User talk:Londo06/Archive 38

Munster Squad templates

Hi there!

The Munster Squad has an existing template called 'Munster Rugby Squad' which pre-existed the 'Munster Squad' one that you created 9 months later. It has been kept up to date, unlike the one the subsequent one that you created. Can we let the 'Munster Squad' one follow the speedy deletion criteria?

Thanks!

Martinicus (talk) 09:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please stop with the unnecessary overlinking of content in Mark Wahlberg. We no longer need to wiki-link common terms such as 'United States' or 'USA'. Read Wikipedia:Only make links that are relevant to the context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Date autoformatting. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rod Griffin

I have nominated Rod Griffin, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Griffin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Skarebo (talk) 01:52, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked (again) for using socks to vote-stack

Per Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fronsdorf‎, I have blocked you for one month. Your block log indicates that you don't have many chances left. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for ban to extended indefinitely

I hereby request that the block currently in place be extended indefinitely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Londo06 (talk • contribs)

Why do it

I can confidently say I am one of the most open minded people, and that I can always see both sides of the argument. Every time over the last couple of years there has been a situation that I literally couldn't see how a position could be rationally justified I employed a sock-puppet, or created one (see the extensive list below). I did it because being a rational person and receptive to different approaches and opinions I have on numerous occasions, literally shouted at my screen "I literally cannot see where you are coming from on that one", or "I seriously don't understand how you can think that would be better". I am honestly a very likeable, open-minded person, and I see this as a defeat because I would rarely lose a verbal argument, and I see that as a failure on my part to bring people to the table. Giving up on diplomacy too early in the process and moving on to a campaign of dirty tricks.

A personal message to Jeff79; thankyou for raising the initial report, I see it as me breaking free of wikipedia. Whilst I cannot agree on your position on images, captioning and the aesthetics thereof, I leave you several pictures that you may be interested in at my counterpart commons account, hopefully this link works. [1]

History of sockpuppetry

I asked someone to vote on my behalf at work, creating the Wasps FC account and spoon feeding them what to say via email because I could not get my head around where they were coming from with regards to the removal of colours.
I have previously created an account CorleoneSerpicoMontana with no set agenda at the time, but became useful to me when the RL community became a largely Australian voice.
I acquired the Alexsanderson83 account after the fella left work, and it was reactivated on the RL community after it became clear that certain members would not include all English teams on an infobox, even were it to be shown to be in a lesser competition.
I created the Mortonstalker account to upload files. It was used in a vote to help speed up a move to disambiguate rugby union, rugby player, rugby (both players and teams), a situation that still wasn't resolved at my time of moving on. I am only one Morton stalker, there are two. I am only one but I can't remember which.
I created the Come on the Mothers account for little reason at all. I don't recall if it was used maliciously in any way.
I created the Noq account in an attempt to throw people off my scent.

That is the limit of my sockpuppetry and the last action I shall take here at wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Londo06 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems from that, or from my recieved implications, that you are leaving Wikipedia. If so, Thankyou for all your "constructive" edits over the years, and good luck. The Windler talk 20:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But see below. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:22, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of David Barnes (rugby union)

A tag has been placed on David Barnes (rugby union) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

Hello, Londo06. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Note:Keep in mind that Squadron members officially state they are not inclusionists. ~~~~

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adam Janowski

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adam Janowski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, only played one first grade game, (more may come but can be recreated), stub.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Windler talk 13:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retired?

Your retirement lasted for all of eight months until you resurfaced as Lando09 (talk · contribs · logs). — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]