User:Gbawden/Archive 1
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 17:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)Talkback
[edit]Message added 09:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
kelapstick(bainuu) 09:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the recognition
[edit]Thanks for the barn star. I was glad I could help. Cheers. EricSerge (talk) 12:06, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
SA Army articles
[edit]It seems to me that the two of us make a pretty good "tag team" fixing up these articles. Cheers! I'll now add a summary text under each corps heading in the main SA Army article - we can't have sections that contain only a "main article" link. Roger (talk) 11:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]The South African Barnstar of National Merit | |
Awarded for hard work done to improve, expand and update articles related to the SANDF. Roger (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | |
this WikiAward was given to Gbawden by Roger (talk) on 08:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC) |
Adding categories
[edit]I've had to revert some of the categories you added to a few SA Army articles today. The problem is that you were adding parent categories of categories that were already on the articles concerned. I'll illustrate the issue with a simplistic example: The article "Poodles" would be in category "Dogs". Adding Category "Mammals" is redundant because Category "Dogs" is already listed as a subcategory of Category Mammals. The idea is to add articles to the "lowest" possible relevant level of Categories - they are then automatically included in the entire string of "parent" categories - Dogs > Canines > Carnivores > Mammals > Vertebrates > and so on... Roger (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks for your edits, I have linked to de. and hu. wp. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:46, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Montsalvat – A Symphony of Mud and Stone
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Montsalvat – A Symphony of Mud and Stone to a proposed deletion tag. It should certainly go - I'm amazed it has survived so long - but it doesn't really fit any speedy category. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
South African military topics.
[edit]If you're really interested in keeping in touch with happenings in and around the SANDF there are two websites that are absolutely essential reading - DefenceWeb - a news website and the Unofficial SAAF Website particularly the forum on the SAAF site. It's run by one of the Defenceweb journalists. In spite of its name the SAAF forum covers the full spectrum of defence topics and also civil aviation to some extent. Just be aware that while DefenceWeb is a reliable source, the SAAF forum is not, though it does often point out new developments and the members are very good at digging out good sources on a very wide variety of topics. Cheers! Roger (talk) 07:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks - have come accross both via google but will add them to my list of sites to visit daily or at least regularly. Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
44 Parachute Brigade
[edit]Dear Gbawden,
Please I respectfully request that you restore 1 Parachute Battalion back under the umbrella of 44 Parachute Brigade. All the content pictures were compiled and collated by myself and was created with the combined help of all the members of 44 Parachute Brigade. I am going to take this matter up with the membership will also be posting this to the other admins. Please restore it as the entire Brigade and it's context is written in relation to all the Battalions. I would also like to know the rationale for this in not requesting permission first as I am but a custodian of the whole group having put this together with the guidance of those who contributed (See references) Please restore kindly. Smikect 14:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Dear Gbawden, I see you have split off 18 light regiment as well. Please the context of these units need to be read in relation of the entire Brigade. 18 Light Regiment is a reserve unit of the brigade. You need to consult with the original content provider and compiler before you split things off please. The entire Wiki took me many many months to compile with much collaboration of content providers and putting pics together. In a few minutes you split off what took alot of effort to put together. Please restore back to 44 Parachute Brigade as it waters the entire brigade down if its individual units are split off. Smikect 14:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- You must leave at least a brief summary about each sub-unit in the brigade article. A link alone is not acceptable. An easy way to do this is to basically copy the lead of the subunit article into the brigade article - I've just done this. Please also never put "content forthcoming" in a "live" article. An article's integrity as an independent entity must never be compromised by having "holes" pointed out like that. Roger (talk) 17:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk page stalker
[edit]I just saw the note you left on my review and I'd like to clear up something. The phrase "talk page stalker" is a widely used and recognised way to refer to people who watch each other's talk pages. It is not a derogatory term at all, in fact it's meant as a friendly term. Please see WP:TPS. Roger (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Founding of the SADF
[edit]The UDF became the SADF on 1 November 1958 - the date when the Defence Act 44 of 1957 came into effect. Cite: The first page of - http://www.dod.mil.za/documents/acts/defence%20act44of1957.pdf Let me know if you need more research done. Roger (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Many thanks. Can you just have a look at my question on your talk page and comment on my rationale for doing it newest to earliest? Graham
Rank Structures
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
digitalreasoning.com searches as sources
[edit]I noticed you added at least two of these. Both are currently dead links. Could you look through them? That are the documents you're linking? Are they reliable sources? --Ronz (talk) 16:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! The other you added is in Gilbert Ramano. If you saved a copy of the source for Johan Retief, what is the actual document? There are a number of others like this that other editors have added that I'm trying to figure if they belong regardless of whether the link works or not. --Ronz (talk) 15:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification
[edit]Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!
You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify
Solution
[edit]File:Vice Admiral A. P. Putter SAN.jpg Select this photo which I have uploaded and copy the license conditions used. Re-use them in an edited form (names and Wiki-page links) for the other personalities you want to upload. This license description is usually acceptable on Wikipedia, but not on Wiki-Commons - so ensure you are uploading to Wikipedia. Then, also important to note is that the photo must be linked to a Wiki page. Non-free use images which are not linked to pages are batched for speedy deletion (note the red-link in the photo description: That link should be edited to point to the appropriate page where the image is used). I have not linked this one to a Wiki page - so it will go down the tubes soon if not linked. And, well done on your efforts on the SADF pages! Farawayman (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
SAAF History
[edit]Comments on splitting / removing History section from the SAAF page would be appreciated. Discussion here. Farawayman (talk) 08:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
SA Army recruiment forms link
[edit]I removed it because it violates the WP:NOTGUIDE rule. Curing the stupidity of readers is not our role. The Official website link is sufficient - if readers of the army's website can't find the information they want, it's the army's problem, not ours. IMHO most of the "Feedback comments" are complete crap and should be ignored. It seems to me that most WP readers are barely literate. Roger (talk) 20:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
How to rescue all these images
[edit]Use {{Non-free symbol}} to explain the copyright status of the file and then use {{Non-free use rationale logo}} to justify each use of the image. Roger (talk) 09:33, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. Also I think I will avoid uploading on Commons! Apparently commons doesn't do Fair Use. It does seem though that there is a new admin who is like a 19yr old in the army with a bit of rank! Farawayman had images on commons since 2009 without any issues and now those images are being targeted. Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Take a look at the conversation I started at WT:Non-free content#Fair use rationales for official logos, I hope they consider my suggestions seriously. Yes Commons is only for totally free stuff, fair use is not allowed there. Roger (talk) 09:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Rather add them to en:WP now and change the links in the articles before the deletions happen, so that the articles are not damaged by the deletions. Article readers should not notice any diffence when the images are replaced but if they first dissapear and themn only later get replaced that "damages" the credibility of the articles. Roger (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Per WP:NFCC#9 and the Foundation's resolution on non-free media, the only place where non-free media can be used is in main case. You cannot use non-free images in templates, period. --MASEM (t) 15:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Well the template contains just a simple table, so I don't really understand why wrapping a table in a template makes such a difference to the fair use status of images in the table? Roger (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Also, how would we go about obtaining free images for these images? Is it even possible? Would it count as free if we were to convert them into self-created SVGs? I find this all quite confusing. Darren (talk) 19:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please read WP:NFTABLE: non-free images are not allowed in tables, regardless of whether the tables are in a template or not. And for the record, I'm not an admin. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:43, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- The insigna have creative elements that make it impossible for those to be free images until they fall into the public domain, redrawing them will not help (that makes them derivative works and still copyright protected). --MASEM (t) 12:46, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- It would have been nice if Stefan2 had explained that I can't use it in templates when he went around deleting. Glad to see we have such diligent users out there. Such a pity we can't put it into tables - going to look hound ugly Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- In fact WP:NFTABLE does not totally prohibit NF images in tables. It allows a case to be made for exemption. I believe arranging a number of closely related images (rank insignia, which need to be displayed in a fixed sequence) in a tabular layout is a strong argument for such an exemption. The alternative does indeed look "hound ugly". Roger (talk) 13:40, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Roger the risk here is that if I add them to a table and the over zealous type then deletes the images from the table, the images become orphaned. I am away next week and if they aren't used in an article they get deleted, so I would have to upload them all over again. Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- I would like to know why none of the other articles that use rank insignia tables based on the NATO rank templates are getting this treatment. Why are they picking on SANDF articles only? Is this a case of WP:Wikihounding? Roger (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- I suspect so. It is unusual for a user/admin to mark items for deletion on Commons then go to each template and delete them (and infoboxes and and), normally they wait for the bot to do it! Things have become a bit more sensible since Masem has become involved. I didn't want to make a fuss and start an all out argie bargie. I need a drink Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- I would like to know why none of the other articles that use rank insignia tables based on the NATO rank templates are getting this treatment. Why are they picking on SANDF articles only? Is this a case of WP:Wikihounding? Roger (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Roger the risk here is that if I add them to a table and the over zealous type then deletes the images from the table, the images become orphaned. I am away next week and if they aren't used in an article they get deleted, so I would have to upload them all over again. Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- In fact WP:NFTABLE does not totally prohibit NF images in tables. It allows a case to be made for exemption. I believe arranging a number of closely related images (rank insignia, which need to be displayed in a fixed sequence) in a tabular layout is a strong argument for such an exemption. The alternative does indeed look "hound ugly". Roger (talk) 13:40, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- It would have been nice if Stefan2 had explained that I can't use it in templates when he went around deleting. Glad to see we have such diligent users out there. Such a pity we can't put it into tables - going to look hound ugly Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
We do have an interesting problem then. I suspect one reason why certain other images in tables, such as NATO rank templates, are ok is because any creative work by the US government enters into the public domain in terms of copyright, to my knowledge. I think it may be worthwhile trying to ascertain the exact legal status of works created by the South African government, though I suspect they'll be licensed under terms incompatible with Wikipedia. Still, worth a shot, does anybody have any legal contacts in this area? Darren (talk) 16:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- The Nato rank templates are used for articles covering the whole of NATO and quite a few other countries - not only the US. South African government copyright is based on British Crown copyright as used by the UK and other countries under the British crown, such as Canada, Australia, etc. so their tables should be "attacked" just like ours. Roger (talk) 16:55, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
SAAF
[edit]Thought you may find this to be of interest [[1]]. Farawayman (talk) 16:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Your approved HighBeam code failed to deliver: please email Ocaasi
[edit]Hi! Good news: you were approved for a free WP:HighBeam account. Bad news: Your access code could not be delivered because of your email settings. Please:
- Email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com with your Wikipedia username so I can respond with your account code.
Thanks! --User:Ocaasi 15:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!
[edit]Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
- The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
- To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
- If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
- HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
- Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:28, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012 wikification awards!
[edit]The Iron Wikification Barnstar | ||
For wikifying 11 articles, I also award you the Iron Wikification barnstar!!! Congratulations!!! |
Wilhelmina Will has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
I apologize for the far-too-long waiting period; I forgot that this responsibility rests on my shoulders nowadays! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 00:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
stub tags
[edit]Please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article like Jens van Son which already has a specific stub template: it just wastes other editors' time. Thanks. PamD 12:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Template for SA Navy ship names
[edit]I don't know if you've noticed it before - there is a specific template for easily formatting SAN ship names correctly - Talk:South African Navy#SAS ship prefix template I've just appled it to the Drakies on the South African Navy page. Roger (talk) 08:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Ahsham (Mughal Infantry)
[edit]Consider Ahsham (Mughal Infantry), please. --DThomsen8 (talk) 17:49, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token f14ef91c29da4a7723c5797c424a3416
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cape St Blaize Lighthouse, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.lighthouses.co.za/lighthouses/Tower.asp?TN=Cape%20St%20Blaize.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 13:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Hugh Cairns
[edit]Hi, I reverted your edit at Hugh Cairns (VC) as it appeared to be a mistake. He was a recipient of the Victoria Cross, so I see no need to remove a picture of the Victoria Cross from his page. If I am mistaken please let me know. Regards, HMman (talk) 14:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC).
Talkback
[edit]Message added Zia Khan 12:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback
[edit]Message added 08:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
-- Patchy1 08:04, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Please note that a WP:PROD is a one-use only thing. Once deprodded, an article should never be prodded again. Take to AfD if you still want it deleted (although also note that it is virtually unheard of for a verified secondary school to be deleted there). -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks wasn't aware of that. I am still not convinced that this school is notable. As I see it it fails the Significant coverage and Sources requirement. A google search just generates a name and address listing across multiple websites, nothing useful that can fill out this article Gbawden (talk) 13:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Andreas Raab
[edit]Hi :) I've added a source to the page of Andreas Raab so the deletion template can be removed. Additionally and unfortunately the rules for living people aren't applicable for him. CodeZeilen (talk) 15:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Andreas Raab was the brains behind a number of extraordinary advancements in the fields of Object Oriented Programming, OO UI design, 3D Immersive Collaboration Croquet, and he was the father of the Squeak community. He was also the person that brought Alan Kay's Squeak program to the Windows Operating system. His code is the basis for a huge number of production programs. I will try to add more content to ensure that his accomplishments are better appreciated by someone reading the article. itsmeront —Preceding undated comment added 16:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Andreas Raab is not a living person. He died on January 14, 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.63.70 (talk) 03:57, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Dennis P. McCann, proposed deletion due to lack of reference
[edit]I've added a reference. A link to a Turkish Ministry of Culture Page. Unfortunately, because I live in Turkey, any press references to me or my work from the past 8 years will be in Turkish. The press I received in the US when I lived there is unfortunately not online, though I do have scans of much of it. I'm a painter - what sort of references would you want?
Also, please keep in mind that the article is simply a stub. It will be fleshed out later, with exhibition information, paintings in collections on several continents, affiliations such as UNESCO...
Please let me know if you require anything more, and please keep in mind that fine artists are not exactly front page news (sadly).
Dennispmccann (talk) 16:09, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Silly nominations for deletion
[edit]Hi,
I strongly suggest that you take a good look at the notability guidelines. Especially in this case regarding those that refer to knighthoods and memberships of learned societies.
Thanks,
20:06, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Richhpal Ram VC.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Richhpal Ram VC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:31, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Lindisfarne
[edit]This page on the Lindsfarne National Reserve Trust should not be speedily deleted because... (I just started this page and it is not a knock off of some other page but a new article about a UK National Trust reserve and it will take me a while to gather and post the info. It will like other new pages take a while to research and write the article. Thankyou all for your understanding.) -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thechristiancontender (talk • contribs) 14:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- AND no it is not copy and paste as I was the one whom added the info in the LINDISFARNE article then decided that the Lindsfarme National Trust should have its own page as it is a huge info available on is subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thechristiancontender (talk • contribs) 14:30, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
what is an info box? I added info to the template section on right side but it did not show.... thx... will be starting many new pages shortly for islands which have nature reserves on or surrounding them... this was my first new page i started. Thechristiancontender (talk) 12:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:David Alan Stevenson.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Alan Stevenson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Alan Stevenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Robert Stevenson
- Charles Alexander Stevenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Robert Stevenson
- David Stevenson (engineer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Robert Stevenson
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Discussion on the AFT5 Request for Comment
[edit]Hey Gbawden - this is to notify you that there is a discussion starting on the Article Feedback RfC talkpage that has ramifications for the RfC itself. Your input is much appreciated :). Thanks! and apologies if I've missed anyone Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Louis Botha government (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Henry Burton, Thomas Orr, Patrick Duncan and Thomas Watt
- History of the Cabinet of South Africa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to George Bartlett
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013 Wikification Drive
[edit]Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!
February 2013
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Mediran (t • c) 09:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
You have a new message!
[edit]Message added 10:22, 6 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your account might be compromised
[edit]Hi Gbawden. Are you sure about your recent edits? --Shirt58 (talk) 10:47, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm reading "Chinese Revorushion (1946−1952)". My sincere apologies: we both are trying to fix up unambiguous WP:VANDALISM, and yet my better judgement went off in la-la land and/or Cocteau Twins fandom. Peter aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:22, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
I have removed your {{speedy deletion-significance}} tag from this article, as it is adequately referenced in local news, and via two articles in The Guardian. This is probably enough to survive an AfD, let alone a CSD. In general, you should not tag an article with sources for speedy deletion unless you are very confident every source is self-published (eg: Facebook, YouTube, other Wikipedia articles) and no reliable sources easily turn up on a search. Cheers. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your comment about Mr. Hare. I do not agree that Mr. Hare should be taken down. I have a few questions for you if you don't mind? I'm new to this so would appreciate your help - Mr Hare is a great brand and I think they deserve to be on here.
'It is adequately referenced in local news, and via two articles in The Guardian. This is probably enough to survive an AfD, let alone a CSD. ' I'm not sure what you mean by AfD or CSD - please could you explain in more detail. I was under the impression that any relevant press, especially from respected press is great to support the article.
'In general, you should not tag an article with sources for speedy deletion unless you are very confident every source is self-published (eg: Facebook, YouTube, other Wikipedia articles) ' So should sources be coming from Mr Hare's social media pages?
'The article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.'
They have a large fan following, a respected list of stockists and brands that they have collaborated with. All press comes from a respected source. Is this not enough to carry the case? I would appreciate any help.
Thanks, Steph — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steph Davies (talk • contribs) 18:58, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
While Scott Holland Memorial Lectures is a clear copy-paste, it is a list, and non-creative lists are not subject to copyright. This one isn't as clean-cut as some I've seen, if you disagree user:moonriddengirl is not just our copyright expert, but our list expert.
I think the article should be considered for deletion on other grounds, mainly notability. It may even fail importance, which would qualify as CSD, but I haven't looked closely. However, while happy to accept if MRG disagrees, I've declined this speedy and urge you to pursue other grounds.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
Being Human (UK series 3)
[edit]May I know why? — Bill william comptonTalk 11:48, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- I am guessing but if you are referring to why I marked it unreviewed - I thought it may have been reviewed in error. The page was deleted yesterday as it contains nothing that is not on the Being Human page. And today it has been re-created without being tagged. Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Hello. Thank you for your advice, it is very much appreciated. I will give it a try when it is next relevant and see if I can learn how to do it! Thanks again. NewellsOldBoy (talk) 07:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks again for your instructions. I have now included references with all the pages (stubs!) I have created. Once again, I'm very grateful for your help.NewellsOldBoy (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi. :) I just wanted to let you know that I disagree with the speedy deletion of this under WP:CSD#A7. This article suggests its subject is discussed in several reference works about artists and indicates that his art is or has been displayed in several of the most important museums in Hungary. I think these are credible claims of significance sufficient to escape speedy deletion. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello I have updated The Elgin Hotel page but I need some help. Whenever I am trying to insert a file in the infobox section from the Wikimedia Commons its show a small text file: frameless on top of the photo in the infobox. Can you help me out with what I am doing wrong.
Thank You MadlyBohemic (talk) 15:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello and thanks a lot for the wonderful comments and the help with the photo. Could you please explain why you feel that the page should be marked for deletion when another Hotel Windamere Hotel of almost similar status finds its page in Wikipedia.
Thank you MadlyBohemic (talk) 12:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
About the QWERTY Tummy
[edit]Hey Gbawden, could you please specify how my article was a hoax and and a form of vandalism??? Also my article is still under construction... I think it really shouldn't be deleted... Could you plz revert your request??? Thanks Ajayupai95 (talk) 12:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Test english welcome by Twinkle
[edit]I saw this page, which you tagged for speedy deletion; it's now a redlink, but only because I moved it without a redirect. It's plainly a template meant for use on user talk pages, so it's reasonable to keep it around in the creator's userspace until he figures out where he wants it. Nyttend (talk) 07:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 08:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Arjunaraoc (talk) 08:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I Heart Tuesdays
[edit]As this has already been to AFD previously, it is not eligible for PROD - please take back to AFD. Regards, GiantSnowman 11:52, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
[edit]Thanks for reviewing Chris Murray (RAAF), Gbawden.
Unfortunately FreeRangeFrog has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
AFD
To reply, leave a comment on FreeRangeFrog's talk page.
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Re: Adnan Kovačević
[edit]For starters the Bosnian Premier league is in fact listed at WP:FPL, but in the list of leagues that are not fully pro. This is not the only reason why I PROD'ed but it is part of the reason. Failing WP:NSPORT, a footballer may still be notability if he passes the general notability guideline, by having received significant coverage in reliable sources. This does not appear to apply to Mr. Kovacevic either. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Gobind Singh VC.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gobind Singh VC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:48, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Arthur Leyland Harrison VC.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arthur Leyland Harrison VC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:George Boyd-Rochfort VC.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:George Boyd-Rochfort VC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Post-nominals
[edit]In January you posted a couple of messages at Template talk:Post-nominals about problems with the {{post-nominals}} template not behaving as expected. This is just to let you know I'm pretty sure I've straightened out the underlying issue that was causing both problems. — Paul A (talk) 02:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
- Great Stuff, thanks. Well done on a great template! Graham Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
SANDF and recent/current events in the Central African Republic
[edit]Hi Do you think we might be able to scrape together sufficient source material for an article about the events (or at least to add sections to various relevant articles (44 Para and/or 1 Para, Recces, SA Army, Solly Shoke, JZ, etc)? The event is certainly notable as SA's biggest combat loss since Angola. Roger (talk) 11:12, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: 7 degrees C
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 7 degrees C, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's borderline I think, but the first source, to thehindu.com is reliable I think, and is probably just enough for A7. Probably wouldn't pass the GNG, so needs to go to AfD. Thank you. GedUK 12:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: SSBT OD05 Omnibus
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of SSBT OD05 Omnibus, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The WSJ source is ample for A7. . Thank you. GedUK 12:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
File:Pierre van Ryneveld.jpg missing description details
[edit]is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 00:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)- Apart from the message above, there is not enough information to verify the copyright status of the image, so the image is now up for discussion at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 13#File:Pierre van Ryneveld.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Blackpool Resort Pass
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Blackpool Resort Pass, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The tone is factual, not promotional. It is the tone of the actual article that counts for G11. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Bryan van Putten
[edit]Hi Gbawden,
I am new to wikipedia and did not understand how 'reflist' works. I tried to add sources but all I could manage were external links. I will continue to add references today for the Bryan van Putten article.
Zengalaxy (talk) 11:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello Gbawden,
I spent some time adding references and improving the article today. I think it's better than before, links have been added, also it has 5 references now.
Zengalaxy (talk) 13:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Erika DeSalvatore
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Erika DeSalvatore, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 08:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Tabaré Hackenbruch
[edit]Hi Gbawden. I have just expanded the article Tabaré Hackenbruch and added extra references. This man was mayor of Canelones (the second in importance in the country) during 15 years, and the effects of his (mis)administration are still felt, so I consider it is worth keeping. Please, reconsider your deletion template, thank you. Regards, --Fadesga (talk) 12:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of senior officers of the Argentine Navy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:25, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Danish bhat
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Danish bhat, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:20, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Suhaimi Hassan
[edit]Hello Gbawden, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Suhaimi Hassan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 09:57, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:SA Army Brigadier General rank.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SA Army Brigadier General rank.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ciaran McKnulty may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Confusion in the article name: Masood Ali Khan
[edit]Hi, thanks for bringing this issue, the article had been vandalized since my last edit. Is it possible for you to restore it to version the last here. All the delited sources and text will be restored. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 14:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I've reverted to the original article about a Pakistani sitcom. The title had been hijacked - the Project Pakistan template on the talk page was a good clue that something was going on... Peridon (talk) 13:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Image without license
[edit]Unspecified source/license for File:Paul Haddacks.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Paul Haddacks.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:00, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for categorizing some of the articles I created. I appreceiate it. Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 21
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raven Black (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Nights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013 backlog reduction drive
[edit]Military history service award | ||
By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your contributions to the WikiProject's June 2013 backlog reduction drive, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject award. Anotherclown (talk) 12:54, 3 July 2013 (UTC) |
You have assessed the article as needing an infobox. It has one. Would you suggest what else should be in it? see Talk:Derek Piggott JMcC (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: James Mcdonald
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of James Mcdonald, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: the source was published in 1915, so it is in the public domain. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 10:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey man, Can I ask you something?
[edit]Thank you for submitting the article to the American war correspondents catogery. However, my problem is that since most of the alphabetical orders by last name, you put it in the "J" section so can you move to a space between "Rob Morrison" and "William R. Moore (journalist)"? Thanks.
They are other categories you can put in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_reporters_and_correspondents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Reporters_and_correspondents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:War_correspondents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Journalists_killed_while_covering_World_War_II
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Journalists_killed_while_covering_military_conflicts
Can you please add Joseph Morton into these categories because my article is orphan which had no links to it. Thanks.XXzoonamiXX (talk) 18:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Somebody made this into a list and de-prodded it. Should it be nominated for deletion?
ModelUN (talk) 01:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Dale Irby
[edit]I concur with your nomination and also drawing your attention towards a random article I visited Amita Chapra only notable for an article and perhaps created by close relative of the subject. -спасибо --доктор прагматик 17:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Douglas Lafayette Weart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army War College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Tzaneen Local Municipality
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tzaneen Local Municipality, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There's a lot of additional info in this article (admitedly not very well sourced) than in the other. Thank you. GedUK 12:32, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
[edit]Your addition to Bad Boy (novel) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 16:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Powell F. Carter, Jr. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Joint Staff]] 1985–1987,<ref>http://www.whs.mil/library/Key47-04/58.pdf DOD Key Officials 1984–2004], Historical Office, Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2004. Accessed online 2010-02-03.</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canadian Forces Chief Warrant Officer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- forces.gc.ca/en/about-org-structure/chief-warrant-officer.page?</ref> || July 5, 2013 to present)<ref>http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/about-org-structure/chief-warrant-officer.page?</ref> || -
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:46, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunith Francis Rodrigues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Governor of Punjab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback Tool update
[edit]Hey Gbawden. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.
We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.
Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Raj Kumar Lekhi
[edit]I've changed your tag from band to bio. He may play something but it doesn't say so... Peridon (talk) 10:22, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello! I think your (and other editor's) time might be better used if you actually contributed to articles instead of just proposing the same for deletion. This edit probably took me less time than it took for you to tag it with a template... We are all volunteers and our time editing is limited. Let's make the most of it. --Bensin (talk) 18:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:SA Army Lieutenant General rank.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SA Army Lieutenant General rank.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Duplicate files question
[edit]Hi. You uploaded File:Joseph John Davies VC.jpg and File:Albert Hill VC.jpg, which are identical but used in two different articles. Can you please clarify which one is which? §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:29, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 16:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
William Anderson McNulty is my grandfather. Thank you for adding the information you've added :-) Tracy McNulty Thornton Thortrac (talk) 14:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013 Wikification Drive
[edit]Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's October Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by hundreds of articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts October 1, but you can still sign up! |
This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 18:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Paul Haddacks.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Paul Haddacks.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ronald Buck may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |caption = Vice Admiral Buck (left_
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:58, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Honours
[edit]Just noticed and reverted this edit you made back in January. Actually, the DCM is lower than the MC. One of the peculiarities of British decorations - although the DCM was a "second-level" decoration and the MC is a "third-level" decoration (and thus the DCM was awarded for a higher degree of gallantry), medals (awarded to other ranks only, except for the GM and QGM) are always ranked lower than crosses (awarded to officers and warrant officers only, except for the VC and GC) in the order of precedence and wear. Cheers. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. I learn something new every day! Appreciate the constructive feedback. Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
[edit]Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Please take a look at Talk:South African National Defence Force
[edit]Hi. I took the liberty of moving a very incomplete and poorly written secion of the article (about external ops) to the talk page so that it can be tidied up and completed. I'd apreciate your assistance with this. (BTW - How about archiving the older sections on this page? It's getting very long.) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:24, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Will do - been a while since I looked at that page. Some of the deployment stuff should end up on a History type page Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baleka Mbete may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- |caption = Mbete (left} with Vladimir Putin
- }}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the Cabinet of South Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbara Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive
[edit]Your Wikification Newsletter – Volume III, Issue I, November 2013
|
Also, I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's December Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog by over seven hundred articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! |
Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To unsubscribe remove your username from this list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:David Alan Stevenson.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David Alan Stevenson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Thomas James Young.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thomas James Young.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
[edit]As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:John Sherwood-Kelly.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Sherwood-Kelly.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cecil D. Haney may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- hands call for Pacific Partnership 2013 aboard the amphibious dock landing ship USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 130524-N-SK590-197.jpg|thumb|left|upright|Speaking during an All Hands call.]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Cape Town meetup
[edit]Hi Gbawden, I just wanted to let you know about, and invite you to, the 4th Cape Town Wiki-meetup at Truth Coffee on Buitenkant St on Sunday the 2nd of February. Cheers, --Discott (talk) 15:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
5th Wiki-meetup 4 May 2014
[edit]Hello, Wikimedia ZA would like to invite you to the 5th Cape Town Wiki-meetup for 11am, Sunday the 4th May 2014 at Truth Coffee on 36 Buitenkant Street, Cape Town. It would be great if you could join us. Please invite who ever you think might be interested.--Discott (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
Hurley
[edit]Better image IMO - Well, IMO, it would have to be REALLY bad to be worse!! Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
(I was going to complain about the spot on his nose, and then I realised that it was dirt on my screen!)
Possibly unfree File:Arthur Louis Aaron.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arthur Louis Aaron.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
My reply. Geo Swan (talk) 11:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
A challenge
[edit]If you're looking for something to do, how about having a go at expanding Union Defence Force (South Africa) and South African Medical Service? Both topics are in your field of expertise. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- I will. I need to find the motivation though :) I am taking a bit of a break from military stuff and thinking about doing an article on Selborne Dry Dock in Simonstown. I am studying part time this year as well, although working on WP is a useful distraction. Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:32, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Danie Theron Medal.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danie Theron Medal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 14 March
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the 41 Squadron SAAF page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hanno Teuteberg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- In June 2013 he was awarded the [[Order of Naval Merit (Brazil)|Naval Order of Merit Medal] from the Brazilian Navy.<ref name="NN413"
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 25
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South African Defence Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief of the Defence Force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:18, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Bertie Reed at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Alexander Picton Brereton.jpg
[edit]Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:07, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Bertie Reed
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Bertie Reed at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Allen3 talk 21:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Final notice. Unless you take action on to address the issues with this nomination soon, it will be closed as unsuccessful. --Allen3 talk 11:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Danie Theron Medal.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Danie Theron Medal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Navy Cross (South Africa).jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Navy Cross (South Africa).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Southern Cross Medal (1st type).jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Southern Cross Medal (1st type).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Southern Cross medal (2nd type).jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Southern Cross medal (2nd type).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:32, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Defence Review 2012
[edit]I have started a draft - Draft:South African Defence Review 2012, please feel free to participate. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of primary schools in South Africa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[Parkview Senior School]] ([[Parkview, Gauteng|Johannesburg]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Fritz Loots
[edit]Because you are working on biographies of South African military chiefs, can you run your eye over my new article Fritz Loots? Thanks. Conlinp (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 18
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keith Coster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Defence Force (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Submarine Squadron 4
[edit]None | |
Respectfully, if you weren't a member of Submarine Squadron Four, please don't edit our page. I have been working on it for three years making hundreds of hours of research into Navy records to provide the information. If you were a member of SUBRON 4, then send me a message. Thank you. Esquire122 (talk) 21:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:Jack Hindon Medal.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Jack Hindon Medal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tomasz Mathea, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.navy.mw.mil.pl/index.php?akcja=dowodztwo.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
AFDs for Active Royal Navy Vessels in 1982, etc.
[edit]Please do a group nomination instead of listing all of these separately. The instructions for how to do that are on the WP:AFD main page. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 18:52, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Re: List of recipients of the George Medal
[edit]Your article improvements at List of recipients of the George Medal are very nice. Please see the Talk:List of recipients of the George Medal. Are you still working on this ? Ready Aye Ready Tjlynnjr (talk) 20:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC) .
July 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Refiloe Johannes Mudimu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *[Merit Medal in Bronze]]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dickerson 41 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- The '''Dickerson 41''' [[Ketch]] was built by Dickerson Boat Yard located in [[Trappe, Maryland] in the late 1970s
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Devon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- railway station|Cranbrook station]] (which has already been approved), plus four new stations (including [[Edginswell railway station|Edginswell]] as a priority.<ref>http://www.devon.gov.uk/
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sabicas may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * '']]Flamenco Fiesta (Sabicas album)]]'' with the Los Trianeros group
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Swedish Navy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ** {{HSwMS|M20} - used as a museum ship (see the external link below)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vol. 1 (The Tempers album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{issues|{{refimprove|date=October 2013}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Regiment Boland
[edit]Hi, I was unable to find any references to the Regiment in any of the source documents. Its sister regiment, Regiment Western Province took part in Operation Savannah. If I do come across any references, I will let you know. Regards Paul Conlinp (talk) 12:17, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
33rd Regiment (Vietnam People's Army) and 275th Regiment
[edit]Gday. You probably noticed that I reverted your changes to both of these articles. Hopefully my edit summaries are clear enough to explain why but I'm happy to discuss if you would like. All the best. Anotherclown (talk) 11:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Harold Willmott.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Harold Willmott.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Jimmy Durrant.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jimmy Durrant.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Guthrie Wilson
[edit]Yes Guthrie Wilson got the MC not the MM; have added links to the official histories about the action Hugo999 (talk) 11:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Your recent deletion nominations
[edit]- Mate, you appear to do some really good editing and research - I believe you got that photo of Simonstown that really adds value to the article - but honestly, can you not see that lists of organisations/units/people are valuable not just as of right now, but at key historical points in time? Personally I would really like to have a listing of units and command structure of the SA Army at the height of the war in the 1970s or 1980s. That would be really valuable to see what the strength of the army was in relation to SWAPO or the Angolans, or the Cubans or Mozambique? Would you not think that a detailed listing of the Cuban expeditionary force in Angola in the 1980s would be WP:Notable? Well, the only thing that stands between us and having such a listing is that we haven't done the research yet.
- But for other articles, there's no mention of deleting the RAF's listing of fighter squadrons at the height of the Battle of Britain, is there? Even if a war did not actually take place, carefully compiling historical data about such forces and their organisation serves important historical research purposes, and builds our knowledge in general - and it's all GNG and RS etc.
- So please, should you wish to continue nominating these kinds of articles for deletion, would you mind pausing while I start a thread on the WT:MILHIST page? What you're doing so far is advocating wiping away the fruits of tens of thousands of hours' work by User:Noclador and others. Please, if you wish to do this, pause for 36 hours while I start a discussion on the main page. Regards from New Zealand, Buckshot06 (talk) 01:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Point taken. I understand a list per conflict but not necessarily per year during peace time. If the article wasn't an orphan I probably wouldn't have nominated it. It does bug me that my most notable work seems to be that photo :) Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Not per year in peace time, heavens, no, roughly every five years. Yeah, getting that photo puts you in the category of the people who go beyond the normal round; you really get a sense of how capable the base is.... Buckshot06 (talk) 08:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Point taken. I understand a list per conflict but not necessarily per year during peace time. If the article wasn't an orphan I probably wouldn't have nominated it. It does bug me that my most notable work seems to be that photo :) Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
I do not understand why my artice 49th Precinct was taken down. It is not an "orphan" article if you understand New York City where each precinct has a unique character befitting its neighborhood. BxPilot (talk) 20:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Have you completed your editing of this article? Because, I don't know what you think, but to me it looks (and is) a mess. Do you have a special interest in this particular parish, or more information about it? I can see what you were trying to do but IMO your attempt has not been successful. There is no reference section; there is no explanation of what a listed building is. And the project banners are now stuck on a redirect page! If you look at Category:Lists of listed buildings in Cheshire you will see that each of the parishes and districts in Cheshire with more than one listed building has a stand-alone list of those buildings. By combining a list with the parish article you have created inconsistency across the work being done by the Cheshire wikiproject in this area. For this sort of action to produce consistency, the other 290 lists would have to be integrated (properly) with the articles. Are you prepared to do this? Is it necessary? If not, I intend to return the article and list to how they were before your editing, for consistency and better presentation to the reader. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply on my talk page. Yes, I agree that when looked at in isolation the list was rather small to stand alone. But in the context of the category, where do you draw the line? Three listed buildings, five, ten, twenty? I decided that each of the parishes should have its own list, maybe small, with a link to the article. Then we would have consistency across the Project, and I did not see that any harm was being done or any sin perpetuated. (By the way, I do not get excited about "orphans", and see little point in the tag - but that's only my opinion.) As I said above, I intend to return the situation to where it was. If anyone thinks better, there is a lot of work for them to do on the other lists, and IMO to no real purpose. Cheers. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
AfD
[edit]You nominated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Army Reserve Center, Rio Vista on then-perfectly valid grounds; it was an unreferenced stub. I invite you to take another look at the article since I have expanded it and added references. --MelanieN (talk) 22:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I've declined your speedy there, and changed the W in the infobox link to an E as per the article text. That moves it from the Atlantic to Iran. Whether or not the place exists or is notable enough, I leave open. (After teaching map reading to young people, some of whom reckoned they lived in the Irish Sea, I'm careful about E and W, and the even harder + and - used in some GPS. Why couldn't they just use all 360 one way instead of having two 180s?) Peridon (talk) 11:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Incidentally, the map that now comes up has an interesting feature on it - a place called Carl E. Duckett. We don't seem to have an article on that place, fortunately. Might be an idea for someone to tell Google Maps, though. Peridon (talk) 11:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Schools in Cape Town
[edit]Thanks for the tip. I created the list as I had just returned from Wikimania where the South Africans were talking about doing a Joburgpedia in Cape Town. They did show a nice video based at a cape school. I'm not sure what the right classification was for SA schools as Im not sure which are State run and which are private.... so its tricky for me to add too many. Hopefully others like you will add a few and sort out a system, although I wanted to avoid a wall of red links. Keep me on the SA interest list. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 10:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of List of countries without ice rinks and ice hockey for deletion
[edit]Excuse me, but are you nominate for deleting my new page I created? No offense, but is this page horrible? AaronWikia (talk) 13:47, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. 64.4.93.100 (talk) 18:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, that's not fair. Postdlf deleted my page I created because of unreferenced hockey-related junk articles such as Pakistan national ice hockey team, Indonesia Ice Hockey Association or United Arab Emirates at the Winter Olympics. AaronWikia (talk) 21:02, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for working to clean up the encyclopedia. In case you're not aware, WP:PROD is usually a more efficient way to deal with articles like this. ~KvnG 03:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Nowhere Men
[edit]Hello there! You opened an AfD on Nowhere Men (comic) last week, which got relisted because no one commented. Since then, another editor and I have (independently of each other) heavily expanded the article and added quite a bunch of references. I'm hoping that you would consent to take a look at the article as it now stands and let me know if you still have concerns, whether on the front of notability (and thus AfD-related) or otherwise, as that would give me some direction in deciding what, if anything, to tackle next in regards to that article, especially as comics-related articles are rather far from my usual working area when it comes to content. If not, that's quite okay as well, just figured I could ask.
Have a nice day,
AddWittyNameHere (talk) 01:20, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response! I am glad that all concerns have been addressed. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 06:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Seeagand
[edit]Why do you say that this page it`s a copyright text, it's an interpretation of the poker variant seeagand rules. if is normal than text structure is similar and that should be the same steps.
How i can post this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CMMR 74 (talk • contribs) 09:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi the text is write for me and my own words, the only similarities are the steps, as it is the rules of a game and can not be changed, can be rewritten but not changed. In fact in other languages there has been no problems.
CMMR 74 (talk) 09:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Victoria West
[edit]Hi - I see you've been removing links to Victoria West from Canadian articles as the main link is for the South African town. There is an article on the Canadian one (Victoria West, Greater Victoria) in case you'd rather link to that, rather than delink? Cheers, Number 57 09:38, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
- PS, I see you also removed it from numerous South African articles, presumably by mistake? I hope you don't mind that I'm rolling those edits back. Cheers, Number 57 09:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Louisa Fennell I note you have recently added a notice on the article re Louisa Fennell that the article is being considered for deletion. I have just carefully re-checked the item and would be very pleased to hear your more specific comments as to why. The article is short, as public knowledge of her private life appears to be lacking and scant, but the citations and verifications appear to be in order. In what way would you suggest it should be cleaned up Whereas I accept that the subject is not a world renown artist like Goya or van Rijn (ALIAS Rembrandt) and is probably not very well known in Outer Mongolia, but she (or rather her name and her works) are well known and respected in the West Yorkshire area. Thanks in anticipation Alan M Alanfromwakefield (talk) 14:40, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: Future for Religious Heritage
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Future for Religious Heritage, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Electronic Recycling Association
[edit]Hello Gbawden. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Electronic Recycling Association to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC)