User talk:Bloomdoom2

Bloomdoom2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bloomdoom2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Free 6LACK. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you still want to remove it, please discuss and obtain consensus on the talk page. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: From what I've seen, an editor named JustDoItFettyg added the credits in a separate section below the track listing, so I don't understand why the warning still has to be there. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 04:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Using multiple accounts

Hello, Bloomdoom2, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as JayPe (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. If you have been blocked for something, socking is usually not a good way to get around it. Sometimes, it helps to admit that you are wrong and try to fix your mistakes. Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: I have no idea what your talking about, but I am not the user you mentioned, you could check me if you want. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 04:48, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Unnecessary linking phrases

You made this edit in the Under Pressure (album) article and other hip hop articles, it unnecessary to link common phrase as "rapper" and "recording artist" because it doesn't really need to be linked because a majority of readers would already understand this basic concept, and we try to avoid those sorts of links to avoid "overload" for the reader. Don't follow edits made by some disruptive IPs. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Okay thanks, I wasn't aware of that issue. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 02:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

You might see some articles who had the phrases unnecessary linked by this IP, who had a history of disruptive editing as linking pointless phrases and changing bits of text when the article doesn't really needs it, it's just bad grammar. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Ok thanks for the heads up. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 03:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your welcome. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bloomdoom2. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

@Exemplo347: I don't have any relationship with anybody I edit about on this site. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 01:53, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Birds in the Trap Sing McKnight

You made this edit to the article, you linked the rapper Nav but the problem is, it's just a redirect to a article with very little information of him, it's just his name on it that's pretty much it, that's kinda misleading to readers who want get more info of this rapper. If you're planning to create a article about him, I suggest to created the article first then linking his name back to the article, because for now it's just a pointless redirect. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Ok, I'll look into it, thanks. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Big Sean discography

You made this edit to Big Sean discography here, Can you explain to me why did you remove his guest appearances? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: Oh damn I didn't even know that, I was falling asleep as I made that edit, thanks for catching that, it was a mistake and I was only trying to update the "No Favors" song charting, thanks and that won't happen again. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not use Twitter as a source for chart peaks. Twitter is dubious at the best of times, is not encouraged as a source and the Chart Data account is not considered a reliable source of information. Twitter may only be used as a primary source when artists speak about themselves or when an identifiable, verified expert in their field posts something. Even then, an independent third-party news source is preferred. Ss112 07:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

@Ss112: Ok I won't next time, thanks for letting me know. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 01:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Bounce Back

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bounce Back (Big Sean song), without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: That edit is not unsourced, Hitmaka, aka Yung Berg produced the song, and producers get composer credit, so its not wrong, plus his composer credit is listed on the I Decided article and on Big Sean's website which the credits were adapted from thats on the same article. I'm pretty sure you made a mistake on this, so I'm re-adding his credit since I've shown you where the credit is from, thank you. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 01:51, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

There is no source in the article to support this. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: Did you even take a look at what I linked in my response? Its right there. "Credits adapted from Big Sean's official website", you can even Google it if your unsure, I feel that you didn't even bother to do some research yourself. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 02:51, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Where is the link to the source in the article? Magnolia677 (talk) 02:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: It's right here, you can also see the source in the track listing section. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: Right, thank you TheAmazingPeanuts, in my initial reply, I said "Big Sean's website which the credits were adapted from thats on the same article." which the hyperlink was to show you that it the source was there, not sure why you didn't notice that, plus I literally said it to you. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 03:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Please pay careful attention. If you look to the top of this discussion, I cautioned you because you added unsourced content to Bounce Back (Big Sean song). I have looked for the source you mentioned to support your edits to Bounce Back (Big Sean song) and it is not included in the article. This makes your edit unsourced. As an experienced editor, please take my caution to heart when I say, do not add your unsourced edit back without a source attached. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

And now you have added it back, unsourced. I would at this point urge you to either find a source to support you edit, or to revert your edit. If you don't I will report you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: Your giving me options and threatening me? I'm not obligated to listen to you because of a mistake you made. TheAmazingPeanuts and I already gave you the source, and at first you didn't happen to notice it, but now you noticed it so it supposed to be fine. I don't know what else you want since the information is and always been correct, as well as it's album track listing, the credits on there are correct too. Secondly, being an experienced editor doesn't mean you don't make mistakes, I believe that you have made a mistake on this one because I provided you the source, and like I mentioned before the first time for some reason you failed to identify the credits where I directly linked you too. To add to that, his credit was never unsourced because his credit was already there when the article was made until an IP editor came in and removed his credit thinking that TM88 made the beat, which TM88 did not. Nobody noticed the error until now, and since you came in, theres been nothing but issues, which I haven't had before on Wikipedia with my earlier edits. I want an apology please. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

"Since you came in, theres been nothing but issues, which I haven't had before on Wikipedia with my earlier edits". Clearly you are not getting it. You've made just 384 edits, and already your talk page is filled with warnings from other editors. I urge you to take a moment to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policy, and learn how to edit appropriately. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: So you ignore where I proved your mistake and straight up attack me on my last comment. If you even bothered to read them, they aren't warnings, just minor errors that I made, nothing that shows the "unsourced content" excuse I've seen that you have done on thousands of hip hop related articles, I am pretty familiar now with Wikipedia, just learning new things on here as I go along, and I edit appropriately, since I had no major issue over a credit until now. Again, I want an apology please. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 03:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Smash David

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Smash David. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your addition here of Lee on the Beats as a producer was not supported by the source cited. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: I've left you a response in the edit summary, and this warning you added makes it look like I add "unsourced content" normally. I am still waiting for your response and apology on our previous incident. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 23:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

As well, this edit to Metro Boomin production discography was unsourced. I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Notability and begin adding inline citations to all your edits. Do not add sources in edit summaries. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: That edit cannot be condoned as "unsourced", there was no unsourced content added or removed, just hyperlinked to their respective articles. You should learn to trust other editors, or at least do some your own research other than to fully rely on the source, which I notice you do. I'm here to do serious editing, not just mess around or vandalize like an IP user. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

You should learn to trust other editors, or at least do some your own research other than to fully rely on the source This isn't how stuff works here though. While we trust editors, an inline citation is always necessary to comply with WP:V - and in fact, that is how we build up trust. Any information added, needs to have a source and this is not optional. Remember that our goal here is verifiability, not truth. If you are adding any credits/chat info and you do not have the citation with you, wait until you can find a citation. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 00:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

SPI

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xboxmanwar. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: Why are you doing this, just because your experience with past editors doesn't mean I'm them. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 04:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Free 6LACK. This edit added a bunch of unsourced information. WP:V is a policy and we require reliable secondary sources. Please do not restore it. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cozy Tapes Vol. 1: Friends. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:37, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

You clearly have a problem understanding what WP:CONSENSUS is. You need consensus to remove the template and you need to demonstrate consensus. And the correct way is to start a talk page discussion. I do not see any consensus at this moment, so I am going to ask you to self revert this edit. If you want to debate, use the talk page, not edit summaries to do it. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: Please refrain from threatening to me to be blocked from Wikipedia by making personal attacks, its unconstitutional, plus you are not an administrator. I added those sources and they were correct as I can see them myself, I know what consensus is, and you clearly wrote that and was not part of a template, so I beg to differ, when I added the reliable source, you said it was unreliable, so I don't know who you are to judge, I got my credits from that source, and I know that Tidal is a reliable source. Same with FREE 6LACK, except some of the producers aren't listed in the source, but again I said that its obvious as to see who produced who from the composer credits with a simple Google search and a Wikipedia search, which is then hyperlinked.

I also see that you edit a lot Singapore related articles (since you are from Singapore), but not much experience in music articles, maybe you should take some time to do some more search about finding credits, no offense. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 10:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

I am going to ask you a simple question to see if you understand the importance of WP:V. Do you think this edit of yours complies with the spirit of WP:V? (I am not threatening you btw, I am simply warning you of what will happen if you continue, based on past experience with editors in this field). --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: Yes, because I gave the reliable source, and you can link the credits by their birth name, which Joshua Luellen is the birth name of well known American record producer Southside, it could not be anymore obvious than that, unless you don't understand how that works, I can explain more later. Also taking a look at other album articles on Wikipedia showing the same birth name of the same producer with their stage name following that, I believe to safe to say that they are the same person (for example). Also, by telling me that you will make sure I will get blocked is an obvious threat to get me blocked. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 11:07, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

On Wikipedia, the WP:BURDEN of adding sources and ensuring that WP:V is satisfied, rests on the editor adding information. According to WP:V, The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article.. In this edit, do you feel that the source you added also verified all the information you added? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:14, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: Yes, because producers automatically get composer credit, so they can get royalties on the song they produced, and the hyperlinking of producers from their birth name to their stage name isn't a hard thing to do. Also to note that songwriters (obviously) and composers of samples (if any were used) also get composer credit for royalties from the song. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 11:19, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

So basically if A and B are producers while C and D are composers, what you are saying is that the source lists A,B,C,D all as composers. Am I correct? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:23, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

If you consider C and D as either a songwriter (a sole songwriter, not the one included with producing the song) or a composer of a certain sample used for a song, then yes you are correct. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 11:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Alright. Suppose A and B are producers while C and D are the songwriters. Now I see a source website and it mentions all 4 of them A,B,C,D as composers (and doesn't differentiate between them). How do I find out who are the songwriters and who are the producers? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

(Remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia "anyone can edit" and not "an expert should edit". This is the reason why we have our policies on WP:V and WP:BURDEN. We explicitly require a source so that even a non-expert can quickly check the facts). Btw, answering the question above might help you understand why many of us are particular about correctly citing sources. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: Sorry, I was busy all day yesterday and couldn't respond until now. Okay, suppose the song is Rules by 6LACK, it's obvious the 6LACK is Ricardo Valentine, so you can put him aside. A simple Wikipedia and Google search will show that Joshua Scruggs is Syk Sense, Ozan Yildirim is OZ (hence his name) and Trevor Slade is Singawd. A Google search for David Moreau-Hispard shows that he is part of Aqua Nebula Oscillator, a French experimental band, plus a WhoSampled listing shows that Hispard's song was sampled on Rules, thus giving him composer credit and royalties to the songs. Also, I never explicitly said that I was an "expert", I only said on my user page that I was good at finding credits, offering other editors help with finding credits. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 17:17, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

No problem. I have been busy as well. But now I understand your reasoning behind your edits. I will reply later today and explain more. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

I Decided

You made this edit in the article, but the problem is that this section is already in the "Bounce Back" article, so you clearly copied it and paste it in the I Decided article. We don't copied text from other articles in Wikipedia (WP:COPYWITHIN). And besides, that section had more to do with the track itself instead the album. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Alright then, thanks for letting me know. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 05:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome, if you have any more questions, let me know in my talk page in the future. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TheGoodPerry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Night. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Ty Dolla $ign

I was wondering if its correct to put his name with a "S" instead of a "$", its a bit confusing. From what ive seen in other articles for example : "The Buffet" or "Khalifa" his name is used in the stylized form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32zel (talk • contribs) 05:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

@32zel: The S is correct because it has to be a standard style with no special characters. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 05:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

@Bloomdoom2: Ok thanks for the feedback. 32zel (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2017 (MST)

@32zel: No problem, let me know if you need help on anything else. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 05:37, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kodak Black. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: My edits were not unsourced, show me that they "were", since you said so. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 00:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Please look at this dif. On the left you will see the unsourced content that was removed. The sources cited did not support the text you added, and which I removed. Please let me know if I am in error. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: I saw the "unsourced content", which wasn't unsourced, the XXL article in the source talks about Kodak's debut album "Painting Pictures", also to note that its pretty clear and obvious thats its the lead single, showing that the single was released through a major label, and not through mixtapes (although some of his commercial singles came from mixtapes). The chart info are located on the single's and Kodak's discography articles themselves, so there's no need to reiterate that info again with too much sources on Kodak's main article. The record deal info is based on logic, which most of Kodak's commercially released music (excluding Going Viral and There He Go) are through those three labels. I want to ask you to not speculate info thats already been added and sourced in other articles and perhaps do some basic research yourself, and not solely rely on the sources given to you since there are many more sources out there. Thanks again. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

All-Amerikkkan Bada$$

If you want this article to be moved to All-Amerikkkan Badass, requested at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests to have the article moved. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: I did, thanks. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 01:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

I see Magnolia677 has reported you to Ad Orientem and Laser brain for your edits, if you're really not this editor, I suggest to give them very good evidence to prove that you're are not the same editor that Magnolia677 accusing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Ok, thanks for the heads up, I see that he is accusing me of being "disruptive" and having aggressive behavior, which I don't those are the cases for me (although I was frustrated with him a bit earlier and got a little carried away), could I get your opinion on that and see if you can input other editors on it to see if I am really an "issue" Magnolia677 has described me as, and try to spare me, thanks. I've also informed Laser brain about his assumption that "its obvious" that I'm "Xboxmanwar", "JayPe" and any other editor that has a "similar" editing style like mine, and he has yet to reply. I see that my case hasn't had much activity and Magnolia677 wanted to move forward trying to "frame" me as those editors, I don't even know which editor I'm accused of now, perhaps all of them. Sigh. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 01:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Xboxmanwar and JayPe have a bad reputation of adding unsourced content in rap related articles and get in a editing war with Magnolia677 and other editors, including me. I know it's annoying to be reverted but sometimes it's necessary if you didn't add a source to that edit. Another editor have this problem with Magnolia677 before named JustDoItFettyg, who been blocked several times for adding unsourced content in rap related articles and since then he added sources to his edits now. My advice to you is, add reliable sources with your edits and don't get in a edit war with experience editors. I be happy to help you out with problems because you're seem very reasonable, unlike Xboxmanwar and JayPe, the editors I mentioned before don't seem to follow the guidelines. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Ok now it makes a lot more sense now, thanks again for the info, I'll try to add as much sources as I can, although I think Magnolia677 gets a little carried away by them even for the most minor details. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

By adding reliable sources and follow Wikipedia's guidelines I think you be fine. And your opinion about Magnolia677, yeah I agreed he get a little bit carried away with even the most minor edits, especially in articles that probably in his watch list, such as Kodak Black. Instead getting yourself in a edit war with Magnolia677 or any experience editor, I recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Ok, thanks again, I'll try to seek consensus next time, I just don't like waiting, but I guess that will have to do. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 05:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

I don't like waiting either, but this how it's works on Wikipedia. You can also talk to other editors as well, who had more experience than me. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Alright then, thanks again. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 06:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For being collaborative and providing quality info in hip hop articles . 32zel (talk) 03:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

@32zel: Thanks 32zel for this, I appreciate it a lot, I'll keep doing my best. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 03:48, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Non-free files

Do not upload higher resolution versions of non-free files. Our non-free content criteria require the use of low resolution images. Uploading a higher resolution constitutes a copyright violation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Painting Pictures

I don't mean to discredit your claims and what not, but here it shows only Atlantic as the distributor for the project, not Dollaz N Dealz/Sniper Gang. Therefore I believe that Atlantic should only be credited as distributor for the album. Thanks. LilNumerator (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@LilNumerator: Every project released by Kodak Black was on Dollaz N Dealz and Sniper Gang, Tunnel Vision was also released through Dollaz N Dealz and Sniper Gang (Sniper Gang seen on the cover), as shown here, so it would only make sense for the album to be released with those labels. I hope this helps. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 21:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Painting Pictures, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Painting Pictures

At Painting Pictures, you added names for the writers of each song. What was your source? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: Producers automatically get writing credits for songs they produced, this is literally shown and done in almost every single album of any artist, its general logic, otherwise they wouldn't get the royalties over the song. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: I have responded in that discussion. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 21:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kodak Black. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: Pardon me, but how oblivious can you be? The producer credits are literally on the respective single's cover, plus they were released independently before being included on his album, thats what a single is, its done with literally every album, I even added reliable sources, yet you still contradict them and other editors edits. I will re-add what you removed because it made no sense to remove them and they were perfectly fine, and these reverts of yours are starting to be unbearable, it would be nice for you to take into consideration about how credits, albums and singles work, otherwise I think you shouldn't edit on music related articles, thank you. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 22:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

---

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Instagram is not a RS, why re arrange the names? L3X1 (distant write) 21:44, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@L3X1: I have re-added the RIAA Gold certification because obviously you haven't checked the source and had instant doubt when you saw that the source was Instagram, literally Russ himself posted it on this account and its a verified profile, so its no excuse to remove it, thank you. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 22:26, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I asked about it on the RS noticeboard. L3X1 (distant write) 22:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

An admin has responded at the RS noticeboards. As they have much more experience in those matters than I do, I recluse myself from this situation. I removed a big chunk of the above warning per WP:DNTTR and it wasn't really relevant.Good day, L3X1 (distant write) 02:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kodak Black. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thanks for all your work on Kodak Black article and hip hop related. Kakashi123456789 (talk) 16:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Russ (rapper). Magnolia677 (talk) 11:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: What the hell! What unsourced content did I add to that page? I added a damn source with it, stop claiming false accusations. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 13:33, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Russ (rapper). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. This edit summary was unacceptable and a personal attack. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your revert of my edit

With this edit you reverted my previous edit to Drowning (A Boogie wit da Hoodie song), a new article you created. You left the edit summary "This edit is unacceptable, removing big amounts of info, and you didn't even look at the damn sources."

The unsourced information I removed included:

• Released: March 10, 2017
• Recorded: 2017
• Label: Highbridge and Atlantic Records
• Writers: Artist Dubose, Kodak Black (Dieuson Octave), Jahaan Sweet and Ray Nelson
• Producer: Sweet and Quasi
• Song title: Water
• Additional information: "This was the lead single of an upcoming debut studio album."

To support these edits, you cited the following:

• https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/my-s**t-single/id1128022784
• https://www.instagram.com/p/BRd17Nig3ht/
• https://www.instagram.com/p/BRd30kyABC5/
• http://www.billboard.com/artist/7460360/a-boogie-wit-da-hoodie/chart
• http://www.billboard.com/artist/7460360/A+Boogie+Wit+Da+Hoodie/chart?f=793
• http://www.billboard.com/artist/7460360/A+Boogie+Wit+Da+Hoodie/chart?f=379
• http://www.billboard.com/artist/7460360/A+Boogie+Wit+Da+Hoodie/chart?f=367

I was not able to support the edits listed above from the sources you cited. Could you please identify where in these sources they are supported? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:21, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

EarDrummers Entertainment

Please don't link EarDrummers Entertainment in the track listings because it doesn't have its own article or do these artists. It's just lead to a section of music producers with very little information. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Grateful (DJ Khaled album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Neither "Kodak Black" nor "Dieuson Octave" is listed as a writer. The source you cited here (which is a duplicate of the track listing linked to at the top of the section), states only "Ft. Kodak Black" on tracks 13 and 17. Please stop adding unsourced content. To avoid an edit war with you, I will also start a discussion on the article's talk page. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:53, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: I hope this is a fucking joke, or you're the most ignorant person ever in music. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ctrl (SZA album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Travis Scott discography. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: How is it unsourced? Bwoii 19:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Grateful (DJ Khaled album). Magnolia677 (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bloomdoom2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@Ronhjones:, Magnolia677 reported me yesterday, which was declined. Reporting me for the same thing when it was already declined is unfair, please unblock me. Thank you. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 21:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As below, you were reported for something else. Regardless, this doesn't address your block. You need to talk about your behaviour, when requesting an unblock. In this case, you would need to show that all of your additions are properly cited. Yamla (talk) 21:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Comment - I reported you yesterday for adding unsourced content to Ctrl (SZA album). I reported you today for adding unsourced content to Grateful (DJ Khaled album). Magnolia677 (talk) 21:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: I did not remove any unsourced content, in fact YOU removed sourced content, this was sourced. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 21:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bloomdoom2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@Yamla:, Magnolia677 removed the so-called "unsourced content" (which was sourced) from Grateful, then proceeded to give me a warning and then immediately report me after, which during that time, I made no edits to that same article and any article, so it is inappropriate to give me a block since I did not add any content back to the article, and I had no time to react to what Magnolia677 did. The warning says that I may be blocked the next time I add "unsourced content", which I did not add anything, yet Magnolia677 still reported me. Given the times before to which Magnolia677 reported me countless times, this editor CLEARLY wants me blocked. Also, to note, whenever this editor is questioned about their actions regarding "unsourced content" which isn't unsourced, they don't respond, see above where the warnings in this section are shown. Thank you. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you examine the source in the edit you are referecing, you will see that the information you added was indeed not cited there (the comment by Manny Dio was a repost of an original comment by Belly). It's clear from the fact that you are still making this argument that you do not understand how to use sources on Wikipedia, and this gives me sufficient cause for concern that I have upped the block to an indefinite one. To have the block lifted, you will need to demonstrate (not claim) that you comprehend the process for using sources on Wikipedia, in particular the process for determining whether a source is reliable or not. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui:, I am aware of how the sourcing criteria functions and I have made a lot of sourced edits, if you take a look thorugh my history, some other editors were defending me because of similar issues Magnolia677 has made a matter of, however you have just pointed out to me that I made a mistake, I saw the repost tag on Manny Dion's post, however I thought that the comment with it was written by Dion and not Belly, the original poster, and I thought that the image was the repost and not including the comment. I am sincerely sorry that this has happened, and next time I will make sure to look st sources more carefully. However, I still stand by my claim that Magolia677 gave me no time to react to the warning and went to reporting me after he gave me the warning, which said the next time I add "unsourced content" to that article, I may be blocked (which was Magnolia677's intention to make sure I was blocked), during that time I made no edits to any articles and specifically that article Magnolia677, yet I still was blocked, and since now I have an indefinite block, it's unfortunate it has to be this way. Also to note if anything Kodak Black related happens, Magnolia677 swoops in, which is why this is the point where we are now, otherwise they would not be involved. This has happened multiple times. Bloomdoom2 (talk) 16:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Look at Me! Original Cover - XXXTENTACION.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Look at Me! Original Cover - XXXTENTACION.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Snoop Dogg

Hi User:Bloomdoom2, Can you help? A lot of Snoop Dogg single covers are too small or wide (one example is for From tha Chuuuch to da Palace, but one of many). Also: can you get covers for Life of da Party, Murder Was the Case (song) (remix), New York, New York (Tha Dogg Pound song), 2 of Amerikaz Most Wanted, Wrong Idea, Mission Cleopatra (song), Wiggle (song) and To the Max (song) please? Appreciate if you can.--Theo Mandela (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PRBLMS Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PRBLMS Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MyMomentTeeGrizzley.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MyMomentTeeGrizzley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

File:LookAtMeRereleaseCover.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LookAtMeRereleaseCover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Look at Me! Original Cover - XXXTENTACION.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Look at Me! Original Cover - XXXTENTACION.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:54, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Look at Me! - XXXTENTACION.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Look at Me! - XXXTENTACION.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:55, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Never Story

Hi, I'm AngusWOOF. Bloomdoom2, thanks for creating The Never Story!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This album may not be Wikipedia notable. It needs to meet WP:NMUSIC and I don't see any record charting on Billboard.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ugly God for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ugly God is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugly God (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 18:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

A goat for you!

here's a goat cuz you helped out with making the page for the goat XXXTENTACION

Verysadeyes (talk) 20:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:It Takes Two by Mike Will Made It.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:It Takes Two by Mike Will Made It.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 9 August 2019 (UTC)