User talk:Hirwa94

This is Hirwa94's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saint Léon Minor Seminary of Kabgayi has been accepted

Saint Léon Minor Seminary of Kabgayi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 19:35, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Petit Séminaire St Léon Kabgayi

Hello, Hirwa94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Petit Séminaire St Léon Kabgayi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hirwa94! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bishop Edouard Sinayobye has been accepted

Bishop Edouard Sinayobye, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muzungu Hirwa (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Goldsztajn was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muzungu Hirwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muzungu Hirwa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Goldsztajn (talk) 13:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Munini Hospital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Munini Hospital, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DJRSD (talk) 16:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Munini Hospital is just a public hospital in Rwanda. This article doesn’t advertise and this hospital is important. Hirwa94 (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muzungu Hirwa

Hello, Hirwa94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muzungu Hirwa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Medical Students’ Association of Rwanda, MEDSAR

Hello, Hirwa94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Medical Students’ Association of Rwanda, MEDSAR, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

I reverted your deletion of a lot of the lead. Please see the ongoing conversation about this on the talk page. CT55555(talk) 04:49, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Centre of Excellence in Data Science (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:African Centre of Excellence in Data Science and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 08:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hirwa94! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 08:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Centre of Excellence in Data Science (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sorry, most of your sources are primary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:African Centre of Excellence in Data Science and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear fellow Wikipedia Lover,

It is so unfortunate that Wikipedia encourages people from low resourced countries to put their contents online only to be discouraged by people like you. You guys put your kindergartens schools on Wikipedia but I can't put information related to the biggest Public University in the country.

What you call reputable sources is what? Do you know what is reputable to Rwandans and Africans? Does everything needs to be seen in your neo-colonial angle?

Never get to understand what is the motivation of Wikipedia when encouraging local creators to writ about their countries. Hirwa94 (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/October 2023/Participants

Thanks for signing up to the drive. However, to review pages you must have a certain permission that requires some mandatory criteria (i.e., more than 500 edits to mainspace) that you currently do not meet. Therefore, I have removed you from the list, but feel free to participate in other areas. Happy editing. VickKiang (talk) 07:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Centre of Excellence in Data Science (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:African Centre of Excellence in Data Science and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I give up. You can go ahead and delete the entry. You guys have your kindergartens school uploaded but you can's stand our universities. You call our institutions and News Paper unreliable but when we provide even the Western Based News report you label them unsatisfactory, unreliable, unverifiable.

Please meditate if your are doing the right thing. Ask yourself, what do I know to determine that such content written in thousands of Kilometers is not notable? Do you know our context?

Anyway, thank you. Hirwa94 (talk) 18:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are referring to here, but I declined the draft because it reads like an advertisement, the topic may well be notable. Theroadislong (talk) 18:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have no problem having an article about your university if it meets the criteria that every other article about a university or organization must meet. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for other inappropriate articles to get by us. We can only address what we know about. We could use help in identifying inapprorpiate articles, if you are interested. If you've seen an article about a kindergarten school that clearly does not meet notability guidelines(see WP:ORG), please nominate it for deletion. This has nothing to do with Africa or your race, of which we really have no certainty about what it might be.

You claimed the logo as your own personal work. Did you personally create the logo to the university, and do you really want to make it available for anyone to use for any purpose with attribution? 331dot (talk) 19:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am only a volunteer. The logo was uploaded before I really understand copy rights issues. For your last question, NO. Hirwa94 (talk) 19:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please stop being condescending. i attacked no one. comment on the substance raised or don't. but no need to educate me on morality or something else i don't know. Hirwa94 (talk) 15:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You keep accusing reviewers of "anti-African sentiment" etc., saying "you guys have your kindergartens there", and so on, and doing that here, at the AfC help desk, and the Teahouse, and when I ask you to pipe down you have the cheek to say you're not attacking anyone. Really? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did I attack you? Since when raising my concerns is a form of attack?

Since when speaking my mind is an attack? Isn't a fact that some westerners have bias against the quality of work produced from Africa? Don't you know this? Let me provide you with references: https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2018/03/26/597067628/scientists-in-africa-wonder-if-theres-bias-against-their-research

Isn't a fact that westners have their kindergarden on wikipedia while african universities struggle to get your approval? dou you want me to give you examples?

Are these facts constitute an attack in your eyes? Hirwa94 (talk) 16:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: African Centre of Excellence in Data Science has been accepted

African Centre of Excellence in Data Science, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 19:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Hirwa94 There is a bias issue on Wikipedia, but I hope you now understand that neither I nor the other two reviewers had an anti-African stance when it came to this article. Thanks for partaking in the AfC process. Qcne (talk) 19:13, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK) has been accepted

University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rwandan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mageragere Prison has been accepted

Mageragere Prison, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 09:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]