Talk:Gynecologic cancer disparities in the United States

Medicine: Hematology-oncology / Reproductive Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women's Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mtran99.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

This article is very well-written, well-organized, and seems that it will be very comprehensive once the author fills in the sections/subsections she has created. I was particularly impressed by the comprehensiveness of the article, as the author does an excellent job of explaining the existing disparities in care (for each type of gynecologic cancer) and then goes on to explain the various factors that contribute to such disparities. The author can improve this article by providing a source for the last sentence in the introductory paragraph, as it is currently unsourced. Making this change will ensure that all of her statements are credible. The author can also improve this article by avoiding the passive voice and instead using the active voice in her statements. This will improve the overall readability of the article by making each statement easier to comprehend. The most important thing the author can do to improve the article is to provide a source for the last statement in the introductory paragraph. Making sure that no statements are left uncited is incredibly important, as it will help avoid accidental/unintentional plagiarism. Overall, excellent work and I look forward to reading your future additions!Sraman195 (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Two

I think you’ve done a really good job of laying out the different fronts on which gynecological cancers differ for different racial/social groups. I like the structure that facilitates this. Going forward, I think you need to look into things outside of the realm of each cancer. What are the economic effects? What is being done legislatively/medically? Secondly, as I said in my review – make sure to make everything medically clear and add some more images. Most importantly, I think you should expand your intro section to cover everything that’s in the main body and to see if there are any other sections that would be helpful for you to add. Akweaver32 (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]