Jump to content

User talk:IntoThinAir/Archive 25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20←Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27→Archive 30

Nomination of Michael Anestis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Anestis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Anestis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, IntoThinAir. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/William Chambliss.
Message added 20:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America1000 20:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of William Chambliss

Hello! Your submission of William Chambliss at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Intelligentsium 22:18, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Boxer Wachler (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 18:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Everymorning, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 18:53, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK for William Chambliss

On 16 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Chambliss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that sociologist William Chambliss concluded that conflict between social classes is the fundamental force in capitalist societies? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Chambliss. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, William Chambliss), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:57, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Anne Shilcock

Hi, I am Kudoni. I see that you have removed all my additions to this page. I can assure you that all are correct: I wanted the page to do justice to a prominent player of the fifties. As someone new to editing I have not yet worked out how to do all the technical stuff, but all of the results can be found in the Blast from the Past tennis forum archive. This took me some time and I should be grateful if you could restore what I had made an informative page-before it was the very barest of bones. Kudoni (talk) 11:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Kudoni

Sure, I'll restore it, but you should add a source for the content you added. See Help:Referencing for beginners for more info on how to do this. Everymorning (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geoffrey Alpert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Justice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Help requested with pages for two senior scientists

Everymorning, may we request your attention to kindly look at these two pages, they are for two senior and bona fide scientists, your help will be appreciated.

Regards, Maxkrish

Qasim mehdi Kathleen Johnston — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxkrish (talk • contribs) 12:16, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Everymorning for your visit to the page and changes. Have made further changes, kindly take a look if it looks fit. Wish you nice day! Best regards Maxkrish

SWIFT banking hacks

Hello, I saw that you made significant contributions to the Sony Pictures Entertainment hack article, so I thought I'd reach out for help. I decided to be bold and start an new article on the clusters of attacks utilizing unauthorized access to SWIFT to send fund transfer messages to, well, rob banks. And the ongoing investigations into links to North Korea. It's just a start, please help! Chris vLS (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 1 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

The most expansive listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The most expansive. Since you had some involvement with the The most expansive redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Connecticut Painters

Thanks for adding Robert F Gault to the category Connecticut Painters for me. Do you know anything about the American Impressionism article? I found the talk page there very confusing. Kind of a newbie, here. Librarianhelen (talk) 11:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

  • I don't edit painting related articles here very often, and I only categorized the Gault article because I saw it on New Pages Patrol. For this reason, I don't really know anything about the American impressionism article. Everymorning (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Use The Talk Page

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Doc talk 06:35, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Adande Thorne age

I'm so sorry for any trouble I've caused. You asked for a little more proof of his age. He stated in a few live streams that his management at the start of his career told him to stay ageless so he would provide different ages for different interviews years ago so that's why that article has him at 1980. His youtube friend Lilly Singh (SuperWoman) has also stated that the two of them are around the same age and the famous birthdays website has his bday at 1988. I tried to post the link here but its not working but you can look for yourself

Hunter20100 (talk) 01:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC) Hunter

Garik Saribekyan

Hi,

Thanks for the review of my page "Garik Saribekyan" I have taken into account your advice, and now added references, and categories. SO it can be approved now. Please, check again if possible.

Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by K.atalyants (talk • contribs) 07:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Swoozie age

Sorry again. Don't mean to be a bother. Just saw your response. Well he deletes most of his live streams. He does check all of his business emails (located on his youtube page about section: Youtube.com/swoozie06) but its swooziemedia@gmail.com. He could probably be the best source because aside from his live streams, famous birthdays is the only proof I have. I'll stop updating it. I didn't know I was causing you extra work so I'm very sorry. If you have a regular email I could also reach out to him and have him email you from that email address if that helps.

Hunter20100 (talk) 04:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Hunter

Hi Some About My New Page Review

Hi User: Everymorning thanks for giving a suitable category to my newly created page Askmecodes, I would like to request you to have a review it again, because one of the user (User_talk:Harry_the_Dirty_Dog) put this page under Speedy deletion category. I don't understand why he did like so? I didn't put any content like promotional, I had just created my website before 2 months ago for that I want to build a brand strategy, My website will add more features in future so I will update the page time to time to make it more content reach. But for now, my site don't have too much feature so it has less content. Plz let me know If I did any violation of Wikipedia policy I will Improve the same.Saurav —Preceding undated comment added 11:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits, thank you

Hello there. I sent you an email in regards to a cite error that you may be able to help rectify.

I appreciate your time.

Kind regards.

Districtmemberboard (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Districtmemberboard

NPP / AfC

Hi. Just a reminder that in just over a week at Wikimania there's going to be a cross-Wiki discussion about the systems of control of new pages. This is a round-table rather than a presentation or a lecture. On the agenda are reforms to the new article reviewing systems and ways to help new users better understand our content policies. If you are going to Italy and would like to take part, please check out the conference schedule, and I look forward to seeing you there. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Path to citizenship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gallup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

MWH Page Edits

Hey, I'm Rhythmofyouth. When I edited the Men Without Hats page I added a nickname for Ivan. The nickname was never given to him (at least I have never heard of that happening). Anyway, I gave him a nickname because I am a fan of Men Without Hats. I was only trying to get the nickname out there. Maybe, he would like it. I wasn't trying to cause any trouble. So, no, I do not have a source because I thought of it on my own. I would like to add it in so that maybe he (and others) could see it. I know that it would be misguiding to those who are not familiar to the band, but maybe I could start it off. Thank you for your time. Rhythmofyouth (talk) 02:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2016 Calabasas fire

The article 2016 Calabasas fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not a notable fire. By convention only fires over 1,000 acres are included, or fires with notable structure loss or loss of life. This fire meets none of those.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blow Your Head: Diplo Presents Dubstep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

TPO question

Maybe you should repost this? It's tiresome watching Jimmy Wales hide from anything controversial that he's ever involved in. Tiresome because it's so frequent and predictable! - 208.54.90.142 (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Everymorning. Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Griffin Layne

Hi there.

You did some previous editing to the Griffin Layne page and I was wondering if you could please remove the maintenance tag for notability.

According to wikipedia guidelines, this page must adhere to the guidelines for musicians NOT biographies and it meets more than one guideline. The requirement is at least one. There are three.

Thanks very much. Districtmemberboard (talk) 23:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)districtmemberboard

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Supreme Genghis Khan has been nominated for discussion

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Supreme Genghis Khan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Feinoha Talk 18:02, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight

On 11 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wikipedian of the Year Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight has cited cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead as an influence on her writing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, IntoThinAir. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 23:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nicnote (talk) 23:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leland Sundries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roots music. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Morten Frisch

The article Morten Frisch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficiently notable per WP:PROF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexbrn (talk) 07:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Morten Frisch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morten Frisch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morten Frisch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexbrn (talk) 12:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2016 Calabasas fire

The article 2016 Calabasas fire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:WILDFIRE-GUIDE this fire is not notable enough to warrant its own article. Small local fire with no widespread coverage. Fires over 1,000 acres (4.0 km2) are notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Wildfire

Information icon

Hello! I have recently started a new WikiProject and am trying to recruit new members. The project, WikiProject Wildfire, focuses on articles that relate to wildfires. There is a lot of work that needs to be done. From updating templates, to classifying and improving articles. Any level of commitment is welcome! If you care to just add some input on the founding of the new project, awesome. If you would like to take an active role in editing articles, that is awesome as well! Knowledge of wildfires is NOT a prerequisite for joining the project. In fact, it would be great to have some members of the project who are NOT fire-buffs. That way we make sure that articles aren't just written by and for people in the fire community. If this is something you have any interest in, I would love to have you join the project! Please feel free to join the discussion or leave me a message on my talk page. (Note that you are receiving this message from me because I saw you made multiple edits on a wildfire related page. Not just spamming you at random.) Hope you have a great day! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:36, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For adding a page to a ideal list SamHolt6 (talk) 20:32, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donald Templer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Death anxiety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Augustine Kposowa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Paul's College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

more guns less crime

Hi, Is there anything else in this source that would qualify as opposition? [1]. non-significant appears to neither confirm or deny the theory. Darkstar1st (talk) 15:26, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

firearm-related homicide rates, not crime as a whole, rather a specific tiny minority of total crime. Darkstar1st (talk) 22:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Hummer, Illinois

Having read the talk page, I am prepared to AGF that this is not a hoax, but I have PRODded it s failing WP:N and WP:V, and will AfD if the PROD is removed. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Backlog

The NPP backlog now stands at 13,158 total unreviewed pages.

Just to recap:

  • 13 July 2016: 7,000
  • 1 August 2016: 9,000
  • 7 August 2016: 10,472
  • 16 August 2016: 11,500
  • 28 August 2016: 13,158

You naturally don't have to feel obliged, but if there's anything you can do it would be most appreciated. I've spent 40 hours on it this week but it's only a drop in the ocean.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposal: New Page Reviewer user right

A discussion is taking place to request that New Page Patrollers be suitably experienced for patrolling new pages. Your comments at New pages patrol/RfC for patroller right are welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bad Internet

The article Bad Internet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable enough. A web series with minimal coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi there Everymorning, I just had a note through from you that you felt our Eekeemoo page didn't meet the criteria to be included in Wikipedia. Is there anything that we can change to alter this decision? Many thanks ~~Goldborough Studio~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldborough studio (talk • contribs) 16:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

If you can find reliable independent sources about the character/comic and add them to the article thatd be great. Everymorning (talk) 16:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

New article improvement drives

Check out the following new article improvement drives/contests. North America1000 11:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Category policy

Could you point me to the guideline or policy that says that people shouldn't be in this category? Thank you! Cyberflag1 (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

  • I'll be honest, I wasn't basing my decision to remove Heilman from that cat on policy; I just looked in the cat and didn't see any other people in it. Aside from that, given that the article in question is a BLP we should be careful when adding it to controversial cats (which of course would include "Wikipedia controversies"). Finally, a person isn't really a controversy; now if there were an article about his dismissal from the Board of Trustees, you could definitely add that to the "Wikipedia controversies" cat. Best, Everymorning (talk) 17:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Adande Thorne's date of birth - (OkarPro)

Hello Everymorning,

If you have read the talk page on Adande's wikipedia page - there is in fact strong evidence that he was not born in 1987 as stated on his Myspace. However, almost all of this evidence is now unobtainable due to Swoozie deleting/privatizing these videos. When do you believe Adande was born? If you believe it to be 1980 - why do you think he lied on his MySpace account even though he had a very small audience at the time? Thanks for taking the time to reply! — Preceding unsigned comment added by OkarPro (talk • contribs) 22:44, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

  • Honestly, I don't know for sure (or at least sure enough to include his yob), but I think the evidence already on the talk page that he was born in 1980 is pretty compelling. IDK why he would have lied about his age to make himself seem younger. Everymorning (talk) 22:53, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philip Van Cleave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kankakee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

DS Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

QuackGuru (talk) 04:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to lede

The part "such" chemicals is a possible SYN violation. The part "among" other variables is possibly original research, the text does not summarise the body and if it were added to the body it would be in the wrong article. The text is possibly written too close to the source. The right article was the e-cig aerosol page. But that article is long gone. If the e-cig aerosol page is restored then the sentence can be added to that article. For now I rewrote the claim and added it to a sandbox. QuackGuru (talk) 14:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

I Had a Dream That You Were Mine

Thanks for adding a page for I Had a Dream That You Were Mine, I was planning on making one later today if no one had by then. Castelbuono (talk) 19:43, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the information.

Hi Everymorning: I am very new to the wiki process/system - but I will be happy to rollback any and all edits until such time as I found appropriate sources to amend the anemic, misleading and wrong entries on a page that currently exist regarding a band I founded. Thanks. Bobster wiki (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC) --Bobster_wiki

Nomination of List of vehicles simulated by iRacing.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of vehicles simulated by iRacing.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of vehicles simulated by iRacing.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Cham Calendar

No sweat sending that page to AfD. It improved the page in the end (I'm against using AfD to force page improvements, but you were in good faith and I'm happy). I added links from the Cham people and language articles to the calendar article, as before the calendar article was pretty much an orphan, which didn't help your being able to verify. Thanks for withdrawing in the end. Best, Smmurphy(Talk) 16:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

RfC for page patroller qualifications

Following up from the consensus reached here, the community will now establish the user right criteria. You may wish to participate in this discussion. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Association for genetic safety (NAGS)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on National Association for genetic safety (NAGS) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.oagb.ru/about.php?txt_id=724. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Jeffrey Fagan

On 8 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jeffrey Fagan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that research by Columbia Law School professor Jeffrey Fagan into stop-and-frisk in New York City was a major factor in Judge Shira Scheindlin's decision to rule the practice unconstitutional in 2013? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jeffrey Fagan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jeffrey Fagan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emily Temple-Wood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pat Quinn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Jazette

Hey, we were told to communicate with you on this page. A new page that we are in the process of creating has been flagged for deletion. All of the information proviied is relevant and acccurate. We have saved the page to continue editing at a later time. What can be done immediately to keep our page from being deleted where we would have to begin all over again?

Thanks

  • I'm not sure if this information is accurate. The article says, for example, that Jazette is J. Cole's wife, but in fact, his wife is Melissa Heholt. [2] If you want to keep the page from being deleted you should add reliable sources about her (I looked and couldn't find any). See WP:RS. Everymorning (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
  • Understood. We will add and update the reliable sources. Melissa Heholt is NOT in FACT his wife. All of the articles(blogs) that have "confirmed" that information have been based on hearsay and rumors. When he confirmed that he was IN FACT married, he did not, nor has her ever SPOKE her name because Jazette is IN FACT his actual wife. The media has ran with Melissa being his spouse because that is the story that has been fed to them while we (reps for Jazette) have respected Jazette's privacy and the privacy of her and Jermaine's actual relationship. We are attempting to create a Wiki page for Jazette to showcase her work as an Artist, Entrepreneur and Hair Stylist. If it makes it better, we will omit her Legal Marriage to Jermaine until we update the reliable sources you are looking for. However, it is asked that you do not delete the page as we are building it for her and possibly remove the flag from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JermaineJazette (talk • contribs) 15:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
    • You're going to need to stick to what can be verified in reliable sources. If her marriage to J. Cole isn't reported in such sources, for whatever reason, then it has to be excluded from the article. By the way, I can't delete the page (only administrators can do that).Everymorning (talk) 15:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
@JermaineJazette: Actually blogs are not considered reliable sources, especially as sources for a biography of a living person. If you could point out the sources you say are blogs, I'm sure they could be checked and removed if necessary. --Drm310 (talk) 23:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello

I've been told to go through the counter vandalism stuff, and I saw that you were on the list of people to adopt a user. Can you help me? Adotchar (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of David McDowall (criminologist)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article David McDowall (criminologist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of David McDowall (criminologist)

The article David McDowall (criminologist) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:David McDowall (criminologist) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 23:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

NYT story

Just saw your note on Jytdog's talk page and figured I'd respond here since they have their topic ban. University scientists actually responded to that pretty quickly debunking old claims and misrepresentations of sources. The kicker for those of us that actually teach agronomy, etc. is that the NYT piece is riddled with misunderstandings of basic concepts that get taught at the undergraduate level. Worth a read if it interests you. Kingofaces43 (talk) 02:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 15:46, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

WP people

I have been updating the the English-speaking entries in Category:Wikipedia people for the sake of uniformity. I added that cat to Florence Devouard. I also removed for a second time a female name from Template:Wikipedia. We shall see if that sticks this time. Oh, look at that. I modified the God-king's BLP a little and it stuck this time. Good.--Judtojud (talk) 00:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul G. King for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul G. King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul G. King until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 22:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

The Challenge Series

The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.

Merge proposal for Facebook and fake news

Hello ! Thank you for creating Facebook and fake news ! I'm glad we're both interested in the most concerning topic. I've made a proposal to merge it into the more comprehensive sourced article at Fake news website. I've opened up a section for discussion about that, at Talk:Fake_news_website#Merge_.22Facebook_and_fake_news.22_into_this_article. Sagecandor (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Everymorning. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer - RfC

Hi IntoThinAir. You are invited to comment at a further discussion on the implementation of this user right to patrol and review new pages that is taking place at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/RfC on patrolling without user right. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:IntoThinAir/Archive_25&oldid=1146541947"