User talk:Incognitopublisher

Welcome!

Hello, Incognitopublisher, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Thank you for your support and assistance. I will thoroughly review the entire process to gain a better understanding and meet expectations. Incognitopublisher (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shailesh Shah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shailesh Shah, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 01:59, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Incognitopublisher. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Incognitopublisher, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:17, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shailesh Shah

Hello, I was just curious, are you affiliated with the subject of this article, whether personal or professionally? Hey man im josh (talk) 14:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh

Hi Sir

No, I am not affiliated with the subject of the article in any personal or professional capacity. I created the article as a Wikipedia contributor to provide information on the topic to the public.

I recently viewed a film and upon conducting a search on Google, I noticed that there was a lack of information available on the subject. As a result, I took it upon myself to create a Wikipedia article to contribute to the dissemination of knowledge on the him.

Thank You Incognitopublisher (talk) 14:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any possible conflicts of interest (COI)? I ask because your username resembles that of a company name. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shailesh Shah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shailesh Shah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Akevsharma (talk) 01:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Akevsharma sir

I found him to be a notable person in the Gujarati film industry.

He has made over 20 films in the Gujarati language

https://gujarati.news18.com/news/anand/shailesh-shah-made-more-than-250-albumsand-gujarati-films-asc-local18-1318080.html Incognitopublisher (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Naresh-Raval-Congress.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Naresh-Raval-Congress.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.thestatesman.com/india/gujarat-elections-congress-may-change-naresh-ravals-constituency-1502522502.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 22:57, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, Incognitopublisher, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Peoplepediaindia (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshya Raj Anand moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lakshya Raj Anand, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969, can we discuss this Incognitopublisher (talk) 13:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Onel5969 ,

Thank you for your feedback regarding the article. I understand that you suggested writing in more depth, but unfortunately, the available sources are limited. However, it's worth noting that the subject of the article is a well-recognized Director.

I am open to collaborating with you to enhance the article. Please feel free to discuss specific points that you think need improvement, so we can work together to make the necessary enhancements.

Looking forward to your valuable input and working together to improve this article. Incognitopublisher (talk) 08:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2023 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2023, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Article subject may be notable, but there is not enough information in the article to accurately identify the subject. Submit for review after clarification and references. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 13:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't move this draft to mainspace without submitting it to AFC review. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 09:34, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tousif.15 Submitted for AFC Incognitopublisher (talk) 09:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vishav Deepak Trikha moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vishav Deepak Trikha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:42, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2023 (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2023 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dinesh Lamba, you may be blocked from editing. Sam Kuru (talk) 02:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: given the warnings already on this page, please consider this a final warning. The addition of junk or fake sources, along with promotional puffery is not acceptable. Sam Kuru (talk) 02:36, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

dear

may I know which all sources where junk so that I can keep in mind Incognitopublisher (talk) 08:27, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sam Kuru Ji,

If you believe that my article appears too promotional, I am open to making the necessary edits to present it in a more appropriate manner. Simply deleting the entire source and content won't be helpful for the audience. Instead, I would be willing to work on improving the article's tone and content to ensure it provides value without being overly promotional.

Thank you for your feedback, and I look forward to your guidance in refining the article. Incognitopublisher (talk) 08:41, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Malti Chahar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Malti Chahar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Robert McClenon,

Thank you for your feedback. The references provided for the Biography of draft:Malti Chahar are from reliable national news sources this discussion, demonstrating independent coverage of the subject. Kindly review these references for their extent of coverage and independence, as they align with Wikipedia's notability guidelines for individuals.

We're open to addressing any questions or concerns you may have and appreciate your expertise in maintaining Wikipedia's content quality.

Best regards, Incognitopublisher (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malti Chahar (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NACTOR for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

A very strong showing of notability is required to overcome salting after three deletions, and this draft does not provide that showing. Neither of the film roles listed appears to be significant, and the body of the article does not show significant coverage by reliable sources. Either resubmit something better, or don't resubmit anything.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malti Chahar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello Incognitopublisher. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Incognitopublisher. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Incognitopublisher|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir,

I am writing to inform you that I have recently become a contributor to Wikipedia. It is important to note that my participation is entirely voluntary and I do not receive any financial compensation for the edits I make. My primary focus has been on improving Wikipedia articles related to films. Specifically, I strive to enhance existing articles by expanding stubs and creating new articles for artists associated with film topics. Additionally, I am proactive in responding to random suggestions that are presented on my user homepage.

Your guidelines will assist me in enhancing my contributions.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely, Incognitopublisher (talk) 15:09, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answering so completely. Please continue with your hobby. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your guidance and would like to inform you that I will be implementing the suggestions you provided for the draft:Malti Chahar article. Incognitopublisher (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malti Chahar (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Deepak Chahar.[5][6][7][8][9][10] is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder. Reference quality is gossip column poor

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malti Chahar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:49, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malti Chahar (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malti Chahar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Malti Chahar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Malti Chahar. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Malti Chahar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Malti Chahar. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malti Chahar (August 18)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not one of the sources cited meets the WP:GNG standard, and we would need three or more. (Furthermore, the quality of most of the sources is such that we must consider much of the content not supported by reliable sources.) Given this, and the number of previous declines, not to mention earlier deletions (3 x AfD, plus speedies), I think it is time to put an end to this, to prevent more reviewer time being unnecessarily wasted.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Wasell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —Wasell^(T) 🌻🇺🇦 05:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vishav Deepak Trikha (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vishav Deepak Trikha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshya Raj Anand (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akshithmanya was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lakshya Raj Anand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akshithmanya ^talk 00:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2023 (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:

WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bade Miyan Chote Miyan 2023 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GraziePrego (talk) 04:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Malti Chahar (actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Malti Chahar (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malti Chahar (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 07:00, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Incognitopublisher. Thank you for your work on Rajendra Bharti. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, Incognitopublisher Nice work!, you may add his date of birth and use more independent news sources, add more specific category

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 20:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford comma

You removed an Oxford comma from David Germano. However, Wikipedia has no preference regarding Oxford commas, so it is incorrect to remove them (or add them). Skyerise (talk) 12:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vishav Deepak Trikha

Hello, Incognitopublisher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vishav Deepak Trikha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lakshya Raj Anand

Hello, Incognitopublisher. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lakshya Raj Anand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lakshya Raj Anand

Hello, Incognitopublisher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lakshya Raj Anand".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 13:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information you provided. Once I receive the new news link, I will update this article accordingly. Incognitopublisher (talk) 18:36, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aathur, Chennai (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CFA were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please rewrite this without using AI, making sure information is actually accurate. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aathur, Chennai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 22:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vishav Deepak Trikha

Hello, Incognitopublisher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vishav Deepak Trikha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vamsi Patchipulusu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vamsi Patchipulusu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please clarify how you identified a conflict of interest? If you believe there is one, feel free to make the necessary edits and modifications. Simply sending the draft without addressing it may not be the best solution. We're all here to contribute more and support each other, not to diminish anyone's efforts. Incognitopublisher (talk) 18:10, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How and where did you get the image from? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

twitter Incognitopublisher (talk) 18:14, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please share the link to the image on Twitter. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:16, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sure Incognitopublisher (talk) 18:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

check profile pic

https://x.com/Vamsi_P1988?t=g0DubWu06RZ3uwcNcdGf6A&s=08 Incognitopublisher (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that the profile picture is cropped, but you uploaded a full image. How would you like to explain that? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there is any text that you believe presents a conflict of interest, please edit and modify it accordingly. Incognitopublisher (talk) 18:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

same complete picture has already been shared by him Incognitopublisher (talk) 18:51, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you cannot share the link here, this will be reported to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira https://www.facebook.com/share/p/RRQ4wrNRgKXfeaVW/ Incognitopublisher (talk) 04:58, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, this proves that COI exists. I pity you for thinking that backdating an image on Facebook will go unnoticed. Consider this your final warning and follow what's on WP:PAID. Do not directly edit articles where you have a conflict of interest and ensure that you fully disclose any COI related to the subjects. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira it's not paid Incognitopublisher (talk) 08:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many of the subjects you have edited on Wikipedia do you know personally or professionally? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:21, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vijay Sharma, IRAS moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vijay Sharma, IRAS. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vamsi Patchipulusu (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vamsi Patchipulusu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 16:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Vamsi Patchipulusu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vamsi Patchipulusu. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]