User talk:CeeGee/ArchiveUpTo20171231

Three years ago ...
Turkey
	... you were recipient; no. 720 of Precious,; a prize of QAI!

My talk page archives:

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Suna Kıraç

A tag has been placed on Suna Kıraç requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7: although article asserts that its subject is a billionaire, net worth doesn't make somebody inherently noteworthy. Article fails to assert significance of its subject.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DrStrauss talk 16:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CumhuriyetLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CumhuriyetLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Refik Erduran

I've reviewed the above nomination and have a query. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Lake Meke page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 05:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Refik Erduran

On 13 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Refik Erduran, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that playwright and journalist Refik Erduran's fourth marriage, to his third wife's daughter from an earlier marriage, was annulled after six years by court decision for being immoral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Refik Erduran. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Refik Erduran), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower

Hello! Your submission of Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lake Meke

On 2 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lake Meke, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lake Meke (pictured), a crater lake beside a volcanic cone, is a natural monument and a Ramsar site in Turkey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lake Meke. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lake Meke), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo

Ich sehe, dass mein dein deutsches Konto auf de:Benutzer:CharlieGolf~dewiki verschoben hat. Korrekturen kann wohl de:Benutzer:Hexer machen. Ich habe de:Strafvollzugsanstalten Silivri angelegt und ein Foto von dir verwendet. Danke! -- Draffi (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower

On 7 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when completed in June 2017, Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower will replace most of the steel communications masts in the area, which cause visual pollution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palandöken Ski Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slalom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 16:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brian Dunford for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Dunford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Dunford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 07:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir

On 9 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir is currently the only operational underground natural gas storage facility in Turkey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aysun Aliyeva

A tag has been placed on Aysun Aliyeva, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex

A tag has been placed on Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Celestina007 (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex

A tag has been placed on Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 21:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Konak Tram

added a link pointing to Halkapınar

TCG Oruçreis (F-245)

added a link pointing to Ottoman

Trams in İzmir

added a link pointing to Halkapınar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done

DYK for MT GDF Suez Neptune

On 21 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article MT GDF Suez Neptune, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the MT GDF Suez Neptune, a floating production storage and offloading vessel, serves as Turkey's first floating liquified natural gas storage facility? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/MT GDF Suez Neptune. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, MT GDF Suez Neptune), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Kula Volcanic Geopark at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Beymelek Lagoon

added a link pointing to Trap

Seyyid Battal Gazi Complex

added a link pointing to Capture of Baghdad

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 12:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Kula Volcanic Geopark

Hi, I didn't forget about it, but I didn't have time to work on it. Will get to it shortly. Thanks for your patience. I re-posted it on the Approved page. Best, Yoninah (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Karşıyaka Tram

On 27 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karşıyaka Tram, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the newly-opened Karşıyaka Tram will be free of charge for its first 50 days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karşıyaka Tram. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karşıyaka Tram), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Mosque of Uşak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 10:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kula Volcanic Geopark

On 2 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kula Volcanic Geopark, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the volcanic area of Kula Geopark was mentioned by the Ancient Greek geographer Strabo in the encyclopedia Geographica as Katakekaumene, literally "Burnt Land"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kula Volcanic Geopark. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kula Volcanic Geopark), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Avcıkoru Nature Park

added a link pointing to Goldfinch

Hikmet Uluğbay

added a link pointing to Southern California University

Irmak Nature Park

added a link pointing to Goldfinch

Kirazlıbent Nature Park

added a link pointing to Goldfinch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 17:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex

On 10 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex hosts a museum that exhibits handmade meerschaum pipes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 04:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmet Ayik

Why did you write in 2007 that Ahmet Ayik was "the only wrestler Aleksandr Medved was unable to beat?" Please see Wrestling at the 1964 Summer Olympics, and 1966 World Wrestling Championships. Regards Tapered (talk) 07:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Afterword: just found out that they wrestled to a draw at the 64 Olympics. Sent an email to the international organization, requesting info from the 1966 World Championship. Couldn't find the info in their database. Will apprise you if I get info. Tapered (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is about the result at the 1965 World Wrestling Championshipsç Ayık defeated Medved and became world champion. Afterwards, Medved changed his weight class from "Light heavyweight 97 kg" to "Heavyweight +97 kg" forever. That is the claim. CeeGee 11:54, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check FILA 1966? They were in the same weight class--97Kg, which Medved won, with Ayik finishing second. Unless you can verify, it looks like WP:OR. I'm going to remove it. Feel free to contact the World Wrestling Federation to see if they have the records from the 1966 tournament. It's not available online in any other form/venue. My email to the organization wouldn't go through from the USA, and they're website access to old data is very badly done. Regards Tapered (talk) 02:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You miss the point. The article says "Ayık defeated Medved". This has been at the 1965 World Champs. CeeGee 08:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Değirmenburnu Nature Park

added a link pointing to Kabataş

İnönü Military Quarter and War Museum

added a link pointing to Military museum

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done CeeGee 07:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Riva Tüneli ve Çamlık Tüneli

Merhabalar CeeGee. Müsait b,r zamanınızda 2016'da açılışı yapılan Riva Tüneli ve Çamlık Tüneli'nin ingilizce sayfalarını oluşturabilir misiniz? Teşekkürler tüm emekleriniz için. --Lpxl (talk) 06:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, CeeGee. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 06:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ulubey Canyon Nature Park

On 25 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ulubey Canyon Nature Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the glass-floor observation deck of Ulubey Canyon Nature Park is 131 m (430 ft) above the canyon floor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ulubey Canyon Nature Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ulubey Canyon Nature Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, CeeGee. You have new messages at Template talk:Museums in İstanbul.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2017 deaflympic

hi , dear your table isnt correct. http://deaflympics2017.org/en/results - swimming : 7 + 7 + 7 + 6 + 7 + 7 =41 gold not 69 , thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsloverrr (talk • contribs) 07:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

also taekwondo 5+4+4 =13 gold . pomse 5 events , individual and team in men and women. pair only one gold. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsloverrr (talk • contribs) 07:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sportsloverrr: Thank you very much indeed for your attention and the correct values. I've fixed the errors. BTW, you are free to correct any error at WP by yourself. Cheers. CeeGee 08:30, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot dear, other correct :
bowling 12 gold http://deaflympics2017.org/en/sport/bowling-results/45 - two gold in all eventes , after team events all score add and give medals to athletes.
football two gold men and women.
cycling (Mountain Bike) is better than Mountain Bike in table. Cycling Mountain Bike (2) gold.
golf 2 gold medal men and women : http://deaflympics2017.org/en/sport/golf-results/48 http://deaflympics2017.org/en/calendar
Orienteering 9 gold medals : 2 + 1 + 2 + 2 +2 : http://deaflympics2017.org/en/sport/orienteering-results/53
table tennis 7 gold medals not 11.
badminton 6 gold : 1 mixed team + singles 2 + doubles 3 Sportsloverrr (talk) 10:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks again. CeeGee 12:44, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Summer Transplant Games

2017 Summer Transplant Games - thanks a lot , dear user can creat this page? i dont know, pls create it . i am complete it . i am create medal table of it :

http://wtgmalaga2017.com/en/the-games/medal-table/
http://wtgmalaga2017.com/en/schedule/
http://wtgmalaga2017.com/en/sports/
http://wtgmalaga2017.com/en/the-games/eventos/
i add medal table to 2015 this games : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Summer_Transplant_Games

Rank	Nation	Gold	Silver	Bronze	Total
1	Great Britain	166	90	104	360
2	United States	45	52	47	144
3	South Africa	35	23	18	76
4	Germany	30	30	22	82
5	Spain	29	15	14	58
6	Australia	27	28	18	73
7	Canada	19	15	21	55
8	France	19	11	27	57
9	Hungary	18	23	35	76
10	Argentina	17	23	24	64
11	Iran	17	18	14	49
12	Thailand	17	13	22	52
13	Ireland	12	7	9	28
14	Finland	10	15	11	36
15	Italy	9	10	14	33
16	New Zealand	9	6	5	20
17	Netherlands	8	14	17	39
18	Hong Kong	8	2	6	16
19	Switzerland	7	8	4	19
20	Poland	6	16	10	32
21	Greece	6	5	3	14
22	Japan	6	3	6	15
23	China	4	8	6	18
24	Brazil	3	5	1	9
25	Czech Republic	2	4	5	11
26	Austria	2	2	5	9
26	Mexico	2	2	5	9
29	Cyprus	2	2	1	5
29	Sweden	2	2	1	5
30	Tunisia	2	1	2	5
31	Norway	1	4	1	6
32	Portugal	1	3	2	6
33	Chile	1	1	4	6
34	Israel	1	1	2	4
35	India	1	0	1	2
36	Iceland	1	0	0	1
37	Kazakhstan	1	0	0	1
38	South Korea	1	0	0	1
39	Morocco	1	0	0	1
40	Paraguay	1	0	0	1
41	Singapore	0	4	6	10
42	Colombia	0	1	4	5
43	Belgium	0	1	3	4
44	Denmark	0	1	0	1
45	Puerto Rico	0	1	0	1
46	Slovakia	0	0	4	4
47	Romania	0	0	1	1
48	Uruguay	0	0	1	1
49	Algeria	0	0	0	0
50	Lebanon	0	0	0	0
51	Russia	0	0	0	0
52	Turkey	0	0	0	0
Total		549	470	508	1527

Done Please take over the article for further editing. 2nd place country in the medal list was corrected as USA. CeeGee 19:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tashakorlar

i am not turkish, but i know a few turkish language. chokh tashakor ediram. thanks.Sportsloverrr (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! We say in Türkish "çok teşekkür ederim!", (ç=tʃ, ş=ʃ, ü=y). Cheers. CeeGee 17:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Samsun Golf Course

On 24 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Samsun Golf Course, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Samsun Golf Course is thought to be the first course in the world to be built on ground recovered from the sea? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Samsun Golf Course. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Samsun Golf Course), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

IronGargoyle (talk) 12:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Batuhan Akay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Batuhan Akay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batuhan Akay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mahsum Akkuş for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahsum Akkuş is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahsum Akkuş until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taylan Anlar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taylan Anlar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylan Anlar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sera Doğramacı

The article Sera Doğramacı has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of İlksen Şermin Özdemir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article İlksen Şermin Özdemir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/İlksen Şermin Özdemir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sinem Yalçındağ for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sinem Yalçındağ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinem Yalçındağ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Çisel Ann Otts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Çisel Ann Otts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Çisel Ann Otts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yosemiter (talk) 20:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eray Atalı for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eray Atalı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eray Atalı until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ferhat Bakal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferhat Bakal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferhat Bakal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tolga Bozacı for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tolga Bozacı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolga Bozacı until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aslı Çukurkavaklı for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aslı Çukurkavaklı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aslı Çukurkavaklı until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cengiz Gök for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cengiz Gök is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cengiz Gök until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sera Doğramacı for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sera Doğramacı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sera Doğramacı until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fatih Faner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fatih Faner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatih Faner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Doruk Kamış

The article Doruk Kamış has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yavuz Karakoç

The article Yavuz Karakoç has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yusuf Kars

The article Yusuf Kars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Serkan Gümüş for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serkan Gümüş is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serkan Gümüş until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alec Koçoğlu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alec Koçoğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Koçoğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andy Koçoğlu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Koçoğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Koçoğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tanay Günay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanay Günay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanay Günay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kübra Dadaşoğlu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kübra Dadaşoğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kübra Dadaşoğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Betül Kahraman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betül Kahraman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betül Kahraman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yusuf Halil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yusuf Halil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusuf Halil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alper Solak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alper Solak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alper Solak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nil Eryılmaz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nil Eryılmaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nil Eryılmaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mine Güngör

The article Mine Güngör has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mine Güngör for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mine Güngör is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mine Güngör until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gökhun Öztürk

The article Gökhun Öztürk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emrah Savaş

The article Emrah Savaş has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Serdar Semiz

The article Serdar Semiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sefa Kavaz

The article Sefa Kavaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fatih Taygar

The article Fatih Taygar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CeeGee. You have new messages at Talk:Çifte Bridge.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Barış Coşkun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barış Coşkun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barış Coşkun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gürkan Çetinkaya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gürkan Çetinkaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gürkan Çetinkaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emre Faner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emre Faner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emre Faner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ceren Alkan

The article Ceren Alkan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sinem Doğu

The article Sinem Doğu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tuba Dokur

The article Tuba Dokur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yavuz Karakoç for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yavuz Karakoç is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yavuz Karakoç until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yosemiter (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ceren Alkan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ceren Alkan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceren Alkan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sinem Doğu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sinem Doğu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinem Doğu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tuba Dokur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuba Dokur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuba Dokur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tuğçe Melis Demir

The article Tuğçe Melis Demir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria Jasmina Decu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Jasmina Decu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Jasmina Decu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seda Demir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seda Demir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seda Demir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Çağla Baktıroğlu

The article Çağla Baktıroğlu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tuğçe Melis Demir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuğçe Melis Demir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuğçe Melis Demir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Huriye Yeliz Yüksel

The article Huriye Yeliz Yüksel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erol Kahraman

The article Erol Kahraman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tarık Göçmen

The article Tarık Göçmen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deniz İnce

The article Deniz İnce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Refika Yılmaz

The article Refika Yılmaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Betül Tayğar

The article Betül Tayğar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Burcu Turanal

The article Burcu Turanal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elif Ulaş

The article Elif Ulaş has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fulya Yurt

The article Fulya Yurt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fulya Yurt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fulya Yurt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulya Yurt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elif Ulaş for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elif Ulaş is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elif Ulaş until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Burcu Turanal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burcu Turanal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burcu Turanal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Betül Tayğar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betül Tayğar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betül Tayğar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Refika Yılmaz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Refika Yılmaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refika Yılmaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Huriye Yeliz Yüksel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huriye Yeliz Yüksel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huriye Yeliz Yüksel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Çağla Baktıroğlu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Çağla Baktıroğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Çağla Baktıroğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erol Kahraman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erol Kahraman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erol Kahraman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Enkaspor branches

Template:Enkaspor branches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Ömer Halisdemir, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:32, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Evin Demirhan

On 20 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evin Demirhan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as a high school student, Evin Demirhan supported her family of 13 by wrestling, and later became a bronze medalist in the 2017 World Wrestling Championships? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evin Demirhan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Evin Demirhan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ömer Halisdemir

On 26 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ömer Halisdemir, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sergeant Ömer Halisdemir was killed on the spot after he shot dead a general who had tried to take over the Special Forces Command HQ during the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ömer Halisdemir. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ömer Halisdemir), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ataturk Momuments

Do you know of any template in English like this "{{Atatürk anıtları}}" Turkish wikipedia template?--TheWaves (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I checked out the navbox tr:Şablon:Atatürk anıtları, and find it interesting. You can create it in English if you think it can be useful here also. CeeGee 08:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm working on in here: Template:Atatürk Monuments, also is there a say to dynamically show the contents of a category in a template list? --TheWaves (talk) 16:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what is a "category content shown dynamically"? However, as I can see everything is fine. I only added some other categories and sort keys. CeeGee 05:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thanks, What I mean with content shown dynamically is like when a new article is added to a category it automatically appears in that category. So is there something like that possible for templates like this? That the contents of a category show up in the list?--TheWaves (talk) 16:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş

Hello! Your submission of Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! starship.paint ~ KO 08:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the wait for the full review, which is done now. Thank you for your patience. There are a number of issues for you to settle. starship.paint ~ KO 09:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. Thank you very much indeed for your in-depth review. I'm gonna try to address the issues. CeeGee 09:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.11% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for October:

Women and disability Healthcare Geofocus: Nordic countries

Continuing from month to month:

#1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 10:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Thanks so much for your invitation. Yes, I am interested in creating articles about Turkish women. I don't know how the articles written by me are inserted into the WikiProject Women in Red. Is it eneogh to tag the talk page of the article with the WP Women in Red template or must I insert its wikilink into the list at the WP? An article about a Turkish sportswoman written by me, Evin Demirhan, appeared under DYK in September 2017. Is it worth to be included in the DYK list of the WP? Must I be a member of the WP to do a.m. tasks? Thanks. CeeGee 17:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CeeGee. Thanks for all the interesting articles you have already written about Turkey and Turkish women over the years, including the recent politicians. We try to pick up all the women's biographies each month on the basis of Wikidata entries containing human and female. You can see them listed in the Metrics section of the WiR main page. But we always welcome specific additions in connection with our monthly editathons and now offer the possibility of adding any other articles about women to our #1day1woman page. You can also tag your article talk pages to show they have been created under WiR. Usually the articles on our DYK lists already carry a WiR tag but you are certainly welcome to add Evin Demirhan to the September list. If you become a member of WiR, we will try to help you out if you run into any problems and will keep you informed of our activities. But there is certainly no obligation to join. We are always happy to see new or improved articles about women from any Wikipedia contributor. I hope nevertheless that you will decide to become a member of WiR as we could all benefit from your long-standing experience and would like to see improved coverage of women from Turkey. We have a long list of red links on Turkish women here.--Ipigott (talk) 09:06, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Yhank you for your reply. I see that a lot of work is awaiting me in WiR. I will enter my username in the list of members, and add the DYK article Evin Demirhan in the September list. I will be grateful for every assistance. CeeGee 10:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I think you'll enjoy working with us. We have a very friendly collaborative atmosphere. If ever you need any help, just let me know or drop a message on the WiR talk page.--Ipigott (talk) 10:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hi, I left a message for you at Talk:Poets' Sofa Park.--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abdi İpekçi Park

--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 22:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone left a "cite sources template" on hte page Abdi İpekçi Park, however the page is translated from the original Turkish page. Doesn't that make the cite sources thing not apply? The original Turkish article has a source, but simply copying sources is against protocol because you need to have accessed the source yourself to add it.--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I ask because I plan to translate more pages in the future. --TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 14:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no restriction copying and citing a source from an article, which was the origin of the translation. I've expanded and added the reference from the Turkish one. CeeGee 15:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah alright, I've had a problem before however when I translated a page from English and the people there kept removing my sources and reverting my edits because "The sources were bad" and "You need to personally read any source you put". So they were wrong right?--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 22:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş

On 9 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Mehmetçik", the common name for Ottoman and Turkish soldiers, is thought to commemorate Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş, who fought during the Gallipoli Campaign in 1915? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fethi Sekin

The page Fethi Sekin which you helped with has been marked with a notability alert. I believe that the pages notability is beyond any reasonable doubt. The sources provided are also relatively diverse. What can we do?--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 18:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you search with Template:Find sources? Have a look also at Wikipedia:Reliable source examples. Maybe, there is something on the net that can help. Sorry, I am very busy now so that unable to help. CeeGee 18:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added plenty of reliable sourcing. The "notability template" should be OK to remove. --TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 00:28, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CeeGee. You have new messages at Talk:List of Deputy Prime Ministers of Turkey.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Deletion Alert

Three articles Eren Bülbül, TAMEK, Valley of the Wolves: Homeland, that you helped create have been nominated for deletion. We believe that there is a good case to be made for keeping these articles. If/when you have time, you may decide to voice your opinion on the matter. Thanks!--ErenUygur (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CeeGee. You have new messages at Talk:List of nature parks of Turkey.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Melahat Okuyan

On 21 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Melahat Okuyan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Melahat Okuyan, a Turkish female microbiologist and AIDS activist, once proposed the establishment of male brothels for homosexuals and cross-dressers in order to improve public health? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Melahat Okuyan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Melahat Okuyan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!

		Welcome to Women in Red's November 2017 worldwide online editathons. New: The Women in Red World Contest Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Nomination of Abdi İpekçi Park for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdi İpekçi Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdi İpekçi Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Just Chilling (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest/Missing articles/Europe

Hi, any chance you could red link some missing notable Turkish women bios?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! let me check it. Thanks for the note. CeeGee 05:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ulusal Yukselis Aniti Sayfasi Hazir, isterseniz sayfayi acabilirsiniz

Bu satirdan sonrakileri kopyalayabilirsiniz direk.

{{Sculpture | image_file =Antalya - Statue of Ataturk.jpg | image_size = 250px | title = National Ascension Monument | other_language_1 = [[Turkish language|Turkish]] | other_title_1 = Ulusal Yükseliş Anıtı | artist = Prof. Dr. [[Hüseyin Gezer]] | year = 1964 | medium = [[Bronze]] | city = [[Antalya]] | length_metric = 600 |subject = [[Atatürk]] | museum = |coordinates = 36°53'12"N 30°42'11"E }} The '''National Ascension Monument''' ([[Turkish language|Turkish]]:''Ulusal Yükseliş Anıtı'') is an Atatürk monument by Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Gezer in 1964 located in [[Antalya]] [[Turkey]]. It has been described as one of Turkeys most meaningful monuments. The monument represents with a sudden rising base and figures right on the edge, the unity, and leadership of [[Ataturk]] leading Turkey through a series of victories leading up to the foundation of the [[Turkish Republic]]. ==Description== It is made of 12 tonnes of Bronze and is six meters high. The base is a concrete shell with concrete columns under the bronze figures, within the base, supporting the 12 tonnes of bronze. The base of the statue contains dates starting from 19 May 1919 including the many victories during the founding of the new Turkish state, including the revolutions giving the new state its modernity, these steps represented by the different levels in the base. Ataturk at the top flanked by a boy and a girl representing the youth of the nation and the trust that they have received. It's one of the most meaningful monuments in Turkey. ==History== The president of the Ataturk Monument Creations Organisation, Muharrem Önal Bey and the [[architect]] Tarık Akıltopu organised a contest for the monument. 28 projects entered into the contest and Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Gezers project was chosen. While the monument was being built, a proper location was being searched for in [[Antalya]]. Eventually the Republic Square ([[Turkish language|Turkish]]:Cumhuriyet Meydanı) was chosen. After the location was chosen the architect Tarık Akıltopu started to work on the foundation/base of the monument. The granite stones for the base were brought from [[Yenice]]. The monument which was funded completely from donations, was unveiled in 19 May, 1964. In 2014 the monument was extensively cleaned. ==References== *{{cite web |url=http://www.isteataturk.com/haber/4509/ulusal-yukselis-aniti-antalya |title=Ulusal Yükseliş Anıtı, Antalya |last=Çimrin |first=Hüseyin |date={{date|Jun 16, 2010|dmy}} |website=IsteAtaturk.com |publisher= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |quote=}} *{{cite news |last= |first= |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |date={{date|Feb 08, 2014|dmy}} |title=Antalya'daki Atatürk Anıtı bakıma alındı |url=http://www.ensonhaber.com/antalyadaki-ataturk-aniti-bakima-alindi-2014-02-08.html |agency=EnSonHaber |website=EnSonHaber.com |work= |location= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} }} *{{cite web |title=Ulusal Yükseliş Anıtı (Antalya) |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |url=http://wikimapia.org/1556567/tr/Ulusal-Y%C3%BCkseli%C5%9F-An%C4%B1t%C4%B1 |website=wikimapia.com |work= |location= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} }} *{{cite web |last=McLernon |first=Jill |title=National ascension monument |url=https://www.travelblog.org/Photos/9185721 |website=travelblog.org |work= |location= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}}}} *{{cite web |last=Gezer |first=Hüseyin |date= |title=National Ascension Monument Antalya |url=https://www.travelblog.org/Photos/9185722 |website=travelblog.org |work= |location= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}}}} *{{cite journal |last1=Sanem ÇINAR ALTINÇEKİÇ |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |first1=H |last2=DOKTUR |first2=Buket |date={{date|Jun 17, 2016|dmy}} |title=Yayalaştırılmış Bir Bölge: Antalya-Cumhuriyet Caddesi |url=http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/324205 |journal= Journal of Forestry Faculty |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=60 |doi=10.17475/kastorman.296494 |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} }} *{{cite web |url=http://www.fullantalya.com/antalyanin-heykelleriulusal-yukselis-aniti/ |title=ANTALYA’NIN HEYKELLERİ:ULUSAL YÜKSELİŞ ANITI |last= |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |first= |date={{date|July 12, 2011|dmy}} |website= |publisher=FULL ANTALYA |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} |quote=}} {{Atatürk Monuments}} [[:Category:Outdoor sculptures in Turkey]] [[:Category:Sculptures in Turkey]] [[:Category:Sculptures]] [[:Category:1964 sculptures]] {{reflist}}

Propper naming of villages

Hi! I can't understand why you changed Çetinkaya, Sivas to Çetinkaya, Kangal, when no other "Çetinkaya" exists within the Sivas Province. Since Çetinkaya is not a part of the Kangal urban area, the proper naming is the province, not the district. For example, Fenerbahçe, Kadıköy would be correct, because Fenerbahçe is a neighborhood with the Kadıköy urban area. This can be seen for example in Burr Ridge, Illinois, when there is only one village of that name in a state/province. When there are more than one in the same state/province, then the district/county name is included, for example Windsor, Mercer County, Illinois. Best regards. (Central Data Bank (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]

The change wasmade in the light of the discussion we had before. Nedim Ardoğa (talk · contribs) had given a detailed explanation to the topic. Best regards. CeeGee 15:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CeeGee. You have new messages at Talk:Ayşe Saffet Rıza Alpar.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Fatma Hikmet İşmen

On 15 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fatma Hikmet İşmen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in her first senate speech, socialist politician Fatma Hikmet İşmen accused the Directorate of Religious Affairs of fueling discrimination against Alawites by Sunni Muslims? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fatma Hikmet İşmen. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fatma Hikmet İşmen), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of European Merit

		The Barnstar of European Merit
		I, Vami_IV, award the Barnstar of European Merit to CeeGee for their participation in the European 10,000 Challenge, no matter how minor. CeeGee, you are a blessing to the coverage of Turkey on the English Wikipedia in a time when Turkey wants nothing to do with our work. Keep doing what you're doing, we need you. –Vami _IV✠ 02:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to CeeGee by Vami_IV✠ on 02:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

Two images

Hi,You have changed two images in Commons which I've used two days ago. When I compared the older and the newer versions the only difference I've seen is their resolution. It has shriked from about 3 Mb to to 50 kB. The obvious question is why ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:19, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nedim Ardoğa! I did not change the resolution of the images. I only untilted or turned them in correct position (horizontal or vertical). The resolution downgrade is possibly happening by this edit. The images are so small so that the resolution change is not a great issue, I think. CeeGee 10:30, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WiR December highlights

		Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons. New: "Seasonal celebrations" "First Ladies" "Go local!" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Remember the World Contest closes on Thursday, 30 November
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mustafa Tuna

On 28 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mustafa Tuna, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mustafa Tuna, the newly-elected mayor of Ankara, was previously an academic in environmental technology? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mustafa Tuna. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mustafa Tuna), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ayla Kalkandelen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayla Kalkandelen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayla Kalkandelen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri ^TALK 20:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CeeGee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, CeeGee.

AS one of Wikipedia's most experienced editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. ~~~~

Thank you very much for the invitation. I'm honored. However, I am sorry that I do not wish to accept it at this moment. I check and edit some Turkey-related articles I encounter in order to correct or improve them. I mainly focus on creating and updating articles. CeeGee 09:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aysun Aliyeva

A tag has been placed on Aysun Aliyeva, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:10, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ramize Erer

Hello! Your submission of Ramize Erer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -Apocheir (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!

		Welcome to Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons. New: "Prisoners" New: "Fashion designers" New: "Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Ramize Erer

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ramize Erer has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the copyediting. The issue has been resolved completely so that the warn tag of "copyedit needed" was removed by the DYK-reviewer. Best regards. CeeGee 05:39, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]