User talk:CT55555/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Firefighter William Rae (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Firefighter William Rae and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Firefighter William Rae, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, CT55555! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Rae (firefighter) has been accepted

Firefighter William Rae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:33, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello CT55555! Your additions to Draft:Wendy Porch have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. (I saw that you paraphrased a bit, but see the info on close paraphrasing -- your wording and order was too similar.. Thank you. eviolite (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendy Porch (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wendy Porch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wendy Porch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 23:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello, CT55555, I have noticed your interest in articles related to Disability. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Disability, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles dealing with disability on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendy Porch (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wendy Porch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wendy Porch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

James Thuch Madhier moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, James Thuch Madhier, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aloolkaparatha (talk) 14:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

MedMagLabs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, MedMagLabs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Thuch Madhier (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Thuch Madhier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:James Thuch Madhier, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendy Porch (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wendy Porch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wendy Porch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NeedsList (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NeedsList and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NeedsList, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NeedsList (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NeedsList and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NeedsList, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Surgibox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Surgibox. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 21:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surgibox has been accepted

Surgibox, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 20:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OmniVis (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OmniVis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OmniVis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OmniVis (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OmniVis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OmniVis, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 00:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

@User:S0091 OK thanks, I think it's time to give up on these and one other, I think I've learned meets the criteria and what doesn't. I'll keep it in draft in optimism that more media coverage in future may nudge this into notability and I appreciate the clear feedback that will help me learn and consider more carefully what warrants a page and what doesn't. Peace. CT55555 (talk) 00:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

If drafts go unedited for six months, they get deleted but you should get a notice beforehand. Any edit by a person, even a dummy edit, will roll it forward for another six months. If they happen to get deleted, no biggie because you can ask for a WP:REFUND. Please know nothing you have created to my knowledge is hopeless. Also, there are a million things to do around Wikipedia so if you ever need a break from creating new content try exploring something else. Wikipedia is better off with you around. S0091 (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Per our exchange above and on my talk page. S0091 (talk) 20:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you S0091

Powe

My intention at the Powe draft was to make it more like existing biography articles in format. I know nothing about the person, so cannot help there. Good luck. David notMD (talk) 15:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @David notMD you have made significant improvements. Any thoughts on the quality of my sources? CT55555 (talk) 15:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

I help out at Teahouse, but am not a reviewer, nor do I have any knowledge of the topic. David notMD (talk) 20:49, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oswald George Powe has been accepted

Oswald George Powe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:51, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mustafa Alio (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mustafa Alio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mustafa Alio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mustafa Alio has been accepted

Mustafa Alio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––Formal ^talk 08:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John Lee Tae-seok has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Lee Tae-seok. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:34, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Johannes, I have fixed (I hope!) all copy edit errors and would be delighted if you could approve. CT55555 (talk) 20:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Lee Tae-seok has been accepted

John Lee Tae-seok, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Madhu Pai has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Madhu Pai. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Nomadicghumakkad My assessment (and I said this on the talk page) is that Pai meets WP:ACADEMIC notability criteria for academics due to both criteria 2 (distinguished award) and 5 (holds academic chair) CT55555 (talk) 14:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Oh I see; didn't check the talk page yet. Will do in a bit. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Nomadicghumakkad for the approval and especially for the efforts you put in to improving the article, especially the layout and flow. Much appreciated! CT55555 (talk) 15:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madhu Pai has been accepted

Madhu Pai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Art Gallery of Bancroft (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Art Gallery of Bancroft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Art Gallery of Bancroft, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Priti Krishtel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Priti Krishtel. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

WAY TOO MUCH of the draft is her being quoted. Wikipedia cares little for what a subject says or writes. What is needed is references to content written about her by people with no connection with her. David notMD (talk) 03:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

That’s helpful feedback. Thanks. I’ll rewrite it soon with that in mind! CT55555 (talk) 03:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC) CT55555 (talk) 03:29, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidya Krishnan (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vidya Krishnan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vidya Krishnan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 18:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:Jupitus Smart and thanks for the very speedy review. I was surprised that you didn't consider her notable. I recognise there are a few primary sources and passing mentions, but there's at least three secondary sources and I wondered if you might reconsider? Specifically

1 https://www.newslaundry.com/2018/11/12/india-todays-gaurav-sawant-accused-of-sexual-harassment 2 https://www.thestatesman.com/india/defamation-threat-vidya-krishnan-sex-abuse-gaurav-sawant-1502708402.html 3 https://www.hindustantimes.com/education/3-indian-journalists-to-get-international-health-media-fellowship/story-gKBjOOKeTLJvlWSgd4JooK.html I believe considering WP:THREE that she meets the notability bar, but if you disagree, could you tell me specifically what the gap is? With thanks CT55555 (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

P.S. As I read my own comment, I've just realised that WP:THREE is an essay, not a policy, nonetheless, my main point about her being notable I hope stands. CT55555 (talk) 18:38, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

I am under the impression that Reference 1 and 2 constitute a case of WP:BLP1E and a very minor one at that with no lasting impact. Reference 3 can at best be considered as a press release saying that she was among a handful of people selected for some fellowship. None of these are enough to meet WP:N according to me. But then again you can re-submit it and wait for somebody else to re-review it if you feel that I am being harsh. Best. Jupitus Smart 18:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

I would disagree that she's known for only one event. There's the abuse allegation at her former employers, there's the commentary on abuse of journalists covering COVID19, there's the award, I'm not sure if authoring a book is notable without coverage, but still there's at least two things. I would prefer to try to reach consensus with you and hear your thoughts rather than rapidly resubmit. Is that possible, or is your decision final? User:Jupitus Smart CT55555 (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

The combination of things mentioned above are not enough to meet my notability standards. If she is writing on the sad state of affairs for journalists covering the pandemic in India, that does not impart any notability to her. And I do not believe the fellowship is considered so important as to impart automatic notability to all its fellows. And the book is probably the weakest claim to fame as writing a book is not by any means an indicator of notability for the author, let alone a book that is only expected to be published in the future. As I mentioned before, if you feel that my assessment is harsh, feel free to re-submit and I will recuse myself from reviewing. Jupitus Smart 19:00, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks User:Jupitus Smart for taking the time to explain. I'll reflect a bit on this, see what else is out there and consider my next steps with this draft. CT55555 (talk) 19:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Good luck. I see that some of your other articles are very relevant and I wish you all the best in your journey on the encyclopedia. Jupitus Smart 19:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

I just accepted this draft - in my opinion there's significant coverage of at least two events, the sexual harassment allegation and the reporting about (not by) her commentary of COVID-19 journalism in India. Rusalkii (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malual Bol Kiir (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malual Bol Kiir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Malual Bol Kiir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anita Schug (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anita Schug and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anita Schug, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Evans (activist) (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jennifer Evans (activist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jennifer Evans (activist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Madawaska Mine

I've reverted your change to the production numbers.

1. Your edit: 9,498,368 pounds (3,545,490kg) - 9,498,368 pounds is actually 4,308,387 kg.

2. Table 12 on page 50 adds up to 9,000,000 lbs. Not sure where you get 9,498,368 lbs. By coincidence that's the total on the bottom of the table. 9,000,000 lbs is actually 4,082,331.33 kg or 4,082 tonnes. You'll note that Proulx gets the lb/kg conversion wrong all the way down the table.

I've gone back to one of her sources for the data but it provides different numbers! for example

regards John beta (talk) 07:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi John beta I got the numbers from Proulx (page 47), of course you're correct that the imperial and metrics numbers I inserted were incorrect, so I support your revert of my edit. All the best CT55555 (talk) 12:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MedMagLabs has been accepted

MedMagLabs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 18:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caryma Sa'd has been accepted

Caryma Sa'd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 21:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Habon Ali has been accepted

Habon Ali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 18:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nmesomachukwu Umenwofor-Nweze (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nmesomachukwu Umenwofor-Nweze and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nmesomachukwu Umenwofor-Nweze, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:07, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dyno Mine has been accepted

Dyno Mine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 07:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Vivian Stamatopoulos has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vivian Stamatopoulos. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:03, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Nomadicghumakkad, I've replied and hopefully clarified. CT55555 (talk) 16:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bicroft Mine has been accepted

Bicroft Mine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greyhawk Mine has been accepted

Greyhawk Mine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 23:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur H. Shore (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LJF2019 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arthur H. Shore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arthur H. Shore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LJF2019 ^talk 10:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Field Ready (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Field Ready and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Field Ready, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you @Theroadislong for that assessment and feedback. I guess I let my possitive impression of them influence how I wrote. I just got two pieces of similar feedback in a row, so I need to reflect on my neutral tone. I've resubmitted this one with that in mine. I'll keep an eye open for neutral tone when writing about orgs that are doing social good. CT55555 (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ColdHubs (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ColdHubs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ColdHubs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Johannes for that assessment and feedback. I guess I let my possitive impression of them influence how I wrote. I'll try again and keep an eye open for neutral tone. CT55555 (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi CT55555! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Citation error, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Port Radium Mine (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Port Radium Mine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Port Radium Mine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @KylieTastic I half suspected there was a more thorough process for this, I appreciate you directing me to it. I've done it through the correct process now. CT55555 (talk) 11:48, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Escape From Manus (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Escape From Manus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Escape From Manus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Theroadislong this is the first time I've created an article about a book, before doing so I read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(books) and understood criteria #1 to mean if two newspapers wrote about it, it was notable. Can you tell me where I went wrong? I also notice you declined it within 1 minute of me submitting it. Is it possible you did this in error? CT55555 (talk) 14:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

yes I was a little hasty there, having had a second look, you are correct it does pass WP:NBOOK, re-submit and I'll be happy to accept. Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Theroadislong thank you for reconsidereding and for doing so so quickly. CT55555 (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Escape From Manus has been accepted

Escape From Manus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:17, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendy Porch (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wendy Porch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wendy Porch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 20:46, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bearcat and thanks for taking the time to add a full explanation. You're comment about me not understanding the difference between primary and secondary sources was very true when I first started this article. Back then this was the second artile I tried to publish and it's been rejected a few times. I thought I had figured notability and quality sources and I expected this one to pass on the basis of notability being establsihed by the independent reportong on her work. For example:

https://www.toronto.com/news-story/9340596-advocates-call-on-toronto-to-address-accessibility-challenges/

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2021/05/01/people-with-disabilities-face-confusion-and-other-barriers-to-getting-covid-19-vaccines-a-task-force-is-working-to-change-that.html

I'm ashamed that this didn't meet the bar again. Can you tell me where I'm going wrong? I'm having plenty success with other articles, but keep stumbling on this one, and not sure if I have a blind spot or something....? CT55555 (talk) 21:06, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

As noted, one key thing you can't do is cite sources where she was the author — but you also can't cite sources that just briefly quote her giving soundbite in an article whose core subject is something else, which is what both of the two above links are. Neither of them is about her, and instead they both just briefly namecheck her existence as a provider of soundbite in an article whose core subject is something else. What we need is coverage in which she is the subject that people are talking or writing about. Bearcat (talk) 21:19, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Maloney (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Maloney and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Henry Maloney, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bearcat I recognise this likely seem like the "naming and shaming" thing. I actually found him while researching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Uranium_mining_in_the_Bancroft_area mostly in a history book that I bought for the purposes of wikipedia contributions. I tend to write articles about uranium mining in the Bancroft area where he is notable for extending the operations the mine that largely contributed the economy of the region. The criminal alegations were a bit of a surprise, but I considered they added to his notability. CT55555 (talk) 21:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Generally speaking, the baseline for inclusion in Wikipedia is not just "local person whose local significance can be referenced to a local history book, the end" — while it's not completely impossible for local figures to get into Wikipedia (we do have some articles about mayors and city councillors, for example), the bar generally requires a reason why their notability could credibly be said to expand beyond the exclusively local, such as by having a plainly unusual volume or depth or geographic range of coverage that goes far beyond just what thousands upon thousands of other people doing the same job in other towns could likely also show. Generally speaking, don't write like your audience is the person who lives next door to you and is looking for information about your own hometown — assume your audience is on the other side of the world, and write an article that demonstrates a reason why somebody in Sweden, India or Japan would feel like they'd learned something useful and informative from reading it. That is, don't just verify that a local figure existed: demonstrate a reason why his existence was so significant that an international encyclopedia would need to maintain an article about him. Bearcat (talk) 21:40, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi and thanks Bearcat for that advice. I probably did get a bit local with my lens here. I think I'll delete the criminal bit, rewrite with that global lens, see if it can stand up through the AfC process without the criminal stuff and take it from there. I was mainly worried that you thought this was a bad faith WP:ATTACK kinda situation, it's not. I pretty much had this exact same conversation at WP:TEA a week ago, but it concluded with me thinking the mining/community stuff made notability, so I moved ahead. CT55555 (talk) 22:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bearcat I've rewritten with the global lens. I wondered what you think, should I resubmit? should I keep the criminal allegations in or out? I recognize it's not your job to mentor me here, so of course no pressure CT55555 (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vanessa Redditt (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vanessa Redditt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vanessa Redditt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 22:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shari Kasman (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shari Kasman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shari Kasman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 16:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendy Porch (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wendy Porch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wendy Porch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heather Goodchild (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Heather Goodchild and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Heather Goodchild, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 19:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Heather Goodchild

I've accepted your submission on Heather Goodchild after the additions you made. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 20:41, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Modussiccandi

CT55555 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidya Krishnan has been accepted

Vidya Krishnan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 20:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uranium mining in the Bancroft area has been accepted

Uranium mining in the Bancroft area, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clearfrienda ^💬 11:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1974 Elliot Lake miners strike has been accepted

1974 Elliot Lake miners strike, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Six Months In Sudan has been accepted

Six Months In Sudan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gazal world (talk) 22:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Life on the Ground Floor: Letters from the Edge of Emergency Medicine has been accepted

Life on the Ground Floor: Letters from the Edge of Emergency Medicine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 23:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ousama Alkhatib (December 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ousama Alkhatib and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ousama Alkhatib, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Maskalyk has been accepted

James Maskalyk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 01:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patrick Meier (humanitarian) has been accepted

Patrick Meier (humanitarian), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 1974 Elliot Lake miners strike

Hello! Your submission of 1974 Elliot Lake miners strike at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mindmatrix 02:52, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kevin Donnelly (football fan) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kevin Donnelly (football fan). Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 03:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi @User:Rusalkii, sorry about that and thanks for the feedback. It's well documented elsewhere that he's an author without needing to rely on that source, I've deleted it and use re-used other citations. CT55555 (talk) 04:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Welcome Exchange (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Welcome Exchange and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Welcome Exchange, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Vipperman (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Vipperman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michael Vipperman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Theroadislong and thanks for the very speedy review. Can you help me understand your conclusions please? I've included an article about this from Canada's most popular newspaper (Toronto Star), it's hardly a passing mention. He was also on the front page of the Toronto Metro. How can be be covered in the most popular national newspaper and be on the front page of another, reported on (indeed briefly) by others and not be notable? CT55555 (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Vipperman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Vipperman. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Theroadislong I hope it's OK to keep it here, this is too much for comments, I think. I did check on WP:ONEEVENT rule when doing this one, but after reading it, the event is about him, so I decided to proceed. Do you think I should change it to "MV's rejection of his certificate" type article? The following line was what prompted me to take the path I took "When an individual is significant for their role in a single event, it may be unclear whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both" I didn't see anything that says people notable for one event are not notable, just discussion if the article should be about them or the event. Right? They are still notable (just for one event)? CT55555 (talk) 17:34, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

PS i.e. People notable for one event do have articles - Lee Harvey Oslwald is notable for one event CT55555 (talk) 17:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

we generally should avoid having an article on a person when each of the three criteria is met:

If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event. If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view. In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article. If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented. John Hinckley Jr., for example, has a separate article because the single event he was associated with, the Reagan assassination attempt, was significant and his role was both substantial and well documented. Feel free to re-submit if you disagree, I'm happy to leave it for another reviewer. Theroadislong (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Theroadislong I'm not yet agreeing or disagreeing, still trying to learn (I'm still relatively new here). What I remain uncertain about is that it seems that your quote implies there is a bigger article about the event. There is not. No doubt the individual is not notable in any other way, but there is no main event article. Should I create that instead then? i.e. the guidelines seem to present us with a choice for one-event-people of article about person or article about event rather then article or not article. Right? CT55555 (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nhial Deng (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nhial Deng and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nhial Deng, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Vipperman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Vipperman. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:05, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi @TheroadislongOToyour point ""ome of the sources mention him in passing others do not mention him at all? Not sure there is enough coverage for a stand alone article about him OR the "event'?I" diodisagree. He's on tehefront page of the Toronto Metro and there is an ind epth article on Tthe oronto Start(Canada's most popular newspaper) I'd say those alone are substanctal. CT55555 (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syed Imran Ali (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Syed Imran Ali and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Syed Imran Ali, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 08:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Welcome Exchange (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Welcome Exchange and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Welcome Exchange, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 21:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi TheBirdsShedTears I note that WP:TOOSOON is an essay, not a policy. I think the correct policy is the general notability guidelines. And in the context of Reuters, NYT and Al Jazeera reporting on them, I am surprised if anyone doesn't consider them notable. CT55555 (talk) 21:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Press release, announcements, and routine press coverage are not sufficient to establish notability. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 22:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

I strongly agree. @TheBirdsShedTears and again refer you to the three mainstream news articles about them in the world's most credible news sources (none of which are press releases or announcements or routine coverage). CT55555 (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sana Mustafa (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sana Mustafa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sana Mustafa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 04:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexis Matos (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alexis Matos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alexis Matos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 14:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Welcome.US has been accepted

Welcome.US, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: An Imperfect Offering has been accepted

An Imperfect Offering, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 20:34, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Uranium mining in the Bancroft area

Hello! Your submission of Uranium mining in the Bancroft area at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mike Peel (talk) 20:58, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tartan Army Sunshine Appeal has been accepted

Tartan Army Sunshine Appeal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Aroha Parish

A now-blocked vandal, Aroha Parish (talk · contribs), reverted an edit of yours to Draft:Triage: Dr. James Orbinski's Humanitarian Dilemma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Please restore Draft:Triage: Dr. James Orbinski's Humanitarian Dilemma as you see fit. My apology for the disruption! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 14:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your public service, @Adakiko CT55555 (talk) 14:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome! Adakiko (talk) 14:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nnaemeka Ikegwuonu has been accepted

Nnaemeka Ikegwuonu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Princess of Ara 15:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2