Jump to content

User talk:Lemonade51/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:2006–07 UEFA Champions League

Template:2006–07 UEFA Champions League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – PeeJay 10:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

GAN notice

Hi Lemonade51, you currently have at least one article up a WP:GAN in the Sports and recreation section. In an attempt to clear out the backlog there, User:Wizardman asked all sports WikiProjects to review at least two articles from that section. I'm now going around and asking anybody with an article nominated under Sports and recreation to review at least one article in that section to help us clear the backlog out so your articles can finally be reviewed faster! iMatthew talk at 15:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

Please see Talk:Manchester United F.C. season 1997–98/GA1 for more information. Article is hold right now. Chris (talk) 13:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

GA passed. I was unaware that redlinks were allowed in the GA review, so please forgive my ignorance. It is a good article though. Chris (talk) 17:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Lemonade51! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 34 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Ian Payne - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Gerhard Aigner - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Marcus Buckland - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Whole 19 Yards

A tag has been placed on The Whole 19 Yards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mauler90 (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season

The article 1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no substantive content; no sources suggesting notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —EncMstr (talk) 08:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review of 1998–99 Manchester United F.C. season

Just to let you know I've placed this review on hold for up to seven days to allow any necessary work to be done. To be honest I think it needs quite a bit of work, and I'll comment further at the review as necessary, but I'm sure it could be done within a week if you're up for it. Malleus Fatuorum 21:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

I know this is becoming a bit of a saga, but I think we're starting to get there now. I'll probably leave the article for a day or so and then read through the whole thing again with fresh eyes, but in the meantime thanks for putting up with my continual moaning about one thing or another. :-) Malleus Fatuorum 20:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for putting up with my bad editing habits! You've done a remarkable job so far. — Lemonade51 (talk) 20:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
I always do. ;-) Malleus Fatuorum 20:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
I have one final observation before I come back to this, which is that I don't think the present structure of the article works. BSkyB's bid didn't come in until September, after the season was well underway, so to start with it in the body of the article is just ... wrong. 00:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
I agree, would work somewhere above the legacy I guess. It was just put at the top to get it into the article in the first place. — Lemonade51 (talk) 09:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In Dennis Bergkamp, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Cotton Bowl and Serravalle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In Dennis Bergkamp, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Goal of the Month (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

كيف الحال

كل عام وانت بخير --Neogeolegend (talk) 19:58, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Premier League Manager of the Season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sporting Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Liverpool F.C. 4–3 Newcastle United F.C. (1996), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David James and Andy Gray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited 1998 FIFA World Cup, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AFC and CAF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Peer review limits changed

This is a notice to all users who currently have at least one open peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review. Because of the large number of peer review requests and relatively low number of reviewers, the backlog of PRs has been at 20 or more almost continually for several months. The backlog is for PR requests which have gone at least four days without comments, and some of these have gone two weeks or longer waiting for a review.

While we have been able to eventually review all PRs that remain on the backlog, something had to change. As a result of the discussion here, the consensus was that all users are now limited to one (1) open peer review request.

If you already have more than one open PR, that is OK in this transition period, but you cannot open any more until all your active PR requests have been closed. If you would like someone to close a PR for you, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Peer review. If you want to help with the backlog, please review an article whoe PR request is listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog/items. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:03, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Topics in GA templates

Hello. In the GA templates, the "topic" refers to the categories listed at WP:GAPQ#Categories. It's not the article title. [1] [2] Thanks. Gimmetoo (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Whoops, will correct! Notice you did, cheers! – Lemonade51 (talk) 20:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

LFC in Europe

Hey, just to let you know I've responded to your comments at the FAC, I appreciate your busy, but if you have a spare moment would be great if you could have another look at the article, cheers. NapHit (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

No worries, I will definitely have a look through tomorrow with some suggestions. – Lemonade51 (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
I've replied to your latest comments, sorry for constantly bugging about this. NapHit (talk) 22:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Elisabeth Sladen

Hi, I read you comments on Elisabeth Sladen Good Article Nominee Talk Page can I please ask you for a example of References not formatted correctly and am example of what one should look like. Thanks Sfxprefects (talk) 21:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Ref 20 needs 'cite web' template, how was Ref 45 published on the BBC, why is ref 30's date 'Oct 13 2009', not 'October 13 2009' or '13 October 2009'. Were is the 'work' for Ref 6? IMDb is not a reliable source, I suggest you remove all the references related to the website. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 21:15, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited List of Friends episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Crane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Television episode and season articles badly needed

Great work with List of Friends episodes. I'd like to call your attention to a list of the most critically acclaimed episodes and seasons that need to be created: Wikipedia:TV-EPISODE#Important_articles_to_be_created.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:54, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

No problem, I'll get started on the Malcolm in the Middle episode, 'Bowling' as soon as I can (hopefully first thing Monday). -- Lemonade51 (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out. Please get it linked properly in all the proper templates and article pages (award category, award year, writers, directors, seasons, episode lists, actors, etc.).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Are you finished with "Love's Labor Lost (ER)"? It is not suppose to have a {{underconstruction}} for a lengthy period of time.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Whoops, I'll remove that now. – Lemonade51 (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Lemonade51/Sandbox

I just saw this browsing The Simpsons lists category. If you need any help with it, let me know! I'd love to help out! — Status {talkcontribs 08:49, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

I know I promised to help you out on this, so I've finally done something useful and taken the liberty of drafting an enchanced lead (which will probably need to be split off and and then summarised in an actual lead, but there we go) in your sandbox. Gran2 13:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Cheers for that! – Lemonade51 (talk) 13:52, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

The book has a separate section after the episode-by-episode summaries which contains a further list of guest stars which should probably fill in most of gaps (particularly Phil). I imagine they'll still be a few gaps it can't fill in though! I've never heard of InBaseline, but it looks reliable and is owned by the New York Times. Nice find. Gran2 21:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Righto, I'll leave you to finish sourcing the episodes from the book and I'll add the rest of the Season 23 guest-starring episodes probably before the end of April. Hopefully before September we can just move it to the actual article in a compelete state, ready for a FLC nom.
Plus need to address Maitch's concern on the sandbox talk page over the colouring system. – Lemonade51 (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I'm done. Specific Phil episodes were not covered by the back of the book, so all the blank ones will need to be covered by InBaseline. We also have the BBC source for the first 10 seasons if need be. Potentially, this could be pretty much done by the end of the week. Gran2 22:57, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks! I'll get started on adding the rest of the refs as soon as I can. – Lemonade51 (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

He's the show's music editor and has been since it began; I'd say that's sufficiently authoritative. I predict you'll probably need it for Nick McKaig as well (here). So yeah, I think we should add a few more images and we need to check the colourings, but it's pretty much good to go once the final sources are done. Gran2 17:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I've added some more images and sourced all the footnotes. I'd say we are done bar two issues. 1. NRBQ's appearance in Gump Roast is the only thing unsourced (is this reliable do you think?) 2. The colour scheme... I have some reservations about this. When re-reading through the list I found it really quite distracting in that it draws your eyes away from the white entries. It also seems kind of pointless, especially as we are using the daggers as well, and especially for the self-voicing guest stars because it's telling people the same thing as the next column is. My suggestion is to either axe the colours totally, or just keep the recurring guest star one. If they are kept, there are quite a few entries that should be coloured which are not yet. Thoughts? Gran2 21:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
We also need to add WP:ALT to each image which is now something of a requirement for featured lists and articles now. Though it's not an immediate concern.
1) I suppose that source will do for now. This one is the most toughest to find, hence why I left it blank. But we sadly can't know for sure if the author did some of his research from the present guest star list. Has the song been released on CD? I checked, it has been: The Simpsons: Testify. It credits Kang, Kodos and NRBQ singer.
2)I think we could axe the 'guest star played by themselves' key and keep the recurring. That way it'll be better to differentiate your Sideshow Bob's and Lionel Hutz's from the others. But then would that mean Glenn Close can be considered as a recurring guest star? – Lemonade51 (talk) 21:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
I don't own Testify (because it's all songs from the bad episodes) but I'll ask on NoHomers to better cite the booklet. If we're going to do recurring guest stars then it would have to be everybody who has appeared twice or more. Even if it was just people who've appeared twice or more as the same character it would be messy because Phil Hartman and Jon Lovitz have voiced a lot of minor, one-time characters as well. I'll scrap self-voicing but complete recurring. Gran2 21:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
No response on NoHomers but meh. This is an image of the back of the CD [3]. They're not mentioned. I rewatched the episode and they are not credited. Nor are they mentioned in the commentary. Ergo, I am inclined to just remove them. If we ever find a clear source they can be added back. Anyway, I think that's it. Time to put it into the mainspace. Would you like to do the honours? Gran2 10:31, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Done! I'll have another look for the NRBQ source, but in the meantime thanks for your help on this, considerable improvement I'd say to how it was shaped a few months back. – Lemonade51 (talk) 10:43, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I asked Chris Ledesma on Twitter and he says NRBQ had no involvement in the episode at all: "Nope, tune composed & recorded by Alf Clausen, sung by Dan Castellammare, based on "We Didn't Start the Fire" by Billy Joel". So I'm going to go ahead and remove them. How far are we from an FLC? Gran2 14:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Great! We just need to add WP:ALT to each image (I'll start some now) and copy edit the written content for any prose. Otherwise, it's all good for a nomination -- though I don't think I can co-nominate once Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Friends episodes/archive1 gets resolved. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 14:38, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Love's Labor Lost (ER)

How come the nominee for Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Guest Actress in a Drama Series was not listed among the guest actors? Are you working from the right list?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:11, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Copied the list from the closing credits. Bit odd, her name doesn't come up but she is in the episode. Will add. – Lemonade51 (talk) 10:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited The One with the Embryos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Courtney Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Friends GA

I just finished reviewing the Friends article you submitted for GA. Just a couple kinks before it can be promoted. :) Cheers.--Gen. Quon (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, will get started. - Lemonade51 (talk) 21:53, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lemonade51/Archive_3&oldid=1258059142"