User talk:Esquire122
What is the purposr of creating this new article rather than addinfg to the existing Submarine Squadron 4?TheLongTone (talk) 00:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
On the other page, I wrote about 90 percent of SUBRON 4's history. What started three or four years ago as a few mere paragraphs, I turned into a complete history. Someone thought it okay to just move all of that important history to the talk page without even so much as a courtesy note to me. Fine. I am done with that page, especially when editors come along who never wore the uniform and don't understand Naval Traditions and History.
I will maintain the new page since I started it and it will be a repository for SUBRON4's history all the way back to the beginning and the page's focus is that very important history.
Respectfully, ET2 Mike Esquire122 (talk) 02:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Which does not answer the question: why two articles?TheLongTone (talk) 11:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of The History of Submarine Squadron Four, US Navy for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The History of Submarine Squadron Four, US Navy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The History of Submarine Squadron Four, US Navy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
An offer of help
[edit]Hi. I see you've run into some difficulty with The History of Submarine Squadron Four, US Navy / Submarine Squadron 4. I know little about submarines although a certain Thomas Dolby song ranks as a favourite of mine; however I am an experienced Wikipedia editor and I would like to extend both my encouragement for you continue to editing articles of interest, and also extend an offer of my help if you need assistance in editing, structuring or otherwise developing article content. Best regards. -- Whpq (talk) 19:05, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your offer. I have started a Facebook page with all of my years of historical research on my old squadron. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1449516395305558/ Anything you want to glean from that FB page for Wiki use is fine with me. Esquire122 (talk) 15:47, 2 July 2014 (UTC) Respectfully, Esquire
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)