User talk:Blackcat

Hello Blackcat it, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Alison ^❤ 19:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

(Just had to do the "Welcome" thing above :) Yes, I saw on your itwiki page that everything is good now. Let me know if there's anything you need from here and welcome to the enwiki side of things! Ciao :) - Alison ^❤ 19:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:U.S. female rugby union footballers

Category:U.S. female rugby union footballers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and thanks

Hi, good catch on that sneaky vandalism on S.L. Benfica, thanks for pointing that out! That one was tricky to find in the history because there were a lot of edits, but usually you can look in the article history and find the vandal edit and revert it yourself (it's usually one of the most recent edits). Just save the most recent clean version. Don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or need anything, I'm always glad to help. Peace, delldot ∇. 21:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cold Fusion

Hi Blackcat, you wrote this on JzG's page:

Hi JzG, sorry to bother you again, but it seems we have a little problem on it.wiki. BTW of the blacklisted site, there's an user that states there's also useful material, freely released by scientists who wrote about Cold Fusion, and asked for those documents to be whitelisted. Now the question is: have en.wiki either blacklisted the whole site or left some deeplinks to some given documents in white list (In other words: what do we lose in terms of knowledge if we blacklist that site)? Thanks again for your attention. Sergio † BC™ (Write me!) 18:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that JzG is a Wikipedia administrator. Are you bringing something to his attention with regard to the Italian Cold Fusion page? What is the problem? And what is the blacklisted page you are referring to? StevenBKrivit (talk) 04:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New username

I have renamed you, as requested. Sorry it took me so long to get around to it! --Deskana, Champion of the Frozen Wastes

replied

Hey, replied to your note on my talk page. Peace, delldot ∇. 22:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, another reply. Peace, delldot ∇. 23:37, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Blackcat! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Serafino Ghizzoni - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea

Hey, sorry for the wait, I took a look and made suggestions on my talk page. Peace, delldot ∇. 23:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Theirrulez

We appreciate your contributions to User talk:Theirrulez, but since this is the English Wikipedia, you should communicate only in English. See Wikipedia:Talk#Good_practices for more information. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 00:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marzio Innocenti

Hello, Blackcat. You have new messages at McMarcoP's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Campese

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Rugby_union/Collaboration_of_the_fortnight#David_Campese - if you'd like to see him as collaboration of the fortnight, please add your support here. (By the way, the collaborations usually take longer than a fortnight, but it will bring the article to wider attention.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about the quality of your English, the main thing is to bring this matter to the attention of the active rugby editors on Wikipedia. I think you are right, but I'm afraid I don't know where to begin with it! --MacRusgail (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool F.C. wiki

Hello, I am the lead sysop on the Liverpool F.C. wiki. It is a wiki dedicated solely to Liverpool F.C.. We aim to make the ultimate database for the club we all love. Since adopting the incredibly inactive wiki about a month ago we have greatly increased the article count and modernized it from it's previous state. The problem is there are not many active members on the site and we need more for the site to properly grow. It is well organized and on it's way to be a great site we just need more editors to expand. It is based on Wikia's network of wikis. Like Wikipedia it is free to use and the editing process is exactly the same. If you know how to edit Wikipedia you will know how to edit the Liverpool F.C. wiki. Now for the question you may be asking yourself. Why edit there? Wikipedia has articles on Liverpool. This is true. At the Liverpool wiki it is all about Liverpool. We allow editors to edit anything about Liverpool no matter how trivial. We allow edits on reserve and academy players, and even things as trivial as the fitness coaches for the year 2011. We also do not lock pages to registered users. That means if you have something to say about Steven Gerrard you can click edit and not view source and actually write something. I would love for you to come by and check the wiki out. Feel free to edit any page. Every time you click edit your ARE helping this wiki grow. Thanks for taking the time to read this! http://liverpoolfc.wikia.com/wiki/Liverpool_FC_Wiki --Coffeeclub213 (talk) 02:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrea Masi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English Premiership (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Alessandra Kersevan

I have thanked you at the Talk:Alessandra Kersevan for pointing out the meaning of the term "Negationism" has been changed in Italian public discourse - in the way it is unseen in the rest of the Europe.

I also changed the section's title and corrected what I believe was a typo (you wrote "left-wing" here, but you probably wanted to write "right-wing", am I correct?) DancingPhilosopher ^{my talk} 22:40, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

re: File:Palazzo della Civiltà Italiana, Rome, Italy.jpg

Hi Blackcat. I assume that, when using the Italian language (as it happens with the Spanish) using the imperative is not rude. But in English, especially if you shout (capital letters) it definitely is. And it's even worse if, as it's the case, it was not me the one that included the template. Of course that (provided that I uploaded the file to commons and subsequently deleted it when I noticed the problem with Italian FOP) I should have removed also the template, for another person not to make the same mistake. But that's very different of including said template. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 19:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your "please" makes you shouting not that rude. Especially considering that I didn't tag anything, as you again fail to acknowledge. --Ecemaml (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aliwal2012: Transvaal flag

Hello, Blackcat. You have new messages at Aliwal2012's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kel Tremain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flanker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petrarca Rugby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Braid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English Premiership (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Blackcat

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Zebo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tommaso Allan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Province (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Tetro

Where did you get Sara Tetro's birth date from? I certainly can't see it in the New Zealand Herald article used as a reference.-gadfium 02:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I would like to point out I am not a Sara Tetro's fan nor my field are models or trivia: I was working on the Italian article of Craig Innes and only incidentally "stumbled" into Sara Tetro's one (just because she's his wife). That said, I was disturbed by the lack of vital stats in the said article and made a quick research. From here one can deduce that her b'day is on 11 April; the circumstance is partly confirmed by this 17 April article on Stuff (it doesn't clearly say it's on 11 April but at least it suggests us that it was on the previous week). Finally, this March 2006 article said that she was 36 at that time.
Now, since I know that the Anglo-Saxons don't usually attribute a given age until b'day (to make it clear: we Italians use to say that one "is 35" even if she is 34 and 11 months old :-) ), she had to be 37 on next April, thus she was born in 1969. If we don't want to assume she was born on 11 April 1969 we at least must assume she was born on April 1969. Hope that the explanation was satisfactory. Best Regards. -- SERGIO aka the Black Cat 15:21, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that's good research. FB is not considered a reliable source, but I'm happy that the three sources added together support the date.-gadfium 18:43, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are right and I agree that FB is not a reliable source (though it's about NZNM's FB official page). Let's say that I used it as non-official source just to confirm a supposition. -- SERGIO aka the Black Cat 19:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jake Harders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wirral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ZAF/RSA

That is true, but in rugby terms, South Africa is referred to by the trigramme "RSA". This can be confirmed on the IRB website. – Pee Jay 15:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"RSA" does not redirect to "ZAF", it redirects to "South Africa". "ZAF" also redirects to "South Africa". Therefore the only argument is that, for some reason, {{ru}} recommends the ISO trigrammes. I would contend that we should actually prefer the IRB trigrammes, as they are the ones relevant to rugby union, but in the grand scheme of things, it makes zero difference. You didn't need to make the original change. – Pee Jay 20:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've just read the documentation for {{ru}}. The page does not recommend ISO codes, it says that you can use ISO, IOC or FIFA (why?!) codes, but it doesn't specify which is preferable. – Pee Jay 20:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martyr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enrico Tazzoli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Concetto Lo Bello, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syracuse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unions

Thanks for the comment Sergio. I'll just say that I am bisexual, and approve of civil unions. My reasoning was based on ITN precedent and criteria, not on my POV of the issue or disagreement on the positive local impact. I prefer not to engage in debates over such matters, so while I thank you for your comment, I would like to drop this conversation. μηδείς (talk) 20:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting deletion for pages you created

Please note that if you ever create a page on English Wikipedia, you have the right to have it deleted as long as no one else has edited it. To request such deletion, simply place a {{db-g7}} tag on the page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Blackcat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moved

I moved your comment from WP:AN/RFC back to the article talk page. AN/RFC is for posting requests to have an uninvolved editor assess, summarize, and formally close a discussion on Wikipedia. You can change Scudetto to point to what you think is most appropriate then, if someone reverts your change, start a discussion (or WP:RfC) on the redirect talk page.- Mr X 16:28, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Blackcat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Marcato

Thanks for the edits on the Andrea Marcato rugby article and raising the edit on the Project talk page. I've had a look at the article and the lead needs a little work but Ill sort it out. Keep up the good work! Jkmaskell (talk) 17:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jkmaskell:, you're welcome. Keep in mind that my mother tongue is Italian, thus I always invite others to fix my erros in English :D -- SERGIO aka the Black Cat 18:22, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ip nazionalista da mobile ;)

Grande Sergio ciao. Io per principio non edito più nella wiki italiana, ma ti segnalo che qui it:Campionati europei 2018, un edit ha aggiunto 13 medaglie all'Italia (sempre terza nel medagliere, ma con 15/17/28 = 60 medaglie non 73), probabilmente lo scienziato ha aggiunto le medaglie junior della ginnastica che non fanno parte del medal table ufficiale, in ogni caso non modificando nessuna altra nazione né il totale finale. Addirittura la cavolata resiste dal 13 agosto, se me la puoi correggere per favore ;) --Kasper2006 (talk) 06:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Blackcat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giovanni Minzoni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Argenta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hannah Scott (rower)

added a link pointing to British

Kirsty Barr

added a link pointing to British

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Marco Lanna article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 12:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: hello, I know that Wikipedia relies on reliable sources, I am an 18-years long editor on it.wiki and 10+ years long administrator on Commons. Marco Lanna shares the honours won by UC Sampdoria in that period since he was the team's centre-back :) -- Blackcat 14:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the source saying he won the honour? Saying he won the honour because the team he was contracted to won the honour is not the same. Giant Snowman 14:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ehm.. @GiantSnowman:, association football is a sports team, not individual. When you're in the first-team roster of the team you win the honours. Especially if you're the first choice and have more than 122 league matches :D -- Blackcat 14:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you do not automatically win the honour. Giant Snowman 14:16, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In Italy yes. If you're part of the 1st team's roster you win the honour automatically. But Lanna played 122 League matches for Sampdoria from 1987 to 1993 and was, for example, also on the pitch in the Cups' Winners Cup 1990 matches including the semi vs AS Monaco (see here...). -- Blackcat 14:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stadio Olimpico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Six Nations.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stadio Olimpico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United States national football team.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matia Bazar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANSA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your requested copyedit of Stadio Olimpico is starting

Hi Blackcat, I've begun working on the copy-edit you requested at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page for the article Stadio Olimpico. Please feel free to contact me and to correct or revert my edits if necessary. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 10:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blackcat. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Stadio Olimpico at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Sorry for the delay. Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 17:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stadio Olimpico

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stadio Olimpico you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 04:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asking at WP:FOOTBALL

Hey, do you want me to ask for you? I don't want to fail this article after seeing all the work you've put in. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 16:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rollinginhisgrave: Yes, please, it would be great. I wouldn't even know how to do, since I am not that used to en.wiki. Currently the article in Italian is candidate for GA too, and would be great to have the same in English. -- Blackcat 16:23, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked here. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stadio Olimpico

The article Stadio Olimpico you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stadio Olimpico and Talk:Stadio Olimpico/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 11:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Rollinginhisgrave:, couldn't someone of the project Architecture follow the article? While I am not that bad at English, I cannot claim a so deep knowledge of it as a native speaker can. The corrections to be done require someone who masters well your language. Regards! -- Blackcat 13:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't think they would. The project is not very active, especially compared to the football project. I don't think it will get GA because I don't think it will get the help it needs. But that is okay, what is more important is that you have improved the article a lot, and if someone in the future wants to try to work on the article, they will see our conversation and can use it to improve the article. If you really want, I can ask the architecture project. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 13:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stadio Olimpico

The article Stadio Olimpico you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Stadio Olimpico for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]