Talk:M9 armored combat earthmover

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Untitled

Where can I buy one of these? Roderick Spode 19:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you want to? Nothing but maintenance problems

Yeah, ACEs are fun as hell to drive, when they work. They say you can leave a brand new ACE in the motor pool, not drive it for a couple of months and it'll still somehow get Class III leaks. Some like to call it the "Hydraulic Nightmare". I have a friend who attributes it's problems to two things. It was designed for the Marines, and it was designed by a woman. Ultratone85 06:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from this URL: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m9-ace.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 02:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Issues

This article has a number of issues:

1. No sources/citations (tagged since 2007) 2. Original research (speculations on hypothetical combat performance) 3. Out of date (references to upgrades due to be completed in 1996, etc.) 4. Style issues (breathless prose, un-encyclopedic tone) 5. Copyright issues (large sections of this article appear to be lifted verbatim from company literature) 6. Overly technical (extreme detail given to maintenance issues, with little information of interest to a general audience)

In light of the wide-ranging and serious faults with this article, I am requesting expert attention for the subject. I am certainly no expert on the subject, or I would gladly rewrite this article. As a layperson, I have learned virtually nothing from this article, except that a combat engineer vehicle designated M9 exists. As written, this is either a company brochure or a repair manual.

Dpenn89 (talk) 01:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it, to be honest, whether expert information or not. As a someone responsible for mainting the M9 ACE a lot of the information was good stuff you couldn't find elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.59.12.226 (talk) 06:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]