User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 26
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:IntoThinAir. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | → | Archive 30 |
New Page Review - newsletter
- Breaking the back of the backlog
If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
- Second set of eyes
Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.
- Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote
With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .
Courtney Reed External Link
Hello! Thank you for you interest in the Courtney Reed article I created this morning. I read through the article you linked to Courtney Reed's Wikipedia page. I feel that the external link would be more applicable to the article for Aladdin the Musical, as it describes the musical specifically rather than just the actress. As always, I may have overlooked certain qualities of the article and it may very well fit into Courtney Reed's page. If this is so, please feel free to provide your own input. Thank you! (MonroeHarless (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC))
Your GA nomination of Center for Indoor Air Research
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Center for Indoor Air Research you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Center for Indoor Air Research
The article Center for Indoor Air Research you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Center for Indoor Air Research for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))
Nomination of Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter #2
- Please help reduce the New Page backlog
This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.
- Getting the tools we need
ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE
Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .
Retribution
Do you at all fear some form of retribution from Wikipedia's founder, for overturning and solidifying content that he had rejected? - Truth about MVNOs (talk) 13:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- No, because he rejected it for being unsourced. Now it's sourced. Everymorning (talk) 14:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Largoplazo. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Rajkamal Saraswati Vidya Mandir Ashoknagar, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 17:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Everymorning: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
That was fast!!! / Notable?
Wow, I see you added to my page on Mrs. Coverlet's Magicians less than 20 minutes after I created it!
Since you are a new-page patroller, let me ask: is the book sufficiently notable for Wikipedia? Everyone read it, but it does not seem to have won any book-awards or anything like that. HandsomeMrToad (talk) 19:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. I looked for reliable sources but I couldn't find very many. Check to see if it meets the WP:NBOOK criteria. Everymorning (talk) 19:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Půlnoc
Superbeat.cz only announces "the last Prague concert of the legendary Czech band Půlnoc" but the uploader seems to be trustworthy and I believe that it was really Půlnoc playing there, of course in a different line-up (Mejla is dead etc.) But the person sitting at the keyboard (right) is clearly Josef Janíček. Thanks for asking. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 18:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Jack Holmes (Illustrator)
Hi, I noticed you had marked it for deletion. Could we discuss how I can improve the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmarshall682 (talk • contribs) 22:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- I tagged it for deletion bc an article abt the same person seems to recently have been deleted after an AFD. Its nothing to do w article's quality. Everymorning (talk) 01:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:RFA study
You are invited to join the discussion at the bottom of Wikipedia talk:RFA study. Hi! Brought up a couple of potential improvements; it would be great if you could take a quick look. Enterprisey (talk!) 20:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Replied there. Everymorning (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Please add a new page?
Hi, Everymorning, I see that you're an experienced WP user/editor. I believe that my bio would merit inclusion as a notable person and I wanted you to look at it and, as a neutral third party, create the entry if you agree and if that's something you do. I've posted a draft of the entry on my User talk page (User_talk:Toxdoc411). I can email a formatted version, if you prefer. Thanks. Toxdoc411 (talk) 07:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, it seems like you're notable, being the editor-in-chief of a respected journal. To avoid conflicts of interest-related problems you could create it in the draft namespace yourself at Draft:Steven Seifert and then submit it through the articles for creation process. Everymorning (talk) 21:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm a WP newbie, as you can tell. I'll do that. Thanks. Toxdoc411 (talk) 05:50, 7 January 2017 (UTC) Actually, every time I go to the Article Wizard, and indicate that I'm writing about myself, I get a message that says that I cannot because of the potential conflict of interest. Here's what that page says:
"Unfortunately writing an article about yourself (or someone or something very close to you; see the related page on advertising) involves a conflict of interest. This presents a number of problems, not the smallest of which is that it is very hard to remain neutral. Pages that introduce a conflict of interest are not being accepted by the Article Wizard at this time.
We encourage you to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Autobiography. If the subject matter really merits an entry, then sooner or later someone will create one. Therefore we would encourage you not to create the article yourself. If you are determined to propose one, please find another Wikipedia editor to help write it...."
Which is why I selected you. I have created a formatted version as DRAFT:Steven A. Seifert Toxdoc411 (talk) 06:34, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. That works for me. I guess it needed editing after all ;-).Toxdoc411 (talk) 16:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
References
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Joseph Watson (January 16)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paul Joseph Watson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Paul Joseph Watson has a new comment
Not sure if you know
There's a massive problem with Chinese research, especially in topics related to SCAM. Edzard nailed it here: http://edzardernst.com/2014/05/and-this-is-why-we-might-as-well-forget-about-chinese-acupuncture-trials/ Guy (Help!) 21:00, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- I know. The authors are from Taiwan which is an independent country from China. Everymorning (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Heh! Opinions differ on that. Guy (Help!) 22:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
"420" collaboration
As a member of WikiProject Cannabis, you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming "420" collaboration, which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Wikipedia editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Hal Morgenstern: Notability?
Is Hal Morgenstern really notable enough to warrant a wikipedia page? Do you have some evidence of notability?
Best regards, KMeyer (talk) 18:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure he meets WP:PROF due to his very high h-index (>50 according to Google Scholar). Everymorning (talk) 03:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
That seems like a really low bar compared to notability requirements on the rest of Wikipedia. KMeyer (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose thats true in a way. But there are a few reliable sources in the article too. Everymorning (talk) 01:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Stella Chess
On 22 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stella Chess, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a study by child psychiatrist Stella Chess and her husband, Alexander Thomas, found that children could be divided into three different categories: "easy", "difficult", and "slow to warm up"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stella Chess. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Stella Chess), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 12:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
I replace your Speedy A7 with a BLP PROD. The claims of him being one of the early space tourists are a credible claim of notability in my opinion. The claims don't have to be sourced to avoid an A7, they just have to be credible. In this case, at least some of the claims are actually valid. See http://www.fox5vegas.com/story/17015067/flying-to-vegas-for-a-5000-flight?clienttype=printable for example.
Ah, I see someone has tagged it as a db-promo in the meantime, and mentioned that it has already been speedied earlier. Meters (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter No.2
- A HUGE backlog
We now have 803 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
- Second set of eyes
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
- Abuse
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
- this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
- this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
- This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.
Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hotcat FYI
I don't know if you know this but you don't have to click "ok" after every category on hot cat. you can keep adding them and click "save" to the left of the bar. --Jennica✿ / talk 08:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- No I didn't know that, thanks for letting me know. Everymorning (talk) 14:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Reference errors on 14 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Leonardo Michael page, your edit caused a URL error (help) and an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
- Still a MASSIVE backlog
We now have 803 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Adoption
I have been creating a page but I am stuck! I found you on the adoption page. If I can get this page up and running I have a couple of others to follow. Not sure what other information you need? Mbpippen (talk) 19:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Sorry about this edit[1]
I am on a very poor internet connection. Not sure how it happened. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the apology. I was confused about why you would revert me without saying why in the edit summary. I assumed it was b/c some of the sources I cited weren't secondary reviews so I tried to replace the primary ones w/reviews when I readded stuff regarding the gun-suicide link. Everymorning (talk) 18:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- When you are on a slow connection the buttons move around as the page slowly loads. If you hit a button just as it moves it can end up doing something you did not want. Always feel free to ping me if you do not understand an edit of mine. I do occasionally mess up.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:47, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Garrison has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Onel5969 TT me 01:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Precious three years!
 | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emily Temple-Wood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peoria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of James D. Wright
Hello! Your submission of James D. Wright at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, what did you just do to the template? If you like my ALT1a suggestion, please just say so underneath my post. You don't have to insert the hook again above. It's important to keep the chronological order of the thread so that prep promoters can follow the discussion. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I removed the duplicate of ALT1a I posted just below ALT1 under the incorrect impression that the hook(s) should be at the top of the page. Everymorning (talk) 22:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'm promoting it to prep now. Yoninah (talk) 22:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I removed the duplicate of ALT1a I posted just below ALT1 under the incorrect impression that the hook(s) should be at the top of the page. Everymorning (talk) 22:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for James D. Wright
On 27 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James D. Wright, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sociologist James D. Wright co-authored a 1983 study which showed that approximately 1% of privately-owned guns in the United States are used in crime? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James D. Wright. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, James D. Wright), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.