User talk:CNC33

Archives

Archive 01: 2005–2007
Archive 02: 2008

This is my current talk page. conman33 (. . .talk) 00:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Steelers

Hey thanks! I've been working on it for basically one year, but it makes it all worth it when they win. The Chiefs' article looks good too, I salute you for keeping at it the whole season even though they did so poorly, I don't know if I could've stuck it out. The 2009 Chiefs season article looks great already, I'll try to root for the Chiefs some next year (except the game against Pitt, lol) they certainly deserve better than two wins! black ngold29 03:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas City Chiefs

Congratulations and many, many, many thanks for moving the Chiefs into good article status! Great job! Americasroof (talk) 13:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. I've always thought sports franchises were one of the most difficult types of articles to get promoted; hopefully it can stay at such a good quality. Keep it up! black ngold29 20:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:The Get Up Kids

Hey man, thanks! I'm in your position, and I just wanted the quality of the page to reflect that of the band. I'm like you though. They've been my favorite band for years, and it's great to see guys from the hometown make it that big. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 07:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

I saw you added a lot of information to 2009 Kansas City Chiefs season. One of the references is missing its url. Could you please provide it?

<ref name="Petition">{{Cite web |url=? |title=Kansas City Chiefs Uniform Petition |author=Sports Radio 810 WHB |accessdate=2009-03-27}}</ref> Debresser (talk) 23:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing it. Debresser (talk) 11:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas City Chiefs

I understand maybe the too many headings thing, but not the individual seasons. After all, if your talking about a team that you beat, it's not referring to their whole franchise. --Levineps (talk) 04:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MJJ

Hi. Were you the first one to edit Michael Jacksons death/cardiac arrest? Portillo (talk) 01:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas City Brigade

I reverted your edits to Kansas City Brigade as you did not properly source that the team has folded. If you can find a reliable source on if the team has folded then source it. The team folding source is not gonna be found in the Arena Football League page and it is still disputed on rather the league has folded or not. Sawblade5 ⁽^{talk to me} ^| ^{my wiki life}⁾ 07:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:JerryAndBrentGrey.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JerryAndBrentGrey.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Clear (talk) 17:33, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chiefs–Colts rivalry

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chiefs–Colts rivalry. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chiefs–Colts rivalry. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:51, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chiefs Draft

Just a heads up, I updated your 2010 Chiefs Draft template with all the players selected. 70.166.236.54 (talk) 08:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The distance (boxing) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article The distance (boxing), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The distance (boxing) until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kansas City Royals MSHOF

Template:Kansas City Royals MSHOF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Muboshgu (talk) 01:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Kansas City Chiefs starting quarterbacks at FLRC

I have nominated List of Kansas City Chiefs starting quarterbacks for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Cheetah (talk) 09:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sublime10thAnniversaryDeluxe.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sublime10thAnniversaryDeluxe.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clapton Deluxe.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clapton Deluxe.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Heat (1995 film). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 19:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012 NBA Finals

I explain it already. That fact is trivia and should not be included simply because it is interesting. It is not relevant as it has nothing to do with the Finals, the teams or the games. Remember Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.—Chris!_c/t 17:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come to the First Topeka Meetup, January 15!

Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States (WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.

Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 20:24, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas City Penguins listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kansas City Penguins. Since you had some involvement with the Kansas City Penguins redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ravenswing 21:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming event at the WWI Museum in Kansas City

Hello! I would like to invite you to a Wikipedia editathon about WWI and Dissent on November 22 at the National World War I Museum in Kansas City. Join us for the U.S. branch of this international event as we write more social history from the era around WWI into Wikipedia! All editors are welcome, contributors to topics around WWI other than Dissent also encouraged! Food and drinks will be supplied by the WWI museum, Sadads (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dee Brown (American football)

The article Dee Brown (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 21:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:LivePhishHalloween.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:LivePhishHalloween.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:GreysAnatomyFacebook.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GreysAnatomyFacebook.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Green Bay Packers WikiProject

Hi Conman33! I just wanted to let you know that I have restarted the Green Bay Packers WikiProject. Come check out the page and if you are still interested, add yourself to the active member list! All of our articles have been assessed and there are a lot of new tools available to help us improve Green Bay Packers articles. Please feel free to post on the WikiProject's talk page or on my talk page if you have any questions! Thanks, « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Conman33. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kansas City Royals Manager Records

Template:Kansas City Royals Manager Records has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Conman33. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Conman33. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Conman33. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kanrocksas Music Festival

The article Kanrocksas Music Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable music festival that only actually occurred once

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grey Wanderer (talk) 19:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"NBA Horse Challenge" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect NBA Horse Challenge. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 5#NBA Horse Challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:37, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bare links

Please see WP:LINKROT and also WP:LDR for your edit on American Utopia. Thanks for your addition. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically a missing formatting tag.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Add closing italic markup after the closing font tag in your signature, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures or respond here. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! This fix is still needed. When you add your signature to a talk page, it introduces errors into Wikipedia. Here's how to fix it:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:

'''[[User:Conman33|''conman33]] ([[User talk:Conman33|. . .talk]])'''

Fixed signature:

'''[[User:Conman33|''conman33'']] ([[User talk:Conman33|. . .talk]])'''

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of NFL season templates

Hi there - I have nominated all of the NFL's team season templates, some of which you created, for deletion. You can find the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#NFL team season templates. Thanks, PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ben ❯❯❯ Talk 21:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Untitled Jordan Peele film" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Untitled Jordan Peele film and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 29#Untitled Jordan Peele film until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 2pou (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tube Tops 2000

I just realized that you created the above article, so my edit summary that you failed to notify the author was a bit silly. That said, you can tag your own article for deletion, but it's rather unusual, and it's the wrong tag. What's going on here?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In retrospect I don't think this article contributes much. It seems as though this group recorded just this song. Two cited sources at bottom of the page. It seems kinda dated. The Chiefs have moved on from this song, as well. Just my thought. I'm not as active on Wikipedia as I was years ago, and just thought maybe we'd be okay without this one. conman33 (. . .talk) 23:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kansas City Current, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lynn Williams. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Major League Football

Hi, I understand why you put the league article and related articles for deletion, but I don't think the reason apply in this case. The league had two "major" attempts to start (2016 & 2022) and in both cases had a strong football figures as part of those attempts and had a strong references. As of now, the league - which is a public traded company - still in existence and tries to "come back". Furthermore, the league managed to operate longer than most minor leagues - they had a full draft for the 2016 season and started the preseason for the 2022 season before cancelling both. In essence, what I'm saying is that the league has a place in football history and in turn - a place in Wikipedia. BabyBOY789 (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Wpscatter. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jay Johnston, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! WPscatter ^t/_c 23:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The citation was in the body of the article beforehand, and I was simply summarizing it. In order to avoid clutter in the introduction/lede, and/or the possibility of duplicating the same article, they are not tagged. Sorry if you thought that was wrong, but the citation was pre-existing and I was simply summarizing it in the introduction. There are dozens of articles on Wikipedia that do the same exact practice. Thanks! Take care. conman33 (. . .talk) 00:49, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pearl Jam Vs Vinyl.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pearl Jam Vs Vinyl.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:30, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
Update your signature to fix the error.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kansas City Union Station

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kansas City Union Station, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in NFL updates

Hi CNC33, I noticed that you have worked on the Never Miss a Super Bowl Club article. I proposed some updates for Jane Skinner's article related to her projects that highlight women's roles in the NFL. Would you mind taking a look? Thanks! Sadielousd (talk) 01:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw that and messaged for support. I hope that helps. CNC33 (. . .talk) 04:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#Proposed_new_standard

Hi @CNC33. The recent discussion about suggestion of change "Label" to "Distributor" or something at album release history table. Your comments would be appreciate. Regards. 183.171.122.36 (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Skinner Producer

Hi CNC33, I'm reaching out to you here as you may have missed my ping to further update Jane Skinner's article to reflect her more recent production work. Because of my COI, I'd appreciate your help as an impartial editor. Thank you very much! Sadielousd (talk) 12:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey CNC33, thanks so much for the changes you made to Jane Skinner's article! If you have a minute, I'd appreciate you letting me know if you think my suggestions are appropriate. I don't want to implement them without input from the community because of my COI. Thank you! Sadielousd (talk) 14:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Kansas City Chiefs

Kansas City Chiefs has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 18:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 12:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of auto racing films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferrari (film). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twisters (film) has an RfC

Twisters (film) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This RFC notice is being sent to all users who edited about or participated in a talk page discussion regarding the topic/nature of the discussion. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabetical

Why do you feel screen should be first because it is alphabetically first? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are dozens of Wikipedia articles listed as "____ on stage and screen" or "____ on screen on stage". We need to make this consistent. CNC33 (. . .talk) 04:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Has there been a discussion about which title to use? If no, that would be something that should happen before the mass moves. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Christopher Walken on stage and screen just popped up on my watchlist due to a previous RM. I reverted that move, along with a couple of others that I noticed. The usual formation is "stage and screen" and this seems to have been pretty consistent before these moves. There's no reason to change these to alphabetical order. They should be moved back unless there's consensus for a change. Station1 (talk) 06:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coming here to agree with the three others who posted on this topic: the normal use in general English is "stage and screen" (in the context of "Olivier was a star of stage and screen"). We don't organise language by alphabetical order except in a dictionary - or we would end up with "lies madness that way", and have a language closer to that spoken by Yoda. - SchroCat (talk) 06:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK if that is the case then all of these articles need to be consistent with each other. There are even some with "on stage, screen, radio, and television" or "on stage, screen, television, and radio" etc. They should all be titled similarly. Thanks. CNC33 (. . .talk) 20:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the coverage of the page. If the page cover the career history of someone on stage, screen, television and radio, the title should reflect that. - SchroCat (talk) 03:35, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, and that's fine. My point is there are some pages that list "screen", "stage", "radio" and "television all in different orders than others. I think if anything these pages should all be titled such as "List of _____ performances". CNC33 (. . .talk) 06:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No - they should be left alone. Those that have them in different orders are likely those which follow the chronology of the artist's career, I would guess. List of X performances is a crap format: not every appearance is a "performance", so it's misleading (there's a reason the current format was chosen in the first place). - SchroCat (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repairing your damage

Please see User:Nikkimaria's comments when repairing the damage you did to Noël Coward on stage and screen and other similar articles. It would be very helpful if you would consult fellow editors before going in with a sledgehammer. Tim riley talk 17:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hello,

Thank you for your contribution to presidential election. I think it will shape America and the world. Regarding the inforBox photo, I would like some feedback on when and how we can finialize the RfC. It started in April 2024, so it's been quite a while now, so I hope we can replace the photo. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 11:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]