username). thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Theleekycauldron (and Clovermoss)! Thank you for the kind words! I mainly haven't considered RfA because I'm not sure how I would use any of the additional privileges given my current strengths, background, interests, etc. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
You might find my approach to this in my RfA interesting because I also didn't have a strong "need" for the tools. I genuinely believe that a few more people pitching in where they can is good but I also understand completely if the RfA process itself makes you hesitant. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Seconded – we could always use more admins who are willing to help out wherever they can. If you're looking for a place to get comfortable with the tools, I think you could put your experience at CSD and AfD to good use dealing with other people's nominations :) from there, you can branch out! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Amazing Rain (novel).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Amazing Rain (novel).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you so much for your work in significantly expanding Wilfred Beckerman. I really appreciate it! Whoareuagain (talk) 08:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphan article Zion Richardson

Greetings, Today I de-orphaned this article by adding a link at List of people from Indianapolis, Athletes section. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 02:07, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, @JoeNMLC! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:11, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for all of your help and great edits, on the Lauren Chen article. You are greatly appreciated! PaulPachad (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, PaulPachad! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Tim Bowden

I see you have "Books: removed primary refs" from the article on Tim Bowden. It would be helpful if you point me to the guideline that specifies this should be the case. Oronsay (talk) 01:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Oronsay! Thanks for reaching out with your question. For the Tim Bowden article, I removed the references in the book section and replaced the name of the book with {{citation}}/{{cite book}}. As such, the full reference for each book is there, but it doesn't show up as an in-text citation. I don't know if there is a specific policy about this, but it is common practice for articles relating to authors. Feel free to revert if you find policy or think it's better off the other way. =) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt reply. On reflection, it looks better now. Oronsay (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
The ISBN format can be very difficult to access info compared to Trove entries where internally the trove link has much more reader friendly information: an exmaple might be McCrae, Hugh; McCrae, Hugh, 1876-1958. Poems. Selections (1911), Satyrs and sunlight (Second ed.), Thomas C. Lothian, retrieved 8 September 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) the url to the trove work id is identified - the book is a long time before ISBNs - the Tim items have no url included only ISBN. I am adding this as FYI and have no intention to edit the item further at this stage, I am not 100% sure that Trove entry ISBN is a default option compared to the pre-ISBN items. Apologies to the intrusion on this subject. JarrahTree 12:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your input, JarrahTree! We can certainly add the Trove link to the bibliography reference. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
very kind of you to respond that way - I thought I was having a true senior moment - maybe my lack of getting a hang of ISBN stuff, then was having trouble of properly identfiying the correct work/xxxx number was causing further stress about the issue... sigh... JarrahTree 13:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deborah Lutz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guggenheim Foundation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

NPOV

I fail to see how an article about the family of three Japanese Prime Ministers is not notable per WP:NPOV. There are articles about notable political families such as the Kennedy family or Udall family. The article does need expansion, not removal. --Plumber (talk) 21:33, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Plumber! Thanks for reaching out with your concern. The article for the Satō–Kishi–Abe family has not been removed from Wikipedia; rather, it have been moved into the draft space, where you and others can continue working on it. It was moved to the draft space because it only used a single source. If you look at the other articles you mentioned (i.e., about the Kennedys and the Udalls), you'll notice that they have many sources to highlight the families' notability. As an autoconfirmed user, you may move the Satō–Kishi–Abe family article back into the main space if you object to the draftification, though I would suggest adding at least 1-2 more sources before doing so. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the clarification, I was not fully aware of how the draft space worked. --Plumber (talk) 15:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
You're welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Shafeev Award and Fojtik Henglein Award

I saw that you had declined and requested revdel on Draft:Shafeev Award, which was created by the author of Draft:Fojtik Henglein Prize, an article that has most certainly the same issues that I foolishly accepted a day or two again. Appreciate if you could take a look at it quickly and see if there's anything else I missed since it's very similar. Thank you, Reconrabbit 23:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Reconrabbit! I haven't been able to check for similarities through Earwig while it's searching the internet. However, checking against the cited sources doesn't seem to bring anything up, and neither does a more general Google search. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

I know how stressful it can be to receive thoughtful and critical opposes. I know you'll take their feedback into consideration, as you have before and I admire your resilience, and no matter the outcome of the RfA, hope you take care of yourself and continue to be a net positive to the community. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 11:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
🥰 thank you so much, Shushugah! I’m already reflecting on and implementing feedback. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 12:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Audie Award for Fiction Narrator

Information icon Hello, Significa liberdade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Audie Award for Fiction Narrator, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Hang in there

As someone who's RfA was pretty contentious, I know that this is stressful. But the stress will pass, and I think you will too. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, @Ad Orientem! <3 Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:21, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
I came here to say the same thing. The RFA is still ten points outside of the discretionary zone. I think most people opposing seem to tacitly accept that you are going to pass, and they want to make sure you've heard the concerns that have been expressed, which is fair enough. I got beat up on about the nuances of speeedy deletion as well, I tried to make the point, which I believe you have touched on as well, that there is a world of difference between nominating somethibg for CSD and actually just deleting it yourself. You got this. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, Just Step Sideways! <3 Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
I know I used it as "dear admin, please look at this, is it bad?" at least a couple of times before someone kindly told me not to bother admins about drafts that will just time out anyway... -- asilvering (talk) 23:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
@Significa liberdade, I admire your patience and it will pay off in the next ten hours. I won't say anything now till that time since Asilvering is already here, indirectly, to drop the baton. Congrats in advance. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

A baton for you!

The new admin baton
When I said I was pumped to hand over this WP:BATON, I meant it. Welcome to the janitorial cabal. This bin is all yours now.

Congratulations on your successful RfA, Significa liberdade! May your mopping be as successful as the RfA. asilvering (talk) 22:28, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Congrats!

Do good stuff with the mop. Cheers Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 22:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! <3 Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
You did it. Welcome to the NIONTDRBSCC (not in or near the discretionary range but still controversial club)! (We are working on the name.) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 22:37, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
lol, thanks, HouseBlaster. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:51, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

adele bloch-bauer 1 revertion

hi, i can see why those categories were reverted, but just so you know why i put them there - the painting was featured in the movie 'woman in gold' with helen mirren so i put them there because of the fact the movie centers around that whole story and painting - but perhaps that is stretching it. sometimes i don't know if categories are being stretched unreasonably, i didn't view it that way but i can see why you did. let me know your thoughts so i can learn from it thx Gregorcollins (talk) 17:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Gregorcollins! Thank you for reaching out with your question. Looking at the Adele Bloch-Bauer article, it appears that Cmr08 deleted several categories specifically related to the film. I understand that it can sometimes be confusing to know the boundaries of how to categorize something. Categories are specifically used for people trying to find similar information. For example, if I wanted to learn about American presidents, I could go to the category Presidents of the United States. It would probably be confusing if, in that list, I saw Bill Burr and Dennis Quaid alongside George Washington and Barack Obama, even though Burr and Quaid have played presidents in films. Similarly, if someone is interested in films scored by Hans Zimmer, they would likely be confused if they saw Adele Bloch-Bauer. I hope this makes sense. Let me know if you have further questions. :) Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
i gotcha. thank you for the very clear explanation! Gregorcollins (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
You're welcome, Gregorcollins! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
I haven't been online since yesterday, so I only got this notice now. I'm sorry if I caused any problems, but as far as I knew those categories were not ones that the article about a person should be in. I should have left more than an edit summary. I was actually just about to remove the categories that didn't belong from Issa Ibrahim that same editor added, but I'll leave a talk page message instead. Cmr08 (talk) 02:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kawa model

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kawa model you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 06:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Congrats and thanks

Thanks for answering my question in your RfA. I apologize that I did not see the answer in time to make a !vote, but I trust that your new admin tools will be used well. Congrats! Ed [talk] [OMT] 07:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, @The ed17! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations in advance!

Though I am in the opposition, the result of the RfA is clear enough, with but a few hours left (and I strongly doubt I can jinx it), and I extend my congratulations in advance on getting the mop. I'll admit that I'm still uncomfortable with some of your draftifications and AfDs, but I hope you'll take the advice there on board and be a great sysop. And I'm sorry if my opposition caused you discomfort, or came across as too negative or brusque: I know that negative comments at a stressful forum like RfA can go down badly with the candidates. As such, your friendly and respectful demeanor, especially with the opposers, amidst all the stress of the RfA, impressed me greatly. All in all, I wish you the best in your future work as an editor as well as a sysop. I expect you'll do well enough too. JavaHurricane 16:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, JavaHurricane! I really appreciate it, and I am certainly reflecting on the feedback received to help become a better editor and (fingers-crossed that the sky doesn't fall) a good admin. Please don't be afraid to point out areas of concern in the future. =) Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Similar to JavaHurricane, congrats from an oppose voter! The consensus was clear trust in your willingness to keep learning as an already excellent editor, so I wish you luck in continued productive and enjoyable work here🥳! Your hard work on literature articles is sincerely appreciated! BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 02:04, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, BluePenguin18! I appreciate it. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Your new garb! Hope this fits.

I couldn't close this one for obvious reasons, but I thought I'd extend my congratulations, deliver your T shirt and welcome you to the admin cadre. You handled yourself well in the last week. Take care, and when you get bored of scrabbling down the back of the sofa to find the right block message, have a look in my Monobook. Some kind soul put some code there that produces a nifty dropdown menu. ϢereSpielChequers 21:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Aw man, you beat me to the t-shirt. And we're all out of flamethrowers at the moment. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:35, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

2023–24 Liga V moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2023–24 Liga V. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 05:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

RFA successful

Congratulations Significa liberdade! Your RfA was successful. You are now an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I hope you have just as happy a time editing in the future as you did before your RfA. You may want to look at the admin guide to read up on any tools you are unfamiliar with. Primefac (talk) 22:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Felicitations. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, Primefac! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Oof, you must be glad that's over. Take a breath. Ask lots of questions, especially when you're in doubt. WP:ADMINCOND and WP:ADMINACCT are really really important. Thanks for stepping up to serve your community in what is often a thankless and unseen job. Mkdw talk 23:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Congrats on your successful RfA. I know you will keep on doing what you do best (but now with some extra buttons).Have a nice time on-and-off-wiki...🎊 Volten001 ☎ 03:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Sending parabéns :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Obrigada, Vanderwaalforces! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations! Welcome to the corps. —Ganesha811 (talk) 11:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, Significa liberdade. Although I opposed, your responses to editors' concerns assure me that you will use them to become a better editor, and I look forward to seeing the good you'll do as an administrator. 😎👍 Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 18:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Hello, Significa liberdade,
I just saw that you deleted an article I tagged which made me realize that you are an admin now! Congratulations! If you have questions, do not hesitate asking a fellow admin for advice. We are here to help. There are an awful lot of scripts and editing tools that exist to make the job easier, I encourage you to look at our js pages and copy any that appear to be useful or go to Wikipedia:User scripts/List and browse through the list. Good luck! Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, Liz!! I'll make sure to go through those pages. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

About your comments on my talk page

What did you mean by “provides evidence to the contrary”, and how could I improve my mentorship responses? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi, AirshipJungleman29: Thanks for asking! Based on my reading, some of your responses on your talk page come across passive aggressive, such as your response to an arbitration notification. Although you may have disagreed with this case being brought to arbitration--found it silly even!--you can respond to the situation in a more civil manner.
As for the mentorship responses, I find them to be quite curt, and at times, can read as though you are annoyed. For example, when Luyabd asked about how to create an article, you responded, "The links on your talk page might be helpful." This is true; the links are available on their talk page. However, such a response can come off as rude, especially because tone of voice, gestures, etc. aren't available via text. When working with newbies, it's important to make the Wikipedia environment seem as friendly and inviting as possible. During mentorship, this can mean encouraging them to ask questions. I also find it valuable to have a response answer the question more directly so the user doesn't click around and go somewhere else to find a quick answer to their question.
I hope that helps! Let me know if you have any follow-up questions, comments, and/or concerns. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Hmm. I can see the mentorship thing and will work on that, but I would have thought WP:PACT would apply to an editor using LLMs to deny AI generation. If those are the standards required it's definitely a good thing this is going the way it is. Anyway, thanks very much for your honesty and quick response, and I'll see you around. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
AirshipJungleman29: To my understanding, PACT indicates that there are times when it's understandable to not AGF. There are many ways to respond to incredulous behaviour from other editors, including not responding. In a situation like the one mentioned, people in arbitration may clearly see the other editor as in the wrong without you ever having to say a word. However, your response to others reflects on you. As an admin, it's expected that people will get upset with you for many reasonable behaviours, such as deleting their copy-paste article. It's also often expected that you will de-escalate the situation (unless a block is required, in which case don't feed the trolls). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
That's probably true yeah, thanks. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:56, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Congratulations

Hi, congrats on becoming an admin! Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 17:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, Alextejthompson! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Baton and admin elections

Hi, Significa liberdade, congratulations on your successful RfA! I still have a question about the baton.

If a candidate elected under WP:AELECT passes, will you be passing your baton to them, or do you think that baton passing should only be for RfA admins, not AELECT admins? It is sorry to see that you will not be passing your baton to AirshipJungleman29. GTrang (talk) 14:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

This is a great question. We may want to discuss at WT:BATON. My instinct is to give everyone elected a baton and one of them volunteers to be the one to pass it on after the next RFA or election. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
+1, or just give the responsibility to the one with the highest pass margin. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Userpage

Can you delete my userpage? CometVolcano (talk) 13:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

CometVolcano: Green tickY Done! :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. But please delete it again. --CometVolcano (talk) 14:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
(talk page stalker)  Done, but why would you recreate it only to request it be deleted again a minute or two later? Elli (talk | contribs) 14:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
I'm going to skip spamming your notifications with more thanks and just give you this to express how relieved I am that you've been attending to this so promptly (and taught me how to use copyvio-revdel). TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 01:59, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, @TheTechnician27! I'm happy to help. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

welcome

Please add more plot, information and actors who have recently joined Kuruluş: Osman season 6. 41.35.144.159 (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Significa liberdade for accumulating at least 200 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

Rack and pinion Award

This award is given in recognition to Significa liberdade for accumulating at least 15 points during each week of the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Ultra Street Fighter

Ultra Street Fighter is a disambiguation page like Super Street Fighter, not an article, I added disambig, can I move it back to the original page now? Counterdoom (talk) 16:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Counterdoom! You can move the article back to the main space now since it's a disambiguation page. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dexter in the Dark

Hello, Significa liberdade

You made a formatting mistake closing this AFD. Please install XFDcloser if you want to help out at AFD, it sometimes has glitches but it's practically foolproof. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I'll install that now. :) Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder of Jackie Vandagriff has been accepted

Murder of Jackie Vandagriff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:00, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Review on the draft Draft:Murder of Jackie Vandagriff

@Significa liberdade Hello good day once again thanks for your review on the Draft:Murder of Jackie Vandagriff in which you mentioned something about copyright gotten from this https://people.com/crime/jacqueline-vandagriff-killer-charles-bryant-she-died-during-sex/ which am a bit confuse the part which I believed you where referring to was actually like a quote in which I highlighted so am a bit surprise its been tagged as copyright and I can see that you removed that part already so why the declining the draft if you have removed the affected part Afro 📢Talk! 18:11, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Afrowriter! Thank you for reaching out with your question! There weren't any issues with the quotation itself, given that you put it in quotation marks and included a citation. I only removed the quotation because it didn't seem relevant to the overarching 'story' of the article. I declined the article because there was some close paraphrasing, which I rephrased. After cleaning up the close paraphrasing, I decided to resubmit for review from another editor. I hope this helps! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
@Significa liberdade No issue its fine am glad that the issue was resolved and has now been accepted and moved to the mainspace. As a i am a big fan of Criminological Theories of Murder and have been doing some research on cases similar to this and doing some writings you can as well take a look at Draft:Murder of Andreen McDonald and Draft:Murder of Mandy Stavik when you are less busy. Afro 📢Talk! 20:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Admin debrief

Hello, Significa liberdade. Congratulations on your successful RfA. At The Signpost, we'd like to make admin WP:DEBRIEFs a regular feature. If you're considering writing one, we'd be happy to publish it. There's no deadline, so if you decide to put one together, we'd be happy to include it in whatever the upcoming issue is. Here are the last two we published for reference: HouseBlaster and asilvering. Svampesky (talk) 16:42, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Process of Elimination.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Process of Elimination.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Quantico (novel)
added a link pointing to Mariposa
Red Thunder (novel)
added a link pointing to Worlds Without End

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Persecution of Greeks in Communist Albania

Draft:Persecution of Greeks in Communist Albania It's been a year, and the draft still hasn't been improved - and I don't think it can be improved because there's a structural problem. The Greeks who were expelled were not expelled because of their nationality, but because of their beliefs. Is it not time to delete it? LefterDalaka (talk) 18:47, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, LefterDalaka! Drafts that have not been edited by a human editor within the past six months will be deleted via G13. If you think this drat (or any other), qualifies for speedy deletion, you may nominate it yourself using the appropriate criteria. Otherwise, it's generally best practice to let stale, non-notable drafts reach their 6-month expiration. I hope this helps! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:06, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Audie Award for Fiction Narrator

Hello, Significa liberdade. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Audie Award for Fiction Narrator".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Tale of the Troika

Your edit was:

19:11, October 15, 2024 Significa liberdade talk contribs 2,032 bytes +44‎ Added

tag

In fact, in such situations the tag nofootnotes is better be used. --Altenmann >talk 02:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

MAPs aren't a hoax

This isn't true that it's a hoax that simply isn't true. Here's an example that it's currently being used (https://forum.map-union.org/). SCM123ABC (talk) 01:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Do you have any reliable, independent sources regarding this topic? Thus far, other editors have not been able to do so, which is why Minor-Attracted Person directs to a Wiktionary definition. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Yeah you probably right. Well the movement is in it's early stretches maybe in a couple years they'll be more. SCM123ABC (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I notice you might be getting a lot of notifications that I'm reverting you. If you look again, you'll realize this is unintended on my part. Here's an apologetic cookie. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kawa model

The article Kawa model you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kawa model for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Wolverine XI -- Wolverine XI (talk) 16:24, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:James W. Ziskin

Information icon Hello, Significa liberdade. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James W. Ziskin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft - Viveen Page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Viveen I cant find your name listed on the Talk Page as mentioned above - another editor mentioned you had deleted most of my page and left the 5 or 10% of my work available. Here is my rant directed at who I thought had done that. Apparantly some of this should be for your attention as previously the other editor kept interjecting.

I was in the middle of editing the page - I spent three hours yesterday and 2 hours the day before. I had NOT pressed the resubmit button. You have just deleted my work before it is finished. This is madness!!!! What a ridiculous system. Viveen as an artist has be marginalised by a male dominated industry and her work not given the credit it deserves - particularly with N-Trance where the record company and the band leader tried to erase her from history (as she left at the height of their fame and had to bring in people to mime on the videos - I can send you the contracts if you want). You seem to be assisting in the process of suppressing her right to be acknowledged. The Viveen page I am setting up is a page of FACTS not superlatives and all it needs is some time because we all haven't written 200 articles on Wikipedia and so its a learning process. Kindly simmer down, back off and try and have a bit of respect for what i am trying to do here. You even deleted around 12 of the references. Why? Why is the site Discogs so bad? Is it because it is a competitor? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discogs You even list it on your own site - so it cant be that bad. It is a major industry source of information. That's a FACT - its not opinion. So I'm assuming you have no knowledge of the music industry. One of those Discogs pages I referenced has 88 references to Viveens work - songs that she wrote or sung on. The missing tracks are the N-Trance ones because her work has been obscured as detailed above. So again - kindly put the page back to what it was like on my last edit and let me get on with it. I will then come back to you when I am ready to find out if all is good to go. Thank you.

Also you have clasiffied the Musicbrainz site as an unreliable source. You obviously don't know that the BBC and other media organisations use Musicbrainz for their source of images and information. These are some of the biggest organisations in the world. If it is good enough for them - why is it not good enough for yourself? Ref https://www.bbc.co.uk/music/brainz/ Rtm-2000 (talk) 07:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing: did a good job explaining the issues to you. Your rant here at Significa liberdade's Talk page suggests you only had cursory look at their explanations. You should take some time to familiarise yourself with the Wikipedia policies and guidelines DoubleGrazing referred to before repeating yourself. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Rtm-2000! As Robby.is.on stated, DoubleGrazing has explained these issues to you on your talk page. In short:
  • Wikipedia considers Discogs and Musicbrainz to be generally unreliable because they are user generated.
  • The material removed from Draft:Viveen has been deleted and cannot be retrieved because it is copyrighted, which is a legal issue.
  • Given that you have a conflict of interest, it is highly recommended that you do not continue editing her page.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:29, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft : House Of Hasib

Hi I have fixed the problems that you have highlighted in the draft can you please verify and let me know if something else should be improved Fuzayl1 (talk) 13:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Fuzayl1! Thank you for cleaning up the draft to remove copyrighted material. Someone from the Articles for Creation group will review the draft. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Significa_liberdade/Archive_4&oldid=1258225858"