User talk:Aroha Parish

WP:NOTHERE/WP:CIR

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aroha Parish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An extremely unfair block - I was only trying to be helpful! Aroha Parish (talk) 12:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You made 134 edits in two minutes, a rate of more than one per second. Maybe you mean well, but it is damaging to the project to make such rapid edits which does not allow for proper examination and suggests you are abusing some automated tool to perform them that quickly. You will need to remain blocked until you can provide sufficient assurance that you will slow down and take more care. 331dot (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aroha Parish (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An extremely unfair block - I was only trying to be helpful!

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 14:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nearly all of your warnings and reverts fail to demonstrate the required competence to edit Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you take a look at this user's contribs, they edited at an alarmingly rapid rate, performing their 134 unblocked edits within two minutes. Whether or not they used some kind of technological tool to assist them, it's clear that they aren't using common sense. I was reverted twice within 10 seconds for no reason. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't Jonathon Phelps do the same thing yesterday? Also, this smells too much like ItsLassieTime, rapidly reverting edits for no legitimate reason. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:29, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you take a good look at this interaction timeline, you might notice some similarities in behavior, in terms of their massive reverts. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 14:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yapp Hung Fai

Excuse me? How did I vandalize the Yapp Hung Fai page? I added all his career statistics in. Please do not revert it. Extremely unreasonable for you to warn me over that. No basis for it at all. CityPride (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like they were blocked for WP:CIR, just go ahead with the edits I guess. I'll clean up the mess. Nigos (talk | contribs) 13:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What was that?

Why did you revert my edit? You were not being helpful, in fact it was rather disruptive to undo my edits without explanation and give me a level 4im only warning for vandalism. Nigos (talk | contribs) 13:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

I can only assume you have done something in error. I just created a bona fide article and you have accused me of vandalism at Draft:Triage: Dr. James Orbinski's Humanitarian Dilemma. Requesting that you reverse this presumed error or let me know why you think this could possibly be vandalism. CT55555 (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Seems like I was not the only one unfairly accused of vandalism today? Glad I came to this talk page to that it wasn't just me. I was so confused. I would like to confirm that I can keep editing and not get blocked? Will follow your advice above @Nigos:

Coooohen (talk) 13:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, kinda surprised someone so new could find the {{uw-vandalism4im}} template so quickly. Whatever edits you made are probably not vandalism, so just go ahead with them. Nigos (talk | contribs) 13:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]