User talk:Monty845/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Monty845. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films). Legobot (talk) 00:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2015
- Special report: An advance look at the WMF's fundraising survey
- In the media: Gamergate; a Wiki hoax; Kanye West
- Traffic report: Wikipedia: handing knowledge to the world, one prank at a time
- Featured content: Here they come, the couple plighted –
- Op-ed: Why the Core Contest matters
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:History of Scotland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:History of Scotland. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2015
- From the editor: A salute to Pine
- Featured content: A woman who loved kings
- Traffic report: It's not cricket
.
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation adopts open-access research policy
- Featured content: A carnival of animals, a river of dung, a wasteland of uncles, and some people with attitude
- Special report: Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year 2014
- Traffic report: Oddly familiar
- Recent research: Most important people; respiratory reliability; academic attitudes
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost, 1 April 2015
- In the media: Wiki-PR duo bulldoze a piñata store; Wifione arbitration case; French parliamentary plagiarism
- Featured content: Stop Press. Marie Celeste Mystery Solved. Crew Found Hiding In Wardrobe.
- Traffic report: All over the place
- Special report: Pictures of the Year 2015
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Medical disclaimer
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Medical disclaimer. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 April 2015
- In the media: Wiki-PR duo bulldoze a piñata store; Wifione arbitration case; French parliamentary plagiarism
- Featured content: Stop Press. Marie Celeste Mystery Solved. Crew Found Hiding In Wardrobe.
- Traffic report: All over the place
- Special report: Pictures of the Year 2015
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiBullying
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiBullying. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Request close
Template:Request close has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 23:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Category:Requests for Close
Category:Requests for Close, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 05:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of Panty & Stocking with Garterbelt episodes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Panty & Stocking with Garterbelt episodes. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
AFD close
Hi, I closed this [1] before it was deleted as it was a clear hoax and I knew some time today It would've been deleted and seeing as Admins forget to close AFDs I thought it was easier to close it rather than do it later where it no doubt would've been left open for quite some time,
Anyway just thought I'd explain :),
Thanks and Happy Editing, –Davey2010Talk 03:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 April 2015
- Traffic report: Resurrection week
- Featured content: Partisan arrangements, dodgy dollars, a mysterious union of strings, and a hole that became a monument
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Arbitration report: New Functionary appointments
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 08 April 2015
- Traffic report: Resurrection week
- Featured content: Partisan arrangements, dodgy dollars, a mysterious union of strings, and a hole that became a monument
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Arbitration report: New Functionary appointments
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 08 April 2015
- Traffic report: Resurrection week
- Featured content: Partisan arrangements, dodgy dollars, a mysterious union of strings, and a hole that became a monument
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Arbitration report: New Functionary appointments
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
I suggest that you use your admin discretion and cut off TPA for this editor. I don't see why vandal-only accounts should be allowed any kind of forum, and unblock requests can go through UTRS. This is not an otherwise productive editor who's had a bad spell, or someone we should be looking out for as a potential future contributor. BMK (talk) 22:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nevermind, it looks like Nakon took care of it. BMK (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm perhaps a bit lenient when it comes to admin actions, but the talk page revocation was a good call. Monty845 22:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Cheers for support. Go man go! Trout71 (talk) 02:33, 11 April 2015 (UTC) |
- While I appreciate the thanks, it got me looking to see where we had crossed paths, that is an... interesting place to make your second edit on your account... Monty845 02:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
You supported my view on the Community portal proposals page.Trout71 (talk) 02:54, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|
Hi! after your suggestion I have opened a new account Cosmic Emperor (talk) 17:46, 11 April 2015 (UTC) |
Please comment on Talk:Nazi gun control theory
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nazi gun control theory. Legobot (talk) 00:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion (drafts)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion (drafts). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 April 2015
- Traffic report: Furious domination
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thank you for cleaning up the history in my userspace. Here's a barnstar. That was the worst attack of vandalism I've experienced. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 22 April 2015
- In the media: UK political editing; hoaxes; net neutrality
- Featured content: Vanguard on guard
- Traffic report: A harvest of couch potatoes
- Gallery: The bitter end
Please comment on Talk:Siege of Kobanî
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Siege of Kobanî. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Hillary Rodham Clinton - Move Discussion
Hi,
This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.
Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of WiderNet Project
The article WiderNet Project has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable project. No independent refs in several years. Lots of passing mentions of the project in google but no in depth coverage independent of eGranary Digital Library.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2015
- Featured content: Another day, another dollar
- Traffic report: Bruce, Nessie, and genocide
- Recent research: Military history, cricket, and Australia targeted in Wikipedia articles' popularity vs. quality; how copyright damages economy
- Technology report: VisualEditor and MediaWiki updates
Please comment on Help talk:CS1 errors
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:CS1 errors. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello Monty845. Recently you put full protection on this article. I've reviewed the edit history since May 1 in some detail and I noticed two people reverting eight times or more. I'd propose that we lift the protection and would be willing to apply blocks to the two parties who have reverted the most. Both have previous block history. This is not to take away from anyone's good intentions, just that they shouldn't be able to fight endlessly on this kind of article. If they were temporarily out of the picture, those remaining might be able to compromise. What do you think? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 01:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
- My sense is that the problems between and with the parties (all three) runs deeper than just the edit warring, I posted an AN/I thread WP:AN/I#Privatization in Croatia seeking some input to find a solution, but it hasn't gotten much attention. As I mentioned there, I have no objection to the removal of protection if something else, such as the blocks you propose, is done to deal with the situation, so if you want to do that, feel free to remove the protection. Monty845 01:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources. Legobot (talk) 00:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
How much abuse?
How much abuse and foul language do I have to put up with, whilst administrators excuse and justify the other editors contact? Yet you criticise me for the most minor insult 'smart alec' AusLondonder (talk) 03:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- (Response I was going to make and AN/I before it was closed) This is the reason why trying to enforce civility is a bad idea. Different people have different standards for where they take offense. People get emotionally involved in a discussion, and say things that are intemperate, and then a big discussion blows up over it. When it turns out the person who makes the complaint does the same thing under certain circumstances, it just highlights why it its a bad idea to try to enforce it. We can argue about different levels of justification, and different levels of offensive language, but what it really comes down to, is that trying to fight moderate levels of incivility causes more harm than good. Until you are getting into WP:NPA territory, its better to just turn the other cheek.
- To be clear, I would not normally criticize you for saying that, or things considerably more uncivil. Its only in the context of saying it in the very thread you started to complain about the incivility of others that it has significance. Monty845 03:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| Your cooperation will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards! \\'arrior 786 (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 06 May 2015
- News and notes: "Inspire" grant-making campaign concludes, grantees announced
- Featured content: The amorous android and the horsebreeder; WikiCup round two concludes
- Special report: FDC candidates respond to key issues
- Traffic report: The grim ship reality
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
I see you restored the article (makes no sense to me). However, if you restore the article, please also restore Talk:Dean Roberts. Thanks. The Dissident Aggressor 20:28, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- @DissidentAggressor: Restored the talk page as requested. As for the article, it just didn't meet the criteria for speedy deletion, as the article does make clear he is important based on his membership in Thela. I became aware of it at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Speedy_deleting_old_pages and so went about the process of getting it restored. However Dean Roberts does not currently pass any of the notability criteria, the band isn't any better referenced, and there are issues (or a complete lack of) notability sourcing on the other members too. It would be perfectly reasonable to nominate at WP:AFD, though maybe give it a day or two to see if anyone at VPP can find a reference. Monty845 20:39, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protection of Chris Cuomo
Hi, your semi-protection expired the instant you posted it. Could you re-do and fix the expiration date? Thanks! :-) Softlavender (talk) 01:21, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Same with Santino Rice. Softlavender (talk) 01:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Are you sure, I've checked the logs for both, which appear in order, I've also logged out to check and it wont let me edit. Is it possibly a caching issue on your end that your not seeing the protection? Monty845 01:26, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oops, my bad. I read the date/time listed twice in the edit summary(ies) as being today's date listed twice. Please ignore all precious communications LOL. Softlavender (talk) 01:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- I can totally understand, the formatting of the protection info line messes with me from time to time as well. I'm not sure how we would fix it, but it just doesn't click for some reason. Monty845 01:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oops, my bad. I read the date/time listed twice in the edit summary(ies) as being today's date listed twice. Please ignore all precious communications LOL. Softlavender (talk) 01:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Monty, would you mind putting semi-protection back on Chris Cuomo again? Now that it's expired the IPs are back posting the Twitter nonsense BLP-vio stuff. If so, thanks. Softlavender (talk) 22:03, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
EXPLANATION
His sign says "no assholes zone" and he was claiming it doesn't. That's an obvious lie, hope this clears things up for you. Let me know if you have any other disingenuous questions.
But, you didn't really pose that question in good faith, did you? Nope. The answer was obvious, you were trying to score points rhetorically — to what end, one can only guess — and you didn't really need (or expect) an answer. Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_has_annoying_username) (talk) (contribs) 16:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that there was something I was missing. He was claiming it had asterisks in it, which it did. While that may be a distinction without a difference, it wasn't a lie. But again, AGF, I wanted to give you a chance in there was something more than that. Given the tone of your response here, you really may want to consider taking a day or two off Wikipedia, and reduce your stress a bit. Monty845 17:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah you're not wrong about the stress level, but, when coupled with endless indicia that "No Asshole Zone" is what is clearly intended, I hope you understand that your bullshit hair-splitting about the difference between "No Assholes Zone" and "N* Assholes Z***" can only contribute to the frustration of an editor who is honest and takes honesty seriously.
- Do you really think your comment was helpful, or was it just sophistry, and a pointless distraction? Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_has_annoying_username) (talk) (contribs) 17:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Its common that a conflict on Wikipedia can escalate when there is a potentially ambiguous statement, and editors make different assumptions, without asking for a clarification. Precision of language can sometimes help diffuse a situation, while it doesn't always work, sometimes it really does help. So, no, I wasn't trying to engage in sophistry. Hair splitting also isn't lying, and while hair splitting could sometimes be considered disruptive, calling it lying wasn't really a fair characterization, and if the hair splitting is all that was being disputed, wasn't really helpful to the discussion. Monty845 17:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I'll bite, what would be a fair characterization? "BMK's intention to use insulting profanity is beyond clear, but he has made an infinitesimal effort, just for show, to not-really-disguise his intentions, such that a poorly written piece of software might not recognize this text as insulting profanity"
- Would that cut it? Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_has_annoying_username) (talk) (contribs) 17:47, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- While its not the way I would characterize it (I suspect we have differing points of view on how objectionable it is), I think that would be a fair characterization. I may not agree with it, but it is one reasonable way to interpret it. Monty845 17:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Here's a much more reasonable way: the sign clearly and unquestionably is meant to say "No Assholes Zone", the asterisks provided are intended as nothing more than the barest fig leaf to which BMK can smugly point and claim it doesn't say "No Assholes Zone", feigning ignorance in the most shockingly dishonest way. And the message itself is unnecessarily insulting, unrelated to encyclopedia editing, and is really just a way for BMK to lash out pointlessly at people he doesn't like, or to pre-emptively communicate to people who intend to disagree with BMK that they are "assholes" and thus not welcome on the page — which point view is always confirmed by BMK's responses, which involve various flavors of insult or simply deleting the comments outright and tossing some sharp barbs into the edit summary and, with alarming frequency, proclaiming that various users are "banned" from his page (because BMK does not like engaging with people he disagrees with — prefers to snipe them at range). It couldn't come more squarely within WP:POLEMIC which is one of the reasons why I removed it in the first place. Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_has_annoying_username) (talk) (contribs) 18:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I thinks your case would be stronger if in the first comment he hadn't copied exactly what was there, but he did, and readers could judge for themselves. While I think the sign is distasteful, I'm not sure it rises to the level of WP:POLEMIC, as its not targeted at a specific editor or group. Unless he makes reference to the sign when talking to someone, its sort of a situation where a person would need to self identify as the asshole the sign is referring to. As for an editor banning people from their talk page, I think its becoming much more common to see, and its a worrying trend. If done at all, it should be a last resort before being justified in asking for an interaction ban, not something an editor regularly invokes. But the community has thus far chosen to give a fair deal of respect to it when an editor requests someone stay off their talk page. I'm not really sure what to tell you on that one. There is perhaps some room for improvement on the policies here, but I think he is currently within the borders of what consensus (or at least lack of consensus to do anything about it) will tolerate. Monty845 18:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Meh. <-- My pet sheep here is troubled by the response, but I suppose we should leave it at that. I'm pretty sure I've seen BMK gesture towards the sign or one of the other offensive signs as a specific reference to another editor (in particular I've noticed he makes very small edits that shift the asterisks into different spots that yield a zero-byte edit summary and thus make it hard to spot) but I don't feel like digging thru edit histories further
- I'm going to go outside, thanks for the talk. Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_has_annoying_username) (talk) (contribs) 18:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I thinks your case would be stronger if in the first comment he hadn't copied exactly what was there, but he did, and readers could judge for themselves. While I think the sign is distasteful, I'm not sure it rises to the level of WP:POLEMIC, as its not targeted at a specific editor or group. Unless he makes reference to the sign when talking to someone, its sort of a situation where a person would need to self identify as the asshole the sign is referring to. As for an editor banning people from their talk page, I think its becoming much more common to see, and its a worrying trend. If done at all, it should be a last resort before being justified in asking for an interaction ban, not something an editor regularly invokes. But the community has thus far chosen to give a fair deal of respect to it when an editor requests someone stay off their talk page. I'm not really sure what to tell you on that one. There is perhaps some room for improvement on the policies here, but I think he is currently within the borders of what consensus (or at least lack of consensus to do anything about it) will tolerate. Monty845 18:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Here's a much more reasonable way: the sign clearly and unquestionably is meant to say "No Assholes Zone", the asterisks provided are intended as nothing more than the barest fig leaf to which BMK can smugly point and claim it doesn't say "No Assholes Zone", feigning ignorance in the most shockingly dishonest way. And the message itself is unnecessarily insulting, unrelated to encyclopedia editing, and is really just a way for BMK to lash out pointlessly at people he doesn't like, or to pre-emptively communicate to people who intend to disagree with BMK that they are "assholes" and thus not welcome on the page — which point view is always confirmed by BMK's responses, which involve various flavors of insult or simply deleting the comments outright and tossing some sharp barbs into the edit summary and, with alarming frequency, proclaiming that various users are "banned" from his page (because BMK does not like engaging with people he disagrees with — prefers to snipe them at range). It couldn't come more squarely within WP:POLEMIC which is one of the reasons why I removed it in the first place. Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_has_annoying_username) (talk) (contribs) 18:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- While its not the way I would characterize it (I suspect we have differing points of view on how objectionable it is), I think that would be a fair characterization. I may not agree with it, but it is one reasonable way to interpret it. Monty845 17:53, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Its common that a conflict on Wikipedia can escalate when there is a potentially ambiguous statement, and editors make different assumptions, without asking for a clarification. Precision of language can sometimes help diffuse a situation, while it doesn't always work, sometimes it really does help. So, no, I wasn't trying to engage in sophistry. Hair splitting also isn't lying, and while hair splitting could sometimes be considered disruptive, calling it lying wasn't really a fair characterization, and if the hair splitting is all that was being disputed, wasn't really helpful to the discussion. Monty845 17:44, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
So I've finally figured out what was going on here. Factchecker_atyourservice is quite proud of his use of the English language, and may even fancy himself a bit of a writer, but, in fact, he utilizes it very poorly. He kept saying "It says 'No Assholes Zone'" and my comeback was no, of course it doesn't say that - because it doesn't. What Factchecker_atyourservice actually thought he was conveying was "It means 'No Assholes Zone'" (or "No Asshole Zone", I won't quibble about singlar or plural at this late moment) and of course it means that, any idiot can see that. Less precisely, but more expressively, it means "I don't want any assholes darkening my day by posting on this talk page", but it doesn't say that. Factchecker_atyourservice had best get his ducks in a row and understand the words he's using before he runs around Wikipedia accusing other editors of lying, and lying about the lying. BMK (talk) 20:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- It's also interesting to note that Fatchchecher_atyourservice is monitoring my talk page so closely that he notices that I "[make] very small edits that shift the asterisks into different spots that yield a zero-byte edit summary and thus make it hard to spot..." It's one thing to monitor another editor's talk page as a "talk page stalker" who will jump in on discussions or offer assistance when necessary, but an editor who's paying such minute attention to another editor's talk page as Factchecker_atyourservice describes is hewing perilously close to WP:Harrassment. I would suggest that since I have banned him from my talk page, Factchecker_atyourservice's continued monitoring of it serves no useful purpose, and he would be best off taking it off his watchlist. His has never been on mine. BMK (talk) 20:49, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Personally, I think talk page stalking for reasons other than engaging in discussions or assisting almost always causes more trouble then its worth. Removing your talk page from his watchlist is sound advice. Monty845 21:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I could also point out the irony of the initial complaint centering around WP:POLEMIC use of talk pages, and what Factchecker has done with their userpage. Then again, much of this was ironic. Also, in response to your final sentence - is it actually possible to remove your talk page from someone's watchlist? Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
- Personally, I think talk page stalking for reasons other than engaging in discussions or assisting almost always causes more trouble then its worth. Removing your talk page from his watchlist is sound advice. Monty845 21:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
My dearest Kennington, how it pains me to see you presenting your childish antagonism and lack of integrity as cleverness. How ironic. Since you think yourself a wordsmith, I feel I must inform you that there is a word in modern English the kind of bullshit, bad-faith argumentation you've deployed above and at AN/I. That word is "sophistry". Anyway, to return to a point that seems to have gone way over your head—climbing skyward to the rarefied heights of abstract thought—the substantive difference between a profane insult and a not-really-veiled profane insult is essentially nil, you dull-witted toad. Best, Centrify (f / k / a Factchecker_has_annoying_username) (talk) (contribs) 23:18, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateurs Radio Algeriens
Hi Monty845: Just a note that it appears all of the articles listed in the "Full list of nominated articles" section of the afd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateurs Radio Algeriens are still tagged as nominated for deletion. North America1000 21:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. Monty845 02:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing the matter. North America1000 03:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 May 2015
- Foundation elections: Board candidates share their views with the Signpost
- Traffic report: Round Two
- In the media: Grant Shapps story continues
- Featured content: Four first-time featured article writers lead the way
LX National QSL Bureau
Hi Monty845: Concerning LX National QSL Bureau you blocked the wrong version containing vandalism by qsl.rlx.lu sabotaging qsl.lu. What's the use to block an article containing information what a subject isn't? Isn't Wikipedia a place to explain what a subject is? Super-gel (talk) 15:52, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- @Super-gel:It is not my place to judge what is the right or wrong version of the article. See WP:PREFER. You were involved in a protracted edit war, with little to no history of discussion, and the protection is to stop that, and hopefully result in discussion on the underlying issue. If the discussion does not resolve things, follow the Dispute Resolution Process. Again though, I don't know which of you is right and which is wrong. If the substance of the IP editor's content is true, than at least some note regarding it should be in the article. Its not a case of vandalism that is exempt from the restriction on edit warring. So, go try to have a discussion with the IP editor on the article talk page. I also asked for some independent input from the Wiki-Project on Amateur radio, who may be able to help form a consensus one way or the other. Monty845 16:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on MediaWiki talk:Tag-OneClickArchiver
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on MediaWiki talk:Tag-OneClickArchiver. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Help!!
Please help.... this user is continuing to vandalize.... --Zackmann08 (talk) 23:27, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:26, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Cite isbn
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Cite isbn. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 May 2015
- From the editor: Your voice is needed: strategic voting in the WMF election
- Traffic report: Inner Core
- News and notes: A dark side of comedy: the Wikipedia volunteers cleaning up behind John Oliver's fowl jokes
- Featured content: Puppets, fungi, and waterfalls
- In the media: Jimmy Wales accepts Dan David Prize
- WikiProject report: Cell-ebrating Molecular Biology
- Arbitration report: Editor conduct the subject of multiple cases
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy/Standards
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anthroponymy/Standards. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 May 2015
- News and notes: WMF releases quarterly reports, annual plans
- Discussion report: A relic from the past that needs to be updated
- Featured content: When music was confined to a ribbon of rust
- Recent research: Drug articles accurate and largely complete; women "slightly overrepresented"; talking like an admin
- Traffic report: Summer, summer, summertime
- Technology report: MediaWiki blows up printers
User:Hillbilly Dragon Farmer, High Frequency Trading and related vandalism
Thanks for blocking and reverting.
Some more related accounts: Dark liquidity (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Bamboozled malo en wikipedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Secretive 827-mile cable (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Algorithmic trader 007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Front Running Gringo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) PortugueseManofPeace (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (blocked sock: SPI Archive) and ultimately David Adam Kess (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (blocked: ANI Archive)
Seems like this is an old sockpuppeteer trying it again. I don't know if this should be given to a checkuser. --93.204.119.103 (talk) 22:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| Thank you, that debate has always been bugging me. Because of that debate, I always feared I would be known as a WikiBully who is WP:NOTTHERE Weegeerunner (talk) 01:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC) |
- @Weegeerunner: We all make mistakes; doing RC patrol, I once reverted and warned someone for signing a user space guest book without realizing it was a guest book intended for people to sign. Another admin, just today, accidentally deleted about 100 pages created by an innocent user because they misclicked and thought they were mass-deleting the pages of someone else. We just need to do the best we can, keep working to improve the encyclopedia, and hope our mistakes are never bad enough to earn spot at the Wikipedia:Village stocks. Monty845 02:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Those are words to live by. I wish there were more understanding people like you. Assume good faith is slowly crumbling away the way I see it. Weegeerunner (talk) 02:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Cyberbot is getting debugged but I need your help for a bit
I would like to debug Cyberbot and to effectively do it, I want to recreate the exact to see if I can see the bug surface. That means I would like to hog RfPP for an hour or two. Is it possible to template protect the page for that long and temporarily give my bot template editor rights?—cyberpowerChat:Limited Access 05:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Also see Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_page_protection#Serious.2C_undetectable_bug_in_Cyberbot and the request I left on the main page.—cyberpowerChat:Online 06:34, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 03:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Weegeerunner chat it up 03:34, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 June 2015
- News and notes: Three new community-elected trustees announced, incumbents out
- Discussion report: The deprecation of Persondata; RfA – A broken process; Complaints from users on Swedish Wikipedia
- Featured content: It's not over till the fat man sings
- Technology report: Things are getting SPDYier
- Special report: Towards "Health Information for All": Medical content on Wikipedia received 6.5 billion page views in 2013
- Traffic report: A rather ordinary week
Gender pronoun for Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry
As an FYI, regarding your use of "themselves" in your comment at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Sockpuppet investigation block/Proposed decision#Recall Election Procedure, User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry self-identifies on his user page with a presumably male name, "Richard". There is a series of templates such as {{them}} that can be used to automatically generate the user's preferred gender pronoun. So if you use {{them|Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry}}self, that will generate "himself" If you use that same template with my bot, who has not specified a gender, {{them|B-bot}}self, it will generate "themself". If you use it with an editor who has self-identified as female, e.g. {{them|Moonriddengirl}}self, it will generate "herself". --B (talk) 16:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Interesting. I'm generally a fan of using the 3rd person singular just to be safer, but that is a nifty template, I'll certainly consider using it. Monty845 16:45, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 June 2015
- News and notes: Chapter financial trends analyzed, news in brief
- Traffic report: Two households, both alike in dignity
- Featured content: Just the bear facts, ma'am
- Technology report: Wikimedia sites are going HTTPS only
Hi Monty845. Thank you for your attention on the article. Are you also going to deal with the socks? I smell a duck. I was about to make a report. Optakeover(Talk) 15:18, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've blocked both, so no need for an AIV report. If you want to do an SPI report, I've got no objection, though dunno if its worth it. Monty845 15:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Nope, I was thinking of SPI report, but yeah. Optakeover(Talk) 15:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Okie dokie lokie
|
The Admin's Barnstar | |
| For fixing the article and fixing the ducks so I didn't have to go to SPI. Great work. Now, back to work! Optakeover(Talk) 15:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC) (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Kenny Loggins vandal
Please see this ANI. I redid your /64 rangeblock since it appears to be the right thing to do, this time for two months. The guy started up again when the first month expired. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:59, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
ANI
I saw your comments: can you look into this.--Cosmic Emperor 06:37, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 June 2015
- Arbitration report: An election has consequences
- News and notes: Labs outage kills tools, self; news in brief
- Featured content: Great Dane hits 150
- Discussion report: A quick way of becoming an admin
- WikiProject report: Western Australia speaks – we are back
Please comment on Talk:New Mexican English
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:New Mexican English. Legobot (talk) 00:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 June 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost tagging initiative
- Featured content: One eye when begun, two when it's done
- Technology report: 2015 MediaWiki architecture focus and Multimedia roadmap announced
- News and notes: Board of Trustees propose bylaw amendments
- Arbitration report: Politics by other means: The American politics 2 arbitration
Your signature
Hello there! I'm working on a project trying to bring most of the coding on Wikipedia up to the most current standards (HTML5), and I noticed that your signature is using <font>...</font> tags which were deprecated in HTML 4.0 Transitional, marked as invalid in 4.0 Strict, and are not part of HTML5 at all. I'd love to help you update your signature to use newer code, and if you're interested, I suggest replacing:
[[User:Monty845|<span style="color:green;">Monty</span>]][[User talk:Monty845|<small><sub style="color:#A3BFBF;">845</sub></small>]]
with:
[[User:Monty845|<span style="color:Green;">Monty</span>]][[User talk:Monty845|<small><sub><span style="color:#A3BFBF;">845</span></sub></small>]]
which will result in a 145 character long signature with an appearance of: Monty845 compared to your existing 131 character long signature of: Monty845 — Either way. Happy editing! (t) Josve05a (c) 00:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Arbitration enforcement
By motion, the Arbitration Committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately:
- The case is to be opened forthwith and entitled "Arbitration enforcement";
- During the case, no user who has commented about this matter on the AN page, the AE page or the Case Requests page, may take or initiate administrative action involving any of the named parties in this case.
- Reports of alleged breaches of (2) are to be made only by email to the Arbitration Committee, via the main contact page.
You are receiving this message because you have commented about this matter on the AN page, the AE page or the Case Requests page
and are therefore restricted as specified in (2). For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement arbitration case opened
By motion, the committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately:
- The [Arbitration enforcement] case [request] is to be opened forthwith and entitled "Arbitration enforcement";
- During the case, no user who has commented about this matter on the AN page, the AE page or the Case Requests page, may take or initiate administrative action involving any of the named parties in this case.
- Reports of alleged breaches of (2) are to be made only by email to the Arbitration Committee, via the main contact page.
You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has, per the above, accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 13, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. Apologies for the potential duplicate message. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
AE question
Hi. I don't know if you remember me, but you were kind enough to provide direction to me during this unpleasantness. Since then, the editor continues to adhere to consensus, and now has reported me on (I think) 4 other noticeboards. I was simply going to ignore it, but it's getting a bit ridiculous. You had mentioned perhaps taking it to AE, but I went there, and I'm not sure it applies, since it asks for what sanctions I want HughD to be held to. Other than being blocked 4 or so times in the last 3 months, I don't think they've ever been sanctioned. One of his latest postings regarding me has been closed, much to his chagrin, but I think there are still a couple more open. Not sure what to do at this point. I'm not asking for you to get involved, but since you were kind enough the last time, I was hoping you could provide some direction. Not sure this constitutes harassment, but it sure looks like it. Onel5969 TT me 20:57, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Change from announced time table for the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case
You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the AN or AE discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list. The drafters of the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close 5 July 2015, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close 26 July 2015, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted 9 August 2015, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 July 2015
- News and notes: Training the Trainers; VP of Engineering leaves WMF
- In the media: EU freedom of panorama; Nehru outrage; BBC apology
- WikiProject report: Able to make a stand
- Featured content: Viva V.E.R.D.I.
- Traffic report: We're Baaaaack
- Technology report: Technical updates and improvements
Motion passed in AE arbitration case granting amnesty and rescinding previous temporary injunction
This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk User:Penwhale via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on this list and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case.
On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted:
- Paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Arbitration Committee's motion of 29 June 2015 about the injunction and reporting breaches of it are hereby rescinded.
- The Arbitration Committee hereby declares an amnesty covering:
- the original comment made by Eric Corbett on 25 June 2015 and any subsequent related comments made by him up until the enactment of this current motion; and
- the subsequent actions related to that comment taken by Black Kite, GorillaWarfare, Reaper Eternal, Kevin Gorman, GregJackP and RGloucester before this case was opened on 29 June 2015.
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Red link
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Red link. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 7 July 2015 (UTC)