User talk:Matthewedwards/Archives/2012/03
|
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WikiCup 2012 February newsletter
[edit]
Round 1 is already over! The 64 highest scorers have progressed to round 2. Our highest scorer was 
Grapple X (submissions), again thanks mostly to a swathe of good articles on The X-Files. In second place was 
Tigerboy1966 (submissions), thanks an impressive list of did you knows about racehorses. Both scored over 400 points. Following behind with over 300 points were 
Ruby2010 (submissions), 
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 
Miyagawa (submissions) and 
Casliber (submissions). February also saw the competition's first featured list: List of colleges and universities in North Dakota, from Ruby2010 (submissions). At the other end of the scale, 11 points was enough to secure a place in this round, and some contestants with 10 points made it into the round on a tiebreaker. This is higher than the 8 points that were needed last year, but lower than the 20 points required the year before. The number of points required to progress to round 3 will be significantly higher.
The remaining contestants have been split into 8 pools of 8, named A through H. Round two will finish in two months time on 28 April, when the two highest scorers in each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers, will progress to round 3. The pools were entirely random, so while some pools may end up being more competitive than others, this is by chance rather than design.
The judges would like to point out two quick rules reminders. First, any content promoted during the interim period (that is, on or after 27 February) is eligible for points in round 2. Second, any content worked on significantly this year is eligible for points if promoted in this round. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which would otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Wacht am Rhein
[edit]As you'll recall, the FPC got a little bogged down. I'd like it to pass a second time, so I was wondering if you think that launching File:Wacht am Rhein map (Edit 3).svg alone is appropriate. It would depend, for example, on whether you accept my viewpoint on the arrows. If you think that edit3 is the best (or 4, I have no opinion), then I don't know whether you have to nominate or conominate, or something. I plan to tweak it (minorly) following a suggestion on my talk page. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 11:54, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. Yes, unfortunately the FPC got a little derailed and I can't help but feel that was in the most part my fault for adding so many ALTs and confusing !voters.
I totally accept your viewpoint on the arrows. As I later said in the nomination, I hadn't considered that having the arrows at different widths and sizes gave the impression that some attacks were larger than others when in fact they just covered a greater distance. - I hope that with you not having a preference doesn't mean that I somehow caused you to become disconnected with the map. My intentions were just to improve on your work by tweaking things to Wikipeida's map style. My preference is for edit 4 with the slightly opaqued topography. You're right that it improves readability, because the elevations are not the main thing going on here and we want to see the lines and arrows without too much interference, but at the same time we can still see that it took place over raised terrain.
- I saw the bit that User:Udisblizbadjoke wsa talking about. His image looks like there's a couple of arrows missing in this one. It's probably better if you just add them to the file that's already uploaded and upload over it rather than create yet another entirely new file page, especially since it doesn't seem like it's a major change. Feel free to nominate whenever you're ready. There's no need to conominate but if you're feeling particularly generous a nod as co-creator would help me in my WP:CUP endeavour!
Matthewedwards : Chat 03:25, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I think I've made the necessary changes to File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg. Good to go, do you think? I certainly hope so. (Oh, and I certainly think you should get points if it passes. We'll see what they think.) Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 12:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Something went wrong, it looks like you uploaded the original again... Matthewedwards : Chat 13:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry I don't know what you mean. This was your version, and then I made two smal adjustments: here and here. Those seem to only have done what I intended. (Oh, and thanks for the tidying up of the articles also.) Thanks, Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- NP. I can see the differences now, but I had to clear my cache for some reason. The first and third looked the same at first. Matthewedwards : Chat 21:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Nominated at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Wacht am Rhein (2). Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 12:18, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- NP. I can see the differences now, but I had to clear my cache for some reason. The first and third looked the same at first. Matthewedwards : Chat 21:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry I don't know what you mean. This was your version, and then I made two smal adjustments: here and here. Those seem to only have done what I intended. (Oh, and thanks for the tidying up of the articles also.) Thanks, Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:46, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Something went wrong, it looks like you uploaded the original again... Matthewedwards : Chat 13:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I think I've made the necessary changes to File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg. Good to go, do you think? I certainly hope so. (Oh, and I certainly think you should get points if it passes. We'll see what they think.) Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 12:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Film January–February newsletter
[edit]
GRAPPLE X 00:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
WPF1 Newsletter (February)
[edit]
 Year V · Issue 2 · February 6, 2012 – March 5, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Images Below is the F1 Picture of the month (found here). The picture has to be one uploaded in the last month and only from the current season.
 New images 1978 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article of the month – 2011 Japanese Grand Prix, failed Good Article nominee
 The 2011 Japanese Grand Prix (formally the XXXVII Japanese Grand Prix) was a Formula One motor race that was held on 9 October 2011 at the Suzuka Circuit in Suzuka, Japan. It was the fifteenth round of the 2011 Formula One season, and the thirty-eighth time the Japanese Grand Prix had been held. The race, contested over 53 laps, was won by McLaren's Jenson Button, after he started from second on the grid. Fernando Alonso finished in second place for Scuderia Ferrari, and Sebastian Vettel completed the podium, with third, for Red Bull Racing. Vettel had started the race in pole position alongside Button, whom he had marginally outqualified. The two drivers were the only two within mathematical contention for the title. Button attempted to overtake Vettel at the start of the race, yet was pressured towards the grass by Vettel which resulted in him losing second place to Lewis Hamilton (who had started in third). Vettel was passed by Button in the second pit-stop phase, and was then passed by Alonso in the third. Hamilton slipped back from second to fifth, predominantly in the pit-stops; debris from a collision between himself and Felipe Massa caused a safety car period in the race. The second Red Bull of Mark Webber finished in fourth position. As a consequence of the race, Vettel secured the World Drivers' Championship for the second year in succession, having only required one point prior to the weekend to be declared World Champion. Button remained in second place on the standings after his victory, extending the gap over third-placed Alonso to eight points. In the World Constructors' Championship, Red Bull's championship lead over McLaren was cut to 130 points, with Ferrari a further 96 points behind in third position. (More...) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012 Teams and Races
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 15:34, 5 March 2012 (UTC).
List of First Ladies of the United States
[edit]Hi Matthew,
Great job with getting List of First Ladies of the United States up to featured list status! I have nominated the article to go up on the main page in the Today's Featured List section. Some concerns about the article have been raised here. If you are willing to help address these concerns, it would be greatly appreciated.
Neelix (talk) 21:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Matthew,
- I have also nominated List of Blue Peter presenters for TFL, so any help with that nomination would be appreciated as well.
.svg) |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg , was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 16:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Television episode and season articles badly needed
[edit]Based on your userbox display, I thought you might be interested in the lists at Wikipedia:Television_episodes#Episodes.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
The Metropolitan - March
[edit] Issue 39: March 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
15:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
I sent you an wiki email
[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
- OK, I'll read it. Matthewedwards : Chat 15:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Doon School edits
[edit]I'm suspicious. I think RickTyers (talk · contribs), Mussolinispas (talk · contribs) and Anony1212 (talk · contribs) are the same person. The user pages are very similar and make me recall some old Indian socks I dealt with many years ago (unconnected I'm sure) that followed the same pattern of "I'm from [insert Western location here] but am currently in [insert Indian location here]". There seems to be a class project wrt the school article on WP. If some accounts are socks then this affects the FPC and a deletion discussion on the school template. It seems more likely that Rick is at school rather than a "professional photographer", though the FPC was taken with the Canon EOS 5D Mark II noted on his user page. Rick's commons account has other uploaded photos with no EXIF data but similar small-web-page-size proportions that are suspicious. They could be legit but why not upload the original size? There's an upload of a poorly scanned photo of Rajiv Gandhi at the Doon School that was really taken in 1985 and is almost certainly the copyright of someone else. Some admin-level investigations required? Colin°Talk 20:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Colin. I wouldn't like to hazzard a guess as to whom these people are. I noticed that most are new accounts and that most are involved in editing the school's article, and that they've posted on each others' talk pages. If they aren't the same person, it's a safe bet to say they all know each other personally. The Rajiv Ghandi photo we have is definitely not Commons suitable, but it does seem to be an alternate version to that at The South Asian Life & Times, at least from comparing size and colouring. I'm no photographer or image manipulator though so I don't know if it's possible to get one from the other. Some investigation into the editors may be warranted, but despite being an admin, I wouldn't know where to start with that! Matthewedwards : Chat 23:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. Note, if you did create this file, you may want to upload it to Wikimedia Commons, which will allow the image to be accessed by all Wikimedia Foundation projects (which include the various localized versions of Wikipedia)
If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 23:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)- What a wall of text! Nevermind all that. The image is licensed under the GFDL-1.2 only template, which has been deprecated since 2009. You might want to switch it to something like {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} instead. Cheers! Kaldari (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Is the license depreciated on Wikipedia only, or in general? I tried to make it as restrictive as possible because as the file description says, it's just my sandbox for my svg files. Matthewedwards : Chat 23:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
[edit]
|
.svg){kind=link}
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Happy Birthday (2012)
[edit]
Long/lat lines
[edit]Just a quick note: I did do the one particular line you mentioned. It doesn't quite work on long/lat lines, I don't think, because of their odd curvature, so I didn't repeat it on the others. In any case, you're welcome to make any such alterations yourself, or nudge me further on them, I don't mind. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 18:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Will do :) Matthewedwards : Chat 02:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 March newsletter
[edit]We are over half way through the second round of this year's WikiCup and things are going well! Grapple X (submissions), of Pool B, is our highest overall scorer thanks to his prolific writings on television and film. In second place is Pool H's Cwmhiraeth (submissions), thanks primarily to work on biological articles, especially in marine biology and herpetology. Third place goes to Pool E's Casliber (submissions), who also writes primarily on biology (including ornithology and botany) and has already submitted two featured articles this round. Of the 63 contestants remaining, 15 (just under a quarter) have over 100 points this round. However, 25 are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly. 32 contestants, the top two from each pool and the 16 next-highest scorers, will advance to round 3.
Congratulations to 
Matthewedwards (submissions), whose impressive File:Wacht am Rhein map (Opaque).svg became the competition's first featured picture. Also, congratulations to 
12george1 (submissions), who claimed good topic points, our first contestant this year to do so, for his work on Wikipedia:Featured topics/1982 Atlantic hurricane season. This leaves featured topics and featured portals as the only sources of points not yet utilised. However, as recent statistics from Miyagawa (submissions) show, no source has yet been utilised this competition to the same extent it has been previously!
It has been observed that the backlogs at good article candidates are building up again. While the points for good article reviews will be remaining constant, any help that can be offered keeping the backlog down would be appreciated. On a related note, if you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)