Jump to content

User talk:Lemonade51/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

You're mentioned

Hi! You are mentioned in a post that will run on the Wikimedia Foundation blog this week describing some of the editors who signed up for HighBeam accounts and their motivations for doing so. I just wanted to let you know. If you'd rather not be mentioned, please respond below or on my talk page. Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 18:41, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Liverpool F.C. 4–3 Newcastle United F.C. (1996)

Hi, Lemonade51, I've completed the copy-edit you requested to the above article; I've marked one sub-section as unreferenced. I hope it's okay. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

No problem, thank you for taking the time to do so. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 09:35, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

67 European Cup GA nom

No worries Lemonade. Thanks for doing the review. If it helps I find a good way to spellcheck an article is to copy into a word document and then use it's spellchecker. Anyway thanks agai and I'm pleased that the article is good enough for GA. Adam4267 (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

  • Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
    • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
    • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

List of Friends characters

List of Friends characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I've revamped the whole list.Would you reply in this peer review? --George Ho (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Sure, have done. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 09:38, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
More updates. I don't want that botty to close the peer review if unreplied. --George Ho (talk) 07:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
List of Tokyo Mew Mew characters is discussed in my talk page and Giants'. --George Ho (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Guest stars

Heh. Well I think we should contact them and explain what we were using it for, just to see if they have any response. There's nothing in itself wrong with using paywall sources, is there? So if we can get in, then we could probably still use it, and I don't mind paying because this is basically IMDb Pro only it passes as a reliable source. Although, as you say, there doesn't appear to by any way to actually subscribe yet. If not, we'll have to, somehow, find other sources. Gran2 11:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I've found them the most likely contact form and sent a message. Seriously, what kind of product doesn't let you actually buy it? Gran2 21:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Looks good, should be able to replace most of them with that, although each will need to be checked to ensure the source covers them carefully. Gran2 14:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Okay, so they responded and gave me a two-week free trial. Ha. Gran2 09:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Well I don't think we need to replace them all. Yahoo is perfectly reliable and will always be there. But I'll probably change a few where Yahoo isn't totally accurate as it does have specific URLs. Gran2 14:53, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Maybe not ready, but it's going to need an FLC to fix any issues because the PR was useless! I see the Friends list failed, so can we do a joint nom? You have a better grasp of list formatting than I do, and I'm a bit pressed for time at the moment. Gran2 11:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:The One Where Rachel Smokes.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The One Where Rachel Smokes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:21, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Did you know nomination of "The One Where Rachel Smokes"

I have recently nominated the article for the DYK main page. I wonder if the article might have sufficient needs. Here is discussion: Template:did you know nominations/The One Where Rachel Smokes. --George Ho (talk) 23:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of The One Where Rachel Smokes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 00:56, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The One Where Rachel Smokes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tales from the Crypt and Jack Allen
The One with Rachel's Date (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Johnny Messner

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The One Hundredth

I've created Template:Did you know nominations/The One Hundredth and placed it in the April 17, 2012, log. --George Ho (talk) 20:53, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Will add citations! -- Lemonade51 (talk) 21:14, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Is ALT 2 correct? --George Ho (talk) 21:58, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
ALT2 is incorrect because it mentions Lisa Kudrow's childbirth. ALT5 is incorrect -- was a 'hospital set', the audience were surprised that the coffee house/apartments weren't used. Lisa Kudrow won an Emmy for this episode I think but don't quote me on this, I haven't had time to check. As it stands ALT 3 and ALT 4 would be good noms. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 22:08, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The One Where Rachel Smokes

Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The One Hundredth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to David Crane
The One Where Ross Can't Flirt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Law and Order

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:FriendsLogo.jpg

Per Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#File:FriendsLogo.jpg, this image is ineligible for copyrights, isn't it, as you did in File:The Friends Stage cropped.jpg. --George Ho (talk) 08:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Woody Interruptus

I have copied-and-pasted the accolates section into List of Cheers episodes#ep207... more like a merge without redirection yet. Seriously, without enough expansion, I wonder if I must redirect this episode to the list. What do you say? --George Ho (talk) 20:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

No problem, I intended to expand the article at the time of creating it but unfortunately never had the time to do so. Hopefully I'll get back to it one day or someone can expand it. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Feel free to jump in at Talk:Woody Interruptus.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the discussion. There is now a formal merger proposal. Please come comment on the talk page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Since the "Woody Interruptus" merger proposal has failed, and deletion is out of question at this time, I have started a discussion about developing a proposal about notability of episodes in WP:village pump (idea lab)#Notability of television (or radio) episodes. Join in. --George Ho (talk) 19:07, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arsène Wenger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Mirror
Dennis Bergkamp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sporting Life

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Inappropriate edit summaries.

Reverting changes to List of Friends episodes as vandalism, something you've done twice now,[1][2] when the changes clearly are not vandalism, is highly inappropriate. As I indicated at the FLC discussion, this needs to be discussed on the article's talk page, not at the FLC discussion, where I'm about to post more on this issue. You are invited to a discussion on this at Talk:List of Friends episodes#Disputed changes, which is discussing recent changes that involve replacement of transclusion with custom tables. Thank you. --AussieLegend (talk) 01:54, 4 May 2012 (UTC)--AussieLegend (talk) 00:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey Lemonade51, thanks for all your efforts in trying to create a featured list, but I'm guessing we're fighting a losing battle with the TV project. I guess it precludes the TV project from getting FLs in the future which is a shame and I'll need to start auditing the existing FLs because of the various discussions. Hope you're well and not too discouraged, maybe time to find a new subject for FLC?! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
No worries! I'll have a look in due course. Naturally I fail to see why you're not simply transcluding the content of all of the bios to that list.... (!) but I'll see what I can do! Best to you, and thank you again for your patience and efforts in trying to promote Wikipedia's most excellent work despite others holding you back. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:06, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

There is the dispute discussed at WP:DRN#Friends episodes. If you are involved in this dispute, count yourself there. --George Ho (talk) 21:29, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Not convinced this DRN is getting to the heart of the matter (i.e. an insistence on transcluding errors and MOS fails), but hey, suck it and see... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Rihanna videography

Hello, Lemonade51. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Rihanna videography/archive1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Tomica (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The One Hundredth

Orlady (talk) 08:03, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you very much for your GA review of Blockhaus d'Éperlecques‎ - it's much appreciated. Prioryman (talk) 21:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Arsène Wenger

This user helped promote Arsène Wenger to good article status.

Well done. SilkTork ✔Tea time 12:46, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy

Hi Lemonade51. You previously peer reviewed Grey's Anatomy back in January, and your comments really were a great help, as I developed the article. I have completely rewritten the article, taking all advice given by you. That being said, I plan to nominate for FA soon, but would like to get one more peer review. I was looking for a user who's dealt with FAC before, and I did some Wikistalking in your contributions and noticed you've dealt with it, so I would really appreciate your comments on the article before I nominate. I've listed other information regarding the requests of the peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Grey's Anatomy/archive2 and would be thrilled if you had the time to pick up the peer review again, due to the great help you were last time. Hope to hear back from you, TRLIJC19 (talk) 16:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

FAC review of Doc Adams

Hi Lemonade. Just wanted to let you know that I saw your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Doc Adams/archive1, and I think they are resolved now. Giants2008 (Talk) 16:43, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I think the issues you brought up in the spot-checks have been taken care of. Thanks for doing that. Giants2008 (Talk) 19:53, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Question

Hello again, Lemonade51. Being that you are planning to peer review Grey's Anatomy, I have a question. I would like the article to be copyedited by WP:GOCE. So, would it be wise to get it copyedited before you review, or after? TRLIJC19 (talk) 17:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Arsenal F.C. in European football

Orlady (talk) 08:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Your GA review for 2007 Monte Carlo Rally

Thanks for reviewing the article. I've addressed everything (or explained why I haven't for anything not addressed). I'm eagerly awaiting the result of this to know if it's worth continuing with the rest of the 2007 season and other seasons for which I have the books, but if there's anything else I'll take care of it. And if you have any suggestions for preparing it for FAC, could you let me know as well? Thanks, Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 04:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 14:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy

Hi, Lemonade51, I've addressed all the minor issues you posted at my talk page, and am ready for more comments, when you get the time. Thank you, TRLIJC19 (talk) 20:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi again, it's been about 10 days since I've heard from you, about the Grey's Anatomy PR at Wikipedia:Peer review/Grey's Anatomy/archive2. I assume you're still planning on getting to reviewing, but I would just like to confirm. TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Football editing

My edits actually clarify the situations in several cases, particularly the FA Cup withdrawal, as well as adding the UEFA Supercup result. Plus the Goal.com poll is as valid as the Channel 4 poll.MonkeyKingBar (talk) 13:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Olivier Giroud

Sorry about that. I was reverting graffiti and accidentally reverted your edit, which beat mine by about five seconds. Hopefully, I correctly restored your edit. FYI, a semi-protect for this article has already been requested, so much of the anonymous IP nonsense should settle down shortly. Cheers! -- Bgpaulus (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Paul McCartney FAC

The article is much improved since your last comment, and your input would be appreciated at the Paul McCartney FAC. — GabeMc (talk) 03:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Guest stars

Awesome, and I've added the note. Can you start the FLC please? I have pretty limited time over the next two weeks, but should be able to pitch with some of the issues raised. Thanks for all your great work on the list. Gran2 13:30, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

GAN

I was wondering if you could GA review Awake (TV series) article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBrandley (talk • contribs) 15 June 2012, 22:06 (UTC)

Arsenal kits

Yeah I'd give it a go. Wouldn't call the away innacurate though, it looks pretty good with the limitations of the basic Wiki templates. Think that third kit was the away one from 01-02 as well, but with a new club badge and sponsor. Memories of Wiltord and that game against United, clinching the title at OT. VEOonefive 03:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Norman Whiteside

I have accepted all your comments and changed the article accordingly.--EchetusXe 14:35, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries by Mohammad Yousuf

Hello, Lemonade51. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Mohammad Yousuf/archive3.
Message added ZiaKhan 20:00, 21 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Osama Bin Laden review

Sorry, but is there a rule that anyone who nominates the article has to contribute to the article in some way or the other? I failed to see such a rule when I was going through the Good Article nomination procedure. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Lemonade51. You have new messages at TheOriginalSoni's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

My regarding the nomination of BoT

I apologize for the nomination of the article nomination of the Battle of Toro. I've nominated articles I've done little or no editing to for GA status and they all went through, but I obviously wasn't in the right mindset when doing that (probably sleepy, but there's no excuse for it). I started to second guess myself once I nominated it. I think I'll hold of on nominations for a while, at least with subjects concerning those I not especially well-known in. Once again, sorry. LeftAire (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank You!

Thank You!
Thanks for your help....you make Wikipedia a better place!

RDN1F TALK 20:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

RE: X-Files GAC

I may need a few more days. Thanks. Also, I was wondering if you could vote at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Awake episodes/archive2. Thanks again, TBrandley 16:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

FAC

Hello. Could yo take a look at this FAC and give your opinion? I'd be very obliged if you give some concrete support/oppose, even if Leaning, since the FAC has become stalled to an extent. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Umm, are you there? ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 16:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Sure, thanks :) ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 18:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

X-Files GAR

I'd just like to say thanks for taking time to review The X-Files page. I'd like to apologize, because I don't think our project was ready and I haven't had the time to work on it at all. I really don't think it was anywhere ready to go to begin with.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

If the article fails, then they will be good suggestions for next time. TBrandley 20:55, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Bergkamp GA

I've reviewed Dennis Bergkamp for GA. It looks very good. There are just a couple minor things to address before it's ready.--Batard0 (talk) 18:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Paulo Henrique Ganso

Hi Lemonade51, thanks for your diligence, but when I reverted this user's edits, I did so because they definitely constituted vandalism. Check out the diffs for yourself: [3], [4], [5]. That user is now blocked. And, according to this article, Ganso does not currently play for Santos FC. Thanks! Rinkle gorge (talk) 22:25, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Paul McCartney FAC (update)

The Paul McCartney article has now been thoroughly copyedited top-to-bottom by numerous editors including User:Lfstevens, who is a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. If you can find the time in your busy schedule, please consider stopping by and taking another look, and hopefully, !voting. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 03:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Arsène Wenger

I will be glad to look at it, but it may take me several days (by Friday or Saturday). Thanks for asking, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:47, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

2nd merger proposal of Woody Interruptus

I proposed that notability of this episode be put aside in favor of doing what's best for Wikipedia. Feel free to join. --George Ho (talk) 03:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

renewed debate

You were involved in the previous discussion, so you should be aware of Talk:Woody_Interruptus#Merger_proposal.2C_part_deux.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Poppy Meadow/archive3 - Question on one of your points. — M.Mario (T/C) 17:10, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that! If all your points have been fixed, and you can see no more points to be made, you can put Support underneath your points, to show you think it should be a FA. — M.Mario (T/C) 17:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

GAN

I have addressed issues on Grapple X's Somehow, Satan Got Behind Me for him. TBrandley 21:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Coach's Daughter/archive1

You have replies. --George Ho (talk) 17:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

LFC in Europe FAC

Hey, as you commented on the previous nom, I thought you might like to have another look at the article as I've taken it back to FAC again. Only had the one review so far, would really appreciate if you could have a look at it. Cheers. NapHit (talk) 18:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Just to let you know I've responded to your comments. NapHit (talk) 19:18, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

2012 Scottish Cup Final

Hi Lemonade, please don't forget your GA review on this page. I think it's just about there so if you could give it one last look over please. Thanks Adam4267 (talk) 21:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Adam4267 (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Chrisye discography/archive1

Hi Lemonade, I've replied at the nomination above and was wondering if you could revisit it. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:10, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Maya Angelou

You didn't sign your post at the FA talk :-) hamiltonstone (talk) 23:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Arsène Wenger

I'll have another look through to see if there's anything we've missed in the Peer Review, even though at FAC I don't think there'd be too much needed doing. Although you might be asking the wrong person about FAC, I've been trying for years and never managed one yet haha. Cheers, BigDom 19:17, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

OK, I had another look through and it looks mostly alright to me. The FAC reviewers will check prose better than I can, so I'll leave that to them. The only thing I think you'll get pulled up for is the shortness of the Grampus Eight section, just because it's considerably less detailed than the other parts but it shouldn't be too big a problem. Good luck, BigDom 10:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

FAC Request

I was wondering if you could leave comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1. But, you don't have to. Thanks! TBrandley 16:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Be Warned - Rangers FC - an attempt to push through a controversial 'same club' approach

Hello. You have contributed to the Newco Rangers article so I thought yuou should be made aware that an attempt is being made to undermine this article by pushing through a 'same club' approach despite many of us believing this is heavily biased and very selective use of the sources. You may wish to follow what is proposed at the Talk:Rangers F.C/Sandbox. Spiritofstgeorge (talk) 12:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for your FAC comments for Awake (TV series)! I think I got all of the issues. Thanks again! TBrandley 18:00, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Re: Guest stars

Yeah it has gone a bit quiet hasn't it? But that seems to be the nature of FLC at the moment. We've kind of had an unwritten rule at the project that we don't support Simpsons project articles in their nominations, to avoid the impression of bias. But it may be worth it in case anybody has any comments. Gran2 18:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

List of international cricket centuries by Inzamam-ul-Haq

Hi, any chance you could have a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Inzamam-ul-Haq/archive1. Zia Khan 01:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Ryan

Hi Lemonade,

I was wondering if you could possibly take a look at Rex Ryan at FAC if you have some spare time, I'd appreciate your input. Thanks. -- The Writer 2.0 Talk 02:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Lemonade51. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Grey's Anatomy episodes/archive1.
Message added 01:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks, TBrandley 01:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

List of The Simpsons guest stars

Nice work on the list! Congrats on getting it to FL status! :) Theleftorium (talk) 09:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Well done for having the initiative to do anything with it! Thanks for all your help. Gran2 11:12, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

List of Grey's Anatomy episodes

Hi, since your comments have been addressed at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Grey's Anatomy episodes/archive1, I was wondering if you would consider supporting/opposing the list's promotion. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

FAC

Since your comments have been fixed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1, I was wondering if you could support at the FAC, unless more comments are to be fixed. Don't have to. Cheers! TBrandley 23:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Request for review

Hi! I was wondering if you could review/leave some comments for Give Peace a Chance (Grey's Anatomy) at its FAC. It's a fairly short article. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

I've replied to the comments you left at the FAC; I hope you can now consider supporting/opposing its promotion. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Having said the above about 5 days ago, I hope you can revisit the article soon. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

2012-13 Arsenal FC season

Hey mate. I noticed that you wanted the 2012-13 Arsenal F.C. season article to look like the 2002-03 season and how I said almost a month ago that I would modify the current page but have not yet. Well now I have time to do so but the problem is that such a major construction effort would 1: take a long time and 2: make the article look worse than what it is. So in order to get around this I decided to redo the entire page here... User:Arsenalkid700/2012-13 Arsenal F.C. season. Around 2-3 days after the transfer window ends I plan to implement the new page which I want to base on the 2002-03 season because when I looked at it I was amazed. I loved the attention to detail and that is what is missing in the current page. There is a reason why the 2002-03 page is a GA and that the current one has so many problems. One of them is the amount of tables. Anyway if you want, you can add to the User:Arsenalkid700/2012-13 Arsenal F.C. season page if you want. Cheers. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 13:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

2012–13 Arsenal F.C. season again

Hello, and sorry to bother you. I wonder if you'd be willing to express an opinion in the talk page thread Talk:2012–13 Arsenal F.C. season#Article structure on the specific question of reliably sourcing this season's transfer fees and reporting net transfer spend. That thread, and the post immediately above it, stemmed from my intervention in a revert-war (rather wish I hadn't) and it'd be good if we could try and reach a consensus so that normal editing can resume ASAP. Thanks for your time, Struway2 (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

List of The X-Files episodes

Since all of your comments have been addressed, could you possibly leave more comments or support its FL promotion. Thanks, TBrandley 00:41, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2000–01 Arsenal F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonatan Johansson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Drive Award

The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
Your recognition for 29 GA reviews at the last June-July GAN Review Round. Regards. — Pyrotec (talk) 15:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

The X-Files Main Page

Hey there! I know that you did the GA review of The X-Files over the summer. Is there any chance you can take a quick scan now and see if I fixed all the issues you found. Recently, I devoted that last week or so to completely overhauling it to get it up to snuff. By no means am I asking you to re-review it, I just thought if you wanted to check, that would be super-helpful. Thanks!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Wenger

If it is of any help, I'd be happy to have another look before you re-nominate; I can do a few more spot-checks and copy-edit anything which jumps out. As I said at the FAC, I still think it is an impressive piece of work, and just needs some tightening and polishing. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:47, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I would also be happy to help you with a re-nomination attempt. The article is closer to meeting FA standards than you may think. What it really needs is for you to go through all of the sources and make sure there's no more close paraphrasing of the kind found at FAC, and that the material in the article is covered in the sources. If you can do that, I'm sure Sarastro and I can get the prose up to the required standard. As a first step, I took the liberty of re-titling the section headings that became an issue at FAC. I hope you don't mind, and I hope you don't give up on wanting to see the article pass at FAC. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:35, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

sandbox

Couldn't help but notice your Arsenal sandbox and i have added a topic which I think would help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.195.80.218 (talk) 13:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

GA review

Wondered if you're too busy (after all, your edits have been scarce lately) or could take a look at FIFA Club World Cup, which is currently at the GAN waiting a review. (BTW, great article you have on Arsène Wenger. Hope it gets to Featured status someday) igordebraga ≠ 15:51, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of stations of the Paris Métro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clichy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:43, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

2010 United Kingdom government formation

Hi, thanks for taking a look at this. I'll update the sentences you highlighted as soon as I can and look around for a couple of refs to support the text. I think the one about Blair's popularity is possibly covered by a later source, but I'll take a closer look. Thanks again. Paul MacDermott (talk) 16:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Just gone through them all and updated everything. Should be ok now. Thanks again for the review. Paul MacDermott (talk) 11:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Olly Blackburn GA

Thanks very much for this helpful review!

I've responded at Talk:Olly Blackburn/GA1.

I did my best to implement the majority of your helpful recommendations, — Cirt (talk) 17:07, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much for the promotion! — Cirt (talk) 17:20, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Yes, that would be most appreciated! I'll be out of town and traveling so my responses won't be as prompt, but I'll still try to respond as best I can to all the recommendations in a timely manner, — Cirt (talk) 17:27, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Simpson GA

Thanks for your comments here. I believe I've addressed them all. I am at your disposal to consider any further modifications. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Kellie Loder GA

Hi Lemonade,

Thank you for taking on the Kellie Loder good article nomination. I have made changes to the article according to your recommendations and responded to your comments on the nomination page.

Neelix (talk) 18:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lemonade,
Considering that you were the GAN reviewer for the Kellie Loder article, I thought that you should be notified of the article's FAC. Any comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.
Neelix (talk) 02:32, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Lemonade,
The FAC was successful! I have nominated it to go up on the main page here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.
Neelix (talk) 17:40, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Pablo Ibáñez

Hello. Just to say thanks for taking the trouble not only to review the thing, but to pick up the punctuation errors and awkward sentences that an article's creator can't possibly spot themselves. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1998 FA Charity Shield

The article 1998 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 10 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:1998 FA Charity Shield for things which need to be addressed. I'm happy to put it on hold for longer if you are busy in real life, but it'd be good if you let me know. Thanks. Shudde talk 11:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

I've passed the article. Good work. Think it's much better now. Congratulations. - Shudde talk 11:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series/archive1

I'm SoapFan12. I was wondering if you will be interested on reviewing : Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series/archive1. I have approach because, I've seen the comments you have wrote for Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by House/archive1, and I was wondering if you could so the smae for me. If it's not possible for you, I understand. But it will be greatly appreciated! SoapFan12 00:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the review at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by House/archive1. All the reference issues should be fixed now. Nergaal (talk) 04:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

How does the list look now? Nergaal (talk) 21:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Shepperton

Dear Lemonade 51

I have sought to improve the article thanks to your constructive comments and await your further assistance. Adam37 (talk) 17:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

1996-97 Arsenal F.C. season GA review

Hello, Lemonade51. You have new messages at Talk:1996–97 Arsenal F.C. season/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Peer review/2000 UEFA Cup Final riots/archive3

Regarding your comments on the Wikipedia:Peer review/2000 UEFA Cup Final riots/archive3, I would like to take you up on your offer if you could find some Turkish sources on the riots. If you can I will be grateful if you could place them in the PR so I can work out where they could go or feel free to make changes to the article. Thanks. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 15:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

re Olly Blackburn

Reply: I've got a few others waiting in the queue at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Topic lists/Media and drama that are related to the topic of film, if you're interested, that'd be most appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 22:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks much, I'll get to addressing those helpful points. — Cirt (talk) 02:21, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Update on Robert Boulter

All set with Talk:Robert Boulter/GA1.

I've incorporated the source you suggested and addressed all of your other recommendations.

Thanks for the helpful input,

— Cirt (talk) 18:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments

I was wondering if you review my featured list article (Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series/archive1)? Please, it will be greatly appreciated! SoapFan12 21:52, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

GA Review update for Sian Breckin

I've gone through your helpful recommendations.

Perhaps you could revisit?

Thanks again for the review,

— Cirt (talk) 18:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much, — Cirt (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Review

Hey, I was wondering if you are still on board, on reviewing my FLC article? SoapFan12 Talk page here smile 13:47, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Responded

I have responded to you're requests for my FLC canditates, are you ready to resolved you're comments or is there more? SoapFan12 Talk smile 02:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1996–97 Arsenal F.C. season

The article 1996–97 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:1996–97 Arsenal F.C. season for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Meetthefeebles -- Meetthefeebles (talk) 17:47, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

1911 Giro

Hey Lemonade,

Thanks for the review! I believe I have addressed all your concerns. Disc Wheel (Talk + Tontributions) 04:27, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003 FA Cup Final

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 2003 FA Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:46, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003 FA Cup Final

The article 2003 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:2003 FA Cup Final for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 11:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003 FA Cup Final

The article 2003 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2003 FA Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Hello, I have asked you to comment before on my FLC, which I am very grateful, I was wondering if you could give comments on my new FLC?. I would really appreciated. Thanks!  — SoapFan12 Talk smile 23:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/F.C. Porto in international club football/archive2

Hi there. You've commented on this FAC so I was wondering if you could check my replies, whenever you have the opportunity. Much appreciated. Parutakupiu (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999 FA Charity Shield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David May (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2007–08 Arsenal F.C. season

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 2007–08 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Jcc -- Jcc (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Lemonade, regarding your note to me on my talk page: There are some in-group language in this article that could be improved before I think it can be passed to GA. If you like, I can add my review to the current GAC. Just let me know! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Wanted to let you know that I've finally completed my comments here. Sorry it took a little longer than I wanted. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 05:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meadow Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

TFAR

Thanks for nominating the Arsenal history article. Your nomination was fine and I only had to make a few tweaks to the blurb to get it within the 1,200 character limit (thanks for that too!). I scheduled it for Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 7, 2013 - a day later than you asked, but Pink Floyd's Roger Waters had been nominated previously for 6th September so I thought I'd give him the nod for the actual day. It means the Arsenal article will appear on the Saturday instead - shame there isn't a home game that day! Best wishes, BencherliteTalk 23:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2000–01 Arsenal F.C. season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2000–01 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 07:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2000–01 Arsenal F.C. season

The article 2000–01 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2000–01 Arsenal F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2001–02 Arsenal F.C. season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2001–02 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 16:11, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005–06 Arsenal F.C. season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2005–06 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 16:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2001–02 Arsenal F.C. season

The article 2001–02 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2001–02 Arsenal F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005–06 Arsenal F.C. season

The article 2005–06 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2005–06 Arsenal F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Office season 9 FLN

I have implemented your suggestions for The Office season 9 list.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arsenal Training Centre

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arsenal Training Centre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 15:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Well done Gunner

Arsenal Barnstar
You have done great work on Arsenal related articles.Keep it up! RRD13 (talk) 03:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arsenal Training Centre

The article Arsenal Training Centre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arsenal Training Centre for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 04:02, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

FLC

Hi, could you have a this nomination when you get some free time? Regards, Zia Khan 05:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alex Ferguson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

FLC

Hi, could you review this nomination when you get some free time? Regards, —Zia Khan 02:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2003 FA Community Shield, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jimmy Davis and Steve Bennett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season

The article 1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! C679 18:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for 1999–2000 Arsenal F.C. season

Thanks for helping the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003 FA Community Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2003 FA Community Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1993 FA Charity Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1993 FA Charity Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hi everyone, I've noticed that a few of you haven't updated your totals as several reviews have passed but on the backlog page, it still says that the article is under review or on hold.

Please update your totals and continue to do so until February 1. If the status of a review is under review or on hold according to the backlog page, even though the article may have passed/failed, it will not count towards your final total.

For those that made pledges during the drive, the final donation amount will be determined sometime in February.

Thank-you.Sent by Dom497 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003 FA Community Shield

The article 2003 FA Community Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2003 FA Community Shield for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1993 FA Charity Shield

The article 1993 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1993 FA Charity Shield for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003 FA Community Shield

The article 2003 FA Community Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2003 FA Community Shield for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 08:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1993 FA Charity Shield

The article 1993 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1993 FA Charity Shield for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 08:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive Award

The Good Article Reviewer's Medal of Merit
For reviewing 4 Good article nominations during the December 2013 GAN Backlog Drive!--Dom497 (talk) 14:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

FLC request

Hi, can you spend some time for this nomination? —Vensatry (Ping) 13:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marc Overmars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willem II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Secret -- Secret (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marc Overmars

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marc Overmars you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 13:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marc Overmars

The article Marc Overmars you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marc Overmars for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 19:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marc Overmars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Winner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 30 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marc Overmars

The article Marc Overmars you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marc Overmars for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 13:51, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marc Overmars, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Branco and Dinamo Stadium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990)

The article Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 23:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990)

The article Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK

Hi, congratulations on the recent GA. I have nominated this article for Did you know, which will hopefully result in the article appearing on the main page. The link is Template:Did you know nominations/Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990). Thanks, Matty.007 08:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Manchester United–Arsenal brawl (1990)

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season

The article 2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 04:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Charity Shield PR

I'll try to get to it this week; I've a few commitments, but should be there in a day or two. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

I've been a little busy this week Lemonade51 but will try and take a look this weekend. -- Shudde talk 07:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for 2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 06:37, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 11:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free kick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season

The article 1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1991–92 Arsenal F.C. season for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1989 FA Charity Shield, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kevin Richardson and David Burrows (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

2013–14 Arsenal F.C. season

Hello? Italia2006 (talk) 20:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

2003–04 Arsenal F.C. season

Let's put it to a vote and see what happens. If my format is declined then so be it. I doubt it will be. Italia2006 (talk) 21:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism

Now you're just changing actually important edits for no reason. The article for Inter Milan is just that, Inter Milan, not F.C. Internazionale Milano. Also, in the rounds for the group stage, why have every single one linking to #Group B over and over again? Link them to the actual matches............ Stop already. You've no respect, at all. Italia2006 (talk) 21:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemonade51/Archive_4&oldid=1096966176"