User talk:L3X1/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions about User:L3X1. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Please comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Army (Poland). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Capitalization of Is

See MOS:CT. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of elected and appointed female heads of state

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of elected and appointed female heads of state. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment

Note: Please comment on this discussion on how we will name the navbox groupings. If after one (1) week no one has commented, then the suggestions listed will be applied to the groupings. Thanks, Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Needless revert

Hi. On the Kashmiris page you have needlessly changed hundreds of words when the conflict is only over one word. I am changing it back. Losthistory9 (talk) 02:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Sory Losthistory9, I couldn't determine what would be considered a good version. Thanks for reverting me, I should of looked harder or left it. Going offline for 12, L3X1 (distant write) 02:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:European Graduate School

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:European Graduate School. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Notability of schools

Hi L3X1. I just spotted your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Andrew's Secondary School, Adikpo that schools are "automatically notable", and thought I should make you aware of the outcome of this RfC. Perhaps you meant that you personally consider schools automatically notable, which is fine, but the RfC dismissed the idea that schools are presumed to be notable. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Cordless Larry, I was referring to how I read NSCHOOL (subset of ORG) and footnote 7 of WP:N. L3X1 (distant write) 19:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps I've misunderstood you, but I don't really see how either of those can be interpreted to mean that schools are automatically notable. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

They don't. - Sitush (talk) 20:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Cordless Larry & Sitush My apologies, I reread the policies, and checked both current and previous revisions: schools aren't automatically notable. Looks like I need to a do a general policy refresher. L3X1 (distant write) 18:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Too many policies, too many nuances, too many changes. It's no wonder we all get in such a mess. - Sitush (talk) 18:28, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

My welcome

Thank you for the welcome. As you might be able to tell, I'm already gaining a bit of proficiency in using templates and such. As such, how does one use a piped link like {{dl|Barnyard|film}} as is normally used on the YPPedia? SnivyFan1995 (talk) 16:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

SnivyFan1995 I'm not sure, but I think they are used when renaming a link (science) and separating between templates. L3X1 (distant write) 18:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

New RfC at Plummer v. State

There is a new RfC at Plummer v. State RfC, dealing with the Internet meme section. Please visit and comment on the proposed language for the section. This is revised from the first proposal, and you are receiving this notice due to your participation in the first RfC. GregJackP Boomer! 20:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

I corrected the formatting on your support !vote (one apostrophe was missing), feel free to revert. GregJackP Boomer! 21:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Barack Obama

Maybe it's best to close joke afds manually. Siuenti (talk) 01:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Siuenti I realise that now, sorry about that weirdness. I have really no idea why it deleted so much. I've disallowed any automatics edits in XFDcloser. L3X1 (distant write) 01:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

It's probably because the article didn't have an afd template so it got confused. Siuenti (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Poole St. Bridge at Kep Track

The Poole st bridge, which is near the eastern head of the Kep track is closed due to flooding, the Avon bridge is closed for repair, the suspension pedestrian bridge is only just recognised on google maps — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucyhonan (talk • contribs) 12:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a directory, so the detour, though helpful, is out of place. L3X1 (distant write) 13:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Nope.

A mistake was made — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucyhonan (talk • contribs) 15:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Keep up the great work

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your steadfast efforts to ensure the trash gets taken out from this encyclopedia, I hereby award you this Barnstar of Reversion. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 20:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. L3X1 (distant write) 21:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gaslighting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gaslighting. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Dyfed-Powys Police

Hi, I edited the name of the Chief Constable to Mark Collins as he has now taken over from Simon Prince (who has retired). This can be verified at the following internet page ^[1]

I will therefore re-apply the update as it is relevant, accurate and constructive.

Samw783 (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Samw783 OK, I apologise for reverting your edit. L3X1 (distant write) 15:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

That's OK, I understand that standards have to be upheld. Thanks for getting back to me. Samw783 (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

References

^ https://www.dyfed-powys.police.uk/en/about-us/who-we-are/whos-who/

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your recent edit

Regarding this edit. Just a short while ago I made this report. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Magnolia677 That's how I got Boomboom's edits. I think admin action will be taken against the user in question, but I don't think it will be quick and easy. I'm investigating that RS claim, and they are trodding on some fine lines re: Instagram. L3X1 (distant write) 22:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Just to note that I've made a lot of sourced edits, like the ones shown here, here, here, here and more, its just that Magnolia677 is convinced that I am another blocked editor named Xboxmanwar (which I'm not) and solely using this as an excuse to try to get me blocked, also whenever Magnolia677 was proven wrong by another editor and/or doesn't care to back up their statements, they don't tend to respond, they did it to me and other editors editing in the music genre. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 23:05, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Corey Stewart (politician)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Corey Stewart (politician). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion invite

Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 06:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

NA COM

Just so you know, there is no need to label yourself this way when commenting at AN or ANI. Despite the names, these are community discussion boards and any and all input is permitted and welcome. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Erik Prince

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erik Prince. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Recent "vandalism" un-edit

Regarding [recent edit on the Medicine section of List of Mnemonics]

Hi, I'm new to wikipedia editing, so please excuse me if this is in the wrong area or if I come across as inexperienced

My edit was flagged as vandalism just for the fact that it contained a slang term for the word "breasts". I certainly don't think this should result in a permanent ding on my account that may result in a permanent ban if it happens again, especially when you consider a.) The new mnemonic I edited in is equally accurate and b.) The new mnemonic is far more common/widespread use in today's medical education

For evidence of (b), try this experiment. Google these:

1. "some say marry money but my brother says big business makes money" ---Hits = 395

2. "some say marry money but my brother says big b***s matter more" ---Hits = 5,150

The new mnemonic that I edited in has over 10x more hits. It also just makes more sense, if you compare them.

Regardless, it was an edit made in good faith, not to vandalize. I don't think that policy should apply to this edit. 中国的中东人 (talk) 20:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

My apologies 中国的中东人, I have removed the warning from your talk page. L3X1 (distant write) 23:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you :) Is this what we're supposed to do if the bot detects vandalism? I was afraid just clicking "Undo" would cause another ding and some red alarms would come on and scare me.中国的中东人 (talk) 08:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

中国的中东人 The bot is called ClueBot NG, and how it detects vandalism, I'm not too sure. If someone reverts your edit, it is a good idea to bring up the issue with them. Wikipedia has a policy called WP:BRD:Bold, Revert, Discuss. It talks about how being bold is making a change, and if someone reverts it, then to dicuss it. You did that with me and it worked out well. L3X1 (distant write) 21:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1873 in Germany

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1873 in Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Erik Prince

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erik Prince. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Ravish K

re. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Not_sure_if_this_is_the_right_place._Found_a_Wikipedia_user_is_posting_for_pay

Is the master account not just User:Kavdiaravish? If the old accounts (as identified from Sam Walton's table) had been added to the SPI at the time, a Checkuser could have been done to identify old accounts, which would have simplified the process of finding edited articles a lot easier? Or am I missing something? jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Jcc I don't know which is the master account, I am still trying to figure out all the information from the table and the archived SPIs. L3X1 (distant write) 01:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Safe Seat

Hello , L3X1! I recently made an edit to the safe seat page and made it include my riding, which is a tory safe seat as it has only been held by two Liberals in 102 years. I'm not an experienced editor; in fact this was my first edit. I'd just like to know what exactly it was I did wrong so that I can re-add this information without the error, and so I won't repeat it in the future. I ensure you that my intent was not to vandalize. Thanks, Haywalk (talk) 00:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)haywalk

My apologies Haywalk, I see nothing wrong with your edit, and have restored it. I had made a mistake, thank you for alerting me. L3X1 (distant write) 01:05, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sudhanshu6454

Hello. Please note that this case has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhishek4889, so I have removed your report. If you wish to proceed, please resubmit your evidence at the new location. Thank you. —DoRD (talk) 02:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks DoRD How would I go about doing that? I used Twinkle to submit Sud. L3X1 (distant write) 02:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

The easiest way, at this point, would be to simply copy what you added here to the new page. To resubmit with TW, do as you did before, but use the correct sockmaster's name (Abhishek4889) instead. —DoRD (talk) 02:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Draft talk:US Presidents navbox

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Draft talk:US Presidents navbox. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David Ferrie

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Ferrie. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

CSD

With regards to your comment in this edit: no, this is completely wrong, and if this is your view then you shouldn't be marking things for speedy deletion. The article you tagged was extremely stubby, but "being very stubby" is not a CSD criterion, and not in any way related to the total nonsense tags you chose. WP:CSD is completely clear:

The criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus to bypass deletion discussion, at their discretion, and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media. They cover only the cases specified in the rules here. ... Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases. ... Contributors sometimes create pages over several edits, so administrators should avoid deleting a page that appears incomplete too soon after its creation.

(My bold.) "Creative" tagging is completely at odds with both the spirit and the letter of this policy. Don't do it. (David Eppstein's admonitions are also totally valid.) --JBL (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abraham

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abraham. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Yo

I was trying to write on the University of Missouri Med School page about their accreditation history problems over a number of years of articles. A similar section is on another school page. I think it was deleted without cause and then I had to talk to this girl for a long time, but could not make any progress on the article. Anything you could do to help? would really appreciate. Much thanks. Vitamindaughter (talk) 21:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

About becoming an administrator

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

Have you ever thought of becoming an administrator? It can be enjoyable, challenging, and a great way to help Wikipedia.

If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote of confidence, Anna Frodesiak. Most people I have seen said that admins should have of been around for 6 months or more, and I have really only been heavy editing for 4.5. When do you think I should submit a ORCP? Sooner or later? L3X1 (distant write) 02:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello there. Well, there's no harm in taking the poll anytime, and multiple times. The feedback can give good guidance on what areas need improvement. It's all up to you. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Erik Prince

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erik Prince. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charlie Chaplin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Charlie Chaplin. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Reminder

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

You're welcome! Also: help!

I remember that The Troubles have been a sore spot on here forever so I'm wanting to toe the line here. If we conclude that my revert at Bobby Sands needs to be fully or partially undone, am I good to revert myself or is it so sensitive that they might block me for that? I'm looking at the list of rules and restrictions and there's nothing to help me. City Of Silver 01:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

CityOfSilver I'm thinking it will be okay if you self revert. I think that if you modified your revert, it definitely wouldn't count; there appears to be no limit on the number of edits. It is a pity about the ES restriction, as it has cut several of my own rants short :). L3X1 (distant write) 01:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. This conversation seems like it'll go longer than 24 hours but violating 1RR is the sort of dopey thing that I'd find a way to accidentally do and finally get myself blocked. City Of Silver 01:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Am I the only person who goes through edit summaries, picking out all the automatic text that isn't absolutely necessary because I need more room to spit hot fire?) I will even mince wrds & resort to symbols and bad spelling to get more room. L3X1 (distant write) 01:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Johanna Nordblad

Hello L3X1. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Johanna Nordblad, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Guinness World Record holder ist a sufficient claim of significance. Thank you. So Why 15:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Logan (film)

You have reverted my edit, the reason i edited it, is because she is not a female clone within the context of this movie. The director and the major plot of this movie has confirmed that she is his biological daughter, which this plot synopsis seems to leave out. Plus 99.99 % of this movie does not call her a clone but they have it under her character(which that is unsourceful in the context of this film),it even contradicts it self because under the plot description(like in the movie plot it states they were bred from DNA, which breeding and cloning are two contradicting things. Eddie8889 (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Eddie8889 My apologies for misunderstanding you. As another editor has worked on the article, you'll have to hand re-insert the correct facts. Thanks for helping, and putting up with me. L3X1 (distant write) 02:46, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

April Fools closes

Just fixing tool labs. Hope you don't mind me changing your closes. J 947^{^{^(c)}} 23:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

J947 No problem, thanks. L3X1 (distant write) 02:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Noël Coward

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Noël Coward. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Oshwah

Why the hell did you close that thread? Even if nothing untoward is going on, the distribution of edits is concerning. Someone should tell the guy to get enough rest now and again - 3 hours sleep in a 48 hour period is not healthy. 82.132.234.75 (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

And I see you reported me to WP:AIV for "trolling". I'm going to revert your bad faith non-admin closure of that thread, and have reported you to AIV myself. Good grief man. 82.132.234.75 (talk) 22:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

I prefer to address people by name. L3X1 (distant write) 23:28, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tsolak Bekaryan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tsolak Bekaryan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your HR

You might read WP:DENY and WV:SHRINE. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 00:29, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Tarl_N. Thanks for reminding me, U1 requested. D.G. L3X1 (distant write) 01:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

personal attacks on Hitler are ok?

Yeah, but you have to call him by his secret code name, "Godwin". Anmccaff (talk) 04:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sheela Murthy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sheela Murthy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Here

...should you care to read, is my response to the tagging Noticeboard issue, in which you recently expressed opinion. For fairness, and completeness. Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 10:22, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Mee Canyon

You reverted my change of the words "cave" to "alcove" in the Wikipedia entry for Mee Canyon. There is a significant difference between the two of these terms and the change I made is absolutely a useful and constructive one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.45.168.107 (talk) 03:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antonio Margarito

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antonio Margarito. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Day-care sex-abuse hysteria

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Day-care sex-abuse hysteria. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Poke d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 18:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Cao Bang (1979)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Cao Bang (1979). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

stay back bot! d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 18:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments at AFD and RFCs....

Of late, I have seen you actively participating in WP:RFC and WP:AFD .But regretably, most of your votes are either way too short or way too rhetorical; devoid of any minimal rationale; thus making them prime candidates to not assign any weightage to.Thus, I would appreciate if you could kindly take a kind look through WP:AADD and increase the productivity of your valuable work.Thanks!Winged Blades^Godric 17:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Who is above you?

Who is above you, as in who authorises you, l3xi?

The policies of Wikipedia. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 02:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

You're currently online, failure to respond will reflect poorly on you, when I finally get to inform those above you, of your behaviour...

I just went offline. Try WP:ANI. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 02:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Last chance... I asked you a direct question, a direct answer will do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.53.51.129 (talk) 02:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm not L3X1, but I'm watching this conversation with some bemusement. He did answer you - if you believe an editor (such as him) has overstepped his bounds, the venue for complaining is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The shortcut is WP:ANI. However, seeing his revert of your change to Get Out, I don't believe you will find much benefit in complaining there. Indeed, you might find yourself a recipient of a WP:BOOMERANG ban, since it looks like your edit was indeed poor and deserved to be reverted. Removing citations when changing an article is almost never good. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 02:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of living centenarians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of living centenarians. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Question

Hi, L3X1. Just wondering: The ANI issue "RazzSazz BLP vios at Alia Janine" was archived here without it being resolved one way or the other; usually when an issue is dismissed, the admin will say something like "no violation found" or "issue is stale." I was wondering why there was no resolution here, given the BLP nature of the issue particularly. Thank you for any help or information. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Oops! Tenebrae, that was a mistake on my part, I am working on restoring it to the board. Thanks for pointing this out. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 14:50, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Restored. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 14:53, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

eszett tranliteration to ss in English

The German ligature eszett does not exist in English and is normally although not universally transliterated as "ss" in Wiki. I have reverted edit reversion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CEAB:93D0:49C8:1662:D67:88F3 (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

PS the TITLE of the article uses "ss" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CEAB:93D0:49C8:1662:D67:88F3 (talk) 02:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

I was sure that the ß was kept, but I cannot find any policy stating so. Thanks for changing this. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 13:09, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ned Kelly

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ned Kelly. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Janweh64/Rules of conduct

Just as a courtesy, I wanted to inform you, I have nominated this user sandbox for deletion. I do not see the benefit in placing myself under further editing restriction, giving more weapons for my harassers. I appreciate your encouragement, but I am returning to defensive stance. —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Janweh64 Ok, thanks for letting me know. Sorry things aren't working out. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 17:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tupac Shakur

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tupac Shakur. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Supreme Court of the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Supreme Court of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Draft talk:Jonna Mannion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Draft talk:Jonna Mannion. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

iN SATMAR CUSTODY

I WAS PART OF THIS STORY. THIS FILM IS A FARCE WITH A NOT SO HIDDEN AGENDA. MY EDIT IS ONLY CORRECTING THE RECORD SOMEWHAT. YOU CAN EMAIL ME FOR MORE INFO AT MGKBHW@GMAIL.COM — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.56.202.70 (talk) 11:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

shrunk due to allcaps. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 20:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

userfying joke wiki pages

It'd be fine with me, so long as the pages were kept as redirects. They're not likely to ever be used in any seriousness (although the alphabet soup redirect at WP:EYDL might, but we can keep it as a redirect to the blockhammer page until then). ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:39, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Ok, thanks MjolnirPants, I'll wait to userfy till somebody raises issues with it. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 20:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

A Wanted Man Edit Question

How is my edit not constructive? First of all my edit is what actually appears in the book. Secondly the difference between saying one sentence and talking for a minute is quite important. It is trivial to come up with a sentence that does not have the letter A (e.x. He runs slowly.), therefore it does not make sense as a puzzle. Talking for a whole minute without the letter A is a legitimate puzzle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.140.163 (talk) 02:56, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Bundy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Bundy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Generally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI :"Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. DES ^(talk) 23:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC) This is in regard to User:THISISAJOKECAUSEWTF. DES ^(talk) 23:58, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry to cause extra work, will wait until they have edited unless they are even more egrigous than this. Indeffed by The-Anome. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 19:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

ANI closure

[1]. Three things: Firstly, who are to close a discussion at ANI? Secondly, who posts a question in the form of a closing comment where there is no prospect of a right of reply? Finally, where did I call OID stupid? As you say, diffs please? Cassianto ^Talk 18:59, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I'll ignore the whole who-are-you-to-do-what thing. I have reopened the An/I discussion, this can furthered either here or there (doing it here saves you the trouble of pinging me, but it is more private). Does this comment look familiar:

Please mind your own business. Your stupid comments are not helping the situation. Cassianto ^Talk 10:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

You don't link to any of his "stupid comments", which were the diffs I was requesting. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 19:08, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Again, which part of my comment refers to OID being stupid? From what I can see, I called his comment stupid. Great people can say stupid things; just as stupid people can say great things. I know you're desperate to be an admin, but you must really think before you type. Cassianto ^Talk 19:47, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I apologise for jumping to the conclusion that by degrading the comment you were judging the editor. I do fail to see how his comment is stupid. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 20:03, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Sarah and others were trying to end the drama and said so numerous times. Then along comes OID with a comment that was designed to fan the flames further. It was not needed; did not benefit the discussion in the slightest; and came across as grave dancing and condescending. That was why it was stupid. Cassianto ^Talk 20:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political decoy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political decoy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Presidency of Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

NPR

Please do not tag-bomb articles as you did at The Women’s Crusade of 1873-1874. Try and do some minor clean ups yourself and not tag articles without leaving a note for the creator. Otherwise, unless deleted, the article is likely to remain tagged and/or unreferenced forever. For more information, please read the tutorial again. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Kudpung For my enlightenment, which tags were inappropriate? d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 12:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I didn't say any tags were inappropriate. Looks like other patrollers have already cleaned up for you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Diamond Foundry

Please be aware of a discussion I started at WP:ANI regarding this article. Home Lander (talk) 01:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, Home Lander. I agree the message on the talk page is weird. I accepted the article in Page Curation because of notability, so I don't think ti will be deleted this time. Thanks for your diligence in catching it. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 01:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I really don't care about the page, just curious about the background of the creating user. An account that hasn't edited in nine years suddenly appearing to re-create something months after re-creation by a banned user seems to indicate a compromised account. Home Lander (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I think it would be more likely to be a sleeper than hacked, but I have no experience in the detection and confirmation of compromised account to be sure. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 01:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Stub sorting

When new page patrolling, please stub sort instead of using {{stub}}. Thanks. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Laura Prepon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Laura Prepon. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of unusual deaths

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of unusual deaths. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emmett Till

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emmett Till. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

sig v5 d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 02:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hasan Salama

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hasan Salama. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

the attack page I cannot name because it is an attack

Thanks for pointing out the edit summary.Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello L3X1,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 804 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

FIguring out how to get every reviewer is the hard part. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 16:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I declined your speedy deletion nomination of User:RiyazJalaluddinkhan because it did not appear to be unambiguously promotional. I don't know much about the process so I didn't do it myself, but it looks like a page that might fall under WP:FAKEARTICLE. Also, on a general categorization note, I changed your db-reason nomination of User:Ericmarshall/sandbox under G11 and potential copyvio to a db-g11 with an additional rationale parameter - hope you don't mind. Appable (talk | contributions) 17:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Writin' dirty

It would be better as "Writin' dirty" with an apostrophe and no "g". None of the others have "g"s. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 20:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Thanks, d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 23:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gisele Bündchen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gisele Bündchen. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Stunde Null

Do not revert my edit. The World Wars should be written with Roman numerals, not "One" and "Two". 2602:306:CFEA:170:157B:98AE:56E6:BEBA (talk) 02:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

MOS:BADDATE We don't use Roman Numerals. And please do not be so high and mighty. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 02:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ali Hassan Salameh

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ali Hassan Salameh. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shneur Odze

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shneur Odze. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

List of Nostalgia Critic (2012) Not an error

The edits I made were not vandalism. Please watch this video for further proof. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhdBtUA2wJc --174.27.10.144 2:16 28 May 2017 (UTC)

I'll look into it in a little bit. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 02:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Murder of Seth Rich

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Murder of Seth Rich. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Reactions to the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Reactions to the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

hello how are

hello how are you Ercanaslan (talk) 01:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Just fine, Ercanaslan. However, your promotional activities go against policy. Wikipedia is not the place fo advertising sexual websites. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Bir yıldız da sizin için!

	Özgün Yıldız
	I just want my group to go out on about in facebook Ercanaslan (talk) 01:42, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately that is not possible. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Pages needing translation into English

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Pages needing translation into English. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on File talk:Einstein and Locker-Lampson.jpeg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on File talk:Einstein and Locker-Lampson.jpeg. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fabolous

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fabolous. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Legobot Ahem, I made it! d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 13:28, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

The future of NPP and AfC/Work group

Hi L3X1,

In view of the huge and sudden backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed since mid 2016, the WMF has begun a dialogue in a quest to examine the situation and possible solutions. Please consider commenting there if you have not already done so. It is highly recommended to read it all before it becomes too long to follow. The project is at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Analysis and proposal, and its talk page.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kolkata Derby

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kolkata Derby. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Timeline of events related to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timeline of events related to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

csdG10

Not sure that applies to <wait for it> sponges.😜Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Dlohcierekim Haha, I meant g11 must of mis-pressed the Twinkle button. Thanks for getting it, d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 23:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:McMahon–Hussein Correspondence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:McMahon–Hussein Correspondence. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Beautiful but Dangerous

Regarding the entry of Beautiful but Dangerous (Italian film), the site had been vandalized by someone who wrote the same name on every line in the credits box as a joke. I used info from imdb.com to correct the page, and I fixed it. Now you reverted it back to the vandalized page!!!!!! Look at the two pages and you'll see that I FIXED it, I corrected the vandalism!! Now it's all messed up again. - frank — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.129.15.71 (talk) 17:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vladimir Lenin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Vladimir Lenin. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, مركز عرب واى, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Adam9007 (talk) 23:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russo-Georgian War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russo-Georgian War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Americassuitehearts

If you check this user's contributions, he's been going to different articles and deleting references to 5 Second of Summer. This is not a good faith edit, it's vandalism. Watch out for him. — Myk Streja ^{[citation needed]} 02:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Winnipeg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Winnipeg. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bob Stoops

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bob Stoops. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Session

Thank you for reviewing my page about sessions! Would love it if you could review/patrol my other new unreviewed articles, too. Climate7298 (talk) 01:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Climate7298 I must say that your cricket related articles are very good. Keep it up! :) I do think that SS Sunridges Ton should be merged into Sareen Sports Industries, as I cannot find anything on Google to set it apart from SS. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

L3X1 That is super nice of you to say! I guess it just comes down to my passion for the game and this is my way to express it :) I agree with you about merging those two articles. I created the bat page first, and then realized it was more customary in the corpus to have an article about the manufacturer itself, so I created that later (esp after another commenter suggested it). I do think that article about the manufacturer should stay up since a lot of the manufacturers have articles, but I'm not overly attached to it if others think otherwise. Thank you again for all your reviews! I'll try to keep it up ;) Climate7298 (talk) 17:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi L3X1! An article I wrote is contested. Would appreciate you weighing in if possible! Climate7298 (talk) 03:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Gautam gulati

Gautam gulati: He was also casted for the movie 'Behen hogi teri' starring rajkumar and shruti haasan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.44.51.248 (talk) 02:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Forgeting to sign on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang

You had forgot to sign while comment on the talk page, so I helped you doing that. Sorry if it had caused any inconvenience. Dino nam (talk) 08:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for doing that for me :) d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 13:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mohun Bagan A.C.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohun Bagan A.C.. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Melania Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Melania Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Seeking for some help

Wanna ask you personally to help on these two issues:

Please stop Tnguyen4321 making disruptive editing on Battle of Ia Drang.
Please stop him harassing me by his baseless warnings on my talk page.

I've tried issuing two reports on those so far on WP:AN/I but it hasn't been fruitful so far. I'm still trying to be civil though, so I'm asking for your help. Thanks! Dino nam (talk) 07:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Pages needing translation into English

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Pages needing translation into English. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Spurs v the Spurs

Colloquialisms do not always follow rules in an absolute watertight way. "The Spurs" tends to be speech and may be too colloquial for an encyclopedia. Britmax (talk) 07:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Just to clarify, Britmax, it's not so much that it's a colloquialism as that it's the wrong colloquialism. I've only ever heard "the Spurs" used by Americans or others used to American English treatment of team names. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:24, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Harrison

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Harrison. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anti-Hinduism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anti-Hinduism. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dobruja

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dobruja. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Misuse of tools

Please explain this misuse by you of tools. Thanks. --2604:2000:E016:A700:9160:5D0B:34EE:82CF (talk) 03:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for improving that article, sorry about my mistake. I misunderstood what you were doing. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:00, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I would have thought it was self-evident. Please do not use the tools until you are comfortable that you will not make such mistakes in the future. Thanks. --2604:2000:E016:A700:195:382D:CC2E:2D92 (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

COI for inhabitants?

Hi Home Lander. I am writing this here so as to not confuse the editor you are in conversation with on your talk page, RF Smith, who said …resident who through volunteering efforts and interest in my community (along with the help of other residents)… I noticed that you stated (or seemed to state, at least to me) that living in the municipality was a COI. As I write I realize that he may perhaps be implying that he is part of some town-promoting group, which is definitely COI. If that is what Smith meant then sorry for the misunderstanding. I bring this up because when I was a new page patroller, I ran across an article which was written by a resident. I tagged it with COI, and PamD wrote: …no evidence of COI (if living in a place counted as a COI then practically every town or village article would be so labeled)… written in my pre-April Archive on 3/21, it is #87 in the Table of Contents if the link doesn't take you to the full conversation. So if Smith is just a resident and not affiliated with any town-boosting schemes, I disagree with your statement This is absolutely a conflict of interest. Thank for reading this, d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 03:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello L3X1, thanks for tagging me. I definitely get the feeling that the user is part of a town-promoting group. There was actually one other user - Lakeviewer411 - who I first reverted due to addition of promotional content. After the revert, RF Smith began re-adding the content in a similar fashion, so I notified both users regarding the COI and sock/meatpuppetry policy. The material they are attempting to add is very promotional in nature - see their post at the talk page - I haven't been on for the past couple of days but I'm thinking that I'm probably not the one who should continue handling their request. You seem to have a keen eye on the COI policy; if you wouldn't mind, could you by chance engage the user at the article talk page? Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 17:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Task Force Tips

Thanks for your thanks for my efforts to find sources for the AfD. Have you reviewed them? I'm afraid I'm not getting through to the various participants how important this company is to firefighting technology, so if you think I've found enough to change your mind, please don't hesitate to pop back in to the AfD and say so.... Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Jclemens Based off what I have found and what you and Tony pulled up, I !voted keep. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 13:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:James Jamerson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James Jamerson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Qaboos bin Said al Said

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Qaboos bin Said al Said. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bosaso

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bosaso. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

I saw your ES. DNTR much? d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

I think you left a "not" out of that sentence...

"rumors about a persons sexuality should be given undue weight in Wikipedia" --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

I did! Thanks for telling me. d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 17:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Meesaya Murukku reversion

moved from top of page

I really can't understand why did you revert my changes on MEESAYA MURUKU. I need a valid reason. Sanjay CJ (talk) 16:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sanjay CJ. I reverted your edit becasuse …a lead singer known popular as… is not proper English grammar. The correct phrasing would be …a lead singer popularly known as…. Thanks, d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 17:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Robert Gant

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Gant. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hal Sparks

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hal Sparks. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Forbes Cowan

It's true google it, was big news at the time! But I don't how to reference it but it explains his 5 year competetion gap some readers may wonder about. If you could do the referencing etc...

I'll look at it.d.g. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 17:44, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Matthew Gordon Banks

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Matthew Gordon Banks. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism?

That wasn't vandalism. It was a relevant source pertaining to the given topic. Explain to me how it was vandalism, please? 2601:84:4502:61EA:848A:6589:7412:3A6D (talk) 19:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for calling your edit vandalism,a s ti was done in good faith. The fragment and source doesn't belong on the end of the sentence, because the sentence is not about a decrease or increase in hate crimes, so saying "hate crimes against Jews have remained common" it out of place. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 21:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cristiano Ronaldo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cristiano Ronaldo. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle for Caen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle for Caen. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Latest reversion

Hey there, L3X1:

This diff shows you reverting an unsourced edit, but the source is right there and the edit matches the source. The original entry is a typo, maybe? — Myk Streja ^(what?) 01:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Myk Streja, it probably is. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Cool! A mannerly reaction to me pointing out something! (Sorry, I've had a really bad day, and you just made my day.) — Myk Streja ^(what?) 01:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Harry Lauder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Harry Lauder. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Emijrp/All Human Knowledge. Drmies has already expressed to you how your language in this MfD was inappropriate. Complaining of a cabal and leaving edit summaries that seem intended to provoke others is inappropriate. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

TonyBallioni I was not and am not complaining of a cabal. I'm responding to Lugnut, Paleo, and TheDJ. There is an essay somewhere which says something along the lines of those who complain about cabals are merely part of them. What I am complaining is the lack of debate/discussion going on at the MfD. I start trying to get a discussion going yesterday, get shut down after comment #3, and then today SL drops a duplicate borderline rude (IMO) message to 7 different editors. I assume you're referring to my ES: not worth my time to reply to vague sarcasm. If BMK means what I think he does, then I interpret it as being accused of being a little whiner who says that anyone who doesn't agree with him is an evil cabal. That is not what I said nor what I meant. To me, if anything was provoking in that sub-thread, it would be the sarcastic comment, wouldn't it? I see this MfD as really bringing out the inner a-hole in a lot of us (no, I am not calling you that, nor am I angry with you), which believe me doesn't swell my heart with pride. Indeed, I thank you for coming here and bringing your concerns to my attention, I don't want to be known as "That jackass L3x1", and if my behavior is out of line then I can fix it. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 20:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Its the 4th of July so don't feel the need to rush a response, I'll be on all day today and tomorrow. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 20:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Speaking of rude, that's how your response to me came across. I'll assume it wasn't meant that way.--S Philbrick (Talk) 21:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

No, it wasn't…I can never figure out to word those. I guess I'll just use substd:Unsigned L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 21:36, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi L3, sure. First off, I'm not mad either, I just thought after the discussion with Drmies about the same MfD and similar ones with Iridescent followed by this conversation with Iridescent and Ponyo that it made sense to point it clearly in this case that the comments probably weren't that constructive.
Re: the edit summaries, yes, while I think adding that edit summary was particularly bad judgement when you were fixing a typo, this one and this one, when taken together with some that had been pointed out to you in the past at the links above show this is an area you could work on.
While the cabal comment could easily be read to imply that those editors who agree with Softlavender are also toxic (it takes more than one to form a cabal). I also think this relates to what you are expecting from a discussion. To me it appears you are using it to mean people who start off disagreeing end up agreeing, and are assuming that those who hold strong to their views aren't engaging in good faith. To use a real life example, short of a miracle, no amount of discussion with Peter Singer will ever get me anywhere near his views on how animals play into the moral economy. I think his views are wrong even though I acknowledge they are well thought out. That's okay, and it doesn't make any discussion we might have less of a discussion.
I think BMK was bluntly trying to hint at the two discussions I linked to with Iridescent above. I wouldn't have phrased it that way, but I do think he has a point that as a (former?) ANI regular, assuming good faith on others has the benefit of people assuming it for you. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

E-cig

I have worked on many e-cig drafts. This one is not my first. If you count all my edits including my draft edits it is well above 4,000 edits. Lol. QuackGuru (talk) 18:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Wow! L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 19:24, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm the only editor expanding the main page and subpages (with severely massive sourced content). I created new pages and new pages were created because the main page got too big. It is very simple. Just click "save changes". QuackGuru (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of ClueBot NG for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ClueBot NG is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ClueBot NG until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. groig (talk) 22:54, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Mystical marriage of Saint Catherine

Hello. You have a new message at 142.160.131.202's talk page. 142.160.131.202 (talk) 02:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Page_mover

Hi there. I have granted your page mover user right. It seems like you rely a bit much on automated edits, but since you participate in discussions, it should be fine. Continue with the good work! Alex Shih ^Talk 16:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 16:31, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mary Jane Girls

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mary Jane Girls. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Duke discography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Duke discography. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Botsum

In regards {{Botsum}}, my feeling is if something's worth doing, it's worth doing right. I encourage you to contribute with an eye to perfection. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	For your gracious conduct over the past few days. Jupitus Smart 03:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox economist

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox economist. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Longquan celadon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Longquan celadon. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sean Combs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Combs. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Redirects of film titles to film directors

Hi L3X1, a redirect of a film that has no article yet to its director, like this one makes it difficult for WP:Film/missing films to keep track of missing film articles, because they appear in our list as blue links. There is no guideline for this, but if you cound let them as red links it would help. Thank you. Hoverfish Talk 18:09, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Hoverfish, I am sorry about that. I set them for deletion under G7 as I am not ready to write the article. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 18:38, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, nothing to be sorry about. Cheers. Hoverfish Talk 18:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Syrian Civil War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello L3X1, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:

Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mount Athos

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mount Athos. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Algiers expedition (1541)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Algiers expedition (1541). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Reviewed?

Hi there L3X1! I'm new to Wikipedia and was wondering what it means that you've "reviewed" my userpage? Thanks in advance! wandelwiki^talk 01:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

(by talk page stalker) @Wandelwiki: Because of the Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident, we have New Page Patrol to make sure new pages (like your userpage) wasn't problematic. No worries. Chris Troutman (talk) 03:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it means an editor has checked to make sure it ok. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 13:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Randy Quaid

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Randy Quaid. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Attack on Prekaz

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Attack on Prekaz. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Ghetto

I'm looking for clarification of your edit regarding the Ghetto page. You said you edited the link but you also deleted "Many people refer to Gaza as a Ghetto though this is hotly debated. A film was made in 1984 documenting this claim called Gaza Ghetto". Can you tell me why? A film called Gaza Ghetto from 1984 clearly establishes that Gaza has been called a Ghetto for over 30 years. I plan to make a more detailed entry on the subject in the future but was surprised to see this deletion. I look forward your response. 2600:6C5E:7005:500:CDD0:6A51:7A88:D407 (talk) 23:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

I was too hasty in my reverting, I have restored your edit and converted the link into an inline citation. Thanks, and sorry about that, L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 01:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dan Wagner

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dan Wagner. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Jackson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Jackson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elijah Daniel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elijah Daniel. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Eroadster

Plip!

You should really avoid relisting AFDs you participated in. Either !vote or relist, not both. Regards So Why 09:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for enlightening me, SoWhy, sorry about that. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 18:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

No problem. Relisting is, as WP:RELIST says, basically an administrative task (even if non-admins are allowed to do it), so WP:INVOLVED has to be followed by anyone relisting discussions. I'm not saying the discussion shouldn't have been relisted but if you comment in it and then relist, someone else might think you are relisting to gain more time for like-minded editors to !vote like you. Again, not saying you thought that, but the appearance of bias is sufficient to potentially create problems. Regards So Why 19:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White House Press Secretary

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White House Press Secretary. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Flag of Algeria

Hi Please reconsider your position. The flag is disputed an according for the others historians there are another flag. And I have seen that flag in any source. It is a pure invention of a contributor. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Will give it a think. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 21:25, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

So what are you suggesting since the proposed flag is not confirmed? Moreover, even with a historian's description, it is not possible to draw a flag with the exact colors, proportions and orientations of the patterns. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

I reread the RfC and now that I think I understand it better I agree with your idea for no flag and a direction to the proper article. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 22:04, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

this book has been writed on 2007. And Mouloud Gaïd, the author L'Algerie sous les Turcs died on 2000. So there is no evidence as to how was the flag and Gaid is also a great historian. Touati's opinion does not have the monopoly of historical truth. And for Touati, he used a traduction of Al Ghazavat. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Halimah Yacob

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Halimah Yacob. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Halimah Yacob

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Halimah Yacob. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Oliver

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Oliver. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic calendar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Review of user-space page

Hiya! I got a notification that you reviewed my pitiful awards page and I was wondering: what's up with that? Do people review user pages? Or is this something to do with vandalism patrols? Just curious. – Reidgreg (talk) 23:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Reidgreg A little of both. The Page Curation function at New Page Patrol has a setting for patrolling the userspace. I use it to check for copyright violations and advertising. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 00:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Interesting. One more area to possibly look into if I get a faster connection, and a little more experience. – Reidgreg (talk) 11:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ned Kelly

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ned Kelly. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jose Antonio Vargas

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jose Antonio Vargas. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lindy West

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lindy West. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

k

What does it mean that you reviewed my page? OakMiner (talk) 07:15, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't reply today. Will do tomorrow. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 00:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

hello OakMiner, my apologies for neglecting to respond earlier. Reviewed means a new page patroller has looked at the page to make sure it is not an attack page, business advert, or something innapropriate for the userspace of Wikipedia. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 21:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Gross. OakMiner (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

…Ok…L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 00:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Donald Trump series

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Donald Trump series. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bould Design

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bould Design requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

LOL Kleuske. Wish to reconsider? L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

I redirected instead. The man and the company are pretty much one and the same, I'm lead to believe by the sources. There's not much to be said about the comany that cannot be said in Fred Bould, who is notable, I agree. The article on the Nest thingamajig abounds in poor sourcing, 80% or more of the references, reference the company itself and the article seems more than just a little promotional in tone. Since you show an interest in the subject, you may want to address that. Kleuske (talk) 15:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I will try to improve the thermostat article as well. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dpnom

Template:Dpnom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Davey2010^Talk 23:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Relisting AfDs

Please review the following two pages: WP:NOQUORUM (a guideline) and WP:Relist bias (an essay I wrote, which is basically what I would write here as a bit of criticism). I saw that you relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMAC Accessibility, which had unanimous agreement for deletion among four editors with strong policy-based arguments. That is consensus to delete, and so it should not be relisted. Even if it were not consensus to delete, NOQUORUM would apply. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry BU Rob13, I had commented last night that I was wanted some time to look over the sources and then relisted it. Today I deleted my comment but forgot to delete the relist. Sorry for the trouble, and I will review the linked pages before doing more relisting. 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Ah, no worries. In that case, I'd recommend just commenting that you'd like more time rather than relisting. If you intend to review the sources as a closer, then it's best just to wait for another closer if you're heading offline (or get to it when you get back). If you intend to review the sources as a participant, then it's best not to relist (e.g. an administrative action) since you're somewhat involved. NOQUORUM explicitly states admins who believe the nomination may be controversial should not close as soft delete, so I would expect whichever admin who came along after you left such a comment to relist given your request. Hope this helps. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 18:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Summoned by bot

Please comment on Talk:Ted Kaczynski

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Kaczynski. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Massacre of Verden

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Massacre of Verden. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue Sky with a White Sun

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blue Sky with a White Sun. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Battle of Ia Drang. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Richard Nixon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard Nixon. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jared Taylor

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jared Taylor. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Birth date and age

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Birth date and age. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Notable YouTube channels

You might be interested in Weedtuber, which I created for WP:420. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:39, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ching Hai

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ching Hai. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Google's Ideological Echo Chamber. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cold War II

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biocom (2nd nomination)

Please consider reverting your close here. I think it was inappropriate for a non-admin to consider closing it because it was controversial and delete was a possible outcome: non-admins lack the delete function, so we are naturally going to be biased against a close we can't make. Letting a neutral admin assess this one based on policy is the best way to go in my opinion. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Doing. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 16:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, also re: your edit summary, while G6 might be the case for some XfD processes, at AfD the practice is that only sysops should close a discussion as delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meeting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Trump campaign–Russian meeting. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

COI - of a different kind

Hi L3X1. Because it involves New Page and AfC reviewers along with other maintenance workers (SPI, COIN), an informal chat has begun on some aspects of paid editing. See Conflict of Interest - of a different kind. Please add your thoughts there. It is not a debate or RfC.
From WP:NPPAFC. Opt-out. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC) .

Sure L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 14:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Third relists

Hey L3, I just wanted to drop you a quick a note because I have come across a number of AfDs that you've relisted lately. Several of them have been third relists, which according to WP:RELIST are generally meant as an extraordinary measure -- the exact wording is debates should not be relisted more than twice. So if you come across an AfD where the Lincoln-Douglas debates are going down after two relists, then that's definitely worth a third relist. But something like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sextones that only had two participants is probably best left to a no-consensus or a soft delete. Cheers! A Train^talk 20:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Budman DGG ( talk ) 21:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

AfD

Hi. Could you please refrain from relisting AfDs when the consensus is perfectly clear. It just makes work for every one. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk)

Yup, sorry. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Kudpung may be talking about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James D. Robinson IV. I was about to ask the same question. DGG ( talk ) 21:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

It wasn't actually, DGG, I was thinking of another one, but if I had seen it I would have voted and the consensus would have been even clearer. As it turns out, without the vote I never made, the actual close has left me thinking whether it was appropriate. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cold War II

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cold War II. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry to disturb you.

I noticed you marked a couple of my sandbox pages as reviewed. Is that a good or a bad thing? LampGenie01 (talk) 17:54, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Anytime :), LampGenie01. It is a good thing, you can check out New Pages Patrol for more information. L3X1 (distænt write) 21:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Seth MacFarlane

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Seth MacFarlane. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello L3X1, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.

Technology update:

Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox philosopher

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox philosopher. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Bosaso Talk Page

Please come to Bosaso talk page [[2]] and see the updates to your RFC. I found a book source that says the population of Bosaso city is 500,000

Thank you,

Faarax200 (talk) 12:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dina Powell

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dina Powell. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox scientist

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox scientist. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Just un-deprecate the thing. sames time. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:41, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Bundy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ted Bundy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jack Posobiec

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jack Posobiec. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bee Gees

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bee Gees. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

False vandalism claim in SLCPD wiki.

Posting something which is likely to be true and is based on a demonstrably true event doesn't meet the definition of Vandalism that you linked to. What is compelling you to censor information about the assault on a nurse by the SLC Police Department? If you disagree with the edit, say so, your claim of vandalism is bs.

Thats not at all what you did. You vandalised the article. L3X1 (distænt write) 19:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Theresa May

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theresa May. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Montgomery C. Meigs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Montgomery C. Meigs. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for the interruption, L3.

I would just want to ask: what does it mean to get my user sandbox reviewed?

Also, I apparently deleted my user sandbox information on accident, so I restored the draft that is in it. Cosecant57 (talk) 18:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

No problem, Cosecant57. When a page is reviewed it means that someone has checked to make sure it isn't an advertisment or a copyright Violation. New Page Patrol has more information. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:00, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Debbie Wasserman Schultz

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox writer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox writer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Not againz. 13:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Moors

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Moors. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David Ferrie

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Ferrie. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

William M. Branham

I don't know you but wonder if there is any way to get correct (Non-Bias) information back onto the William M. Branham page. Just wondering if there is something that can be done here. Back in 2014 I went to this page and it was fine: gave a correct story about the man, but recently I looked at it and it has many comments from anti-Branham people. I have tried to put some of the information back, only to have it quickly deleted. There is one man who stays in control of the site plus at least 2 others. Ten years after Branham's death Harrell wrote an accurate account of his life. 35 years after his death Weaver wrote another book calling him a liar and questioning many of the things that happened. There were several supernatural events, so if you're a staunch Baptist or something like that you may not wish to get involved. I understand that it is not politically correct to talk of miracles and healing. Sorry, I'm new to Wikipedia and don't know much about posting--just wanted to try to correct things that I could see were misleading and wrong. I tried to discuss changes with Darlig on the talk page (Newspaper Reference) but to no avail. I think I saw something on your page that shows how to see past edits. I would like to know how to do this. User:Danpeanuts 5:45, 5 September 2017

To see the past history of the page, you can either click the "View History" tab above the article or press Control+Option+H. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indian annexation of Hyderabad

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Indian annexation of Hyderabad. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence

L3X1 - I hope you know that you did absolutely the right thing by filing that ANI report today and expressing your concerns. If you see something and it makes you feel legitimate concern out of respect for another editor (such as the exact situation that you thought may be happening), I want you to know that you, without a doubt, can say something and speak up without fear that we'll look down upon you if you're wrong. I'd much rather you say something and have us find out that it's nothing to worry about, than to have you feel intimidated or afraid to speak up with the fear of any "repercussions" of being incorrect and say nothing at all. Thank you for keeping an eye out for other editors like you do. It's an excellent reminder that we're all on the same team, and that having each others' backs is one thing that makes Wikipedia a fun place to be apart of. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:34, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! L3X1 (distænt write)02:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bruce Harrell

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bruce Harrell. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ed Murray (Washington politician)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ed Murray (Washington politician). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Liberty University people

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Liberty University people. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dismissal of James Comey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dismissal of James Comey. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zoë Quinn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zoë Quinn. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

160th RFC to which I was (Summoned by bot)! 27 in Archive 1 and 124 in the CB3 archive. Lord High Permanent Senior Undersecretary to L3X1 (addressed as His Worshipfulness Lordy Lord) 04:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello L3X1, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thomas Rhett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thomas Rhett. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lee Rhiannon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lee Rhiannon. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 66.87.116.42 (talk) 13:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

I got a message from you saying my edit on Macho Man's song "Be A Man" was reversed. I never edited that page. I haven't edited anything. Why did I get this notification?

(talk page stalker)You may never have edited that page, but your IP address absolutely did. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

The statute of limitations is apparently longer than 7 months. 66.87, you may have a dynamic IP, which means your Internet Service Provider (ISP) assigns the same IP address to multiple computers over a period of time. L3X1 (distænt write) 15:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Nazism sidebar. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Special:Diff/801810055

Looks like you laid another warning right on top of mine with no intervening edits by the offending user. Just thought I'd mention it. Master of Time (talk) 00:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, Master of Time. Twinkle promised no edit conflicts, and it works!, I guess :) L3X1 (distænt write) 01:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quite an interestign character/troll as well, as the name, "Rebuker" would suggest. I have heard that it hath been said that minority groups were the biggest fans of The Apprentice, so s/he shot themselves in the foot by calling them "vulgar plebs".L3X1 (distænt write) 01:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alternative for Germany. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hi-pn0toad, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 21:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of monuments and memorials of the Confederate States of America

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of monuments and memorials of the Confederate States of America. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:H. L. Hunley (submarine)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:H. L. Hunley (submarine). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sex characteristics

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sex characteristics. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

French Language

Thanks for the message.

yes

But I will tell you that you must question the logic of Ethnologue its not accurate at all.

Think about it. France is population is 67 million, Switizerland's francophone population is about 2 million, Belgium's Francophone population is about 5 million, Canada's Francopopulation is around 9 million

67 + 2+5+9 = 83 million, which is more than 76 million.

However, after living in Cote d'ivoire and visiting many other african countries - there are sizable native francophone speakers in those countries. furthermore, wikpedia itself stated that the city of Adbijan and Libreville located in Africa have become majority first language francophone cities.

Given these fact; Ethnologue is inherently wrong and must be taken down. it does not at all give an accurate picture of the true native french speaking population.

you don;t even have to use sources just look at the facts based on reliable sources from other wikipedia pages.

Please comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Manny Pacquiao

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Manny Pacquiao. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Algerian War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Algerian War. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Old Norse religion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Old Norse religion. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:State atheism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:State atheism. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Galkayo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Galkayo. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Presenting Community Engagement Insights survey report: Tuesday, October 10, 1600 UTC

Don't forget. Meta wiki has full message. z'Hypn0toad (talk) 23:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

cats

Category:Wikipedians from the Great Plains Category:Wikipedians hoo kant spel 2 save there lyvz Category:Wikipedias who get a thrill from seeing a Quint respond Category:Wikipedias for renewable energy Category:Wikipedias who believe Elon Musk is this century's Genius Category:Wikipedians who retain on their userpages categories which have been deleted by consensusHypn0toad (talk) 01:16, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Historicity of Jesus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Historicity of Jesus. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia's Advertisement/begging

So you've probably see this section of Wikipedia's little begathon: Most people ignore my messages. But I hope you’ll think about how useful it is to have unlimited access to reliable, neutral information. Please help keep Wikipedia online and growing. Rather than beg for the moola, why not ask for people to join Wikipedia and help keep it reliable and neutral? Why not ask people to stop vandalising so our team of self-important vandal cops can actually do some content work? Why not preach the gospel of WP:NOT unto the masses so this encyclopedia isn't spammed into a business directory, Billboard/IMDB list, or a dating website?? L3X1 (distænt write) 15:31, 27 September 2017 (UTC)DNAU L3X1 (distænt write) 03:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

<sarcasm>I think that's a pretty close-minded view, L3X1. WMF is a struggling tech company trying to bring the world stuff like VisualEditor and the newest version of "Flow". Not only do the coders need pay but those coders need executive leadership who also need pay (requisite with their proven expertise) and those executives need nice furniture. Office space in San Francisco comes at a cost, too. I guess someone like you with no background in business doesn't understand that you don't need to ask for volunteers when they just show up. You NEVER ask fun-loving 10 year-olds not to do something because (reverse psychology) they absolutely will do that thing. It hurts us as a community when you, a lowly editor, question our betters at the home office. They need your unflinching support. They've been so nice in their appeals and the least we, as unpaid labor, can do is to trust them on the adult decision-making. But thanks, anyway, for making your feelings known on your own talk page versus venting on someone else's talk page.</sarcasm> Chris Troutman (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marlon Brando

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marlon Brando. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peter Hore

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Hore. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

CopyPatrol

Hi L3X1 and thank you very much for your help at Copypatrol. I think there's some improvements you could make to your work though. For example South African Polo Association you marked ad having no violation, though Earwig's Tool shows there's extremely close paraphrasing from two webpages (http://www.sapolo.co.za/about/history-of-polo-in-south-africa and http://www.sapolo.co.za/about/about-sa-polo). The article needs to be cleaned and revision deletion done on the article history. I think the best option for this particualr article is to list it at WP:CP so I am going to go ahead and do that.

Another example where you could have done better is Anzu Lawson, where you removed some suspected copyvio but did not request revision deletion. Revision deletion can be requested via adding the {{Copyvio-revdel}} template, or if you're unsure how to use the template you can post a request on my user talk page and I will look after it for you. Your note on the editor's talk page should have mentioned the possible copyvio, either via a personal note or using one of the available templates.

Bob Backlund is another one you marked as "no action needed" that could have been handled better. The content added in this diff was copied form the Wikipedia article Antonio Inoki. Copying within Wikipedia without providing the required attribution is a violation of the terms of our CC-by-SA license. For more information on copying within Wikipedia, please see WP:copying within Wikipedia. What you have to do for these cases is add the required attribution like I did here and notify the user how to do it themselves in the future like I did here using the template {{uw-copying}}.

We do appreciate your help but would also appreciate it very much if you could be more meticulous in the work. Please review the instructions at meta:CopyPatrol (and you might also consider reading Wikipedia:Copyright violations if you've not already done so). If there's any cases you're not sure about, think will be too time consuming, or you just don't feel up to tackling for any reason, please leave them for another patroller. I personally will ensure that all reports will get actioned within two days max, so there's no need for you to handle the trickier cases. Thanks again for your help. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Mea culpa, Diannaa, I will make sure to warn all violations and request rev-del. I also tracked down a copyvio request from June that was never actioned on here, if my memory doesn't fail me. Thanks for telling me about these issues and running Copy-Patrol. L3X1 (distænt write) 00:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Karl Marx

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Karl Marx. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Presenting Community Engagement Insights survey report: Tuesday, October 10, 1600 UTC

Don't forget. Meta wiki has full message. z'Hypn0toad (talk) 23:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

herm yeah. TLDR for the charts: Editors contribute, test, and use Wikimedia products. Who'd of thunk it. We don't go to international anything and aren't on speaking terms with the WMF. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mausoleum of Abu Huraira

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mausoleum of Abu Huraira. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sven Hassel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sven Hassel. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Meister und Margarita

sorry, can i have the 3 articles in MY sandbox? thanks! --Donna Gedenk (talk) 22:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Donna Gedenk Sure, want me to move them? L3X1 (distænt write) 22:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

thank you very much!!--Donna Gedenk (talk) 07:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Done L3X1 (distænt write) 23:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Birth date and age

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Birth date and age. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jadwiga of Poland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jadwiga of Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Marriage

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Marriage. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello L3X1, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Roman Polanski

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Roman Polanski. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julie Payette

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julie Payette. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gillian Keegan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gillian Keegan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gary the Goat

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gary the Goat. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elie Wiesel

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elie Wiesel. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stephen Paddock

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Paddock. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Dakota people

Hi L3X1, you might be interested in this edit. Cheers.--Jeanambr (talk) 09:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

C. W. Gilmore sandbox review?

Why did you review my Sandbox Page?

I stated in [3] that I used my sandbox to store information for my appear of the ban ruling which was: "You are not to edit Patriot Prayer or its talk page. Drmies (talk) 01:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)" I stated that I was not editing said article in my sandbox, but merely gathering up information to use for my appeal. I don't understand the interest in my sandbox as this the 5th time some Administrator or editor has in some way been interested:

How is this not a violation of your topic ban? You cannot be writing about Patriot Prayer at all, that's what a topic ban means. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

== Your are violating your topic ban ==

This:"I don't even mention the article from which I am banned, that is too close to talking about it, but you are helping out there to keep the excesses of one POV pushing on that article" is a violation. Using Thanks for people who are editing the way you want them to is also a violation. The next step will be either a block or a site ban, but you can easily avoid that by not trying to test the boundaries. Up to you. Doug Weller talk 20:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

C. W. Gilmore, please see this. The worst thing someone under a topic ban can do is seek out the limits of the topic ban. It is not a fruitful pursuit. Also, please don't use the term "harass" lightly. If there's actual harassment, make a case and report it, but don't thrown the term around like it's meaningless. Drmies (talk) 15:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Blocked – 48 hours. Technically this is four reverts, even though the material varies. Gilmore has two previous edit warring blocks and a recent topic ban. Gilmore should not be editing about Patriot Prayer anywhere on Wikipedia, even in their own sandbox, and risks a sanction if they continue. EdJohnston (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

All this because I SAVED some conversations from the banned article's talkpage, that I planned to reference for my appeal??? I have not and will not violate the unjust ban, but I do plan on appealing it and that takes information from the said page(s). I had to answer each of these allegations time and again and each time, no violation was found, but I've feeling a bit harassed and none of this is helping my appeal since it seems that Administrators tend to glance over items and not read in depth, so each false accusation makes me look the worse. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello C. W. Gilmore, I have no interest in your sandbox, and don't even remember what was in it. The only reason I saw it was because I was patrolling in WP:NPP using Special:NewPagesFeed with the criteria chanegd to show pages in the userspace. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 00:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

My apologies, as my sandbox has been at the centre of Darkness Shines latest jabs, as that some Administrators seem to take at face value without looking into the issues, lately. Thanks C. W. Gilmore (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of pioneers in computer science

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of pioneers in computer science. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Request your guidance

Hello. I would like your input on a couple of things regarding the deletion of SharkLinux article. I reached out to the closer and in discussion things he/she has told me seems to condradict the policies as I read them. Also would like to ask a couple questions regarding the notability issue and how this was still not acheived after the additional sources I was able to put forward. In any sense Id appreciate a msg (privacy prefered) or at least a response here. Marpet98 (talk) 06:31, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Yes, sorry I forgot to address this. I will try to get back to you tomorrow/Monday. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 02:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Marpet98 The draft currently has 7 sources, after the 2 duplicates it has 5. While Wiki.ubuntu and the FaceBook post verify information, they don't provide an indication of notability. (Being jumped to the front of the line for an advanced vetting does seem to be a pretty major achievement, though). 3 sources is cutting it pretty close for notability in most editors' eyes. Another 3 or 4 different news articles would probably suffice. Hope this helps, sorry for the late reply. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

L3X1 I appreciate your response. I think I misunderstood how the discussion process worked. My objective during this time was trying to show that SharkLinux met notability critera. The sources I was referring to were the extra sources I provided in the discussion. In my readings on notability policy It was my (mis)understanding that the existence of references and coverage worked towards notability and that they didnt specifically need to be sourced in the article. In the discussion, to establish notability and - being the basis of the nomination - avoid a delete, I provided a long list of references and scanned pages of a couple magazine articles that I couldnt find online. I was more puzzled that these were seemingly overlooked and I had failed to establish notability. You indicate the sources "as is" are dangerously borderline but a few more sources would have made the difference, am I correct? If so, my understanding of notability policy hindered my efforts as I specifically neglected to add more sources thinking providing the references in discussion was sufficient. These extra references were never sourced in the article because, while they establish notability, they were not used directly as a source for material written in the article. Im not sure of the proper handling of material that adds to notability but doesnt contribute directly to the written content of the article. For example; If I was pictured on the cover of The Rolling Stones - this certainly qualifies as notable but unless a reference is made to the RS cover appearance it wouldnt be listed in the article sources. Any advice you can offer or is there still something I seem to be "not getting" ? Again, I appreciate your time and pointing me in the right direction. Marpet98 (talk) 05:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

I don't want to leave you hanging, it will be tomorrow when I respond. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Yes, Marpet98 additional sources will help prove the case. In my own writings I have struggled to incorporate extra sources and always found it to be a challenge as well. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

@Marpet98: If the citations corroborate facts that are already stated in the article, you could add them as further citations for the same statements. If they merely establish notability, you could simply add them at the end of the first sentence in Draft:SharkLinux. – Fayenatic London 08:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC) ((talk page stalker))

You have both been very helpful and I want to thank you for your guidance. I know neither of you have any obligation to take the time to provide me assistance, please know I appreciate this tremendously. I have been tied up between work and acting as a 'housewife' to two girls 3ys/1yr now that my wife has returned to work from maternity leave. I will be making time to make inclusions/improvements to the article and will let you know when Ive made progress worth mentioning. I look forward to you seeing the improved version. Again, thank you. Marpet98 (talk) 11:59, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Woody Allen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Woody Allen. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Abram Petrovich Gannibal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Abram Petrovich Gannibal. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Steve Bannon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Steve Bannon. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Bucktony's socks

Both of them are creating some mess here, as one sock is reverting another sock. Just sending you a message so don't be surprised if your edits get reverted by me... You were reverting a sock, who actually was reverting another sock, well... -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 18:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Ah! Now it makes sense. Thanks for explaining and takign care of it :). L3X1 (distænt write) 19:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Happy Stuff

(Can't rem tags, but this is a quick hello and thank you again for starting this as per request - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_E._Valett - He was born and passed in November. Also! Happy Holidays ahead & Merry Wiki (save your current break.) Peace - RN)

Hello again, and you are welcome! Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write) 00:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rihanna

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rihanna. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Public Soy-viss Announcment

I will be extremely AFK November 5-ish through the 8th, so if you're going to indef me, delete all my edits, and vandalise my talk page you should totally do it then, because internet doesn't exist the world around and because those actions AREN"T publicly logged so there is absolutely no way I would ever be able to find out, and eternally haunt, whoever did that. Not advising one way or the other, but, take your pick. If I miss your RfA, AfD, or RfC, please don't be offended. It's your own fault you filed those without me. ^[FBDB]

I also don't do Halloween for religious reasons, so these next few days might be a little weird. Just know that I know you guys like me (I hope :) and the feeling is mutual. This is starting to sound like a retirement spiel, so Lord High … L3X1 (addressed as His Worshipfulness Lordy Lord) 01:22, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Seems legit L3X1 (distænt write) 01:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

moved2bottom the Hypn0toad 02:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

ha ha editing a mile up! the Hypn0toad 22:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Recent years

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Recent years. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Richard Blumenthal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard Blumenthal. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carter Page

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carter Page. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marlon Brando

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marlon Brando. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Done

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Done

Please comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Draft talk:Brian Clifton (composer)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Draft talk:Brian Clifton (composer). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

DoneL3X1 (distænt write) 04:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Benito Mussolini. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Danica Roem

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Danica Roem. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations from WP:STiki!

The Bronze STiki Barnstar of Merit

Congratulations, L3X1! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 5,000 classification threshold using STiki.

We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool.

We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! L3X1 (distænt write) 15:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Patriot Prayer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Patriot Prayer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Done 2 dramahs in 10 hours.

Please comment on Talk:Emily Beecham

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emily Beecham. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Foreign involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catalan Republic (2017)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catalan Republic (2017). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes

Please note that I reverted your acceptance of this edit as the only content change was the addition of unsourced personal info to the infobox.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Aydin Aghdashloo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aydin Aghdashloo. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Randy Quaid

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Randy Quaid. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sergio Verdú

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sergio Verdú. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Al Franken

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Al Franken. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sambasiva Rao Nanduri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sambasiva Rao Nanduri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – Train2104 (t • c) 02:06, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

What? Train2104 I didn't make that I moved it. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Somehow you're the first author in the page history, so TW sent it your way... – Train2104 (t • c) 14:16, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tesla Semi. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Please make your accusations of disrupting Wikipedia at WP:ANI, or do not post them.

Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:39, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

No point in going to ANI except to ask for sanctions. I have no desire to sanction you, as you do good work, and also one (I'll forget the first one, which was when you added the GNG tag to the article) case is not enough to receive sanctions. L3X1 (distænt write) 17:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

And you don't get to hide your deeds behind the cry of AGF! when I and others have discussed and warned you about them. If you believe I am ABFing by considering your nominations to be POINTy, then take me to ANI. L3X1 (distænt write) 18:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

I have no idea what kind of accusation you're making about Good Articles. All I can suggest is you try to learn how the review process for GA works. Please stop making baseless accusations. I will definitely be requesting action to stop this behavior if you keep it up. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

I never mentioned GAs.L3X1 (distænt write) 18:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Oh, GNG, not GA. My mistake. It still doesn't make any sense, but whatever. If you think an AfD is a vote, and you've got more than enough votes to win, then you should feel confident you will get what you want. Stop worrying. Adding a personal dispute on top of that doesn't help you. You've already got SPAs and dubious IP editors creeping around. Getting sandbagged with shenanigans is likely to to pull defeat from the jaws of victory. Quit while you're ahead. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blake Shelton

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blake Shelton. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alex Jones (radio host)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alex Jones (radio host). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tim McGraw

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tim McGraw. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

[1] ttps://www.dyfed-powys.police.uk/en/about-us/who-we-are/whos-who/

[1]