User talk:Londo06
PROFILE · DISCUSSION · RECENT EDITS · RL ARTICLES CREATED · RL ARTICLES 2 · RL ARTICLES 3 · RL ARTICLES 4 · RU ARTICLES CREATED · RU ARTICLES 2 · TEMPLATES CREATED ·
| Please leave a . |
|
Archives
|
being BLOCKED is not the same as retiring
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Londo06! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 14 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 178 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Ashley Gibson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Brent Grose - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Mark Field (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ricky Bibey - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Josh Miller (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Tom Haberecht - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Ryan Boyle (rugby league) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Matty Blythe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Richard Eyres - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Asa Amone - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
More...
|
|---|
|
11. Beau Falloon 12. Andy Haigh 13. Joe Arundel 14. Jack Cuthbert |
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
GA reassessment of Melbourne Storm
[edit]I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Melbourne Storm/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Keiran Hyde
[edit]Can you explain to me what use this link here is in 6 to 8 weeks it will be obsolete, so why is it in the external links section? Mo ainm~Talk 17:17, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
WTF
[edit]I take it I was never meant to remain unblocked, as I am damn sure no-one else has used my internet connection.Londo06 20:03, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Harlequins RL
[edit]
Template:Harlequins RL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jameboy (talk) 09:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Wrong
[edit]I think this user has only one sockpuppet: lando09. His other socks don't appear to have similar names. Most sockpuppets I have seen have names similar to the origanal acount, suh as the case of Larry Jefferson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eteledcomputerapple (talk • contribs) 13:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:19, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010
[edit]
| |||
The article Stefan Hughes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No in-depth coverage available of this person. Fails WP:GNG
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 12:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Featherstone RUFC
[edit]Hi, I notice that you have made contributions to the Featherstone article. The current rugby league club, Featherstone Rovers, wasn't founded until 1902, and appears to have no links to the earlier rugby union (RU) club. However, I have contributed to an article about James "Jimmy" Metcalfe, and I have found details of him playing for Yorkshire (RU) in 1896/7 while playing at Featherstone (RU), would you have any information about the RU club of the 1800s in Featherstone. Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:London Skolars rugby league players
[edit]Category:London Skolars rugby league players, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 14:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
[edit]
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:00, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
[edit]
|
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Roger Best for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
[edit]
|
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:32, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Lucas Miller (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails WP:RLN as hasn't played first grade
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 08:25, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Template:Navbox RL squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. WOSlinker (talk) 19:49, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Military Historian of the Year
[edit]Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.
Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Southern
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Paul Southern requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JC · Xbox · Talk · Contributions 00:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Category:Harlequins Rugby League players
[edit]Category:Harlequins Rugby League players, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. J Mo 101 (talk) 19:03, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
The article Cy Lasscock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:RLN as he never played in the NRL.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 18:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Tevita Pangai
[edit]The article Tevita Pangai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable player who fails WP:RLN.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Tevita Pangai for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tevita Pangai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tevita Pangai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 14:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
List of St Helens RLFC players
[edit]Hi @Londo06: I looked at List of St Helens RLFC players and wandered what all the "Y"s and "N"s were. I see you're semi-retired but thought you might be able to tell me what they mean before I do some work on the article. Jodosma (talk) 11:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Harlequins Rugby League Reserves and Academy
[edit]The article Harlequins Rugby League Reserves and Academy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Long out of date page with questionable notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 22:43, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Australian rugby league biography, 1990s birth stubs has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:Australian rugby league biography, 1990s birth stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~ Rob13Talk 17:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
The article Daley Williams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
appears to fail WP:RLN and the GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 11:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Netani Suka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
appears to fail WP:RLN and GNG as did not play for Fiji in the RLWC
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 11:31, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Malakai Yalimaiwai Tuiloa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
appears to fail WP:RLN and GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattlore (talk) 11:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
The article Mike Baxter (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced and not notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Legacypac (talk) 17:45, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Londo06/Noq
[edit]
A tag has been placed on User:Londo06/Noq, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is an "attack page", (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 06:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
The article James Inglis (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 13:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Richard Lopag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Richard Lopag for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Lopag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
J Mo 101 (talk) 21:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
The article Ross Barbour (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:RLN. Article claims he played for Ireland, but there is no evidence of this on RL Project or RKC.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Lyndon Bateman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Frank Wagenstroom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I am not seeing any indication that this player meets either WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG; no significant coverage outside of stats and hiring announcements as would be expected of a popular sport.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Primefac (talk) 13:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Jonny Kennedy (rugby union) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable player, even by the somewhat more lax standards of the old WP:NSPORT (and definitely not by the new). Not seeing any significant coverage other than a few things about his vitamin company.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Ryan Prosser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable rugby player, does not appear to meet either WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG; only coverage other than stats pages are signing announcements.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
The article Dave Hull (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable player who fails WP:SPORTBASIC.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
The article Steve Jones (rugby union, born 1983) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable rugby player. He has a very common name but I cannot find any content about him other than generic match reports (his hat trick with Scotland A is only covered in summaries for example). Fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
The article Aaron Trinder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable rugby league player. Fails WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Tosh Masson for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tosh Masson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
UtherSRG (talk) 18:38, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Iain Grieve for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iain Grieve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
UtherSRG (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Iain Grieve
[edit] Hello, Londo06. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iain Grieve, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
The article Anthony Armour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. No significant coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Enrico Patrizio for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrico Patrizio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.