Talk:Kawa model

Kawa model is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) at 17:22, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: Conceptual model in occupational therapy

Kawa model was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 17, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Health and fitness Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:17, November 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Kawa model is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

A fact from Kawa model appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Kawa model uses the metaphor of a river to help people contemplate their well-being?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kawa model.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 12:28, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Kawa model was the first occupational therapy framework developed outside the Western world? Source: https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1952
- ALT1: ... that the Kawa model uses the metaphor of a river to help people contemplate their well-being? Source: https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1952
- Reviewed:

Created by Significa liberdade (talk). Self-nominated at 15:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Kawa model; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Great hook (both of them). I prefer ALT1 but ALT0 equally works well for the DYK section. Article is within policy and new and long enough. ~~Just needs the QPQ to be done for this to be good to go.~~ Soulbust (talk) 06:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Soulbust, I only see evidence of two previous DYKs promoted to the main page prior to this nomination. Are you sure a QPQ is required? Were there any other issues? BlueMoonset (talk) 19:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BlueMoonset: You're right, I had seen that this was the nominator's 5th nomination and thought QPQ would come into play, but forgot that promotion is part of the criteria as well. In that case, this is ready for the DYK section. Soulbust (talk) 02:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 16:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kawa model/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Significa liberdade (talk · contribs) 01:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 06:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 06:31, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

the model draws upon the metaphor of a river to describe human occupation, which according to OTs refers to individuals' daily activities that make life meaningful.
and the model uses the metaphor of a river to represent a person's life flow or occupational journey.

Why are you repeating the same information? And if I may ask, which of these describe the concept of the Kawa model more accurately?

Mind linking river banks, rocks and driftwood in the lead.

The river represents the dynamic and ever-changing nature of life, while rocks, debris, and other elements in the river symbolize obstacles, challenges, and personal experiences.
In the model, "water (mizu) represents life flow and health, driftwood (ryuboku) represents personal assets and liabilities, rocks (iwa) represent life circumstances and problems, and the river walls (torimaki) represent physical and social environmental factors."

Again, you are repeating the same information. Wouldn't it be better for you to just combine the two?

Link occupational therapy at first occurrence.

These may include cultural norms, social expectations, family, and environmental conditions. These factors can support or hinder the person's occupational journey. Please don't start two consecutive sentences with "these".

However, in the best circumstances, => However, in the most ideal circumstances

It should flow down the river, but it may become stuck on a rock and become an impediment; however, it may also unearth rocks to make them less challenging. What do you mean it "should"?

When utilizing the Kawa model, OTs often begin by requesting their clients create a visual representation of their life using the river metaphor.[2][4] During and after the client's creation, the OT will ask "open-ended, clarifying questions, using a collaborative approach to ensure that the model provides an accurate representation of the client’s perceptions of his or her life."[2]: 17 The discussion should allow the OT and client "to explore life’s problems, to discuss support systems, and to brainstorm effective methods of problem resolution."[4]: 2 Importantly, the Kawa model is meant to be used as a flexible guide,[8] meaning "it can be used differently with each client, centering on the client’s perspective and narrative rather than a specific procedural agenda." In this paragraph, you heavily rely on quotes, which I don't quite understand. Please rephrase the quoted information in your own words.

In one study, Lape et al. used the Kawa model within a collaborative care team to facilitate communication about a patient's care needs. Using the model, the care team developed a "holistic picture of [the client] that showcased each health care professional’s unique perspective, which was interwoven with the perspectives of the rest of the team."[9]: 3 Participants in the study found that using the model "provided a common language for interprofessional collaboration" and could be effectively used within their profession. And this paragraph too.

I added a citation needed tag in "Strengths".

Importantly, clients are also actively involved in goal-setting, which both centers the clients' values and increases their motivation to participate in therapy. This is not neutral.

Both OTs and clients can find the conceptual framework difficult to understand. I don't see the use of this sentence.

Images

File:Kawa Model.jpg is properly licensed (CC0, own work)
Would you be able to add more pictures?

Broadness

this source (Kawa model on mental health, sports and physical performance: A mini review) may be of interest.
this source discusses how using the Kawa model could improve teachers' socio-economic health.
Other than the two items I've listed above, I found no further issues regarding broadness.

Sources

The source review will take place sometime next week. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 07:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will be failing this article due to the nominator's lack of cooperation. Feel free to re-nominate once the issues are addressed. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 16:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GAN wrong category?

Shouldn't this article be listed under Culture, sociology and psychology instead of Biology and medicine? Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 14:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]