User talk:Portillo
|
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!
Here are some tips to help you get started:
* If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself. * Read the article describing how to edit a page and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox. * When editing pages, use the preview button before submitting and try to fill in the summary box for every edit. * Eventually, read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines. * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page. * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
Jbetak 02:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes)
Please cite sources
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Daniel Cordone, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:10, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Some helpful tips
[edit]I noticed you editing a few pages on my watch list, and I hope you don't mind me offering some helpful advice. First of all, you should familiarize yourself with talk pages and Wikiquette. On talk pages, please post new comments at the very bottom, or better yet, hit the plus sign tab at the top of the page. This will create a new topic for you. Also, every time you post something on a talk page, you must 'sign' it by typing four tildes <nowikie>Andrew c 02:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)</nowiki>. As for the main article space, as stated above, when you add new content, you must supply a citation of a verifiable, reliable source. You may also want to review the original research and neutral point of view policy pages. Hope this helps. Happy editings!--Andrew c 02:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Panos.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Panos.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Total depravity
[edit]Your change to the page Total depravity was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Flex (talk|contribs) 14:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
May 2007
[edit]
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to 2000s. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mkdwtalk 01:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
"plz don't revert" isn't an adequate edit summary — it says nothing about what you did, nor about why you did it. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
See alsos becoming vandalism
[edit]Your periodic adding of mostly irrelevant links to articles such as total depravity and presuppositional apologetics (e.g., these) needs to stop. Its repetitive nature is becoming more and more like vandalism. If you have specific concerns for some of the links, please discuss them on the talk page for the article in question. --Flex (talk/contribs) 11:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
I came across your recent edit to the article and have reverted it. I feel that the statement regarding his chronic illness, etc. requires reliable and verifiable sources. If you feel that my revert was in error, please leave a message either on Ajcfreak|my talk page or on the article talk page. Thank you. Happy Wiki-ing!!! aJCfreak yAk 07:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Nu Metal
[edit]I agree, the only reason people don't like Nu Metal is because it's famous. I am just as much of a Metal head as anyone else listening to any other kind of Metal. Iamanadam 23:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Your use of article talk pages
[edit] Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. ([[1], [2]) MastCell Talk 04:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Planned Parenthood for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. -Severa (!!!) 10:55, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Edits
[edit]I reverted a couple of your edits, to Jackass (unknown cast member) and Manny Puig (unnecessary changes). Please ensure your contributions are improving the encyclopedia, otherwise your ability to edit may be retricted. Thanks, Deiz talk 07:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Block
[edit]Having reviewed your contributions and concerns raised by other editors I've blocked your account for 24hrs. I would advise you to be especially careful to make useful, constructive and appropriate edits after the block expires. Thanks, Deiz talk 11:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Deiz, I try my best not to disrupt articles only improve them and feel that for 99% of the time I havent disrupted. I accept your decision since you are a Wikipedia official. Portillo 02:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fair enough. The talk page edit noted above was certainly not constructive. Of course, not all editors are Shakespeare, Stephen Hawking or Mother Theresa, but in future, before you press save, ask yourself: is this edit truly going to improve the encyclopedia? Deiz talk 03:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Rap-Rock and The Clash
[edit]Citation needed? I assume you are not familiar with the discography of The Clash? As I noted in my summary of the edit, The Magnificent Seven is one of, if not the first appearance of rap-rock.Jlee562 (talk) 02:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
I was just surprised that it wasnt added earlier. Thanks for the message. Portillo (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
January 2008
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Heath Ledger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. {{{2}}} Will (talk) 21:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey what's up? I realised that you have editted Slipknot related articles before and I was wondering if you would be interested in joining the Slipknot Wikiproject. The project aims to develop all Slipknot articles to create reliable, high quality articles. If you would to join, simply list yourself i nthe participants list on the project page. REZTER TALK ø 11:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Insane Clown Posse stuff
[edit]The "Reception" headline you keep making is unneccesary. And the review that you are putting up doesn't belong there. The page isn't for reviews. That is why I'm removing it. Hope you understand. Juggalobrink (talk) 01:39, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah no worries Portillo (talk) 07:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Civility
[edit]Hi, While browsing through recent changes I came across an edit that you have made to the Son of God article. While what you have done in terms of reverting vandalism is appreciated, please consider revising your tone when filling out edit summaries. Using profanity violates WP:Civil and will not accomplish anything useful. Thanks! --Ubardak (talk) 07:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I understand. Sorry Portillo (talk) 08:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Slipknot AoF #3
[edit]The third AoF has been decided, Iowa (album) is the article chosen by default due to single nomination. You can see what this task is for and its aims here. As you are a member of the Slipknot WikiProject, your participation in this task is greatly welcomed and the quicker and better that we improve the article, the more efficient the project will become. Please head over the the talk page and identify areas for improvement on the to-do list and begin to achieve these goals. Collaboration is the key word for the AoF and collaborating with 1 or more users on certain tasks is recommended, communications can be made on the articles talk page or on user's talk pages. Nominations are now open for the fourth AoF so head over to the AoF talk page and nominate which article you think should recieve the attention next. REZTER TALK ø 22:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
May Slipknot Newsletter
[edit]
The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter Issue II - May 10, 2008 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department. | |
|
Don't forget that the Article of Focus department is up-and-running and having great success. The collaboration is currently in a "Voting Period". Please visit the talk page to nominate an article to receive the AoF attention. Since the projects inception in the early part of the year the project has grown tremendously and is currently thriving and offering great support to Slipknot related articles. Congratulations to all members and let's keep this up! |
Real Madrid criticism section
[edit]Hi, I was wondering why you removed the criticism section relating to Real Madrid's comments about their desire to sign Cristiano Ronaldo?
It seemed highly notable, related to not only Real Madrid, but the current European and English champions, Manchester United.
Normally, if one of my edits is removed, it is easy to understand why, by reading the edit summaries, however you marked your edit that removed the information as a minor edit (removal of an entire section is hardly minor) and left no information in the summary.
Anyway, just a polite suggestion, perhaps if you want to removed correctly cited and notable information, it would be nice if you left an edit summary, or even better discussed it with the other involved editors beforehand.
I'm sure your edit was done with the best of intentions, it is just a little hard to understand your motives, without discussion/summary information.
see ya
Sennen goroshi (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your message. I think you should put that under Ramon Calderon's article. Portillo (talk) 01:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Good idea, however some of the comments were made by Bernd Schuster, and Manchester United have threatened to take action against Real Madrid, but against an individual.
Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:05, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Arise article
[edit]Greetings, I've noticed that you added a Q magazine review to the "Reception" section of the Arise (album) article. I wanted to know if had some extra information regarding this source, like: author of this review, it's title, the page it was in, # of the Q magazine it was featured, etc. And thank you for contribution. Musicaindustrial (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I got it from here http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=1019513. Thanks for the message. Portillo (talk) 23:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
June Slipknot Newsletter
[edit]|
The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter Issue III - June 20, 2008 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department. | |
|
The project will hold its first "Roll Call" over the next two weeks. All users who plan on actively contributing to the Project are encouraged to add your name to the designated section of the discussion page. Failing to add your name within two weeks will cause you to become an "Inactive member", barring you from voting in the Aof and recieving this newsletter. Remember, you can re-add your name at anytime, if you feel like becoming active again!
The band's first song from All Hope Is Gone is avalible to download (for FREE!) today. The first official single, "Psychosocial", will be avalible for digital download on July 1. All Hope Is Gone is expected to be released on August 26. |
July Slipknot Newsletter
[edit]
The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter
Issue IV - July 19, 2008 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department. | |
|
Probably the best month so far for the project. Two GAs, two more GANs, one FAC and one FLC. All albums and DVDs are now high quality albums, with the exception of All Hope Is Gone which is expected to become a GA shortly after release.
Slipknot have began their tour throughout the United States on the Mayhem festival. However, after breaking both heels from a 12 foot on-stage jump #0 will be performing the remainder of the tour in a wheelchair. The band will be featured in next week's issue of Kerrang!. There are nine different collectable covers (one with each member of the band) for only the third time in magazine history. Their first music video of All Hope Is Gone for the song "Psychosocial" premiered last night. |
August 2008
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Capybara. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 21:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
September Slipknot newsletter
[edit]|
The Slipknot WikiProject Newsletter Issue V - September 22, 2008 If you would like to help out with future newsletters, please contact the Outreach Department. | |
|
We apologize about forgetting to do a newsletter last month, but the last two months have been really good for the project. We got our first FA, another FL, a further three GAs, plus a FLC and FAC in process. All Hope Is Gone is currently the AoF with the intention of becoming a featured article, so help out were possible.
Slipknot are currently taking a break from touring due to Joey Jordison breaking his ankle, it is rumoured that they have been shooting a music video for their next single "Dead Memories", which will feature Corey Taylor in some kind of mud pit/grave. Slipknot will return to touring in October and will be touring Asia, Europe and Australia until December, reportedly returning for an arena tour of the US next year. |
October 2008
[edit] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Right Thurr, you will be blocked from editing. macy 18:00, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
November 2008
[edit] Please stop introducing jokes into articles, such as those you created at John Kosmina. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. Your edit summary, "leave kossie alone you will die. Not by me, by kossie". See WP:CIVIL. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I was actually getting rid of vandalism! Portillo (talk) 23:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Do you see anything in WP:CIVIL that says that you can ignore the rules when you're getting rid of vandalism? —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I thought it was pretty funny! ...And probably true ^_^ --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 15:41, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- It wasnt supposed to be a big deal really. The important thing for me was getting rid of the vandalism. Portillo (talk) 22:49, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've reverted your edit to bee bread because the reference you provided fails to meet our criteria for reliable sources. Sites that are primarily geared towards selling products or services are not acceptable as references for Wikipedia articles. If you should find a better source with that information, feel free to restore the content. Let me know if you have any questions. Mr. Darcy talk 19:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Missy Monroe
[edit]I'm assuming your additions were all cited from Luke Ford. Unfortunately, he is not a reliable source for wikipedia and all biographical information attributable to him is supposed to be removed. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
December 2008
[edit]As is the case with the other Mortal Kombat characters, Kano's nationality does not belong in the article introduction, so please stop adding it there. Thank you. sixtynine • spill it • 04:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Slipknot Project
[edit]Hey there, as a member of the Slipknot Project I would just like to message you and remind you about AoF, the projects collaboration scheme. Currently the project is focused on All Hope Is Gone and we are currently going through a Feature Article candidate process in the hope of getting it classified as a Featured article. I would also like to bring to your attention that any member of the Slipknot Project can nominate an article from the projects scope to receive the projects attention, please visit the AoF talk page to nominate an article which you feel the project should focus on next. REZTER TALK ø 11:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
New World Order conspiracy theory
[edit]I reversed your edits in the Christian theories centering on the End time section in the New World Order (conspiracy theory) article since you have justified why your wording is more accurate. As for your question about whether we should create a criticsm section, you seem not have noticed that the article currently has one. However, according to the Wikipedia:Criticism sections page:
| “ | Criticism sections can be found in many Wikipedia articles. While sometimes appropriate, this structure is not optimal, as relegating all criticisms to one section usually results in an unbalanced presentation. When present, such sections should be considered a temporary solution until the article is restructured to integrate criticism into each relevant section. It may then be desirable to have a "General criticisms" section near the end of the article, for those points which did not neatly fit anywhere else. | ” |
--Loremaster (talk) 00:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)'
I just felt that you were adding a criticism section only because it was a christian theory. I mean i really dont care what secular humanists think about christian apocolyptic theories. I originally wrote the first paragraph, so i felt like international demonic order sounded better and more accurate then theocratic whatever. I did however like the emperial cult thing. Portillo (talk) 02:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm trying to add criticism to all theories as quickly as I find them. The criticism of the Christian "End Time" theory mostly comes from Preterism rather than secular humanism. As for your expression "international demonic order", I've decided to replace it with "satanic world theocracy". Lastly, I removed the mention of David Allen Rivera's Final Warning: The History of the New World Order because of its lack of notability. However, we can cite it as a source for the first paragraph in the "End Time" theory section. --Loremaster (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Joker image
[edit]If an someone image is uses in an article about, the someone, then it is commonly OK for fair use in wikipedia: we have lots and lots of photos of celebrities in articles about these celebs and screenshots from movies about the movies. Anything else is not fair use. you cannot illostrate the article about clipper with screenshots from Pirates of the Caribbean. You are free to consult some admins about the issue. This is a well-established understanding. See eg. this edit. - 7-bubёn >t 01:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mushroomhead, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Arcanedude91 (talk) 21:36, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
3RR and Edit Warring
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bodybuilding. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Quartet 00:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Harry kewell edits
[edit]Hi, I have noticed that you changed the profile from football (soccer) to the ambigious "football" player. This issue has already been discussed and agreed on. Soccer players are to be referred to football (soccer) players. If you want to voice your ideas, please visit the Association football in Australia discussion page or the Australian national football team page. Please do not revert the page again or it will be concidered as vandalisim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.0.121 (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I disagree. Football is fooball not soccer. Portillo (talk) 22:23, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry but wikipedia is not made for your personal views on what it should be. It has been discussed and agreed on here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Australia_national_football_(soccer)_team#Football_is_more_than_one_game.2Fcode. This is definently your last warning not to continue vandalisim. I've noticed you have been banned several time before for chaning things to your "personal views". Any further edits and you will be reported. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.0.121 (talk) 00:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- 60.224.0.121, please assume good faith as people have done with you. Portillo and 60.224.0.121, I have asked that the discussion be continued here in order to gain a consensus from a relevant project. Camw (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
It is not my personal view only that football is football not soccer. Portillo (talk) 07:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Korn
[edit]I undid your contribution to musical style and influences as it constituted an opinion made on what would be considered a blog. Please refrain from adding opinions to articles. Thanks! (sorry it shows up as an IP address, I forgot I was not logged in)Nickstuckert (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Anderson Silva
[edit]Hi! While a section on Silva's fighting style would be good, the section you restored is no good as it is (see my edit summary). Feel free to rewrite it with proper sources etc. though. Cheers, --aktsu (t / c) 23:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
May 2009
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Korn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--F-22 Raptor IV 21:46, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Your edit of metal was also reverted. Portillo (talk) 22:23, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Korn, you will be blocked from editing. --F-22 Raptor IV 00:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
What part of umbrella term don't you understand?--F-22 Raptor IV 00:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Arent you the one that was editing "metal" into the introduction? Portillo (talk) 01:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes, better. I thought you might like to know - after all, your edit summary was interrogative, positive contributions to the article are thin on the ground, and you might welcome a positive response in return. Regards. Haploidavey (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Michael Jackson
[edit]Yes, I was the first to edit the page and break news of Michael Jackson's incident. I added these edits once I saw a news ticker: Edit 1 to describe that he had suffered cardiac arrest and then was rushed to the hospital, and then another minor edit to add the "current event" tag at the top of the page. conman33 (. . .talk) 03:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Congratulations friend. Portillo (talk) 03:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- We've discussed this in depth before here, and here with community involvement with specific examples seen here by Sony and here by CNN. In a nutshell, "recording artist" covers singing, songwriting, producing, "entertainer" covers choreographer, acting, performing, and "businessman" covers all other professional dealings, including his philanthropy and contractual agreements and ventures. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 07:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I missed it. Portillo (talk) 08:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
First sentence of MJ article
[edit]I saw your suggestions in the talk page of the article and in Ian's talk page. I like your idea very much. Would you be fine with the following version: "MJJ, dubbed the King of Pop, was an American musician and entertainer, widely regarded as one of the most commercially successful recording artists of all time"? As for citations, they are given in the last section, Legacy and influence, where he is cited as the greatest selling male solo act ever. We don't have to clutter the lead with citations so I think that should be good enough. Let me know what you think. Thank you.UberCryxic (talk) 18:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah im sure i can live with that. The other option is to simply leave it as it is "Michael Joseph Jackson (August 29, 1958 – June 25, 2009), dubbed the "King of Pop", was an American recording artist and entertainer." Portillo (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
No death grunts in nu-metal
[edit]Hello, you apparently linked "guttural screaming" to the death grunts article, however, the two aren't the same. I'm sure it wasn't a bad faith edit, but I undid it, anyway. Thanks, --Danteferno (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Please find a reliable source. Thanks, --Danteferno (talk) 21:58, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Fg
[edit]Can you help me geting family Guy to a GA/FA. --Pedro J. the rookie 01:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking, but im no good at getting articles to GA/FA. Portillo (talk) 06:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Hood 2 Hood: The Blockumentary
[edit]
I have nominated Hood 2 Hood: The Blockumentary, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hood 2 Hood: The Blockumentary. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Niteshift36 (talk) 08:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Chickens as pets
[edit]Just because it was (uncited) in the main article doesn't mean it's appropriate. The subject of "chickens as pets" isn't an encyclopedic article detailing how people keep pet chickens, but about the phenomenon of pet chickens, i.e. where and why chickens became pets. Any how to content describing how pet chickens are kept is almost entirely too general. The line between pet chickens and regular poultry keeping isn't clearly defined by the manner of keeping them, only in the attitude people have toward their chickens. Steven Walling 06:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
So how exactly do you plan to expand the article? I believe that the article is about pet chickens such as in an urban environment, not a farm or hatchery. I understand there may be a few how-to sentences, but theres really nothing wrong with writing what pet chickens eat or the fact that chickens need to have dust baths in order to keep parasites in check. Portillo (talk) 08:41, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- My point is that all chickens take dust baths and have the same dietary requirements. The content I removed is by-and-large not unique to keeping pet chickens. Steven Walling 20:14, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
Well its not mentioned anywhere else, so maybe it should be mentioned here. Plus, pet chickens are kept differently to hatcheries. Hatcheries have cages with only a tiny bit of food and water for each chicken, no grass, no dustbaths, etc. Portillo (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- General chicken information should go in the main chicken article. Also, your comment about hatcheries is totally incorrect. Not all farms and hatcheries are the same, and some are better or worse than others. Steven Walling 21:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Well you better get busy, because i checked the chicken article, and dont see anything about what chickens eat or how they are maintained when kept as pets. Portillo (talk) 09:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Derek ramsey
[edit]
The article Derek ramsey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails notability requirements. Nice for a userpage to mention, but nothing for the mainspace.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 11:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of StrongLifts
[edit]A tag has been placed on StrongLifts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Guy0307 (talk) 02:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of StrongLifts
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is StrongLifts. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StrongLifts. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Canvassing
[edit] Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StrongLifts. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. --Yankees76 (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Tripe
[edit]Blanking my user page to write your tripe perfectly demonstrates the ignorant arrogance of the "ex-premies". There is none so deaf as those who don't listen.Momento (talk) 09:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
I didnt write anything, i reverted. Portillo (talk) 09:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- What's this then? [3]Momento (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
I reverted that. 1 Portillo (talk) 00:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Let me get this clear. You're saying you didn't write "To Momento, Prem Rawat said in the early 1970's" etc.? You just inserted someone else's crap? Momento (talk) 02:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Heres what happened. I noticed that you were banned from editing an article so i checked your userpage. I wanted to revert it back to "this is momentos page" (it was blank at the time), but i accidently reverted that paragraph which i dont know what it meant or what it was about. Portillo (talk) 06:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- The truth at last. OK. According to the conditions of my ban we can have no further discussion about why I was banned and the circumstances around it. How's the weather? Momento (talk) 10:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
I had never seen a user get banned from 1 article :). Weathers fine. Portillo (talk) 10:40, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Summer body has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Dictionary-type definition of a non-notable neologism
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LadyofShalott 06:18, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
The article The Death of a Ghost Hunter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unremarkable film. Does not appear to have been reviewed in any reliable source.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bongomatic 07:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Admin userbox
[edit]Hi Portillo, I see that you have an "administrator willing to make difficult blocks" userbox. However, I can find no evidence that you are actually an administrator.[4] Would you please remove that userbox from your page - having it when you are not a sysop is rather deceptive. If I am somehow in error, and you really are an administrator, would you please direct me to the evidence thereof? Thank you, LadyofShalott 21:17, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing it! LadyofShalott 15:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Its ok. I didnt even know i was on the list, i just liked the userbox. Portillo (talk) 22:07, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Deviancy amplification spiral
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Deviancy amplification spiral. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deviancy amplification spiral. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of MMA Junkie
[edit]A tag has been placed on MMA Junkie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 12:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Slipknot Project Roll Call
[edit]In an attempt to breath life back in to the Project I am arranging a Roll Call and will begin making arrangement for group initiatives throughout the coming months. Just so the Project can keep an updated list of people who continue to contribute to the Project a Roll Call will happen from time to time. It is understood that over time, users may have lost interest in the Project or Wikipedia all together; if you have, it's no big deal. If you would like to keep contributing to the project please sign the list here. If you do not add your name to the list by January 16, you will become an "Inactive member", this will bar you from voting in the AoF, as well as receiving the monthly newsletter. Remember, if you ever want to join the project again, you are always welcome!!! REZTER TALK ø 01:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
The Arsenio Hall Show and tense
[edit]Regarding this edit you made to the The Arsenio Hall Show article, please read WP:TENSE and WP:MOSTV#Lead_paragraphs for the use of proper tense for all television show articles. Thank you. Pinkadelica♣ 02:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Gym junkie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable neologism
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. E Wing (talk) 09:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Street fighting
[edit]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Street fighting. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street fighting. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Leo zhang. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Moreira
[edit]A tag has been placed on Joe Moreira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. iBentalk/contribsIf you reply here, please place {{talkback}} on my page. 01:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Amarjeet Sada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BLP1E.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Kai Greene
[edit]You just reverted my addition to the entry on Kai Greene, arguing that a photo that does not show his face is not acceptable. May I ask you to cite a relevant Wikipedia policy on that matter? I added the photo to illustrate the fact that Greene is interested in showing his body in artistic contexts, in addition to appearing in bodybuilding contests. It seems to me that the photo is very appropriate in that regard. To address your concern, however, I will exchange the photo for another one that does show his face. Please let me know if you have any problems with that. (By the way, I only deleted your photo because it duplicates the one at the top of the article. I thought it would be more informative to add something different.) Thanks! GBataille (talk) 23:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Ok. I just wanted to clean up the article. The picture is fine. Portillo (talk) 23:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello. You may not be aware, but a blog is never a reliable source for a biography of a living person. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Portillo. Before you consider any further editing at the above, please make sure you read my response (on the article talk-page) to your recent restoration of material. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Groove metal
[edit]Hello Portilo. I'm just curious as to what is your opinion on the notability of the groove metal entry? There aren't many reliable sources discussing this term. RG (talk) 03:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Not sure about sources. But i consider groove metal to be post-thrash/90's metal. I do think its notable. Portillo (talk) 03:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- It's original research to say that these two terms are the same thing and neither of these term are really notable. If you think the topic's notable, then please provide some reliable sources to prove me wrong. RG (talk) 02:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I dont really care if the article is deleted or not. I already voted for a keep. My only concern is what will groove metal bands be classified as? Portillo (talk) 04:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- How many bands can you actually find reliably sourced with the term? RG (talk) 10:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Pantera and Machine Head. Portillo (talk) 11:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Nu metal
[edit]The revision you reverted to has a multitude of poorly-sourced and unsourced content, original research, and overt references to the band Korn, despite the fact that the article is not about that band, and changes the lead so that it appears as a genre, not as an umbrella term (which is cited). The current revision is based on actual sourced content. (Sugar Bear (talk) 01:07, 11 May 2010 (UTC))
Your version is ugly. Remove the unsourced content then. Portillo (talk) 01:38, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
I take offense to your edit summary on the groove metal article. "what a stupid thing to say", that's rude. Please stay calm and be pleasant with other editors. And the Machine Head info is irrevelant. Those two allmusic links don't even use the words "groove metal", it's just talking about Machine Head in general hence why it isn't needed. RG (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
The link between thrash and pantera is groove metal. Portillo (talk) 23:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Watch for bad-faith reversions
[edit]Like this one... if you have the time. Wiki libs (talk) 17:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Ill try. But the groove and nu metal articles have been turned to hell recently. Portillo (talk) 05:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:CesareBonventre1.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:CesareBonventre1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:CesarBonventre.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:CesarBonventre.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 09:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:250px-Harveyrosenberg.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:250px-Harveyrosenberg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 12:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Football Tragic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable neologism
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:CesarBonventre.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:CesarBonventre.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:30, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:CesareBonventre1.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:CesareBonventre1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
The article Ariel Helwani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fighter in a non-notable brand.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Minimac (talk) 07:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Portillo. I'm not sure why you reverted me here. One of the cited sources you restored is a dead link, and neither of the remaining two alleges that Michael Jackson constituted an example of so-called "Peter Pan syndrome": the Time piece does even mention "Peter Pan syndrome" and the ABC piece only mentions the so-called syndrome in connection with the characteristics of pedophiles; Jackson is not the subject of this passage. As none of the sources asserts that Jackson was an example of so-called "Peter Pan syndrome", the passage fails WP:V and I've removed it again. Cheers. -- Rrburke (talk) 01:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Its alrite. I dont care about that anymore. Portillo (talk) 07:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:250px-Harveyrosenberg.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:250px-Harveyrosenberg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Fourth Ward, New York
[edit]A tag has been placed on Fourth Ward, New York requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 18:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Seven Signs Of Christ's Return
[edit]A tag has been placed on Seven Signs Of Christ's Return, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Forty two 11:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
At 15911 edits, you are in a better position than I am in knowing that one should not de-PROD articles created by oneself.-- Forty two 11:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Alphonse D'Arco. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
[edit]Hello, you were mentioned on WP:ANI [5]. Regards,
--Frania W. (talk) 05:12, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for informing me. Portillo (talk) 08:08, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Wedbush Securities
[edit]You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Wedbush Securities requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. GoingBatty (talk) 04:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
The article MAX'S has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non notable company or product.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 08:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Bridal Plasty
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Bridal Plasty. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Bridalplasty. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Bridalplasty - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Brianhe (talk) 04:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Jerrad Tyson has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kudpung (talk) 10:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Juan Brujo
[edit]Juan Brujo does not seem to pass WP:MUSIC; as such, redirecting is the least destructive solution. Ironholds (talk) 04:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
biblical
[edit]Please see MOS:CAPS. It's biblical, not Biblical, although it is Quaranic. Dougweller (talk) 07:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Mahamadou Diarra
[edit]I have removed this content from the article again. Instead of stating these opinions as fact, you should use attribution -- write who has described him as a "midfield destroyer" and "one of the best holding midfielders in world football". Barret (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Why?
[edit]Why did you undo my revision on the Madame Blavatsky post?
On that page, what you guys are doing is making all that information sound as if it's totally 100% fact when it's not. Those are just claims. That's all they will ever be. You're also pushing off that information unto the people trying to make them buy into the subject of theology. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.13.66 (talk) 03:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
What you wrote was your opinion. Portillo (talk) 04:43, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
No, it's not. Madame Blavatsky claims all that stuff. But none of it can proven. It's not 100% fact. If so, prove to me what she said is true. PROVE IT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.13.66 (talk) 04:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
I just edited the article. "Please remember though, these are only claims" does not belong in an article unless its sourced. Portillo (talk) 05:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Ok, i'll find a source. Most definitely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.181.13.66 (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Apologies
[edit]Hi there PORTILLO, VASCO from Portugal here,
sorry for my edit summary at Idriss Carlos Kameni, a very poor choice of words from me, even though you must admit the first time you added that stuff about racism it was a bit odd (a loose sentence, no ref).
Now, you have reinstated it with a source, i will obviously not remove it, just improved the display of the sentence overall. That said, please accept my sincere apologies, keep up the good work. - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 04:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
No problem. Thank you. Portillo (talk) 04:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Critical response
[edit]Stop removing section headings "Critical response" which are in keeping with the guidelines. Please read WP:MOSFILM. You should discuss at WT:MOSFILM before making any further changes. -- Horkana (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Watch me care. Portillo (talk) 06:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your good faith edits to Born This Way (song). However, I have reverted them because single-retailer charts (such as iTunes Store) are not an accurate measure of sales and commercial performance. See WP:BADCHARTS for more. Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
May 2011
[edit]Please keep in mind to summaries your edits so other editors know what you're doing... Some content was removed during your last contribution to Abraham. Thanks ~ AdvertAdam talk 06:35, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Myuran Sukumaran
[edit]Hi there. I'm just doing some work on this profile and noticed an edit conflict. I've been working on each of the Bali Nine over the past few weeks and bringing up to consistent standards. Do you mind waiting until I finish? Thanks Jherschel (talk) 10:15, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
I dont really like that layout format. Portillo (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CesarBonventre.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:CesarBonventre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CesareBonventre1.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:CesareBonventre1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:CesareBonventre1.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CesareBonventre1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:CesarBonventre.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CesarBonventre.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Lady Gaga
[edit]I have reverted your addition to the article. You changed the name of a venue to something that does not exist. Its original research and against policy. Please keep it in mind the next time. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:54, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Real original research. 1 Portillo (talk) 09:40, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Gemini Lounge
[edit]Hey, just wanted to make note of why I blanked the page so as not to give the impression that I was intentionally vandalizing. The Gemini Lounge was a Mafia hangout used by the DeMeo crew and is linked that way in a number of articles (e.g., Richard Kuklinski). I thought it inappropriate that there should be a link to an unrelated place in Oregon which apparently doesn't even go by the same name. Better then to make an empty page until a new article for the Gemini Lounge (i.e. the mob hangout) has been created. But if you think differently that's totally cool. :-) Shoplifter (talk) 10:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
No problem. Portillo (talk) 23:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. bodnotbod (talk) 09:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Admin noticeboard thread
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 03:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- Not really worth checking :-) situation sorted. Agathoclea (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
No problem, thanks for letting me know. Portillo (talk) 10:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
[edit] New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Portillo! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
 The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:53, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bible series
[edit]
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Bible series, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, 
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Bible series
[edit]Hi Portillo, you recently removed a deletion tag from Bible series. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 03:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Re: Talk: Kris Humphries
[edit]A few days ago, you requested that some information about the Kim Kardashian debacle be put into the article Kris Humphries on the article's talk page after I called for an article update to reflect the most recent information as of that point. I reverted your request because it was not what I was looking for in terms of an article update. Thank you.
--76.6.32.32 (talk) 01:34, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Hebrew Reali School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Broich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bavarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Edt summaries please
[edit] You just made three edits to Isaac Newton without providing an edit summary: [6], [7], [8]. Accurate summaries help other contributors decide whether it is worthwhile for them to review an edit, and to understand the change should they choose to review it. So, please, use edit summaries with all your edits. Thank you. -
By the way, I notice that you almost never provide an edit summary. Please consider? Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 10:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
- I nearly mistook your edit of Talk:Stephenie Meyer for vandalism. In some cases, using an edit summary will avoid this kind of misunderstanding. Elizium23 (talk) 03:37, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Rankings and reception section
[edit]Re: this. Just thought I'll let you know that consensus is not to create an empty reception section for the ratings table. Instead, if a section does not exist, the table should be put right after the infobox, see documentation at {{Album ratings}}. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 12:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Edit summaries.
[edit]Please use edit summaries, without them it is nearly impossible to judge the spirit in which you are making changes. For example, your change to Paul the Apostle. How did the article benefit from your revision, and what purpose did you serve changing "Fourteen" to "14"? I reverted it for the sake of consistency, but according to WP:ORDINAL it really doesn't matter. Adding edit summaries makes things a bit easier on everyone and only take a minute to fill out, so please use them. Cheers, HMman (talk) 19:32, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Talk:History of persecutions by Christians
[edit]Hi. I believe you unintentionally blanked the discussion on Talk:History of persecutions by Christians while setting up a template. I have restored the discussion. If the template change is required, you will need to make that change again.--cregil (talk) 18:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Tony MacAlpine
[edit]Hi there, it would be helpful if you included a description of your changes in the edit summary. Some of them, such as your most recent one, leave me wondering "Well, why the change? What was wrong with it before?" In the end it helps other editors to see why something has been changed. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 12:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your message. I edited it because I didnt think each band needed its own heading. Portillo (talk) 06:46, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of 2012 in UFC events for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 in UFC events is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 in UFC events (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ScottMMA (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
This user is promoting vandalism WP:VAN and is actively pursuing the deletion of pages per WP:WITCHHUNT. He posted the following comment on MTking's talk page "Continue to ruin UFC coverage on Wikipedia. You are doing a great job." Add this to the repeated vandalism of other user's talk pages and I believe he meets the criteria for WP:BAN Mississippistfan (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
May 2012
[edit] Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Sodom and Gomorrah. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 11:43, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk pages
[edit]Hey, when you're leaving comments on talk page, please try to use indentation to help make it easier to follow the discussion. All you have to do is prefix each paragraph with a colon (or multiple). See the WP:INDENT article - it's got some good examples of the process and good ways to outdent when the indents get too deep! Ravensfire (talk) 01:29, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
New UFC 148 page in Hasteur's sandbox
[edit]I found out that Mtking, Hasteur, Beeblebrox, Scottywong, and several other users are the same person using multiple accounts. I'm having it looked into here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mtking
I'm not sure if I'm doing it right or if this is the right way to have this looked into.
This may get good. Gamezero05 (talk) 05:54, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your voting and the change of stance
[edit]Dear Portillo!
As I have noticed on this page, Deletion Sorting Page, all of your current votes, all Delete, has these comments:
- "Fails routine, fails coverage, fails notability, fails everything." - stated one time
- "Fails routine or something like that." - stated four times
- "Some editors dont like UFC and I think we should do what they say." - stated four times
I don't mind the votes, but I have noticed an sudden turn of your stance.
Taking a look at this page, Article Alert Archive, and taking a look at the discussions that followed, I found quotes like this: "Plenty of reliable sources for notability.", with a vote as Keep.
On May 5th, you voted Keep with this comment: "Per witch hunt and personal agenda.".
Same date, "Editors who know nothing about UFC or MMA are trying to ruin the coverage of UFC on Wikipedia." (Diaz vs Mille (2nd nomination), Keep Vote)
But also on the same date, Johnson vs McCall (2nd nomination), this time around you voted for Delete with the comment: "Mtking does not like UFC and I think we should all do what he or she says.", and as far as I can see, all subsequent votes from you has been Delete.
My concern to all this is NOT your voting OR your argument for voting, but that you are, dare I say it with great respect, that you are trolling. And if by any chance you do, could you please reconsider your stance? By "troll voting", you are not contributing to the on-going debate, rather the opposite, I'm afraid. Mazter00 (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I dont really see the point of voting or finding a consensus on the UFC article deletions anymore. If the editors dont get the outcome they desire, they delete or merge it anyway. Your right, I was probably being a trouble maker. Portillo (talk) 07:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Comment at 2012 in UFC talk page
[edit]As you were quite insistent on having the posters in the 2012 article (no offence intended, but I did see you posted the same [valid] question twice in 24 hours), I thought I should notify you that I have left a note about the request at the last questioning of it. In short, I agree, there should be no problem with a FUR for use in the article, but I think it should be restricted to events without articles, as the stand alone articles will have them. --kelapstick(bainuu) 08:50, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
UFC 2
[edit]I'm quite confused. You have been arguing for the longest time in favor of keeping MMA articles. You suddenly started doing your troll votes to AfD's. Now you've nominated UFC 2 for deletion. I want to ask you up front: do you honestly believe that UFC 2 does not meet the standards you listed at AfD, or are you disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point? Ishdarian 09:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
They are not up to standards. Some of these articles only have two sources. If were going to delete and merge UFC events into omnibus articles then we better start now before this gets dragged on for the rest of the year. Portillo (talk) 10:37, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is MMA AfD's. Thank you. Mtking (edits) 11:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
UFC deletion debates
[edit]Since nearly all of these hardly had any discussion on the actual notability of the subject (and since they were well overdue - clearly many admins are steering well clear of the subject, and I can hardly blame them), I have closed all of them (apart from a couple that were clear Keeps) as No Consensus. I would suggest these aren't nominated again until a clear consensus on the applicability of WP:NOT#NEWS, WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT as they relate to MMA events is gained, with the input of a wide range of the community. Black Kite (talk)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
| I, Loukinho, award you this barnstar for staying true to the original values of Wikipedia even when bombarded with dirsuptive naysaying, as in Talk:2012 in UFC events. Loukinho (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC) |
A recognition to your support of the true wikipedian values was long overdue. It is editors like you that prevent this website from being mauled by trust fund kids. Thank you for believing in knowledge and humanity, and for that, I recognize you. -- Loukinho (talk) 19:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC).
Wikipedia Help Survey
[edit]Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.
Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)
UFC AfDs
[edit]I noticed you have nominated many UFC articles for deletion, but have listed them separately. If you are using the same rationale across the articles for deletion, this is unnecessary. In future, please nominate multiple articles under a single AfD, as set out in the procedures here. - Mailer Diablo 10:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Henry Hill
[edit]At this diff you removed a cited quote without leaving an edit summary. Why was this removed? —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 10:07, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I have reverted all the massive changes on the Paris Hilton article. I hope you agree with me that all such massive changes has to go trough the talk page to reach consensus first. I am not comfortable with the previously heavy edited version as it seem to be unproductive and somewhat misleading in concerns of Hiltons actual career. And it read more like a gossip magazine then a Wikipedia article to be honest. Hope you see my point. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Edit summaries please
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Meteorite does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! - DVdm (talk) 10:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Brian Welch does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Please start explaining your edits or I will personally revert every last one of them. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:46, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Punctuation
[edit]Re adding punctuation to picture captions, as at St Mary's Cathedral, Sydney.
- A sentence requires a punctuation mark to finish it. A caption doesn't, unless the caption is a sentence.
- A sentence has a subject and a verb.
- Captions just name and describe.
- The main types of structure that you encounter on wikipedia that are not sentences and do not need verbs are titles, headings, picture captions and list items (as in dot-point items).
- So "Statue of Our Lady, help of Christians at St Mary's" should not have a full-stop.
- "This statue of Our Lady, help of Christians was a gift to the cathedral" should have a full stop.
Amandajm (talk) 03:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Sydney edit-a-thon invitation
[edit] |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:37, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)
The article The Simpsons: Access All Areas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for films.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of The Simpsons: Access All Areas for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Simpsons: Access All Areas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Simpsons: Access All Areas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Neelix (talk) 17:09, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:59, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
[edit]
Your recent editing history at Alessandro Del Piero shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Escape Orbit (Talk) 12:33, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Sydney edit-a-thon invitation
[edit] |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 15:18, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)
Howdy! I'm getting in contact with those members of WikiProject Skateboarding who seem to have been recently active on Wikipedia generally.
The project seems to have been fairly inactive over the last year or so and I was wondering if anyone in particular would have any interest in helping me "re-activate" it?
If you still have an interest in the Project and/or an interest in a bit of a Project-related editing drive, let me know.
Cheers, Stalwart111 01:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
MMA Event Notability
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:MMA#MMA_Event_Notability. Kevlar (talk) 19:09, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Seven Signs of Christ's Return for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seven Signs of Christ's Return is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Signs of Christ's Return until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 04:20, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Sydney meetup invitation: January 2013
[edit] |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:57, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)
Regarding Countach replicas
[edit]I am replying to your question about Countach replicas here, because I am not sure that the discussion will help to improve the article on the Countach.
In the United States, in order for a replica or a kit car to get around the safety and fuel economy requirements for new cars, it must need at least some assembly, probably including the installation of the engine. Unless I'm mistaken, these requirements vary from state to state. I'm also not sure what the requirement for emissions are; those are very likely to have gotten stricter in the past few years. Sincerely, SamBlob ([[User
Mick Foley
[edit]Hey Portillo (talk), the Foley family were living in a Florida condo when that episode of Wife Swap was filmed in 2011, but in Collette Foley's notes she talks about how her family was getting prepared to move back to New York state (the episode aired about a year ago); and they currently live in New York state. The ref that you added however does verify the ages of the Foley children, so the "citation needed" tag can be removed now. Evenrød (talk) 06:55, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. Thank you. Portillo (talk) 07:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Feel free to delete my comments on your talk page if you'd like. It's such a minor issue that's been resolved. Evenrød (talk) 08:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Please help
[edit]Dear Portillo, could you please check the talk page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robby_Robinson_(bodybuilder) and help to achieve fairness in materials put on article about Robby Robinson? I would like to hear your opinion if you also support that within a couple of days an article about a famous bodybuilding legend turned out into an article about a ... I do not even have words. All the previous contributions were deleted, not only those from me, and new ones are presented so misleading that people who know Mr Robinson and his life and achievements will never believe this is an article about him. Thak you. RRWM (talk) 00:48, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
The article Kayla Marie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails PORNBIO, all awards/noms scene-related, no reliably sourced biographical content
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:52, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Kayla Marie for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayla Marie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayla Marie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:54, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pharisees may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Drop Dead Fred may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Silveria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Light before hitting the stage, as seen in Korn's DVD release of Who Then Now on July 14, 2009.)
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Reporting a vandal
[edit]Hi, I'm reporting this user for vandalism: [9]. The user has a previous track record of vandalism and is still continuing to do so. Thanks, 86.60.136.32 (talk) 08:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bruce Straley
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bruce Straley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wizard of the Hood may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- http://www.allrovi.com/music/album/wizard-of-the-hood-mw0000040482 |title=''Wizard of the Hood'' > Overview |accessdate=2008-07-24 |publisher=[[Allrovi]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://secure.
- |[[Joseph Bruce|Violent J]]<br />[Mike Puwal
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Andrey Kashechkin photo?
[edit]Hi - I just edited Andrey Kashechkin to include an image in the infobox, and it's of him in Astana team colors, but is a six-year old image! There are, I think, five images of "Kash" in wikimedia commons we could draw on: the one Astana shot and then four Lampre pics. The Lampre ones are higher-resolution and one of them is quite well-composed imo, but of course Kash no ride for dem nomore! Can you help me on Kash's talk page discover consensus: should we use the old Astana image, or a nicer, newer Lampre image, even though he's not on Lampre anymore?
-
This is my preferred infobox image of Kash -
The only Astana-image of Kash I found in WMC, but old... -
This is another Lampre image of Kash -
Meh -
Head-up! (see 1814)
Let me know your thoughts! Grazie! Azx2 19:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Z40
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your contributions. I noticed that you've been copyediting part of the intro of Miguel Treviño Morales's article where it said "Widely regarded as a violent and dangerous criminal..." All of this information is cited on paragraph three of his Rank ascension. Maybe we can discuss what you think is better and find common ground. Thanks again, ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 06:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for your post. I have a bit of a problem with "widely regarded", it almost sounds like he is being praised. I would prefer something like, "a violent and dangerous criminal..." or even "considered to be a violent and dangerous criminal...". Portillo (talk) 10:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- In that case, I think it should be "considered a violent and dangerous criminal" because "a violent and dangerous criminal" is simply an assertion; he is regarded as violent and dangerous by the press and by the government, and that should be pretty clear. Thanks for your interest in the subject. Happy editing, ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 05:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Football/Soccer
[edit]Hi Portillo! I'm curious about the changes you are making - your comments from earlier in the year suggested you were in favour of changing from football (soccer) to soccer, but you seem to be going the other way. It is a contentious issue, and I can see a need for consistency, but it may be worth discussing which direction we should go in. - Bilby (talk) 02:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Would you be willing to take a break from these changes, and seeing if the community can arrive at an agreed single term? At the moment, "Australian footballer" seems confusing to readers, as it suggests "Australian football (Australian rules) player", rather than "Australian who plays football". I'm not sure if the best approach is to accept that some readers will be confused, reword to "Australian who plays football", or go with "Australian football (soccer) player" or some other variant. But it seems that the community will need to make a call at some point, even if only as a temporary fix. :) - Bilby (talk) 03:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- I'm in agreement with Bilby here, why are you making such large and controversial changes without discussion? If you continue, it could be viewed as disruptive and may lead to a block. GiantSnowman 10:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, and your changing of the target article from association football to football (soccer) definitely needs to stop. I don't know why you are replacing a direct link with a redirect? GiantSnowman 10:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
While many of us are in disagreement with the term soccer in Australia on widespread grounds, vandalism does not help promote the cause and may in the end be detrimental --Orestes1984 (talk) 06:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
ANI notice
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hack (talk) 13:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
This block is the result both of the ANI discussion and because of your response to it — as well as not participating in discussion, you continued with disruption. Nyttend (talk) 13:17, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've just unblocked you. It suddenly occurred to me to check the timestamps on your contributions, and with that I quickly noticed that you hadn't made any contributions since ten hours before the ANI thread was filed. No wonder that you didn't participate, since you weren't aware of it! I'm very sorry. Nyttend (talk) 13:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Reverting the changes
[edit]Hi. Based on the discussion at AN/I, I've had to revert your changes. I agree fully that the current state of affairs, where there is no consistency in naming, is not a good approach. I'm hoping that the community can reach a decision as to how to proceed. The problem is that a large-scale unilateral change was always going to be controversial, as I'm sure that you expected, especially when it favours one side of the debate over the other. By reverting the changes, I'm using the same attitude as the "wrong version" when protecting articles - I don't think the current state is the right one, but whatever wording we use is going to be an issue. Certainly, I'l like to encourage you to engage in debate at Talk:Soccer in Australia, but you should avoid large scale unilateral changes until some sort of consensus emerges. - Bilby (talk) 03:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Translation of an article
[edit]Could you help me to translate an article , please ? I need somebody to do it?
Articles to translate
[edit]- fr:Bernard Ansalem
- fr:Fédération royale néerlandaise des échecs (Royal Dutch Chess Federation)
- fr:Fédération de Norvège de tennis de table (Norwegian Table Tennis Federation)
Thanks. Bye bye. Terry Blaine (talk) 16:34, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Global account
[edit]Hi Portillo! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
creation–evolution controversy
[edit]An article you have edited List of participants in the creation–evolution controversy has been nominated for deletion. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_participants_in_the_creation%E2%80%93evolution_controversy FYI --Kaptinavenger (talk) 09:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Mr. Portillo again (we talked in the past, when I had an account - message from 30 January 2011 about Idriss Carlos Kameni), from Portugal,
Please don't accuse me of something I was not trying to do (condescending behaviour), I was not aiming for that nor did I intended to badmouth/belittle the subject. I think Mr. Corona's aim, as ALL players in an academy such as Real Madrid's, is to make it all the way to the first team. So, I was precisely stating the facts, perhaps the wording could have been a little better, in that aspect I will not be "holier than thou".
Now, for some compromise: please read the summary I left in the article, it contains a WP:FOOTY guideline that must be followed (due to constant promotions/relegations, intros would require constant updates if what you wrote was to be maintained).
Nothing else for the moment, happy editing/weekend --84.90.219.128 (talk) 01:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- And the "stop" with all-caps (not shouting, sometimes I write word in caps for emphatic purposes) was a bit too much and for that I apologize. It's just I have been reverting several users that don't follow the aforementioned guideline the last days. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 02:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
No reply? I don't think I was unpolite or akin, but sorry to bother you. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 22:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello. You were not unpolite at all I just don't use wikipedia as much anymore, so I dont always reply. Thank you for your message. Portillo (talk) 02:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Portillo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of a load of Brisbane/Queensland local football clubs for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether several articles about Brisbane local football clubs are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether they should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centenary Stormers FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Portillo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Muckville, USA listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Muckville, USA. Since you had some involvement with the Muckville, USA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thegreatluigi (talk) 18:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
List of YouTubers
[edit]There is another deletion discussion on List of YouTubers. If you would like to weigh in, you can do so by checking out the discussion here. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 05:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Portillo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Thanks for creating the article "Chickens as pets." TheWikiSearcher (talk) 00:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
David Ray Griffin
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:David Ray Griffin § Description and interests. Thank you. Roy McCoy (talk) 03:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello Portillo from fellow WikiProject Skateboarding member!
[edit]
|
A sick Harold Hunter wallride for you!
I'm Wil540 and I am a member of WikiProject_Skateboarding like you and I also run an independent digital history project focused on skateboarding called the Skateboarding Digital History Project. Unfortunately, the Rick McCrank article has been nominated for deletion. Please contribute if you feel opinionated on the nomination: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rick_McCrank_(2nd_nomination) --Wil540 art (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC) |
The article Realpower (energy drink) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NCORP: no significant coverage. An energy drink that Real Madrid got its name on in a marketing deal.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
House of Pain edit from 2009
[edit]https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=House_of_Pain_(album)&diff=next&oldid=270948103
Hi Portillo,
I wanted to re-use the reviews you added on the House of Pain (album), in 2009. See above.
However, the way you did the citation, I guess is ancient. I don't know if they are magazines you own in your collection, if so and easy to fetch could you make them in regular magazine citation with the name of the reviewer, barcode, and general information.
Only if you can. ThanksFilmman3000 (talk) 00:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Album review ratings
[edit]Hi... this is a long shot, because I know you don't edit much on here any more, and this is about edits you made almost 15 years ago. But in March 2008 you added ratings and review quotes from Alternative Press and Entertainment Weekly to Nick Drake's first two albums, Five Leaves Left and Bryter Layter. My question is, can you remember where you got hold of these from? I'd love to be able to add the reviewers' names and review titles to the citations, as they are coming up with errors now, but I don't know where to get hold of copies of these magazines now. Thanks. Richard3120 (talk) 21:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. It would of been from websites like cdnow.com that used to have a collection of reviews on the album page. Unfortunately these websites don't exist anymore. Portillo (talk) 00:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, right, that's a shame... I'll have to try and find a library with print copies. Thanks for the reply. Richard3120 (talk) 08:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
December 2023
[edit] Hello, I'm Zeng8r. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tim Tebow have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Zeng8r (talk) 15:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)