User talk:JB Hoang Tam

Welcome!

Hi JB Hoang Tam! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 13:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aster Amoyo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aster Amoyo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 13:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aster Amoyo (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aster Amoyo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aster Amoyo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 19:59, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JB Hoang Tam! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! BuySomeApples (talk) 19:59, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1902 Nobel Prize in Literature

Hi, could you have a new look at 1902 Nobel Prize in Literature that you created. It looks like you've mixed in some info from the 1901 price. Greetings, Tomas e (talk) 21:27, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1948 Nobel Prize page

1. The link in the infobox is to a .jpg of a few past laureates. I'm not sure where you intended it to lead, so I didn't fix it.

2. You reversed my changes of Thomas Stearns Eliot to T. S. Eliot on the grounds that nobelprize.org uses his full name. The list of nominees reads "Thomas Eliot". There are several other differences between the official list and the Wikipedia one (e.g. Halldor Laxness, Winston Churchill, Colette, Dorothy Fisher). Is there a policy that lists like this should be as close as possible to the original? Hope this is useful to you. CohenTheBohemian (talk) 13:41, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1956 Nobel Prize in Literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harald Beyer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam

Thank you for creating 1905 Nobel Prize in Literature.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello JB Hoang Tam! Your additions to 1972 Nobel Prize in Literature have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam

Thank you for creating 2012 Nobel Prize in Literature.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam

Thank you for creating 1997 Nobel Prize in Literature.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:32, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam

Thank you for creating 1995 Nobel Prize in Literature.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Borongan. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Your edit to 1994 Nobel Prize in Literature has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam

Thank you for creating 2000 Nobel Prize in Literature.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:16, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aster Amoyo has been accepted

Aster Amoyo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam

Thank you for creating 1950 Nobel Prize in Literature.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam

Thank you for creating 1913 Nobel Prize in Literature.

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article. I have reviewed it. I am not sure if this paragraph is copied, but it comes up that way in two sources. "On 25 March 2004, Tagore's Nobel Prize was stolen from the safety vault of the Visva-Bharati University, along with several other of his belongings. On 7 December 2004, the Swedish Academy decided to present two replicas of Tagore's Nobel Prize, one made of gold and the other made of bronze, to the Visva-Bharati University. It inspired the fictional film Nobel Chor. In 2016 a baul singer named Pradip Bauri, accused of sheltering the thieves, was arrested and the prize was returned." Perhaps you can write this in your own words?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 14:06, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tip

Hi Hoang, and welcome to en.WP. If you write and save something on your user page (overleaf from this one), your username won't flash out in red every time you make an edit: it will be the normal blue. Tony (talk) 10:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Yasunari Kawabata into 1968 Nobel Prize in Literature. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Your edit to 2020 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of people declared Servants of God under Pope Francis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the page after discovering that it has not included the latest individuals declared or recognized as "Servants of God" by the Church from other countries. The page needs constant updating which I was doing with reliable references from international news agencies. Unfortunately, you have reverted the page. If you find my updating unhelpful, then please do find ways to update the page. Thank you. JB Hoang Tam (talk) 07:56, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

faithweb.com is not a reliable source and not suitable for citing facts on Wikipedia. We've mentioned this time and again, and yet there seem to remain hundreds of unreliable references in the article you're adding to. Please find actual, reliable sources or you will not be able to add these updates. Elizium23 (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gemma Silvero moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gemma Silvero, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Right now, the only significant sources are either primary or unreliable (YouTube). You need in-depth coverage from several (at least 3) reliable independent sources to show notability.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:12, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible nominees

Thanks for your creation of individual articles for each Nobel category awarded in each year. I'm however doubtful that we should include any list of nominees or candidates in these articles – they are, as you know, entirely unofficial at present. The problem is that there is no well-defined criteria to determine who to include, and any such list (regardless of citations) is simply inappropriate speculation and original research. Without official confirmation from the Nobel Foundation, there is no good reason why a seemingly arbitrary list of prominent scientists who weren't awarded the prize should be worth mentioning at all. The best thing to do in this case is to delete such speculative sections and add a proper list of nominees 50 years later. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 14:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gemma Silvero (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QueerEcofeminist were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide more information on why they are notable with sources that are reliable and independent of the subject. thanks

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gemma Silvero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QueerEcofeminist🌈 18:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Annie Ernaux. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 21:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reminder but which part have I made unreferenced or poorly referenced contribution regarding Annie Ernaux? I have not a been among the recent editors of that Wikipedia article. JB Hoang Tam (talk) 12:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Burmese Nobel laureates and nominees for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Burmese Nobel laureates and nominees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Burmese Nobel laureates and nominees until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

gidonb (talk) 14:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Nobel Prize in Literature into 2018 Nobel Prize in Literature. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your edit to 2018 Nobel Prize in Literature has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel laureate

Hello friend, why did you revert? The country of citizenship was the Soviet Union. Please consistent answer, not geopolitical and ideological rants, thanks. -- Blackcat 12:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend, if you suggest to use Soviet Union instead of Russia, then better apply it to all existing articles related to the Nobel Prize in Literature (from 1901 to 1991 Nobel Prize in Literature) for the articles' uniformity. Thank you! JB Hoang Tam (talk) 12:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's you who made the original error, it's not my fault. I corrected the error. It's up to you to correct the other errors, not to rewrite a wrong data to uniform the other wrong pages.... -- Blackcat 12:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam. Thank you for your work on 1928 Nobel Prize in Literature. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to 2020 Nobel Peace Prize. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Additionally you removed a named reference that is used elsewhere. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:09, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam. Thank you for your work on 1945 Nobel Prize in Literature. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! I hope you will write more articles. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Homero Aridjis

Hello JB Hoang Tam; i hope you are doing well. This is the second time you manually reverted the image i added in the article of Homero Aridjis, without providing a reason (diff1, diff2). Did you read my last edit summary? Demetrios1993 (talk) 08:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lualhati Bautista.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lualhati Bautista.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks for creating this page List of South African Nobel laureates and nominees! Ppt91 ^talk 23:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gemma Silvero

Hello, JB Hoang Tam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gemma Silvero, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brazilian Nobel laureates and nominees, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hypophysis and Encephalography.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:La vie scélérate1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:La vie scélérate1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace map for List of Nobel laureates in Literature

Thank you for your contributions to List of Nobel laureates in Literature. I've identified several problems with it that have been listed on its Talk page. Please respond at Talk:List of Nobel laureates in Literature#Map. Irregulargalaxies (talk) 17:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Children of Segu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Children of Segu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.publishersweekly.com/9780670829811. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has not been deleted but the synopsis was copied/closely paraphrased and has been removed as a copyright violation. -- Whpq (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Whpq (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been previously warned about this. You must contribute content written in your won words. Do not paste in text from copyrighted sources. -- Whpq (talk) 13:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gemma Silvero

Hello, JB Hoang Tam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gemma Silvero".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Clarivate Citation laureates in Economic Sciences moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Clarivate Citation laureates in Economic Sciences, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of female Clarivate Citation laureates moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of female Clarivate Citation laureates, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoang. Do you intend to still write the Nobel Prize in Literature pages for 1921 through 1926, 1932 through 1934, and 1958 through 1960?

Those years are missing. I'm interested in the lists of authors who died in those years without being nominated for the prize, as well as the winners and those who were nominated. 45kerdall (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will continue creating the Nobel Prize in Literature pages for the missing years. JB Hoang Tam (talk) 11:04, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 45kerdall (talk) 23:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clarivate Citation Laureates

Why did you not create List of Clarivate Citation laureates in Economics? ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:53, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There has been one but currently transferred into draft. JB Hoang Tam (talk) 20:10, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Clarivate Citation laureates in Economic Sciences

Hello, JB Hoang Tam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Clarivate Citation laureates in Economic Sciences, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam. Thank you for your work on List of Clarivate Citation laureates in Economic Sciences. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:50, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of potential copyvio in 1931 literature Nobel article

Copyright problem: 1931 Nobel Prize in Literature

Hello JB Hoang Tam! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 1931 Nobel Prize in Literature, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1931/karlfeldt/facts/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:1931 Nobel Prize in Literature and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, 1931 Nobel Prize in Literature, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:1931 Nobel Prize in Literature. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:1931 Nobel Prize in Literature with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:1931 Nobel Prize in Literature saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Tomobe03 (talk) 11:10, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of nominees for the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newbury.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Hi, JB Hoang Tam, Good work! on IndiraDevi Dhanrajgir article. Thank you for your contribution. Cheers! Dcotos (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JB Hoang Tam. Thank you for your work on Indira Devi Dhanrajgir. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Articles tone must be neutral, presenting unbiased information on all included perspectives. so please do not use this tone (wealthy, public figure, opportunity of meeting affluent people, Palace), you may clean all resume like information from biography section. Thank you

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 15:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Featured list removal nomination

I have nominated List of Indian Nobel laureates for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Broc (talk) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]