User talk:DJRSD

Welcome!

Hello, DJRSD, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Architecture Discipline, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Praxidicae (talk) 14:04, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Architecture Discipline for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Architecture Discipline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Architecture Discipline until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 09:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CSD tagging

Hi there

Please be careful with CSD tagging. There's some tags you have added that I'm not sure meet the policy. Please see Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Local Variable (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please suggest which CSD tags are not appropriate. DJRSD (talk) 17:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I only thought to check up on this now. You can use {{ping|username}} to ping people. This one was added by a fairly experienced editor and credibly stated the importance or significance of the subject. The deletion test for A7 is of course higher than the test for deletion for want of notability. This one has POV problems, but I really don't think it is G11 material. Perhaps it will be deleted if the author doesn't challenge the tag. Actually, the article which first attracted my attention was this one, which has now been deleted. It seems you were vindicated in the end - it was deleted. I was honestly a bit surprised about that - it contained a source, there are several Google results for the subject, and contained a credible claim of significance in the form of a significant following. It was those three articles, coupled with the relatively few edits you have, that led me to comment. I gained the impression you were 'having a go' at speedy deletion tagging without being across the criteria, but sorry, I guess I was mistaken - the number of errors is fairly low so far. Happy patrolling. Local Variable (talk) 12:26, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nitin Natarajan

Is there supposed to be a discussion about a page being proposed for deletion? I thought that is the process.Yousef Raz (talk) 19:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CSD Tagging

Hi DJRSD

Once again, please be careful with CSD tagging. Speedy deletion criteria A7, A9, and A11 mandates that pages can only be tagged for CSD if they don't make a "credible claim of significance" (See Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance), which is a much more lenient standard than notability. If notability is concerned, please use either PROD or XFD. Carwile2 ^*message* 12:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Carwile2, Can you please explain which CSD tag is inappropriate? DJRSD (talk) 05:36, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you tagged Chester Stone for CSD. CSD criteria A7, A9, and A11 should only be used where there is no claim of significance. The page asserts that the subject is an influencer and includes somewhat-credible citations to back this. It is, however, questionable whether this page would meet Wikipedia:Notability. Because of this, AfD or PROD would be more appropriate. CSD has a strict criteria that should not be overused (See Wikipedia:New pages patrol). Carwile2 ^*message* 13:19, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding deletion of Changa app

I have researched around it and have added all the reliable sources. I read all the media published articles and only then have I created this Wikipedia page. Woodpecker123 (talk) 12:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rishabh Thakur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rishabh Thakur, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 17:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is CSD Abuse. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:53, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: You are expected to provide a statement there before continuing to edit, and you are expected not to nominate new pages for deletion until the discussion has been closed or archived. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:57, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stefanie Gurzanski

Hello. I noticed that you tagged the Stefanie Gurzanski page for undisclosed paid editing and moved it to draft space. Another editor has created an identical copy of the draft in main space at Stephanie Knight Gurzanski. This all-new article looked eerily familiar. The new article has been tagged as possibly tainted, but supporting evidence will be needed. • Gene93k (talk) 13:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Platformafrica

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Platformafrica, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.platformafrica.ngo/our-team/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:58, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Elli, I am not the creator of the article Platformafrica, User:Aloro gordon paul is the main creator of this article. You should notify to creator of this article. Moreover i already moved article from main-space to draft but creator again published the article without fixing the issue. For such cases article must not be move to draft again but it should be go for afd or speedy. DJRSD (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DJRSD: yeah, I know. We edit-conflicted, sorry about that. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Radio Quarantine

Hello DJRSD. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Radio Quarantine, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Coverage in newspapers like the NYT, The Economist, Business Standard means WP:A7 is not applicable here. Presumably any WP:G11 issues would have been thoroughly beaten down in its DYK nomination. Pete AU aka . Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK Shirts58, Noted. DJRSD (talk) 10:01, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:00, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:JeepersClub per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JeepersClub. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]