Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Rose Finkelstein Norwood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Rose Finkelstein Norwood

[edit]

Created by MopTop (talk). Self-nominated at 01:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 23:17, 01 September 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 6021 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 29.6% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected
    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 180 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 151 characters
    • MopTop has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Syster Sol was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 02:14, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

  • New enough and long enough with no problems in terms of policy that I can see. The copyvio mentioned by the bot looks to be negligible, coming from names of organizations. QPQ complete. My preference is for ALT1, and it is indeed present and sourced in the article. I wish we had an image from the strike or a clearer portrait, but it's a nice article and a good hook. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 00:56, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Why is ALT0 interesting? EEng 19:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Does that help? Not sure what the point of your question is, other than to be rude. MopTop (talk) 22:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
MopTop, try not to take EEng's comment personally. I'm sure it is intended as constructive criticism. If you want your hook to make it onto the front page, you have to expect others to comment. By the way, I happen to agree with EEng - there's nothing particularly remarkable about a white person being on the board of a black organisation, either in 1942 or today. ALT1 is a much more interesting hook. Edwardx (talk) 23:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I will strive to be Little Mary Sunshine from now on. MopTop (talk) 04:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Summary of this thread: Consensus for ALT1. Safe to promote accordingly. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 13:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)