Talk:Bullet hit squib

Bullet hit squib is currently a Film good article nominee. Nominated by Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) at 12:33, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Note: all feedback from first GA review implemented. removed and replaced all youtube and wordpress links, cited with books/publications and corrected typos. More citations were also added and some minor rewrite were performed

Short description: Special effects device used to simulate a gunshot wound on an actor

Bullet hit squib was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (October 29, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Explosives C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I still have the jacket ;)

I've kept the jacket for those wondering. I still wear it occasionally, but it's mostly used for developing an automated firing system. I'll put more squibs on it and do a demo video ;)

I also want to put up a figure of squibs with exploding down feathers instead of fake blood to simulate a gunshot wound on a down jacket. Will do so when I have time. Stay tuned. Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) 00:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you do special effects for movies? I'm curious how you know about these. Félix An (talk) 00:28, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Yes and no, it's not my main job per se. I was thinking of doing some Youtube videos to go more in depth, and maybe a few tutorial/consulting type pages. I really want to spend some more time on it but I'm quite busy. What do you like to know more about? It seems like I didn't explain it that well in the article ;) Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) 11:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to see some sort of documentation or tutorial on how this effect can be accomplished! It would be very useful for independent filmmakers and wannabe ones like me. 😂 Since Wikipedia is not suitable for tutorials, you could write it on the sister website Wikibooks, which has plenty of tutorials! Félix An (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ah interesting, i was thinking of setting up a wordpress website for this. i could look into wikibooks, i've never thought of it, thanks! i think the main thing needing emphasis is safety. another thing i find many people overlook is how the whole aesthetics and preparation work with the clothing. been meaning to do this for the last year or two now, when i started with this article. Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) 14:08, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bullet hit squib/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Adenosine Triphosphate (talk · contribs) 18:38, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Phlsph7 (talk · contribs) 10:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adenosine Triphosphate and thanks for all your contributions to this article. However, despite the improvements, the article fails criterion 2b since there are too many unreferenced paragraphs. Examples are the paragraphs starting with "Despite advances in digital effects", "Dead-character costumes are stage clothes", and "While most outfits can only be used once". According to criterion 2b, these passages require inline citations "no later than the end of the paragraph".

The article uses various sources from youtube and wordpress. They are considered generally unreliable and typically shouldn't be used, see WP:RSP.

I suggest that you add/replace all the relevant references before a renomination.

A few other observations

WP:EARWIG detects no copyvios
The assembld blood squib device is replace "assembld" with "assembled"
the irreversable damage caused by replace "irreversable" with "irreversible"
shooting a scene with blood squibs start with a thorough replace "start" with "starts"
Careful manfuacturing and strategic replace "manfuacturing" with "manufacturing "
Any issues that occured are documented replace "occured" with "occurred"

Phlsph7 (talk) 10:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA review edit

Thanks to @Phlsph7's prompt review, i'll work on finding more reliable sources or remove the text until a suitable reference is found, and additionally fix the typos.

i'll work on these asap when i can find some free time.

much appreciated for the time and effort. Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) 10:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]