User talk:MopTop/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about User:MopTop. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
TWL HighBeam check-in
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,
You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
- Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
- Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
- Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you. 20:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to the Hall of Fame!
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Thank you for supporting our editathons
There were over 350 articles on Women in Entertainment, 55 on Jewish Women's History and 50 on Women in LGBTQ
Our next event: Women in Halls of Fame |
--Ipigott (talk) 16:29, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project
Please join us... | |
---|---|
Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) via MassMessage 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Indigenous women & Polar women editathons
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Indigenous women editathon & Polar women editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Orphaned non-free image File:Rabbi with Torah by Hyman Bloom, 1980s.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rabbi with Torah by Hyman Bloom, 1980s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Seance by Hyman Bloom, 1954.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Seance by Hyman Bloom, 1954.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Upcoming editathons: Women in Nursing & Women Labor Activists
You are invited... | |
---|---|
Women in Nursing editathon & Women Labor Activists editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Frances Sweeney at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Little Mary Sunshine (1916 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Just want to say I'm glad you haven't disappeared. Though we don't talk a lot, it makes me feel good to know you are around. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Rosiestep: Aw, thanks, and back atcha! That's especially nice to hear from an amazing Wikipedian like yourself. MopTop (talk) 04:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello
I saw your edit on an article I wrote and noticed on your user page that we have a number of shared interests (notable women, overlooked people, semicolons, Boston) so I thought I'd say hello. I've been enjoying a browse through your articles. Cheers, Alafarge (talk) 16:20, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheryl Linn Glass, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Rose Finkelstein Norwood
On 21 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rose Finkelstein Norwood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1919, Rose Finkelstein Norwood helped lead 8,000 switchboard operators in a six-day strike that paralyzed telephone service throughout New England? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rose Finkelstein Norwood. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rose Finkelstein Norwood), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Frances Sweeney
On 23 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frances Sweeney, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Frances Sweeney conceived the idea for the Boston Herald Rumor Clinic during World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frances Sweeney. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Frances Sweeney), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Invitation to Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your userboxes
Hey there. I've just noticed and updated the link to one of your userboxes which I use since it went red. Via whatlinkshere, I further updated its links in few other editors and the main one at the gallery. Since you have more, just thought you'd like to know. Good day, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 20:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Ugog Nizdast: Thanks for letting me know. Will try to fix it. MopTop (talk) 21:10, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Could you please review my DYK for the article about Rock-Olga. If approved it could appear tomorrow on the DYK. If you find time for it please review.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- If you feel like it, you could also take a look at Helene Ripa. Any improvements are welcomed.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Bryn Mawr Summer School for Women Workers in Industry
On 27 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bryn Mawr Summer School for Women Workers in Industry, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that guest lecturers at the Bryn Mawr Summer School for Women Workers in Industry (students pictured) included W. E. B. Du Bois, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Margaret Sanger? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bryn Mawr Summer School for Women Workers in Industry. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bryn Mawr Summer School for Women Workers in Industry), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Sullivan (general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evacuation Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
An invitation to November's events
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Reference errors on 30 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Vida Dutton Scudder page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 02:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
--Cameron11598 (Talk) 02:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
DYK for Denison House (Boston)
On 12 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Denison House (Boston), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before she became a famous aviator, Amelia Earhart was a social worker at Denison House in Boston? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Denison House (Boston). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Denison House (Boston)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, MopTop. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Abigail Adams Eliot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Abigail Adams Eliot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Your Newspapers.com account is now active. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 01:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Cameron11598: Wonderful, thanks! --MopTop (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
January 2017 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy 2017!
Wishing good health and happiness as we start the new year! --Rosiestep (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Rosiestep: Same to you, and thanks for all your good work on Wikipedia. --MopTop (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Mind the Gap Award | ||
I don't just like that you restored the history of the New England School of Law, I love that you discovered that women were left out of that history, even though they were an integral part of its founding! Writing women back into the history is just as important as blazing new trails. Thank you. SusunW (talk) 02:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC) |
Some baklava for you!
I liked your work and we tweeted it. Thanks Victuallers (talk) 13:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC) |
Autopatrolled
Hi MopTop, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! v/r - TP 05:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
- @TParis: Thanks! --MopTop (talk) 05:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
February 2017 at Women in Red
| |
---|---|
Black Women & Women Anthropologists online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Candace award
Hello, a friend of mine was working on your Candace Award page to copy the data to Wikidata and noticed that it just stops in 1992, but this shows it is still going strong in NJ? Looks like it made a restart in 2003 or something, or maybe it is run as a chapter thing of the NCBW now. In any case, he blogged about it here so maybe you can enlighten him? Thanks for making the list btw. Jane (talk) 09:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Jane023: Thanks. I tried emailing the organization when I first created the page, but I never heard back. The award appears to be given by local chapters now, and I don't think they have the big awards ceremony at the Met anymore, but I didn't want to say more without being sure. --MopTop (talk) 12:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Well he said he mailed NCBW too. It's really too bad that things like this are so hard to track down - they probably lost a sponsor. I wonder if someone at the MET knows more? They at least have a more responsive inquiries desk. Jane (talk) 12:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Jane023: If you learn anything more, please don't hesitate to update the article. Not that I'm unwilling to do any more work on it, but I'm kind of engrossed in something else at the moment. I agree it would be great to have a list of more recent award recipients, which would no doubt include some very interesting and notable people who aren't yet mentioned in Wikipedia. --MopTop (talk) 13:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Well he said he mailed NCBW too. It's really too bad that things like this are so hard to track down - they probably lost a sponsor. I wonder if someone at the MET knows more? They at least have a more responsive inquiries desk. Jane (talk) 12:34, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to... Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
DYK for Knowles Riot
On 28 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Knowles Riot, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that during the Knowles Riot of 1747, Bostonians put the sheriff's deputy in the stocks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Knowles Riot. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Knowles Riot), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Montgomery Guards
On 9 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Montgomery Guards, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1837, nativist rioters in Boston attacked the Montgomery Guards, an Irish-American militia company? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Montgomery Guards. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Montgomery Guards), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of African Americans in Boston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Latimer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samuel Edmund Sewall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Latimer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
April events at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ----Rosiestep (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Abolition Riot of 1836
On 5 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abolition Riot of 1836, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two women captured in Boston under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 were rescued during the Abolition Riot of 1836? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abolition Riot of 1836. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Abolition Riot of 1836), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rose M. M. Pitman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil May. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Precious two years!
Two years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
May 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2017 offerings @ WikiProject Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's June 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A page you started (Joe Overstreet) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Joe Overstreet, MopTop!
Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Mduvekot (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
July 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's July 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red's new initiative: 1day1woman
Women in Red is pleased to introduce... A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: 1day1woman | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 03:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
August 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's August 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --
A new WiR initiative starting in August
Introducing... WiR's new initaitve: 1day1woman for worldwide online coverage Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC) |
September 2017 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's September 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Massachusetts Convention of 1768 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Categorization
It actually came up under another discussion on the page, but thanks for pointing me in that direction.
And don't worry - categorization confuses me as well. As much as the next guy...or more, even. :-)
Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Massachusetts Convention of Towns
On 24 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Massachusetts Convention of Towns, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Massachusetts Convention of Towns in 1768 created a war scare, causing prices to drop on the London Stock Exchange? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Massachusetts Convention of Towns. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Massachusetts Convention of Towns), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red October editathon invitation
Welcome to Women in Red's October 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Ellen Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to New Yorker
- Helen Barolini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to New Yorker
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mari Tomasi.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mari Tomasi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!
Welcome to Women in Red's November 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WiR December highlights
Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 13:06, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, MopTop. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!
Welcome to Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red
It's great to see you've finally become a member of WiR after all the interesting biographies you've been writing. Let me know if ever you run into any problems or need any help. All the best for 2017!--Ipigott (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Feburary 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.
New:
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Add pageant winners to notability guidelines?
Hello, I saw that you were a part of Women in Red and I hope you don't mind me asking a question. I believe that pageant winners are notable people, but unlike sports players I feel they're often considered "not important" enough, even though pageants are extremely important to a large part of the population, including mostly women. I was wondering if you knew of a way to get pageant winners added to Wikipedia's official notability guidelines? That way you don't end up with situations like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cherise_Haugen
In any case, I appreciate all the work you do, and I understand you must be very busy and may not have time to respond. Have a great day :) Lonehexagon (talk) 18:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Lonehexagon: I agree, but I have no idea how to get something added to the guidelines, sorry! I tend to stick to content creation and don't know much about the administrative side of things. --MopTop (talk) 03:19, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- Me too. I really appreciate the response. Have a great week :) Lonehexagon (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
The article Luwanda Jenkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not notable. Candidate for political office, fails WP:POLITICIAN. Sources provided fail WP:GNG. WP:TOOSOON.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Luwanda Jenkins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luwanda Jenkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luwanda Jenkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Marie Newman
Being a candidate in an upcoming primary election is not a notability claim at all — even being the winning primary candidate who goes into the general election is still far from a notability guarantee, but being a candidate in a primary counts for exactly nothing whatsoever toward notability — and being head of a national organization is not a notability freebie in the absence of enough reliable source coverage about that to clear WP:GNG for it (mentions of it as background in the expected candidacy coverage is not enough.)
But at any rate, it doesn't matter what I think personally: the AFD concluded with a consensus to redirect her to the election article, which means that she has to stay that way unless and until you can do a significantly better job of writing and sourcing significantly more notability than the first version showed. For example, if she wins the election in November, the AFD will obviously be voided at that point since her notability claim will have changed to one that automatically guarantees the right to a Wikipedia article. But you can't just immediately ignore the AFD result and recreate the same article, with the same notability claim and the same or less sourcing as the first time — the AFD result is final until somebody can do significantly better than the first version. Not because I said so, but because that's how AFD works: it's the last word until something changes. And simply adding her middle initial to the title, so as to avoid the original page's title, is not a valid dodge to an AFD result either — that kind of editing behaviour can actually get a person blocked for disruption if they keep trying it.
If you really think you can do better now, then you're more than welcome to work on it in draftspace or your own sandbox — but once AFD has deemed the first version redirectable or deletable, a followup attempt does have to be a better article, with a stronger notability claim and more sourcing for it, before it can be restored to the main articlespace. Bearcat (talk) 17:30, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Like I said, SHE WAS NOTABLE BEFORE SHE WAS A CANDIDATE. --MopTop (talk) 17:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- Then you need to reliably source that fact better than you did. To demonstrate that she was already notable for leading a national organization before becoming a primary candidate, you need to show sources which demonstrate that she was already getting media coverage in that context — sourcing her prior career to mentions of it as background in the candidacy coverage does not constitute evidence that she was notable for the prior career, because every candidate's campaign-related coverage is always going to mention their prior career background. To demonstrate that she was already notable for that work before becoming a candidate, you need to show sources which were already covering her in that context before becoming a candidate — but the only non-candidacy source in your version of the article was a piece of her own writing, not coverage about her.
- Again, you're more than welcome to work on it in draftspace or your own user sandbox if you need time to get it up to scratch. But your version was not showing the kind of sourcing it would take to deem her already notable for other reasons, because the article was not referenced to the kind of sources it would take to show that she was already notable — it was still referenced to candidacy-related sources, not to preexisting sources that showed a preexisting GNG pass for Team Up to Stop Bullying per se. Bearcat (talk) 18:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
- So I went to investigate this deletion without consultation and found this. And then I came to post this on your talk page and found a long discussion above from another editor. I know that Twitter gives only short messages but you said that two out of three were deleted. Actually it was one. You said deleted "summarily deleted without discussion" ... and then I find the discussion. You may be feeling that you are being treated unfairly. Me too. Victuallers (talk) 23:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Please note, as well, that every deletion or redirection does not always automatically require a new followup rediscussion. If a recreated article does not adequately address the reason why the first discussion was closed the way it was, then the result of the original discussion automatically reapplies without needing a new discussion to be conducted first. To override or overrule the first discussion, you do need to show a stronger claim of notability, and stronger sourcing for it, than was present in the first version — until that's done, there's no requirement to rediscuss the new version again if nothing about it actually represents an improvement over the first one. I've already pointed out several times that you can work on the article in draftspace or your own user sandbox if you need time to make it better — but until it's better than the first version, we don't have to rediscuss it before treating it the same way we treated the first version. You may think it's unfair, but it is one of our rules that if the recreated article isn't better than the first one, then nobody owes you a new discussion before the new version can be deleted or redirected again — your version would have to be better than the first one was before it could be either kept or rediscussed if people still weren't convinced. It's not fair to everybody else to have to spend time individually rediscussing every attempt to recreate a previously deleted or redirected article — so fair or not, our rule is that the first AFD result still automatically reapplies, with no new rediscussion required, until such time as the recreated article is better, making a stronger notability claim and citing better sourcing for it, than the first version was. Bearcat (talk) 19:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:American politicians of Italian descent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 01:06, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Renato Mariotti for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renato Mariotti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato Mariotti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- The only effective ways to contest this is to bring SIGCOV of Mariotti's career that predates September 2017. Some of the legal cases he prosecuted appear to be notable, such as the case against Michael Coscia (Spoofing (finance)#Milestone case against spoofing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
Precious three years!
Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 20:49, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Eclipse by Joe Overstreet, 2002.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eclipse by Joe Overstreet, 2002.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bronze plaque on sidewalk marking the spot where the Liberty Tree once stood.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bronze plaque on sidewalk marking the spot where the Liberty Tree once stood.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons
Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2018
I don't know how, but in your many years of editing you apparently managed to never see WP:CIVIL. More unprovoked nastiness from you, like this, and I'll see you promptly at ANI. I have no tolerance for that sort of thing. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
Hello again from Women in Red!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
August 2018 at Women in Red
An exciting new month for Women in Red!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Heritage Trail
File:Boston Irish Heritage Trail.jpg was uploaded here by user:Boston Irish Heritage who claimed it as their work. It was then uploaded to the Commons by you, MopTop who claimed it as your work. If you are two different people, there is some explaining needed.
I have merged the histories of two versions into Draft:Boston Irish Heritage Trail. It has potential as an article so feel free to work on it but take careful note about the CoI and paid editing disclosures that you must make - see the top of User talk:Boston Irish Heritage. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 at Women in Red
September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
October 2018 at Women in Red
Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, MopTop. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M. A. Griffiths, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rattle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
January 2019 at Women in Red
January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108
January events:
|
February 2019 at Women in Red
February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111
February events:
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Maria W. Stewart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Maria W. Stewart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
March 2019 at Women in Red
March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
April 2019
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
Precious anniversary
Four years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:50, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domestic violence in Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chechen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
June events with WIR
June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
List of Puerto Ricans
Hi Moptop, hope everything is well with you, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia. The name which you added to the list has been removed for the following reason: "As of 2008, each addition to the list must also provide a reliable verifiable source which cites the person's notability and/or the person's link to Puerto Rico, otherwise the name will be removed.". Feel free to add it once more with the required sources. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
July events from Women in Red!
July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Picture of Tina DeRosa
Good morning from Caselle Landi, dear MopTop, how are you?
I see that you uploaded this picture, but it's copyrighted. Is it possible to put in Commons, so we will put in others Wikipedias?
Thanks a lot for your reply, sincerely
Rei Momo (talk) 11:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Socialist Woman
Hi there. We're running up individual issues of The Socialist Woman on Marxists Internet Archive and will be using your WP piece in full or in part as the intro for that. I was wondering if you would like to be credited by name for this; if not, not a problem at all. If so, drop me a line ShoeHutch@gmail.com Thanks for your work for Wikipedia! —Tim Davenport /// Carrite (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Link All the best, -t /// Carrite (talk) 01:30, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019 at Women in Red
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nancy Navarro
Hi MopTop. I think we got off on the wrong foot and part of that was my fault. The article you just recreated was recently deleted by me following a community discussion at WP:AfD. Another editor wanted me to undelete the article and move it as a draft to their user space, which I resisted because I agreed with the clear consensus in the discussion, namely that Ms. Navarro does not pass our guidelines for inclusion in the encyclopedia. After a great deal of back and forth another admin agreed to the request with conditions attached that I mentioned on the talk page. When I suddenly saw the article recreated w/o any discussion, well I was I was seriously ticked off. Following our discussion it is clear to me that you were unaware of any of this and were not intentionally attempting to flout the AfD discussion or the conditions under which it was userfied, and I regret my intemperate language. That said, I'm afriad the article does not correct any of the issues raised and discussed at AfD. If you wish to review our notability guidelines, the two that are relevant are WP:BASIC and WP:NPOL. If you have any questions please feel free to ping me or drop a line on my talk page. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
October Events from Women in Red
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
December events with WIR
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Nicholas Russo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nicholas Russo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Dear MopTop,
I'm a daily if not hourly Wikipedia user, but don't know what ra Barnstars is. Anyway -- your edit to the Barbara Rubin page contains information that I don't think is found anywhere else, and intrigues me beyond reckoning. To be specific, because I can see you have edited a lot of pages, the information that Barbara Gladstone appeared in Christmas on Earth is huge to me. I'm a researcher working on Steve Dwoskin, a New York-born underground filmmaker who for sure crossed paths with Barbara Rubin, and who, ~five~ years later, made a film in London with a Martha Graham-trained dancer called Barbara Gladstone. It must be her. It must! I don't believe Gerard Malanga has said this anywhere else. Did he say anything more? Do you know anything about her? Could you email me under your government name so I can cite you? Best wishes, Henry (h.k.miller@reading.ac.uk) Walter C Mycroft (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2020 (UTC) |
February with Women in Red
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
Five years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Paper Fish by Tina DeRosa, 2003 edition cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Paper Fish by Tina DeRosa, 2003 edition cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Umbertina by Helen Barolini, 1999 edition cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Umbertina by Helen Barolini, 1999 edition cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
December with Women in Red
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Josephine Conger-Kaneko.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Josephine Conger-Kaneko.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
Six years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Firehose of falsehood for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firehose of falsehood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
TFD (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, for fuck's sake, fuck you, you toxic little creeps. Why not delete all my articles and get it over with! But I'm going to edit my preferences so I don't even get notified anymore when you do it. Sorry to deny you the satisfaction. Assholes. --MopTop (talk) 07:39, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
I miss seeing you around. I hope things are okay. Rosiestep (talk) 05:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) |
November 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
December 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Theodora W. Youmans.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Theodora W. Youmans.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 with Women in Red
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article The Neighborhoods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Seven years! |
---|
Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2023
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Dorothy Adlow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dorothy Adlow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Ernestina Cravello 1900.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ernestina Cravello 1900.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Eight years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of List of Italian-American television characters for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Italian-American television characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Dronebogus (talk) 09:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2023
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women in Red
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Evans Wilson.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mary Evans Wilson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Grace Quackenbos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mary Grace Quackenbos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging