Talk:Qaboos bin Said

Personal Life

I would like to highlight that prior RFCs consensus in Talk:Qaboos bin Said/Archive 2 and Talk:Qaboos bin Said/Archive 3 concluded that this material should not be included. While some editors believe it’s solely a matter of BLP and BDP, it’s actually a broader issue related to rumor-based and weakly sourced allegations. Here are the points justifying the removal of these allegations:

1. Weak and Speculative Sources: The sources used to support these allegations lack credibility and rely heavily on speculation. Many are primarily rumor-based or from less authoritative outlets. According to Wikipedia’s policies, particularly Wikipedia:Reliable sources, sources must be reliable and independent, especially for contentious claims. Sourced rumors—without substantive evidence—remain unsubstantiated and detract from the quality of the article.
   • Source [53] is based on assumptions.
   • Source [54] is based on the claims of only three individuals, one of whom was arrested in 1994, raising credibility concerns.
   • Source [55] is based on beliefs, lacking concrete evidence.
   • Source [56] cites a quote allegedly found in the “Graham Diaries,” but the published Oxford University Press edition contains no such quote, suggesting that Tony Molesworth may not have mentioned anything about Qaboos's private life. (unless someone can verify)
2. Lack of Relevance to the Subject’s Legacy: These allegations don’t seem to add substantial value or relevance to the overall article. Readers are unlikely to gain meaningful insight from unproven claims that lack significance to the individual’s contributions or public image. Wikipedia’s policies, particularly Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight, emphasize giving appropriate weight to content. Removing material that lacks substantive relevance could improve the article’s quality and focus.
3. Cultural Context and Sensitivity: Given that this individual is from an Arab country, where LGBT-related topics are often highly sensitive and may be legally restricted, it’s important to consider the cultural implications. Wikipedia policies allow for the coverage of controversial topics, but content should have a clear encyclopedic purpose rather than presenting information that could be perceived as culturally inflammatory or out of context.

It is surprising that some editors still support the inclusion of this material despite RFC consensus and previous discussions recommending its exclusion. I hope these points offer clarity on why it may be beneficial to review the consensus to ensure the article aligns with Wikipedia’s standards on reliable sourcing, relevance, and sensitivity. Itshrabkhan (talk) 08:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Masjid

I would like to point out that the mosque(Masjid) which Sultan Qaboos built is not the biggest mosque in the world at all as stated, in fact, there are many other masjids around the world which are by far bigger than this masjid. For example, Al Masjid Al Haram in Makkah (Saudi Arabia) is bigger by probably over 100 times! The total capacity of Al Jami'a Al Akbar (Muscat) is 20,000 worshipers, whereas, in Makkah it can take more than 2.5 million worshipers. I do not know how this false information appeared in this website ?? Regards.

Revision

I added two new subheadings about Qaboos' early life and the coup. I would like to create a more detailed account of Qaboos' reign - in particular the Dhofar conflict and modernization. I would also like a section on his personal life. I need help with this please. -Anon

why don't you write about his hobbies and interests? I hope you find this website helpful http://www.omannews.com/english/H.M%20%20E.htm