User talk:Pinkadelica/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Message

Yes, we is me being affiliated with the site. Thank you very much, I fully understand what you are saying. I will be adding it to the Tameka Cottle article. Thank you very much for your understanding.

Masiela Lusha

Would you please take a look at the links I moved from my talk page to Talk:Masiela Lusha and render an opinion on the acceptability of them? You might want to look here for what was added and removed, and also here for my opinion on the sources. I am not too keen to do much on that article. I found it interesting that this all came about today just a few hours after her agent tried to expand the article here. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thanks for cleaning up the references for Corinne Griffith. I really appreciate it. Stutzey (talk) 13:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

It really is me...

Oh mai!!! LOL. Traceroute. Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Spencer Tracy filmography

I have opened a discussion at Talk:Spencer Tracy#Filmography regarding the removal of the filmography from the main article and discussion regarding no need for spinning the filmography into a separate article. Please comment there. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

The Game

I thought I'd just add that I was reverting the edit last night and it wouldn't take because you had just done it. I think this person must be related to Jawn Murray somehow, given the extraordinary efforts to use his source and the earlier efforts to put in plagiarism claims. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about those edit conflicts. Did I get the username right in my post? Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Teddy Stauffer

I notice that in this edit you changed Teddy Stauffer’s birth name from “Ernest Henry Stauffer” to “Ernst Heinrich Stauffer”. That contradicts the information in the German Wikipedia article, de:Teddy Stauffer. Do you have some knowledge that that was his name, or was it just a guess? —teb728 t c 23:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Lifetime

I noticed when editing you recently added the template {{Lifetime}} to an article, replacing DEFAULTSORT or categories in the process. While the template {{Lifetime}} is a useful short-cut when setting up biographies it is not generally considered wise to replace existing categories or DEFAULTSORT for a number of reasons. The chief amongst them are that the template hides information from editors and automatic processes or requires additional knowledge to understand. This is only a minor point, many thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, please keep it up!

Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 06:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC).

WP:FILM September Election Voting

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

More Game

I am about to save the WP:AN/I report. The IP basically said the blog was his when he first put it in, both on the talk page and in the article, so I'm assuming COI. It's the only explanation I can come up with for pushing the page that hard. wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP 70.108.59.249. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Um, then again, it works, huh? Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Brittany Murphy

What's this? You don't like "Disarsters"? Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Beats me....

I don't know how you missed it.  ;-) I'm glad you like my Kylie Smiley. Rossrs (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Adnan

I can't find where anything was done after the decision to redirect it. I see it was "unredirected" arbitrarily in October 2008 after it had been redirected for 6 months following the AfD. I can't find any review following the one of February 2008. A person isn't notable because Britney Spears had a restraining order against him. I think the AfD decision for redirecting is valid and should be enforced. It was protected once to prevent it being restored. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I redirected it. If anyone has a problem with it, I'll ask an administrator to protect it again. That's ridiculous. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:22, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Aw geez, I'm sorry. You can go over to Talk:Audrey Hepburn and weigh in there to feel better... Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:31, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks on Shadows (1922 film)

Thanks for cleaning up a little bit of my article Shadows, the Lon Chaney film- I noticed it was completely missing, and just had to make sure it was included. I also had to snag your History Channel userbox- the NERVE of the History Channel not having real programs on anymore! I've been complaining about that for a couple of years now!!! :D Monsieurdl ^{mon talk-mon contribs} 16:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it has gone so far down the tubes that I don't think Liquid Drano would be effective enough to salvage it :P I haven't watched History International recently- is it any better? I would watch the Travel Channel's shows on travel if that God-awful pretentious woman Samantha Brown wasn't doing the travelling! Is there any relief out there? Maybe we should start a petition! Monsieurdl ^{mon talk-mon contribs}

14:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

My Inadvertent deletion of text on Robey's talk page

Thank you for your note of the 7th, that I had removed text from Robey's talk page. I am frankly baffled. I had intended only to add a question, not delete anything at all. I've looked at the history page, and still don't get it. I thought I knew this stuff cold; I supposed I'd better relegate myslef to a sandbox. GcT (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

The Game, restarts it does

You might want to take a look at User talk:Tedder. The game's afoot once more. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:48, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

infobox

I tried to make infoboxs for the pages I have created but it didn't work.How do I make infoboxs.P.S. Thank you so much for adding more information to the pages I have created, you are a big help.--Anesleyp (talk) 14:36, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Awesome!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		{{{Keep it up!! Nice user name too! A8UDI talk 02:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)}}}

Re: Spam

Hi Pinkadelica,

There is nothing fictious about what I wrote on Chilli's Wikipedia page. I am attempting to reach out to her in hopes of helping her with "Bipolar" and future artistic projects. This does not constitue spam. Being that the information listed is true, it should stand.

Regards,

Kevin L. Sellers Ksellers3 (talk) 02:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

newbie question

Hi, I am new to wikipedia. You just undid an edit I made to the Joseph Smith Jr. page. I notice the word vandilism in messages from the wikipedia webserver, and also that you mentioned it in your message to me. Please tell me what is meant by "vandalism".

explanations

nevermind, I see what you meant in your first message to me, I figured out how to add an explanation.

trying it again

Hi, I think you undid my last edit very quickly. I had provided an explanation this time. Did you read it first?. Please read the entire article, and my complete edits before undoing it again. I am going to do it again with an even better explanation. I agree that sourced material should be retained as long as the sourced material is relevant to the article.

Before my edits, the article has over 8000 characters covering the early treasure hunting days of Joseph Smith- but Joseph smith isn't liked or disliked around the world because of his early treasure hunting experiences (which ended as soon as he had adult responsibilities). Joseph smith is liked or disliked around the world for the doctrine he preached and the church he created. That is why I am taking treasure hunting out and putting the first vision in.

Relevance.

Adelaide revert

Hi, just letting you know the edits weren't vandalism; however, they were correctly removed, as it is probably nn. Aaroncrick (talk) 10:05, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok, just letting you know. All the best. ;) Aaroncrick (talk)

Patty Duke

Pinkadelica,

The reference for my addition about Patty Duke is myself, Allen Astin, and The Los Angeles Superior Court. I made one minor revision and the statement is nothing but verifiable fact.

Anna was a significant influence in my life and I wish her the best...She is really a wonderful person. I also want to preface what I’m saying by sharing that I, as a thirteen year old, was one of the main proponents of the adoption and after the divorce I honored Anna’s desire for distance. Still, Anna’s new life and subsequent emotional and physical distance hurt deeply and severed feelings of trust which had a lasting impact on me (this is obviously my opinion and not fact).

The adoption of, and embracing of, three young boys and her subsequent change of heart was understandable as she wanted to start a new life, but regrettable from a parental stand point. The strong psychological and emotional effect that this had on all three of us is too subjective and I did not include this information. What I have stated are just the facts. It’s not the prettiest aspect of Anna’s history, but it happened. In society, we idolize celebrities and we don’t really want to know the truth if it is dissonant with our beliefs about them. This is natural.

Here is the revised statement:

After Duke’s divorce from Astin, Duke and the Astin boys had little or no contact. In the late 1990’s all three of the Astin boys terminated their relationship with Duke as their legal mother by being adopted by their biological mother. However, all five of the Astin boys, David, Allen, Thomas, Sean, and Mackenzie still remain close.

This statement has nothing but facts.

Fortunately my life today is very beautiful and full. As I am a product of my past, I don’t regret what happened. I also know that the truth, however painful, is freeing. Personally, I believe that one of the causes of mental illness is when an individual cannot cope with the dissonance that arises from who they actually are verses who they wish they were.

If you'd like to use this statement as a reference, please do.

Wishing you the best,

Allen Astin user: allisbeautiful

HarveyCarter sock

Thanks. I can never remember whom to contact to make these things happen. It's like every time I run into this sock, I have to start from scratch figuring out how to get him blocked. Poor management skills. :-) Thanks again. Monkeyzpop (talk) 05:31, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Nah, it's just that we always hope the person will just quietly go away. I used to jump to file the SPI until I figured out that most administrators remember prominent socks and will deal with it. Wildhartlivie (talk) 06:18, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

The Game (U.S. TV series)

It's official OK? The deal has been done. The Game will now air its fourth season on BET. The King Gemini (talk) 01:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

You sayin' the source we had ain't good enough? The King Gemini (talk) 13:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

How you gon say Sister 2 Sister ain't a official source? The King Gemini (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS October Newsletter

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Clara Bow

Hello. I added some more material to the CB article the other day, and as usual there was a busy bee who cleaned up my mess. Thank you. However. What to do when "truth", as in the case of CB's screen debut, are split but equally sourced? As I see it you have to communicate that. If you don't, you end up a lier. CB was born 104 years ago, and as a superstar, there are a jungle of myths surrounding her. She have become a kind of "Münchhausen" figure and telling her story is not easily done without exposing contradictions and controversies. I assume your deletion of the last few lines of CB "fame and fortune" was not an expression for some Wiki policy unknown to me, like the rigid rules for using italics in quotations. my best stovelsten talk

Spencer Pratt article deletion

Just an FYI - the editor suggesting the article be deleted is a known trouble-maker and vandal. He has (a) vandalized the Pratt article more than once, and (b) has suggested at least one other established article be deleted simply because he doesn't like the person the article is about. He's also vandalized my own talk and user pages countless times. I jumped on this only because I'm pretty certain I know what he's up to.. SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 03:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I figured you would appreciate the heads up. Thanks for the reply. :-) SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 04:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Heh

Ebonics, huh? Wildhartlivie (talk) 10:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

That be so. I usually look when someone posts to your talk page, you're so well-loved!!! Night!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

The Game (U.S. TV series)

I'm guessing you won't like this one either. [www.theroot.com/blogs/game/bet-could-redeem-itself-game]

I knew that other edit wouldn't stick, but I was trying to give people hope. A site I go to won't allow links and no one could offer these people any kind of proof. They keep coming on the site and posting pleas for the show to come back. I thought it was a done deal until I started searching. I guess if these sites are all that come up and even they look like speculation ...

Anyway, I told these people how to cheat and look at deleted Wikipedia edits, and the moderators amazingly allowed that.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

[1] looked official to me, but the moderators tend to remove links. So I never got to verify it and I was assuring everyone who posted, not having seen that, that it was official. Now I know better. It has been kind of annoying watching these people try to save their show. Several months ago it got really bad and a lot of posts had to be deleted.

I'm not even a fan. Once it was clear Tia Mowry wasn't going to be the show's focus, I got tired. I enjoyed Sister, Sister a lot.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

AN/I

Thanks. I didn't even know that what's his name had filed the "threat" note and did not until you told me about the Suratt thing. What a shite night. I posted for both of them. Thanks again. Wildhartlivie (talk) 03:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

use of term "blacklisted"

I'm not going to get into the details of the value of the link, as it appears to have already been addressed. However, I will say that it appears that the term "blacklisted" is wrongly being used to describe the link - it's more accurate to say the link is on a "spamlist". Any site on either the local or meta blacklist would not be possible to add to any article - the mediawiki software won't allow a page to be saved if a blacklisted site is added. The fact that the site can be added is evidence that it's not on the official blacklists at this time. However, the site does appear to have been added to Xlinkbot, which automatically removes links to sites that have been reported as having been abusively spammed in the past.

Still, abusive use in the past isn't in-and-of-itself a reason to remove new additions of the link, and the only person posting about it on the talk page so far appears to be the person adding it. I have seen good arguments at WP:ANI for why the link isn't appropriate - but those discussions should be taking place on the article talk page, as the edit summary comments are resulting in a developing edit war. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

The best reason is that it is a blog and the only valid content that might be included from the link is available elsewhere, including moviefone.com, which is a reliable source. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:25, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

If I used the incorrect term, I apologize. In regards to discussing the link, that has already been done by Wildhartlivie and Koplimek which is located on Koplimek's talk page. Like I said on the AN/I thread, Koplimek didn't like the answer so they immediately went to AN/I to complain. Twice. Pinkadelica^♣ 05:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Adam Goldstein

It says in the "death" section of the article that he was found dead on the 28th, but it also says that his friends couldn't reach him for a few days before that. If you take that into account, you get this conclusion: He died a few days before he was found dead. 98.216.203.117 (talk) 02:40, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't have a source saying exactly that. However, his friends were trying to reach him for a few days. It says it in the article itself. And what's 3RR? 98.216.203.117 (talk) 02:47, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

But then again, there's no source saying that his exact death date was the 28th, is there? 98.216.203.117 (talk) 02:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

That's true. However, we can't list his official death date as the 28th if that wasn't the exact day he died. All we know is that it was in August. We don't know the exact date. 98.216.203.117 (talk) 02:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Boone

Richard Boone the same comment about the gaybar is being added repeatedly by an IP to this article, would you have a look on the talkpage at the discussion, I have asked for a third opinion, it is an attempt to say that as this is claimed then he must be gay, synth, I would appreciate it if you would let me know what you think, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 12:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Is there some relationship to this sockpuppet ? Off2riorob (talk) 12:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for you comments, the comment is gone now and I so totally agree with you, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 17:55, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Personally, I'd like to see a breakdown of just how many legitimate edits have ever come from that IP range and a good rationale for why they shouldn't just block the entire range. Personally speaking, that is. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

I remember someone saying they couldn't block the range because it would cause too much collateral damage, but having checked some of the IPs, it looks like HC is the only one that uses them to edit. Pinkadelica^♣ 19:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

And they have a process to register accounts that are inadvertently caught in range blocks. I think it's just an excuse. Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

The Beautiful Life - Reliability of sources.

With reference to your recent reversion of edits on The Beautiful Life, can you please tell me where on Wikipedia it says that the News of the World and associated publications cannot be used as reliable sources? You claim in your edit summary that, because it is a tabloid, it is not a reliable source. However, WP:RS makes no mention of any such guideline, and it seems to be simply a statement of your own particular opinion. As a published mainstream national newpaper, the News of the World (and any associated publications) clearly have editorial review, and are generally available. Take a read of WP:RS, and you will see that it states "Material from mainstream news organizations is welcomed, particularly the high-quality end of the market." Nowhere does it say that material from news publications perceived as being tabloids cannot be used - In fact, no mention at all is made of the acceptability or otherwise of such publications, and no differentiation is made between tabloids and broadsheets. Indeed, if you look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:News_sources/Europe#UK, it clearly lists The Sun, which is the News of the World's parent publication, as a source that editors can use to research current events and news stories. Would it be there if it was not considered a reliable source? I think it is clear that it wouldn't, so why are you questioning the reliability of the quoted source?

Also, you removed information sourced from an official Twitter page. While it is true that, ordinarily, such pages cannot be used as sources for articles, WP:RS does contain an exception, as it states "Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, blogs and tweets as a source for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the biographical material." As the Twitter page in question is the official page of one of the cast members from the show, and directly relates to a show in which they star, I believe that this exception could well apply - Maybe it needs a loose interpretation of the guidelines, but WP:RS is a guideline and not a rule. And the article did state that it was something posted by the person in question on their Twitter page, so the source attribution was clear and unambiguous.

As for your other reason for removing information, that again seems to be simply a matter of your own personal opinion. Personally, I believe that, as it is something directly linked to the show, it is relevant and should be included. Maybe the subject of inclusion or otherwise needs to be taken to the article's talk page to see what other people think? With regard to that, I've opened a discussion on the article's talk page. Emma white20 (talk) 01:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JadeIWannaLoveYou.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JadeIWannaLoveYou.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MindBodySong.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MindBodySong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for the Working Wikipedian's Barnstar. It's my first! I am flattered and very appreciative. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Just to let you know....

Just to let you know, I don't appreciate how you suddenly decided to "tidy" this page as soon as I posted a message criticising you, and then moved the discussion over to my talk page to try and make me look bad - I'm sure there are a few guidelines about how you're not supposed to do that! Emma white20 (talk) 20:02, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Tense for non-airing TV series

Hello Pinkadelica,

With reference to your recent change of the tense in the first sentence of Ozark Jubilee from was to is, I appreciate your rationale that "episodes still exist." None has been broadcast since 1960, however, and the 42 existing kinescopes (copies, technically) are in storage at UCLA. The Jubilee certainly no longer exists as a chronological series, and I think there is zero chance it will ever be aired again. Since the programs cannot be viewed (and have not been for nearly 50 years), I wonder if the past tense might be more accurate? I recognize this is a somewhat esoteric question, but I am asking in terms of what would give the reader the most accurate information; and to me, saying a program is suggests it may be accessible somewhere for the reader.

I also recognize this is not a really big deal, but I would welcome your thoughts. May I additionally compliment your user page as very nicely-designed?

Thanks for your time. RadioBroadcast (talk) 03:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. RadioBroadcast (talk) 03:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Comment

Hi Pinkadelica, I wanted to discuss your comments about the Wiki article on Taalam Acey. I have tried to address the concerns about general editing and references. I wanted to see if I met the criteria to have the "article clean up" and "citations needed" banners removed. I'm new to Wiki so bear with me.

Respectfully, Cornbreadpoet

Happy holidays!

Best wishes for the holiday season and the upcoming new year!

Wildhartlivie (talk) 19:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

I would like your opinion/support

Hi Pinkadelica. I hope things are going well for you. I wanted you're own opinion in a current situation that has been going on. Currently Beyonce Knowles has Native American categories in which she applies for because she is of native blood which is properly cited. 2 users seem to be persistant on wanting them removed but want the African American categories to stay. I have no problem with either African/Native American categories being there because she is descended from both. I really would like your opinion on this situation see here:[2]. Thank youMcelite (talk) 05:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Miranda decision

Note: Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-12-29/Carmen Miranda ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 11:57, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh joy! Pinkadelica^♣ 15:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Beyonce

Hi Pink, I just saw your comment there, did you see the cat? You seem to support the cats, these are the cats relating to native that she is in at the moment.. Category:Americans of Native American descent Category:Native American actors Category:Native American musicians Category:Native American singers Category:Native American songwriters

Did you see them, do you support them all? Off2riorob (talk) 21:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC) Feel free to delete this and answer there or answer here, either or. Off2riorob (talk) 21:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I support the inclusion of the "Americans of Native American descent" category, but the rest of them I'm having a bit of trouble reconciling. Pinkadelica^♣ 21:57, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes that is my position, there is only one person that wants to keep them and has replaced them a few times and that is the person that created the cats, I would appreciate it if you feel they are excessive if when you have a minite you could clarify that on the talkpage there, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 22:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

All I see is the same discussion I already commented in. Is there another that I should comment in? Pinkadelica^♣ 22:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

No, thats it, it's ok now I know your position, it was just that when I read your comment there I wan unsure of whether you were, for or against. No worries. Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 22:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey

I could use a little help at Talk:Nicole Kidman about her citizenship in the lead. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Do people have nothing better to do lately? Pinkadelica^♣ 23:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Apparently not. They like to ruin one's Christmas with specious sock puppet allegations as well. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

You being accused of being a sock again? You're probably one of the oldest sock masters never to be blocked on WP. Congrats. Pinkadelica^♣ 00:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Yup. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wildhartlivie/Archive for how insane it was. It really did ruin my Christmas and I didn't get the apology I was promised. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

List of chelsea lately episodes

I have create a page for episodes of chelsea lately.Now I need help improving so can you help me and and send this measseage to other users.PAGE:List of Chelsea Lately episodes.--Anesleyp (talk) 03:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

FYI

You should be aware that there is now an official "Conspiracy of bullies" at work, of which, me, User:Vidor, User:Crohnie and LaVidaLoca and certain unnamed administrators were fingered as members in a complaint filed at WP:WQA#User:Wildhartlivie by SkagitRiverQueen was listed, if you are interested. Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:28, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

hello Pinkadelica

Hello Ms. Pinkadelica(great name!) - happy 2010 :) I'm Ryan Alosio. i see that you keep changing my Wikipedia page info. Thanks so much for your energy to get it in shape, i really appreciate it. However, it is very incomplete as to the info i would like for it to contain, and i and my manager keep attempting to add that info, (ie: my imdb bio which my manager wrote i have the rights to) and trying to correct my Date of birth which is listed INCORRECTLY on imdb and MANY othert places on the web as 1973 when it is in fact 1979. as i am not very good at making these Wiki updates/info/picture additions in harmony with your updates and formatting to my wikipedia page, perhaps you could help me to add and correct the info so that it will be most complete and accurate? Would you be willing to help me with this Ms. Pinkadelica? All The Best, Ryan (onegoodmonkey@yahoo.com)

Chelsea Lately

Hi,i do have a problem with your edits.You are taking away important information a wikipedia reader would like to see.It isn't poorly written,i will remove the dead links(which you exaggerated upon saying this is a lot) and i will correct spelling.Also I have added references for the stuff you find "original reasearch".The rest of the stuff you'd have to be a regular viewer of Chelsea Lately.Anymore problems.Once I correct the article the information should stay there.If you have anymore questions please contact me on my talk page.Also I have already requested for the page to be protected.--Anesleyp (talk) 01:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

                THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

Okay I have a question for you,you stated that you have made changes to the article but you have not.You only deleted the important information i've added to Chelsea Lately so if a do revert your edit i'm really still keeping on the version of the article you made.Also if you think the article is crap, how come nobody else(other than an ip or new user) have brought this issue up.It seems you aren't holding a neutral point of view on wikipedia so i suggest you stop editing wikipedia.Also you say there is two sections on Chuy Bravo even though there is only one.And it should be there considering Bravo's page redirects to Chelsea Lately.This redirect is usually to find SOME information on the person,so of course there should be a section to the second most important person of the show.This is also the same with the host section of Chelsea Lately.--Anesleyp (talk) 01:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

                THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

RFC

I feel that mostly anesleyp is right.I think the article should as is.The reason it probably should is because it gives the reader the most information possible.--Racer124 (talk) 02:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm....a "new" user who manages to find an RfC and my talk page on their very first edit? What are the odds? Interesting that you and Anesleyp also don't put spaces between the end of your sentences. Again, what are the odds. Pinkadelica^♣ 02:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh man, I also forgot the two dashes! Quack, quack! Pinkadelica^♣

First off I find it very rude and insulting that you are implieing that i am Anesleyp.The reason i found the RFC after registerd is because i am a fan of MS Handler so i went to the Chelsea Lately show and went to history and saw the edit war between you and Anesleyp.Then I went the talk page and saw the RFC.So I think I'm owed an apoligy for your comment.And i just realized what you meant by two dashes.I don't choose to put dashes at my signiture it happens when i put my sighniture,thank very much.--Racer124 (talk) 03:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't care if you find it rude. I find it rude that you insult my intelligence, but I'm not crying for an apology. Here's a tip - if you want to appear like an unrelated user, try not writing in the same manner or using the same method of signatures. Most editors, let a lone a newbie, also wouldn't comment on the talk page of the user who opened the RfC, they'd comment at the actual RfC. I was actually going to let this go, but since you want to press the issue, I'll open an SPI right quick. Pinkadelica^♣ 03:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

hello Pinkadelica

hello- hope you're well. thanx for your offer of help to get my page formatted correctly, however, since you've taken an interest in editing my page as well, my info has never been correct and just as importantly, up to date and fun to read. i'd like to get my info straight and complete out here. since i dont have a choice in the matter, whats here might as well be the very best it can be. to let you know that im actually who i say i am (ryan alosio), hence the page being titled "Ryan Alosio" so heres some info NO ONE else but me and a couple tv prod people (and you) know yet- i'm going to start shooting a guest star part on 24 next week. i'll be playing the head of a bank. i'll be an old collage friend of Freddy Prinz's it wont be posted up on imbd for a couple of weeks, but it will be updated on actors access before then. also, i asked about , and it was checked into and the bio that is posted on imdb legally belongs to, as far as republishing and usage universally to my manager (psyudonym/ john merrick). imdb only is a "granted usage entity", and we have every right to post it here on my page on this awesome public site of wikipedia or any other site, and would really appreciate your kind help in doing so as you offered, but kindly refrain from judging and telling me that the information that i may choose to share with the world out here may be correct in your opinion which very well may be based on someone elses incorrect information. sorry, but isnt that the truth? nothing personal, you seem very good at running your action on here. however, i figure that since you or anyone else out here, unless we are actually real life friends, doesn't know jack about me other than what you've read off of a computer screen. i understand how that would be quite a handicap, in being the ultimate editing authority for someone ELSE'S life's information, however, since i am very much alive and currently retaining a lucid and somewhat sound mind, i would love to release you from the burden of having to second guess and busy yourself with over editing and leaving the page about me, titled with my name, incomplete (credits and bio) and uninformative. and not fun to read at all... :( (you're suppose to smile there P) this makes me and a few others unhappy, however, it doesn't have to be that way! EVERYONE can have what makes them happy :) me and my peeps will be happy when my bio is left complete, to be updated onto when appropriate, & you could be happy then too... if having my page being correct, up to date, complete, and fun to read, makes you happy! so, this is what i propose. what do ya think, ms. pink? -r —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onegoodmonkey (talk • contribs) 12:32, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

RE JACKIE COOGAN

Hi. Let me explain why John Leslie Coogan, II is preferable and technically accurate, as opposed to John Leslie Coogan, Jr.

As his own bio states: "Jackie Coogan was born in Los Angeles, California, to John Henry Coogan, Jr. (also known as "Big Jack" or "Jack, Sr.") (1886–1935), the son of John Henry Coogan, Sr. (1853–1932), and Lilian Rita Dolliver Coogan (1892––1977, birth also has been listed at 1895)."

Thus, his father was John Henry Coogan Jr., son of John Henry Coogan, Sr. If Jackie Coogan was named for someone (hence the Jr.), it was not his paternal father or grandfather, thus he is not John Leslie Coogan Jr. (he would have been John Henry Coogan III), but rather John Leslie Coogan II.

Please respond on my talk page with any comments you may have.

Thanks. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 19:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

RFC

First of all im not the one with the problem you are.The only reason I removed the tag on Chelsea Lately Talk is because someone has made a comment.So thank you very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anesleyp (talk • contribs) 03:14, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

User: 190fordhouse-Thank you

Thank you so much for you removing that edit and for that honest comment you made in Mariah Carey single, " Honey". 190fordhouse is always making those bad edits on dates for album releases and recording times on so many music pages. I always have to undo their edits and despite my efforts to try communicating with them, they ignore warnings and have continued for months to make far-fetched edits such as the one you corrected. It has been tiring and I'm glad to have help with that. This person also sockpuppets under 2 other profiles. How would I report them to administrators for their intentionally incorrect edits and sockpuppeting?Carmaker1 (talk) 04:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Doesn't change the fact that "was" sounds better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.13.91 (talk) 06:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I didn't imply you did.  :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.13.91 (talk) 06:31, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Supply and Demands

I love it when redlinks make demands. I can make fun of them all day. :) ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 00:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Adding more information on Alexandra_Powers article

Hi! I would like to add to the Alexandra_Powers atricle because I think she grew up in manhanttan because I read on on a website about 5 years ago. Should I add that? Thank you! Neptunekh2 (talk) 03:04, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

So the official Rachel Zoe page on her Bravo website which contines her personal blog isn't reliable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theladfromtheeast (talk • contribs) 13:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Quid pro quo, Clarice

I did, and it would be very helpful if you'd trot on over to Dawn Wells and address this crap content about her "marijuana arrest" and maybe at Black Dahlia, although I haven't yet looked at it to see what is going on. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

This dude has reverted my removal of her arrest, saying "I'm not convinced." I'm taking this (once again) to WP:BLP/N and am going to revert it for due cause. PLEASE comment when you can. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I wouldn't go so far as to say that. The more opinions, the stronger the consensus. Wildhartlivie (talk) 15:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Yay canvassing!—Chowbok ☠ 15:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Stop being a dick and stop stalking my edits and stop being contentious. There was no attempt to sway the opinion of an editor who has weighed in on this before and whose opinion has not changed. There is no attempt to persuade him what to think, there is no excessive cross posting, there is no campaigning, there is no stealth here and there is no disruptive posting or commentary. Just because the majority opinion does not go along with you, there is no need to be contentious about it. And if I didn't say it twice already, STOP STALKING MY EDITS. Wildhartlivie (talk) 16:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Chowbok, keep your stalking/bullshit accusations off my talk page. I've had no interaction with you in the past and I'd very much like to keep it that way. Pinkadelica^♣ 16:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Cash Warren image

You removed this image from the Cash Warren article. How do you know that the man in this image isn't Cash Warren? If it isn't him, then the Jessica Alba article also needs to be fixed because it uses this image as well.-Schnurrbart (talk) 07:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I think the man in the image does look like Cash Warren but like you said the image description does not mention him. Because of this ambiguity, I agree that this image should be removed from the article. Hopefully someone will upload an unambiguous image of Cash Warren that can be used in his article sometime in the future.-Schnurrbart (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

John Reilly (actor)

You seem to have been the one to modify the name of John Reilly's General Hospital character from Donely to Donnelly. [3] IMDb indicates the correct spelling is Donely. What's your source? Robert K S (talk) 21:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

That's fine. It's just that occasionally people use Wikipedia as a source to evidence corrections they suggest for a web site that I help run. And then I'm tasked with tracing the error back in order to disprove it. Cheers, Robert K S (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

I just wanted to extend, on your talk page, my sincere apology for my edit summary when reverting your revert of my change of the tense. While I remain unconvinced that the current policy is the best one, it doesn't excuse the fact that I did not double check my facts before I called you out in my summary. I've tried to make amends, and I'm following your wisely suggested course of engaging in discussion on the matter. Thanks for the lesson in civility. 65.80.247.100 (talk) 01:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Family affair

Sorry, I did not check before reverting, but did add to the discussion, so I stand behind the reversion, albeit retroactively.Njsustain (talk) 18:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Caryn Ward

Most, if not all, actors/actresses have an IMDB profile from where you can get their list of acting credits. There wouldn't be so many pages that listed them. I was also in the middle of edits when you sent yet another message. The race of the actress and unofficial links were being taken out. As for the list of acting credits, they provide much more information than the edit of the unregistered user.

- Silver Buizel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silver Buizel (talk • contribs) 01:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Would you mind clarifying what you mean? I'm not sure what could possibly be more official than the actress's site when it comes to content. After all, it is not an unofficial site, but completely endorsed by the actress herself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silver Buizel (talk • contribs) 01:40, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for informing me about the rules, something I'm not too familiar with. And yes, I have searched for different sources on the internet, but only IMDB and her official website provide any substantial information, hence the reason it is the primary, and only other source. Otherwise, I would've provided other sources. I apologize if it looks as if I came off snappy in any of the earlier comments. Your feedback is much appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silver Buizel (talk • contribs) 02:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the assistance with the article. I do wonder, if you're unable to find any other sources, will we be able to add some of the previous material back to the article? Silver Buizel (talk) 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Re: EInsiders.com sources

Pinkadelica, please cite examples of your last point, that "in some cases, no additional sources can be found or else I would've cited something else." This would be very helpful to your point, and to the discussion here. There has been substantive discussion about the reliability of EInsiders as a source. Any editor is free to contest and remove unreferenced information in any article -- which leads me to believe that if there is no other source for information besides an unreliable source, then perhaps the information doesn't belong in the article. 842U (talk) 05:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I was asked to provide as much information as I could on who, what, where and how EInsiders publishes information so these particular Wiki editors could "determine" if EInsiders meets the Wiki guidelines. What did I get for going out and accumulating the info? Well, they used it to say that I now know "too much" about EInsiders and there just "must be" a conflict of interest. See? Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Unfortunately for them, I don't think they realized that there is almost 10 years of obits that will have to be deleted off Wiki because of their personal vendetta against EInsiders including .jpgs of the deceased that were taken from EInsider's website. Also, 842U, you say that "perhaps the info doesn't belong in the "article." Well, without EInsiders, there would NOT BE an article. What a disservice you are doing to the family of those who have died. Those articles are going to be gone.Pharaway (talk) 23:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

"Well, without EInsiders, there would NOT BE an article." What you meant to say, I suspect, is that "without EInsiders, there wouldn't be a Wikipedia article." Which is fine, because Wikipedia, unlike EIsiders.com, isn't in the business of regurgitating the obituaries of dead celebrities. That said, I suspect the family of Pernell Roberts could care less.

EInsiders does not transparently, for all to understand, describe it's process of creating obituaries, it doesn't describe its staff, its credentials, its facilities, its history, its anything. We know it doesn't magically appear at every celebrity death to transcribe the information — that would be like the Santa Claus of Death. It gets its information somewhere — and just doesn't say where it gets it from. So like the theoretically problematic photo information you've fretted over, I suspect that some poor soul at EInsiders sifts through the ancient public domain obituaries of dead celebrities, repackages them, and spits them out. Or in the case of a currently dead celebrity, Pernell Roberts, for example, they pull a few bits of information off a current wire feed, throw in the breezy, blithe reminiscenses of a... just, say... Kathy, Jonathan or David, and send them out. They ain't painting the Sistine Chapel, that's for sure. And low and behold, we can all sleep knowing the original information about the dead celebrity still exists... with reliable sources.842U (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Wilson phillips 2004.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wilson phillips 2004.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:34, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Razzies

Nope, no Razzies. The only it should be in the article is if for some reason, like Halle Berry, the nominee or recipient decides to play along with the joke and attends. Neither do we add templates for Razzie Awards per discussion and noted on the WP:ACTOR main page. Wildhartlivie (talk) 13:18, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Greatest Hits Album.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Greatest Hits Album.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 20:31, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Link to Awards

I was just browsing through some user pages when I came to yours, and I saw that you picture link to you awards page was wrong. Change the link to [[User:Pinkadelica/Awards]]. It is (right now) [[Pinkadelica/Awards]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by IceMarioman (talk • contribs) 01:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Camera setup in Infoboxes

In regard to the mention that "Film" should be in the picture format section on Infobox Television; technically, it should be applicable to the camera setup section as the use of "Film" or "Videotape" next to the words "Multi-camera" or "Single-camera" refers to what type of camera is used to shoot the program based on the recordable product it uses, and therefore what it is shot on either videotape or film. The picture format section should generally refer to the screen resolution (480i, 720p, 1080i, etc.) and picture size (4:3, 16:9, etc.), not really what type of camera is used to shoot a particular program. Tvtonightokc (talk) 07:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Valeska Suratt

Pinkadelica, thanks for that linkage of University of Washington content on Valeska. I couldnt get the whole URL out of the location bar to it's complete configuration, so I set up the link to where users just type her name in on the University's front page which had a shorter URL. Glad to see you linked directly as I was originally trying to do. Thanks again.(by the way, are you related to Valeska?) Koplimek (talk) 20:30, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Saturday Supercade-response

I can't handle your idea since some of the voices in the episodes shown on YouTube aren't familiar to me? Rtkat3 (talk) 10:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI

Hi, I feel you have the right to know that you are being mentioned here. Happy editing, --CrohnieGal^Talk 21:44, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't know if you have me on your watchlist so I am just letting you know that I have responded to you there. Thanks, --CrohnieGal^Talk 12:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Magic Bullet

I did the magic bullet hopefully making the article more correct.

Are you a soap opera fan? Did I already ask you that?

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.191.138.12 (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Magic Bullet #2/Sources

So if I found reliable sources on the Magic Bullet that shows how it doesn't work that well as advertised, I could put that on right.

What about a video of the infomercial?

Pinkadelica, haven't you ever seen the infomercial of the Magic Bullet? Since you're a wikipedia administrator couldn't you add in my stuff? If you watch the commercial on BNN at 12Midnight on weekends, you'll see everything about the infomercial I've been talking about is correct. Give it a try, please!!!

Can I source what companies supply this product which will provide more info? I'm not trying to advertise.

PLEASE ANSWER EACH QUESTION I ASKED HERE TO YOUR FULL ABILITY! THANKS!.

P.S.: Also do you know how I can leave a message on Rocksey's page? I can't find her "please leave me a message link here". I'd appreciate it.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.191.138.12 (talk) 00:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

The Game

I don't know anything about that show, but I generally revert anything that looks funky, including additions to the cast list. Just sayin'. And I LIKE your cavalier attitude! Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:43, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

You know, after the debacle with Lil Kunta (who incidentally had an account here and is blocked), I don't even like the stupid show anymore. I was rooting for it to get picked up but now I couldn't care less. I'm not even going to fight the lame ass source that's currently presented. Some people are just bound and determined to make this site TV Guide for some reason. Pinkadelica^♣ 00:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Ya know, I just had a thought....if we're the same person, why are we talking to each other on talk pages? Is that the first sign of schizophrenia? Pinkadelica^♣ 00:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't know either. I don't talk to myself, I save that for my cats, who are NOT offering any sound advice on how to fix or replace my mouse. One of them caught one last night, but that's no help. I can't even afford to buy one, so I'm hoping my friend's son will have a spare one like he did a spare keyboard when my old one bit the dust. The problem is that the left-click button won't work. ARGH!!! Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:31, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Ugh. I'm already over The Game article as the idiocy is already starting up. I so wish Twitter were a blacklisted link. In what wacky universe are social networking cites considered a reliable source? Pinkadelica^♣ 01:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

re: Truth

Noooooo, I'm stumped!?!?! Heheeeee. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Don't Forget Your Toothbrush

• But neither of the things you have asked me to read say anything of the sort. Please find something that actually lays down what you want. Personally, I couldn't care less: I just like good English, which normally requires that when writing about something that has happened in the past, one uses the past tense. Emeraude (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

• • Apologies - the link was imprecise when I full-screened and the page shifted to an irrelevant topic. Works OK if I don't resize. Emeraude (talk) 12:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

The Donna Reed Show

Dear Pinkadelica,

The only contributions I have made to Wikipedia are the one's concerning "The Donna Reed Show."

Greg2356 (talk) 17:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Jack Kelly

You actually don't think the fact that Kelly's sister was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Actress should be mentioned in an article about him? One of the most interesting and talked-about facets of Kelly's life was the fact that he found himself placed into competition with a phenomenally popular star at the beginning of what amounted at the time to a national craze (James Garner) eight shows into the series and was roundly overshadowed, and that he'd already spent his life in the shadow of his older sister Nancy, who'd been leading lady in top-drawer movies in the 1930s and was nominated for an Oscar the year before "Maverick" began production. To simply omit any reference to this whatsoever seems irresponsible, bordering on vandalism. As for including some detail about "Maverick" in an article about Kelly, it was not only his professional height but the only reason he's noticed at all today, to the paltry extent that he is--if "Maverick" had never been filmed, you'd doubtless be challenging the existence of any article about Kelly on the grounds that he lacks the importance to merit one. Wikichump (talk) 11:00, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Raymond Burr

Thanks for doing the Burr filmography. I hate doing tables.--Ishtar456 (talk) 01:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

It is easy to procrastinate on this one. There is so much that was "cut and pasted" from other un-cited sources, it really isn't funny. I think I cut the article in half just getting rid of the stuff that could not be cited. I guess I'm going to have to write some new material now to replace it. It is easier to put the citations in as you write it though, than it is for someone to try to go back and do it later, so I guess that what I will do.;0)--Ishtar456 (talk) 02:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Question about endash

What's the difference between "& ndash" and the "-"? I don't see a difference or a problem with it just being "-". Ziva David (talk) 23:58, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for helping with the info on why you use "mdash". Hope you are having a good easter :). Ziva David (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

How are you doing today.

QuasyBoy has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

QuasyBoy 19:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

The Game (U.S. TV series) *

Thank you for this. That IP has a lengthy history of not adhering to policy, especially the WP:RS. They only start to respond when the article they're warring on gets protection. Anyhow, thanks again. It can get tiresome defending that article :) Pinkadelica^♣ 01:02, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Don't worry, whenever you want. And if semi-protection don't stop him always have the option of this templates. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 01:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

On the article's talk page, I think I understand why that recent addition was intially reverted, (it might have looked like they were trying to use the talk page to host their own version of the article or something, or using it as some sort of forum) but in the future, please don't revert it unless it is an obvious violation of WP:Talk. I'm trying to get the IPs invovled to use the talk page, and they're saying "We tried, but Pinkadelica reverted us..." I think what they were trying to do was to show what they wanted to be put in the article along with their sources. I work at WP:RFPP quite a bit, and understand that many of these articles about TV shows and albums and so on can get crazy, but for future reference or whatever, at least in that case, please don't revert talk page posts like that. AlexiusHoratius 18:05, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay, withdrawn. Also see my reply on my talk page, if you haven't already. AlexiusHoratius 04:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

T.I.

Hey Pinkadelica. First of coarse I don't have a problem with the African American categories it's just the simple fact that any racial group has to have a citation. You should know that I honestly don't care if he had Hawaiian in his family it needs to be cited. There are so many articles that have this issue but I don't have the time to address them and I know a number of editors would get pissed. Have a great day.Mcelite (talk) 00:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Alec Baldwin: SNL Appearance with Sarah Palin (Political Views)

When you have time would you take a look at the Alec Baldwin talk page and review a dispute I am having on a contribution? You have contributed to the page in the past two years and I would like you to look over the contribution and give your thoughts on it. Regards, MirelesJ (talk) 05:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Recommend blocking?

The IP address 98.225.234.245 won't stop putting the info on "That Christmas Feeling" on the Simon Birch page when it is a 2009 song, not from 10 years ago. I've reverted it 3 times in 5 days and it won't stop placing it back on and you are the last one to undo it. Can you get an admin to block the address to stop excessive vandalism? Leave me a message when the IP address gets blocked or has been warned. My IP is 69.228.89.220, by the way. Thanks! 69.228.89.220 (talk) 21:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

SPI

If you know that these IPs are socks of a banned user, could you tell me which user? I'd like to open an WP:SPI case so we can have this dealt with. Thanks. Equazcion ^(talk) 21:08, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

• See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IP-hopping_user_making_trouble. Equazcion ^(talk) 21:18, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

It's probably User:Lilkunta. Blocking is rather futile which is why Wild and I revert and then ask for page protection. This ain't our first rodeo with this clown and as you can see, they continue to add poorly written content back because now they think they have a buddy to back them up. Pinkadelica^♣ 21:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Living Lohan

I'll leave the song infobox there until she does have a article for her music, since you have a point there. I don't see other TV shows with song infoxboxes (After all, I did create the article in the first place), but since I take it that you and Kww supposedly might be Ali Lohan fans, we can make a exception and i'll make a suggestion to Wikipedia:WikiProject Television about the dispute. (talk) 3:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

I want to apologize to both you and Kww if I offended both of you. Either way, after posting this issue at WikiProject Television's talk page, it looks like that the song infobox will end up being deleted anyway because the image in said infobox is a failure of WP:FUC and WP:NONFREE, and it looks like that it could happen anyway regardless of who is posting or editing. (talk) 6:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Dooyar is back

Wanna take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nyannrunning and add a comment? Wildhartlivie (talk)

Looks like you got everything covered. Why some folks want to participate in a website that doesn't want them is beyond me. Pinkadelica^♣ 01:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I didn't think I had a lot to base it on, except that I can smell a Dooyar at 500 paces. Maybe just say you support the accusation? Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

My HTML comments in Dana Plato

I do not know why you reverted my comments, although I understand that the image of Dana Plato is free. I do not mean to insult you, as I reverted back into re-inserting them; however, to me a more recent, appropiate free photo of this person is more preferable because age of this person matters more importantly. I do not want to move on thinking of that young Dana Plato. As for the photo, what year was the photo taken place? --Gh87 (talk) 22:16, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:English-language television series

I'm helping you out by adding the category, If you don't mind. :) QuasyBoy (talk) 22:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Cool :) QuasyBoy (talk) 22:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

98.225.234.245

This user has been blocked indenfintely on the Phineas and Ferb Wiki for vandalism on the "Got this Christmas Feeling" page, which is the same song the user is placing on the Simon Birch for about 2 months now, and has been reverted each time. Do you think this user by an admin should be blocked indenfintely for being a vandal since it started to edit pages? Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 02:26, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

The Game (U.S. TV series)

I have seen the episode in question several times. I do not agree that the possibility of the two series disconnecting themselves is automatically negated by the fact that the line in question was a joke -- particularly since there was no reference to Joan or anyone else from Girlfriends in any episode of The Game after the former series' cancellation. Nevertheless, I don't think it's worth quibbling over, so I'll let things be. ABCxyz (talk) 17:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Edie Sedgwick

You are being very rude. I was trying to make the page simple, clear, and concise. Having the marriage template does not matter as long as the information is there and it is clear. Seeing how the marriage of Edie Sedgwick and Michael Post lasted only four months of the year 1971; "1971-1971" a.k.a "Married from the year 1971 to 1971" is confusing and it does not project the reason for this short union (Sedgwick's death). 1971 and 1971 are NOT two separate years and so, the marriage template does not work in this case. The marriage template works in most cases; not in this one. If you'd be happy to, I would gladly send this conflict to the Wikipedia contact department and have THEM decide who is correct- as I see that you will not agree with me, as I will not agree with you.

P.S: Putting the page under protection would not be beneficial to anyone but yourself. Others, not including you or I, would love to contribute fresh and new information they may have about Edie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.29.81.143 (talk) 06:28, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Party

Thank you so much for removing the comments that my party guests have obviously been submitting via my personal computer. I apologize for any inconvenience! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.115.101 (talk) 08:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Possible socks

Remember me? I saw 76.99.214.222, 68.81.49.201, and 98.225.213.148 made edits that were very similar to 98.225.234.245's edits on Simon Birch. I'm think 98.225.234.245 was evading from their block placed last month by using different IP addresses. Let me know when you get back from vacation! Isabella and Lego Liker _{Whatcha doin'?} 01:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, with Pinkadelica on break please take this to Materialscientist. The reason I suggest this is because the IP you have there that starts with 68 was blocked for ban evasion. Let this administrator check things out please. Just a friendly suggestion from a complete stranger. :) --CrohnieGal^Talk 17:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tatumonealoscar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tatumonealoscar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7